2.4.0-test11 (pre1, final) OOPS during boot/modprobe
2.4.0-test11-pre1 seems to have broken something.
I have no problems with test10, but test11-pre1 gives three oops messages during boot. test11-final gives the exact same OOPS messages...
Of the three, only the first one decodes to anything useful:
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address c86bd1e0
printing eip:
c4890060
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000
CPU: 0
EIP: 0010:[nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-12192/80]
EFLAGS: 00010a82
eax: c4890050 ebx: c3fcb400 ecx: c489101c edx: ffffffff
esi: c4891160 edi: c4891160 ebp: c48912d4 esp: c36fbee8
ds: 0018 es: 0018 ss: 0018
Process modprobe (pid: 201, stackpage=c36fb000)
Stack: c01b74fc c3fcb400 c489101c c3fcb400 00000000 c01b7554 c4891160 c3fcb400
c4890000 c489098c 00000001 c4890996 c4891160 c0117d2d c36fa000 08065490
08061760 bfffe164 00000001 c488d000 c488d000 c36fbf60 0000004c c48912c0
Call Trace: [pci_announce_device+44/64] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-8164/80] [pci_register_driver+68/92] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-7840/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-12288/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-9844/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-9834/80]
[nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-7840/80] [sys_init_module+1409/1568] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-24576/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-24576/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-7488/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-24576/80] [nfsd:__insmod_nfsd_O/lib/modules/2.4.0-test11/kernel/fs/nfsd/nfs+-12192/80] [system_call+51/64]
Code: 12 89 c4 c1 e2 03 89 44 24 18 89 54 24 1c 40 8b 8a c8 0f 89 The addresses are different, but the stack trace is identical, between test-11(pre1) and test11(final).
I think the oops's each correspond to a modprobe.
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.91.66/specs gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Quoted 3 lines · On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 06:10:54 -0500 (EST), [email protected] (Steven S. Dick)…
2.4.0-test11-pre1 seems to have broken something.
I have no problems with test10, but test11-pre1 gives three oops messages during boot. test11-final gives the exact same OOPS messages...
Which modutils? And if it is not 2.3.21, upgrade.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Quoted 7 lines · Keith Owens
Quoted 3 lines · On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 06:10:54 -0500 (EST), [email protected] (Steven S. Dick)…
2.4.0-test11-pre1 seems to have broken something.
I have no problems with test10, but test11-pre1 gives three oops messages during boot. test11-final gives the exact same OOPS messages...Which modutils? And if it is not 2.3.21, upgrade.
Steven probably wants to apply this patch to test11:
kernel/module.c +3 -1
@@ -480,7 +480,9 @@/* Ok, that's about all the sanity we can stomach; copy the rest. */ -if (copy_from_user (mod+1 , mod_user+1 , mod->size-sizeof (*mod))) { +if (copy_from_user ((char *)mod+mod_user_size, + (char *)mod_user+mod_user_size, + mod->size-mod_user_size)) { error = -EFAULT ; goto err3; }
_____
|_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King [email protected] --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Quoted 10 lines · Russell King
Quoted 7 lines · Keith Owens
Quoted 3 lines · On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 06:10:54 -0500 (EST), [email protected] (Steven S. Dick)…
2.4.0-test11-pre1 seems to have broken something.
I have no problems with test10, but test11-pre1 gives three oops messages during boot. test11-final gives the exact same OOPS messages...Which modutils? And if it is not 2.3.21, upgrade.
Steven probably wants to apply this patch to test11:
Upgrading to modutils 2.3.21 is easier and everybody should do that anyway to fix the local root exploits.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Quoted 2 lines · Russell King
Keith Owens writes:
Steven probably wants to apply this patch to test11:
How about we apply both that patch and this one?
Documentation/Changes renamed from Documentation/Changes.old +1 -1
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ o Gnu make 3.77 # make --version o binutils 2.9.1.0.25 # ld -v o util-linux 2.10o # kbdrate -v -o modutils 2.3.18 # insmod -V +o modutils 2.3.21 # insmod -V o e2fsprogs 1.19 # tune2fs --version o pcmcia-cs 3.1.21 # cardmgr -V o PPP 2.4.0 # pppd --version
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Quoted 5 lines · Steven S. Dick
Quoted 2 lines · Russell King
Keith Owens writes:
Steven probably wants to apply this patch to test11:How about we apply both that patch and this one?
Both already sent to Linus and Alan Cox.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/