Skip to contentSkip to conversation

ARM: OMAP2+: Fix onenand initialization to avoid filesystem corruption

PATCH In review Ivaylo Dimitrov 5 participants 11 messages Feb 5, 2016 – Feb 28 1 message not in the archive

Subsystems (7)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 ARM: OMAP2+: Fix onenand initialization to avoid filesystem corruption

In reply to a message not in the archive

Commit <e7b11dc7b77bfce0a351230a5feeadc1d0bba997> ("ARM: OMAP2+: Fix onenand rate detection to avoid filesystem corruption") partially fixed onenand configuration when GPMC module is reset. Finish the job by also providing the correct values in ONENAND_REG_SYS_CFG1 register.

---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c +3 -3
index 7b76ce0..8633c70 100644
@@ -101,10 +101,8 @@ static void omap2_onenand_set_async_mode(void __iomem *onenand_base)
 
 static void set_onenand_cfg(void __iomem *onenand_base)
 {
-	u32 reg;
+	u32 reg = ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_RDY | ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_INT;
 
-	reg = readw(onenand_base + ONENAND_REG_SYS_CFG1);
-	reg &= ~((0x7 << ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_BRL_SHIFT) | (0x7 << 9));
 	reg |=	(latency << ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_BRL_SHIFT) |
 		ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_BL_16;
 	if (onenand_flags & ONENAND_FLAG_SYNCREAD)
@@ -123,6 +121,7 @@ static void set_onenand_cfg(void __iomem *onenand_base)
 		reg |= ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_VHF;
 	else
 		reg &= ~ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_VHF;
+
 	writew(reg, onenand_base + ONENAND_REG_SYS_CFG1);
 }
 
@@ -289,6 +288,7 @@ static int omap2_onenand_setup_async(void __iomem *onenand_base)
 		}
 	}
 
+	onenand_async.sync_write = true;
 	omap2_onenand_calc_async_timings(&t);
 
 	ret = gpmc_cs_program_settings(gpmc_onenand_data->cs, &onenand_async);
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
maintainer
#2 lore raw
Quoted 4 lines · Ivaylo Dimitrov

Commit <e7b11dc7b77bfce0a351230a5feeadc1d0bba997> ("ARM: OMAP2+: Fix onenand rate detection to avoid filesystem corruption") partially fixed onenand configuration when GPMC module is reset. Finish the job by also providing the correct values in ONENAND_REG_SYS_CFG1 register.

OK. So probably the INT or RDY polarity made the ECC not work.

Aaro, care to dump out also the nolo configured CFG1 value from n8x0 and n9(50)?

You can do it by adding something like this to the beginning of set_onenand_cfg():

pr_info("CFG1: 0x%04x\n", readw(onenand_base + ONENAND_REG_SYS_CFG1));

And presumably the values are the same as on n900. If not, we should do the legacy file system flash test on all of them before committing this fix.

Regards,

Tony

Quoted 40 lines
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c +3 -3
index 7b76ce0..8633c70 100644
@@ -101,10 +101,8 @@ static void omap2_onenand_set_async_mode(void __iomem *onenand_base)
 
 static void set_onenand_cfg(void __iomem *onenand_base)
 {
-	u32 reg;
+	u32 reg = ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_RDY | ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_INT;
 
-	reg = readw(onenand_base + ONENAND_REG_SYS_CFG1);
-	reg &= ~((0x7 << ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_BRL_SHIFT) | (0x7 << 9));
 	reg |=	(latency << ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_BRL_SHIFT) |
 		ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_BL_16;
 	if (onenand_flags & ONENAND_FLAG_SYNCREAD)
@@ -123,6 +121,7 @@ static void set_onenand_cfg(void __iomem *onenand_base)
 		reg |= ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_VHF;
 	else
 		reg &= ~ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_VHF;
+
 	writew(reg, onenand_base + ONENAND_REG_SYS_CFG1);
 }
 
@@ -289,6 +288,7 @@ static int omap2_onenand_setup_async(void __iomem *onenand_base)
 		}
 	}
 
+	onenand_async.sync_write = true;
 	omap2_onenand_calc_async_timings(&t);
 
 	ret = gpmc_cs_program_settings(gpmc_onenand_data->cs, &onenand_async);
Signature · 1 line
1.9.1
#3 lore raw

Hi

Quoted 3 lines · Tony Lindgren

OK. So probably the INT or RDY polarity made the ECC not work.

