dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add DHCOM PicoITX and DHCOM DRC02 boards [Klartext]
From: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 9:50 PM
Quoted 37 lines · Christoph Niedermaier
Quoted 36 lines
Add DH electronics DHCOM PicoITX and DHCOM DRC02 boards.
Signed-off-by Christoph Niedermaier <[email protected]>Cc Shawn Guo <[email protected]>To: [email protected]
---
V2: Remove line with fsl,imx6s on the DRC02 Board--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml +6
-0@@ -407,6 +407,12 @@ properties: - const: dfi,fs700e-m60 - const: fsl,imx6dl + - description: i.MX6DL DHCOM PicoITX Board + items: + - const: dh,imx6dl-dhcom-picoitx + - const: dh,imx6dl-dhcom-som + - const: fsl,imx6dl + - description: i.MX6DL Gateworks Ventana Boards items: - enum:@@ -458,6 +464,12 @@ properties: - const: toradex,colibri_imx6dl # Colibri iMX6 Module - const: fsl,imx6dl
Quoted 7 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml properties: · line 471
Quoted 5 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml +5
-0+ - description: i.MX6S DHCOM DRC02 Board + items: + - const: dh,imx6s-dhcom-drc02 + - const: dh,imx6s-dhcom-som + - const: fsl,imx6dlfsl,imx6s?
In the first version I had here an additional line with "fsl,imx6s", but currently the kernel isn't supporting that compatible. The i.MX6 Solo is currently supported by "fsl,imx6dl". So my idea was to add both "fsl,imx6dl" and "fsl,imx6s" to match it maybe on a later kernel version. If there is no match with the Solo now, it will fall back to the i.MX6 DualLite. That is why I had both fsl,imx6s and fsl,imx6dl in that order. On Fabio's advice, I removed the line with "fsl,imx6s" in version 2.
Is this what you meant by your comment?
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml +1
-1+ - description: i.MX6SL based Boards items: - enum: --2.11.0
Regards
Christoph