backfill: accept revision arguments
cover backfill: accept revision arguments
The git backfill command assists in downloading missing blobs for blobless partial clones. However, its current version lacks some valuable functionality. It currently:
1. Only walks commits reachable from HEAD.
2. It walks all reachable commits to the full history.
3. It can focus on the current sparse-checkout definition, but otherwise it doesn't focus on a given pathspec.
All of these are being updated by this patch series, which allows rev-list options to impact the path-walk. These include:
1. Specifying a given refspec, including --all.
2. Modifying the commit walk, including --first-parent, commit ranges, or
recency using --since.
3. Modifying the set of paths to download using pathspecs.
One particularly valuable situation here is that now a user can run git backfill -- <path> to download all versions of a specific file or a specific directory, accelerating history queries within that path without downloading more than necessary. This can accelerate git blame or git log -L for these paths, where normally those commands download missing blobs one-by-one during its diff algorithms.
This patch series is organized in the following way:
1. A missing #include is added to prevent future compilation issues.
2. The test repo in t5620 is expanded to make later tests more interesting.
3. The backfill builtin parses the rev-list arguments. We test the top arguments that work as expected, though the pathspec arguments need extra work.
4. Update the path-walk logic to work efficiently with some pathspecs, such as fixed prefix pathspecs, accelerating the computation.
5. For more complicated pathspecs, do a post-filter in builtin/backfill.c instead of restricting the walk in the path-walk API.
The main goal of this series is to make such customizations possible, and to improve performance where common use cases are expected. I'm open to feedback as to whether we should consider more detailed performance analysis or whether we should wait for how users interact with these new options before overoptimizing unlikely use cases.
Thanks, -Stolee
Derrick Stolee (5):
revision: include object-name.h
t5620: prepare branched repo for revision tests
backfill: accept revision arguments
backfill: work with prefix pathspecs
path-walk: support wildcard pathspecs for blob filtering
Documentation/git-backfill.adoc | 3 + builtin/backfill.c | 19 ++- path-walk.c | 61 ++++++++++ revision.h | 1 + t/t5620-backfill.sh | 203 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 5 files changed, 279 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
base-commit: 67ad42147a7acc2af6074753ebd03d904476118f
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-2070%2Fderrickstolee%2Fbackfill-revs-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-2070/derrickstolee/backfill-revs-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/2070
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 1/5 revision: include object-name.h
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The REV_INFO_INIT macro includes a use of the DEFAULT_ABBREV macro, which is defined in object-name.h. Include it in revision.h so consumers of REV_INFO_INIT do not need to include this hidden dependency.
--- revision.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
revision.h +1 -0
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@#include "commit.h" #include "grep.h" #include "notes.h" +#include "object-name.h" #include "oidset.h" #include "pretty.h" #include "diff.h"
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH 1/5] revision: include object-name.h
Quoted 16 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The
REV_INFO_INITmacro includes a use of theDEFAULT_ABBREVmacro, which is defined inobject-name.h. Include it inrevision.hso consumers ofREV_INFO_INITdo not need to include this hidden dependency.Signed-off-by Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>--- revision.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)revision.h +0
-0
revision.h line 10
Quoted 7 lines
revision.h +1
-0@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@#include "commit.h" #include "grep.h" #include "notes.h" +#include "object-name.h" #include "oidset.h" #include "pretty.h" #include "diff.h"
OK. Other symbols REV_INFO_INIT needs are REV_SORT_IN_GRAPH_ORDER (in <commit.h>), CMIT_FMT_DEFAULT (in <pretty.h>), and STRVEC_INIT (in <strvec.h>), and all three are already included there.
Makes sense.
PATCH 2/5 t5620: prepare branched repo for revision tests
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Prepare the test infrastructure for upcoming changes that teach 'git backfill' to accept revision arguments and pathspecs.
Add test_tick before each commit in the setup loop so that commit dates are deterministic. This enables reliable testing with '--since'.
Rename the 'd/e/' directory to 'd/f/' so that the prefix 'd/f' is ambiguous with the files 'd/file.*.txt'. This exercises the subtlety in prefix pathspec matching that will be added in a later commit.
Create a branched version of the test repository (src-revs) with:
- A 'side' branch merged into main, adding s/file.{1,2}.txt with two versions (4 new blobs, 52 total from main HEAD).
- An unmerged 'other' branch adding o/file.{1,2}.txt (2 more blobs, 54 total reachable from --all).
This structure makes --all, --first-parent, and --since produce meaningfully different results when used with 'git backfill'.
--- t/t5620-backfill.sh | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
t/t5620-backfill.sh +50 -2
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup repo for object creation' ' git init src && mkdir -p src/a/b/c && - mkdir -p src/d/e && + mkdir -p src/d/f && for i in 1 2 do
@@ -26,8 +26,9 @@ test_expect_success 'setup repo for object creation' ' echo "Version $i of file a/b/$n" > src/a/b/file.$n.txt && echo "Version $i of file a/b/c/$n" > src/a/b/c/file.$n.txt && echo "Version $i of file d/$n" > src/d/file.$n.txt && - echo "Version $i of file d/e/$n" > src/d/e/file.$n.txt && + echo "Version $i of file d/f/$n" > src/d/f/file.$n.txt && git -C src add . && + test_tick && git -C src commit -m "Iteration $n" || return 1 done done
@@ -41,6 +42,53 @@ test_expect_success 'setup bare clone for server' ' git -C srv.bare config --local uploadpack.allowanysha1inwant 1 ' +# Create a version of the repo with branches for testing revision +# arguments like --all, --first-parent, and --since. +# +# main: 8 commits (linear) + merge of side branch +# 48 original blobs + 4 side blobs = 52 blobs from main HEAD +# side: 2 commits adding s/file.{1,2}.txt (v1, v2), merged into main +# other: 1 commit adding o/file.{1,2}.txt (not merged) +# 54 total blobs reachable from --all +test_expect_success 'setup branched repo for revision tests' ' + git clone src src-revs && + + # Side branch from tip of main with unique files + git -C src-revs checkout -b side HEAD && + mkdir -p src-revs/s && + echo "Side version 1 of file 1" >src-revs/s/file.1.txt && + echo "Side version 1 of file 2" >src-revs/s/file.2.txt && + test_tick && + git -C src-revs add . && + git -C src-revs commit -m "Side commit 1" && + + echo "Side version 2 of file 1" >src-revs/s/file.1.txt && + echo "Side version 2 of file 2" >src-revs/s/file.2.txt && + test_tick && + git -C src-revs add . && + git -C src-revs commit -m "Side commit 2" && + + # Merge side into main + git -C src-revs checkout main && + test_tick && + git -C src-revs merge side --no-ff -m "Merge side branch" && + + # Other branch (not merged) for --all testing + git -C src-revs checkout -b other main~1 && + mkdir -p src-revs/o && + echo "Other content 1" >src-revs/o/file.1.txt && + echo "Other content 2" >src-revs/o/file.2.txt && + test_tick && + git -C src-revs add . && + git -C src-revs commit -m "Other commit" && + + git -C src-revs checkout main && + + git clone --bare "file://$(pwd)/src-revs" srv-revs.bare && + git -C srv-revs.bare config --local uploadpack.allowfilter 1 && + git -C srv-revs.bare config --local uploadpack.allowanysha1inwant 1 +' + # do basic partial clone from "srv.bare" test_expect_success 'do partial clone 1, backfill gets all objects' ' git clone --no-checkout --filter=blob:none \
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH 3/5 backfill: accept revision arguments
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The existing implementation of 'git backfill' only includes downloading missing blobs reachable from HEAD. Advanced uses may desire more general commit limiting options, such as '--all' for all references, specifying a commit range via negative references, or specifying a recency of use such as with '--since=<date>'.
All of these options are available if we use setup_revisions() to parse the unknown arguments with the revision machinery. This opens up a large number of possibilities, only a small set of which are tested here.
For documentation, we avoid duplicating the option documentation and instead link to the documentation of 'git rev-list'.
Note that these arguments currently allow specifying a pathspec, which modifies the commit history checks but does not limit the paths used in the backfill logic. This will be updated in a future change.
--- Documentation/git-backfill.adoc | 3 + builtin/backfill.c | 19 ++-- t/t5620-backfill.sh | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-backfill.adoc +3 -0
@@ -63,9 +63,12 @@ OPTIONS current sparse-checkout. If the sparse-checkout feature is enabled, then `--sparse` is assumed and can be disabled with `--no-sparse`. +You may also specify the commit limiting options from linkgit:git-rev-list[1]. + SEE ALSO -------- linkgit:git-clone[1]. +linkgit:git-rev-list[1]. GIT ---
builtin/backfill.c +13 -6
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct backfill_context {struct oid_array current_batch;size_t min_batch_size;int sparse; +struct rev_info revs; };static void backfill_context_clear (struct backfill_context *ctx)
@@ -80,7 +81,6 @@ static int fill_missing_blobs(const char *path UNUSED,static int do_backfill (struct backfill_context *ctx) { -struct rev_info revs;struct path_walk_info info =PATH_WALK_INFO_INIT ;int ret;
@@ -92,13 +92,14 @@ static int do_backfill(struct backfill_context *ctx) } } -repo_init_revisions (ctx->repo, &revs,"" ); -handle_revision_arg ("HEAD" , &revs,0 ,0 ); +/* Walk from HEAD if otherwise unspecified. */ +if (!ctx->revs.pending.nr) +handle_revision_arg ("HEAD" , &ctx->revs,0 ,0 ); info.blobs =1 ; info.tags = info.commits = info.trees =0 ; - info.revs = &revs; + info.revs = &ctx->revs; info.path_fn = fill_missing_blobs; info.path_fn_data = ctx;
@@ -109,7 +110,6 @@ static int do_backfill(struct backfill_context *ctx)download_batch (ctx);path_walk_info_clear (&info); -release_revisions (&revs);return ret; }
@@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ int cmd_backfill(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, struct reposit .current_batch = OID_ARRAY_INIT, .min_batch_size = 50000, .sparse = 0, + .revs = REV_INFO_INIT, };struct option options[] = { OPT_UNSIGNED(0, "min-batch-size", &ctx.min_batch_size,
@@ -134,7 +135,12 @@ int cmd_backfill(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, struct reposit builtin_backfill_usage, options); argc =parse_options (argc, argv, prefix, options, builtin_backfill_usage, -0 ); +PARSE_OPT_KEEP_UNKNOWN_OPT | +PARSE_OPT_KEEP_ARGV0 | +PARSE_OPT_KEEP_DASHDASH ); + +repo_init_revisions (repo, &ctx.revs, prefix); + argc =setup_revisions (argc, argv, &ctx.revs,NULL );repo_config (repo, git_default_config,NULL );
@@ -143,5 +149,6 @@ int cmd_backfill(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, struct reposit result =do_backfill (&ctx);backfill_context_clear (&ctx); +release_revisions (&ctx.revs);return result; }
t/t5620-backfill.sh +156 -0
162 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
builtin/backfill.c static int do_backfill(struct backfill_context *ctx) · line 96
Quoted 2 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
builtin/backfill.c +0
-2-repo_init_revisions (ctx->repo, &revs,"" ); -handle_revision_arg ("HEAD" , &revs,0 ,0 );
So we used to "cheat" and did an initialization without even knowing in which directory we were started ...
builtin/backfill.c static int do_backfill(struct backfill_context *ctx) · line 97
Quoted 3 lines
builtin/backfill.c +3
-0+/* Walk from HEAD if otherwise unspecified. */ +if (!ctx->revs.pending.nr) +handle_revision_arg ("HEAD" , &ctx->revs,0 ,0 );
... but by initializing the revs correctly in the caller, we would be correcting it. Looking good.
builtin/backfill.c int cmd_backfill(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, struct reposit · line 143
Quoted 11 lines
builtin/backfill.c +6
-1@@ -134,7 +135,12 @@ int cmd_backfill(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, struct reposit builtin_backfill_usage, options); argc =parse_options (argc, argv, prefix, options, builtin_backfill_usage, -0 ); +PARSE_OPT_KEEP_UNKNOWN_OPT | +PARSE_OPT_KEEP_ARGV0 | +PARSE_OPT_KEEP_DASHDASH ); + +repo_init_revisions (repo, &ctx.revs, prefix); + argc =setup_revisions (argc, argv, &ctx.revs,NULL );
OK.
Quoted 6 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
[snip]
Documentation/git-backfill.adoc +0
-0
Documentation/git-backfill.adoc OPTIONS · line 71
Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/git-backfill.adoc +3
-0@@ -63,9 +63,12 @@ OPTIONS current sparse-checkout. If the sparse-checkout feature is enabled, then `--sparse` is assumed and can be disabled with `--no-sparse`. +You may also specify the commit limiting options from linkgit:git-rev-list[1]. + SEE ALSO -------- linkgit:git-clone[1]. +linkgit:git-rev-list[1].
Should there be a comma between these two?