Well, ECC disable bit (ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_NO_ECC) was set as well, so most probably it was the bugger :)

Quoted 6 lines

Aaro, care to dump out also the nolo configured CFG1 value from n8x0 and n9(50)?

You can do it by adding something like this to the beginning of set_onenand_cfg():

Also, do not forget to restore HWMOD_INIT_NO_RESET in gpmc_hwmod in question and (maybe) revert e7b11dc7b77bfce0a351230a5feeadc1d0bba997.

Regards,
Ivo

maintainer
#4 lore raw
Quoted 9 lines · Ivaylo Dimitrov

Hi

Quoted 3 lines · Tony Lindgren

OK. So probably the INT or RDY polarity made the ECC not work.

Well, ECC disable bit (ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_NO_ECC) was set as well, so most probably it was the bugger :)

Oh OK that explains.

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 6 lines

Aaro, care to dump out also the nolo configured CFG1 value from n8x0 and n9(50)?

You can do it by adding something like this to the beginning of set_onenand_cfg():

Also, do not forget to restore HWMOD_INIT_NO_RESET in gpmc_hwmod in question and (maybe) revert e7b11dc7b77bfce0a351230a5feeadc1d0bba997.

Probably just enabling CONFIG_OMAP_GPMC_DEBUG allows dumping the GPMC configuration. And it sounds like it's a good idea to have this patch enabled.

Regards,

Tony

maintainer
#5 lore raw
In reply to Tony Lindgren

Hi,

Quoted 11 lines · Tony Lindgren
Quoted 4 lines · Ivaylo Dimitrov

Commit <e7b11dc7b77bfce0a351230a5feeadc1d0bba997> ("ARM: OMAP2+: Fix onenand rate detection to avoid filesystem corruption") partially fixed onenand configuration when GPMC module is reset. Finish the job by also providing the correct values in ONENAND_REG_SYS_CFG1 register.

OK. So probably the INT or RDY polarity made the ECC not work.

Aaro, care to dump out also the nolo configured CFG1 value from n8x0 and n9(50)?

Quoted 8 lines

You can do it by adding something like this to the beginning of set_onenand_cfg():

pr_info("CFG1: 0x%04x\n", readw(onenand_base + ONENAND_REG_SYS_CFG1));

And presumably the values are the same as on n900. If not, we should do the legacy file system flash test on all of them before committing this fix.

I got these (with CONFIG_OMAP_GPMC_DEBUG also enabled):

N800:

[    2.803100] CFG1: 0x46c0
[    3.150115] CFG1: 0x06c0

N810:

[    2.802368] CFG1: 0x46c0
[    3.148620] CFG1: 0x06c0

N900:

[    4.965576] CFG1: 0x46c0
[    5.333740] CFG1: 0x06c0

N950:

[    4.217193] CFG1: 0x66c4
[    4.583221] CFG1: 0x06c0

N9:

[    4.212677] CFG1: 0x66c4
[    4.578613] CFG1: 0x06c0

A.

maintainer
#6 lore raw
Quoted 29 lines · Aaro Koskinen

Hi,

Quoted 11 lines · Tony Lindgren
Quoted 4 lines · Ivaylo Dimitrov

Commit <e7b11dc7b77bfce0a351230a5feeadc1d0bba997> ("ARM: OMAP2+: Fix onenand rate detection to avoid filesystem corruption") partially fixed onenand configuration when GPMC module is reset. Finish the job by also providing the correct values in ONENAND_REG_SYS_CFG1 register.

