iommu: Fix attach handle publication ordering
cover iommu: Fix attach handle publication ordering
Jason pointed out an issue in the attach handle replacing path:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/[email protected]/
When an attachment is detached or replaced, the IOMMU core can still leave the outgoing attach handle published while calling into the driver. A fault report looks up the handle without the group mutex, so it can find the old handle after the driver's fault flush and just before the caller frees it.
These four patches unpublish the outgoing handle before a driver callback for both group and PASID detach and replace operations. Both replace paths store XA_ZERO_ENTRY to reserve the slot and restore the old entry on error.
This blocks new lookups, but does not retire a fault that already obtained the old handle. The driver must still synchronize those readers before the handle is freed. A same-domain replacement skips the driver callback, so it still needs a separate lifetime mechanism or fence.
This is on GitHub:
https://github.com/nicolinc/iommufd/commits/fix_iommu_attach_handle-v1
Nicolin Chen (4):
iommu: Unpublish the attach handle before the group detach callback
iommu: Unpublish the attach handle before the PASID detach callback
iommu: Unpublish the old attach handle before the group replace
callback
iommu: Unpublish the old attach handle before the PASID replace
callback
drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
base-commit: cee9395acd8043be0644b25c34bfa86623f2b935
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
PATCH 1/4 iommu: Unpublish the attach handle before the group detach callback
The group->pasid_array entry is erased only after the detach callback has returned, so the outgoing attach handle stays published for the whole of that call. iommu_attach_handle_get() reads it under the xa_lock alone, not under the group mutex, so a fault raised in the meantime still finds that handle and the domain being detached, both of which the caller frees the moment that detach returns.
Commit 5e9f822c9c68 ("iommu: Swap the order of setting group->pasid_array and calling attach op of iommu drivers") has fixed the attach path, while the detach path never got the symmetric change.
Erase the entry ahead of the callback instead. A missing entry reads back as NULL from xa_load(), so that iommu_attach_handle_get() returns -ENOENT and the fault gets rejected rather than delivered against a domain that is on its way out.
--- drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/iommu/iommu.c +5 -1
@@ -3951,8 +3951,12 @@ void iommu_detach_group_handle(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct iommu_group *group) {mutex_lock (&group->mutex); -__iommu_group_set_core_domain (group); +/* +* Unpublish the handle first, so it would not resolve to the detaching +* domain once the driver is detaching it. +*/ xa_erase (&group->pasid_array,IOMMU_NO_PASID ); +__iommu_group_set_core_domain (group);mutex_unlock (&group->mutex); }EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL (iommu_detach_group_handle,"IOMMUFD_INTERNAL" );
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
RE: [PATCH v1 1/4] iommu: Unpublish the attach handle before the group detach callback
Quoted 19 lines
From: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2026 5:52 AMThe
group->pasid_arrayentry is erased only after the detach callback has returned, so the outgoing attach handle stays published for the whole of that call.iommu_attach_handle_get()reads it under thexa_lockalone, not under the group mutex, so a fault raised in the meantime still finds that handle and the domain being detached, both of which the caller frees the moment that detach returns.Commit
5e9f822c9c68("iommu: Swap the order of settinggroup->pasid_arrayand calling attach op of iommu drivers") has fixed the attach path, while the detach path never got the symmetric change.Erase the entry ahead of the callback instead. A missing entry reads back as NULL from
xa_load(), so thatiommu_attach_handle_get()returns-ENOENTand the fault gets rejected rather than delivered against a domain that is on its way out.
Quoted 5 lines
Fixes 8519e689834a ("iommu: Extend domain attach group with handlesupport")
Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] iommu: Unpublish the attach handle before the group detach callback
In reply to Nicolin ChenQuoted 11 lines · Nicolin Chen
The
group->pasid_arrayentry is erased only after the detach callback has returned, so the outgoing attach handle stays published for the whole of that call.iommu_attach_handle_get()reads it under thexa_lockalone, not under the group mutex, so a fault raised in the meantime still finds that handle and the domain being detached, both of which the caller frees the moment that detach returns.Commit
5e9f822c9c68("iommu: Swap the order of settinggroup->pasid_arrayand calling attach op of iommu drivers") has fixed the attach path, while the detach path never got the symmetric change.
Quoted 8 lines
Erase the entry ahead of the callback instead. A missing entry reads back as NULL from
xa_load(), so thatiommu_attach_handle_get()returns-ENOENTand the fault gets rejected rather than delivered against a domain that is on its way out.Fixes 8519e689834a ("iommu: Extend domain attach group with handle support")Assisted-by LLM
This tag is no longer necessary.