Quoted 1 line
[snip]
Quoted 10 lines · Kristoffer Haugsbakk
Quoted 9 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
[snip]
Documentation/git-backfill.adoc +0
-0@@ -63,9 +63,12 @@ OPTIONS current sparse-checkout. If the sparse-checkout feature is enabled, then `--sparse` is assumed and can be disabled with `--no-sparse`.
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/git-backfill.adoc OPTIONS · line 71
Quoted 6 lines
Documentation/git-backfill.adoc +3
-0+You may also specify the commit limiting options from linkgit:git-rev-list[1]. + SEE ALSO -------- linkgit:git-clone[1]. +linkgit:git-rev-list[1].Should there be a comma between these two?
Good catch. Also there shouldn't be a hard stop, either.
Thanks,
-Stolee
Quoted 12 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The existing implementation of 'git backfill' only includes downloading missing blobs reachable from HEAD. Advanced uses may desire more general commit limiting options, such as '--all' for all references, specifying a commit range via negative references, or specifying a recency of use such as with '--since=<date>'.
All of these options are available if we use
setup_revisions()to parse the unknown arguments with the revision machinery. This opens up a large number of possibilities, only a small set of which are tested here.
Quoted 6 lines
For documentation, we avoid duplicating the option documentation and instead link to the documentation of 'git rev-list'.
Note that these arguments currently allow specifying a pathspec, which modifies the commit history checks but does not limit the paths used in the backfill logic. This will be updated in a future change.
Makes me wonder whether reversing the order would have avoided this slight awkwardness. But let's just stick with the current order, the end result would be the same anyway.
Quoted 12 lines
Signed-off-by Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>--- Documentation/git-backfill.adoc | 3 + builtin/backfill.c | 19 ++-- t/t5620-backfill.sh | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)builtin/backfill.c +0
-0
builtin/backfill.c static int do_backfill(struct backfill_context *ctx) · line 97
Quoted 8 lines
builtin/backfill.c +3
-2@@ -92,13 +92,14 @@ static int do_backfill(struct backfill_context *ctx) } } -repo_init_revisions (ctx->repo, &revs,"" ); -handle_revision_arg ("HEAD" , &revs,0 ,0 ); +/* Walk from HEAD if otherwise unspecified. */ +if (!ctx->revs.pending.nr) +handle_revision_arg ("HEAD" , &ctx->revs,0 ,0 );
Can we use add_head_to_pending(&ctx->revs) instead?
Patrick
Quoted 16 lines · Patrick Steinhardt
Quoted 15 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The existing implementation of 'git backfill' only includes downloading missing blobs reachable from HEAD. Advanced uses may desire more general commit limiting options, such as '--all' for all references, specifying a commit range via negative references, or specifying a recency of use such as with '--since=<date>'.
All of these options are available if we use
setup_revisions()to parse the unknown arguments with the revision machinery. This opens up a large number of possibilities, only a small set of which are tested here.For documentation, we avoid duplicating the option documentation and instead link to the documentation of 'git rev-list'.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Note that these arguments currently allow specifying a pathspec, which modifies the commit history checks but does not limit the paths used in the backfill logic. This will be updated in a future change.
Makes me wonder whether reversing the order would have avoided this slight awkwardness. But let's just stick with the current order, the end result would be the same anyway.
True, we could have added the pathspec logic first, but we wouldn't be able to test it right away because the parsing comes through the rev-list.
Quoted 15 lines
Quoted 15 lines
Signed-off-by Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>--- Documentation/git-backfill.adoc | 3 + builtin/backfill.c | 19 ++-- t/t5620-backfill.sh | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)builtin/backfill.c +0
-0@@ -92,13 +92,14 @@ static int do_backfill(struct backfill_context *ctx) } }
Quoted 7 lines
builtin/backfill.c static int do_backfill(struct backfill_context *ctx) · line 97
Quoted 5 lines
builtin/backfill.c +3
-2-repo_init_revisions (ctx->repo, &revs,"" ); -handle_revision_arg ("HEAD" , &revs,0 ,0 ); +/* Walk from HEAD if otherwise unspecified. */ +if (!ctx->revs.pending.nr) +handle_revision_arg ("HEAD" , &ctx->revs,0 ,0 );Can we use
add_head_to_pending(&ctx->revs)instead?
Nice. We absolutely can and should.
Thanks,
-Stolee
PATCH 4/5 backfill: work with prefix pathspecs
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The previous change allowed specifying revision arguments over the 'git backfill' command-line. This created the opportunity for pathspecs that specify a smaller set of starting commits, but otherwise did not restrict the blob paths that were downloaded.
Update the path-walk API to accept certain kinds of pathspecs and to silently ignore anything too complex. The current behavior focuses on pathspecs that match paths exactly. This includes exact filenames, including directory names as prefixes. Pathspecs containing wildcards or magic are cleared so the path walk downloads all blobs, as before.
The reason for this restriction is to allow for a faster execution by pruning the path walk to only trees that could contribute towards one of those paths as a parent directory.
The test directory 'd/f/' (next to 'd/file*.txt') was prepared in a previous commit to exercise the subtlety in prefix matching.
--- path-walk.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t5620-backfill.sh | 16 +++++-------- 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
path-walk.c +55 -0
@@ -206,6 +206,49 @@ static int add_tree_entries(struct path_walk_context *ctx, match != MATCHED)continue ; } +if (ctx->revs->prune_data.nr) { +struct pathspec *pd = &ctx->revs->prune_data; +bool found = false; + +for (int i =0 ; i < pd->nr; i++) { +struct pathspec_item *item = &pd->items[i]; + +/* +* Is this path a parent directory of +* the pathspec item? +*/ +if (path.len < (size_t )item->len && + !strncmp (path.buf, item->match, path.len) && + item->match[path.len -1 ] =='/' ) { + found = true; +break ; + } + +/* +* Or, is the pathspec an exact match? +*/ +if (path.len == (size_t )item->len && + !strcmp (path.buf, item->match)) { + found = true; +break ; + } + +/* +* Or, is the pathspec a directory prefix +* match? +*/ +if (path.len > (size_t )item->len && + !strncmp (path.buf, item->match, item->len) && + path.buf[item->len] =='/' ) { + found = true; +break ; + } + } + +/* Skip paths that do not match the prefix. */ +if (!found) +continue ; + }add_path_to_list (ctx, path.buf, type, &entry.oid, !(o->flags &UNINTERESTING ));
@@ -481,6 +524,18 @@ int walk_objects_by_path(struct path_walk_info *info)if (info->tags) info->revs->tag_objects =1 ; +if (ctx.revs->prune_data.nr) { +/* +* Only exact prefix pathspecs are currently supported. +* Clear any wildcard or magic pathspecs to avoid +* incorrect prefix matching. +*/ +struct pathspec *pd = &ctx.revs->prune_data; + +if (pd->has_wildcard || pd->magic) + pd->nr =0 ; + } +/* Insert a single list for the root tree into the paths. */ CALLOC_ARRAY (root_tree_list,1 ); root_tree_list->type =OBJ_TREE ;
t/t5620-backfill.sh +6 -10
@@ -273,13 +273,11 @@ test_expect_success 'backfill with prefix pathspec' ' git -C backfill-path rev-list --quiet --objects --missing=print HEAD >missing && test_line_count = 48 missing && - # TODO: The pathspec should limit the downloaded blobs to - # only those matching the prefix "d/f", but currently all - # blobs are downloaded. - git -C backfill-path backfill HEAD -- d/f && + git -C backfill-path backfill HEAD -- d/f 2>err && + test_must_be_empty err && git -C backfill-path rev-list --quiet --objects --missing=print HEAD >missing && - test_line_count = 0 missing + test_line_count = 40 missing ' test_expect_success 'backfill with multiple pathspecs' '
@@ -292,13 +290,11 @@ test_expect_success 'backfill with multiple pathspecs' ' git -C backfill-path rev-list --quiet --objects --missing=print HEAD >missing && test_line_count = 48 missing && - # TODO: The pathspecs should limit the downloaded blobs to - # only those matching "d/f" or "a", but currently all blobs - # are downloaded. - git -C backfill-path backfill HEAD -- d/f a && + git -C backfill-path backfill HEAD -- d/f a 2>err && + test_must_be_empty err && git -C backfill-path rev-list --quiet --objects --missing=print HEAD >missing && - test_line_count = 0 missing + test_line_count = 16 missing ' test_expect_success 'backfill with wildcard pathspec' '
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH 4/5] backfill: work with prefix pathspecs
Quoted 6 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The previous change allowed specifying revision arguments over the 'git backfill' command-line. This created the opportunity for pathspecs that specify a smaller set of starting commits, but otherwise did not restrict the blob paths that were downloaded.
"pathspecs that specify a smaller set of starting commits" is puzzling, as starting commits would be coming from the revision arguments. "opportunity for pathspec to further filter commits to those that touch only the matching paths...", or something?
Quoted 2 lines
Update the path-walk API to accept certain kinds of pathspecs and to silently ignore anything too complex.
Hmph, "silently ignore", instead of "no, you cannot use that! and die", or at least "sorry, I cannot do that, so the result may not be what you wanted, you've been warned"?
Quoted 4 lines
The current behavior focuses on
pathspecs that match paths exactly. This includes exact filenames, including directory names as prefixes. Pathspecs containing wildcards or magic are cleared so the path walk downloads all blobs, as before.
Ah, "we punt and lift the limitation to grab everything, so at least everything you wanted to have will become available to you, even though we may download more than what you asked"? OK, users would survive that, and as we improve the pathspec support, the user experience would only improve. OK.
Re: [PATCH 4/5] backfill: work with prefix pathspecs
Quoted 9 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 6 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The previous change allowed specifying revision arguments over the 'git backfill' command-line. This created the opportunity for pathspecs that specify a smaller set of starting commits, but otherwise did not restrict the blob paths that were downloaded.
Quoted 4 lines
"pathspecs that specify a smaller set of starting commits" is puzzling, as starting commits would be coming from the revision arguments. "opportunity for pathspec to further filter commits to those that touch only the matching paths...", or something?
You're right. I'm using "starting commits" incorrectly. My view was too focused on how the path-walk API starts from the commits output by the revision walk to get a list of root trees and then walks by path from that point.
I'll reword to make this more clear.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Update the path-walk API to accept certain kinds of pathspecs and to silently ignore anything too complex.
Hmph, "silently ignore", instead of "no, you cannot use that! and die", or at least "sorry, I cannot do that, so the result may not be what you wanted, you've been warned"?
The behavior when silently ignoring is to over-download. The revision walk still filters commits, but the path-walk then walks paths beyond that pathspec. This will be fixed in the next commit, so adding an error case didn't seem worth it. I'll do a better job foreshadowing.
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 4 lines
The current behavior focuses on
pathspecs that match paths exactly. This includes exact filenames, including directory names as prefixes. Pathspecs containing wildcards or magic are cleared so the path walk downloads all blobs, as before.Ah, "we punt and lift the limitation to grab everything, so at least everything you wanted to have will become available to you, even though we may download more than what you asked"? OK, users would survive that, and as we improve the pathspec support, the user experience would only improve. OK.
Exactly. I can word things better.
Thanks,
-Stolee
Re: [PATCH 4/5] backfill: work with prefix pathspecs
Quoted 4 lines · Derrick Stolee
Quoted 3 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 2 lines
Update the path-walk API to accept certain kinds of pathspecs and to silently ignore anything too complex.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Hmph, "silently ignore", instead of "no, you cannot use that! and die", or at least "sorry, I cannot do that, so the result may not be what you wanted, you've been warned"?
The behavior when silently ignoring is to over-download. The revision walk still filters commits, but the path-walk then walks paths beyond that pathspec. This will be fixed in the next commit, so adding an error case didn't seem worth it. I'll do a better job foreshadowing.
I guess this is a fine tradeoff when documented properly. But I think in that case we should make very clear that this behaviour may change in the future if find a way to efficiently limit the pathwalk, too.
Patrick
Re: [PATCH 4/5] backfill: work with prefix pathspecs
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetQuoted 9 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
path-walk.c +1
-0@@ -481,6 +524,18 @@ int walk_objects_by_path(struct path_walk_info *info)if (info->tags) info->revs->tag_objects =1 ; +if (ctx.revs->prune_data.nr) {
path-walk.c int walk_objects_by_path(struct path_walk_info *info) · line 537
Quoted 10 lines
path-walk.c +10
-0+/* +* Only exact prefix pathspecs are currently supported. +* Clear any wildcard or magic pathspecs to avoid +* incorrect prefix matching. +*/ +struct pathspec *pd = &ctx.revs->prune_data; + +if (pd->has_wildcard || pd->magic) + pd->nr =0 ; + }
Huh, curious. Won't this cause a leak? I guess we should rather use clear_pathspec() here.
Also shows that this path is missing test coverage.
