Enumerated types in lttng-ust traces?
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 6 lines · * John Steele Scott ([email protected]) wrote:
It seems that the CTF supports enumerations, and babeltrace has support for pretty-printing them. But how do you get lttng-ust to emit them? Is this possible?
Right now I'm just using
ctf_integer, but it seems like there should be way to show human-readable enumeration names in the trace.
Hi John,
You are right, CTF supports enumerations. Currently, neither lttng-modules nor lttng-ust allow emitting those enumerations from tracepoints (it's just not been implemented yet).
We'd have to add that to LTTng-UST tracepoints, e.g., something resembling to:
TRACEPOINT_ENUM(enum_name,
TP_ENUM_V(SOMENAMEA) /* value 0 */
TP_ENUM_V(SOMENAMEB) /* value 1 */
TP_ENUM_V(SOMENAMEC, 5) /* value 5 */
TP_ENUM_V(SOMENAMED) /* value 6 */
TP_ENUM_R(SOMENAMEE, 8, 10) /* range 8 to 10 (inclusive) */
TP_ENUM_V(SOMENAMEF) /* value 11 */)
then:
TRACEPOINT_EVENT(prog_module, event,
TP_ARGS(int, someint),
TP_FIELDS(
ctf_enum(enum_name, int, fieldname, someint)
))
where ctf_enum would be:
ctf_enum(name of enumeration,
type of enumeration container, name of the field,
name of the TP_ARGS entry to use as source
)
I did early experiments with this in lttng-modules (code unfinished and unused at this stage). You can dig it up in the files:
probes/lttng-type-list.hprobes/lttng-types.h
of lttng-modules. Please keep in mind that these are unfinished and might need a lot of changes to get straight.
Thoughts ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
Signature · 4 lines
Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com