Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Tcp/ip offload card driver

DISCUSSION Pete Zaitcev 2 participants 2 messages May 10, 2002 1 message not in the archive

lore
Share & tools
lore
#1 lore raw
In reply to a message not in the archive
Quoted 4 lines

[...]
For example, do a SpecWEB run with TUX both using on-chip-TCP and without, same networking card. Show a demonstrable gain from the on-chip-TCP implementation. I bet you can't.

NO! Doing such a test sets you up for a failure. If a vendor of the card provides an on-chip TCP, it is entirely in the vendor's interest to penalize regular TCP (for example, by failing to provide checksum offload or sane S/G segments).

I only consider fair a test of on-chip TCP compared to the best of the normal NICs.

-- Pete

#2 lore raw

From: Pete Zaitcev <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 13:55:52 -0400

Quoted 3 lines

For example, do a SpecWEB run with TUX both using on-chip-TCP and without, same networking card. Show a demonstrable gain from the on-chip-TCP implementation. I bet you can't.

NO! Doing such a test sets you up for a failure. If a vendor of the card provides an on-chip TCP, it is entirely in the vendor's interest to penalize regular TCP (for example, by failing to provide checksum offload or sane S/G segments).

I only consider fair a test of on-chip TCP compared to the best of the normal NICs.

Sorry, I should have stated this explicitly. The same card must have SG/Checksumming capability for the no-TCP-onchip portion of the test.