Patrick
Re: [PATCH 4/5] backfill: work with prefix pathspecs
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetQuoted 35 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
path-walk.c +27
-0@@ -206,6 +206,49 @@ static int add_tree_entries(struct path_walk_context *ctx, match != MATCHED)continue ; } +if (ctx->revs->prune_data.nr) { +struct pathspec *pd = &ctx->revs->prune_data; +bool found = false; + +for (int i =0 ; i < pd->nr; i++) { +struct pathspec_item *item = &pd->items[i]; + +/* +* Is this path a parent directory of +* the pathspec item? +*/ +if (path.len < (size_t )item->len && + !strncmp (path.buf, item->match, path.len) && + item->match[path.len -1 ] =='/' ) { + found = true; +break ; + } + +/* +* Or, is the pathspec an exact match? +*/ +if (path.len == (size_t )item->len && + !strcmp (path.buf, item->match)) { + found = true; +break ; + } +
path-walk.c static int add_tree_entries(struct path_walk_context *ctx, · line 245
Quoted 10 lines
path-walk.c +10
-0+/* +* Or, is the pathspec a directory prefix +* match? +*/ +if (path.len > (size_t )item->len && + !strncmp (path.buf, item->match, item->len) && + path.buf[item->len] =='/' ) { + found = true; +break ; + }
Ah, one more thing: we could expose dir_prefix() from "path.c" and reuse it here.
Patrick
Re: [PATCH 4/5] backfill: work with prefix pathspecs
Quoted 2 lines · Patrick Steinhardt
Ah, one more thing: we could expose
dir_prefix()from "path.c" and reuse it here.
Good idea. This becomes
/*
* Continue if either is a directory prefix
* of the other.
*/
if (dir_prefix(path.buf, item->match) ||
dir_prefix(item->match, path.buf)) {
found = true;
break;
}With the idea that we need to walk the parents of each prefix in addition to walking all of their children.
Thanks,
-Stolee
PATCH 5/5 path-walk: support wildcard pathspecs for blob filtering
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Previously, walk_objects_by_path() silently ignored pathspecs containing wildcards or magic by clearing them. This caused all blobs to be downloaded regardless of the given pathspec. Wildcard pathspecs like "d/file.*.txt" are useful for narrowing which blobs to process (e.g., during 'git backfill').
Support wildcard pathspecs by making three changes:
1. Add an 'exact_pathspecs' flag to path_walk_context. When the pathspec has no wildcards or magic, set this flag and use the existing fast-path prefix matching in add_tree_entries(). When wildcards are present, skip that block since prefix matching cannot handle glob patterns.
2. Disable revision-level commit pruning (revs->prune = 0) for wildcard pathspecs. The revision walk uses the pathspec to filter commits via TREESAME detection. For exact prefix pathspecs this works well, but wildcard pathspecs may fail to match through TREESAME because fnmatch with WM_PATHNAME does not cross directory boundaries. Disabling pruning ensures all commits are visited and their trees are available for the path-walk to filter.
3. Add a match_pathspec() check in walk_path() to filter out blobs whose full path does not match the pathspec. This provides the actual blob-level filtering for wildcard pathspecs.
--- path-walk.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- t/t5620-backfill.sh | 7 +++---- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
path-walk.c +14 -8
@@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ struct path_walk_context {*/ struct prio_queue path_stack;struct strset path_stack_pushed; + + unsigned exact_pathspecs:1; };static int compare_by_type (const void *one,const void *two,void *cb_data)
@@ -206,7 +208,7 @@ static int add_tree_entries(struct path_walk_context *ctx, match != MATCHED)continue ; } -if (ctx->revs->prune_data.nr) { +if (ctx->revs->prune_data.nr && ctx->exact_pathspecs) {struct pathspec *pd = &ctx->revs->prune_data;bool found = false;
@@ -317,6 +319,13 @@ static int walk_path(struct path_walk_context *ctx,return 0 ; } +if (list->type ==OBJ_BLOB && + ctx->revs->prune_data.nr && + !match_pathspec (ctx->repo->index, &ctx->revs->prune_data, + path,strlen (path),0 , +NULL ,0 )) +return 0 ; +/* Evaluate function pointer on this data, if requested. */ if ((list->type == OBJ_TREE && ctx->info->trees) || (list->type == OBJ_BLOB && ctx->info->blobs) ||
@@ -525,15 +534,12 @@ int walk_objects_by_path(struct path_walk_info *info) info->revs->tag_objects =1 ;if (ctx.revs->prune_data.nr) { -/* -* Only exact prefix pathspecs are currently supported. -* Clear any wildcard or magic pathspecs to avoid -* incorrect prefix matching. -*/ struct pathspec *pd = &ctx.revs->prune_data; -if (pd->has_wildcard || pd->magic) - pd->nr =0 ; +if (!pd->has_wildcard && !pd->magic) + ctx.exact_pathspecs =1 ; +else + ctx.revs->prune =0 ; }/* Insert a single list for the root tree into the paths. */
t/t5620-backfill.sh +3 -4
@@ -307,12 +307,11 @@ test_expect_success 'backfill with wildcard pathspec' ' git -C backfill-path rev-list --quiet --objects --missing=print HEAD >missing && test_line_count = 48 missing && - # TODO: The wildcard pathspec should limit downloaded blobs, - # but currently all blobs are downloaded. - git -C backfill-path backfill HEAD -- "d/file.*.txt" && + git -C backfill-path backfill HEAD -- "d/file.*.txt" 2>err && + test_must_be_empty err && git -C backfill-path rev-list --quiet --objects --missing=print HEAD >missing && - test_line_count = 0 missing + test_line_count = 40 missing ' test_expect_success 'backfill with --all' '
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH 5/5] path-walk: support wildcard pathspecs for blob filtering
Quoted 16 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Previously,
walk_objects_by_path()silently ignored pathspecs containing wildcards or magic by clearing them. This caused all blobs to be downloaded regardless of the given pathspec. Wildcard pathspecs like "d/file.*.txt" are useful for narrowing which blobs to process (e.g., during 'git backfill').Support wildcard pathspecs by making three changes:
1. Add an '
exact_pathspecs' flag topath_walk_context. When the pathspec has no wildcards or magic, set this flag and use the existing fast-path prefix matching inadd_tree_entries(). When wildcards are present, skip that block since prefix matching cannot handle glob patterns.
Quoted 7 lines
2. Disable revision-level commit pruning (
revs->prune= 0) for wildcard pathspecs. The revision walk uses the pathspec to filter commits via TREESAME detection. For exact prefix pathspecs this works well, but wildcard pathspecs may fail to match through TREESAME because fnmatch withWM_PATHNAMEdoes not cross directory boundaries. Disabling pruning ensures all commits are visited and their trees are available for the path-walk to filter.
Hmph, I wonder how significant an impact does it have on the performance that we have to disable pruning here. With the bog standard tree traversal, wouldn't tree_entry_interesting() already be capable of doing this, even with fnmatch / WM_PATHNAME ?
Quoted 6 lines
3. Add a
match_pathspec()check inwalk_path()to filter out blobs whose full path does not match the pathspec. This provides the actual blob-level filtering for wildcard pathspecs.Signed-off-by Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>Co-authored-by Copilot <[email protected]>
The latter person cannot sign DCO or vouch for the origin of what they have written in this patch, can they?
Quoted 4 lines
--- path-walk.c | 22 ++++++++++++++-------- t/t5620-backfill.sh | 7 +++---- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Re: [PATCH 5/5] path-walk: support wildcard pathspecs for blob filtering
Quoted 26 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 16 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Previously,
walk_objects_by_path()silently ignored pathspecs containing wildcards or magic by clearing them. This caused all blobs to be downloaded regardless of the given pathspec. Wildcard pathspecs like "d/file.*.txt" are useful for narrowing which blobs to process (e.g., during 'git backfill').Support wildcard pathspecs by making three changes:
1. Add an '
exact_pathspecs' flag topath_walk_context. When the pathspec has no wildcards or magic, set this flag and use the existing fast-path prefix matching inadd_tree_entries(). When wildcards are present, skip that block since prefix matching cannot handle glob patterns.Quoted 7 lines
2. Disable revision-level commit pruning (
revs->prune= 0) for wildcard pathspecs. The revision walk uses the pathspec to filter commits via TREESAME detection. For exact prefix pathspecs this works well, but wildcard pathspecs may fail to match through TREESAME because fnmatch withWM_PATHNAMEdoes not cross directory boundaries. Disabling pruning ensures all commits are visited and their trees are available for the path-walk to filter.
Quoted 4 lines
Hmph, I wonder how significant an impact does it have on the performance that we have to disable pruning here. With the bog standard tree traversal, wouldn't
tree_entry_interesting()already be capable of doing this, even with fnmatch /WM_PATHNAME?
I will explore what's possible here and see what I can do.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 6 lines
3. Add a
match_pathspec()check inwalk_path()to filter out blobs whose full path does not match the pathspec. This provides the actual blob-level filtering for wildcard pathspecs.Signed-off-by Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>Co-authored-by Copilot <[email protected]>The latter person cannot sign DCO or vouch for the origin of what they have written in this patch, can they?
No they cannot. Sorry for this error.
Thanks,
-Stolee
Re: [PATCH 5/5] path-walk: support wildcard pathspecs for blob filtering
Quoted 27 lines · Derrick Stolee
Quoted 26 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 23 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Previously,
walk_objects_by_path()silently ignored pathspecs containing wildcards or magic by clearing them. This caused all blobs to be downloaded regardless of the given pathspec. Wildcard pathspecs like "d/file.*.txt" are useful for narrowing which blobs to process (e.g., during 'git backfill').Support wildcard pathspecs by making three changes:
1. Add an '
exact_pathspecs' flag topath_walk_context. When the pathspec has no wildcards or magic, set this flag and use the existing fast-path prefix matching inadd_tree_entries(). When wildcards are present, skip that block since prefix matching cannot handle glob patterns.2. Disable revision-level commit pruning (
revs->prune= 0) for wildcard pathspecs. The revision walk uses the pathspec to filter commits via TREESAME detection. For exact prefix pathspecs this works well, but wildcard pathspecs may fail to match through TREESAME because fnmatch withWM_PATHNAMEdoes not cross directory boundaries. Disabling pruning ensures all commits are visited and their trees are available for the path-walk to filter.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Hmph, I wonder how significant an impact does it have on the performance that we have to disable pruning here. With the bog standard tree traversal, wouldn't
tree_entry_interesting()already be capable of doing this, even with fnmatch /WM_PATHNAME?I will explore what's possible here and see what I can do.
I must have needed the 'revs->prune = 0' at some point during development and left it even though it isn't actually necessary. Leaving it implicitly at '1' should indeed be faster due to traversing fewer commits and parsing fewer trees while still reaching all necessary blobs.
Only changes 1 and 3 are necessary.
Thanks,
-Stolee
Quoted 9 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
The git backfill command assists in downloading missing blobs for blobless partial clones. However, its current version lacks some valuable functionality. It currently:
1. Only walks commits reachable from HEAD.
2. It walks all reachable commits to the full history.
3. It can focus on the current sparse-checkout definition, but otherwise it doesn't focus on a given pathspec.
Quoted 4 lines
All of these are being updated by this patch series, which allows rev-list options to impact the path-walk. These include:
1. Specifying a given refspec, including --all.
Makes sense. You can only be on a single branch at a time, but may want to work on multiple topics in reasonably quick succession in a single repository. Being able to prepare enough material to go back to when working on whichever topic in a single backfill invocation would be a welcome addition.
Quoted 3 lines
2. Modifying the commit walk, including --first-parent, commit ranges, or
recency using --since.3. Modifying the set of paths to download using pathspecs.
Both are good mechanisms to express which subset of history you will be working on.
Quoted 6 lines
One particularly valuable situation here is that now a user can run git backfill -- <path> to download all versions of a specific file or a specific directory, accelerating history queries within that path without downloading more than necessary. This can accelerate git blame or git log -L for these paths, where normally those commands download missing blobs one-by-one during its diff algorithms.
Yup. Even if your project is a huge monorepo that contains all, you do not necessarily have to look at everything the organization has all the time. "git blame -C -C -C" would of course not work in such an environment (would it end up on-demand lazy fetch these blobs, or are there ways to say "I know the object store of my repository is only sparsely populated, and I do not want you to on-demand download the missing blobs---do your best to work with only what is already available?), but that's a tradeoff a monorepo makes.
Quoted 15 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
The git backfill command assists in downloading missing blobs for blobless partial clones. However, its current version lacks some valuable functionality. It currently:
1. Only walks commits reachable from HEAD.
2. It walks all reachable commits to the full history.
3. It can focus on the current sparse-checkout definition, but otherwise it doesn't focus on a given pathspec.All of these are being updated by this patch series, which allows rev-list options to impact the path-walk. These include:
1. Specifying a given refspec, including --all.
2. Modifying the commit walk, including --first-parent, commit ranges, orrecency using --since.
Quoted 8 lines
3. Modifying the set of paths to download using pathspecs.
One particularly valuable situation here is that now a user can run git backfill -- <path> to download all versions of a specific file or a specific directory, accelerating history queries within that path without downloading more than necessary. This can accelerate git blame or git log -L for these paths, where normally those commands download missing blobs one-by-one during its diff algorithms.
Nice.
I think especially blaming is a bit of a sore spot -- downloading blobs one by one simply doesn't cut it there. I wonder whether we can easily use the backfill mechanism to fetch blobs automatically in git-blame(1) so that the user doesn't need to know about git-backfill(1) at all?
Patrick
Quoted 4 lines · Patrick Steinhardt
I think especially blaming is a bit of a sore spot -- downloading blobs one by one simply doesn't cut it there. I wonder whether we can easily use the backfill mechanism to fetch blobs automatically in git-blame(1) so that the user doesn't need to know about git-backfill(1) at all?
I've thought about this a bit, and I'm not sure that we want to run 'git backfill' directly. Instead, it would be nice if we did a "staged" algorithm for 'git blame':
1. Walk commits according to the pathspec to collect the commits that changed the path.
2. Collect the list of blob OIDs that will be needed for computing diffs for the line-tracking algorithm.
3. In batches, download groups of missing blobs and then process them for line-tracking diffs. (Stop if all lines are blamed; continue to next batch if more lines are needed.)
This would be a significant rewrite of the blame algorithm, though. I briefly considered this approach about a year ago and decided it would be easier to start with 'git backfill' and see whether that satisfies most needs.
The biggest reason to maybe avoid 'git backfill HEAD -- <path>' before _every_ blame operation is that this will add overhead on repeated calls that may be obnoxious in its own way. Maybe doing an opt-in 'git blame --backfill <path>' would make it easier for users to opt-in when they want to.
Thanks,
-Stolee
Quoted 25 lines · Derrick Stolee
Quoted 4 lines · Patrick Steinhardt
I think especially blaming is a bit of a sore spot -- downloading blobs one by one simply doesn't cut it there. I wonder whether we can easily use the backfill mechanism to fetch blobs automatically in git-blame(1) so that the user doesn't need to know about git-backfill(1) at all?
I've thought about this a bit, and I'm not sure that we want to run 'git backfill' directly. Instead, it would be nice if we did a "staged" algorithm for 'git blame':
1. Walk commits according to the pathspec to collect the commits that changed the path.
2. Collect the list of blob OIDs that will be needed for computing diffs for the line-tracking algorithm.
3. In batches, download groups of missing blobs and then process them for line-tracking diffs. (Stop if all lines are blamed; continue to next batch if more lines are needed.)
This would be a significant rewrite of the blame algorithm, though. I briefly considered this approach about a year ago and decided it would be easier to start with 'git backfill' and see whether that satisfies most needs.
Quoted 5 lines
The biggest reason to maybe avoid 'git backfill HEAD -- <path>' before _every_ blame operation is that this will add overhead on repeated calls that may be obnoxious in its own way. Maybe doing an opt-in 'git blame --backfill <path>' would make it easier for users to opt-in when they want to.
That's fair. I fully agree that just blindly doing this would be likely be inefficient. Ideally, the batching logic would only kick in whenever we see a missing object.
Anyway, this definitely doesn't have to be part of this series, I was mostly wondering how hard it is to do.
Thanks!
Patrick
v2 cover backfill: accept revision arguments
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetThe git backfill command assists in downloading missing blobs for blobless partial clones. However, its current version lacks some valuable functionality. It currently:
1. Only walks commits reachable from HEAD.
2. It walks all reachable commits to the full history.
3. It can focus on the current sparse-checkout definition, but otherwise it doesn't focus on a given pathspec.
All of these are being updated by this patch series, which allows rev-list options to impact the path-walk. These include:
1. Specifying a given refspec, including --all.
2. Modifying the commit walk, including --first-parent, commit ranges, or
recency using --since.
3. Modifying the set of paths to download using pathspecs.
One particularly valuable situation here is that now a user can run git backfill -- <path> to download all versions of a specific file or a specific directory, accelerating history queries within that path without downloading more than necessary. This can accelerate git blame or git log -L for these paths, where normally those commands download missing blobs one-by-one during its diff algorithms.
This patch series is organized in the following way:
1. A missing #include is added to prevent future compilation issues.
2. The test repo in t5620 is expanded to make later tests more interesting.
3. The backfill builtin parses the rev-list arguments. We test the top arguments that work as expected, though the pathspec arguments need extra work.
4. Update the path-walk logic to work efficiently with some pathspecs, such as fixed prefix pathspecs, accelerating the computation.
5. For more complicated pathspecs, do a post-filter in builtin/backfill.c instead of restricting the walk in the path-walk API.
The main goal of this series is to make such customizations possible, and to improve performance where common use cases are expected. I'm open to feedback as to whether we should consider more detailed performance analysis or whether we should wait for how users interact with these new options before overoptimizing unlikely use cases.
Updates in v2
=============
* Hard stops are replaced with a comma (and no punctuation) in the docs.
* add_head_to_pending() simplifies some code.
* My poor explanation of "starting commits" is updated.
* Language around temporary prefix restriction is clarified.
* Prefix match logic is simplified with dir_prefix().
* Temporary memory leak (introduced in v1's patch 4 and removed in v1's patch 5) is removed in v2's patch 4.
* Commit pruning is reenabled in v2's patch 5. There was no need for that with the way the logic works in the patch.
* Add a new patch with a test demonstrating the new behavior that was being discussed in [1].
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
Thanks, -Stolee
Derrick Stolee (6):
revision: include object-name.h
t5620: prepare branched repo for revision tests
backfill: accept revision arguments
backfill: work with prefix pathspecs
path-walk: support wildcard pathspecs for blob filtering
t5620: test backfill's unknown argument handling
Documentation/git-backfill.adoc | 5 +- builtin/backfill.c | 19 ++- path-walk.c | 44 +++++++ path.c | 2 +- path.h | 6 + revision.h | 1 + t/t5620-backfill.sh | 211 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 7 files changed, 278 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
base-commit: 67ad42147a7acc2af6074753ebd03d904476118f
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-2070%2Fderrickstolee%2Fbackfill-revs-v2
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-2070/derrickstolee/backfill-revs-v2
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/2070
Range-diff vs v1:
1: fda0239103 = 1: fda0239103 revision: include object-name.h
2: 55a45b2fc8 = 2: 55a45b2fc8 t5620: prepare branched repo for revision tests
3: dc6652c84c ! 3: 610a162973 backfill: accept revision arguments
@@ Documentation/git-backfill.adoc: OPTIONS
+
SEE ALSO
--------
- linkgit:git-clone[1].
-+linkgit:git-rev-list[1].
+-linkgit:git-clone[1].
++linkgit:git-clone[1],
++linkgit:git-rev-list[1]
GIT
---
@@ builtin/backfill.c: static int do_backfill(struct backfill_context *ctx)
- handle_revision_arg("HEAD", &revs, 0, 0);
+ /* Walk from HEAD if otherwise unspecified. */
+ if (!ctx->revs.pending.nr)
-+ handle_revision_arg("HEAD", &ctx->revs, 0, 0);
++ add_head_to_pending(&ctx->revs);
info.blobs = 1;
info.tags = info.commits = info.trees = 0;
4: 977f62faa5 ! 4: f8f2c61326 backfill: work with prefix pathspecs
@@ Commit message
backfill: work with prefix pathspecs
The previous change allowed specifying revision arguments over the 'git
- backfill' command-line. This created the opportunity for pathspecs that
- specify a smaller set of starting commits, but otherwise did not restrict
- the blob paths that were downloaded.
+ backfill' command-line. This created the opportunity for restricting the
+ initial commit set by filtering the revision walk through a pathspec. Other
+ than filtering the commit set (and thereby the root trees), this did not
+ restrict the path-walk implementation of 'git backfill' and did not restrict
+ the blobs that were downloaded to only those matching the pathspec.
Update the path-walk API to accept certain kinds of pathspecs and to
- silently ignore anything too complex. The current behavior focuses on
- pathspecs that match paths exactly. This includes exact filenames,
- including directory names as prefixes. Pathspecs containing wildcards
- or magic are cleared so the path walk downloads all blobs, as before.
+ silently ignore anything too complex, for now. We will update this in the
+ next change to properly restrict to even complex pathspecs.
+
+ The current behavior focuses on pathspecs that match paths exactly. This
+ includes exact filenames, including directory names as prefixes. Pathspecs
+ containing wildcards or magic are cleared so the path walk downloads all
+ blobs, as before.
The reason for this restriction is to allow for a faster execution by
pruning the path walk to only trees that could contribute towards one of
@@ Commit message
Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
## path-walk.c ##
+@@
+ #include "list-objects.h"
+ #include "object.h"
+ #include "oid-array.h"
++#include "path.h"
+ #include "prio-queue.h"
+ #include "repository.h"
+ #include "revision.h"
@@ path-walk.c: static int add_tree_entries(struct path_walk_context *ctx,
match != MATCHED)
continue;
@@ path-walk.c: static int add_tree_entries(struct path_walk_context *ctx,
+ struct pathspec *pd = &ctx->revs->prune_data;
+ bool found = false;
+
++ /* remove '/' for these checks. */
++ path.buf[path.len - 1] = 0;
++
+ for (int i = 0; i < pd->nr; i++) {
+ struct pathspec_item *item = &pd->items[i];
+
+ /*
-+ * Is this path a parent directory of
-+ * the pathspec item?
-+ */
-+ if (path.len < (size_t)item->len &&
-+ !strncmp(path.buf, item->match, path.len) &&
-+ item->match[path.len - 1] == '/') {
-+ found = true;
-+ break;
-+ }
-+
-+ /*
-+ * Or, is the pathspec an exact match?
-+ */
-+ if (path.len == (size_t)item->len &&
-+ !strcmp(path.buf, item->match)) {
-+ found = true;
-+ break;
-+ }
-+
-+ /*
-+ * Or, is the pathspec a directory prefix
-+ * match?
++ * Continue if either is a directory prefix
++ * of the other.
+ */
-+ if (path.len > (size_t)item->len &&
-+ !strncmp(path.buf, item->match, item->len) &&
-+ path.buf[item->len] == '/') {
++ if (dir_prefix(path.buf, item->match) ||
++ dir_prefix(item->match, path.buf)) {
+ found = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
++ /* return '/' after these checks. */
++ path.buf[path.len - 1] = '/';
++
+ /* Skip paths that do not match the prefix. */
+ if (!found)
+ continue;
@@ path-walk.c: int walk_objects_by_path(struct path_walk_info *info)
+ * Clear any wildcard or magic pathspecs to avoid
+ * incorrect prefix matching.
+ */
-+ struct pathspec *pd = &ctx.revs->prune_data;
-+
-+ if (pd->has_wildcard || pd->magic)
-+ pd->nr = 0;
++ if (ctx.revs->prune_data.has_wildcard ||
++ ctx.revs->prune_data.magic)
++ clear_pathspec(&ctx.revs->prune_data);
+ }
+
/* Insert a single list for the root tree into the paths. */
CALLOC_ARRAY(root_tree_list, 1);
root_tree_list->type = OBJ_TREE;
+ ## path.c ##
+@@ path.c: static void strbuf_cleanup_path(struct strbuf *sb)
+ strbuf_remove(sb, 0, path - sb->buf);
+ }
+
+-static int dir_prefix(const char *buf, const char *dir)
++int dir_prefix(const char *buf, const char *dir)
+ {
+ int len = strlen(dir);
+ return !strncmp(buf, dir, len) &&
+
+ ## path.h ##
+@@ path.h: const char *repo_submodule_path_replace(struct repository *repo,
+ const char *fmt, ...)
+ __attribute__((format (printf, 4, 5)));
+
++/*
++ * Given a directory name 'dir' (not ending with a trailing '/'),
++ * determine if 'buf' is equal to 'dir' or has prefix 'dir'+'/'.
++ */
++int dir_prefix(const char *buf, const char *dir);
++
+ void report_linked_checkout_garbage(struct repository *r);
+
+ /*
+
## t/t5620-backfill.sh ##
@@ t/t5620-backfill.sh: test_expect_success 'backfill with prefix pathspec' '
git -C backfill-path rev-list --quiet --objects --missing=print HEAD >missing && 5: beb1c92554 ! 5: 1168edfb96 path-walk: support wildcard pathspecs for blob filtering
@@ Commit message
"d/file.*.txt" are useful for narrowing which blobs to process (e.g., during 'git backfill').
- Support wildcard pathspecs by making three changes:
+ Support wildcard pathspecs by making two changes:
1. Add an 'exact_pathspecs' flag to path_walk_context. When the pathspec has no wildcards or magic, set this flag and use the
@@ Commit message
wildcards are present, skip that block since prefix matching cannot handle glob patterns.
- 2. Disable revision-level commit pruning (revs->prune = 0) for
- wildcard pathspecs. The revision walk uses the pathspec to filter
- commits via TREESAME detection. For exact prefix pathspecs this
- works well, but wildcard pathspecs may fail to match through
- TREESAME because fnmatch with WM_PATHNAME does not cross directory
- boundaries. Disabling pruning ensures all commits are visited and
- their trees are available for the path-walk to filter.
-
- 3. Add a match_pathspec() check in walk_path() to filter out blobs
+ 2. Add a match_pathspec() check in walk_path() to filter out blobs
whose full path does not match the pathspec. This provides the actual blob-level filtering for wildcard pathspecs.
- Co-authored-by: Copilot <[email protected]>
## path-walk.c ##
@@ path-walk.c: struct path_walk_context {
@@ path-walk.c: int walk_objects_by_path(struct path_walk_info *info)
- * Clear any wildcard or magic pathspecs to avoid
- * incorrect prefix matching.
- */
- struct pathspec *pd = &ctx.revs->prune_data;
-
-- if (pd->has_wildcard || pd->magic)
-- pd->nr = 0;
-+ if (!pd->has_wildcard && !pd->magic)
+- if (ctx.revs->prune_data.has_wildcard ||
+- ctx.revs->prune_data.magic)
+- clear_pathspec(&ctx.revs->prune_data);
++ if (!ctx.revs->prune_data.has_wildcard &&
++ !ctx.revs->prune_data.magic)
+ ctx.exact_pathspecs = 1;
-+ else
-+ ctx.revs->prune = 0;
}
/* Insert a single list for the root tree into the paths. */
-: ---------- > 6: 9699650aa7 t5620: test backfill's unknown argument handling
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v2 1/6 revision: include object-name.h
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The REV_INFO_INIT macro includes a use of the DEFAULT_ABBREV macro, which is defined in object-name.h. Include it in revision.h so consumers of REV_INFO_INIT do not need to include this hidden dependency.
--- revision.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
revision.h +1 -0
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@#include "commit.h" #include "grep.h" #include "notes.h" +#include "object-name.h" #include "oidset.h" #include "pretty.h" #include "diff.h"
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v2 2/6 t5620: prepare branched repo for revision tests
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Prepare the test infrastructure for upcoming changes that teach 'git backfill' to accept revision arguments and pathspecs.
Add test_tick before each commit in the setup loop so that commit dates are deterministic. This enables reliable testing with '--since'.
Rename the 'd/e/' directory to 'd/f/' so that the prefix 'd/f' is ambiguous with the files 'd/file.*.txt'. This exercises the subtlety in prefix pathspec matching that will be added in a later commit.
Create a branched version of the test repository (src-revs) with:
- A 'side' branch merged into main, adding s/file.{1,2}.txt with two versions (4 new blobs, 52 total from main HEAD).
- An unmerged 'other' branch adding o/file.{1,2}.txt (2 more blobs, 54 total reachable from --all).
This structure makes --all, --first-parent, and --since produce meaningfully different results when used with 'git backfill'.
--- t/t5620-backfill.sh | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
t/t5620-backfill.sh +50 -2
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup repo for object creation' ' git init src && mkdir -p src/a/b/c && - mkdir -p src/d/e && + mkdir -p src/d/f && for i in 1 2 do
@@ -26,8 +26,9 @@ test_expect_success 'setup repo for object creation' ' echo "Version $i of file a/b/$n" > src/a/b/file.$n.txt && echo "Version $i of file a/b/c/$n" > src/a/b/c/file.$n.txt && echo "Version $i of file d/$n" > src/d/file.$n.txt && - echo "Version $i of file d/e/$n" > src/d/e/file.$n.txt && + echo "Version $i of file d/f/$n" > src/d/f/file.$n.txt && git -C src add . && + test_tick && git -C src commit -m "Iteration $n" || return 1 done done
@@ -41,6 +42,53 @@ test_expect_success 'setup bare clone for server' ' git -C srv.bare config --local uploadpack.allowanysha1inwant 1 ' +# Create a version of the repo with branches for testing revision +# arguments like --all, --first-parent, and --since. +# +# main: 8 commits (linear) + merge of side branch +# 48 original blobs + 4 side blobs = 52 blobs from main HEAD +# side: 2 commits adding s/file.{1,2}.txt (v1, v2), merged into main +# other: 1 commit adding o/file.{1,2}.txt (not merged) +# 54 total blobs reachable from --all +test_expect_success 'setup branched repo for revision tests' ' + git clone src src-revs && + + # Side branch from tip of main with unique files + git -C src-revs checkout -b side HEAD && + mkdir -p src-revs/s && + echo "Side version 1 of file 1" >src-revs/s/file.1.txt && + echo "Side version 1 of file 2" >src-revs/s/file.2.txt && + test_tick && + git -C src-revs add . && + git -C src-revs commit -m "Side commit 1" && + + echo "Side version 2 of file 1" >src-revs/s/file.1.txt && + echo "Side version 2 of file 2" >src-revs/s/file.2.txt && + test_tick && + git -C src-revs add . && + git -C src-revs commit -m "Side commit 2" && + + # Merge side into main + git -C src-revs checkout main && + test_tick && + git -C src-revs merge side --no-ff -m "Merge side branch" && + + # Other branch (not merged) for --all testing + git -C src-revs checkout -b other main~1 && + mkdir -p src-revs/o && + echo "Other content 1" >src-revs/o/file.1.txt && + echo "Other content 2" >src-revs/o/file.2.txt && + test_tick && + git -C src-revs add . && + git -C src-revs commit -m "Other commit" && + + git -C src-revs checkout main && + + git clone --bare "file://$(pwd)/src-revs" srv-revs.bare && + git -C srv-revs.bare config --local uploadpack.allowfilter 1 && + git -C srv-revs.bare config --local uploadpack.allowanysha1inwant 1 +' + # do basic partial clone from "srv.bare" test_expect_success 'do partial clone 1, backfill gets all objects' ' git clone --no-checkout --filter=blob:none \
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v2 3/6 backfill: accept revision arguments
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The existing implementation of 'git backfill' only includes downloading missing blobs reachable from HEAD. Advanced uses may desire more general commit limiting options, such as '--all' for all references, specifying a commit range via negative references, or specifying a recency of use such as with '--since=<date>'.
All of these options are available if we use setup_revisions() to parse the unknown arguments with the revision machinery. This opens up a large number of possibilities, only a small set of which are tested here.
For documentation, we avoid duplicating the option documentation and instead link to the documentation of 'git rev-list'.
Note that these arguments currently allow specifying a pathspec, which modifies the commit history checks but does not limit the paths used in the backfill logic. This will be updated in a future change.
--- Documentation/git-backfill.adoc | 5 +- builtin/backfill.c | 19 ++-- t/t5620-backfill.sh | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-backfill.adoc +4 -1
@@ -63,9 +63,12 @@ OPTIONS current sparse-checkout. If the sparse-checkout feature is enabled, then `--sparse` is assumed and can be disabled with `--no-sparse`. +You may also specify the commit limiting options from linkgit:git-rev-list[1]. + SEE ALSO -------- -linkgit:git-clone[1]. +linkgit:git-clone[1], +linkgit:git-rev-list[1] GIT ---
builtin/backfill.c +13 -6
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct backfill_context {struct oid_array current_batch;size_t min_batch_size;int sparse; +struct rev_info revs; };static void backfill_context_clear (struct backfill_context *ctx)
@@ -80,7 +81,6 @@ static int fill_missing_blobs(const char *path UNUSED,static int do_backfill (struct backfill_context *ctx) { -struct rev_info revs;struct path_walk_info info =PATH_WALK_INFO_INIT ;int ret;
@@ -92,13 +92,14 @@ static int do_backfill(struct backfill_context *ctx) } } -repo_init_revisions (ctx->repo, &revs,"" ); -handle_revision_arg ("HEAD" , &revs,0 ,0 ); +/* Walk from HEAD if otherwise unspecified. */ +if (!ctx->revs.pending.nr) +add_head_to_pending (&ctx->revs); info.blobs =1 ; info.tags = info.commits = info.trees =0 ; - info.revs = &revs; + info.revs = &ctx->revs; info.path_fn = fill_missing_blobs; info.path_fn_data = ctx;
@@ -109,7 +110,6 @@ static int do_backfill(struct backfill_context *ctx)download_batch (ctx);path_walk_info_clear (&info); -release_revisions (&revs);return ret; }
@@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ int cmd_backfill(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, struct reposit .current_batch = OID_ARRAY_INIT, .min_batch_size = 50000, .sparse = 0, + .revs = REV_INFO_INIT, };struct option options[] = { OPT_UNSIGNED(0, "min-batch-size", &ctx.min_batch_size,
@@ -134,7 +135,12 @@ int cmd_backfill(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, struct reposit builtin_backfill_usage, options); argc =parse_options (argc, argv, prefix, options, builtin_backfill_usage, -0 ); +PARSE_OPT_KEEP_UNKNOWN_OPT | +PARSE_OPT_KEEP_ARGV0 | +PARSE_OPT_KEEP_DASHDASH ); + +repo_init_revisions (repo, &ctx.revs, prefix); + argc =setup_revisions (argc, argv, &ctx.revs,NULL );repo_config (repo, git_default_config,NULL );
@@ -143,5 +149,6 @@ int cmd_backfill(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, struct reposit result =do_backfill (&ctx);backfill_context_clear (&ctx); +release_revisions (&ctx.revs);return result; }
t/t5620-backfill.sh +156 -0
162 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Quoted 5 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
builtin/backfill.c +0
-0
builtin/backfill.c int cmd_backfill(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, struct reposit · line 143
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/backfill.c +6
-1@@ -134,7 +135,12 @@ int cmd_backfill(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, struct reposit builtin_backfill_usage, options); argc =parse_options (argc, argv, prefix, options, builtin_backfill_usage, -0 ); +PARSE_OPT_KEEP_UNKNOWN_OPT | +PARSE_OPT_KEEP_ARGV0 | +PARSE_OPT_KEEP_DASHDASH ); + +repo_init_revisions (repo, &ctx.revs, prefix); + argc =setup_revisions (argc, argv, &ctx.revs,NULL );
We should probably die here in case we still have unknown arguments.
Patrick
Quoted 8 lines · Patrick Steinhardt
Quoted 7 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
builtin/backfill.c +0
-0@@ -134,7 +135,12 @@ int cmd_backfill(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, struct reposit builtin_backfill_usage, options);
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/backfill.c int cmd_backfill(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, struct reposit · line 143
Quoted 8 lines
builtin/backfill.c +6
-1argc =parse_options (argc, argv, prefix, options, builtin_backfill_usage, -0 ); +PARSE_OPT_KEEP_UNKNOWN_OPT | +PARSE_OPT_KEEP_ARGV0 | +PARSE_OPT_KEEP_DASHDASH ); + +repo_init_revisions (repo, &ctx.revs, prefix); + argc =setup_revisions (argc, argv, &ctx.revs,NULL );We should probably die here in case we still have unknown arguments.
That is indeed the fix for the bad test in patch 6. I'll make the necessary update in v3's patch 6 along with the test for it.
Thanks,
-Stolee
PATCH v2 4/6 backfill: work with prefix pathspecs
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The previous change allowed specifying revision arguments over the 'git backfill' command-line. This created the opportunity for restricting the initial commit set by filtering the revision walk through a pathspec. Other than filtering the commit set (and thereby the root trees), this did not restrict the path-walk implementation of 'git backfill' and did not restrict the blobs that were downloaded to only those matching the pathspec.
Update the path-walk API to accept certain kinds of pathspecs and to silently ignore anything too complex, for now. We will update this in the next change to properly restrict to even complex pathspecs.
The current behavior focuses on pathspecs that match paths exactly. This includes exact filenames, including directory names as prefixes. Pathspecs containing wildcards or magic are cleared so the path walk downloads all blobs, as before.
The reason for this restriction is to allow for a faster execution by pruning the path walk to only trees that could contribute towards one of those paths as a parent directory.
The test directory 'd/f/' (next to 'd/file*.txt') was prepared in a previous commit to exercise the subtlety in prefix matching.
--- path-walk.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ path.c | 2 +- path.h | 6 ++++++ t/t5620-backfill.sh | 16 ++++++---------- 4 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
path-walk.c +40 -0
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@#include "list-objects.h" #include "object.h" #include "oid-array.h" +#include "path.h" #include "prio-queue.h" #include "repository.h" #include "revision.h"
@@ -206,6 +207,34 @@ static int add_tree_entries(struct path_walk_context *ctx, match != MATCHED)continue ; } +if (ctx->revs->prune_data.nr) { +struct pathspec *pd = &ctx->revs->prune_data; +bool found = false; + +/* remove '/' for these checks. */ + path.buf[path.len -1 ] =0 ; + +for (int i =0 ; i < pd->nr; i++) { +struct pathspec_item *item = &pd->items[i]; + +/* +* Continue if either is a directory prefix +* of the other. +*/ +if (dir_prefix (path.buf, item->match) || +dir_prefix (item->match, path.buf)) { + found = true; +break ; + } + } + +/* return '/' after these checks. */ + path.buf[path.len -1 ] ='/' ; + +/* Skip paths that do not match the prefix. */ +if (!found) +continue ; + }add_path_to_list (ctx, path.buf, type, &entry.oid, !(o->flags &UNINTERESTING ));
@@ -481,6 +510,17 @@ int walk_objects_by_path(struct path_walk_info *info)if (info->tags) info->revs->tag_objects =1 ; +if (ctx.revs->prune_data.nr) { +/* +* Only exact prefix pathspecs are currently supported. +* Clear any wildcard or magic pathspecs to avoid +* incorrect prefix matching. +*/ +if (ctx.revs->prune_data.has_wildcard || + ctx.revs->prune_data.magic) +clear_pathspec (&ctx.revs->prune_data); + } +/* Insert a single list for the root tree into the paths. */ CALLOC_ARRAY (root_tree_list,1 ); root_tree_list->type =OBJ_TREE ;
path.c +1 -1
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static void strbuf_cleanup_path(struct strbuf *sb)strbuf_remove (sb,0 , path - sb->buf); } -static int dir_prefix (const char *buf,const char *dir) +int dir_prefix (const char *buf,const char *dir) {int len =strlen (dir); return !strncmp(buf, dir, len) &&
path.h +6 -0
@@ -114,6 +114,12 @@ const char *repo_submodule_path_replace(struct repository *repo, const char *fmt, ...) __attribute__((format (printf, 4, 5))); +/* +* Given a directory name 'dir' (not ending with a trailing '/'), +* determine if 'buf' is equal to 'dir' or has prefix 'dir'+'/'. +*/ +int dir_prefix (const char *buf,const char *dir); +void report_linked_checkout_garbage (struct repository *r);/*
t/t5620-backfill.sh +6 -10
@@ -273,13 +273,11 @@ test_expect_success 'backfill with prefix pathspec' ' git -C backfill-path rev-list --quiet --objects --missing=print HEAD >missing && test_line_count = 48 missing && - # TODO: The pathspec should limit the downloaded blobs to - # only those matching the prefix "d/f", but currently all - # blobs are downloaded. - git -C backfill-path backfill HEAD -- d/f && + git -C backfill-path backfill HEAD -- d/f 2>err && + test_must_be_empty err && git -C backfill-path rev-list --quiet --objects --missing=print HEAD >missing && - test_line_count = 0 missing + test_line_count = 40 missing ' test_expect_success 'backfill with multiple pathspecs' '
@@ -292,13 +290,11 @@ test_expect_success 'backfill with multiple pathspecs' ' git -C backfill-path rev-list --quiet --objects --missing=print HEAD >missing && test_line_count = 48 missing && - # TODO: The pathspecs should limit the downloaded blobs to - # only those matching "d/f" or "a", but currently all blobs - # are downloaded. - git -C backfill-path backfill HEAD -- d/f a && + git -C backfill-path backfill HEAD -- d/f a 2>err && + test_must_be_empty err && git -C backfill-path rev-list --quiet --objects --missing=print HEAD >missing && - test_line_count = 0 missing + test_line_count = 16 missing ' test_expect_success 'backfill with wildcard pathspec' '
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] backfill: work with prefix pathspecs
Quoted 5 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
path-walk.c +0
-0
path-walk.c static int add_tree_entries(struct path_walk_context *ctx, · line 215
Quoted 9 lines
path-walk.c +6
-0@@ -206,6 +207,34 @@ static int add_tree_entries(struct path_walk_context *ctx, match != MATCHED)continue ; } +if (ctx->revs->prune_data.nr) { +struct pathspec *pd = &ctx->revs->prune_data; +bool found = false; + +/* remove '/' for these checks. */ + path.buf[path.len -1 ] =0 ;
Hm. Is this _always_ safe to do? We add the directory separator a few lines further up, but only in the case where type == OBJ_TREE. So in reverse this may mean that there are cases where we don't have a trailing '/'.
Maybe we should instead:
did_strip_suffix = strbuf_strip_suffix(path, "/");
...
if (did_strip_suffix)
strbuf_addch(path, "/");Patrick
Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] backfill: work with prefix pathspecs
Quoted 21 lines · Patrick Steinhardt
Quoted 5 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
path-walk.c +0
-0path-walk.c static int add_tree_entries(struct path_walk_context *ctx, · line 215
Quoted 9 lines
path-walk.c +6
-0@@ -206,6 +207,34 @@ static int add_tree_entries(struct path_walk_context *ctx, match != MATCHED)continue ; } +if (ctx->revs->prune_data.nr) { +struct pathspec *pd = &ctx->revs->prune_data; +bool found = false; + +/* remove '/' for these checks. */ + path.buf[path.len -1 ] =0 ;Hm. Is this _always_ safe to do? We add the directory separator a few lines further up, but only in the case where
type == OBJ_TREE. So in reverse this may mean that there are cases where we don't have a trailing '/'.
Quoted 8 lines
Maybe we should instead:
did_strip_suffix = strbuf_strip_suffix(path, "/"); ... if (did_strip_suffix) strbuf_addch(path, "/");
This is much cleaner, too! Thanks.
-Stolee
PATCH v2 5/6 path-walk: support wildcard pathspecs for blob filtering
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Previously, walk_objects_by_path() silently ignored pathspecs containing wildcards or magic by clearing them. This caused all blobs to be downloaded regardless of the given pathspec. Wildcard pathspecs like "d/file.*.txt" are useful for narrowing which blobs to process (e.g., during 'git backfill').
Support wildcard pathspecs by making two changes:
1. Add an 'exact_pathspecs' flag to path_walk_context. When the pathspec has no wildcards or magic, set this flag and use the existing fast-path prefix matching in add_tree_entries(). When wildcards are present, skip that block since prefix matching cannot handle glob patterns.
2. Add a match_pathspec() check in walk_path() to filter out blobs whose full path does not match the pathspec. This provides the actual blob-level filtering for wildcard pathspecs.
--- path-walk.c | 22 +++++++++++++--------- t/t5620-backfill.sh | 7 +++---- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
path-walk.c +13 -9
@@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ struct path_walk_context {*/ struct prio_queue path_stack;struct strset path_stack_pushed; + + unsigned exact_pathspecs:1; };static int compare_by_type (const void *one,const void *two,void *cb_data)
@@ -207,7 +209,7 @@ static int add_tree_entries(struct path_walk_context *ctx, match != MATCHED)continue ; } -if (ctx->revs->prune_data.nr) { +if (ctx->revs->prune_data.nr && ctx->exact_pathspecs) {struct pathspec *pd = &ctx->revs->prune_data;bool found = false;
@@ -303,6 +305,13 @@ static int walk_path(struct path_walk_context *ctx,return 0 ; } +if (list->type ==OBJ_BLOB && + ctx->revs->prune_data.nr && + !match_pathspec (ctx->repo->index, &ctx->revs->prune_data, + path,strlen (path),0 , +NULL ,0 )) +return 0 ; +/* Evaluate function pointer on this data, if requested. */ if ((list->type == OBJ_TREE && ctx->info->trees) || (list->type == OBJ_BLOB && ctx->info->blobs) ||
@@ -511,14 +520,9 @@ int walk_objects_by_path(struct path_walk_info *info) info->revs->tag_objects =1 ;if (ctx.revs->prune_data.nr) { -/* -* Only exact prefix pathspecs are currently supported. -* Clear any wildcard or magic pathspecs to avoid -* incorrect prefix matching. -*/ -if (ctx.revs->prune_data.has_wildcard || - ctx.revs->prune_data.magic) -clear_pathspec (&ctx.revs->prune_data); +if (!ctx.revs->prune_data.has_wildcard && + !ctx.revs->prune_data.magic) + ctx.exact_pathspecs =1 ; }/* Insert a single list for the root tree into the paths. */
t/t5620-backfill.sh +3 -4
@@ -307,12 +307,11 @@ test_expect_success 'backfill with wildcard pathspec' ' git -C backfill-path rev-list --quiet --objects --missing=print HEAD >missing && test_line_count = 48 missing && - # TODO: The wildcard pathspec should limit downloaded blobs, - # but currently all blobs are downloaded. - git -C backfill-path backfill HEAD -- "d/file.*.txt" && + git -C backfill-path backfill HEAD -- "d/file.*.txt" 2>err && + test_must_be_empty err && git -C backfill-path rev-list --quiet --objects --missing=print HEAD >missing && - test_line_count = 0 missing + test_line_count = 40 missing ' test_expect_success 'backfill with --all' '
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v2 6/6 t5620: test backfill's unknown argument handling
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Before the recent changes to parse rev-list arguments inside of 'git backfill', the builtin would take arbitrary arguments without complaint (and ignore them). This was noticed and a patch was sent [1] which motivates this change to encode this behavior in test.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
--- t/t5620-backfill.sh | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
t/t5620-backfill.sh +8 -0
@@ -7,6 +7,14 @@ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME . ./test-lib.sh +test_expect_success 'backfill rejects unexpected arguments' ' + test_must_fail git backfill unexpected-arg 2>err && + test_grep "ambiguous argument .*unexpected-arg" err && + + test_must_fail git backfill --all --firt-parent unexpected-arg 2>err && + test_grep "ambiguous argument .*unexpected-arg" err +' + # We create objects in the 'src' repo. test_expect_success 'setup repo for object creation' ' echo "{print \$1}" >print_1.awk &&
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] t5620: test backfill's unknown argument handling
Quoted 20 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Before the recent changes to parse rev-list arguments inside of 'git backfill', the builtin would take arbitrary arguments without complaint (and ignore them). This was noticed and a patch was sent [1] which motivates this change to encode this behavior in test.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
Reported-by Siddharth Shrimali <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>--- t/t5620-backfill.sh | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)t/t5620-backfill.sh +0
-0
t/t5620-backfill.sh export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME · line 16
Quoted 10 lines
t/t5620-backfill.sh +7
-0@@ -7,6 +7,14 @@ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME . ./test-lib.sh +test_expect_success 'backfill rejects unexpected arguments' ' + test_must_fail git backfill unexpected-arg 2>err && + test_grep "ambiguous argument .*unexpected-arg" err && + + test_must_fail git backfill --all --firt-parent unexpected-arg 2>err && + test_grep "ambiguous argument .*unexpected-arg" err +'
Hmph, I would have expected that an earlier --firt-parent on the command line would trigger "unknown option" instead.
Having said that, if the code lets the setup_revisions() parse the command line, the usual "unless disambiguated with a double-dash '--', stop at the first non-revision and take everything as paths but for safety all of them must refer to an existing path in the working tree" behaviour should trigger, and it is not specific to "backfill", and may already be tested centrally (if not, I do not object to such a new set of tests).
For any cmd that take revisions and pathspec (e.g., log, rev-list, grep) these should hold true:
$ git $cmd [<options>]... Makefile HEAD
Without disambiguation the command should say "Ah, Makefile is not a revision, so we will see no more revisions, and everything, including the current one we are looking at, must be an existing path on the working tree", and barfs on HEAD that does not exist as a file/directory.
$ git $cmd [<options>]... Makefile -- HEAD
With disambiguation, the command should verify everything before the double-dash to be a rev, and barf that Makefile is not a rev.
$ git $cmd [<options>]... -- Makefile HEAD
With disambiguation, the command should take everything after the double-dash to be a pathspec element without barfing. After all, it may be referring to a path that used to exist in some revision the command will look at.
Thanks.
Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] t5620: test backfill's unknown argument handling
Quoted 25 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 23 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Before the recent changes to parse rev-list arguments inside of 'git backfill', the builtin would take arbitrary arguments without complaint (and ignore them). This was noticed and a patch was sent [1] which motivates this change to encode this behavior in test.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
Reported-by Siddharth Shrimali <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>--- t/t5620-backfill.sh | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)t/t5620-backfill.sh +0
-0@@ -7,6 +7,14 @@ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME . ./test-lib.sh
Quoted 10 lines
t/t5620-backfill.sh export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME · line 16
Quoted 7 lines
t/t5620-backfill.sh +7
-0+test_expect_success 'backfill rejects unexpected arguments' ' + test_must_fail git backfill unexpected-arg 2>err && + test_grep "ambiguous argument .*unexpected-arg" err && + + test_must_fail git backfill --all --firt-parent unexpected-arg 2>err && + test_grep "ambiguous argument .*unexpected-arg" err +'Hmph, I would have expected that an earlier --firt-parent on the command line would trigger "unknown option" instead.
Interesting that my mistype has demonstrated an interesting behavior here. It turns out that random options starting with '--' are accepted here, including --unexpected-arg.
This means that we actually have room here for some improvement!
I'll see what can be done to make even these arguments be seen as failures.
Quoted 7 lines
Having said that, if the code lets the
setup_revisions()parse the command line, the usual "unless disambiguated with a double-dash '--', stop at the first non-revision and take everything as paths but for safety all of them must refer to an existing path in the working tree" behaviour should trigger, and it is not specific to "backfill", and may already be tested centrally (if not, I do not object to such a new set of tests).
Thanks,
-Stolee
v3 cover backfill: accept revision arguments
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetThe git backfill command assists in downloading missing blobs for blobless partial clones. However, its current version lacks some valuable functionality. It currently:
1. Only walks commits reachable from HEAD.
2. It walks all reachable commits to the full history.
3. It can focus on the current sparse-checkout definition, but otherwise it doesn't focus on a given pathspec.
All of these are being updated by this patch series, which allows rev-list options to impact the path-walk. These include:
1. Specifying a given refspec, including --all.
2. Modifying the commit walk, including --first-parent, commit ranges, or
recency using --since.
3. Modifying the set of paths to download using pathspecs.
One particularly valuable situation here is that now a user can run git backfill -- <path> to download all versions of a specific file or a specific directory, accelerating history queries within that path without downloading more than necessary. This can accelerate git blame or git log -L for these paths, where normally those commands download missing blobs one-by-one during its diff algorithms.
This patch series is organized in the following way:
1. A missing #include is added to prevent future compilation issues.
2. The test repo in t5620 is expanded to make later tests more interesting.
3. The backfill builtin parses the rev-list arguments. We test the top arguments that work as expected, though the pathspec arguments need extra work.
4. Update the path-walk logic to work efficiently with some pathspecs, such as fixed prefix pathspecs, accelerating the computation.
5. For more complicated pathspecs, do a post-filter in builtin/backfill.c instead of restricting the walk in the path-walk API.
The main goal of this series is to make such customizations possible, and to improve performance where common use cases are expected. I'm open to feedback as to whether we should consider more detailed performance analysis or whether we should wait for how users interact with these new options before overoptimizing unlikely use cases.
Updates in v2
=============
* Hard stops are replaced with a comma (and no punctuation) in the docs.
* add_head_to_pending() simplifies some code.
* My poor explanation of "starting commits" is updated.
* Language around temporary prefix restriction is clarified.
* Prefix match logic is simplified with dir_prefix().
* Temporary memory leak (introduced in v1's patch 4 and removed in v1's patch 5) is removed in v2's patch 4.
* Commit pruning is reenabled in v2's patch 5. There was no need for that with the way the logic works in the patch.
* Add a new patch with a test demonstrating the new behavior that was being discussed in [1].
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
Updates in v3
=============
* Fixed the argument checks to actually catch unknown arguments, because the revision machinery will skip unknown options starting with --.
Thanks, -Stolee
Derrick Stolee (6):
revision: include object-name.h
t5620: prepare branched repo for revision tests
backfill: accept revision arguments
backfill: work with prefix pathspecs
path-walk: support wildcard pathspecs for blob filtering
t5620: test backfill's unknown argument handling
Documentation/git-backfill.adoc | 5 +- builtin/backfill.c | 22 +++- path-walk.c | 43 +++++++ path.c | 2 +- path.h | 6 + revision.h | 1 + t/t5620-backfill.sh | 211 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 7 files changed, 280 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
base-commit: 67ad42147a7acc2af6074753ebd03d904476118f
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-2070%2Fderrickstolee%2Fbackfill-revs-v3
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-2070/derrickstolee/backfill-revs-v3
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/2070
Range-diff vs v2:
1: fda0239103 = 1: fda0239103 revision: include object-name.h
2: 55a45b2fc8 = 2: 55a45b2fc8 t5620: prepare branched repo for revision tests
3: 610a162973 = 3: 610a162973 backfill: accept revision arguments
4: f8f2c61326 ! 4: 7223124fb3 backfill: work with prefix pathspecs
@@ path-walk.c: static int add_tree_entries(struct path_walk_context *ctx,
+ if (ctx->revs->prune_data.nr) {
+ struct pathspec *pd = &ctx->revs->prune_data;
+ bool found = false;
++ int did_strip_suffix = strbuf_strip_suffix(&path, "/");
+
-+ /* remove '/' for these checks. */
-+ path.buf[path.len - 1] = 0;
+
+ for (int i = 0; i < pd->nr; i++) {
+ struct pathspec_item *item = &pd->items[i];
@@ path-walk.c: static int add_tree_entries(struct path_walk_context *ctx,
+ }
+ }
+
-+ /* return '/' after these checks. */
-+ path.buf[path.len - 1] = '/';
++ if (did_strip_suffix)
++ strbuf_addch(&path, '/');
+
+ /* Skip paths that do not match the prefix. */
+ if (!found)
5: 1168edfb96 ! 5: 1ea278bd10 path-walk: support wildcard pathspecs for blob filtering
@@ path-walk.c: static int add_tree_entries(struct path_walk_context *ctx,
+ if (ctx->revs->prune_data.nr && ctx->exact_pathspecs) {
struct pathspec *pd = &ctx->revs->prune_data;
bool found = false;
-
+ int did_strip_suffix = strbuf_strip_suffix(&path, "/");
@@ path-walk.c: static int walk_path(struct path_walk_context *ctx,
return 0;
} 6: 9699650aa7 ! 6: b6423f9595 t5620: test backfill's unknown argument handling
@@ Commit message
Before the recent changes to parse rev-list arguments inside of 'git backfill', the builtin would take arbitrary arguments without complaint (and
- ignore them). This was noticed and a patch was sent [1] which motivates this
- change to encode this behavior in test.
+ ignore them). This was noticed and a patch was sent [1] which motivates
+ this change.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
+ Note that the revision machinery can output an "ambiguous argument"
+ warning if a value not starting with '--' is found and doesn't make
+ sense as a reference or a pathspec. For unrecognized arguments starting
+ with '--' we need to add logic into builtin/backfill.c to catch leftover
+ arguments.
+
+ ## builtin/backfill.c ##
+@@ builtin/backfill.c: int cmd_backfill(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, struct reposit
+ repo_init_revisions(repo, &ctx.revs, prefix);
+ argc = setup_revisions(argc, argv, &ctx.revs, NULL);
+
++ if (argc > 1)
++ die(_("unrecognized argument: %s"), argv[1]);
++
+ repo_config(repo, git_default_config, NULL);
+
+ if (ctx.sparse < 0)
+
## t/t5620-backfill.sh ##
@@ t/t5620-backfill.sh: export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME
@@ t/t5620-backfill.sh: export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME
+ test_must_fail git backfill unexpected-arg 2>err &&
+ test_grep "ambiguous argument .*unexpected-arg" err &&
+
-+ test_must_fail git backfill --all --firt-parent unexpected-arg 2>err &&
-+ test_grep "ambiguous argument .*unexpected-arg" err
++ test_must_fail git backfill --all --unexpected-arg --first-parent 2>err &&
++ test_grep "unrecognized argument: --unexpected-arg" err
+'
+
# We create objects in the 'src' repo.
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 1/6 revision: include object-name.h
From: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The REV_INFO_INIT macro includes a use of the DEFAULT_ABBREV macro, which is defined in object-name.h. Include it in revision.h so consumers of REV_INFO_INIT do not need to include this hidden dependency.
--- revision.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
revision.h +1 -0
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@#include "commit.h" #include "grep.h" #include "notes.h" +#include "object-name.h" #include "oidset.h" #include "pretty.h" #include "diff.h"
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 2/6 t5620: prepare branched repo for revision tests
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Prepare the test infrastructure for upcoming changes that teach 'git backfill' to accept revision arguments and pathspecs.
Add test_tick before each commit in the setup loop so that commit dates are deterministic. This enables reliable testing with '--since'.
Rename the 'd/e/' directory to 'd/f/' so that the prefix 'd/f' is ambiguous with the files 'd/file.*.txt'. This exercises the subtlety in prefix pathspec matching that will be added in a later commit.
Create a branched version of the test repository (src-revs) with:
- A 'side' branch merged into main, adding s/file.{1,2}.txt with two versions (4 new blobs, 52 total from main HEAD).
- An unmerged 'other' branch adding o/file.{1,2}.txt (2 more blobs, 54 total reachable from --all).
This structure makes --all, --first-parent, and --since produce meaningfully different results when used with 'git backfill'.
--- t/t5620-backfill.sh | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
t/t5620-backfill.sh +50 -2
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup repo for object creation' ' git init src && mkdir -p src/a/b/c && - mkdir -p src/d/e && + mkdir -p src/d/f && for i in 1 2 do
@@ -26,8 +26,9 @@ test_expect_success 'setup repo for object creation' ' echo "Version $i of file a/b/$n" > src/a/b/file.$n.txt && echo "Version $i of file a/b/c/$n" > src/a/b/c/file.$n.txt && echo "Version $i of file d/$n" > src/d/file.$n.txt && - echo "Version $i of file d/e/$n" > src/d/e/file.$n.txt && + echo "Version $i of file d/f/$n" > src/d/f/file.$n.txt && git -C src add . && + test_tick && git -C src commit -m "Iteration $n" || return 1 done done
@@ -41,6 +42,53 @@ test_expect_success 'setup bare clone for server' ' git -C srv.bare config --local uploadpack.allowanysha1inwant 1 ' +# Create a version of the repo with branches for testing revision +# arguments like --all, --first-parent, and --since. +# +# main: 8 commits (linear) + merge of side branch +# 48 original blobs + 4 side blobs = 52 blobs from main HEAD +# side: 2 commits adding s/file.{1,2}.txt (v1, v2), merged into main +# other: 1 commit adding o/file.{1,2}.txt (not merged) +# 54 total blobs reachable from --all +test_expect_success 'setup branched repo for revision tests' ' + git clone src src-revs && + + # Side branch from tip of main with unique files + git -C src-revs checkout -b side HEAD && + mkdir -p src-revs/s && + echo "Side version 1 of file 1" >src-revs/s/file.1.txt && + echo "Side version 1 of file 2" >src-revs/s/file.2.txt && + test_tick && + git -C src-revs add . && + git -C src-revs commit -m "Side commit 1" && + + echo "Side version 2 of file 1" >src-revs/s/file.1.txt && + echo "Side version 2 of file 2" >src-revs/s/file.2.txt && + test_tick && + git -C src-revs add . && + git -C src-revs commit -m "Side commit 2" && + + # Merge side into main + git -C src-revs checkout main && + test_tick && + git -C src-revs merge side --no-ff -m "Merge side branch" && + + # Other branch (not merged) for --all testing + git -C src-revs checkout -b other main~1 && + mkdir -p src-revs/o && + echo "Other content 1" >src-revs/o/file.1.txt && + echo "Other content 2" >src-revs/o/file.2.txt && + test_tick && + git -C src-revs add . && + git -C src-revs commit -m "Other commit" && + + git -C src-revs checkout main && + + git clone --bare "file://$(pwd)/src-revs" srv-revs.bare && + git -C srv-revs.bare config --local uploadpack.allowfilter 1 && + git -C srv-revs.bare config --local uploadpack.allowanysha1inwant 1 +' + # do basic partial clone from "srv.bare" test_expect_success 'do partial clone 1, backfill gets all objects' ' git clone --no-checkout --filter=blob:none \
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 3/6 backfill: accept revision arguments
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The existing implementation of 'git backfill' only includes downloading missing blobs reachable from HEAD. Advanced uses may desire more general commit limiting options, such as '--all' for all references, specifying a commit range via negative references, or specifying a recency of use such as with '--since=<date>'.
All of these options are available if we use setup_revisions() to parse the unknown arguments with the revision machinery. This opens up a large number of possibilities, only a small set of which are tested here.
For documentation, we avoid duplicating the option documentation and instead link to the documentation of 'git rev-list'.
Note that these arguments currently allow specifying a pathspec, which modifies the commit history checks but does not limit the paths used in the backfill logic. This will be updated in a future change.
--- Documentation/git-backfill.adoc | 5 +- builtin/backfill.c | 19 ++-- t/t5620-backfill.sh | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 173 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-backfill.adoc +4 -1
@@ -63,9 +63,12 @@ OPTIONS current sparse-checkout. If the sparse-checkout feature is enabled, then `--sparse` is assumed and can be disabled with `--no-sparse`. +You may also specify the commit limiting options from linkgit:git-rev-list[1]. + SEE ALSO -------- -linkgit:git-clone[1]. +linkgit:git-clone[1], +linkgit:git-rev-list[1] GIT ---
builtin/backfill.c +13 -6
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct backfill_context {struct oid_array current_batch;size_t min_batch_size;int sparse; +struct rev_info revs; };static void backfill_context_clear (struct backfill_context *ctx)
@@ -80,7 +81,6 @@ static int fill_missing_blobs(const char *path UNUSED,static int do_backfill (struct backfill_context *ctx) { -struct rev_info revs;struct path_walk_info info =PATH_WALK_INFO_INIT ;int ret;
@@ -92,13 +92,14 @@ static int do_backfill(struct backfill_context *ctx) } } -repo_init_revisions (ctx->repo, &revs,"" ); -handle_revision_arg ("HEAD" , &revs,0 ,0 ); +/* Walk from HEAD if otherwise unspecified. */ +if (!ctx->revs.pending.nr) +add_head_to_pending (&ctx->revs); info.blobs =1 ; info.tags = info.commits = info.trees =0 ; - info.revs = &revs; + info.revs = &ctx->revs; info.path_fn = fill_missing_blobs; info.path_fn_data = ctx;
@@ -109,7 +110,6 @@ static int do_backfill(struct backfill_context *ctx)download_batch (ctx);path_walk_info_clear (&info); -release_revisions (&revs);return ret; }
@@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ int cmd_backfill(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, struct reposit .current_batch = OID_ARRAY_INIT, .min_batch_size = 50000, .sparse = 0, + .revs = REV_INFO_INIT, };struct option options[] = { OPT_UNSIGNED(0, "min-batch-size", &ctx.min_batch_size,
@@ -134,7 +135,12 @@ int cmd_backfill(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, struct reposit builtin_backfill_usage, options); argc =parse_options (argc, argv, prefix, options, builtin_backfill_usage, -0 ); +PARSE_OPT_KEEP_UNKNOWN_OPT | +PARSE_OPT_KEEP_ARGV0 | +PARSE_OPT_KEEP_DASHDASH ); + +repo_init_revisions (repo, &ctx.revs, prefix); + argc =setup_revisions (argc, argv, &ctx.revs,NULL );repo_config (repo, git_default_config,NULL );
@@ -143,5 +149,6 @@ int cmd_backfill(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, struct reposit result =do_backfill (&ctx);backfill_context_clear (&ctx); +release_revisions (&ctx.revs);return result; }
t/t5620-backfill.sh +156 -0
162 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 4/6 backfill: work with prefix pathspecs
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
The previous change allowed specifying revision arguments over the 'git backfill' command-line. This created the opportunity for restricting the initial commit set by filtering the revision walk through a pathspec. Other than filtering the commit set (and thereby the root trees), this did not restrict the path-walk implementation of 'git backfill' and did not restrict the blobs that were downloaded to only those matching the pathspec.
Update the path-walk API to accept certain kinds of pathspecs and to silently ignore anything too complex, for now. We will update this in the next change to properly restrict to even complex pathspecs.
The current behavior focuses on pathspecs that match paths exactly. This includes exact filenames, including directory names as prefixes. Pathspecs containing wildcards or magic are cleared so the path walk downloads all blobs, as before.
The reason for this restriction is to allow for a faster execution by pruning the path walk to only trees that could contribute towards one of those paths as a parent directory.
The test directory 'd/f/' (next to 'd/file*.txt') was prepared in a previous commit to exercise the subtlety in prefix matching.
--- path-walk.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ path.c | 2 +- path.h | 6 ++++++ t/t5620-backfill.sh | 16 ++++++---------- 4 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
path-walk.c +39 -0
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@#include "list-objects.h" #include "object.h" #include "oid-array.h" +#include "path.h" #include "prio-queue.h" #include "repository.h" #include "revision.h"
@@ -206,6 +207,33 @@ static int add_tree_entries(struct path_walk_context *ctx, match != MATCHED)continue ; } +if (ctx->revs->prune_data.nr) { +struct pathspec *pd = &ctx->revs->prune_data; +bool found = false; +int did_strip_suffix =strbuf_strip_suffix (&path,"/" ); + + +for (int i =0 ; i < pd->nr; i++) { +struct pathspec_item *item = &pd->items[i]; + +/* +* Continue if either is a directory prefix +* of the other. +*/ +if (dir_prefix (path.buf, item->match) || +dir_prefix (item->match, path.buf)) { + found = true; +break ; + } + } + +if (did_strip_suffix) +strbuf_addch (&path,'/' ); + +/* Skip paths that do not match the prefix. */ +if (!found) +continue ; + }add_path_to_list (ctx, path.buf, type, &entry.oid, !(o->flags &UNINTERESTING ));
@@ -481,6 +509,17 @@ int walk_objects_by_path(struct path_walk_info *info)if (info->tags) info->revs->tag_objects =1 ; +if (ctx.revs->prune_data.nr) { +/* +* Only exact prefix pathspecs are currently supported. +* Clear any wildcard or magic pathspecs to avoid +* incorrect prefix matching. +*/ +if (ctx.revs->prune_data.has_wildcard || + ctx.revs->prune_data.magic) +clear_pathspec (&ctx.revs->prune_data); + } +/* Insert a single list for the root tree into the paths. */ CALLOC_ARRAY (root_tree_list,1 ); root_tree_list->type =OBJ_TREE ;
path.c +1 -1
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static void strbuf_cleanup_path(struct strbuf *sb)strbuf_remove (sb,0 , path - sb->buf); } -static int dir_prefix (const char *buf,const char *dir) +int dir_prefix (const char *buf,const char *dir) {int len =strlen (dir); return !strncmp(buf, dir, len) &&
path.h +6 -0
@@ -114,6 +114,12 @@ const char *repo_submodule_path_replace(struct repository *repo, const char *fmt, ...) __attribute__((format (printf, 4, 5))); +/* +* Given a directory name 'dir' (not ending with a trailing '/'), +* determine if 'buf' is equal to 'dir' or has prefix 'dir'+'/'. +*/ +int dir_prefix (const char *buf,const char *dir); +void report_linked_checkout_garbage (struct repository *r);/*
t/t5620-backfill.sh +6 -10
@@ -273,13 +273,11 @@ test_expect_success 'backfill with prefix pathspec' ' git -C backfill-path rev-list --quiet --objects --missing=print HEAD >missing && test_line_count = 48 missing && - # TODO: The pathspec should limit the downloaded blobs to - # only those matching the prefix "d/f", but currently all - # blobs are downloaded. - git -C backfill-path backfill HEAD -- d/f && + git -C backfill-path backfill HEAD -- d/f 2>err && + test_must_be_empty err && git -C backfill-path rev-list --quiet --objects --missing=print HEAD >missing && - test_line_count = 0 missing + test_line_count = 40 missing ' test_expect_success 'backfill with multiple pathspecs' '
@@ -292,13 +290,11 @@ test_expect_success 'backfill with multiple pathspecs' ' git -C backfill-path rev-list --quiet --objects --missing=print HEAD >missing && test_line_count = 48 missing && - # TODO: The pathspecs should limit the downloaded blobs to - # only those matching "d/f" or "a", but currently all blobs - # are downloaded. - git -C backfill-path backfill HEAD -- d/f a && + git -C backfill-path backfill HEAD -- d/f a 2>err && + test_must_be_empty err && git -C backfill-path rev-list --quiet --objects --missing=print HEAD >missing && - test_line_count = 0 missing + test_line_count = 16 missing ' test_expect_success 'backfill with wildcard pathspec' '
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 5/6 path-walk: support wildcard pathspecs for blob filtering
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Previously, walk_objects_by_path() silently ignored pathspecs containing wildcards or magic by clearing them. This caused all blobs to be downloaded regardless of the given pathspec. Wildcard pathspecs like "d/file.*.txt" are useful for narrowing which blobs to process (e.g., during 'git backfill').
Support wildcard pathspecs by making two changes:
1. Add an 'exact_pathspecs' flag to path_walk_context. When the pathspec has no wildcards or magic, set this flag and use the existing fast-path prefix matching in add_tree_entries(). When wildcards are present, skip that block since prefix matching cannot handle glob patterns.
2. Add a match_pathspec() check in walk_path() to filter out blobs whose full path does not match the pathspec. This provides the actual blob-level filtering for wildcard pathspecs.
--- path-walk.c | 22 +++++++++++++--------- t/t5620-backfill.sh | 7 +++---- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
path-walk.c +13 -9
@@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ struct path_walk_context {*/ struct prio_queue path_stack;struct strset path_stack_pushed; + + unsigned exact_pathspecs:1; };static int compare_by_type (const void *one,const void *two,void *cb_data)
@@ -207,7 +209,7 @@ static int add_tree_entries(struct path_walk_context *ctx, match != MATCHED)continue ; } -if (ctx->revs->prune_data.nr) { +if (ctx->revs->prune_data.nr && ctx->exact_pathspecs) {struct pathspec *pd = &ctx->revs->prune_data;bool found = false;int did_strip_suffix =strbuf_strip_suffix (&path,"/" );
@@ -302,6 +304,13 @@ static int walk_path(struct path_walk_context *ctx,return 0 ; } +if (list->type ==OBJ_BLOB && + ctx->revs->prune_data.nr && + !match_pathspec (ctx->repo->index, &ctx->revs->prune_data, + path,strlen (path),0 , +NULL ,0 )) +return 0 ; +/* Evaluate function pointer on this data, if requested. */ if ((list->type == OBJ_TREE && ctx->info->trees) || (list->type == OBJ_BLOB && ctx->info->blobs) ||
@@ -510,14 +519,9 @@ int walk_objects_by_path(struct path_walk_info *info) info->revs->tag_objects =1 ;if (ctx.revs->prune_data.nr) { -/* -* Only exact prefix pathspecs are currently supported. -* Clear any wildcard or magic pathspecs to avoid -* incorrect prefix matching. -*/ -if (ctx.revs->prune_data.has_wildcard || - ctx.revs->prune_data.magic) -clear_pathspec (&ctx.revs->prune_data); +if (!ctx.revs->prune_data.has_wildcard && + !ctx.revs->prune_data.magic) + ctx.exact_pathspecs =1 ; }/* Insert a single list for the root tree into the paths. */
t/t5620-backfill.sh +3 -4
@@ -307,12 +307,11 @@ test_expect_success 'backfill with wildcard pathspec' ' git -C backfill-path rev-list --quiet --objects --missing=print HEAD >missing && test_line_count = 48 missing && - # TODO: The wildcard pathspec should limit downloaded blobs, - # but currently all blobs are downloaded. - git -C backfill-path backfill HEAD -- "d/file.*.txt" && + git -C backfill-path backfill HEAD -- "d/file.*.txt" 2>err && + test_must_be_empty err && git -C backfill-path rev-list --quiet --objects --missing=print HEAD >missing && - test_line_count = 0 missing + test_line_count = 40 missing ' test_expect_success 'backfill with --all' '
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v3 6/6 t5620: test backfill's unknown argument handling
In reply to Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadgetFrom: Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Before the recent changes to parse rev-list arguments inside of 'git backfill', the builtin would take arbitrary arguments without complaint (and ignore them). This was noticed and a patch was sent [1] which motivates this change.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
Note that the revision machinery can output an "ambiguous argument" warning if a value not starting with '--' is found and doesn't make sense as a reference or a pathspec. For unrecognized arguments starting with '--' we need to add logic into builtin/backfill.c to catch leftover arguments.
--- builtin/backfill.c | 3 +++ t/t5620-backfill.sh | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
builtin/backfill.c +3 -0
@@ -142,6 +142,9 @@ int cmd_backfill(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, struct repositrepo_init_revisions (repo, &ctx.revs, prefix); argc =setup_revisions (argc, argv, &ctx.revs,NULL ); +if (argc >1 ) +die (_ ("unrecognized argument: %s" ), argv[1 ]); +repo_config (repo, git_default_config,NULL );if (ctx.sparse <0 )
t/t5620-backfill.sh +8 -0
@@ -7,6 +7,14 @@ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME . ./test-lib.sh +test_expect_success 'backfill rejects unexpected arguments' ' + test_must_fail git backfill unexpected-arg 2>err && + test_grep "ambiguous argument .*unexpected-arg" err && + + test_must_fail git backfill --all --unexpected-arg --first-parent 2>err && + test_grep "unrecognized argument: --unexpected-arg" err +' + # We create objects in the 'src' repo. test_expect_success 'setup repo for object creation' ' echo "{print \$1}" >print_1.awk &&
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Quoted 21 lines · Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
6:
9699650aa7! 6:b6423f9595t5620: test backfill's unknown argument handling
@@ Commit messageBefore the recent changes to parse rev-list arguments inside of 'git backfill', the builtin would take arbitrary arguments without complaint (and
- ignore them). This was noticed and a patch was sent [1] which motivates this
- change to encode this behavior in test.
+ ignore them). This was noticed and a patch was sent [1] which motivates
+ this change.[1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/[email protected]/
+ Note that the revision machinery can output an "ambiguous argument"
+ warning if a value not starting with '--' is found and doesn't make
+ sense as a reference or a pathspec. For unrecognized arguments starting
+ with '--' we need to add logic intobuiltin/backfill.cto catch leftover
+ arguments.
+Reported-by Siddharth Shrimali <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Derrick Stolee <[email protected]>
Quoted 13 lines
+ ##
builtin/backfill.c##
+@@builtin/backfill.c: int cmd_backfill(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix, struct reposit
+repo_init_revisions(repo, &ctx.revs, prefix);
+ argc =setup_revisions(argc, argv, &ctx.revs, NULL);
+
++ if (argc > 1)
++die(_("unrecognized argument: %s"), argv[1]);
++
+repo_config(repo, git_default_config, NULL);
+
+ if (ctx.sparse < 0)
+
##t/t5620-backfill.sh##
I would've expected this chunk to already come in patch 3, but that alone isn't really worth a reroll. All the other changes look good to me, thanks!
Patrick