Quoted 13 lines
Signed-off-by Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/iommu/iommu.c +0
-0@@ -3951,8 +3951,12 @@ void iommu_detach_group_handle(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct iommu_group *group) {mutex_lock (&group->mutex);
drivers/iommu/iommu.c void iommu_detach_group_handle(struct iommu_domain *domain, · line 3962
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iommu/iommu.c +5
-1-__iommu_group_set_core_domain (group); +/* +* Unpublish the handle first, so it would not resolve to the detaching +* domain once the driver is detaching it. +*/ xa_erase (&group->pasid_array,IOMMU_NO_PASID ); +__iommu_group_set_core_domain (group);mutex_unlock (&group->mutex); }EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL (iommu_detach_group_handle,"IOMMUFD_INTERNAL" );
PATCH 2/4 iommu: Unpublish the attach handle before the PASID detach callback
In reply to Nicolin Cheniommu_detach_device_pasid() erases the group->pasid_array entry only once __iommu_remove_group_pasid() has returned, so the detaching handle stays visible to iommu_attach_handle_get() for the whole of that callback, and the caller frees it as soon as the detach returns.
Erase the entry ahead of the callback, for the same reason the group path
does: a fault raised in the meantime must not resolve to a domain that is on its way out.
--- drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/iommu/iommu.c +5 -1
@@ -3818,8 +3818,12 @@ void iommu_detach_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev,struct iommu_group *group = dev->iommu_group;mutex_lock (&group->mutex); -__iommu_remove_group_pasid (group, pasid, domain); +/* +* Unpublish the handle first, so it would not resolve to the detaching +* domain once the driver is detaching it. +*/ xa_erase (&group->pasid_array, pasid); +__iommu_remove_group_pasid (group, pasid, domain);mutex_unlock (&group->mutex); }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (iommu_detach_device_pasid);
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
RE: [PATCH v1 2/4] iommu: Unpublish the attach handle before the PASID detach callback
Quoted 12 lines
From: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2026 5:52 AM
iommu_detach_device_pasid()erases thegroup->pasid_arrayentry only once__iommu_remove_group_pasid()has returned, so the detaching handle stays visible toiommu_attach_handle_get()for the whole of that callback, and the caller frees it as soon as the detach returns.Erase the entry ahead of the callback, for the same reason the group path
does: a fault raised in the meantime must not resolve to a domain that is on its way out.
Quoted 5 lines
Fixes 16603704559c ("iommu: Add attach/detach_dev_pasid iommuinterfaces")
Re: [PATCH v1 2/4] iommu: Unpublish the attach handle before the PASID detach callback
In reply to Nicolin ChenQuoted 5 lines · Nicolin Chen
iommu_detach_device_pasid()erases thegroup->pasid_arrayentry only once__iommu_remove_group_pasid()has returned, so the detaching handle stays visible toiommu_attach_handle_get()for the whole of that callback, and the caller frees it as soon as the detach returns.
Quoted 7 lines
Erase the entry ahead of the callback, for the same reason the group path
does: a fault raised in the meantime must not resolve to a domain that is on its way out.Fixes 16603704559c ("iommu: Add attach/detach_dev_pasid iommu interfaces")Assisted-by LLM
ditto
Quoted 13 lines
Signed-off-by Nicolin Chen<[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/iommu/iommu.c +0
-0@@ -3818,8 +3818,12 @@ void iommu_detach_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev,struct iommu_group *group = dev->iommu_group;mutex_lock (&group->mutex);
drivers/iommu/iommu.c void iommu_detach_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev, · line 3829
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iommu/iommu.c +5
-1-__iommu_remove_group_pasid (group, pasid, domain); +/* +* Unpublish the handle first, so it would not resolve to the detaching +* domain once the driver is detaching it. +*/ xa_erase (&group->pasid_array, pasid); +__iommu_remove_group_pasid (group, pasid, domain);mutex_unlock (&group->mutex); }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (iommu_detach_device_pasid);
PATCH 3/4 iommu: Unpublish the old attach handle before the group replace callback
In reply to Nicolin Cheniommu_replace_group_handle() looks like it hides the detaching handle ahead of the driver callback. But in fact, xa_reserve() calls xa_cmpxchg(), which stores only when the current entry matches @old=NULL. For a replace, there must be an entry sitting there by definition (i.e. @old cannot be NULL), so the compare fails, XA_ZERO_ENTRY is never written, and the call decays into a plain read.
Therefore, the old handle stays published during __iommu_group_set_domain() and only gets replaced after the call. This creates a window, during which an asynchronous fault path might hit UAF:
core, holding group->mutex fault path, no group->mutex
========================== ===========================
xa_reserve() ,-- old handle stays published
no-op, the slot is occupied |
__iommu_group_set_domain() |
driver attach/detach ops |
iopf_queue_flush_dev() |
| iommu_attach_handle_get()
| reads old_handle
xa_store(new entry) `-- window closes
mutex_unlock()
kfree(old_handle) [caller]
UAF: old_handle->domain->iopf_handler()Replace the xa_reserve() with xa_store(XA_ZERO_ENTRY) to unpublish the old handle.
--- drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 23 +++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
drivers/iommu/iommu.c +13 -10
@@ -3985,7 +3985,7 @@ int iommu_replace_group_handle(struct iommu_group *group,struct iommu_domain *new_domain, struct iommu_attach_handle *handle) { - void *curr, *entry; + void *curr, *entry, *old;int ret;if (!new_domain || !handle)
@@ -3993,22 +3993,25 @@ int iommu_replace_group_handle(struct iommu_group *group,mutex_lock (&group->mutex); entry =iommu_make_pasid_array_entry (new_domain, handle); - ret =xa_reserve (&group->pasid_array,IOMMU_NO_PASID ,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (ret) +/* +* iommu_attach_handle_get() runs without the group mutex, so unpublish +* the old handle before the driver callback: a fault must not resolve +* to either domain while the switch is in progress. This reserves the +* slot too, so the store below cannot fail. +*/ + old =xa_store (&group->pasid_array,IOMMU_NO_PASID ,XA_ZERO_ENTRY , +GFP_KERNEL ); +if (xa_is_err (old)) { + ret =xa_err (old); goto err_unlock; + } ret =__iommu_group_set_domain (group, new_domain);if (ret) - goto err_release; + entry = old;/* Restore the old handle */ curr =xa_store (&group->pasid_array,IOMMU_NO_PASID , entry,GFP_KERNEL );WARN_ON (xa_is_err (curr)); - -mutex_unlock (&group->mutex); - -return 0 ; -err_release: -xa_release (&group->pasid_array,IOMMU_NO_PASID ); err_unlock:mutex_unlock (&group->mutex);return ret;
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
RE: [PATCH v1 3/4] iommu: Unpublish the old attach handle before the group replace callback
Quoted 30 lines
From: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2026 5:52 AM
iommu_replace_group_handle()looks like it hides the detaching handle ahead of the driver callback. But in fact,xa_reserve()callsxa_cmpxchg(), which stores only when the current entry matches @old=NULL. For a replace, there must be an entry sitting there by definition (i.e. @old cannot be NULL), so the compare fails,XA_ZERO_ENTRYis never written, and the call decays into a plain read.Therefore, the old handle stays published during
__iommu_group_set_domain()
and only gets replaced after the call. This creates a window, during which an asynchronous fault path might hit UAF:core, holding
group->mutexfault path, nogroup->mutex
========================== ===========================xa_reserve() ,-- old handle stays published no-op, the slot is occupied | __iommu_group_set_domain() | driver attach/detach ops | iopf_queue_flush_dev() | | iommu_attach_handle_get() | reads old_handle xa_store(new entry) `-- window closes mutex_unlock() kfree(old_handle) [caller] UAF: old_handle->domain->iopf_handler()
Quoted 8 lines
Replace the
xa_reserve()withxa_store(XA_ZERO_ENTRY)to unpublish the old handle.Fixes 8519e689834a ("iommu: Extend domain attach group with handlesupport")
btw I just realized that neither old code nor this fix can actually support replacement with lossless fault handling, but I don't recall whether it was the original goal (then destroyed by a following change) or intended to be a future enhancement...
Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] iommu: Unpublish the old attach handle before the group replace callback
Quoted 39 lines · Kevin
Quoted 30 lines
From: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2026 5:52 AM
iommu_replace_group_handle()looks like it hides the detaching handle ahead of the driver callback. But in fact,xa_reserve()callsxa_cmpxchg(), which stores only when the current entry matches @old=NULL. For a replace, there must be an entry sitting there by definition (i.e. @old cannot be NULL), so the compare fails,XA_ZERO_ENTRYis never written, and the call decays into a plain read.Therefore, the old handle stays published during
__iommu_group_set_domain()
and only gets replaced after the call. This creates a window, during which an asynchronous fault path might hit UAF:core, holding
group->mutexfault path, nogroup->mutex
========================== ===========================xa_reserve() ,-- old handle stays published no-op, the slot is occupied | __iommu_group_set_domain() | driver attach/detach ops | iopf_queue_flush_dev() | | iommu_attach_handle_get() | reads old_handle xa_store(new entry) `-- window closes mutex_unlock() kfree(old_handle) [caller] UAF: old_handle->domain->iopf_handler()Quoted 8 lines
Replace the
xa_reserve()withxa_store(XA_ZERO_ENTRY)to unpublish the old handle.Fixes 8519e689834a ("iommu: Extend domain attach group with handlesupport")
Quoted 6 lines
Reviewed-by Kevin Tian <[email protected]>btw I just realized that neither old code nor this fix can actually support replacement with lossless fault handling, but I don't recall whether it was the original goal (then destroyed by a following change) or intended to be a future enhancement...
There was a related discussion[1]. With this patch, a page request in the replace window gets IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_INVALID instead of being serviced - spec only says re-issuing the same PRG won't succeed unless the mapping changes, it doesn't forbid retry. So I think this is just a more conservative instance of the failure case Jason already called OK in [1], not a new hazard.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/[email protected]/
Regards,
Yi Liu
Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] iommu: Unpublish the old attach handle before the group replace callback
Quoted 54 lines · Yi Liu
Quoted 39 lines · Kevin
Quoted 30 lines
From: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2026 5:52 AM
iommu_replace_group_handle()looks like it hides the detaching handle ahead of the driver callback. But in fact,xa_reserve()callsxa_cmpxchg(), which stores only when the current entry matches @old=NULL. For a replace, there must be an entry sitting there by definition (i.e. @old cannot be NULL), so the compare fails,XA_ZERO_ENTRYis never written, and the call decays into a plain read.Therefore, the old handle stays published during
__iommu_group_set_domain()
and only gets replaced after the call. This creates a window, during which an asynchronous fault path might hit UAF:core, holding
group->mutexfault path, nogroup->mutex
========================== ===========================xa_reserve() ,-- old handle stays published no-op, the slot is occupied | __iommu_group_set_domain() | driver attach/detach ops | iopf_queue_flush_dev() | | iommu_attach_handle_get() | reads old_handle xa_store(new entry) `-- window closes mutex_unlock() kfree(old_handle) [caller] UAF: old_handle->domain->iopf_handler()Quoted 8 lines
Replace the
xa_reserve()withxa_store(XA_ZERO_ENTRY)to unpublish the old handle.Fixes 8519e689834a ("iommu: Extend domain attach group with handlesupport")
Quoted 6 lines
Reviewed-by Kevin Tian <[email protected]>btw I just realized that neither old code nor this fix can actually support replacement with lossless fault handling, but I don't recall whether it was the original goal (then destroyed by a following change) or intended to be a future enhancement...
There was a related discussion[1]. With this patch, a page request in the replace window gets
IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_INVALIDinstead of being serviced - spec only says re-issuing the same PRG won't succeed unless the mapping changes, it doesn't forbid retry. So I think this is just a more conservative instance of the failure case Jason already called OK in [1], not a new hazard.
Quoted 2 lines
I called using either the old or new translation OK, using neither seems suboptimal. So returning IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_INVALID doesn't sound ideal..
Jason
RE: [PATCH v1 3/4] iommu: Unpublish the old attach handle before the group replace callback
Quoted 62 lines
From: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2026 2:46 AMQuoted 5 lines · Yi Liu
Quoted 4 lines · Kevin
Quoted 4 lines
From: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2026 5:52 AM
iommu_replace_group_handle()looks like it hides the detaching handleahead
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
of the driver callback. But in fact,
xa_reserve()callsxa_cmpxchg(), which stores only when the current entry matches @old=NULL. For a replace,there
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
must be an entry sitting there by definition (i.e. @old cannot be NULL), so the compare fails,
XA_ZERO_ENTRYis never written, and the call decaysinto
Quoted 22 lines
Quoted 22 lines
Quoted 22 lines
a plain read.
Therefore, the old handle stays published during
__iommu_group_set_domain()
and only gets replaced after the call. This creates a window, during which an asynchronous fault path might hit UAF:core, holding
group->mutexfault path, nogroup->mutex
========================== ===========================xa_reserve() ,-- old handle stays published no-op, the slot is occupied | __iommu_group_set_domain() | driver attach/detach ops | iopf_queue_flush_dev() | | iommu_attach_handle_get() | reads old_handle xa_store(new entry) `-- window closes mutex_unlock() kfree(old_handle) [caller] UAF: old_handle->domain->iopf_handler()Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Replace the
xa_reserve()withxa_store(XA_ZERO_ENTRY)to unpublishthe old
Quoted 22 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 7 lines
handle.
Fixes 8519e689834a ("iommu: Extend domain attach group with handlesupport")
Quoted 6 lines
Reviewed-by Kevin Tian <[email protected]>btw I just realized that neither old code nor this fix can actually support replacement with lossless fault handling, but I don't recall whether it was the original goal (then destroyed by a following change) or intended to be a future enhancement...
There was a related discussion[1]. With this patch, a page request in the replace window gets
IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_INVALIDinstead of being serviced - spec only says re-issuing the same PRG won't succeed unless the mapping changes, it doesn't forbid retry. So I think this is just a more conservative instance of the failure case Jason already called OK in [1], not a new hazard.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
iommu/[email protected]/
I called using either the old or new translation OK, using neither seems suboptimal. So returning
IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_INVALIDdoesn't sound ideal..
This probably need a RCU so the old domain can continue to be referenced by in-fly faults in that window...
Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] iommu: Unpublish the old attach handle before the group replace callback
In reply to Jason GunthorpeQuoted 55 lines · Jason Gunthorpe
Quoted 54 lines · Yi Liu
Quoted 39 lines · Kevin
Quoted 30 lines
From: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2026 5:52 AM
iommu_replace_group_handle()looks like it hides the detaching handle ahead of the driver callback. But in fact,xa_reserve()callsxa_cmpxchg(), which stores only when the current entry matches @old=NULL. For a replace, there must be an entry sitting there by definition (i.e. @old cannot be NULL), so the compare fails,XA_ZERO_ENTRYis never written, and the call decays into a plain read.Therefore, the old handle stays published during
__iommu_group_set_domain()
and only gets replaced after the call. This creates a window, during which an asynchronous fault path might hit UAF:core, holding
group->mutexfault path, nogroup->mutex
========================== ===========================
xa_reserve(),-- old handle stays published
no-op, the slot is occupied |
__iommu_group_set_domain()|
driver attach/detach ops |
iopf_queue_flush_dev()|
|iommu_attach_handle_get()
| readsold_handle
xa_store(new entry)`-- window closes
mutex_unlock()
kfree(old_handle)[caller]
UAF:old_handle->domain->iopf_handler()Quoted 8 lines
Replace the
xa_reserve()withxa_store(XA_ZERO_ENTRY)to unpublish the old handle.Fixes 8519e689834a ("iommu: Extend domain attach group with handlesupport")
Quoted 6 lines
Reviewed-by Kevin Tian <[email protected]>btw I just realized that neither old code nor this fix can actually support replacement with lossless fault handling, but I don't recall whether it was the original goal (then destroyed by a following change) or intended to be a future enhancement...
There was a related discussion[1]. With this patch, a page request in the replace window gets
IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_INVALIDinstead of being serviced - spec only says re-issuing the same PRG won't succeed unless the mapping changes, it doesn't forbid retry. So I think this is just a more conservative instance of the failure case Jason already called OK in [1], not a new hazard.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I called using either the old or new translation OK, using neither seems suboptimal. So returning
IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_INVALIDdoesn't sound ideal..
I see. maybe we can have a interim state for the replace window. This state responds PageRequests with success for the device. The device shall retry DMA and re-trigger PageRequests again. Once the replacement is done, PageRequests should be forwarded to the correct domain and get resolved.
Regards,
Yi Liu
Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] iommu: Unpublish the old attach handle before the group replace callback
Quoted 9 lines · Yi Liu
Quoted 3 lines
I called using either the old or new translation OK, using neither seems suboptimal. So returning
IOMMU_PAGE_RESP_INVALIDdoesn't sound ideal..I see. maybe we can have a interim state for the replace window. This state responds PageRequests with success for the device. The device shall retry DMA and re-trigger PageRequests again. Once the replacement is done, PageRequests should be forwarded to the correct domain and get resolved.
Yeah, maybe we can drop in a dummy domain that does that somehow..
But that seems like another series after this
Jason
Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] iommu: Unpublish the old attach handle before the group replace callback
In reply to Nicolin ChenQuoted 29 lines · Nicolin Chen
iommu_replace_group_handle()looks like it hides the detaching handle ahead of the driver callback. But in fact,xa_reserve()callsxa_cmpxchg(), which stores only when the current entry matches @old=NULL. For a replace, there must be an entry sitting there by definition (i.e. @old cannot be NULL), so the compare fails,XA_ZERO_ENTRYis never written, and the call decays into a plain read.Therefore, the old handle stays published during
__iommu_group_set_domain()and only gets replaced after the call. This creates a window, during which an asynchronous fault path might hit UAF:core, holding
group->mutexfault path, nogroup->mutex
========================== ===========================xa_reserve() ,-- old handle stays published no-op, the slot is occupied | __iommu_group_set_domain() | driver attach/detach ops | iopf_queue_flush_dev() | | iommu_attach_handle_get() | reads old_handle xa_store(new entry) `-- window closes mutex_unlock() kfree(old_handle) [caller] UAF: old_handle->domain->iopf_handler()Replace the
xa_reserve()withxa_store(XA_ZERO_ENTRY)to unpublish the old handle.
Quoted 7 lines
Fixes 8519e689834a ("iommu: Extend domain attach group with handle support")Assisted-by LLMSigned-off-by Nicolin Chen<[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 23 +++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
This doesn't fix the same-domain replace issue, which can still result in a use-after-free bug. I agree that this needs a separate lifetime mechanism as stated in the cover letter. But is it possible to prevent the same-domain replace case from going through this interface?
For this patch alone,
Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] iommu: Unpublish the old attach handle before the group replace callback
Quoted 39 lines · Baolu Lu
Quoted 30 lines · Nicolin Chen
iommu_replace_group_handle()looks like it hides the detaching handle ahead of the driver callback. But in fact,xa_reserve()callsxa_cmpxchg(), which stores only when the current entry matches @old=NULL. For a replace, there must be an entry sitting there by definition (i.e. @old cannot be NULL), so the compare fails,XA_ZERO_ENTRYis never written, and the call decays into a plain read.Therefore, the old handle stays published during
__iommu_group_set_domain()and only gets replaced after the call. This creates a window, during which an asynchronous fault path might hit UAF:core, holding group->mutex fault path, no
group->mutex========================== ===========================xa_reserve() ,-- old handle stays published no-op, the slot is occupied | __iommu_group_set_domain() |
driver attach/detach ops | iopf_queue_flush_dev() |
|iommu_attach_handle_get()| readsold_handlexa_store(new entry)`-- window closesmutex_unlock()
kfree(old_handle) [caller]
UAF: old_handle->domain-Quoted 1 line
iopf_handler()Replace the
xa_reserve()withxa_store(XA_ZERO_ENTRY)to unpublish the old handle.Quoted 7 lines
Fixes 8519e689834a ("iommu: Extend domain attach group with handle support")Assisted-by LLMSigned-off-by Nicolin Chen<[email protected]>---
drivers/iommu/iommu.c| 23 +++++++++++++----------1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Quoted 4 lines
This doesn't fix the same-domain replace issue, which can still result in a use-after-free bug. I agree that this needs a separate lifetime mechanism as stated in the cover letter. But is it possible to prevent the same-domain replace case from going through this interface?
fwiw, iommufd already guards this at the device-replace layer
(iommufd_device_do_replace() short-circuits when hwpt == old_hwpt) [1],
so IOMMUFD callers can't currently trigger this. But that's a caller-side convention, not something iommu_replace_group_handle()/iommu_replace_device_pasid() enforce themselves - so it's still reachable if a future/other caller doesn't do the same check. Worth
deciding whether to push the guard down into the core API, or document
it as a caller contract.