OK. So probably the INT or RDY polarity made the ECC not work.

Aaro, care to dump out also the nolo configured CFG1 value from n8x0 and n9(50)?

Quoted 8 lines

You can do it by adding something like this to the beginning of set_onenand_cfg():

pr_info("CFG1: 0x%04x\n", readw(onenand_base + ONENAND_REG_SYS_CFG1));

And presumably the values are the same as on n900. If not, we should do the legacy file system flash test on all of them before committing this fix.

I got these (with CONFIG_OMAP_GPMC_DEBUG also enabled):

N800:

[    2.803100] CFG1: 0x46c0
[    3.150115] CFG1: 0x06c0
Quoted 7 lines

N810:

[    2.802368] CFG1: 0x46c0
[    3.148620] CFG1: 0x06c0

N900:

[    4.965576] CFG1: 0x46c0
[    5.333740] CFG1: 0x06c0

Thanks, so these all should be fine with Ivaylo's patch.

Quoted 7 lines

N950:

[    4.217193] CFG1: 0x66c4
[    4.583221] CFG1: 0x06c0

N9:

[    4.212677] CFG1: 0x66c4
[    4.578613] CFG1: 0x06c0

Aaro, care to do one more test on n9(50) like Ivaylo posted earlier:

1. Flash original maemo rootfs

2. Boot mainline kernel with Ivaylo's patch and mount onenand

3. Boot original maemo kernel and check dmesg there's no file corruption

Also.. There's a chance somebody has created a onenand file system with recent mainline kernels that did the reset and disabled ECC. So with Ivaylo's patch fixing that, those may not mount properly any longer. Most likely people just keep their maemo rootfs there though with the MMC being available.

Regards,

Tony

#7 lore raw

Hi,

Quoted 6 lines · Tony Lindgren

Also.. There's a chance somebody has created a onenand file system with recent mainline kernels that did the reset and disabled ECC. So with Ivaylo's patch fixing that, those may not mount properly any longer. Most likely people just keep their maemo rootfs there though with the MMC being available.

I guess this is possible, but what worries me more is that the longer the patch is not pushed, the higher the chance somebody to end-up with broken rootfs. Wouldn't it be better to push it, thus preventing that happening?

BTW the differences for N9/50 come from ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_HF bit and ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_BRL_6 vs ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_BRL_4. Both are changed (later in the code) anyway, so I guess it is safe to reset them to default values.

Or, maybe the correct fix is to issue RESET command to onenand controller after GPMC reset? RESET command is supposed to put all the bits to their default values.

Ivo.

maintainer Tested-by on v1 1/1
#9 lore raw
In reply to Ivaylo Dimitrov

Hi,

Quoted 6 lines · Ivaylo Dimitrov

Commit <e7b11dc7b77bfce0a351230a5feeadc1d0bba997> ("ARM: OMAP2+: Fix onenand rate detection to avoid filesystem corruption") partially fixed onenand configuration when GPMC module is reset. Finish the job by also providing the correct values in ONENAND_REG_SYS_CFG1 register.

I tested this on N950 by creating ubifs file system with stock kernel, then reading & writing to it with mainline kernel, and then again verifying the fs is good with the stock kernel. Note that onenand does not work properly on N950 at the moment unless ONENAND_HAS_CACHE_PROGRAM is disabled by patching, but that's an issue unrelated to this patch.

A.

