kernel make install - why don't we make it easy like on ia32?
I was wondering why the ia32 style of installing boot stuff like /boot/vmlinuz that done in:
arch/i386/boot/Makefile and arch/i386/boot/install.sh
isn't being done for ia64.
I'm thinking of makeing a few tweaks to the ia32 version to copy kernel stuff to /boot and /boot/efi. I've been using a hack on the top level kernel Makefile but it's a hack to do it there. The ia32 paradigm seems fine; so why isn't it done for ia64. Even after applying the ia64 patch to linux-2.4.18, a 'make install' in the top level kernel Makefile still breaks.
What gives?
-piet
Quoted 9 lines · Piet/Pete Delaney
I was wondering why the ia32 style of installing boot stuff like
/boot/vmlinuzthat done in:arch/i386/boot/Makefile and arch/i386/boot/install.shisn't being done for ia64.
Quoted 8 lines
I'm thinking of makeing a few tweaks to the ia32 version to copy kernel stuff to /boot and
/boot/efi. I've been using a hack on the top level kernelMakefilebut it's a hack to do it there. The ia32 paradigm seems fine; so why isn't it done for ia64. Even after applying the ia64 patch to linux-2.4.18, a 'make install' in the top level kernelMakefilestill breaks.What gives?
Note that on Debian ia64 the efi partition is not normally mounted. The approach we took was that kernels+initrds are dropped in /boot, and then we have a script /usr/sbin/elilo, which makes sure the efi partition contents are up to date.
Richard