Regards,
Yi Liu
Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] iommu: Unpublish the old attach handle before the group replace callback
Quoted 6 lines · Yi Liu
Quoted 4 lines · Baolu Lu
This doesn't fix the same-domain replace issue, which can still result in a use-after-free bug. I agree that this needs a separate lifetime mechanism as stated in the cover letter. But is it possible to prevent the same-domain replace case from going through this interface?
Quoted 9 lines
fwiw, iommufd already guards this at the device-replace layer (
iommufd_device_do_replace()short-circuits when hwpt ==old_hwpt) [1], so IOMMUFD callers can't currently trigger this. But that's a caller-side convention, not something iommu_replace_group_handle()/iommu_replace_device_pasid() enforce themselves
- so it's still
reachable if a future/other caller doesn't do the same check. Worth deciding whether to push the guard down into the core API, or document it as a caller contract.
I can add a fifth patch. Please see if it looks good to you.
Subject: [PATCH] iommu: Reject a same-domain replace in the attach handle APIs
Both iommu_replace_group_handle() and iommu_replace_device_pasid() skip the driver callback when the new domain is the one currently attached. In that case, nothing flushes the pending faults that may still be holding the old handle. Then, the caller frees the old handle once the replace returns, so such a fault would hit a use-after-free.
No caller does this today, since iommufd_device_do_replace() returns early when the new hwpt is the old one. However, it is only a caller convention, which neither API enforces.
Reject a same-domain replace in both APIs with a WARN_ON, and document it in their kernel-docs.
--- drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
drivers/iommu/iommu.c +27 -7
@@ -3716,6 +3716,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_attach_device_pasid);* Caller should always provide a new handle to avoid race with the paths * that have lockless reference to handle if it intends to pass a valid handle. * +* The @domain must not be the domain currently attached to the @pasid. Such a +* same-domain replace would skip the driver callback flushing pending faults. +* Then, those faults could use the old handle after the caller frees it. +* * Return 0 on success, or an error. */ int iommu_replace_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
@@ -3785,15 +3789,17 @@ int iommu_replace_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain, } curr_domain =pasid_array_entry_to_domain (curr); - ret =0 ; - -if (curr_domain != domain) { - ret =__iommu_set_group_pasid (domain, group, - pasid, curr_domain); -if (ret) - entry = curr;/* restore the old handle */ +/* Same as iommu_replace_group_handle(), reject a same-domain replace */ +if (WARN_ON (curr_domain == domain)) { + entry = curr;/* restore the old handle */ + ret = -EINVAL ; + goto out_store; } + ret =__iommu_set_group_pasid (domain, group, pasid, curr_domain); +if (ret) + entry = curr;/* restore the old handle */ + out_store:/* * The xa_store() above reserved the memory, and the group->mutex
@@ -3985,6 +3991,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommu_detach_group_handle, "IOMMUFD_INTERNAL");* * Caller should always provide a new handle to avoid race with the paths * that have lockless reference to handle. +* +* The @new_domain must not be the domain currently attached to the group. Such +* a same-domain replace would skip the driver callback flushing pending faults. +* Then, those faults could use the old handle after the caller frees it. */ int iommu_replace_group_handle(struct iommu_group *group, struct iommu_domain *new_domain,
@@ -3997,6 +4007,16 @@ int iommu_replace_group_handle(struct iommu_group *group,return -EINVAL ;mutex_lock (&group->mutex); +/* +* A same-domain replace would skip the driver callback flushing pending +* faults. Then, those faults could use the old handle after the caller +* frees it. +*/ +if (WARN_ON (group->domain == new_domain)) { + ret = -EINVAL ; + goto err_unlock; + } + entry =iommu_make_pasid_array_entry (new_domain, handle);/* * iommu_attach_handle_get() runs without the group mutex, so unpublish
Signature · 2 lines
Thanks Nicolin
Re: [PATCH v1 3/4] iommu: Unpublish the old attach handle before the group replace callback
Quoted 96 lines · Nicolin Chen
Quoted 5 lines · Yi Liu
Quoted 4 lines · Baolu Lu
This doesn't fix the same-domain replace issue, which can still result in a use-after-free bug. I agree that this needs a separate lifetime mechanism as stated in the cover letter. But is it possible to prevent the same-domain replace case from going through this interface?
Quoted 9 lines
fwiw, iommufd already guards this at the device-replace layer (
iommufd_device_do_replace()short-circuits when hwpt ==old_hwpt) [1], so IOMMUFD callers can't currently trigger this. But that's a caller-side convention, not something iommu_replace_group_handle()/iommu_replace_device_pasid() enforce themselves
- so it's still
reachable if a future/other caller doesn't do the same check. Worth deciding whether to push the guard down into the core API, or document it as a caller contract.I can add a fifth patch. Please see if it looks good to you.
Subject: [PATCH] iommu: Reject a same-domain replace in the attach handle APIs
Both
iommu_replace_group_handle()andiommu_replace_device_pasid()skip the driver callback when the new domain is the one currently attached. In that case, nothing flushes the pending faults that may still be holding the old handle. Then, the caller frees the old handle once the replace returns, so such a fault would hit a use-after-free.No caller does this today, since
iommufd_device_do_replace()returns early when the new hwpt is the old one. However, it is only a caller convention, which neither API enforces.Reject a same-domain replace in both APIs with a
WARN_ON, and document it in their kernel-docs.Suggested-by Lu Baolu<[email protected]>Signed-off-by Nicolin Chen<[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)drivers/iommu/iommu.c +20
-7@@ -3716,6 +3716,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_attach_device_pasid);* Caller should always provide a new handle to avoid race with the paths * that have lockless reference to handle if it intends to pass a valid handle. * +* The @domain must not be the domain currently attached to the @pasid. Such a +* same-domain replace would skip the driver callback flushing pending faults. +* Then, those faults could use the old handle after the caller frees it. +* * Return 0 on success, or an error. */ int iommu_replace_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,@@ -3785,15 +3789,17 @@ int iommu_replace_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain, } curr_domain =pasid_array_entry_to_domain (curr); - ret =0 ; - -if (curr_domain != domain) { - ret =__iommu_set_group_pasid (domain, group, - pasid, curr_domain); -if (ret) - entry = curr;/* restore the old handle */ +/* Same as iommu_replace_group_handle(), reject a same-domain replace */ +if (WARN_ON (curr_domain == domain)) { + entry = curr;/* restore the old handle */ + ret = -EINVAL ; + goto out_store; } + ret =__iommu_set_group_pasid (domain, group, pasid, curr_domain); +if (ret) + entry = curr;/* restore the old handle */ + out_store:/* * The xa_store() above reserved the memory, and the group->mutex @@ -3985,6 +3991,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(iommu_detach_group_handle, "IOMMUFD_INTERNAL");* * Caller should always provide a new handle to avoid race with the paths * that have lockless reference to handle. +* +* The @new_domain must not be the domain currently attached to the group. Such +* a same-domain replace would skip the driver callback flushing pending faults. +* Then, those faults could use the old handle after the caller frees it. */ int iommu_replace_group_handle(struct iommu_group *group, struct iommu_domain *new_domain,@@ -3997,6 +4007,16 @@ int iommu_replace_group_handle(struct iommu_group *group,return -EINVAL ;mutex_lock (&group->mutex); +/* +* A same-domain replace would skip the driver callback flushing pending +* faults. Then, those faults could use the old handle after the caller
drivers/iommu/iommu.c int iommu_replace_group_handle(struct iommu_group *group, · line 4022
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/iommu/iommu.c +7
-0+* frees it. +*/ +if (WARN_ON (group->domain == new_domain)) { + ret = -EINVAL ; + goto err_unlock; + } + entry =iommu_make_pasid_array_entry (new_domain, handle);/* * iommu_attach_handle_get() runs without the group mutex, so unpublish
I am fine with this change.
Thanks,
baolu
PATCH 4/4 iommu: Unpublish the old attach handle before the PASID replace callback
In reply to Nicolin ChenSimilar to iommu_replace_group_handle(), iommu_replace_device_pasid() has the same inert reserve as the group path and the UAF window:
core, holding group->mutex fault path, no group->mutex
========================== ===========================
xa_cmpxchg() ,-- old handle stays published
no-op, the slot is occupied |
__iommu_set_group_pasid() |
driver attach/detach ops |
iopf_queue_flush_dev() |
| iommu_attach_handle_get()
| reads old_handle
xa_store(new entry) `-- window closes
mutex_unlock()
kfree(old_handle) [caller]
UAF: old_handle->domain->iopf_handler()Store XA_ZERO_ENTRY outright, just as the group path now does.
--- drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
drivers/iommu/iommu.c +12 -7
@@ -3751,8 +3751,13 @@ int iommu_replace_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain, } entry =iommu_make_pasid_array_entry (domain, handle); - curr =xa_cmpxchg (&group->pasid_array, pasid,NULL , -XA_ZERO_ENTRY ,GFP_KERNEL ); +/* +* iommu_attach_handle_get() runs without the group mutex, so unpublish +* the old handle before the driver callback: a fault must not resolve +* to either domain while the switch is in progress. This reserves the +* slot too, so the store below cannot fail. +*/ + curr =xa_store (&group->pasid_array, pasid,XA_ZERO_ENTRY ,GFP_KERNEL );if (xa_is_err (curr)) { ret =xa_err (curr); goto out_unlock;
@@ -3776,7 +3781,7 @@ int iommu_replace_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,if (curr == entry) {WARN_ON (1 ); ret = -EINVAL ; - goto out_unlock; + goto out_store; } curr_domain =pasid_array_entry_to_domain (curr);
@@ -3786,16 +3791,16 @@ int iommu_replace_device_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain, ret =__iommu_set_group_pasid (domain, group, pasid, curr_domain);if (ret) - goto out_unlock; + entry = curr;/* restore the old handle */ } +out_store:/* -* The above xa_cmpxchg() reserved the memory, and the -* group->mutex is held, this cannot fail. +* The xa_store() above reserved the memory, and the group->mutex +* is held, this cannot fail. */ WARN_ON (xa_is_err (xa_store (&group->pasid_array, pasid, entry,GFP_KERNEL ))); - out_unlock:mutex_unlock (&group->mutex);return ret;
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
RE: [PATCH v1 4/4] iommu: Unpublish the old attach handle before the PASID replace callback
Quoted 21 lines
From: Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2026 5:52 AMSimilar to
iommu_replace_group_handle(),iommu_replace_device_pasid()has the same inert reserve as the group path and the UAF window:core, holding
group->mutexfault path, nogroup->mutex
========================== ===========================xa_cmpxchg() ,-- old handle stays published no-op, the slot is occupied | __iommu_set_group_pasid() | driver attach/detach ops | iopf_queue_flush_dev() | | iommu_attach_handle_get() | reads old_handle xa_store(new entry) `-- window closes mutex_unlock() kfree(old_handle) [caller] UAF: old_handle->domain->iopf_handler()
Quoted 6 lines
Store
XA_ZERO_ENTRYoutright, just as the group path now does.Fixes 8a9e1e773f60 ("iommu: Introduce a replace API for device pasid")Assisted-by LLMSigned-off-by Nicolin Chen <[email protected]>
Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] iommu: Unpublish the old attach handle before the PASID replace callback
In reply to Nicolin ChenQuoted 20 lines · Nicolin Chen
Similar to
iommu_replace_group_handle(),iommu_replace_device_pasid()has the same inert reserve as the group path and the UAF window:core, holding
group->mutexfault path, nogroup->mutex
========================== ===========================xa_cmpxchg() ,-- old handle stays published no-op, the slot is occupied | __iommu_set_group_pasid() | driver attach/detach ops | iopf_queue_flush_dev() | | iommu_attach_handle_get() | reads old_handle xa_store(new entry) `-- window closes mutex_unlock() kfree(old_handle) [caller] UAF: old_handle->domain->iopf_handler()Store
XA_ZERO_ENTRYoutright, just as the group path now does.
Quoted 7 lines
Fixes 8a9e1e773f60 ("iommu: Introduce a replace API for device pasid")Assisted-by LLMSigned-off-by Nicolin Chen<[email protected]>--- drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Quoted 20 lines · Nicolin Chen
Jason pointed out an issue in the attach handle replacing path:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/[email protected]/When an attachment is detached or replaced, the IOMMU core can still leave the outgoing attach handle published while calling into the driver. A fault report looks up the handle without the group mutex, so it can find the old handle after the driver's fault flush and just before the caller frees it.
These four patches unpublish the outgoing handle before a driver callback for both group and PASID detach and replace operations. Both replace paths store
XA_ZERO_ENTRYto reserve the slot and restore the old entry on error.This blocks new lookups, but does not retire a fault that already obtained the old handle. The driver must still synchronize those readers before the handle is freed. A same-domain replacement skips the driver callback, so it still needs a separate lifetime mechanism or fence.
This is on GitHub:
https://github.com/nicolinc/iommufd/commits/fix_iommu_attach_handle-v1
Quoted 7 lines
Nicolin Chen (4):
iommu: Unpublish the attach handle before the group detach callback
iommu: Unpublish the attach handle before the PASID detach callback
iommu: Unpublish the old attach handle before the group replace
callback
iommu: Unpublish the old attach handle before the PASID replace
callback
Baolu/Kevin/Yi,
Would it be possible for you to take a look at these fixes?
Thanks
Nicolin
Quoted 12 lines · Nicolin Chen
Jason pointed out an issue in the attach handle replacing path:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/[email protected]/When an attachment is detached or replaced, the IOMMU core can still leave the outgoing attach handle published while calling into the driver. A fault report looks up the handle without the group mutex, so it can find the old handle after the driver's fault flush and just before the caller frees it.
These four patches unpublish the outgoing handle before a driver callback for both group and PASID detach and replace operations. Both replace paths store
XA_ZERO_ENTRYto reserve the slot and restore the old entry on error.
Quoted 7 lines
This blocks new lookups, but does not retire a fault that already obtained the old handle. The driver must still synchronize those readers before the handle is freed. A same-domain replacement skips the driver callback, so it still needs a separate lifetime mechanism or fence.
This is on GitHub:
https://github.com/nicolinc/iommufd/commits/fix_iommu_attach_handle-v1
this series LGTM.
Quoted 13 lines
Nicolin Chen (4):
iommu: Unpublish the attach handle before the group detach callback
iommu: Unpublish the attach handle before the PASID detach callback
iommu: Unpublish the old attach handle before the group replace
callback
iommu: Unpublish the old attach handle before the PASID replace
callbackdrivers/iommu/iommu.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)base-commit:
cee9395acd8043be0644b25c34bfa86623f2b935