Quoted 43 lines
---
 arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c +3 -3
index 7b76ce0..8633c70 100644
@@ -101,10 +101,8 @@ static void omap2_onenand_set_async_mode(void __iomem *onenand_base)
 
 static void set_onenand_cfg(void __iomem *onenand_base)
 {
-	u32 reg;
+	u32 reg = ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_RDY | ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_INT;
 
-	reg = readw(onenand_base + ONENAND_REG_SYS_CFG1);
-	reg &= ~((0x7 << ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_BRL_SHIFT) | (0x7 << 9));
 	reg |=	(latency << ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_BRL_SHIFT) |
 		ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_BL_16;
 	if (onenand_flags & ONENAND_FLAG_SYNCREAD)
@@ -123,6 +121,7 @@ static void set_onenand_cfg(void __iomem *onenand_base)
 		reg |= ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_VHF;
 	else
 		reg &= ~ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_VHF;
+
 	writew(reg, onenand_base + ONENAND_REG_SYS_CFG1);
 }
 
@@ -289,6 +288,7 @@ static int omap2_onenand_setup_async(void __iomem *onenand_base)
 		}
 	}
 
+	onenand_async.sync_write = true;
 	omap2_onenand_calc_async_timings(&t);
 
 	ret = gpmc_cs_program_settings(gpmc_onenand_data->cs, &onenand_async);
Signature · 6 lines
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
maintainer
#8 lore raw
In reply to Ivaylo Dimitrov
Quoted 10 lines · Ivaylo Dimitrov

Hi,

Quoted 6 lines · Tony Lindgren

Also.. There's a chance somebody has created a onenand file system with recent mainline kernels that did the reset and disabled ECC. So with Ivaylo's patch fixing that, those may not mount properly any longer. Most likely people just keep their maemo rootfs there though with the MMC being available.

Quoted 3 lines

I guess this is possible, but what worries me more is that the longer the patch is not pushed, the higher the chance somebody to end-up with broken rootfs. Wouldn't it be better to push it, thus preventing that happening?

Will apply today into omap-for-v4.5/fixes with Aaro's ack. Note that Aaro found also two other error causing issues with the onenand driver, so it seems the onenand driver has been broken for years in the mainline kernel..

Quoted 3 lines

BTW the differences for N9/50 come from ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_HF bit and ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_BRL_6 vs ONENAND_SYS_CFG1_BRL_4. Both are changed (later in the code) anyway, so I guess it is safe to reset them to default values.

Yes I think we're better off having things fully configured by the kernel in the long run.

Quoted 3 lines

Or, maybe the correct fix is to issue RESET command to onenand controller after GPMC reset? RESET command is supposed to put all the bits to their default values.

Something like that could be added if needed.

Regards,

Tony

#10 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 crypto: tesmgr - allow authenc(hmac(sha224/sha384),cbc(aes)) in fips mode

In reply to a message not in the archive

The remaining combinations of AES-CBC and SHA* have already been marked as allowed. This commit does the same for SHA224 and SHA384.

---
 crypto/testmgr.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
crypto/testmgr.c +2 -0
index bf286a4f5351..b230d651f9f9 100644
@@ -4134,6 +4134,7 @@ static const struct alg_test_desc alg_test_descs[] = {
 		.alg = "authenc(hmac(sha224),cbc(aes))",
 		.generic_driver = "authenc(hmac-sha224-lib,cbc(aes-generic))",
 		.test = alg_test_aead,
+		.fips_allowed = 1,
 		.suite = {
 			.aead = __VECS(hmac_sha224_aes_cbc_tv_temp)
 		}
@@ -4196,6 +4197,7 @@ static const struct alg_test_desc alg_test_descs[] = {
 		.alg = "authenc(hmac(sha384),cbc(aes))",
 		.generic_driver = "authenc(hmac-sha384-lib,cbc(aes-generic))",
 		.test = alg_test_aead,
+		.fips_allowed = 1,
 		.suite = {
 			.aead = __VECS(hmac_sha384_aes_cbc_tv_temp)
 		}
Signature · 1 line
2.47.3
maintainer
#11 lore raw

Re: [PATCH] crypto: tesmgr - allow authenc(hmac(sha224/sha384),cbc(aes)) in fips mode

Quoted 7 lines · Aleksander Jan Bajkowski

The remaining combinations of AES-CBC and SHA* have already been marked as allowed. This commit does the same for SHA224 and SHA384.

---
 crypto/testmgr.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Patch applied. Thanks.

Signature · 3 lines
Email: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt