btrfs: use IOMAP_DIO_BOUNCE flag instead of falling back to buffered IO
Subsystems (3)
v4 cover btrfs: use IOMAP_DIO_BOUNCE flag instead of falling back to buffered IO
[CHANGELOG]
v4:
- Follow iomap/block layer code style to avoid lines over 80 chars
- Reject NOWAIT BOUNCE direct writes inside btrfs
The iomap code still allocates memory with GFP_KERNEL in other locations.
For now just disable NOWAIT BOUNCE direct writes and let the caller fall back to blocking mode.
v3:
- Fix a bug in error handling of bio_iov_iter_bounce_write() Which can lead to generic/708 failure on btrfs.
- Respect nofault flag in bio_iov_iter_bounce_write() To avoid btrfs specific deadlocks.
- Reject NOWAIT and BOUNCE direct IOs
Since BOUNCE always allocate pages using GFP_KERNEL, which can sleep and break NOWAIT requirement, has to reject such combination.
v2:
- Rework the comment in btrfs_dio_write()
Commit 968f19c5b1b7 ("btrfs: always fallback to buffered write if the inode requires checksum") solved the csum mismatch caused by unstable direct IO buffers, it has a pretty hefty performance penalty.
Meanwhile upstream iomap has introduce IOMAP_DIO_BOUNCE flag to get stable buffers meanwhile without falling back to buffered IOs.
Using that flag btrfs can reach 95% of the original zero-copy direct IO performance, almost 2x the current buffered fallback performance.
However during my tests, there are several bugs related to iomap that can lead to direct IO test case failures:
- generic/708
Results garbage in the end of the writes, is a bug in the error handling of a short copy.
Fixed in the first patch.
- Deadlock if using the page cache as direct IO buffer This is because bio_iov_iter_bounce_write() doesn't respect iov_iter::nofault flag.
Fixed in the second patch.
- Possible NOWAIT and BOUNCE conflicts
BOUNCE flag for both reads and writes will allocate new folios using GFP_KERNEL, which can sleep and break NOWAIT requirement.
Reject such combination in btrfs when enabling IOMAP_DIO_BOUNCE support.
And the final one will enable btrfs to use IOMAP_DIO_BOUNCE flag, so that even with data checksum we do not need to fallback to buffered IO and reclaim most of the dropped direct IO performance.
Qu Wenruo (3):
block: revert the iov_iter after a short copy in
bio_iov_iter_bounce_write()
block: respect iov_iter::nofault flag in bio_iov_iter_bounce_write()
btrfs: use IOMAP_DIO_BOUNCE flag instead of falling back to buffered
IO
block/bio.c | 21 +++++++++++++--- fs/btrfs/direct-io.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.54.0
PATCH v4 1/3 block: revert the iov_iter after a short copy in bio_iov_iter_bounce_write()
For the incoming IOMAP_DIO_BOUNCE flag usage inside btrfs, it's pretty easy to hit short copy inside bio_iov_iter_bounce_write().
This is because btrfs has disabled page fault to avoid certain deadlock during direct writes, and instead btrfs manually fault in the pages then retry.
And inside bio_iov_iter_bounce_write(), if we hit a short write, we didn't revert the iov_iter, which can cause problems like unexpected garbage for the next retry.
Revert the iov_iter after a short copy.
One thing to note is that, the folio is allocated then immediately queued into the bio, so the proper revert size should be (bi_size - this_len + copied).
--- block/bio.c | 17 ++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
block/bio.c +14 -3
@@ -1321,6 +1321,7 @@ static int bio_iov_iter_bounce_write(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter, do { size_t this_len = min(total_len, SZ_1M); + size_t copied; struct folio *folio; if (this_len > minsize * 2)
@@ -1334,12 +1335,22 @@ static int bio_iov_iter_bounce_write(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter,break ;bio_add_folio_nofail (bio, folio, this_len,0 ); -if (copy_from_iter (folio_address (folio), this_len, iter) != - this_len) { + copied =copy_from_iter (folio_address (folio), this_len, iter); +if (copied < this_len) { +/* +* Need to revert the iov iter for all bytes we have +* copied. +* +* However the bio size differs from the real copied +* bytes as @this_len is queued but only advanced +* less than that. +* Need to compensate that for the revert. +*/ +iov_iter_revert (iter, bio->bi_iter.bi_size - this_len + + copied);bio_free_folios (bio);return -EFAULT ; } - total_len -= this_len; }while (total_len && bio->bi_vcnt < bio->bi_max_vecs);
Signature · 1 line
2.54.0
Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] block: revert the iov_iter after a short copy in bio_iov_iter_bounce_write()
Looks good:
PATCH v4 2/3 block: respect iov_iter::nofault flag in bio_iov_iter_bounce_write()
In reply to Qu WenruoFor the incoming usage of IOMAP_DIO_BOUNCE in btrfs, btrfs has set iov_iter::nofault to prevent deadlock when a page fault is needed to read out the buffer.
However bio_iov_iter_bounce_write() doesn't respect iov_iter::nofault flag, and just call a plain copy_from_iter() so it can still trigger page fault and cause deadlock in btrfs.
Fix it by utilizing copy_folio_from_iter_atomic() if nofault flag is set, otherwise use copy_folio_from_iter().
--- block/bio.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
block/bio.c +5 -1
@@ -1335,7 +1335,11 @@ static int bio_iov_iter_bounce_write(struct bio *bio, struct iov_iter *iter,break ;bio_add_folio_nofail (bio, folio, this_len,0 ); - copied =copy_from_iter (folio_address (folio), this_len, iter); +if (iter->nofault) + copied =copy_folio_from_iter_atomic (folio,0 , this_len, + iter); +else + copied =copy_folio_from_iter (folio,0 , this_len, iter);if (copied < this_len) {/* * Need to revert the iov iter for all bytes we have
Signature · 1 line
2.54.0
Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] block: respect iov_iter::nofault flag in bio_iov_iter_bounce_write()
Looks good:
PATCH v4 3/3 btrfs: use IOMAP_DIO_BOUNCE flag instead of falling back to buffered IO
In reply to Qu WenruoPreviously btrfs forces direct writes to fall back to buffered ones if the inode has data checksum or the profile has duplication.
That fallback is to avoid the content being modified that the final content may mismatch with the checksum or the other mirrors.
That brings a pretty huge performance cost, which already caused some concern at that time.
But later upstream commit c9d114846b38 ("iomap: add a flag to bounce buffer direct I/O") introduced a new method by copying the content into new pages, and do all the operations based on the newly allocated pages.
So let btrfs to utilize the new flag for direct writes if we require stable folios.
There is a quick benchmark, using the following fio setup:
fio --name=randwrite --filename $mnt/foobar --ioengine=libaio --size=4G \
--rw=randwrite --iodepth=64 --runtime=60 --time_based --direct=1 \
--bs=$blocksizeUnit is MiB/s.
Blocksize | Zero-copy (*) | Buffered | Bounce
-----------+---------------+----------+-----------
4K | 35.1 | 17.1 | 33.8
64K | 522 | 251 | 492*: This is done by reverting the commit 968f19c5b1b7 ("btrfs: always
fallback to buffered write if the inode requires checksum")
Although with page bouncing the performance is only around 95% of true-zero copy, it's still almost double the performance of buffered fallback.
There will be a small change in behavior, since we're using IOMAP_DIO_BOUNCE flag to allocate new folios, NOWAIT flag will immediately fail.
So for true NOWAIT direct IOs, NODATASUM and RAID0/SINGLE profiles are still required.
--- fs/btrfs/direct-io.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
fs/btrfs/direct-io.c +29 -29
@@ -818,13 +818,41 @@ static ssize_t btrfs_dio_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter, IOMAP_DIO_PARTIAL | IOMAP_DIO_FSBLOCK_ALIGNED, &data, done_before); } +static bool need_stable_write (struct btrfs_inode *inode) +{ +const u64 data_profile =btrfs_data_alloc_profile (inode->root->fs_info) & +BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK ; + +/* Data checksum requires stable buffer. */ +if (!(inode->flags &BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM )) +return true; +/* +* Any profile with mirror/parity will require stable buffer. +* Otherwise the mirror may differ from each other. +* +* Thus only SINGLE and RAID0 doesn't require stable buffer. +*/ +if (data_profile !=0 && data_profile !=BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0 ) +return true; +return false; +} +static struct iomap_dio *btrfs_dio_write (struct kiocb *iocb,struct iov_iter *iter,size_t done_before) {struct btrfs_dio_data data = {0 }; +unsigned int dio_flags =IOMAP_DIO_PARTIAL |IOMAP_DIO_FSBLOCK_ALIGNED ; + +if (need_stable_write (BTRFS_I (file_inode (iocb->ki_filp)))) { +/* For now no support for BOUNCE and NOWAIT direct write. */ +if (iocb->ki_flags &IOCB_NOWAIT ) +return ERR_PTR (-EAGAIN ); + + dio_flags |=IOMAP_DIO_BOUNCE ; + }return __iomap_dio_rw (iocb, iter, &btrfs_dio_iomap_ops, &btrfs_dio_ops, -IOMAP_DIO_PARTIAL |IOMAP_DIO_FSBLOCK_ALIGNED , &data, done_before); + dio_flags, &data, done_before); } static ssize_t check_direct_IO(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
@@ -853,8 +881,6 @@ ssize_t btrfs_direct_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)ssize_t ret;unsigned int ilock_flags =0 ;struct iomap_dio *dio; -const u64 data_profile =btrfs_data_alloc_profile (fs_info) & -BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK ;if (iocb->ki_flags &IOCB_NOWAIT ) ilock_flags |=BTRFS_ILOCK_TRY ;
@@ -868,16 +894,6 @@ ssize_t btrfs_direct_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)if (iocb->ki_pos +iov_iter_count (from) <=i_size_read (inode) &&IS_NOSEC (inode)) ilock_flags |=BTRFS_ILOCK_SHARED ; -/* -* If our data profile has duplication (either extra mirrors or RAID56), -* we can not trust the direct IO buffer, the content may change during -* writeback and cause different contents written to different mirrors. -* -* Thus only RAID0 and SINGLE can go true zero-copy direct IO. -*/ -if (data_profile !=BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID0 && data_profile !=0 ) - goto buffered; - relock: ret =btrfs_inode_lock (BTRFS_I (inode), ilock_flags);if (ret <0 )
@@ -918,22 +934,6 @@ ssize_t btrfs_direct_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)btrfs_inode_unlock (BTRFS_I (inode), ilock_flags); goto buffered; } -/* -* We can't control the folios being passed in, applications can write -* to them while a direct IO write is in progress. This means the -* content might change after we calculated the data checksum. -* Therefore we can end up storing a checksum that doesn't match the -* persisted data. -* -* To be extra safe and avoid false data checksum mismatch, if the -* inode requires data checksum, just fallback to buffered IO. -* For buffered IO we have full control of page cache and can ensure -* no one is modifying the content during writeback. -*/ -if (!(BTRFS_I (inode)->flags &BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM )) { -btrfs_inode_unlock (BTRFS_I (inode), ilock_flags); - goto buffered; - }/* * The iov_iter can be mapped to the same file range we are writing to.
Signature · 1 line
2.54.0
Quoted 36 lines · Qu Wenruo
Previously btrfs forces direct writes to fall back to buffered ones if the inode has data checksum or the profile has duplication.
That fallback is to avoid the content being modified that the final content may mismatch with the checksum or the other mirrors.
That brings a pretty huge performance cost, which already caused some concern at that time.
But later upstream commit
c9d114846b38("iomap: add a flag to bounce buffer direct I/O") introduced a new method by copying the content into new pages, and do all the operations based on the newly allocated pages.So let btrfs to utilize the new flag for direct writes if we require stable folios.
There is a quick benchmark, using the following fio setup:
fio --name=randwrite --filename $mnt/foobar --ioengine=libaio --size=4G \ --rw=randwrite --iodepth=64 --runtime=60 --time_based --direct=1 \ --bs=$blocksizeUnit is MiB/s.
Blocksize | Zero-copy (*) | Buffered | Bounce
-----------+---------------+----------+-----------4K | 35.1 | 17.1 | 33.8 64K | 522 | 251 | 492*: This is done by reverting the commit
968f19c5b1b7("btrfs: always
fallback to buffered write if the inode requires checksum")Although with page bouncing the performance is only around 95% of true-zero copy, it's still almost double the performance of buffered fallback.
Quoted 8 lines
There will be a small change in behavior, since we're using
IOMAP_DIO_BOUNCEflag to allocate new folios, NOWAIT flag will immediately fail.So for true NOWAIT direct IOs, NODATASUM and RAID0/SINGLE profiles are still required.
Signed-off-by Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>
The block layer patches have been merged and our for-next is now based on 7.2-rc1 so pleaase add this one too so we can get back the dio performance. Thanks.
Note: You'll need to include Jens for the block bits to get either an ACK or a merge through the block tree.
Jens Axboe
maintainerQuoted 2 lines · Christoph Hellwig
Note: You'll need to include Jens for the block bits to get either an ACK or a merge through the block tree.
I can queue 1-2, then Qu can push the btrfs change in once that lands.
Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe
Re: (subset) [PATCH v4 0/3] btrfs: use IOMAP_DIO_BOUNCE flag instead of falling back to buffered IO
In reply to Qu WenruoQuoted 11 lines · Qu Wenruo
[CHANGELOG]
v4:
- Follow iomap/block layer code style to avoid lines over 80 chars- Reject NOWAIT BOUNCE direct writes inside btrfs
The iomap code still allocates memory withGFP_KERNELin other locations.
For now just disable NOWAIT BOUNCE direct writes and let the caller fall back to blocking mode.[...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/3] block: revert the iov_iter after a short copy in bio_iov_iter_bounce_write()
commit: b68d4979c88e31488970373f67ac79b4f6267008
[2/3] block: respect iov_iter::nofault flag in bio_iov_iter_bounce_write()
commit: d5b58fbb2fd7ac25fcd7e1c14730f998a90b0322Best regards,
Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe