checkout: add --autostash option for branch switching
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 checkout: add --autostash option for branch switching
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
When switching branches, local modifications in the working tree can prevent the checkout from succeeding. While "git rebase" and "git merge" already support --autostash to handle this case automatically, "git checkout" and "git switch" require users to manually stash and unstash their changes.
Teach "git checkout" and "git switch" to accept --autostash and --no-autostash options that automatically create a temporary stash entry before the branch switch begins and apply it after the switch completes. If the stash application results in conflicts, the stash entry is saved to the stash list so the user can resolve them later.
Also add a checkout.autoStash configuration option that enables this behavior by default, which can be overridden with --no-autostash on the command line.
---
checkout: 'autostash' for branch switching
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-2234%2FHaraldNordgren%2Fcheckout_autostash-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-2234/HaraldNordgren/checkout_autostash-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/2234
Documentation/config/checkout.adoc | 12 ++ Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 9 ++ Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 9 ++ builtin/checkout.c | 16 +++ t/meson.build | 1 + t/t2061-switch-autostash.sh | 181 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t9902-completion.sh | 1 + 7 files changed, 229 insertions(+) create mode 100755 t/t2061-switch-autostash.sh
Documentation/config/checkout.adoc +12 -0
@@ -36,6 +36,18 @@ with a small number of cores, the default sequential checkout often performs better. The size and compression level of a repository might also influence how well the parallel version performs. +`checkout.autoStash`:: + When set to true, automatically create a temporary stash entry + before the operation begins, and apply it after the operation + ends. This means that you can run `git checkout` or `git switch` + on a dirty worktree. However, use with care: the final stash + application after a successful branch switch might result in + non-trivial conflicts. + This option can be overridden by the `--no-autostash` and + `--autostash` options of linkgit:git-checkout[1] and + linkgit:git-switch[1]. + Defaults to false. + `checkout.thresholdForParallelism`:: When running parallel checkout with a small number of files, the cost of subprocess spawning and inter-process communication might outweigh
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +9 -0
@@ -272,6 +272,15 @@ When switching branches with `--merge`, staged changes may be lost. `merge.conflictStyle` configuration variable. Possible values are `merge` (default), `diff3`, and `zdiff3`. +`--autostash`:: +`--no-autostash`:: + When switching branches, automatically create a temporary stash + entry before the operation begins, and apply it after the + operation ends. This means that you can switch branches on a + dirty worktree. However, use with care: the final stash + application after a successful branch switch might result in + non-trivial conflicts. + `-p`:: `--patch`:: Interactively select hunks in the difference between the
Documentation/git-switch.adoc +9 -0
@@ -142,6 +142,15 @@ should result in deletion of the path). `merge.conflictStyle` configuration variable. Possible values are `merge` (default), `diff3`, and `zdiff3`. +`--autostash`:: +`--no-autostash`:: + Automatically create a temporary stash entry before the + operation begins, and apply it after the operation ends. + This means that you can switch branches on a dirty worktree. + However, use with care: the final stash application after a + successful branch switch might result in non-trivial + conflicts. + `-q`:: `--quiet`:: Quiet, suppress feedback messages.
builtin/checkout.c +16 -0
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@#include "repo-settings.h" #include "resolve-undo.h" #include "revision.h" +#include "sequencer.h" #include "setup.h" #include "submodule.h" #include "symlinks.h"
@@ -68,6 +69,7 @@ struct checkout_opts {int only_merge_on_switching_branches;int can_switch_when_in_progress;int orphan_from_empty_tree; +int autostash;int empty_pathspec_ok;int checkout_index;int checkout_worktree;
@@ -1202,9 +1204,16 @@ static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts, do_merge =0 ; } +if (opts->autostash) { +if (repo_read_index (the_repository) <0 ) +die (_ ("index file corrupt" )); +create_autostash_ref (the_repository,"CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH" ); + } +if (do_merge) { ret =merge_working_tree (opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info, &writeout_error);if (ret) { +apply_autostash_ref (the_repository,"CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH" );branch_info_release (&old_branch_info);return ret; }
@@ -1215,6 +1224,8 @@ static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,update_refs_for_switch (opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info); +apply_autostash_ref (the_repository,"CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH" ); + ret =post_checkout_hook (old_branch_info.commit, new_branch_info->commit,1 );branch_info_release (&old_branch_info);
@@ -1236,6 +1247,10 @@ static int git_checkout_config(const char *var, const char *value, opts->dwim_new_local_branch =git_config_bool (var, value);return 0 ; } +if (!strcmp (var,"checkout.autostash" )) { + opts->autostash =git_config_bool (var, value); +return 0 ; + }if (starts_with (var,"submodule." ))return git_default_submodule_config (var, value,NULL );
@@ -1745,6 +1760,7 @@ static struct option *add_common_switch_branch_options( PARSE_OPT_NOCOMPLETE),OPT_BOOL (0 ,"ignore-other-worktrees" , &opts->ignore_other_worktrees,N_ ("do not check if another worktree is using this branch" )), +OPT_AUTOSTASH (&opts->autostash), OPT_END() };struct option *newopts =parse_options_concat (prevopts, options);
t/meson.build +1 -0
@@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ integration_tests = [ 't2030-unresolve-info.sh', 't2050-git-dir-relative.sh', 't2060-switch.sh', + 't2061-switch-autostash.sh', 't2070-restore.sh', 't2071-restore-patch.sh', 't2072-restore-pathspec-file.sh',
t/t2061-switch-autostash.sh new file +181 -0
181 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t9902-completion.sh +1 -0
@@ -2602,6 +2602,7 @@ test_expect_success 'double dash "git checkout"' ' --ignore-other-worktrees Z --recurse-submodules Z --auto-advance Z + --autostash Z --progress Z --guess Z --no-guess Z
base-commit: 7f19e4e1b6a3ad259e2ed66033e01e03b8b74c5e
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Quoted 14 lines · Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
When switching branches, local modifications in the working tree can prevent the checkout from succeeding. While "git rebase" and "git merge" already support --autostash to handle this case automatically, "git checkout" and "git switch" require users to manually stash and unstash their changes.
Teach "git checkout" and "git switch" to accept --autostash and --no-autostash options that automatically create a temporary stash entry before the branch switch begins and apply it after the switch completes. If the stash application results in conflicts, the stash entry is saved to the stash list so the user can resolve them later.
Quoted 3 lines
Also add a checkout.autoStash configuration option that enables this behavior by default, which can be overridden with --no-autostash on the command line.
Unconditionally always stash when checkout happens? This feature as implemented does not have to be a separate feature. It can be done by end-users as a short-cut for "stash" followed by "checkout" via alias or custom command.
Perhaps doing it this way would make it more worth doing?
- At the beginning of branch switching, ask a new helper function that takes the branch we are switching to as an argument this question:
Do any paths that are different between the current branch and the branch we are switching to have local (i.e., either in the index or in the working tree) change [Yes/No]?
- When the answer is "yes", save the local changes to a new stash entry, and clear the local changes from the index and from the working tree. If not, do not bother with stash at all.
- Switch to other branch the usual way. This will never conflict.
- If we created a stash entry earlier, try to unstash it. It may conflict or it may not.
- If it does not conflict, then we are done. We drop that stash entry, and tell nothing about the stash to the user, as there is nothing they can do to the now-consumed stash.
- If it does conflict, tell the user that the original change is in the stash, and can be used to recover if you botch the conflict resolution, and also tell the user that they need to drop the stash entry once they are done with the change that caused this current conflict.
Essentially, the new "autostaash only when needed" would become a much better reimplementation of the "-m" option. From the point of view of a user who is used to "checkout -m", the basic workflow would be the same, only with vast improvement.
- It may not conflict and merge cleanly, in which case they do not have to do anything. This is the same as status quo.
- It may conflict and they find it too involved to resolve right at the moment, in which case they now have a choiceto say "git reset --hard", essentially declaring "I prioritize working on this new branch; I'll deal with the work in progress I started on the previous branch later", and then later they can "git stash pop" to deal with it.
Which is a vast improvement over the current "-m" that gives you only one chance to resolve it right.
- It may conflict and they may be able to resolve cleanly, in which case they have to remember that they need to do an extra thing (i.e., drop the stash we created just in case) but that may not be too bad a tradeoff.
If we can sell it as an improved implementation of "-m", we probably can lose some code that the current "-m" implementation uses to do its merge; we'd be instead using the "unstash" code paths.
And the new helper function to detect if switching from one commit to another commit would never conflict can later be used to enhance "git rebase" as well---we could call it N times to rebase a branch with N commits and if all steps are clear, we do not have to insist that there is no local changes like we do currently.
Hmm?
Re: [PATCH v31 0/2] status: add status.compareBranches config for multiple branch comparisons
Good point! I have been running this today, and it gets a bit annoying when it's stashing and unstashing needlessly.
I updated the code!
Harald
Quoted 7 lines · Junio C Hamano
Perhaps doing it this way would make it more worth doing?
- At the beginning of branch switching, ask a new helper function that takes the branch we are switching to as an argument this question:
Quoted 7 lines
Do any paths that are different between the current branch and the branch we are switching to have local (i.e., either in the index or in the working tree) change [Yes/No]?
- When the answer is "yes", save the local changes to a new stash entry, and clear the local changes from the index and from the working tree. If not, do not bother with stash at all.
Can we avoid the extra check and stash if the user passed "--autostash" and unpack_trees() fails because it would overwrite local changes in merge_working_tree()?
Quoted 3 lines
If we can sell it as an improved implementation of "-m", we probably can lose some code that the current "-m" implementation uses to do its merge; we'd be instead using the "unstash" code paths.
That would be nice but I think "git checkout --recurse-submodules -m <branch>" currently updates submodules whereas "git stash" does not know how to recurse submodules.
It would be nice to teach "git stash" to recurse submodules but I don't think it is completly straight forward as we'd need to store the object id of the submodule's stash commit in the parent stash.
Thanks
Phillip
Quoted 12 lines · Phillip Wood
Quoted 11 lines · Junio C Hamano
Perhaps doing it this way would make it more worth doing?
- At the beginning of branch switching, ask a new helper function that takes the branch we are switching to as an argument this question:
Do any paths that are different between the current branch and the branch we are switching to have local (i.e., either in the index or in the working tree) change [Yes/No]?
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
- When the answer is "yes", save the local changes to a new stash entry, and clear the local changes from the index and from the working tree. If not, do not bother with stash at all.
Can we avoid the extra check and stash if the user passed "--autostash" and
unpack_trees()fails because it would overwrite local changes inmerge_working_tree()?
Sorry, but I couldn't quite figure out what you are saying here.
My guess on one part of what it says is that an explicit "--autostash", we should stash without second guessing the user (i.e., avoid chedk and stash). But then the latter part of the sentence "and unpack_trees() fails ..." do not quite parse.
If the user gave "--autostash" and we check with unpack_trees() dry-run and find out that a normal branch switch will be interfered by the local changes, then we would stash, but that check made by a dry-run unpack_trees() is not an "extra" check, so, that does not work as a guess of what you are saying, either.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
If we can sell it as an improved implementation of "-m", we probably can lose some code that the current "-m" implementation uses to do its merge; we'd be instead using the "unstash" code paths.
That would be nice but I think "git checkout --recurse-submodules -m <branch>" currently updates submodules whereas "git stash" does not know how to recurse submodules.
Hmph, I do not do submodules outside what we already have, and I certainly do not do "checkout --recurse-submodules" with or without "-m" with local changes in our submodule.
But does "git stash" even need to know about recursing into submodules for this? When checkout recurses into a submodule, that checkout that is working in the repository of the submodule can handle "-m" itself, which may stash the local changes made in the submodule, no?
Quoted 3 lines
It would be nice to teach "git stash" to recurse submodules but I don't think it is completly straight forward as we'd need to store the object id of the submodule's stash commit in the parent stash.
No, let's not add more commands that take "--recurse-submodules", if we do not have to.
Thanks.
Quoted 29 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 12 lines · Phillip Wood
Quoted 11 lines · Junio C Hamano
Perhaps doing it this way would make it more worth doing?
- At the beginning of branch switching, ask a new helper function that takes the branch we are switching to as an argument this question:
Do any paths that are different between the current branch and the branch we are switching to have local (i.e., either in the index or in the working tree) change [Yes/No]?
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
- When the answer is "yes", save the local changes to a new stash entry, and clear the local changes from the index and from the working tree. If not, do not bother with stash at all.
Can we avoid the extra check and stash if the user passed "--autostash" and
unpack_trees()fails because it would overwrite local changes inmerge_working_tree()?Sorry, but I couldn't quite figure out what you are saying here.
My guess on one part of what it says is that an explicit "--autostash", we should stash without second guessing the user (i.e., avoid chedk and stash). But then the latter part of the sentence "and
unpack_trees()fails ..." do not quite parse.
Quoted 5 lines
If the user gave "--autostash" and we check with
unpack_trees()dry-run and find out that a normal branch switch will be interfered by the local changes, then we would stash, but that check made by a dry-rununpack_trees()is not an "extra" check, so, that does not work as a guess of what you are saying, either.
Why is the dry-run of unpack_trees() not an extra check? I was assuming that it was because we do the dry-run and then do it for real after possibly stashing any local changes. That's why I was wondering if we could avoid the dry-run by creating the stash if the non-dry-run unpack_trees() failed. Looking at the unpack_trees() implementation it can fail for a variety of reasons, only some (one?) of which can be addressed by stashing local changes but there does not seem to be a way for the caller to determine what caused it to fail.
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
If we can sell it as an improved implementation of "-m", we probably can lose some code that the current "-m" implementation uses to do its merge; we'd be instead using the "unstash" code paths.
That would be nice but I think "git checkout --recurse-submodules -m <branch>" currently updates submodules whereas "git stash" does not know how to recurse submodules.
Hmph, I do not do submodules outside what we already have, and I certainly do not do "checkout --recurse-submodules" with or without "-m" with local changes in our submodule.
Quoted 5 lines
But does "git stash" even need to know about recursing into submodules for this? When checkout recurses into a submodule, that checkout that is working in the repository of the submodule can handle "-m" itself, which may stash the local changes made in the submodule, no?
Oh, because this all happens in a single command then yes, I think we can. When I wrote that I'd been thinking about a recent question about rebase not recursing submodules on discord and what it would take to make "git rebase --recurse-submodules --autostash" work. There we need to be able to retrive the stash in a different process to the one that created it so we need some way of tracking the stashed changes in each submodule.
It turns out I'd misremembered what "git checkout -m --recurse-submodules" does at the moment - after testing it, it seems to simply nuke an uncommitted submodule changes rather than merging them.
Thanks
Phillip
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 3 lines
It would be nice to teach "git stash" to recurse submodules but I don't think it is completly straight forward as we'd need to store the object id of the submodule's stash commit in the parent stash.
No, let's not add more commands that take "--recurse-submodules", if we do not have to.
Thanks.
Quoted 5 lines · Phillip Wood
Why is the dry-run of
unpack_trees()not an extra check? I was assuming that it was because we do the dry-run and then do it for real after possibly stashing any local changes. That's why I was wondering if we could avoid the dry-run by creating the stash if the non-dry-rununpack_trees()failed.
Ah, I didn't even think about that possibility.
Try to unpack anyway, and if unpack_trees() branch switching succeeds, we are done. Otherwise, we can trust that unpack_trees() did not do _anything_ to the index or the working tree files, so we can create the stash at that time.
Makes sense.
Quoted 3 lines
It turns out I'd misremembered what "git checkout -m --recurse-submodules" does at the moment - after testing it, it seems to simply nuke an uncommitted submodule changes rather than merging them.
Makes sense.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Why is the dry-run of
unpack_trees()not an extra check? I was assuming that it was because we do the dry-run and then do it for real after possibly stashing any local changes. That's why I was wondering if we could avoid the dry-run by creating the stash if the non-dry-rununpack_trees()failed.
Quoted 8 lines
Ah, I didn't even think about that possibility.
Try to unpack anyway, and if
unpack_trees()branch switching succeeds, we are done. Otherwise, we can trust thatunpack_trees()did not do _anything_ to the index or the working tree files, so we can create the stash at that time.Makes sense.
Interesting idea, and thanks for your help with this! I gave it a shot with this simplification.
It passes the tests, which either means it works, or just that the test coverage is not good enough to detect new issues introduced by me here.
Harald
Hi Junio and Jeff!
Did you get a chance to look at the latest changes?
The scope of this grew a lot from my original idea of auto-stashing, so I'm not 100% convinced that changing '-m' is necessary here. My fear is to break something, especially since 'checkout -m' is a feature I never used before touching it here, so I don't have a good sense of how it should work.
Harald
Quoted 9 lines · Harald Nordgren
Hi Junio and Jeff!
Did you get a chance to look at the latest changes?
The scope of this grew a lot from my original idea of auto-stashing, so I'm not 100% convinced that changing '-m' is necessary here. My fear is to break something, especially since 'checkout -m' is a feature I never used before touching it here, so I don't have a good sense of how it should work.
FWIW, I very much like what I see in
$ git checkout hn/git-checkout-m-with-stash && git diff @{1}output. It is great that we do not have to do any dry-run, because the "real" run safely aborts, we can do the "stash && merge && unstash" dance as a fallback instead. All the credit goes to Phillip and you for the idea and the execution of this.
I do use "checkout -m" a few times a week, but I do not do anything complex with submodules or run the command with unrelated local modifications, so there may be changes in behaviour I haven't seen in corner cases that I do not exercise.
Quoted 9 lines
FWIW, I very much like what I see in
$ git checkout hn/git-checkout-m-with-stash && git diff @{1}output. It is great that we do not have to do any dry-run, because the "real" run safely aborts, we can do the "stash && merge && unstash" dance as a fallback instead. All the credit goes to Phillip and you for the idea and the execution of this.
Quoted 4 lines
I do use "checkout -m" a few times a week, but I do not do anything complex with submodules or run the command with unrelated local modifications, so there may be changes in behaviour I haven't seen in corner cases that I do not exercise.
I wonder if my implementation is not really up to par. I have ran into a few "conflicts", were 'git stash pop' simply worked afterwards.
So not quite production ready.
Harald
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 9 lines
FWIW, I very much like what I see in
$ git checkout hn/git-checkout-m-with-stash && git diff @{1}output. It is great that we do not have to do any dry-run, because the "real" run safely aborts, we can do the "stash && merge && unstash" dance as a fallback instead. All the credit goes to Phillip and you for the idea and the execution of this.
Quoted 4 lines
I do use "checkout -m" a few times a week, but I do not do anything complex with submodules or run the command with unrelated local modifications, so there may be changes in behaviour I haven't seen in corner cases that I do not exercise.
Quoted 4 lines
I wonder if my implementation is not really up to par. I have ran into a few "conflicts", were 'git stash pop' simply worked afterwards.
So not quite production ready.
Update on this: I realized that the issues I ran into was happening because of a sub-shell, so it's resolved by running like this:
export GIT_EXEC_PATH=/Users/Harald/git-repos/github.com/git/git && \
/Users/Harald/git-repos/github.com/git/git/git checkout -m -
So thus, it's not a real problem.
I think this is ready to be reviewed, does anyone have time to take a look?
Harald
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 9 lines
FWIW, I very much like what I see in
$ git checkout hn/git-checkout-m-with-stash && git diff @{1}output. It is great that we do not have to do any dry-run, because the "real" run safely aborts, we can do the "stash && merge && unstash" dance as a fallback instead. All the credit goes to Phillip and you for the idea and the execution of this.
Quoted 4 lines
I do use "checkout -m" a few times a week, but I do not do anything complex with submodules or run the command with unrelated local modifications, so there may be changes in behaviour I haven't seen in corner cases that I do not exercise.
Quoted 4 lines
I wonder if my implementation is not really up to par. I have ran into a few "conflicts", were 'git stash pop' simply worked afterwards.
So not quite production ready.
Update on this: I realized that the issues I ran into was happening because of a sub-shell, so it's resolved by running like this:
export GIT_EXEC_PATH=/Users/Harald/git-repos/github.com/git/git && \
/Users/Harald/git-repos/github.com/git/git/git checkout -m -
So thus, it's not a real problem.
I think this is ready to be reviewed, does anyone have time to take a look?
Harald
Quoted 7 lines · Harald Nordgren
Update on this: I realized that the issues I ran into was happening because of a sub-shell, so it's resolved by running like this:
export GIT_EXEC_PATH=/Users/Harald/git-repos/github.com/git/git && \
/Users/Harald/git-repos/github.com/git/git/git checkout -m -So thus, it's not a real problem.
In other words, you were not consistently trying the version of Git you just built?
Thanks for a good news.
Quoted 1 line
In other words, you were not consistently trying the version of Git
you just built?
I was, but the difference here is the this logic calls another instance of Git halfway through, and I didn't realize until today that that other instance ended up being the system Git instead. So technically, I was only half-using it -- but accident.
Maybe I should consider installing it globally on my machine, via PATH or otherwise!
Harald
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 9 lines
FWIW, I very much like what I see in
$ git checkout hn/git-checkout-m-with-stash && git diff @{1}output. It is great that we do not have to do any dry-run, because the "real" run safely aborts, we can do the "stash && merge && unstash" dance as a fallback instead. All the credit goes to Phillip and you for the idea and the execution of this.
Quoted 4 lines
I do use "checkout -m" a few times a week, but I do not do anything complex with submodules or run the command with unrelated local modifications, so there may be changes in behaviour I haven't seen in corner cases that I do not exercise.
Quoted 4 lines
I wonder if my implementation is not really up to par. I have ran into a few "conflicts", were 'git stash pop' simply worked afterwards.
So not quite production ready.
Update on this: I realized that the issues I ran into was happening because of a sub-shell, so it's resolved by running like this:
export GIT_EXEC_PATH=/Users/Harald/git-repos/github.com/git/git && \
/Users/Harald/git-repos/github.com/git/git/git checkout -m -
So thus, it's not a real problem.
I think this is ready to be reviewed, does anyone have time to take a look?
Harald
PATCH v2 1/1 checkout: add --autostash option for branch switching
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
When switching branches, local modifications in the working tree can prevent the checkout from succeeding. While "git rebase" and "git merge" already support --autostash to handle this case automatically, "git checkout" and "git switch" require users to manually stash and unstash their changes.
Teach "git checkout" and "git switch" to accept --autostash and --no-autostash options that automatically create a temporary stash entry before the branch switch begins and apply it after the switch completes. If the stash application results in conflicts, the stash entry is saved to the stash list so the user can resolve them later.
Also add a checkout.autoStash configuration option that enables this behavior by default, which can be overridden with --no-autostash on the command line.
---
checkout: 'autostash' for branch switching
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-2234%2FHaraldNordgren%2Fcheckout_autostash-v2
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-2234/HaraldNordgren/checkout_autostash-v2
Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/2234
Range-diff vs v1:
1: 12194f6fbe ! 1: be2b697c54 checkout: add --autostash option for branch switching
@@ Documentation/config/checkout.adoc: with a small number of cores, the default se
well the parallel version performs.
+`checkout.autoStash`::
-+ When set to true, automatically create a temporary stash entry
-+ before the operation begins, and apply it after the operation
-+ ends. This means that you can run `git checkout` or `git switch`
-+ on a dirty worktree. However, use with care: the final stash
-+ application after a successful branch switch might result in
-+ non-trivial conflicts.
++ When set to true, enable autostash for `git checkout` and
++ `git switch` branch switching operations. When a branch
++ switch would fail because local changes (in the index or the
++ working tree) overlap with paths that differ between the
++ current and target branch, a temporary stash entry is
++ automatically created before the switch and applied after
++ it completes. If the local changes do not overlap with the
++ branch difference, the switch proceeds normally without
++ stashing.
+ This option can be overridden by the `--no-autostash` and
+ `--autostash` options of linkgit:git-checkout[1] and
+ linkgit:git-switch[1].
@@ Documentation/git-checkout.adoc: When switching branches with `--merge`, staged
+`--autostash`::
+`--no-autostash`::
-+ When switching branches, automatically create a temporary stash
-+ entry before the operation begins, and apply it after the
-+ operation ends. This means that you can switch branches on a
-+ dirty worktree. However, use with care: the final stash
-+ application after a successful branch switch might result in
-+ non-trivial conflicts.
++ When switching branches, if any of the paths that differ
++ between the current branch and the target branch have local
++ changes (in the index or the working tree), automatically
++ create a temporary stash entry before the operation begins,
++ and apply it after the operation ends. If the local changes
++ do not overlap with the branch difference, the switch proceeds
++ without stashing. When a stash entry is created and the
++ subsequent application results in conflicts, the stash entry
++ is saved so that you can use `git stash pop` to recover and
++ `git stash drop` when done. Use with `--force` to always
++ stash local changes regardless of conflicts.
+
`-p`::
`--patch`::
@@ Documentation/git-switch.adoc: should result in deletion of the path).
+`--autostash`::
+`--no-autostash`::
-+ Automatically create a temporary stash entry before the
-+ operation begins, and apply it after the operation ends.
-+ This means that you can switch branches on a dirty worktree.
-+ However, use with care: the final stash application after a
-+ successful branch switch might result in non-trivial
-+ conflicts.
++ When switching branches, if any of the paths that differ
++ between the current branch and the target branch have local
++ changes (in the index or the working tree), automatically
++ create a temporary stash entry before the operation begins,
++ and apply it after the operation ends. If the local changes
++ do not overlap with the branch difference, the switch proceeds
++ without stashing. When a stash entry is created and the
++ subsequent application results in conflicts, the stash entry
++ is saved so that you can use `git stash pop` to recover and
++ `git stash drop` when done. Use with `--force` to always
++ stash local changes regardless of conflicts.
+
`-q`::
`--quiet`::
@@ builtin/checkout.c: struct checkout_opts {
int empty_pathspec_ok;
int checkout_index;
int checkout_worktree;
+@@ builtin/checkout.c: static void orphaned_commit_warning(struct commit *old_commit, struct commit *ne
+ release_revisions(&revs);
+ }
+
++static int checkout_would_clobber_changes(struct branch_info *old_branch_info,
++ struct branch_info *new_branch_info)
++{
++ struct tree_desc trees[2];
++ struct tree *old_tree, *new_tree;
++ struct unpack_trees_options topts;
++ struct index_state tmp_index = INDEX_STATE_INIT(the_repository);
++ const struct object_id *old_commit_oid;
++ int ret;
++
++ if (!new_branch_info->commit)
++ return 0;
++
++ old_commit_oid = old_branch_info->commit ?
++ &old_branch_info->commit->object.oid :
++ the_hash_algo->empty_tree;
++ old_tree = repo_parse_tree_indirect(the_repository, old_commit_oid);
++ if (!old_tree)
++ return 0;
++
++ new_tree = repo_get_commit_tree(the_repository,
++ new_branch_info->commit);
++ if (!new_tree)
++ return 0;
++ if (repo_parse_tree(the_repository, new_tree) < 0)
++ return 0;
++
++ memset(&topts, 0, sizeof(topts));
++ topts.head_idx = -1;
++ topts.src_index = the_repository->index;
++ topts.dst_index = &tmp_index;
++ topts.initial_checkout = is_index_unborn(the_repository->index);
++ topts.merge = 1;
++ topts.update = 1;
++ topts.dry_run = 1;
++ topts.quiet = 1;
++ topts.fn = twoway_merge;
++
++ init_tree_desc(&trees[0], &old_tree->object.oid,
++ old_tree->buffer, old_tree->size);
++ init_tree_desc(&trees[1], &new_tree->object.oid,
++ new_tree->buffer, new_tree->size);
++
++ ret = unpack_trees(2, trees, &topts);
++ discard_index(&tmp_index);
++
++ return ret != 0;
++}
++
+ static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
+ struct branch_info *new_branch_info)
+ {
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
do_merge = 0;
}
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
+ if (opts->autostash) {
+ if (repo_read_index(the_repository) < 0)
+ die(_("index file corrupt"));
-+ create_autostash_ref(the_repository, "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH");
++ if (opts->discard_changes ||
++ checkout_would_clobber_changes(&old_branch_info,
++ new_branch_info))
++ create_autostash_ref(the_repository,
++ "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH");
+ }
+
if (do_merge) {
@@ t/t2061-switch-autostash.sh (new)
+ git checkout main
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'switch --autostash on dirty worktree' '
++test_expect_success 'switch --autostash skips stash when no conflict' '
+ git branch branch1 other-branch &&
+ echo dirty >file0 &&
+ git switch --autostash branch1 >actual 2>&1 &&
-+ test_grep "Created autostash" actual &&
-+ test_grep "Applied autostash" actual &&
++ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
+ echo dirty >expected &&
+ test_cmp expected file0 &&
+ git switch main
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'checkout --autostash on dirty worktree' '
++test_expect_success 'checkout --autostash skips stash when no conflict' '
+ git branch branch2 other-branch &&
+ echo dirty >file0 &&
+ git checkout --autostash branch2 >actual 2>&1 &&
-+ test_grep "Created autostash" actual &&
-+ test_grep "Applied autostash" actual &&
++ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
+ echo dirty >expected &&
+ test_cmp expected file0 &&
+ git checkout main
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'switch: checkout.autostash config' '
++test_expect_success 'switch: checkout.autostash config skips stash when no conflict' '
+ git branch branch3 other-branch &&
+ echo dirty >file0 &&
+ test_config checkout.autostash true &&
+ git switch branch3 >actual 2>&1 &&
-+ test_grep "Created autostash" actual &&
-+ test_grep "Applied autostash" actual &&
++ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
+ echo dirty >expected &&
+ test_cmp expected file0 &&
+ git switch main
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'checkout: checkout.autostash config' '
++test_expect_success 'checkout: checkout.autostash config skips stash when no conflict' '
+ git branch branch4 other-branch &&
+ echo dirty >file0 &&
+ test_config checkout.autostash true &&
+ git checkout branch4 >actual 2>&1 &&
-+ test_grep "Created autostash" actual &&
-+ test_grep "Applied autostash" actual &&
++ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
+ echo dirty >expected &&
+ test_cmp expected file0 &&
+ git checkout main
@@ t/t2061-switch-autostash.sh (new)
+ echo dirty >file0 &&
+ test_config checkout.autostash false &&
+ git switch --autostash branch6 >actual 2>&1 &&
-+ test_grep "Created autostash" actual &&
-+ test_grep "Applied autostash" actual &&
++ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
+ echo dirty >expected &&
+ test_cmp expected file0 &&
+ git switch main
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'autostash with dirty index' '
++test_expect_success 'autostash with non-conflicting dirty index' '
+ git branch branch7 other-branch &&
+ echo dirty-index >file0 &&
+ git add file0 &&
+ git switch --autostash branch7 >actual 2>&1 &&
-+ test_grep "Created autostash" actual &&
-+ test_grep "Applied autostash" actual &&
++ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
+ echo dirty-index >expected &&
+ test_cmp expected file0 &&
+ git checkout -- file0 &&
@@ t/t2061-switch-autostash.sh (new)
+ git switch main
+'
+
-+test_expect_success '--autostash with --merge stashes and switches' '
++test_expect_success '--autostash with --merge skips stash when no conflict' '
+ git branch branch10 other-branch &&
+ echo dirty >file0 &&
+ git switch --autostash --merge branch10 >actual 2>&1 &&
-+ test_grep "Created autostash" actual &&
-+ test_grep "Applied autostash" actual &&
++ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
+ echo dirty >expected &&
+ test_cmp expected file0 &&
+ git switch main
@@ t/t2061-switch-autostash.sh (new)
+ git switch main
+'
+
-+test_expect_success '--autostash with new branch creation' '
++test_expect_success '--autostash with new branch creation skips stash' '
+ echo dirty >file0 &&
+ git switch --autostash -c branch13 >actual 2>&1 &&
-+ test_grep "Created autostash" actual &&
-+ test_grep "Applied autostash" actual &&
++ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
+ echo dirty >expected &&
+ test_cmp expected file0 &&
+ git switch main &&
+ git branch -D branch13
+'
+
++test_expect_success 'autostash with conflicting changes that apply cleanly' '
++ git branch branch14 other-branch &&
++ echo file1other >file1 &&
++ git switch --autostash branch14 >actual 2>&1 &&
++ test_grep "Created autostash" actual &&
++ test_grep "Applied autostash" actual &&
++ echo file1other >expected &&
++ test_cmp expected file1 &&
++ git switch main
++'
++
+test_done
## t/t9902-completion.sh ##Documentation/config/checkout.adoc | 15 +++ Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 14 +++ Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 14 +++ builtin/checkout.c | 69 +++++++++++ t/meson.build | 1 + t/t2061-switch-autostash.sh | 184 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t9902-completion.sh | 1 + 7 files changed, 298 insertions(+) create mode 100755 t/t2061-switch-autostash.sh
Documentation/config/checkout.adoc +15 -0
@@ -36,6 +36,21 @@ with a small number of cores, the default sequential checkout often performs better. The size and compression level of a repository might also influence how well the parallel version performs. +`checkout.autoStash`:: + When set to true, enable autostash for `git checkout` and + `git switch` branch switching operations. When a branch + switch would fail because local changes (in the index or the + working tree) overlap with paths that differ between the + current and target branch, a temporary stash entry is + automatically created before the switch and applied after + it completes. If the local changes do not overlap with the + branch difference, the switch proceeds normally without + stashing. + This option can be overridden by the `--no-autostash` and + `--autostash` options of linkgit:git-checkout[1] and + linkgit:git-switch[1]. + Defaults to false. + `checkout.thresholdForParallelism`:: When running parallel checkout with a small number of files, the cost of subprocess spawning and inter-process communication might outweigh
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +14 -0
@@ -272,6 +272,20 @@ When switching branches with `--merge`, staged changes may be lost. `merge.conflictStyle` configuration variable. Possible values are `merge` (default), `diff3`, and `zdiff3`. +`--autostash`:: +`--no-autostash`:: + When switching branches, if any of the paths that differ + between the current branch and the target branch have local + changes (in the index or the working tree), automatically + create a temporary stash entry before the operation begins, + and apply it after the operation ends. If the local changes + do not overlap with the branch difference, the switch proceeds + without stashing. When a stash entry is created and the + subsequent application results in conflicts, the stash entry + is saved so that you can use `git stash pop` to recover and + `git stash drop` when done. Use with `--force` to always + stash local changes regardless of conflicts. + `-p`:: `--patch`:: Interactively select hunks in the difference between the
Documentation/git-switch.adoc +14 -0
@@ -142,6 +142,20 @@ should result in deletion of the path). `merge.conflictStyle` configuration variable. Possible values are `merge` (default), `diff3`, and `zdiff3`. +`--autostash`:: +`--no-autostash`:: + When switching branches, if any of the paths that differ + between the current branch and the target branch have local + changes (in the index or the working tree), automatically + create a temporary stash entry before the operation begins, + and apply it after the operation ends. If the local changes + do not overlap with the branch difference, the switch proceeds + without stashing. When a stash entry is created and the + subsequent application results in conflicts, the stash entry + is saved so that you can use `git stash pop` to recover and + `git stash drop` when done. Use with `--force` to always + stash local changes regardless of conflicts. + `-q`:: `--quiet`:: Quiet, suppress feedback messages.
builtin/checkout.c +69 -0
114 lines not on this page · raw message
t/meson.build +1 -0
@@ -275,6 +275,7 @@ integration_tests = [ 't2030-unresolve-info.sh', 't2050-git-dir-relative.sh', 't2060-switch.sh', + 't2061-switch-autostash.sh', 't2070-restore.sh', 't2071-restore-patch.sh', 't2072-restore-pathspec-file.sh',
t/t2061-switch-autostash.sh new file +184 -0
184 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t9902-completion.sh +1 -0
@@ -2602,6 +2602,7 @@ test_expect_success 'double dash "git checkout"' ' --ignore-other-worktrees Z --recurse-submodules Z --auto-advance Z + --autostash Z --progress Z --guess Z --no-guess Z
base-commit: 7f19e4e1b6a3ad259e2ed66033e01e03b8b74c5e
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Quoted 14 lines · Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
When switching branches, local modifications in the working tree can prevent the checkout from succeeding. While "git rebase" and "git merge" already support --autostash to handle this case automatically, "git checkout" and "git switch" require users to manually stash and unstash their changes.
Teach "git checkout" and "git switch" to accept --autostash and --no-autostash options that automatically create a temporary stash entry before the branch switch begins and apply it after the switch completes. If the stash application results in conflicts, the stash entry is saved to the stash list so the user can resolve them later.
Quoted 3 lines
Also add a checkout.autoStash configuration option that enables this behavior by default, which can be overridden with --no-autostash on the command line.
With this, shouldn't "-m" become a synonym for "--autostash"? For users of "checkout -m", this is a strictly improved version of the same feature, it seems.
Also, "stash" is merely an implementation detail of how we make the merge safer, so from end-user's point of view, this feature is more like "switch to the other branch, while merging the local changes there", so calling it "--merge" or something may be much better than calling it "--autostash".
Other than that, I like the implementation in general.
Quoted 9 lines
With this, shouldn't "-m" become a synonym for "--autostash"? For users of "checkout -m", this is a strictly improved version of the same feature, it seems.
Also, "stash" is merely an implementation detail of how we make the merge safer, so from end-user's point of view, this feature is more like "switch to the other branch, while merging the local changes there", so calling it "--merge" or something may be much better than calling it "--autostash".
That's an interesting idea and I gave it a shot! I do worry about breaking the existing '-m' flow because I don't understand its fundamentals.
But tests old seem to be passing (well, they did break and then I fixed the code to make them pass again), so that's promising. Although hard for me to say if the old test coverage protects against all possible regressions.
Quoted 1 line
Other than that, I like the implementation in general.
Thanks for all your support, Junio!
Harald
PATCH v3 1/1 checkout: add --autostash option for branch switching
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
When switching branches, local modifications in the working tree can prevent the checkout from succeeding. While "git rebase" and "git merge" already support --autostash to handle this case automatically, "git checkout" and "git switch" require users to manually stash and unstash their changes.
Teach "git checkout" and "git switch" to accept --autostash and --no-autostash options that automatically create a temporary stash entry before the branch switch begins and apply it after the switch completes. If the stash application results in conflicts, the stash entry is saved to the stash list so the user can resolve them later.
Also add a checkout.autoStash configuration option that enables this behavior by default, which can be overridden with --no-autostash on the command line.
---
checkout: 'autostash' for branch switching
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-2234%2FHaraldNordgren%2Fcheckout_autostash-v3
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-2234/HaraldNordgren/checkout_autostash-v3
Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/2234
Range-diff vs v2:
1: be2b697c54 ! 1: 05f1e53163 checkout: add --autostash option for branch switching
@@ Commit message
Signed-off-by: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
- ## Documentation/config/checkout.adoc ##
-@@ Documentation/config/checkout.adoc: with a small number of cores, the default sequential checkout often performs
- better. The size and compression level of a repository might also influence how
- well the parallel version performs.
-
-+`checkout.autoStash`::
-+ When set to true, enable autostash for `git checkout` and
-+ `git switch` branch switching operations. When a branch
-+ switch would fail because local changes (in the index or the
-+ working tree) overlap with paths that differ between the
-+ current and target branch, a temporary stash entry is
-+ automatically created before the switch and applied after
-+ it completes. If the local changes do not overlap with the
-+ branch difference, the switch proceeds normally without
-+ stashing.
-+ This option can be overridden by the `--no-autostash` and
-+ `--autostash` options of linkgit:git-checkout[1] and
-+ linkgit:git-switch[1].
-+ Defaults to false.
-+
- `checkout.thresholdForParallelism`::
- When running parallel checkout with a small number of files, the cost
- of subprocess spawning and inter-process communication might outweigh
-
## Documentation/git-checkout.adoc ##
-@@ Documentation/git-checkout.adoc: When switching branches with `--merge`, staged changes may be lost.
- `merge.conflictStyle` configuration variable. Possible values are
- `merge` (default), `diff3`, and `zdiff3`.
+@@ Documentation/git-checkout.adoc: working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc.
+ are different between the current branch and the branch to
+ which you are switching, the command refuses to switch
+ branches in order to preserve your modifications in context.
+- However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current
+- branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch
+- is done, and you will be on the new branch.
+-+
+-When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting
+-paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts
+-and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge
+-should result in deletion of the path).
++ With this option, the conflicting local changes are
++ automatically stashed before the switch and reapplied
++ afterwards. If the local changes do not overlap with the
++ differences between branches, the switch proceeds without
++ stashing. If reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the
++ entry is saved to the stash list so you can use `git stash
++ pop` to recover and `git stash drop` when done.
+ +
+ When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate
+ the conflicted merge in the specified paths. This option cannot be
+ used when checking out paths from a tree-ish.
+-+
+-When switching branches with `--merge`, staged changes may be lost.
+
+ `--conflict=<style>`::
+ The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
+@@ Documentation/git-checkout.adoc: $ git checkout mytopic
+ error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches.
+ ------------
+
+-You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a
+-three-way merge:
++You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would save the local
++changes in a stash entry and reset the working tree to allow switching:
+
+ ------------
+ $ git checkout -m mytopic
+-Auto-merging frotz
++Created autostash: 7a9afa3
++Applied autostash.
+ ------------
+
+-After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_
++After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_
+ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what
+ changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
+
+ === 3. Merge conflict
+
+-When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with
+-the `-m` option, you would see something like this:
++When the locally modified files overlap with files that need to be
++updated by the branch switch, the changes are stashed and reapplied
++after the switch. If the stash application results in conflicts,
++they are not resolved and the stash is saved to the stash list:
+
+ ------------
+ $ git checkout -m mytopic
+-Auto-merging frotz
+-ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz
+-fatal: merge program failed
++Created autostash: 7a9afa3
++Applying autostash resulted in conflicts.
++Your changes are safe in the stash.
++You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time.
+ ------------
-+`--autostash`::
-+`--no-autostash`::
-+ When switching branches, if any of the paths that differ
-+ between the current branch and the target branch have local
-+ changes (in the index or the working tree), automatically
-+ create a temporary stash entry before the operation begins,
-+ and apply it after the operation ends. If the local changes
-+ do not overlap with the branch difference, the switch proceeds
-+ without stashing. When a stash entry is created and the
-+ subsequent application results in conflicts, the stash entry
-+ is saved so that you can use `git stash pop` to recover and
-+ `git stash drop` when done. Use with `--force` to always
-+ stash local changes regardless of conflicts.
-+
- `-p`::
- `--patch`::
- Interactively select hunks in the difference between the
+-At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in
+-the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted
+-files. Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with
+-`git add` as usual:
+-
+-------------
+-$ edit frotz
+-$ git add frotz
+-------------
++At this point, `git stash pop` can be used to recover and resolve
++the conflicts, and `git stash drop` to discard the stash when done.
+
+ CONFIGURATION
+ -------------
## Documentation/git-switch.adoc ##
-@@ Documentation/git-switch.adoc: should result in deletion of the path).
- `merge.conflictStyle` configuration variable. Possible values are
- `merge` (default), `diff3`, and `zdiff3`.
+@@ Documentation/git-switch.adoc: variable.
+ If you have local modifications to one or more files that are
+ different between the current branch and the branch to which
+ you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in
+- order to preserve your modifications in context. However,
+- with this option, a three-way merge between the current
+- branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch is
+- done, and you will be on the new branch.
+-+
+-When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting
+-paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts
+-and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge
+-should result in deletion of the path).
++ order to preserve your modifications in context. With this
++ option, the conflicting local changes are automatically
++ stashed before the switch and reapplied afterwards. If the
++ local changes do not overlap with the differences between
++ branches, the switch proceeds without stashing. If
++ reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the entry is
++ saved to the stash list so you can use `git stash pop` to
++ recover and `git stash drop` when done.
+
+ `--conflict=<style>`::
+ The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
+@@ Documentation/git-switch.adoc: $ git switch mytopic
+ error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches.
+ ------------
+
+-You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a three-way
+-merge:
++You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would save the local
++changes in a stash entry and reset the working tree to allow switching:
+
+ ------------
+ $ git switch -m mytopic
+-Auto-merging frotz
++Created autostash: 7a9afa3
++Applied autostash.
+ ------------
+
+-After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_
++After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_
+ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what
+ changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
-+`--autostash`::
-+`--no-autostash`::
-+ When switching branches, if any of the paths that differ
-+ between the current branch and the target branch have local
-+ changes (in the index or the working tree), automatically
-+ create a temporary stash entry before the operation begins,
-+ and apply it after the operation ends. If the local changes
-+ do not overlap with the branch difference, the switch proceeds
-+ without stashing. When a stash entry is created and the
-+ subsequent application results in conflicts, the stash entry
-+ is saved so that you can use `git stash pop` to recover and
-+ `git stash drop` when done. Use with `--force` to always
-+ stash local changes regardless of conflicts.
-+
- `-q`::
- `--quiet`::
- Quiet, suppress feedback messages.
## builtin/checkout.c ##
+@@
+ #include "merge-ll.h"
+ #include "lockfile.h"
+ #include "mem-pool.h"
+-#include "merge-ort-wrappers.h"
+ #include "object-file.h"
+ #include "object-name.h"
+ #include "odb.h"
@@
#include "repo-settings.h"
#include "resolve-undo.h"
@@ builtin/checkout.c
#include "setup.h"
#include "submodule.h"
#include "symlinks.h"
-@@ builtin/checkout.c: struct checkout_opts {
- int only_merge_on_switching_branches;
- int can_switch_when_in_progress;
- int orphan_from_empty_tree;
-+ int autostash;
- int empty_pathspec_ok;
- int checkout_index;
- int checkout_worktree;
+@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
+
+ ret = unpack_trees(2, trees, &topts);
+ clear_unpack_trees_porcelain(&topts);
+- if (ret == -1) {
+- /*
+- * Unpack couldn't do a trivial merge; either
+- * give up or do a real merge, depending on
+- * whether the merge flag was used.
+- */
+- struct tree *work;
+- struct tree *old_tree;
+- struct merge_options o;
+- struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
+- struct strbuf old_commit_shortname = STRBUF_INIT;
+-
+- if (!opts->merge)
+- return 1;
+-
+- /*
+- * Without old_branch_info->commit, the below is the same as
+- * the two-tree unpack we already tried and failed.
+- */
+- if (!old_branch_info->commit)
+- return 1;
+- old_tree = repo_get_commit_tree(the_repository,
+- old_branch_info->commit);
+-
+- if (repo_index_has_changes(the_repository, old_tree, &sb))
+- die(_("cannot continue with staged changes in "
+- "the following files:\n%s"), sb.buf);
+- strbuf_release(&sb);
+-
+- /* Do more real merge */
+-
+- /*
+- * We update the index fully, then write the
+- * tree from the index, then merge the new
+- * branch with the current tree, with the old
+- * branch as the base. Then we reset the index
+- * (but not the working tree) to the new
+- * branch, leaving the working tree as the
+- * merged version, but skipping unmerged
+- * entries in the index.
+- */
+-
+- add_files_to_cache(the_repository, NULL, NULL, NULL, 0,
+- 0, 0);
+- init_ui_merge_options(&o, the_repository);
+- o.verbosity = 0;
+- work = write_in_core_index_as_tree(the_repository);
+-
+- ret = reset_tree(new_tree,
+- opts, 1,
+- writeout_error, new_branch_info);
+- if (ret)
+- return ret;
+- o.ancestor = old_branch_info->name;
+- if (!old_branch_info->name) {
+- strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(&old_commit_shortname,
+- &old_branch_info->commit->object.oid,
+- DEFAULT_ABBREV);
+- o.ancestor = old_commit_shortname.buf;
+- }
+- o.branch1 = new_branch_info->name;
+- o.branch2 = "local";
+- o.conflict_style = opts->conflict_style;
+- ret = merge_ort_nonrecursive(&o,
+- new_tree,
+- work,
+- old_tree);
+- if (ret < 0)
+- die(NULL);
+- ret = reset_tree(new_tree,
+- opts, 0,
+- writeout_error, new_branch_info);
+- strbuf_release(&o.obuf);
+- strbuf_release(&old_commit_shortname);
+- if (ret)
+- return ret;
+- }
++ if (ret == -1)
++ return 1;
+ }
+
+ if (!cache_tree_fully_valid(the_repository->index->cache_tree))
+@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
+ if (write_locked_index(the_repository->index, &lock_file, COMMIT_LOCK))
+ die(_("unable to write new index file"));
+
+- if (!opts->discard_changes && !opts->quiet && new_branch_info->commit)
+- show_local_changes(&new_branch_info->commit->object, &opts->diff_options);
+-
+ return 0;
+ }
+
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static void orphaned_commit_warning(struct commit *old_commit, struct commit *ne
release_revisions(&revs);
}
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
do_merge = 0;
}
-+ if (opts->autostash) {
++ if (opts->merge) {
+ if (repo_read_index(the_repository) < 0)
+ die(_("index file corrupt"));
-+ if (opts->discard_changes ||
-+ checkout_would_clobber_changes(&old_branch_info,
++ if (checkout_would_clobber_changes(&old_branch_info,
+ new_branch_info))
+ create_autostash_ref(the_repository,
+ "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH");
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
update_refs_for_switch(opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info);
++ if (opts->conflict_style >= 0) {
++ struct strbuf cfg = STRBUF_INIT;
++ strbuf_addf(&cfg, "merge.conflictStyle=%s",
++ conflict_style_name(opts->conflict_style));
++ git_config_push_parameter(cfg.buf);
++ strbuf_release(&cfg);
++ }
+ apply_autostash_ref(the_repository, "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH");
++
++ discard_index(the_repository->index);
++ if (repo_read_index(the_repository) < 0)
++ die(_("index file corrupt"));
++
++ if (!opts->discard_changes && !opts->quiet && new_branch_info->commit)
++ show_local_changes(&new_branch_info->commit->object,
++ &opts->diff_options);
+
ret = post_checkout_hook(old_branch_info.commit, new_branch_info->commit, 1);
branch_info_release(&old_branch_info);
-@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int git_checkout_config(const char *var, const char *value,
- opts->dwim_new_local_branch = git_config_bool(var, value);
- return 0;
- }
-+ if (!strcmp(var, "checkout.autostash")) {
-+ opts->autostash = git_config_bool(var, value);
-+ return 0;
-+ }
-
- if (starts_with(var, "submodule."))
- return git_default_submodule_config(var, value, NULL);
-@@ builtin/checkout.c: static struct option *add_common_switch_branch_options(
- PARSE_OPT_NOCOMPLETE),
- OPT_BOOL(0, "ignore-other-worktrees", &opts->ignore_other_worktrees,
- N_("do not check if another worktree is using this branch")),
-+ OPT_AUTOSTASH(&opts->autostash),
- OPT_END()
- };
- struct option *newopts = parse_options_concat(prevopts, options);
- ## t/meson.build ##
-@@ t/meson.build: integration_tests = [
- 't2030-unresolve-info.sh',
- 't2050-git-dir-relative.sh',
- 't2060-switch.sh',
-+ 't2061-switch-autostash.sh',
- 't2070-restore.sh',
- 't2071-restore-patch.sh',
- 't2072-restore-pathspec-file.sh',
+ ## sequencer.c ##
+@@ sequencer.c: static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,
+ &oid, null_oid(the_hash_algo), 0, UPDATE_REFS_DIE_ON_ERR);
+ }
+
+- printf(_("Created autostash: %s\n"), buf.buf);
++ fprintf(stderr, _("Created autostash: %s\n"), buf.buf);
+ if (reset_head(r, &ropts) < 0)
+ die(_("could not reset --hard"));
+ discard_index(r->index);
- ## t/t2061-switch-autostash.sh (new) ##
-@@
-+#!/bin/sh
-+
-+test_description='checkout/switch --autostash tests'
-+
-+GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main
-+export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME
-+
-+. ./test-lib.sh
-+
-+test_expect_success 'setup' '
-+ echo file0content >file0 &&
-+ echo file1content >file1 &&
-+ git add . &&
-+ test_tick &&
-+ git commit -m "initial commit" &&
-+ git branch other-branch &&
-+ echo file1main >file1 &&
-+ git add . &&
-+ test_tick &&
-+ git commit -m "modify file1 on main" &&
-+ git checkout other-branch &&
-+ echo file1other >file1 &&
-+ git add . &&
-+ test_tick &&
-+ git commit -m "modify file1 on other-branch" &&
-+ echo file2content >file2 &&
-+ git add . &&
-+ test_tick &&
-+ git commit -m "add file2 on other-branch" &&
-+ git checkout main
+ ## t/t7201-co.sh ##
+@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'format of merge conflict from checkout -m' '
+ test_cmp expect current &&
+
+ cat <<-EOF >expect &&
+- <<<<<<< simple
++ <<<<<<< Updated upstream
+ a
+ c
+ e
+ =======
+ b
+ d
+- >>>>>>> local
++ >>>>>>> Stashed changes
+ EOF
+ test_cmp expect two
+ '
+@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>' '
+ git checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 simple &&
+
+ cat <<-EOF >expect &&
+- <<<<<<< simple
++ <<<<<<< Updated upstream
+ a
+ c
+ e
+- ||||||| main
++ ||||||| Stash base
+ a
+ b
+ c
+@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>' '
+ =======
+ b
+ d
+- >>>>>>> local
++ >>>>>>> Stashed changes
+ EOF
+ test_cmp expect two
+ '
+
++test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=zdiff3 <branch>' '
++ git checkout -f main &&
++ git reset --hard &&
++ git clean -f &&
++
++ fill a b X d e >two &&
++ git checkout --merge --conflict=zdiff3 simple &&
++
++ cat <<-EOF >expect &&
++ a
++ <<<<<<< Updated upstream
++ c
++ ||||||| Stash base
++ b
++ c
++ d
++ =======
++ b
++ X
++ d
++ >>>>>>> Stashed changes
++ e
++ EOF
++ test_cmp expect two
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'switch --autostash skips stash when no conflict' '
-+ git branch branch1 other-branch &&
-+ echo dirty >file0 &&
-+ git switch --autostash branch1 >actual 2>&1 &&
-+ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
-+ echo dirty >expected &&
-+ test_cmp expected file0 &&
-+ git switch main
++test_expect_success 'checkout -m respects merge.conflictStyle config' '
++ git checkout -f main &&
++ git reset --hard &&
++ git clean -f &&
++
++ test_config merge.conflictStyle diff3 &&
++ fill b d >two &&
++ git checkout -m simple &&
++
++ cat <<-EOF >expect &&
++ <<<<<<< Updated upstream
++ a
++ c
++ e
++ ||||||| Stash base
++ a
++ b
++ c
++ d
++ e
++ =======
++ b
++ d
++ >>>>>>> Stashed changes
++ EOF
++ test_cmp expect two
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'checkout --autostash skips stash when no conflict' '
-+ git branch branch2 other-branch &&
-+ echo dirty >file0 &&
-+ git checkout --autostash branch2 >actual 2>&1 &&
-+ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
-+ echo dirty >expected &&
-+ test_cmp expected file0 &&
-+ git checkout main
-+'
++test_expect_success 'checkout -m skips stash when no conflict' '
++ git checkout -f main &&
++ git clean -f &&
+
-+test_expect_success 'switch: checkout.autostash config skips stash when no conflict' '
-+ git branch branch3 other-branch &&
-+ echo dirty >file0 &&
-+ test_config checkout.autostash true &&
-+ git switch branch3 >actual 2>&1 &&
++ fill 0 x y z >same &&
++ git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 &&
+ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
-+ echo dirty >expected &&
-+ test_cmp expected file0 &&
-+ git switch main
++ fill 0 x y z >expect &&
++ test_cmp expect same
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'checkout: checkout.autostash config skips stash when no conflict' '
-+ git branch branch4 other-branch &&
-+ echo dirty >file0 &&
-+ test_config checkout.autostash true &&
-+ git checkout branch4 >actual 2>&1 &&
++test_expect_success 'checkout -m skips stash with non-conflicting dirty index' '
++ git checkout -f main &&
++ git clean -f &&
++
++ fill 0 x y z >same &&
++ git add same &&
++ git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 &&
+ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
-+ echo dirty >expected &&
-+ test_cmp expected file0 &&
-+ git checkout main
++ fill 0 x y z >expect &&
++ test_cmp expect same
+'
+
-+test_expect_success '--no-autostash overrides checkout.autostash' '
-+ git branch branch5 other-branch &&
-+ echo dirty >file1 &&
-+ test_config checkout.autostash true &&
-+ test_must_fail git switch --no-autostash branch5 2>stderr &&
-+ test_grep ! "Created autostash" stderr &&
-+ git checkout -- file1
-+'
++test_expect_success 'checkout -m stashes and applies on conflicting changes' '
++ git checkout -f main &&
++ git clean -f &&
+
-+test_expect_success '--autostash overrides checkout.autostash=false' '
-+ git branch branch6 other-branch &&
-+ echo dirty >file0 &&
-+ test_config checkout.autostash false &&
-+ git switch --autostash branch6 >actual 2>&1 &&
-+ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
-+ echo dirty >expected &&
-+ test_cmp expected file0 &&
-+ git switch main
++ fill 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >one &&
++ git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 &&
++ test_grep "Created autostash" actual &&
++ test_grep "Applied autostash" actual &&
++ fill 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >expect &&
++ test_cmp expect one
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'autostash with non-conflicting dirty index' '
-+ git branch branch7 other-branch &&
-+ echo dirty-index >file0 &&
-+ git add file0 &&
-+ git switch --autostash branch7 >actual 2>&1 &&
-+ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
-+ echo dirty-index >expected &&
-+ test_cmp expected file0 &&
-+ git checkout -- file0 &&
-+ git switch main
++test_expect_success 'checkout -m with mixed staged and unstaged changes' '
++ git checkout -f main &&
++ git clean -f &&
++
++ fill 0 x y z >same &&
++ git add same &&
++ fill 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >one &&
++ git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 &&
++ test_grep "Created autostash" actual &&
++ test_grep "Applied autostash" actual &&
++ fill 0 x y z >expect &&
++ test_cmp expect same &&
++ fill 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >expect &&
++ test_cmp expect one
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'autostash bypasses conflicting local changes' '
-+ git branch branch8 other-branch &&
-+ echo dirty >file1 &&
-+ test_must_fail git switch branch8 2>stderr &&
++test_expect_success 'checkout -m stashes on truly conflicting changes' '
++ git checkout -f main &&
++ git clean -f &&
++
++ fill 1 2 3 4 5 >one &&
++ test_must_fail git checkout side 2>stderr &&
+ test_grep "Your local changes" stderr &&
-+ git switch --autostash branch8 >actual 2>&1 &&
++ git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 &&
+ test_grep "Created autostash" actual &&
+ test_grep "Applying autostash resulted in conflicts" actual &&
+ test_grep "Your changes are safe in the stash" actual &&
+ git stash drop &&
-+ git reset --hard &&
-+ git switch main
++ git reset --hard
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'autostash is a no-op with clean worktree' '
-+ git branch branch9 other-branch &&
-+ git switch --autostash branch9 >actual 2>&1 &&
-+ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
-+ git switch main
-+'
-+
-+test_expect_success '--autostash with --merge skips stash when no conflict' '
-+ git branch branch10 other-branch &&
-+ echo dirty >file0 &&
-+ git switch --autostash --merge branch10 >actual 2>&1 &&
-+ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
-+ echo dirty >expected &&
-+ test_cmp expected file0 &&
-+ git switch main
-+'
++test_expect_success 'checkout -m produces usable stash on conflict' '
++ git checkout -f main &&
++ git clean -f &&
+
-+test_expect_success 'autostash with staged conflicting changes' '
-+ git branch branch11 other-branch &&
-+ echo staged-change >file1 &&
-+ git add file1 &&
-+ git switch --autostash branch11 >actual 2>&1 &&
-+ test_grep "Created autostash" actual &&
-+ test_grep "Applying autostash resulted in conflicts" actual &&
++ fill 1 2 3 4 5 >one &&
++ git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 &&
+ test_grep "Your changes are safe in the stash" actual &&
-+ git stash drop &&
-+ git reset --hard &&
-+ git switch main
++ git checkout -f main &&
++ git stash pop &&
++ fill 1 2 3 4 5 >expect &&
++ test_cmp expect one
+'
+
-+test_expect_success '--autostash with --force preserves dirty changes' '
-+ git branch branch12 other-branch &&
-+ echo dirty-force >file1 &&
-+ git switch --autostash --force branch12 >actual 2>&1 &&
++test_expect_success 'checkout -m stashes on staged conflicting changes' '
++ git checkout -f main &&
++ git clean -f &&
++
++ fill 1 2 3 4 5 >one &&
++ git add one &&
++ git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 &&
+ test_grep "Created autostash" actual &&
+ test_grep "Applying autostash resulted in conflicts" actual &&
+ test_grep "Your changes are safe in the stash" actual &&
+ git stash drop &&
-+ git reset --hard &&
-+ git switch main
++ git reset --hard
+'
+
-+test_expect_success '--autostash with new branch creation skips stash' '
-+ echo dirty >file0 &&
-+ git switch --autostash -c branch13 >actual 2>&1 &&
++test_expect_success 'checkout -m -b skips stash with dirty tree' '
++ git checkout -f main &&
++ git clean -f &&
++
++ fill 0 x y z >same &&
++ git checkout -m -b newbranch >actual 2>&1 &&
+ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
-+ echo dirty >expected &&
-+ test_cmp expected file0 &&
-+ git switch main &&
-+ git branch -D branch13
++ fill 0 x y z >expect &&
++ test_cmp expect same &&
++ git checkout main &&
++ git branch -D newbranch
+'
+
-+test_expect_success 'autostash with conflicting changes that apply cleanly' '
-+ git branch branch14 other-branch &&
-+ echo file1other >file1 &&
-+ git switch --autostash branch14 >actual 2>&1 &&
-+ test_grep "Created autostash" actual &&
-+ test_grep "Applied autostash" actual &&
-+ echo file1other >expected &&
-+ test_cmp expected file1 &&
-+ git switch main
-+'
+ test_expect_success 'switch to another branch while carrying a deletion' '
+ git checkout -f main &&
+ git reset --hard &&
+
+ ## xdiff-interface.c ##
+@@ xdiff-interface.c: int parse_conflict_style_name(const char *value)
+ return -1;
+ }
+
++const char *conflict_style_name(int style)
++{
++ switch (style) {
++ case XDL_MERGE_DIFF3:
++ return "diff3";
++ case XDL_MERGE_ZEALOUS_DIFF3:
++ return "zdiff3";
++ default:
++ return "merge";
++ }
++}
+
-+test_done
+ int git_xmerge_style = -1;
+
+ int git_xmerge_config(const char *var, const char *value,
- ## t/t9902-completion.sh ##
-@@ t/t9902-completion.sh: test_expect_success 'double dash "git checkout"' '
- --ignore-other-worktrees Z
- --recurse-submodules Z
- --auto-advance Z
-+ --autostash Z
- --progress Z
- --guess Z
- --no-guess Z
+ ## xdiff-interface.h ##
+@@ xdiff-interface.h: void xdiff_set_find_func(xdemitconf_t *xecfg, const char *line, int cflags);
+ void xdiff_clear_find_func(xdemitconf_t *xecfg);
+ struct config_context;
+ int parse_conflict_style_name(const char *value);
++const char *conflict_style_name(int style);
+ int git_xmerge_config(const char *var, const char *value,
+ const struct config_context *ctx, void *cb);
+ extern int git_xmerge_style;Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 50 +++++----- Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 26 ++--- builtin/checkout.c | 160 +++++++++++++++--------------- sequencer.c | 2 +- t/t7201-co.sh | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- xdiff-interface.c | 12 +++ xdiff-interface.h | 1 + 7 files changed, 293 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +22 -28
@@ -251,20 +251,17 @@ working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc. are different between the current branch and the branch to which you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in order to preserve your modifications in context. - However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current - branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch - is done, and you will be on the new branch. -+ -When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting -paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge -should result in deletion of the path). + With this option, the conflicting local changes are + automatically stashed before the switch and reapplied + afterwards. If the local changes do not overlap with the + differences between branches, the switch proceeds without + stashing. If reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the + entry is saved to the stash list so you can use `git stash + pop` to recover and `git stash drop` when done. + When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate the conflicted merge in the specified paths. This option cannot be used when checking out paths from a tree-ish. -+ -When switching branches with `--merge`, staged changes may be lost. `--conflict=<style>`:: The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
@@ -578,39 +575,36 @@ $ git checkout mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a -three-way merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would save the local +changes in a stash entry and reset the working tree to allow switching: ------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Created autostash: 7a9afa3 +Applied autostash. ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch. === 3. Merge conflict -When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with -the `-m` option, you would see something like this: +When the locally modified files overlap with files that need to be +updated by the branch switch, the changes are stashed and reapplied +after the switch. If the stash application results in conflicts, +they are not resolved and the stash is saved to the stash list: ------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz -ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz -fatal: merge program failed +Created autostash: 7a9afa3 +Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. +Your changes are safe in the stash. +You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. ------------ -At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in -the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted -files. Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with -`git add` as usual: - ------------- -$ edit frotz -$ git add frotz ------------- +At this point, `git stash pop` can be used to recover and resolve +the conflicts, and `git stash drop` to discard the stash when done. CONFIGURATION -------------
Documentation/git-switch.adoc +13 -13
@@ -126,15 +126,14 @@ variable. If you have local modifications to one or more files that are different between the current branch and the branch to which you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in - order to preserve your modifications in context. However, - with this option, a three-way merge between the current - branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch is - done, and you will be on the new branch. -+ -When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting -paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge -should result in deletion of the path). + order to preserve your modifications in context. With this + option, the conflicting local changes are automatically + stashed before the switch and reapplied afterwards. If the + local changes do not overlap with the differences between + branches, the switch proceeds without stashing. If + reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the entry is + saved to the stash list so you can use `git stash pop` to + recover and `git stash drop` when done. `--conflict=<style>`:: The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
@@ -217,15 +216,16 @@ $ git switch mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a three-way -merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would save the local +changes in a stash entry and reset the working tree to allow switching: ------------ $ git switch -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Created autostash: 7a9afa3 +Applied autostash. ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
builtin/checkout.c +79 -81
205 lines not on this page · raw message
sequencer.c +1 -1
@@ -4677,7 +4677,7 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r, &oid, null_oid(the_hash_algo), 0, UPDATE_REFS_DIE_ON_ERR); } -printf (_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf); +fprintf (stderr,_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf);if (reset_head (r, &ropts) <0 )die (_ ("could not reset --hard" ));discard_index (r->index);
t/t7201-co.sh +165 -5
201 lines not on this page · raw message
xdiff-interface.c +12 -0
@@ -325,6 +325,18 @@ int parse_conflict_style_name(const char *value)return -1 ; } +const char *conflict_style_name (int style) +{ +switch (style) { +case XDL_MERGE_DIFF3 : +return "diff3" ; +case XDL_MERGE_ZEALOUS_DIFF3 : +return "zdiff3" ; +default : +return "merge" ; + } +} +int git_xmerge_style =-1 ; int git_xmerge_config(const char *var, const char *value,
xdiff-interface.h +1 -0
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ void xdiff_set_find_func(xdemitconf_t *xecfg, const char *line, int cflags);void xdiff_clear_find_func (xdemitconf_t *xecfg);struct config_context ;int parse_conflict_style_name (const char *value); +const char *conflict_style_name (int style);int git_xmerge_config (const char *var,const char *value,const struct config_context *ctx,void *cb);extern int git_xmerge_style;
base-commit: 67006b9db8b772423ad0706029286096307d2567
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Quoted 14 lines · Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
When switching branches, local modifications in the working tree can prevent the checkout from succeeding. While "git rebase" and "git merge" already support --autostash to handle this case automatically, "git checkout" and "git switch" require users to manually stash and unstash their changes.
Teach "git checkout" and "git switch" to accept --autostash and --no-autostash options that automatically create a temporary stash entry before the branch switch begins and apply it after the switch completes. If the stash application results in conflicts, the stash entry is saved to the stash list so the user can resolve them later.
Quoted 7 lines
Also add a checkout.autoStash configuration option that enables this behavior by default, which can be overridden with --no-autostash on the command line.
Signed-off-by Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>---
checkout: 'autostash' for branch switching
Almost all of the above is now stale, as we no longer call this the "autostash" feature. It turned into a project to vastly improve the "checkout --merge" option, so the proposed log message needs to be revamped to match.
Using the autostash mechanism to simplify checkout.c is a great direction, I think, provided we can maintain the high-quality conflict information (branch labels) that users expect from '-m'.
For a new iteration that invalidates almost everything from the previous round, it is easier if range-diff were omitted from the reviewers' point of view (I am not a GGG user, so I do not know if there is such an option to do so). It is not a huge deal as we can simply ignore the large block of lines as irrelevant ;-)
Quoted 14 lines
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 50 +++++----- Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 26 ++--- builtin/checkout.c | 160 +++++++++++++++--------------- sequencer.c | 2 +- t/t7201-co.sh | 170 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- xdiff-interface.c | 12 +++ xdiff-interface.h | 1 + 7 files changed, 293 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-)Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +0
-0
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc. · line 260
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +7
-0@@ -251,20 +251,17 @@ working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc. are different between the current branch and the branch to which you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in order to preserve your modifications in context. + With this option, the conflicting local changes are + automatically stashed before the switch and reapplied + afterwards. If the local changes do not overlap with the + differences between branches, the switch proceeds without + stashing. If reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the + entry is saved to the stash list so you can use `git stash + pop` to recover and `git stash drop` when done.
Great.
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc. · line 255
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +0
-2-+ -When switching branches with `--merge`, staged changes may be lost.
Hmph, I have to admit that I never do "checkout" to go to a different branch with a dirty index that does not match the current HEAD, with or without "--merge"; in fact, not just "I never do" myself, I never thought about what happens when somebody does so, so I do not offhand know what the current code without this patch does, or what the updated code would. In "stash && switch && unstash" flow, the last "unstash" is what decides if the original changes in the index is reapplied to the index or not, IIRC, so we still may lose the distinction between what has been and what has not been added to the index after all, depending on the way how the new code does the "unstash" step.
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +2
-2@@ -578,39 +575,36 @@ $ git checkout mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a -three-way merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would save the local +changes in a stash entry and reset the working tree to allow switching: ------------
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc $ git checkout mytopic · line 589
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +3
-2$ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Created autostash: 7a9afa3 +Applied autostash. ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
OK.
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc $ git checkout mytopic · line 595
Quoted 7 lines
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +3
-2=== 3. Merge conflict -When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with -the `-m` option, you would see something like this: +When the locally modified files overlap with files that need to be +updated by the branch switch, the changes are stashed and reapplied +after the switch. If the stash application results in conflicts,
In the original text of this third example (and as I understand, these examples are written to be read more-or-less independently), the -m option was explicitly mentioned to make it clear that this "conflict" situation is relevant only when the option is used. In the updated text, it is not. We should mention -m somewhere in the updated text as well: When the --merge (-m) option is in effect, _this_ happens.
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc $ git checkout mytopic · line 604
Quoted 12 lines
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +5
-3+they are not resolved and the stash is saved to the stash list: ------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz -ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz -fatal: merge program failed +Created autostash: 7a9afa3 +Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. +Your changes are safe in the stash. +You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. ------------
Nice. It may probably be on a bit too verbose side, though. The fact we are creating a stash entry or the object name of it is not interesting to the user unless there is a conflict, so I would have thought we would not say "Created autostash" at all, and the last three lines would be replaced with something like the following and shown _only_ when the application of the stashed changes did not succeed cleanly:
Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry forward your local changes resulted in conflicts:
- You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop".
- Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to recover your local changes.
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc $ git checkout mytopic · line 613
Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +0
-9-At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in -the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted -files. Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with -`git add` as usual: - ------------- -$ edit frotz -$ git add frotz -------------
After resolving and adding, they need to do "git stash drop" it, but other than that, this part of the example is still valid, isn't it?
The improvement this patch brings in is that the user now has another choice, i.e.,
Instead of editing and resolving the conflicts right now, you can clear the slate with git reset --hard and resurrect the local changes, safely stored in the stash at your leisure, with git stash pop.
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc $ git checkout mytopic · line 607
Quoted 2 lines
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +2
-0+At this point, `git stash pop` can be used to recover and resolve +the conflicts, and `git stash drop` to discard the stash when done.
This is not giving a wrong instruction per-se, but my suggestion above can be used to extend it if we wanted to. It may make it easier to understand to the readers, or it may make it way too verbose. I dunno.
Quoted 25 lines
builtin/checkout.c +1
-2@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@#include "merge-ll.h" #include "lockfile.h" #include "mem-pool.h" -#include "merge-ort-wrappers.h" #include "object-file.h" #include "object-name.h" #include "odb.h" @@ -30,6 +29,7 @@#include "repo-settings.h" #include "resolve-undo.h" #include "revision.h" +#include "sequencer.h" #include "setup.h" #include "submodule.h" #include "symlinks.h" @@ -845,83 +845,8 @@ static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *opts, ret =unpack_trees (2 , trees, &topts);clear_unpack_trees_porcelain (&topts); -if (ret ==-1 ) {
builtin/checkout.c static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *opts, · line 850
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/checkout.c +2
-7-/* -* Unpack couldn't do a trivial merge; either -* give up or do a real merge, depending on -* whether the merge flag was used. -*/ -... - } +if (ret ==-1 ) +return 1 ; }
So pleased to see so much custom code getting removed ;-).
sequencer.c static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r, · line 4683
Quoted 13 lines
sequencer.c +1
-1@@ -4677,7 +4677,7 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r, &oid, null_oid(the_hash_algo), 0, UPDATE_REFS_DIE_ON_ERR); } -printf (_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf); +fprintf (stderr,_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf);if (reset_head (r, &ropts) <0 )die (_ ("could not reset --hard" ));discard_index (r->index);
Is this change something all the callers that passes control through this part desire? Don't some of them want the output go to the standard output, not standard error?
If we are going in the direction I suggested above (i.e., be silent about our use of stashes before it becomes relevant to the user), this part may have to become a conditional
if (!silent)
printf(_("Created autostash: %s\n"), buf.buf);or something, where all the current callers before the "checkout --merge" adds a new caller would pass silent==0 to.
Whatever changes this function needs, it looks more like a separate preparatory patch to me.
Quoted 11 lines
t/t7201-co.sh +1
-1@@ -171,14 +171,14 @@ test_expect_success 'format of merge conflict from checkout -m' ' test_cmp expect current && cat <<-EOF >expect && - <<<<<<< simple + <<<<<<< Updated upstream a
t/t7201-co.sh test_expect_success 'format of merge conflict from checkout -m' ' · line 184
Quoted 10 lines
t/t7201-co.sh +1
-1c e ======= b d - >>>>>>> local + >>>>>>> Stashed changes EOF test_cmp expect two '
Historically, 'git checkout -m' provided the branch names (e.g., "<<<<<<< simple"), which is very helpful context. It would be great if we could find a way to pass the branch names through as labels to the stash application. It may require a preparatory change to "git stash apply" to allow customizing the labels---the underlying machinery at the lowest level does have ability to use labels the callers want it to use, so it may be just the matter of plumbing it through the callchain. I didn't check.
Quoted 28 lines
xdiff-interface.c +12
-0@@ -325,6 +325,18 @@ int parse_conflict_style_name(const char *value)return -1 ; } +const char *conflict_style_name (int style) +{ +switch (style) { +case XDL_MERGE_DIFF3 : +return "diff3" ; +case XDL_MERGE_ZEALOUS_DIFF3 : +return "zdiff3" ; +default : +return "merge" ; + } +} +int git_xmerge_style =-1 ; int git_xmerge_config(const char *var, const char *value,xdiff-interface.h +0
-0
xdiff-interface.h void xdiff_set_find_func(xdemitconf_t *xecfg, const char *line, int cflags); · line 61
Quoted 7 lines
xdiff-interface.h +1
-0@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ void xdiff_set_find_func(xdemitconf_t *xecfg, const char *line, int cflags);void xdiff_clear_find_func (xdemitconf_t *xecfg);struct config_context ;int parse_conflict_style_name (const char *value); +const char *conflict_style_name (int style);int git_xmerge_config (const char *var,const char *value,const struct config_context *ctx,void *cb);extern int git_xmerge_style;
This may be a useful addition, but it would probably need to become a separate preparatory patch, possibly with its own test.
Quoted 4 lines
Almost all of the above is now stale, as we no longer call this the "autostash" feature. It turned into a project to vastly improve the "checkout --merge" option, so the proposed log message needs to be revamped to match.
My feeling is that this feature will drift far away from what I initially needed. I have never used 'checkout -m' but stash->checkout-unstash is a pattern I use a lot.
I wonder with how complicated this might turn out, if it would be better to have this as a separate feature called autostash (mirroring the same feature from git pull rebase which I have enabled).
Harald
Quoted 8 lines · Harald Nordgren
Quoted 4 lines
Almost all of the above is now stale, as we no longer call this the "autostash" feature. It turned into a project to vastly improve the "checkout --merge" option, so the proposed log message needs to be revamped to match.
My feeling is that this feature will drift far away from what I initially needed. I have never used 'checkout -m' but stash->checkout-unstash is a pattern I use a lot.
Perhaps. But things like "checkout --autostash", which can entirely be done by the end user via a wrapper script or an alias, is not interesting enough from my point of view.
PATCH v4 1/1 checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
When switching branches with "git checkout -m", local modifications can block the switch. Teach the -m flow to create a temporary stash before switching and reapply it after. On success, only "Applied autostash." is shown. If reapplying causes conflicts, the stash is kept and the user is told they can resolve and run "git stash drop", or run "git reset --hard" and later "git stash pop" to recover their changes.
---
checkout: 'autostash' for branch switching
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-2234%2FHaraldNordgren%2Fcheckout_autostash-v4
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-2234/HaraldNordgren/checkout_autostash-v4
Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/2234
Range-diff vs v3:
1: 05f1e53163 ! 1: 5d49c0031a checkout: add --autostash option for branch switching
@@ Metadata
Author: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
## Commit message ##
- checkout: add --autostash option for branch switching
+ checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
- When switching branches, local modifications in the working tree can
- prevent the checkout from succeeding. While "git rebase" and "git
- merge" already support --autostash to handle this case automatically,
- "git checkout" and "git switch" require users to manually stash and
- unstash their changes.
-
- Teach "git checkout" and "git switch" to accept --autostash and
- --no-autostash options that automatically create a temporary stash
- entry before the branch switch begins and apply it after the switch
- completes. If the stash application results in conflicts, the stash
- entry is saved to the stash list so the user can resolve them later.
-
- Also add a checkout.autoStash configuration option that enables this
- behavior by default, which can be overridden with --no-autostash on
- the command line.
+ When switching branches with "git checkout -m", local modifications
+ can block the switch. Teach the -m flow to create a temporary stash
+ before switching and reapply it after. On success, only "Applied
+ autostash." is shown. If reapplying causes conflicts, the stash is
+ kept and the user is told they can resolve and run "git stash drop",
+ or run "git reset --hard" and later "git stash pop" to recover their
+ changes.
@@ Documentation/git-checkout.adoc: $ git checkout mytopic
------------
$ git checkout -m mytopic
-Auto-merging frotz
-+Created autostash: 7a9afa3
+Applied autostash.
------------
@@ Documentation/git-checkout.adoc: $ git checkout mytopic
-When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with -the -m option, you would see something like this:
-+When the locally modified files overlap with files that need to be -+updated by the branch switch, the changes are stashed and reapplied -+after the switch. If the stash application results in conflicts, -+they are not resolved and the stash is saved to the stash list:
++When the --merge (-m) option is in effect and the locally ++modified files overlap with files that need to be updated by the ++branch switch, the changes are stashed and reapplied after the ++switch. If the stash application results in conflicts, they are not ++resolved and the stash is saved to the stash list:
------------
$ git checkout -m mytopic
-Auto-merging frotz
-ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz
-fatal: merge program failed
-+Created autostash: 7a9afa3
-+Applying autostash resulted in conflicts.
-+Your changes are safe in the stash.
-+You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time.
- ------------
+-------------
++Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry ++forward your local changes resulted in conflicts:
-At this point, git diff shows the changes cleanly merged as in -the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted -files. Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with -git add as usual:
--
--------------
++ - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them
++ successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop".
+
++ - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want
++ to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to
++ recover your local changes.
+ ------------
-$ edit frotz
-$ git add frotz
-------------
-+At this point, git stash pop can be used to recover and resolve -+the conflicts, and git stash drop to discard the stash when done. ++
++You can try resolving the conflicts now. Edit the conflicting files ++and mark them resolved with git add as usual, then run git stash ++drop to discard the stash entry. Alternatively, you can clear the ++working tree with git reset --hard and recover your local changes ++later with git stash pop.
CONFIGURATION
-------------
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static void orphaned_commit_warning(struct commit *old_commi
static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
struct branch_info *new_branch_info)
{
+@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
+ struct object_id rev;
+ int flag, writeout_error = 0;
+ int do_merge = 1;
++ struct strbuf old_commit_shortname = STRBUF_INIT;
++ const char *stash_label_ancestor = NULL;
+
+ trace2_cmd_mode("branch");
+
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
do_merge = 0;
}
++ if (old_branch_info.name)
++ stash_label_ancestor = old_branch_info.name;
++ else if (old_branch_info.commit) {
++ strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(&old_commit_shortname,
++ &old_branch_info.commit->object.oid,
++ DEFAULT_ABBREV);
++ stash_label_ancestor = old_commit_shortname.buf;
++ }
++
+ if (opts->merge) {
+ if (repo_read_index(the_repository) < 0)
+ die(_("index file corrupt"));
+ if (checkout_would_clobber_changes(&old_branch_info,
+ new_branch_info))
-+ create_autostash_ref(the_repository,
-+ "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH");
++ create_autostash_ref_silent(the_repository,
++ "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH");
+ }
+
if (do_merge) {
ret = merge_working_tree(opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info, &writeout_error); if (ret) {
-+ apply_autostash_ref(the_repository, "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH");
++ apply_autostash_ref_with_labels(the_repository,
++ "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH",
++ new_branch_info->name,
++ "local",
++ stash_label_ancestor);
branch_info_release(&old_branch_info);
++ strbuf_release(&old_commit_shortname);
return ret;
}
+ }
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
update_refs_for_switch(opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info);
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
+ git_config_push_parameter(cfg.buf);
+ strbuf_release(&cfg);
+ }
-+ apply_autostash_ref(the_repository, "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH");
++ apply_autostash_ref_with_labels(the_repository, "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH",
++ new_branch_info->name, "local",
++ stash_label_ancestor);
+
+ discard_index(the_repository->index);
+ if (repo_read_index(the_repository) < 0)
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
+
ret = post_checkout_hook(old_branch_info.commit, new_branch_info->commit, 1); branch_info_release(&old_branch_info);
++ strbuf_release(&old_commit_shortname);
+
+ return ret || writeout_error;
+ }
+
+ ## builtin/stash.c ##
+@@ builtin/stash.c: static void unstage_changes_unless_new(struct object_id *orig_tree)
+ die(_("could not write index"));
+ }
+
+-static int do_apply_stash(const char *prefix, struct stash_info *info,
+- int index, int quiet)
++static int do_apply_stash_with_labels(const char *prefix,
++ struct stash_info *info,
++ int index, int quiet,
++ const char *label1, const char *label2,
++ const char *label_ancestor)
+ {
+ int clean, ret;
+ int has_index = index;
+@@ builtin/stash.c: static int do_apply_stash(const char *prefix, struct stash_info *info,
+ init_ui_merge_options(&o, the_repository);
+
+- o.branch1 = "Updated upstream";
+- o.branch2 = "Stashed changes";
+- o.ancestor = "Stash base";
++ o.branch1 = label1 ? label1 : "Updated upstream";
++ o.branch2 = label2 ? label2 : "Stashed changes";
++ o.ancestor = label_ancestor ? label_ancestor : "Stash base";
+
+ if (oideq(&info->b_tree, &c_tree))
+ o.branch1 = "Version stash was based on";
+@@ builtin/stash.c: restore_untracked:
+ return ret;
+ }
+
++static int do_apply_stash(const char *prefix, struct stash_info *info,
++ int index, int quiet)
++{
++ return do_apply_stash_with_labels(prefix, info, index, quiet,
++ NULL, NULL, NULL);
++}
++
+ static int apply_stash(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,
+ struct repository *repo UNUSED)
+ {
+ int ret = -1;
+ int quiet = 0;
+ int index = use_index;
++ const char *label1 = NULL, *label2 = NULL, *label_ancestor = NULL;
+ struct stash_info info = STASH_INFO_INIT;
+ struct option options[] = {
+ OPT__QUIET(&quiet, N_("be quiet, only report errors")),
+ OPT_BOOL(0, "index", &index,
+ N_("attempt to recreate the index")),
++ OPT_STRING(0, "ours-label", &label1, N_("label"),
++ N_("label for the upstream side in conflict markers")),
++ OPT_STRING(0, "theirs-label", &label2, N_("label"),
++ N_("label for the stashed side in conflict markers")),
++ OPT_STRING(0, "base-label", &label_ancestor, N_("label"),
++ N_("label for the base in diff3 conflict markers")),
+ OPT_END()
+ };
+
+@@ builtin/stash.c: static int apply_stash(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,
+ if (get_stash_info(&info, argc, argv))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+- ret = do_apply_stash(prefix, &info, index, quiet);
++ ret = do_apply_stash_with_labels(prefix, &info, index, quiet,
++ label1, label2, label_ancestor);
+ cleanup:
+ free_stash_info(&info);
+ return ret;
## sequencer.c ##
+@@ sequencer.c: static enum todo_command peek_command(struct todo_list *todo_list, int offset) +
+ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,
+ const char *path,
+- const char *refname)
++ const char *refname,
++ int silent)
+ {
+ struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
+ struct lock_file lock_file = LOCK_INIT;
@@ sequencer.c: static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,
&oid, null_oid(the_hash_algo), 0, UPDATE_REFS_DIE_ON_ERR);
}
- printf(_("Created autostash: %s\n"), buf.buf);
-+ fprintf(stderr, _("Created autostash: %s\n"), buf.buf);
++ if (!silent)
++ fprintf(stderr, _("Created autostash: %s\n"), buf.buf);
if (reset_head(r, &ropts) < 0)
die(_("could not reset --hard"));
discard_index(r->index);
+@@ sequencer.c: static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,
+
+ void create_autostash(struct repository *r, const char *path)
+ {
+- create_autostash_internal(r, path, NULL);
++ create_autostash_internal(r, path, NULL, 0);
+ }
+
+ void create_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
+ {
+- create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname);
++ create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, 0);
+ }
+
+-static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply) ++void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname) ++{
++ create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, 1);
++}
++
++static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply,
++ const char *label1, const char *label2,
++ const char *label_ancestor)
+ {
+ struct child_process child = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
+ int ret = 0;
+@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply)
+ child.no_stderr = 1;
+ strvec_push(&child.args, "stash");
+ strvec_push(&child.args, "apply");
++ if (label1)
++ strvec_pushf(&child.args, "--ours-label=%s", label1);
++ if (label2)
++ strvec_pushf(&child.args, "--theirs-label=%s", label2);
++ if (label_ancestor)
++ strvec_pushf(&child.args, "--base-label=%s", label_ancestor);
+ strvec_push(&child.args, stash_oid);
+ ret = run_command(&child);
+ }
+@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply)
+ strvec_push(&store.args, stash_oid);
+ if (run_command(&store))
+ ret = error(_("cannot store %s"), stash_oid);
++ else if (attempt_apply)
++ fprintf(stderr,
++ _("Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry\n"
++ "forward your local changes resulted in conflicts:\n"
++ "\n"
++ " - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them\n"
++ " successfully, discard the stash entry with \"git stash drop\".\n"
++ "\n"
++ " - Alternatively you can \"git reset --hard\" if you do not want\n"
++ " to deal with them right now, and later \"git stash pop\" to\n"
++ " recover your local changes.\n"));
+ else
+ fprintf(stderr,
+- _("%s\n"
++ _("Autostash exists; creating a new stash entry.\n"
+ "Your changes are safe in the stash.\n"
+ "You can run \"git stash pop\" or"
+- " \"git stash drop\" at any time.\n"),
+- attempt_apply ?
+- _("Applying autostash resulted in conflicts.") :
+- _("Autostash exists; creating a new stash entry."));
++ " \"git stash drop\" at any time.\n"));
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash(const char *path, int attempt_apply)
+ }
+ strbuf_trim(&stash_oid);
+
+- ret = apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply);
++ ret = apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply,
++ NULL, NULL, NULL);
+
+ unlink(path);
+ strbuf_release(&stash_oid);
+@@ sequencer.c: int apply_autostash(const char *path)
+
+ int apply_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid)
+ {
+- return apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid, 1);
++ return apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+ }
+
+ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
+- int attempt_apply)
++ int attempt_apply,
++ const char *label1, const char *label2,
++ const char *label_ancestor)
+ {
+ struct object_id stash_oid;
+ char stash_oid_hex[GIT_MAX_HEXSZ + 1];
+@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
+ return error(_("autostash reference is a symref"));
+
+ oid_to_hex_r(stash_oid_hex, &stash_oid);
+- ret = apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply);
++ ret = apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply,
++ label1, label2, label_ancestor);
+
+ refs_delete_ref(get_main_ref_store(r), "", refname,
+ &stash_oid, REF_NO_DEREF);
+@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname, +
+ int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
+ {
+- return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 0);
++ return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+ }
+
+ int apply_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
+ {
+- return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 1);
++ return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL);
++}
++
++int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
++ const char *label1, const char *label2,
++ const char *label_ancestor)
++{
++ return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 1,
++ label1, label2, label_ancestor);
+ }
+
+ static int checkout_onto(struct repository *r, struct replay_opts *opts,
- ## t/t7201-co.sh ##
-@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'format of merge conflict from checkout -m' '
- test_cmp expect current &&
-
- cat <<-EOF >expect &&
-- <<<<<<< simple
-+ <<<<<<< Updated upstream
- a
- c
- e
- =======
- b
- d
-- >>>>>>> local
-+ >>>>>>> Stashed changes
+ ## sequencer.h ##
+@@ sequencer.h: void commit_post_rewrite(struct repository *r,
+
+ void create_autostash(struct repository *r, const char *path);
+ void create_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname); ++void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname);
+ int save_autostash(const char *path);
+ int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);
+ int apply_autostash(const char *path);
+ int apply_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid);
+ int apply_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname); ++int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
++ const char *label1, const char *label2,
++ const char *label_ancestor);
+
+ #define SUMMARY_INITIAL_COMMIT (1 << 0)
+ #define SUMMARY_SHOW_AUTHOR_DATE (1 << 1)
+
+ ## t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh ##
+@@ t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh: create_expected_failure_apply () {
+ First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
+ Applying: second commit
+ Applying: third commit
+- Applying autostash resulted in conflicts.
+- Your changes are safe in the stash.
+- You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time.
++ Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry
++ forward your local changes resulted in conflicts:
++
++ - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them
++ successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop".
++
++ - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want
++ to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to
++ recover your local changes.
EOF
- test_cmp expect two
- '
-@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>' '
- git checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 simple &&
-
- cat <<-EOF >expect &&
-- <<<<<<< simple
-+ <<<<<<< Updated upstream
- a
- c
- e
-- ||||||| main
-+ ||||||| Stash base
- a
- b
- c
-@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>' '
- =======
- b
- d
-- >>>>>>> local
-+ >>>>>>> Stashed changes
+ }
+
+ create_expected_failure_merge () {
+ cat >expected <<-EOF
+ $(grep "^Created autostash: [0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*\$" actual)
+- Applying autostash resulted in conflicts.
+- Your changes are safe in the stash.
+- You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time.
++ Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry
++ forward your local changes resulted in conflicts:
++
++ - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them
++ successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop".
++
++ - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want
++ to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to
++ recover your local changes.
+ Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/rebased-feature-branch.
EOF
+ }
+
+ ## t/t7201-co.sh ##
+@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>' '
test_cmp expect two
'
@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>'
+
+ cat <<-EOF >expect &&
+ a
-+ <<<<<<< Updated upstream
++ <<<<<<< simple
+ c
-+ ||||||| Stash base
++ ||||||| main
+ b
+ c
+ d
@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>'
+ b
+ X
+ d
-+ >>>>>>> Stashed changes
++ >>>>>>> local
+ e
+ EOF
+ test_cmp expect two
@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>'
+ git checkout -m simple &&
+
+ cat <<-EOF >expect &&
-+ <<<<<<< Updated upstream
++ <<<<<<< simple
+ a
+ c
+ e
-+ ||||||| Stash base
++ ||||||| main
+ a
+ b
+ c
@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>'
+ =======
+ b
+ d
-+ >>>>>>> Stashed changes
++ >>>>>>> local
+ EOF
+ test_cmp expect two
+'
@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>'
+
+ fill 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >one &&
+ git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 &&
-+ test_grep "Created autostash" actual &&
++ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
+ test_grep "Applied autostash" actual &&
+ fill 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >expect &&
+ test_cmp expect one
@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>'
+ git add same &&
+ fill 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >one &&
+ git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 &&
-+ test_grep "Created autostash" actual &&
++ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
+ test_grep "Applied autostash" actual &&
+ fill 0 x y z >expect &&
+ test_cmp expect same &&
@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>'
+ test_must_fail git checkout side 2>stderr &&
+ test_grep "Your local changes" stderr &&
+ git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 &&
-+ test_grep "Created autostash" actual &&
-+ test_grep "Applying autostash resulted in conflicts" actual &&
-+ test_grep "Your changes are safe in the stash" actual &&
++ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
++ test_grep "resulted in conflicts" actual &&
++ test_grep "git stash drop" actual &&
+ git stash drop &&
+ git reset --hard
+'
@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>'
+
+ fill 1 2 3 4 5 >one &&
+ git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 &&
-+ test_grep "Your changes are safe in the stash" actual &&
++ test_grep "recover your local changes" actual &&
+ git checkout -f main &&
+ git stash pop &&
+ fill 1 2 3 4 5 >expect &&
@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>'
+ fill 1 2 3 4 5 >one &&
+ git add one &&
+ git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 &&
-+ test_grep "Created autostash" actual &&
-+ test_grep "Applying autostash resulted in conflicts" actual &&
-+ test_grep "Your changes are safe in the stash" actual &&
++ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
++ test_grep "resulted in conflicts" actual &&
++ test_grep "git stash drop" actual &&
+ git stash drop &&
+ git reset --hard
+'
@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>'
git checkout -f main &&
git reset --hard &&
+ ## t/t7600-merge.sh ##
+@@ t/t7600-merge.sh: test_expect_success 'merge --squash --autostash conflict does not attempt to app
+ >unrelated &&
+ git add unrelated &&
+ test_must_fail git merge --squash c7 --autostash >out 2>err &&
+- ! grep "Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." err &&
++ ! grep "resulted in conflicts" err &&
+ grep "When finished, apply stashed changes with \git stash pop\" out
+ '
+
+@@ t/t7600-merge.sh: test_expect_success 'merge with conflicted --autostash changes' '
+ git diff >expect &&
+ test_when_finished "test_might_fail git stash drop" &&
+ git merge --autostash c3 2>err &&
+- test_grep "Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." err &&
++ test_grep "resulted in conflicts" err &&
+ git show HEAD:file >merge-result &&
+ test_cmp result.1-9 merge-result &&
+ git stash show -p >actual &&
+
## xdiff-interface.c ##
@@ xdiff-interface.c: int parse_conflict_style_name(const char *value)
return -1;
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 56 +++++----- Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 26 ++--- builtin/checkout.c | 179 +++++++++++++++++--------------- builtin/stash.c | 30 ++++-- sequencer.c | 67 +++++++++--- sequencer.h | 4 + t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh | 24 +++-- t/t7201-co.sh | 160 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t7600-merge.sh | 4 +- xdiff-interface.c | 12 +++ xdiff-interface.h | 1 + 11 files changed, 412 insertions(+), 151 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +29 -27
@@ -251,20 +251,17 @@ working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc. are different between the current branch and the branch to which you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in order to preserve your modifications in context. - However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current - branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch - is done, and you will be on the new branch. -+ -When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting -paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge -should result in deletion of the path). + With this option, the conflicting local changes are + automatically stashed before the switch and reapplied + afterwards. If the local changes do not overlap with the + differences between branches, the switch proceeds without + stashing. If reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the + entry is saved to the stash list so you can use `git stash + pop` to recover and `git stash drop` when done. + When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate the conflicted merge in the specified paths. This option cannot be used when checking out paths from a tree-ish. -+ -When switching branches with `--merge`, staged changes may be lost. `--conflict=<style>`:: The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
@@ -578,39 +575,44 @@ $ git checkout mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a -three-way merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would save the local +changes in a stash entry and reset the working tree to allow switching: ------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Applied autostash. ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch. === 3. Merge conflict -When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with -the `-m` option, you would see something like this: +When the `--merge` (`-m`) option is in effect and the locally +modified files overlap with files that need to be updated by the +branch switch, the changes are stashed and reapplied after the +switch. If the stash application results in conflicts, they are not +resolved and the stash is saved to the stash list: ------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz -ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz -fatal: merge program failed ------------- +Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry +forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: -At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in -the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted -files. Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with -`git add` as usual: + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. ------------ -$ edit frotz -$ git add frotz ------------- + +You can try resolving the conflicts now. Edit the conflicting files +and mark them resolved with `git add` as usual, then run `git stash +drop` to discard the stash entry. Alternatively, you can clear the +working tree with `git reset --hard` and recover your local changes +later with `git stash pop`. CONFIGURATION -------------
Documentation/git-switch.adoc +13 -13
@@ -126,15 +126,14 @@ variable. If you have local modifications to one or more files that are different between the current branch and the branch to which you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in - order to preserve your modifications in context. However, - with this option, a three-way merge between the current - branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch is - done, and you will be on the new branch. -+ -When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting -paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge -should result in deletion of the path). + order to preserve your modifications in context. With this + option, the conflicting local changes are automatically + stashed before the switch and reapplied afterwards. If the + local changes do not overlap with the differences between + branches, the switch proceeds without stashing. If + reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the entry is + saved to the stash list so you can use `git stash pop` to + recover and `git stash drop` when done. `--conflict=<style>`:: The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
@@ -217,15 +216,16 @@ $ git switch mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a three-way -merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would save the local +changes in a stash entry and reset the working tree to allow switching: ------------ $ git switch -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Created autostash: 7a9afa3 +Applied autostash. ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
builtin/checkout.c +98 -81
233 lines not on this page · raw message
builtin/stash.c +24 -6
@@ -590,8 +590,11 @@ static void unstage_changes_unless_new(struct object_id *orig_tree)die (_ ("could not write index" )); } -static int do_apply_stash (const char *prefix,struct stash_info *info, -int index,int quiet) +static int do_apply_stash_with_labels (const char *prefix, +struct stash_info *info, +int index,int quiet, +const char *label1,const char *label2, +const char *label_ancestor) {int clean, ret;int has_index = index;
@@ -643,9 +646,9 @@ static int do_apply_stash(const char *prefix, struct stash_info *info,init_ui_merge_options (&o, the_repository); - o.branch1 ="Updated upstream" ; - o.branch2 ="Stashed changes" ; - o.ancestor ="Stash base" ; + o.branch1 = label1 ? label1 :"Updated upstream" ; + o.branch2 = label2 ? label2 :"Stashed changes" ; + o.ancestor = label_ancestor ? label_ancestor :"Stash base" ;if (oideq (&info->b_tree, &c_tree)) o.branch1 ="Version stash was based on" ;
@@ -717,17 +720,31 @@ restore_untracked:return ret; } +static int do_apply_stash (const char *prefix,struct stash_info *info, +int index,int quiet) +{ +return do_apply_stash_with_labels (prefix, info, index, quiet, +NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); +} +static int apply_stash (int argc,const char **argv,const char *prefix, struct repository *repo UNUSED) {int ret =-1 ;int quiet =0 ;int index = use_index; +const char *label1 =NULL , *label2 =NULL , *label_ancestor =NULL ;struct stash_info info =STASH_INFO_INIT ;struct option options[] = {OPT__QUIET (&quiet,N_ ("be quiet, only report errors" )),OPT_BOOL (0 ,"index" , &index,N_ ("attempt to recreate the index" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"ours-label" , &label1,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the upstream side in conflict markers" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"theirs-label" , &label2,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the stashed side in conflict markers" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"base-label" , &label_ancestor,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the base in diff3 conflict markers" )),OPT_END () };
@@ -737,7 +754,8 @@ static int apply_stash(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,if (get_stash_info (&info, argc, argv)) goto cleanup; - ret =do_apply_stash (prefix, &info, index, quiet); + ret =do_apply_stash_with_labels (prefix, &info, index, quiet, + label1, label2, label_ancestor); cleanup:free_stash_info (&info);return ret;
sequencer.c +51 -16
138 lines not on this page · raw message
sequencer.h +4 -0
@@ -227,11 +227,15 @@ void commit_post_rewrite(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path);void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +void create_autostash_ref_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int save_autostash (const char *path);int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid);int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label1,const char *label2, +const char *label_ancestor);#define SUMMARY_INITIAL_COMMIT (1 << 0)#define SUMMARY_SHOW_AUTHOR_DATE (1 << 1)
t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh +18 -6
@@ -61,18 +61,30 @@ create_expected_failure_apply () { First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... Applying: second commit Applying: third commit - Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. - Your changes are safe in the stash. - You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. + Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry + forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: + + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. EOF } create_expected_failure_merge () { cat >expected <<-EOF $(grep "^Created autostash: [0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*\$" actual) - Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. - Your changes are safe in the stash. - You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. + Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry + forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: + + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/rebased-feature-branch. EOF }
t/t7201-co.sh +160 -0
166 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t7600-merge.sh +2 -2
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ test_expect_success 'merge --squash --autostash conflict does not attempt to app >unrelated && git add unrelated && test_must_fail git merge --squash c7 --autostash >out 2>err && - ! grep "Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." err && + ! grep "resulted in conflicts" err && grep "When finished, apply stashed changes with \`git stash pop\`" out '
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ test_expect_success 'merge with conflicted --autostash changes' ' git diff >expect && test_when_finished "test_might_fail git stash drop" && git merge --autostash c3 2>err && - test_grep "Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." err && + test_grep "resulted in conflicts" err && git show HEAD:file >merge-result && test_cmp result.1-9 merge-result && git stash show -p >actual &&
xdiff-interface.c +12 -0
@@ -325,6 +325,18 @@ int parse_conflict_style_name(const char *value)return -1 ; } +const char *conflict_style_name (int style) +{ +switch (style) { +case XDL_MERGE_DIFF3 : +return "diff3" ; +case XDL_MERGE_ZEALOUS_DIFF3 : +return "zdiff3" ; +default : +return "merge" ; + } +} +int git_xmerge_style =-1 ; int git_xmerge_config(const char *var, const char *value,
xdiff-interface.h +1 -0
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ void xdiff_set_find_func(xdemitconf_t *xecfg, const char *line, int cflags);void xdiff_clear_find_func (xdemitconf_t *xecfg);struct config_context ;int parse_conflict_style_name (const char *value); +const char *conflict_style_name (int style);int git_xmerge_config (const char *var,const char *value,const struct config_context *ctx,void *cb);extern int git_xmerge_style;
base-commit: dc6ecd5354dca88d51b6d6562777fc8fc10d77e1
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v4] checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
Quoted 10 lines · Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
When switching branches with "git checkout -m", local modifications can block the switch. Teach the -m flow to create a temporary stash before switching and reapply it after. On success, only "Applied autostash." is shown. If reapplying causes conflicts, the stash is kept and the user is told they can resolve and run "git stash drop", or run "git reset --hard" and later "git stash pop" to recover their changes.
Quoted 5 lines
Signed-off-by Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>---
checkout: 'autostash' for branch switchingcc Phillip Wood [email protected]
I very much appreciate this, but somehow this "cc:" seems to have been ignored.
Quoted 26 lines
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 56 +++++----- Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 26 ++--- builtin/checkout.c | 179 +++++++++++++++++--------------- builtin/stash.c | 30 ++++-- sequencer.c | 67 +++++++++--- sequencer.h | 4 + t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh | 24 +++-- t/t7201-co.sh | 160 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t7600-merge.sh | 4 +- xdiff-interface.c | 12 +++ xdiff-interface.h | 1 + 11 files changed, 412 insertions(+), 151 deletions(-)Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +0
-5@@ -251,20 +251,17 @@ working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc. are different between the current branch and the branch to which you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in order to preserve your modifications in context. - However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current - branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch - is done, and you will be on the new branch. -+ -When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc. · line 260
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +7
-3-paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge -should result in deletion of the path). + With this option, the conflicting local changes are + automatically stashed before the switch and reapplied + afterwards. If the local changes do not overlap with the + differences between branches, the switch proceeds without + stashing. If reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the + entry is saved to the stash list so you can use `git stash + pop` to recover and `git stash drop` when done.
The new conflict message in sequencer.c correctly points out that, if the user wants to use git stash pop, they would first need to clear the working tree (e.g. git reset --hard) because the conflicted changes are already there.
The documentation here is a bit too simplified and may give the impression that git stash pop is the immediate next step when conflicts are present in the worktree, which is probably something we want to avoid.
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc $ git checkout mytopic · line 584
Quoted 5 lines
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +1
-1------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Applied autostash. ------------
I must be utterly confused, but the documentation _before_ this patch does not seem to match the reality. In the following illustration, I am switching to another branch that has contents in transport.c that is different from the version in HEAD:
$ git checkout master
$ echo >>transport.c
$ git checkout jk/transport-color-leakfix
error: Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten...
transport.c
Please commit your changes or stash ...
Aborting
$ git checkout -m jk/transport-color-leakfix
M transport.c
Switched to branch 'jk/transport-color-leakfix'Hmmmm.
The new behavior is silent about individual files, and instead reports "Applied autostash."; even though it is consistent with how other commands may behave when given the "--autostash" option, I am not sure if it is even necessary.
Even in the documented version, the "Auto-merging" message is presumably given only to the paths that needed real content-level merges, and the paths that went through the trivial tree-level merges (i.e., paths that are different from HEAD and mytopic but without local changes) are not reported. The behaviour I am seeing does not say anything to either trivially merged or really merged paths while branch switching is happening, and shows the local changes at the end of merge_working_tree() by calling show_local_changes(), which runs "git diff --name-status" in-process.
In either case, the stashing is a mere implementation detail of carrying the local changes with you when you move to a different branch, and moving with your local changes is what "Switching" branch is about in this system, so I am not sure if we need to say anything more than the current "Switched to branch 'mytopic'" in the successful case.
Quoted 33 lines
builtin/checkout.c +3
-4@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@#include "merge-ll.h" #include "lockfile.h" #include "mem-pool.h" -#include "merge-ort-wrappers.h" #include "object-file.h" #include "object-name.h" #include "odb.h" @@ -30,6 +29,7 @@#include "repo-settings.h" #include "resolve-undo.h" #include "revision.h" +#include "sequencer.h" #include "setup.h" #include "submodule.h" #include "symlinks.h" @@ -845,83 +845,8 @@ static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *opts, ret =unpack_trees (2 , trees, &topts);clear_unpack_trees_porcelain (&topts); -if (ret ==-1 ) { -... - } +if (ret ==-1 ) +return 1 ; }if (!cache_tree_fully_valid (the_repository->index->cache_tree))
builtin/checkout.c static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *opts, · line 934
Quoted 5 lines
builtin/checkout.c +0
-2@@ -930,9 +855,6 @@ static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *opts,if (write_locked_index (the_repository->index, &lock_file,COMMIT_LOCK ))die (_ ("unable to write new index file" )); -if (!opts->discard_changes && !opts->quiet && new_branch_info->commit) -show_local_changes (&new_branch_info->commit->object, &opts->diff_options);
Ah, this is what you lost. I do not see a reason why we would want to lose it.
builtin/checkout.c static void orphaned_commit_warning(struct commit *old_commit, struct commit *ne · line 1126
Quoted 11 lines
builtin/checkout.c +11
-0+static int checkout_would_clobber_changes (struct branch_info *old_branch_info, +struct branch_info *new_branch_info) +{ +... +init_tree_desc (&trees[0 ], &old_tree->object.oid, + old_tree->buffer, old_tree->size); +init_tree_desc (&trees[1 ], &new_tree->object.oid, + new_tree->buffer, new_tree->size); + + ret =unpack_trees (2 , trees, &topts); +discard_index (&tmp_index);
In my original outline, I did suggest
- check if the local changes overlap with paths that differ between HEAD and the new branch, and if not, we need no stashing; otherwise stash.
- then switch branches with two-way merge
- then unstash.
But my untold assumption was that the initial check was done by running a moral equivalent of "git diff --name-only HEAD <branch>" to obtain the list of paths that differ between branches, and a "git diff HEAD" to obtain the list of paths with local changes.
If you are using the real branch switching machinery in the "dry-run" mode, then it is a waste to discard when we find out that there is no overlap. So if I knew you would use the unpack-trees in the dry-run mode, instead of two diffs, the outline would have been more like
- Try unpack-trees in dry-run mode to see if there would get any failure from overlap.
- If unpack-trees would succeed, we already have the right contents in the index after the above dry-run. We did not touch the working tree so far, but if we kept track of which paths we would have written out to the working tree during our dry-run, we can write them out of the index at this point and we are done (we of course need to update HEAD to point at the new branch, give the "Switched to branch 'foo'" message, etc., but the real work of switching branches is done).
- If not, discard the dry-run index, stash, switch branches the usual way, and unstash.
which might be more performant in a large tree.
Having said all that, what we see above, while running the same unpack-trees once in dry-run mode and another for real, may be performant enough and complicating the dry-run code might not be worth it.
Quoted 34 lines
builtin/checkout.c +20
-0@@ -1165,6 +1136,8 @@ static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,struct object_id rev;int flag, writeout_error =0 ;int do_merge =1 ; +struct strbuf old_commit_shortname =STRBUF_INIT ; +const char *stash_label_ancestor =NULL ;trace2_cmd_mode ("branch" );@@ -1202,10 +1175,34 @@ static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts, do_merge =0 ; } +if (old_branch_info.name) + stash_label_ancestor = old_branch_info.name; +else if (old_branch_info.commit) { +strbuf_add_unique_abbrev (&old_commit_shortname, + &old_branch_info.commit->object.oid, +DEFAULT_ABBREV ); + stash_label_ancestor = old_commit_shortname.buf; + } + +if (opts->merge) { +if (repo_read_index (the_repository) <0 ) +die (_ ("index file corrupt" )); +if (checkout_would_clobber_changes (&old_branch_info, + new_branch_info)) +create_autostash_ref_silent (the_repository, +"CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH" ); + } +if (do_merge) { ret =merge_working_tree (opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info, &writeout_error);if (ret) {
builtin/checkout.c static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts, · line 1208
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/checkout.c +6
-0+apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (the_repository, +"CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH" , + new_branch_info->name, +"local" , + stash_label_ancestor);branch_info_release (&old_branch_info); +strbuf_release (&old_commit_shortname);return ret; } }
Nice changes to preserve the conflict marker labels.
builtin/stash.c
Quoted 4 lines
builtin/stash.c +0
-0
This can and should become a separate patch that is a preliminary preparation step, [1/2], with its own documentation and test, only about teaching "git stash" command a set of new options to use custom conflict labels, I think. And on top of it, patch [2/2] that updates "checkout -m" to use the improved "git stash" with custom labels support is written. It would give us a clean logical progression of the series.
Quoted 33 lines
sequencer.c +5
-3@@ -4632,7 +4632,8 @@ static enum todo_command peek_command(struct todo_list *todo_list, int offset)static void create_autostash_internal (struct repository *r,const char *path, -const char *refname) +const char *refname, +int silent) {struct strbuf buf =STRBUF_INIT ;struct lock_file lock_file =LOCK_INIT ;@@ -4677,7 +4678,8 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r, &oid, null_oid(the_hash_algo), 0, UPDATE_REFS_DIE_ON_ERR); } -printf (_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf); +if (!silent) +fprintf (stderr,_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf);if (reset_head (r, &ropts) <0 )die (_ ("could not reset --hard" ));discard_index (r->index);@@ -4689,15 +4691,22 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path) { -create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL ); +create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL ,0 ); }void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname)
sequencer.c static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r, · line 4705
Quoted 10 lines
sequencer.c +5
-2{ -create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname); +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname,0 ); } -static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply) +void create_autostash_ref_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname) +{ +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname,1 ); +}
Changes around here to optionally squelch message(s) is better presented as yet another preliminary preparation step, I think.
Quoted 50 lines
sequencer.c +11
-6@@ -4752,7 +4775,8 @@ static int apply_save_autostash(const char *path, int attempt_apply) }strbuf_trim (&stash_oid); - ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply); + ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply, +NULL ,NULL ,NULL );unlink (path);strbuf_release (&stash_oid);@@ -4771,11 +4795,13 @@ int apply_autostash(const char *path)int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid) { -return apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid,1 ); +return apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid,1 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); }static int apply_save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname, -int attempt_apply) +int attempt_apply, +const char *label1,const char *label2, +const char *label_ancestor) {struct object_id stash_oid;char stash_oid_hex[GIT_MAX_HEXSZ +1 ];@@ -4791,7 +4817,8 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,return error (_ ("autostash reference is a symref" ));oid_to_hex_r (stash_oid_hex, &stash_oid); - ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply); + ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply, + label1, label2, label_ancestor);refs_delete_ref (get_main_ref_store (r),"" , refname, &stash_oid,REF_NO_DEREF );@@ -4801,12 +4828,20 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,0 ); +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,0 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); }int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 ); +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); +}
sequencer.c static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname, · line 4847
Quoted 10 lines
sequencer.c +7
-0+ +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label1,const char *label2, +const char *label_ancestor) +{ +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 , + label1, label2, label_ancestor); } static int checkout_onto(struct repository *r, struct replay_opts *opts,
So are these, to teach the machinery to take optional conflict marker labels.
Thanks.
v5 cover checkout: 'autostash' for branch switching
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetHarald Nordgren (4):
stash: add --ours-label, --theirs-label, --base-label for apply
sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker
labels
checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 58 +++++----- Documentation/git-stash.adoc | 11 +- Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 27 ++--- builtin/checkout.c | 180 ++++++++++++++++++-------------- builtin/stash.c | 32 ++++-- sequencer.c | 67 +++++++++--- sequencer.h | 4 + t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh | 24 +++-- t/t3903-stash.sh | 18 ++++ t/t7201-co.sh | 160 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t7600-merge.sh | 2 +- xdiff-interface.c | 12 +++ xdiff-interface.h | 1 + 13 files changed, 447 insertions(+), 149 deletions(-)
base-commit: dc6ecd5354dca88d51b6d6562777fc8fc10d77e1
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-2234%2FHaraldNordgren%2Fcheckout_autostash-v5
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-2234/HaraldNordgren/checkout_autostash-v5
Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/2234
Range-diff vs v4:
-: ---------- > 1: 00d8920498 stash: add --ours-label, --theirs-label, --base-label for apply -: ---------- > 2: 5d176f1700 sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently -: ---------- > 3: 3d6829438a sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels 1: 5d49c0031a ! 4: 7f3735d40e checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
@@ Documentation/git-checkout.adoc: working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, e
+ afterwards. If the local changes do not overlap with the
+ differences between branches, the switch proceeds without
+ stashing. If reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the
-+ entry is saved to the stash list so you can use `git stash
-+ pop to recover and git stash drop` when done.
++ entry is saved to the stash list. Resolve the conflicts
++ and run git stash drop when done, or clear the working
++ tree (e.g. with git reset --hard) before running `git stash
++ pop` later to re-apply your changes.
+
When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate the conflicted merge in the specified paths. This option cannot be
@@ Documentation/git-checkout.adoc: $ git checkout mytopic
-You can give the -m flag to the command, which would try a -three-way merge:
-+You can give the -m flag to the command, which would save the local -+changes in a stash entry and reset the working tree to allow switching:
++You can give the -m flag to the command, which would carry your local ++changes to the new branch:
------------
$ git checkout -m mytopic
-Auto-merging frotz
-+Applied autostash.
++Switched to branch 'mytopic'
------------
-After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_
@@ Documentation/git-switch.adoc: variable.
+ local changes do not overlap with the differences between
+ branches, the switch proceeds without stashing. If
+ reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the entry is
-+ saved to the stash list so you can use git stash pop to
-+ recover and git stash drop when done.
++ saved to the stash list. Resolve the conflicts and run
++ git stash drop when done, or clear the working tree
++ (e.g. with git reset --hard) before running git stash pop
++ later to re-apply your changes.
--conflict=<style>::
The same as --merge option above, but changes the way the
@@ Documentation/git-switch.adoc: $ git switch mytopic
-You can give the -m flag to the command, which would try a three-way -merge:
-+You can give the -m flag to the command, which would save the local -+changes in a stash entry and reset the working tree to allow switching:
++You can give the -m flag to the command, which would carry your local ++changes to the new branch:
------------
$ git switch -m mytopic
-Auto-merging frotz
-+Created autostash: 7a9afa3
-+Applied autostash.
++Switched to branch 'mytopic'
------------
-After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *op
}
if (!cache_tree_fully_valid(the_repository->index->cache_tree))
-@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
- if (write_locked_index(the_repository->index, &lock_file, COMMIT_LOCK))
- die(_("unable to write new index file"));
-
-- if (!opts->discard_changes && !opts->quiet && new_branch_info->commit)
-- show_local_changes(&new_branch_info->commit->object, &opts->diff_options);
--
- return 0;
- }
-
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static void orphaned_commit_warning(struct commit *old_commit, struct commit *ne
release_revisions(&revs);
}
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
struct object_id rev;
int flag, writeout_error = 0;
int do_merge = 1;
++ int created_autostash = 0;
+ struct strbuf old_commit_shortname = STRBUF_INIT;
+ const char *stash_label_ancestor = NULL;
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
+ if (repo_read_index(the_repository) < 0)
+ die(_("index file corrupt"));
+ if (checkout_would_clobber_changes(&old_branch_info,
-+ new_branch_info))
++ new_branch_info)) {
+ create_autostash_ref_silent(the_repository,
+ "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH");
++ created_autostash = 1;
++ }
+ }
+
if (do_merge) {
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
+ if (repo_read_index(the_repository) < 0)
+ die(_("index file corrupt"));
+
-+ if (!opts->discard_changes && !opts->quiet && new_branch_info->commit)
++ if (created_autostash && !opts->discard_changes && !opts->quiet &&
++ new_branch_info->commit)
+ show_local_changes(&new_branch_info->commit->object,
+ &opts->diff_options);
+
@@ builtin/stash.c: static int apply_stash(int argc, const char **argv, const char
return ret;
## sequencer.c ##
-@@ sequencer.c: static enum todo_command peek_command(struct todo_list *todo_list, int offset) -
- static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,
- const char *path,
-- const char *refname)
-+ const char *refname,
-+ int silent)
- {
- struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
- struct lock_file lock_file = LOCK_INIT;
-@@ sequencer.c: static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,
- &oid, null_oid(the_hash_algo), 0, UPDATE_REFS_DIE_ON_ERR);
- }
-
-- printf(_("Created autostash: %s\n"), buf.buf);
-+ if (!silent)
-+ fprintf(stderr, _("Created autostash: %s\n"), buf.buf);
- if (reset_head(r, &ropts) < 0)
- die(_("could not reset --hard"));
- discard_index(r->index);
-@@ sequencer.c: static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,
-
- void create_autostash(struct repository *r, const char *path)
- {
-- create_autostash_internal(r, path, NULL);
-+ create_autostash_internal(r, path, NULL, 0);
- }
-
- void create_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
- {
-- create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname);
-+ create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, 0);
- }
-
--static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply) -+void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname) -+{
-+ create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, 1);
-+}
-+
-+static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply,
-+ const char *label1, const char *label2,
-+ const char *label_ancestor)
- {
- struct child_process child = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
- int ret = 0;
-@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply)
- child.no_stderr = 1;
- strvec_push(&child.args, "stash");
- strvec_push(&child.args, "apply");
-+ if (label1)
-+ strvec_pushf(&child.args, "--ours-label=%s", label1);
-+ if (label2)
-+ strvec_pushf(&child.args, "--theirs-label=%s", label2);
-+ if (label_ancestor)
-+ strvec_pushf(&child.args, "--base-label=%s", label_ancestor);
- strvec_push(&child.args, stash_oid);
- ret = run_command(&child);
- }
-@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply) +@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply,
strvec_push(&store.args, stash_oid);
if (run_command(&store))
ret = error(_("cannot store %s"), stash_oid);
@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int atte
}
return ret;
-@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash(const char *path, int attempt_apply)
- }
- strbuf_trim(&stash_oid);
-
-- ret = apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply);
-+ ret = apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply,
-+ NULL, NULL, NULL);
-
- unlink(path);
- strbuf_release(&stash_oid);
-@@ sequencer.c: int apply_autostash(const char *path)
-
- int apply_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid)
- {
-- return apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid, 1);
-+ return apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL);
- }
-
- static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
-- int attempt_apply)
-+ int attempt_apply,
-+ const char *label1, const char *label2,
-+ const char *label_ancestor)
- {
- struct object_id stash_oid;
- char stash_oid_hex[GIT_MAX_HEXSZ + 1];
-@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
- return error(_("autostash reference is a symref"));
-
- oid_to_hex_r(stash_oid_hex, &stash_oid);
-- ret = apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply);
-+ ret = apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply,
-+ label1, label2, label_ancestor);
-
- refs_delete_ref(get_main_ref_store(r), "", refname,
- &stash_oid, REF_NO_DEREF);
-@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname, -
- int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
- {
-- return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 0);
-+ return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL);
- }
-
- int apply_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
- {
-- return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 1);
-+ return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL);
-+}
-+
-+int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
-+ const char *label1, const char *label2,
-+ const char *label_ancestor)
-+{
-+ return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 1,
-+ label1, label2, label_ancestor);
- }
-
- static int checkout_onto(struct repository *r, struct replay_opts *opts,
-
- ## sequencer.h ##
-@@ sequencer.h: void commit_post_rewrite(struct repository *r,
-
- void create_autostash(struct repository *r, const char *path);
- void create_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);
-+void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname);
- int save_autostash(const char *path);
- int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);
- int apply_autostash(const char *path);
- int apply_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid);
- int apply_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);
-+int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
-+ const char *label1, const char *label2,
-+ const char *label_ancestor);
-
- #define SUMMARY_INITIAL_COMMIT (1 << 0)
- #define SUMMARY_SHOW_AUTHOR_DATE (1 << 1)
## t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh ##
@@ t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh: create_expected_failure_apply () {
@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>'
git reset --hard &&
## t/t7600-merge.sh ##
-@@ t/t7600-merge.sh: test_expect_success 'merge --squash --autostash conflict does not attempt to app
- >unrelated &&
- git add unrelated &&
- test_must_fail git merge --squash c7 --autostash >out 2>err &&
-- ! grep "Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." err &&
-+ ! grep "resulted in conflicts" err &&
- grep "When finished, apply stashed changes with \git stash pop\" out
- '
-
@@ t/t7600-merge.sh: test_expect_success 'merge with conflicted --autostash changes' '
git diff >expect &&
test_when_finished "test_might_fail git stash drop" &&
git merge --autostash c3 2>err &&
- test_grep "Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." err &&
-+ test_grep "resulted in conflicts" err &&
++ test_grep "your local changes resulted in conflicts" err &&
git show HEAD:file >merge-result &&
test_cmp result.1-9 merge-result &&
git stash show -p >actual &&
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v5 1/4 stash: add --ours-label, --theirs-label, --base-label for apply
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Allow callers of "git stash apply" to pass custom labels for conflict markers instead of the default "Updated upstream" and "Stashed changes". Document the new options and add a test.
--- Documentation/git-stash.adoc | 11 ++++++++++- builtin/stash.c | 2 +- t/t3903-stash.sh | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-stash.adoc +10 -1
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ git stash list [<log-options>] git stash show [-u | --include-untracked | --only-untracked] [<diff-options>] [<stash>] git stash drop [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] git stash pop [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] -git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] +git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--ours-label=<label>] [--theirs-label=<label>] [--base-label=<label>] [<stash>] git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>] git stash [push [-p | --patch] [-S | --staged] [-k | --[no-]keep-index] [-q | --quiet] [-u | --include-untracked] [-a | --all] [(-m | --message) <message>]
@@ -197,6 +197,15 @@ the index's ones. However, this can fail, when you have conflicts (which are stored in the index, where you therefore can no longer apply the changes as they were originally). +`--ours-label=<label>`:: +`--theirs-label=<label>`:: +`--base-label=<label>`:: + These options are only valid for the `apply` command. ++ +Use the given labels in conflict markers instead of the default +"Updated upstream", "Stashed changes", and "Stash base". +`--base-label` only has an effect with merge.conflictStyle=diff3. + `-k`:: `--keep-index`:: `--no-keep-index`::
builtin/stash.c +1 -1
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@#define BUILTIN_STASH_POP_USAGE \ N_("git stash pop [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_APPLY_USAGE \ - N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]") + N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--ours-label=<label>] [--theirs-label=<label>] [--base-label=<label>] [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_BRANCH_USAGE \ N_("git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_STORE_USAGE \
t/t3903-stash.sh +18 -0
@@ -1666,6 +1666,24 @@ test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' ' ) ' +test_expect_success 'apply with custom conflict labels' ' + git init conflict_labels && + ( + cd conflict_labels && + echo base >file && + git add file && + git commit -m base && + echo stashed >file && + git stash push -m "stashed" && + echo upstream >file && + git add file && + git commit -m upstream && + test_must_fail git stash apply --ours-label=UP --theirs-label=STASH && + grep "^<<<<<<< UP" file && + grep "^>>>>>>> STASH" file + ) +' + test_expect_success 'stash create reports a locked index' ' test_when_finished "rm -rf repo" && git init repo &&
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v5 2/4 sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add a silent parameter to create_autostash_internal and introduce create_autostash_ref_silent so that callers can create an autostash without printing the "Created autostash" message. Use stderr for the message when not silent.
--- sequencer.c | 15 +++++++++++---- sequencer.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
sequencer.c +11 -4
@@ -4632,7 +4632,8 @@ static enum todo_command peek_command(struct todo_list *todo_list, int offset)static void create_autostash_internal (struct repository *r,const char *path, -const char *refname) +const char *refname, +int silent) {struct strbuf buf =STRBUF_INIT ;struct lock_file lock_file =LOCK_INIT ;
@@ -4677,7 +4678,8 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r, &oid, null_oid(the_hash_algo), 0, UPDATE_REFS_DIE_ON_ERR); } -printf (_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf); +if (!silent) +fprintf (stderr,_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf);if (reset_head (r, &ropts) <0 )die (_ ("could not reset --hard" ));discard_index (r->index);
@@ -4689,12 +4691,17 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path) { -create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL ); +create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL ,0 ); }void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname); +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname,0 ); +} + +void create_autostash_ref_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname) +{ +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname,1 ); }static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply)
sequencer.h +1 -0
@@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ void commit_post_rewrite(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path);void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +void create_autostash_ref_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int save_autostash (const char *path);int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v5 3/4 sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add label1, label2, and label_ancestor parameters to the autostash apply machinery so callers can pass custom conflict marker labels through to "git stash apply --ours-label/--theirs-label/--base-label". Introduce apply_autostash_ref_with_labels() for callers that want to pass labels.
--- sequencer.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- sequencer.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
sequencer.c +27 -7
@@ -4704,7 +4704,9 @@ void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname)create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname,1 ); } -static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply) +static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply, +const char *label1,const char *label2, +const char *label_ancestor) {struct child_process child =CHILD_PROCESS_INIT ;int ret =0 ;
@@ -4715,6 +4717,12 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply) child.no_stderr =1 ;strvec_push (&child.args,"stash" );strvec_push (&child.args,"apply" ); +if (label1) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--ours-label=%s" , label1); +if (label2) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--theirs-label=%s" , label2); +if (label_ancestor) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--base-label=%s" , label_ancestor);strvec_push (&child.args, stash_oid); ret =run_command (&child); }
@@ -4759,7 +4767,8 @@ static int apply_save_autostash(const char *path, int attempt_apply) }strbuf_trim (&stash_oid); - ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply); + ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply, +NULL ,NULL ,NULL );unlink (path);strbuf_release (&stash_oid);
@@ -4778,11 +4787,13 @@ int apply_autostash(const char *path)int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid) { -return apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid,1 ); +return apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid,1 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); }static int apply_save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname, -int attempt_apply) +int attempt_apply, +const char *label1,const char *label2, +const char *label_ancestor) {struct object_id stash_oid;char stash_oid_hex[GIT_MAX_HEXSZ +1 ];
@@ -4798,7 +4809,8 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,return error (_ ("autostash reference is a symref" ));oid_to_hex_r (stash_oid_hex, &stash_oid); - ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply); + ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply, + label1, label2, label_ancestor);refs_delete_ref (get_main_ref_store (r),"" , refname, &stash_oid,REF_NO_DEREF );
@@ -4808,12 +4820,20 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,0 ); +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,0 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); }int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 ); +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); +} + +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label1,const char *label2, +const char *label_ancestor) +{ +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 , + label1, label2, label_ancestor); } static int checkout_onto(struct repository *r, struct replay_opts *opts,
sequencer.h +3 -0
@@ -233,6 +233,9 @@ int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid);int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label1,const char *label2, +const char *label_ancestor);#define SUMMARY_INITIAL_COMMIT (1 << 0)#define SUMMARY_SHOW_AUTHOR_DATE (1 << 1)
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v5 4/4 checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
When switching branches with "git checkout -m", local modifications can block the switch. Teach the -m flow to create a temporary stash before switching and reapply it after. On success, only "Applied autostash." is shown. If reapplying causes conflicts, the stash is kept and the user is told they can resolve and run "git stash drop", or run "git reset --hard" and later "git stash pop" to recover their changes.
--- Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 58 +++++----- Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 27 ++--- builtin/checkout.c | 180 ++++++++++++++++++-------------- builtin/stash.c | 30 ++++-- sequencer.c | 18 +++- t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh | 24 +++-- t/t7201-co.sh | 160 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t7600-merge.sh | 2 +- xdiff-interface.c | 12 +++ xdiff-interface.h | 1 + 10 files changed, 376 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +31 -27
@@ -251,20 +251,19 @@ working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc. are different between the current branch and the branch to which you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in order to preserve your modifications in context. - However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current - branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch - is done, and you will be on the new branch. -+ -When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting -paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge -should result in deletion of the path). + With this option, the conflicting local changes are + automatically stashed before the switch and reapplied + afterwards. If the local changes do not overlap with the + differences between branches, the switch proceeds without + stashing. If reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the + entry is saved to the stash list. Resolve the conflicts + and run `git stash drop` when done, or clear the working + tree (e.g. with `git reset --hard`) before running `git stash + pop` later to re-apply your changes. + When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate the conflicted merge in the specified paths. This option cannot be used when checking out paths from a tree-ish. -+ -When switching branches with `--merge`, staged changes may be lost. `--conflict=<style>`:: The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
@@ -578,39 +577,44 @@ $ git checkout mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a -three-way merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would carry your local +changes to the new branch: ------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Switched to branch 'mytopic' ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch. === 3. Merge conflict -When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with -the `-m` option, you would see something like this: +When the `--merge` (`-m`) option is in effect and the locally +modified files overlap with files that need to be updated by the +branch switch, the changes are stashed and reapplied after the +switch. If the stash application results in conflicts, they are not +resolved and the stash is saved to the stash list: ------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz -ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz -fatal: merge program failed ------------- +Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry +forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: -At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in -the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted -files. Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with -`git add` as usual: + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. ------------ -$ edit frotz -$ git add frotz ------------- + +You can try resolving the conflicts now. Edit the conflicting files +and mark them resolved with `git add` as usual, then run `git stash +drop` to discard the stash entry. Alternatively, you can clear the +working tree with `git reset --hard` and recover your local changes +later with `git stash pop`. CONFIGURATION -------------
Documentation/git-switch.adoc +14 -13
@@ -126,15 +126,16 @@ variable. If you have local modifications to one or more files that are different between the current branch and the branch to which you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in - order to preserve your modifications in context. However, - with this option, a three-way merge between the current - branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch is - done, and you will be on the new branch. -+ -When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting -paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge -should result in deletion of the path). + order to preserve your modifications in context. With this + option, the conflicting local changes are automatically + stashed before the switch and reapplied afterwards. If the + local changes do not overlap with the differences between + branches, the switch proceeds without stashing. If + reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the entry is + saved to the stash list. Resolve the conflicts and run + `git stash drop` when done, or clear the working tree + (e.g. with `git reset --hard`) before running `git stash pop` + later to re-apply your changes. `--conflict=<style>`:: The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
@@ -217,15 +218,15 @@ $ git switch mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a three-way -merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would carry your local +changes to the new branch: ------------ $ git switch -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Switched to branch 'mytopic' ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
builtin/checkout.c +102 -78
228 lines not on this page · raw message
builtin/stash.c +24 -6
@@ -590,8 +590,11 @@ static void unstage_changes_unless_new(struct object_id *orig_tree)die (_ ("could not write index" )); } -static int do_apply_stash (const char *prefix,struct stash_info *info, -int index,int quiet) +static int do_apply_stash_with_labels (const char *prefix, +struct stash_info *info, +int index,int quiet, +const char *label1,const char *label2, +const char *label_ancestor) {int clean, ret;int has_index = index;
@@ -643,9 +646,9 @@ static int do_apply_stash(const char *prefix, struct stash_info *info,init_ui_merge_options (&o, the_repository); - o.branch1 ="Updated upstream" ; - o.branch2 ="Stashed changes" ; - o.ancestor ="Stash base" ; + o.branch1 = label1 ? label1 :"Updated upstream" ; + o.branch2 = label2 ? label2 :"Stashed changes" ; + o.ancestor = label_ancestor ? label_ancestor :"Stash base" ;if (oideq (&info->b_tree, &c_tree)) o.branch1 ="Version stash was based on" ;
@@ -717,17 +720,31 @@ restore_untracked:return ret; } +static int do_apply_stash (const char *prefix,struct stash_info *info, +int index,int quiet) +{ +return do_apply_stash_with_labels (prefix, info, index, quiet, +NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); +} +static int apply_stash (int argc,const char **argv,const char *prefix, struct repository *repo UNUSED) {int ret =-1 ;int quiet =0 ;int index = use_index; +const char *label1 =NULL , *label2 =NULL , *label_ancestor =NULL ;struct stash_info info =STASH_INFO_INIT ;struct option options[] = {OPT__QUIET (&quiet,N_ ("be quiet, only report errors" )),OPT_BOOL (0 ,"index" , &index,N_ ("attempt to recreate the index" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"ours-label" , &label1,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the upstream side in conflict markers" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"theirs-label" , &label2,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the stashed side in conflict markers" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"base-label" , &label_ancestor,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the base in diff3 conflict markers" )),OPT_END () };
@@ -737,7 +754,8 @@ static int apply_stash(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,if (get_stash_info (&info, argc, argv)) goto cleanup; - ret =do_apply_stash (prefix, &info, index, quiet); + ret =do_apply_stash_with_labels (prefix, &info, index, quiet, + label1, label2, label_ancestor); cleanup:free_stash_info (&info);return ret;
sequencer.c +13 -5
@@ -4741,15 +4741,23 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply,strvec_push (&store.args, stash_oid);if (run_command (&store)) ret =error (_ ("cannot store %s" ), stash_oid); +else if (attempt_apply) +fprintf (stderr, +_ ("Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry\n" +"forward your local changes resulted in conflicts:\n" +"\n" +" - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them\n" +" successfully, discard the stash entry with \"git stash drop\".\n" +"\n" +" - Alternatively you can \"git reset --hard\" if you do not want\n" +" to deal with them right now, and later \"git stash pop\" to\n" +" recover your local changes.\n" ));else fprintf (stderr, -_ ("%s\n" +_ ("Autostash exists; creating a new stash entry.\n" "Your changes are safe in the stash.\n" "You can run \"git stash pop\" or" -" \"git stash drop\" at any time.\n" ), - attempt_apply ? -_ ("Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." ) : -_ ("Autostash exists; creating a new stash entry." )); +" \"git stash drop\" at any time.\n" )); }return ret;
t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh +18 -6
@@ -61,18 +61,30 @@ create_expected_failure_apply () { First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... Applying: second commit Applying: third commit - Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. - Your changes are safe in the stash. - You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. + Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry + forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: + + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. EOF } create_expected_failure_merge () { cat >expected <<-EOF $(grep "^Created autostash: [0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*\$" actual) - Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. - Your changes are safe in the stash. - You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. + Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry + forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: + + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/rebased-feature-branch. EOF }
t/t7201-co.sh +160 -0
166 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t7600-merge.sh +1 -1
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ test_expect_success 'merge with conflicted --autostash changes' ' git diff >expect && test_when_finished "test_might_fail git stash drop" && git merge --autostash c3 2>err && - test_grep "Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." err && + test_grep "your local changes resulted in conflicts" err && git show HEAD:file >merge-result && test_cmp result.1-9 merge-result && git stash show -p >actual &&
xdiff-interface.c +12 -0
@@ -325,6 +325,18 @@ int parse_conflict_style_name(const char *value)return -1 ; } +const char *conflict_style_name (int style) +{ +switch (style) { +case XDL_MERGE_DIFF3 : +return "diff3" ; +case XDL_MERGE_ZEALOUS_DIFF3 : +return "zdiff3" ; +default : +return "merge" ; + } +} +int git_xmerge_style =-1 ; int git_xmerge_config(const char *var, const char *value,
xdiff-interface.h +1 -0
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ void xdiff_set_find_func(xdemitconf_t *xecfg, const char *line, int cflags);void xdiff_clear_find_func (xdemitconf_t *xecfg);struct config_context ;int parse_conflict_style_name (const char *value); +const char *conflict_style_name (int style);int git_xmerge_config (const char *var,const char *value,const struct config_context *ctx,void *cb);extern int git_xmerge_style;
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
v6 cover checkout: 'autostash' for branch switching
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetHarald Nordgren (4):
stash: add --ours-label, --theirs-label, --base-label for apply
sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker
labels
checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 58 ++++++------ Documentation/git-stash.adoc | 11 ++- Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 27 +++--- builtin/checkout.c | 137 ++++++++++++--------------- builtin/stash.c | 32 +++++-- sequencer.c | 67 +++++++++---- sequencer.h | 4 + t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh | 24 +++-- t/t3903-stash.sh | 18 ++++ t/t7201-co.sh | 160 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t7600-merge.sh | 2 +- xdiff-interface.c | 12 +++ xdiff-interface.h | 1 + 13 files changed, 403 insertions(+), 150 deletions(-)
base-commit: ca1db8a0f7dc0dbea892e99f5b37c5fe5861be71
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-2234%2FHaraldNordgren%2Fcheckout_autostash-v6
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-2234/HaraldNordgren/checkout_autostash-v6
Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/2234
Range-diff vs v5:
1: 00d8920498 = 1: cd9c64ba60 stash: add --ours-label, --theirs-label, --base-label for apply
2: 5d176f1700 = 2: d572c4bb7d sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
3: 3d6829438a = 3: 80a98116fc sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels
4: 7f3735d40e ! 4: 7ecb0835b7 checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
@@ builtin/checkout.c
#include "submodule.h"
#include "symlinks.h"
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
+ struct tree *new_tree;
+ repo_hold_locked_index(the_repository, &lock_file, LOCK_DIE_ON_ERROR);
+- if (repo_read_index_preload(the_repository, NULL, 0) < 0)
++ if (repo_read_index_preload(the_repository, NULL, 0) < 0) {
++ rollback_lock_file(&lock_file);
+ return error(_("index file corrupt"));
++ }
+
+ resolve_undo_clear_index(the_repository->index);
+ if (opts->new_orphan_branch && opts->orphan_from_empty_tree) {
+@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
+ } else {
+ new_tree = repo_get_commit_tree(the_repository,
+ new_branch_info->commit);
+- if (!new_tree)
++ if (!new_tree) {
++ rollback_lock_file(&lock_file);
+ return error(_("unable to read tree (%s)"),
+ oid_to_hex(&new_branch_info->commit->object.oid));
++ }
+ }
+ if (opts->discard_changes) {
+ ret = reset_tree(new_tree, opts, 1, writeout_error, new_branch_info);
+- if (ret)
++ if (ret) {
++ rollback_lock_file(&lock_file);
+ return ret;
++ }
+ } else {
+ struct tree_desc trees[2];
+ struct tree *tree;
+@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
+ refresh_index(the_repository->index, REFRESH_QUIET, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+
+ if (unmerged_index(the_repository->index)) {
++ rollback_lock_file(&lock_file);
+ error(_("you need to resolve your current index first"));
+ return 1;
+ }
+@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
ret = unpack_trees(2, trees, &topts);
clear_unpack_trees_porcelain(&topts);
-- if (ret == -1) {
+ if (ret == -1) {
- /*
- * Unpack couldn't do a trivial merge; either
- * give up or do a real merge, depending on
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *op
- strbuf_release(&old_commit_shortname);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-- }
-+ if (ret == -1)
++ rollback_lock_file(&lock_file);
+ return 1;
+ }
}
- if (!cache_tree_fully_valid(the_repository->index->cache_tree))
-@@ builtin/checkout.c: static void orphaned_commit_warning(struct commit *old_commit, struct commit *ne
- release_revisions(&revs);
- }
-
-+static int checkout_would_clobber_changes(struct branch_info *old_branch_info,
-+ struct branch_info *new_branch_info)
-+{
-+ struct tree_desc trees[2];
-+ struct tree *old_tree, *new_tree;
-+ struct unpack_trees_options topts;
-+ struct index_state tmp_index = INDEX_STATE_INIT(the_repository);
-+ const struct object_id *old_commit_oid;
-+ int ret;
-+
-+ if (!new_branch_info->commit)
-+ return 0;
-+
-+ old_commit_oid = old_branch_info->commit ?
-+ &old_branch_info->commit->object.oid :
-+ the_hash_algo->empty_tree;
-+ old_tree = repo_parse_tree_indirect(the_repository, old_commit_oid);
-+ if (!old_tree)
-+ return 0;
-+
-+ new_tree = repo_get_commit_tree(the_repository,
-+ new_branch_info->commit);
-+ if (!new_tree)
-+ return 0;
-+ if (repo_parse_tree(the_repository, new_tree) < 0)
-+ return 0;
-+
-+ memset(&topts, 0, sizeof(topts));
-+ topts.head_idx = -1;
-+ topts.src_index = the_repository->index;
-+ topts.dst_index = &tmp_index;
-+ topts.initial_checkout = is_index_unborn(the_repository->index);
-+ topts.merge = 1;
-+ topts.update = 1;
-+ topts.dry_run = 1;
-+ topts.quiet = 1;
-+ topts.fn = twoway_merge;
-+
-+ init_tree_desc(&trees[0], &old_tree->object.oid,
-+ old_tree->buffer, old_tree->size);
-+ init_tree_desc(&trees[1], &new_tree->object.oid,
-+ new_tree->buffer, new_tree->size);
-+
-+ ret = unpack_trees(2, trees, &topts);
-+ discard_index(&tmp_index);
-+
-+ return ret != 0;
-+}
-+
- static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
- struct branch_info *new_branch_info)
- {
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
struct object_id rev;
int flag, writeout_error = 0;
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
+ stash_label_ancestor = old_commit_shortname.buf;
+ }
+
-+ if (opts->merge) {
-+ if (repo_read_index(the_repository) < 0)
-+ die(_("index file corrupt"));
-+ if (checkout_would_clobber_changes(&old_branch_info,
-+ new_branch_info)) {
+ if (do_merge) {
+ ret = merge_working_tree(opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info, &writeout_error);
++ if (ret && opts->merge) {
+ create_autostash_ref_silent(the_repository,
+ "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH");
+ created_autostash = 1;
++ ret = merge_working_tree(opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info, &writeout_error);
+ }
-+ }
-+
- if (do_merge) {
- ret = merge_working_tree(opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info, &writeout_error);
if (ret) {
+ apply_autostash_ref_with_labels(the_repository,
+ "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH",Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v6 1/4 stash: add --ours-label, --theirs-label, --base-label for apply
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Allow callers of "git stash apply" to pass custom labels for conflict markers instead of the default "Updated upstream" and "Stashed changes". Document the new options and add a test.
--- Documentation/git-stash.adoc | 11 ++++++++++- builtin/stash.c | 2 +- t/t3903-stash.sh | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-stash.adoc +10 -1
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ git stash list [<log-options>] git stash show [-u | --include-untracked | --only-untracked] [<diff-options>] [<stash>] git stash drop [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] git stash pop [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] -git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] +git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--ours-label=<label>] [--theirs-label=<label>] [--base-label=<label>] [<stash>] git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>] git stash [push [-p | --patch] [-S | --staged] [-k | --[no-]keep-index] [-q | --quiet] [-u | --include-untracked] [-a | --all] [(-m | --message) <message>]
@@ -197,6 +197,15 @@ the index's ones. However, this can fail, when you have conflicts (which are stored in the index, where you therefore can no longer apply the changes as they were originally). +`--ours-label=<label>`:: +`--theirs-label=<label>`:: +`--base-label=<label>`:: + These options are only valid for the `apply` command. ++ +Use the given labels in conflict markers instead of the default +"Updated upstream", "Stashed changes", and "Stash base". +`--base-label` only has an effect with merge.conflictStyle=diff3. + `-k`:: `--keep-index`:: `--no-keep-index`::
builtin/stash.c +1 -1
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@#define BUILTIN_STASH_POP_USAGE \ N_("git stash pop [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_APPLY_USAGE \ - N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]") + N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--ours-label=<label>] [--theirs-label=<label>] [--base-label=<label>] [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_BRANCH_USAGE \ N_("git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_STORE_USAGE \
t/t3903-stash.sh +18 -0
@@ -1666,6 +1666,24 @@ test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' ' ) ' +test_expect_success 'apply with custom conflict labels' ' + git init conflict_labels && + ( + cd conflict_labels && + echo base >file && + git add file && + git commit -m base && + echo stashed >file && + git stash push -m "stashed" && + echo upstream >file && + git add file && + git commit -m upstream && + test_must_fail git stash apply --ours-label=UP --theirs-label=STASH && + grep "^<<<<<<< UP" file && + grep "^>>>>>>> STASH" file + ) +' + test_expect_success 'stash create reports a locked index' ' test_when_finished "rm -rf repo" && git init repo &&
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v6 2/4 sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add a silent parameter to create_autostash_internal and introduce create_autostash_ref_silent so that callers can create an autostash without printing the "Created autostash" message. Use stderr for the message when not silent.
--- sequencer.c | 15 +++++++++++---- sequencer.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
sequencer.c +11 -4
@@ -4632,7 +4632,8 @@ static enum todo_command peek_command(struct todo_list *todo_list, int offset)static void create_autostash_internal (struct repository *r,const char *path, -const char *refname) +const char *refname, +int silent) {struct strbuf buf =STRBUF_INIT ;struct lock_file lock_file =LOCK_INIT ;
@@ -4677,7 +4678,8 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r, &oid, null_oid(the_hash_algo), 0, UPDATE_REFS_DIE_ON_ERR); } -printf (_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf); +if (!silent) +fprintf (stderr,_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf);if (reset_head (r, &ropts) <0 )die (_ ("could not reset --hard" ));discard_index (r->index);
@@ -4689,12 +4691,17 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path) { -create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL ); +create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL ,0 ); }void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname); +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname,0 ); +} + +void create_autostash_ref_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname) +{ +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname,1 ); }static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply)
sequencer.h +1 -0
@@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ void commit_post_rewrite(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path);void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +void create_autostash_ref_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int save_autostash (const char *path);int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v6 3/4 sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add label1, label2, and label_ancestor parameters to the autostash apply machinery so callers can pass custom conflict marker labels through to "git stash apply --ours-label/--theirs-label/--base-label". Introduce apply_autostash_ref_with_labels() for callers that want to pass labels.
--- sequencer.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- sequencer.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
sequencer.c +27 -7
@@ -4704,7 +4704,9 @@ void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname)create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname,1 ); } -static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply) +static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply, +const char *label1,const char *label2, +const char *label_ancestor) {struct child_process child =CHILD_PROCESS_INIT ;int ret =0 ;
@@ -4715,6 +4717,12 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply) child.no_stderr =1 ;strvec_push (&child.args,"stash" );strvec_push (&child.args,"apply" ); +if (label1) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--ours-label=%s" , label1); +if (label2) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--theirs-label=%s" , label2); +if (label_ancestor) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--base-label=%s" , label_ancestor);strvec_push (&child.args, stash_oid); ret =run_command (&child); }
@@ -4759,7 +4767,8 @@ static int apply_save_autostash(const char *path, int attempt_apply) }strbuf_trim (&stash_oid); - ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply); + ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply, +NULL ,NULL ,NULL );unlink (path);strbuf_release (&stash_oid);
@@ -4778,11 +4787,13 @@ int apply_autostash(const char *path)int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid) { -return apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid,1 ); +return apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid,1 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); }static int apply_save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname, -int attempt_apply) +int attempt_apply, +const char *label1,const char *label2, +const char *label_ancestor) {struct object_id stash_oid;char stash_oid_hex[GIT_MAX_HEXSZ +1 ];
@@ -4798,7 +4809,8 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,return error (_ ("autostash reference is a symref" ));oid_to_hex_r (stash_oid_hex, &stash_oid); - ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply); + ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply, + label1, label2, label_ancestor);refs_delete_ref (get_main_ref_store (r),"" , refname, &stash_oid,REF_NO_DEREF );
@@ -4808,12 +4820,20 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,0 ); +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,0 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); }int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 ); +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); +} + +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label1,const char *label2, +const char *label_ancestor) +{ +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 , + label1, label2, label_ancestor); } static int checkout_onto(struct repository *r, struct replay_opts *opts,
sequencer.h +3 -0
@@ -233,6 +233,9 @@ int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid);int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label1,const char *label2, +const char *label_ancestor);#define SUMMARY_INITIAL_COMMIT (1 << 0)#define SUMMARY_SHOW_AUTHOR_DATE (1 << 1)
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v6 4/4 checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
When switching branches with "git checkout -m", local modifications can block the switch. Teach the -m flow to create a temporary stash before switching and reapply it after. On success, only "Applied autostash." is shown. If reapplying causes conflicts, the stash is kept and the user is told they can resolve and run "git stash drop", or run "git reset --hard" and later "git stash pop" to recover their changes.
--- Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 58 ++++++------ Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 27 +++--- builtin/checkout.c | 137 ++++++++++++--------------- builtin/stash.c | 30 ++++-- sequencer.c | 18 +++- t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh | 24 +++-- t/t7201-co.sh | 160 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t7600-merge.sh | 2 +- xdiff-interface.c | 12 +++ xdiff-interface.h | 1 + 10 files changed, 332 insertions(+), 137 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +31 -27
@@ -251,20 +251,19 @@ working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc. are different between the current branch and the branch to which you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in order to preserve your modifications in context. - However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current - branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch - is done, and you will be on the new branch. -+ -When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting -paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge -should result in deletion of the path). + With this option, the conflicting local changes are + automatically stashed before the switch and reapplied + afterwards. If the local changes do not overlap with the + differences between branches, the switch proceeds without + stashing. If reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the + entry is saved to the stash list. Resolve the conflicts + and run `git stash drop` when done, or clear the working + tree (e.g. with `git reset --hard`) before running `git stash + pop` later to re-apply your changes. + When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate the conflicted merge in the specified paths. This option cannot be used when checking out paths from a tree-ish. -+ -When switching branches with `--merge`, staged changes may be lost. `--conflict=<style>`:: The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
@@ -578,39 +577,44 @@ $ git checkout mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a -three-way merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would carry your local +changes to the new branch: ------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Switched to branch 'mytopic' ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch. === 3. Merge conflict -When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with -the `-m` option, you would see something like this: +When the `--merge` (`-m`) option is in effect and the locally +modified files overlap with files that need to be updated by the +branch switch, the changes are stashed and reapplied after the +switch. If the stash application results in conflicts, they are not +resolved and the stash is saved to the stash list: ------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz -ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz -fatal: merge program failed ------------- +Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry +forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: -At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in -the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted -files. Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with -`git add` as usual: + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. ------------ -$ edit frotz -$ git add frotz ------------- + +You can try resolving the conflicts now. Edit the conflicting files +and mark them resolved with `git add` as usual, then run `git stash +drop` to discard the stash entry. Alternatively, you can clear the +working tree with `git reset --hard` and recover your local changes +later with `git stash pop`. CONFIGURATION -------------
Documentation/git-switch.adoc +14 -13
@@ -126,15 +126,16 @@ variable. If you have local modifications to one or more files that are different between the current branch and the branch to which you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in - order to preserve your modifications in context. However, - with this option, a three-way merge between the current - branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch is - done, and you will be on the new branch. -+ -When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting -paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge -should result in deletion of the path). + order to preserve your modifications in context. With this + option, the conflicting local changes are automatically + stashed before the switch and reapplied afterwards. If the + local changes do not overlap with the differences between + branches, the switch proceeds without stashing. If + reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the entry is + saved to the stash list. Resolve the conflicts and run + `git stash drop` when done, or clear the working tree + (e.g. with `git reset --hard`) before running `git stash pop` + later to re-apply your changes. `--conflict=<style>`:: The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
@@ -217,15 +218,15 @@ $ git switch mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a three-way -merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would carry your local +changes to the new branch: ------------ $ git switch -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Switched to branch 'mytopic' ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
builtin/checkout.c +58 -79
204 lines not on this page · raw message
builtin/stash.c +24 -6
@@ -590,8 +590,11 @@ static void unstage_changes_unless_new(struct object_id *orig_tree)die (_ ("could not write index" )); } -static int do_apply_stash (const char *prefix,struct stash_info *info, -int index,int quiet) +static int do_apply_stash_with_labels (const char *prefix, +struct stash_info *info, +int index,int quiet, +const char *label1,const char *label2, +const char *label_ancestor) {int clean, ret;int has_index = index;
@@ -643,9 +646,9 @@ static int do_apply_stash(const char *prefix, struct stash_info *info,init_ui_merge_options (&o, the_repository); - o.branch1 ="Updated upstream" ; - o.branch2 ="Stashed changes" ; - o.ancestor ="Stash base" ; + o.branch1 = label1 ? label1 :"Updated upstream" ; + o.branch2 = label2 ? label2 :"Stashed changes" ; + o.ancestor = label_ancestor ? label_ancestor :"Stash base" ;if (oideq (&info->b_tree, &c_tree)) o.branch1 ="Version stash was based on" ;
@@ -717,17 +720,31 @@ restore_untracked:return ret; } +static int do_apply_stash (const char *prefix,struct stash_info *info, +int index,int quiet) +{ +return do_apply_stash_with_labels (prefix, info, index, quiet, +NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); +} +static int apply_stash (int argc,const char **argv,const char *prefix, struct repository *repo UNUSED) {int ret =-1 ;int quiet =0 ;int index = use_index; +const char *label1 =NULL , *label2 =NULL , *label_ancestor =NULL ;struct stash_info info =STASH_INFO_INIT ;struct option options[] = {OPT__QUIET (&quiet,N_ ("be quiet, only report errors" )),OPT_BOOL (0 ,"index" , &index,N_ ("attempt to recreate the index" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"ours-label" , &label1,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the upstream side in conflict markers" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"theirs-label" , &label2,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the stashed side in conflict markers" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"base-label" , &label_ancestor,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the base in diff3 conflict markers" )),OPT_END () };
@@ -737,7 +754,8 @@ static int apply_stash(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,if (get_stash_info (&info, argc, argv)) goto cleanup; - ret =do_apply_stash (prefix, &info, index, quiet); + ret =do_apply_stash_with_labels (prefix, &info, index, quiet, + label1, label2, label_ancestor); cleanup:free_stash_info (&info);return ret;
sequencer.c +13 -5
@@ -4741,15 +4741,23 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply,strvec_push (&store.args, stash_oid);if (run_command (&store)) ret =error (_ ("cannot store %s" ), stash_oid); +else if (attempt_apply) +fprintf (stderr, +_ ("Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry\n" +"forward your local changes resulted in conflicts:\n" +"\n" +" - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them\n" +" successfully, discard the stash entry with \"git stash drop\".\n" +"\n" +" - Alternatively you can \"git reset --hard\" if you do not want\n" +" to deal with them right now, and later \"git stash pop\" to\n" +" recover your local changes.\n" ));else fprintf (stderr, -_ ("%s\n" +_ ("Autostash exists; creating a new stash entry.\n" "Your changes are safe in the stash.\n" "You can run \"git stash pop\" or" -" \"git stash drop\" at any time.\n" ), - attempt_apply ? -_ ("Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." ) : -_ ("Autostash exists; creating a new stash entry." )); +" \"git stash drop\" at any time.\n" )); }return ret;
t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh +18 -6
@@ -61,18 +61,30 @@ create_expected_failure_apply () { First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... Applying: second commit Applying: third commit - Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. - Your changes are safe in the stash. - You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. + Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry + forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: + + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. EOF } create_expected_failure_merge () { cat >expected <<-EOF $(grep "^Created autostash: [0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*\$" actual) - Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. - Your changes are safe in the stash. - You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. + Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry + forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: + + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/rebased-feature-branch. EOF }
t/t7201-co.sh +160 -0
166 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t7600-merge.sh +1 -1
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ test_expect_success 'merge with conflicted --autostash changes' ' git diff >expect && test_when_finished "test_might_fail git stash drop" && git merge --autostash c3 2>err && - test_grep "Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." err && + test_grep "your local changes resulted in conflicts" err && git show HEAD:file >merge-result && test_cmp result.1-9 merge-result && git stash show -p >actual &&
xdiff-interface.c +12 -0
@@ -325,6 +325,18 @@ int parse_conflict_style_name(const char *value)return -1 ; } +const char *conflict_style_name (int style) +{ +switch (style) { +case XDL_MERGE_DIFF3 : +return "diff3" ; +case XDL_MERGE_ZEALOUS_DIFF3 : +return "zdiff3" ; +default : +return "merge" ; + } +} +int git_xmerge_style =-1 ; int git_xmerge_config(const char *var, const char *value,
xdiff-interface.h +1 -0
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ void xdiff_set_find_func(xdemitconf_t *xecfg, const char *line, int cflags);void xdiff_clear_find_func (xdemitconf_t *xecfg);struct config_context ;int parse_conflict_style_name (const char *value); +const char *conflict_style_name (int style);int git_xmerge_config (const char *var,const char *value,const struct config_context *ctx,void *cb);extern int git_xmerge_style;
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
v7 cover checkout: 'autostash' for branch switching
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetHarald Nordgren (4):
stash: add --ours-label, --theirs-label, --base-label for apply
sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker
labels
checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 58 +++++----- Documentation/git-stash.adoc | 11 +- Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 27 ++--- builtin/checkout.c | 138 ++++++++++------------- builtin/stash.c | 32 ++++-- sequencer.c | 67 +++++++++--- sequencer.h | 4 + t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh | 24 +++- t/t3903-stash.sh | 18 +++ t/t7201-co.sh | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t7600-merge.sh | 2 +- xdiff-interface.c | 12 ++ xdiff-interface.h | 1 + 13 files changed, 431 insertions(+), 151 deletions(-)
base-commit: b15384c06f77bc2d34d0d3623a8a58218313a561
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-2234%2FHaraldNordgren%2Fcheckout_autostash-v7
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-2234/HaraldNordgren/checkout_autostash-v7
Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/2234
Range-diff vs v6:
1: cd9c64ba60 ! 1: 284075600a stash: add --ours-label, --theirs-label, --base-label for apply
@@ Documentation/git-stash.adoc: git stash list [<log-options>]
-git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]
+git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--ours-label=<label>] [--theirs-label=<label>] [--base-label=<label>] [<stash>]
git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>]
- git stash [push [-p | --patch] [-S | --staged] [-k | --[no-]keep-index] [-q | --quiet]
+ git stash [push] [-p | --patch] [-S | --staged] [-k | --[no-]keep-index] [-q | --quiet]
[-u | --include-untracked] [-a | --all] [(-m | --message) <message>]
@@ Documentation/git-stash.adoc: the index's ones. However, this can fail, when you have conflicts
(which are stored in the index, where you therefore can no longer
2: d572c4bb7d = 2: 64261e3cb6 sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
3: 80a98116fc = 3: c0d6b4b4c0 sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels
4: 7ecb0835b7 ! 4: 1c29e19971 checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *op
- 0, 0);
- init_ui_merge_options(&o, the_repository);
- o.verbosity = 0;
-- work = write_in_core_index_as_tree(the_repository);
+- work = write_in_core_index_as_tree(the_repository,
+- the_repository->index);
-
- ret = reset_tree(new_tree,
- opts, 1,
@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>'
+ git reset --hard
+'
+
++test_expect_success 'checkout -m applies stash cleanly with non-overlapping changes in same file' '
++ git checkout -f main &&
++ git reset --hard &&
++ git clean -f &&
++
++ git checkout -b nonoverlap_base &&
++ fill a b c d >file &&
++ git add file &&
++ git commit -m "add file" &&
++
++ git checkout -b nonoverlap_child &&
++ fill a b c INSERTED d >file &&
++ git commit -a -m "insert line near end of file" &&
++
++ fill DIRTY a b c INSERTED d >file &&
++
++ git checkout -m nonoverlap_base 2>stderr &&
++ test_grep "Applied autostash" stderr &&
++ test_grep ! "resulted in conflicts" stderr &&
++
++ fill DIRTY a b c d >expect &&
++ test_cmp expect file &&
++
++ git checkout -f main &&
++ git branch -D nonoverlap_base &&
++ git branch -D nonoverlap_child
++'
++
+test_expect_success 'checkout -m -b skips stash with dirty tree' '
+ git checkout -f main &&
+ git clean -f &&Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v7 1/4 stash: add --ours-label, --theirs-label, --base-label for apply
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Allow callers of "git stash apply" to pass custom labels for conflict markers instead of the default "Updated upstream" and "Stashed changes". Document the new options and add a test.
--- Documentation/git-stash.adoc | 11 ++++++++++- builtin/stash.c | 2 +- t/t3903-stash.sh | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-stash.adoc +10 -1
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ git stash list [<log-options>] git stash show [-u | --include-untracked | --only-untracked] [<diff-options>] [<stash>] git stash drop [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] git stash pop [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] -git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] +git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--ours-label=<label>] [--theirs-label=<label>] [--base-label=<label>] [<stash>] git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>] git stash [push] [-p | --patch] [-S | --staged] [-k | --[no-]keep-index] [-q | --quiet] [-u | --include-untracked] [-a | --all] [(-m | --message) <message>]
@@ -195,6 +195,15 @@ the index's ones. However, this can fail, when you have conflicts (which are stored in the index, where you therefore can no longer apply the changes as they were originally). +`--ours-label=<label>`:: +`--theirs-label=<label>`:: +`--base-label=<label>`:: + These options are only valid for the `apply` command. ++ +Use the given labels in conflict markers instead of the default +"Updated upstream", "Stashed changes", and "Stash base". +`--base-label` only has an effect with merge.conflictStyle=diff3. + `-k`:: `--keep-index`:: `--no-keep-index`::
builtin/stash.c +1 -1
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@#define BUILTIN_STASH_POP_USAGE \ N_("git stash pop [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_APPLY_USAGE \ - N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]") + N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--ours-label=<label>] [--theirs-label=<label>] [--base-label=<label>] [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_BRANCH_USAGE \ N_("git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_STORE_USAGE \
t/t3903-stash.sh +18 -0
@@ -1666,6 +1666,24 @@ test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' ' ) ' +test_expect_success 'apply with custom conflict labels' ' + git init conflict_labels && + ( + cd conflict_labels && + echo base >file && + git add file && + git commit -m base && + echo stashed >file && + git stash push -m "stashed" && + echo upstream >file && + git add file && + git commit -m upstream && + test_must_fail git stash apply --ours-label=UP --theirs-label=STASH && + grep "^<<<<<<< UP" file && + grep "^>>>>>>> STASH" file + ) +' + test_expect_success 'stash create reports a locked index' ' test_when_finished "rm -rf repo" && git init repo &&
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] stash: add --ours-label, --theirs-label, --base-label for apply
Quoted 70 lines · Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Allow callers of "git stash apply" to pass custom labels for conflict markers instead of the default "Updated upstream" and "Stashed changes". Document the new options and add a test.
Signed-off-by Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>--- Documentation/git-stash.adoc | 11 ++++++++++- builtin/stash.c | 2 +- t/t3903-stash.sh | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)Documentation/git-stash.adoc +10
-1@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ git stash list [<log-options>] git stash show [-u | --include-untracked | --only-untracked] [<diff-options>] [<stash>] git stash drop [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] git stash pop [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] -git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] +git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--ours-label=<label>] [--theirs-label=<label>] [--base-label=<label>] [<stash>] git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>] git stash [push] [-p | --patch] [-S | --staged] [-k | --[no-]keep-index] [-q | --quiet] [-u | --include-untracked] [-a | --all] [(-m | --message) <message>]@@ -195,6 +195,15 @@ the index's ones. However, this can fail, when you have conflicts (which are stored in the index, where you therefore can no longer apply the changes as they were originally). +`--ours-label=<label>`:: +`--theirs-label=<label>`:: +`--base-label=<label>`:: + These options are only valid for the `apply` command. ++ +Use the given labels in conflict markers instead of the default +"Updated upstream", "Stashed changes", and "Stash base". +`--base-label` only has an effect with merge.conflictStyle=diff3. + `-k`:: `--keep-index`:: `--no-keep-index`::builtin/stash.c +1
-1@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@#define BUILTIN_STASH_POP_USAGE \ N_("git stash pop [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_APPLY_USAGE \ - N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]") + N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--ours-label=<label>] [--theirs-label=<label>] [--base-label=<label>] [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_BRANCH_USAGE \ N_("git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_STORE_USAGE \t/t3903-stash.sh +7
-0@@ -1666,6 +1666,24 @@ test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' ' ) ' +test_expect_success 'apply with custom conflict labels' ' + git init conflict_labels && + ( + cd conflict_labels && + echo base >file && + git add file && + git commit -m base &&
t/t3903-stash.sh test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' ' · line 1685
Quoted 10 lines
t/t3903-stash.sh +10
-0+ echo stashed >file && + git stash push -m "stashed" && + echo upstream >file && + git add file && + git commit -m upstream && + test_must_fail git stash apply --ours-label=UP --theirs-label=STASH && + grep "^<<<<<<< UP" file && + grep "^>>>>>>> STASH" file + ) +'
Two and a half things I noticed.
* use "test_grep" to validate the result, like you did in other patches to the tests. t3903 is rather old and has uses of raw "grep" but majority of the tests should already be using test_grep.
* Not validating the base line is a bit unexpected. Even without giving --base-label to the "stash apply" command, we could make sure that the output says "|||||||" (and nothing else) for the base label.
* When these labels are set to an empty string, I think we should refrain from adding a trailing " " after these marker characters. Should we add a test case for that, e.g.
test_must_fail git stash apply --ours-l= --theirs-l= && test_grep "^<<<<<<<$" file && test_grep "^>>>>>>>$" file
Quoted 3 lines
t/t3903-stash.sh +0
-0test_expect_success 'stash create reports a locked index' ' test_when_finished "rm -rf repo" && git init repo &&
Quoted 12 lines
Two and a half things I noticed.
* use "
test_grep" to validate the result, like you did in other patches to the tests. t3903 is rather old and has uses of raw "grep" but majority of the tests should already be usingtest_grep.* Not validating the base line is a bit unexpected. Even without giving --base-label to the "stash apply" command, we could make sure that the output says "|||||||" (and nothing else) for the base label.
Quoted 7 lines
* When these labels are set to an empty string, I think we should refrain from adding a trailing " " after these marker characters. Should we add a test case for that, e.g.
test_must_fail git stash apply --ours-l= --theirs-l= && test_grep "^<<<<<<<$" file && test_grep "^>>>>>>>$" file
Fixed, thanks!
Harald
PATCH v7 2/4 sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add a silent parameter to create_autostash_internal and introduce create_autostash_ref_silent so that callers can create an autostash without printing the "Created autostash" message. Use stderr for the message when not silent.
--- sequencer.c | 15 +++++++++++---- sequencer.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
sequencer.c +11 -4
@@ -4657,7 +4657,8 @@ static enum todo_command peek_command(struct todo_list *todo_list, int offset)static void create_autostash_internal (struct repository *r,const char *path, -const char *refname) +const char *refname, +int silent) {struct strbuf buf =STRBUF_INIT ;struct lock_file lock_file =LOCK_INIT ;
@@ -4702,7 +4703,8 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r, &oid, null_oid(the_hash_algo), 0, UPDATE_REFS_DIE_ON_ERR); } -printf (_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf); +if (!silent) +fprintf (stderr,_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf);if (reset_head (r, &ropts) <0 )die (_ ("could not reset --hard" ));discard_index (r->index);
@@ -4714,12 +4716,17 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path) { -create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL ); +create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL ,0 ); }void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname); +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname,0 ); +} + +void create_autostash_ref_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname) +{ +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname,1 ); }static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply)
sequencer.h +1 -0
@@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ void commit_post_rewrite(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path);void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +void create_autostash_ref_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int save_autostash (const char *path);int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v7 3/4 sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add label1, label2, and label_ancestor parameters to the autostash apply machinery so callers can pass custom conflict marker labels through to "git stash apply --ours-label/--theirs-label/--base-label". Introduce apply_autostash_ref_with_labels() for callers that want to pass labels.
--- sequencer.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- sequencer.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
sequencer.c +27 -7
@@ -4729,7 +4729,9 @@ void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname)create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname,1 ); } -static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply) +static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply, +const char *label1,const char *label2, +const char *label_ancestor) {struct child_process child =CHILD_PROCESS_INIT ;int ret =0 ;
@@ -4740,6 +4742,12 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply) child.no_stderr =1 ;strvec_push (&child.args,"stash" );strvec_push (&child.args,"apply" ); +if (label1) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--ours-label=%s" , label1); +if (label2) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--theirs-label=%s" , label2); +if (label_ancestor) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--base-label=%s" , label_ancestor);strvec_push (&child.args, stash_oid); ret =run_command (&child); }
@@ -4784,7 +4792,8 @@ static int apply_save_autostash(const char *path, int attempt_apply) }strbuf_trim (&stash_oid); - ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply); + ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply, +NULL ,NULL ,NULL );unlink (path);strbuf_release (&stash_oid);
@@ -4803,11 +4812,13 @@ int apply_autostash(const char *path)int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid) { -return apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid,1 ); +return apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid,1 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); }static int apply_save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname, -int attempt_apply) +int attempt_apply, +const char *label1,const char *label2, +const char *label_ancestor) {struct object_id stash_oid;char stash_oid_hex[GIT_MAX_HEXSZ +1 ];
@@ -4823,7 +4834,8 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,return error (_ ("autostash reference is a symref" ));oid_to_hex_r (stash_oid_hex, &stash_oid); - ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply); + ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply, + label1, label2, label_ancestor);refs_delete_ref (get_main_ref_store (r),"" , refname, &stash_oid,REF_NO_DEREF );
@@ -4833,12 +4845,20 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,0 ); +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,0 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); }int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 ); +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); +} + +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label1,const char *label2, +const char *label_ancestor) +{ +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 , + label1, label2, label_ancestor); } static int checkout_onto(struct repository *r, struct replay_opts *opts,
sequencer.h +3 -0
@@ -236,6 +236,9 @@ int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid);int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label1,const char *label2, +const char *label_ancestor);#define SUMMARY_INITIAL_COMMIT (1 << 0)#define SUMMARY_SHOW_AUTHOR_DATE (1 << 1)
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels
Quoted 7 lines · Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add label1, label2, and
label_ancestorparameters to the autostash apply machinery so callers can pass custom conflict marker labels through to "git stash apply --ours-label/--theirs-label/--base-label". Introduceapply_autostash_ref_with_labels()for callers that want to pass labels.
It is just a naming thing, but the contrast between label[12] vs label_ancestor feel a bit uneven. Wouldn't it make it easier to grok a hunk like this, if you stick to ours/theirs/base terminlogy?
sequencer.c static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply) · line 4750
Quoted 6 lines
sequencer.c +6
-0+if (label1) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--ours-label=%s" , label1); +if (label2) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--theirs-label=%s" , label2); +if (label_ancestor) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--base-label=%s" , label_ancestor);
Alternatively, if you prefer a conciseness of numbered names, it is customary to use "1" for the common ancestor, "2" for ours, and "3" for theirs, following the same model after how higher stage index entries are used during a conflicting merge.
Other than that, this step is quite straight-forward and looking good.
Quoted 3 lines
It is just a naming thing, but the contrast between label[12] vs
label_ancestorfeel a bit uneven. Wouldn't it make it easier to grok a hunk like this, if you stick to ours/theirs/base terminlogy?
Fixed!
Harald
PATCH v7 4/4 checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
When switching branches with "git checkout -m", local modifications can block the switch. Teach the -m flow to create a temporary stash before switching and reapply it after. On success, only "Applied autostash." is shown. If reapplying causes conflicts, the stash is kept and the user is told they can resolve and run "git stash drop", or run "git reset --hard" and later "git stash pop" to recover their changes.
--- Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 58 +++++----- Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 27 ++--- builtin/checkout.c | 138 ++++++++++------------- builtin/stash.c | 30 ++++- sequencer.c | 18 ++- t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh | 24 +++- t/t7201-co.sh | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t7600-merge.sh | 2 +- xdiff-interface.c | 12 ++ xdiff-interface.h | 1 + 10 files changed, 360 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +31 -27
@@ -251,20 +251,19 @@ working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc. are different between the current branch and the branch to which you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in order to preserve your modifications in context. - However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current - branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch - is done, and you will be on the new branch. -+ -When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting -paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge -should result in deletion of the path). + With this option, the conflicting local changes are + automatically stashed before the switch and reapplied + afterwards. If the local changes do not overlap with the + differences between branches, the switch proceeds without + stashing. If reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the + entry is saved to the stash list. Resolve the conflicts + and run `git stash drop` when done, or clear the working + tree (e.g. with `git reset --hard`) before running `git stash + pop` later to re-apply your changes. + When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate the conflicted merge in the specified paths. This option cannot be used when checking out paths from a tree-ish. -+ -When switching branches with `--merge`, staged changes may be lost. `--conflict=<style>`:: The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
@@ -578,39 +577,44 @@ $ git checkout mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a -three-way merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would carry your local +changes to the new branch: ------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Switched to branch 'mytopic' ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch. === 3. Merge conflict -When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with -the `-m` option, you would see something like this: +When the `--merge` (`-m`) option is in effect and the locally +modified files overlap with files that need to be updated by the +branch switch, the changes are stashed and reapplied after the +switch. If the stash application results in conflicts, they are not +resolved and the stash is saved to the stash list: ------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz -ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz -fatal: merge program failed ------------- +Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry +forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: -At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in -the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted -files. Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with -`git add` as usual: + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. ------------ -$ edit frotz -$ git add frotz ------------- + +You can try resolving the conflicts now. Edit the conflicting files +and mark them resolved with `git add` as usual, then run `git stash +drop` to discard the stash entry. Alternatively, you can clear the +working tree with `git reset --hard` and recover your local changes +later with `git stash pop`. CONFIGURATION -------------
Documentation/git-switch.adoc +14 -13
@@ -126,15 +126,16 @@ variable. If you have local modifications to one or more files that are different between the current branch and the branch to which you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in - order to preserve your modifications in context. However, - with this option, a three-way merge between the current - branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch is - done, and you will be on the new branch. -+ -When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting -paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge -should result in deletion of the path). + order to preserve your modifications in context. With this + option, the conflicting local changes are automatically + stashed before the switch and reapplied afterwards. If the + local changes do not overlap with the differences between + branches, the switch proceeds without stashing. If + reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the entry is + saved to the stash list. Resolve the conflicts and run + `git stash drop` when done, or clear the working tree + (e.g. with `git reset --hard`) before running `git stash pop` + later to re-apply your changes. `--conflict=<style>`:: The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
@@ -217,15 +218,15 @@ $ git switch mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a three-way -merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would carry your local +changes to the new branch: ------------ $ git switch -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Switched to branch 'mytopic' ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
builtin/checkout.c +58 -80
205 lines not on this page · raw message
builtin/stash.c +24 -6
@@ -590,8 +590,11 @@ static void unstage_changes_unless_new(struct object_id *orig_tree)die (_ ("could not write index" )); } -static int do_apply_stash (const char *prefix,struct stash_info *info, -int index,int quiet) +static int do_apply_stash_with_labels (const char *prefix, +struct stash_info *info, +int index,int quiet, +const char *label1,const char *label2, +const char *label_ancestor) {int clean, ret;int has_index = index;
@@ -643,9 +646,9 @@ static int do_apply_stash(const char *prefix, struct stash_info *info,init_ui_merge_options (&o, the_repository); - o.branch1 ="Updated upstream" ; - o.branch2 ="Stashed changes" ; - o.ancestor ="Stash base" ; + o.branch1 = label1 ? label1 :"Updated upstream" ; + o.branch2 = label2 ? label2 :"Stashed changes" ; + o.ancestor = label_ancestor ? label_ancestor :"Stash base" ;if (oideq (&info->b_tree, &c_tree)) o.branch1 ="Version stash was based on" ;
@@ -717,17 +720,31 @@ restore_untracked:return ret; } +static int do_apply_stash (const char *prefix,struct stash_info *info, +int index,int quiet) +{ +return do_apply_stash_with_labels (prefix, info, index, quiet, +NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); +} +static int apply_stash (int argc,const char **argv,const char *prefix, struct repository *repo UNUSED) {int ret =-1 ;int quiet =0 ;int index = use_index; +const char *label1 =NULL , *label2 =NULL , *label_ancestor =NULL ;struct stash_info info =STASH_INFO_INIT ;struct option options[] = {OPT__QUIET (&quiet,N_ ("be quiet, only report errors" )),OPT_BOOL (0 ,"index" , &index,N_ ("attempt to recreate the index" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"ours-label" , &label1,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the upstream side in conflict markers" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"theirs-label" , &label2,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the stashed side in conflict markers" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"base-label" , &label_ancestor,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the base in diff3 conflict markers" )),OPT_END () };
@@ -737,7 +754,8 @@ static int apply_stash(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,if (get_stash_info (&info, argc, argv)) goto cleanup; - ret =do_apply_stash (prefix, &info, index, quiet); + ret =do_apply_stash_with_labels (prefix, &info, index, quiet, + label1, label2, label_ancestor); cleanup:free_stash_info (&info);return ret;
sequencer.c +13 -5
@@ -4766,15 +4766,23 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply,strvec_push (&store.args, stash_oid);if (run_command (&store)) ret =error (_ ("cannot store %s" ), stash_oid); +else if (attempt_apply) +fprintf (stderr, +_ ("Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry\n" +"forward your local changes resulted in conflicts:\n" +"\n" +" - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them\n" +" successfully, discard the stash entry with \"git stash drop\".\n" +"\n" +" - Alternatively you can \"git reset --hard\" if you do not want\n" +" to deal with them right now, and later \"git stash pop\" to\n" +" recover your local changes.\n" ));else fprintf (stderr, -_ ("%s\n" +_ ("Autostash exists; creating a new stash entry.\n" "Your changes are safe in the stash.\n" "You can run \"git stash pop\" or" -" \"git stash drop\" at any time.\n" ), - attempt_apply ? -_ ("Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." ) : -_ ("Autostash exists; creating a new stash entry." )); +" \"git stash drop\" at any time.\n" )); }return ret;
t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh +18 -6
@@ -61,18 +61,30 @@ create_expected_failure_apply () { First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... Applying: second commit Applying: third commit - Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. - Your changes are safe in the stash. - You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. + Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry + forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: + + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. EOF } create_expected_failure_merge () { cat >expected <<-EOF $(grep "^Created autostash: [0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*\$" actual) - Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. - Your changes are safe in the stash. - You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. + Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry + forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: + + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/rebased-feature-branch. EOF }
t/t7201-co.sh +188 -0
194 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t7600-merge.sh +1 -1
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ test_expect_success 'merge with conflicted --autostash changes' ' git diff >expect && test_when_finished "test_might_fail git stash drop" && git merge --autostash c3 2>err && - test_grep "Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." err && + test_grep "your local changes resulted in conflicts" err && git show HEAD:file >merge-result && test_cmp result.1-9 merge-result && git stash show -p >actual &&
xdiff-interface.c +12 -0
@@ -325,6 +325,18 @@ int parse_conflict_style_name(const char *value)return -1 ; } +const char *conflict_style_name (int style) +{ +switch (style) { +case XDL_MERGE_DIFF3 : +return "diff3" ; +case XDL_MERGE_ZEALOUS_DIFF3 : +return "zdiff3" ; +default : +return "merge" ; + } +} +int git_xmerge_style =-1 ; int git_xmerge_config(const char *var, const char *value,
xdiff-interface.h +1 -0
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ void xdiff_set_find_func(xdemitconf_t *xecfg, const char *line, int cflags);void xdiff_clear_find_func (xdemitconf_t *xecfg);struct config_context ;int parse_conflict_style_name (const char *value); +const char *conflict_style_name (int style);int git_xmerge_config (const char *var,const char *value,const struct config_context *ctx,void *cb);extern int git_xmerge_style;
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v7 4/4] checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc $ git checkout mytopic · line 598
Quoted 9 lines · Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
=== 3. Merge conflict
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +5
-2-When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with -the `-m` option, you would see something like this: +When the `--merge` (`-m`) option is in effect and the locally +modified files overlap with files that need to be updated by the +branch switch, the changes are stashed and reapplied after the +switch. If the stash application results in conflicts, they are not +resolved and the stash is saved to the stash list:
"results in conflicts, they are not resolved" felt a bit funny thing to say. The definition of resulting in conflicits is to be left with unresolvable conflicts ;-), so ...
... and reapplied after the switch. If this process results in conflicts, a stash entry is saved and made available in "git stash list". This is so that you can revisit it in case if you fail to resolve conflicts correctly.
or something. But reading what you have further down, I think the last sentence "This is so that ..." is probably unnecessary.
Quoted 7 lines
...
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +4
-0+Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry +forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop".
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc $ git checkout mytopic · line 617
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +9
-0+ - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. ------------ + +You can try resolving the conflicts now. Edit the conflicting files +and mark them resolved with `git add` as usual, then run `git stash +drop` to discard the stash entry. Alternatively, you can clear the +working tree with `git reset --hard` and recover your local changes +later with `git stash pop`.
Very well written. I am very happy to see this text.
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/git-switch.adoc +0
-0@@ -126,15 +126,16 @@ variable. If you have local modifications to one or more files that are different between the current branch and the branch to which you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in
Documentation/git-switch.adoc variable. · line 138
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-switch.adoc +10
-0+ order to preserve your modifications in context. With this + option, the conflicting local changes are automatically + stashed before the switch and reapplied afterwards. If the + local changes do not overlap with the differences between + branches, the switch proceeds without stashing. If + reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the entry is + saved to the stash list. Resolve the conflicts and run + `git stash drop` when done, or clear the working tree + (e.g. with `git reset --hard`) before running `git stash pop` + later to re-apply your changes.
We lost "however" but it is OK.
We would want to hint that "The command refuses to" refers to the default behaviour when option being described ("--merge") is not given by some other means, which was what the "however" we lost from the updated text was trying to do.
Documentation/git-switch.adoc $ git switch mytopic · line 222
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/git-switch.adoc +2
-2@@ -217,15 +218,15 @@ $ git switch mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a three-way -merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would carry your local +changes to the new branch:
Yes, saying "carry your local changes to" is much clearer than "try a three-way merge". I very much like this new text.
Documentation/git-switch.adoc $ git switch mytopic · line 231
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/git-switch.adoc +2
-2------------ $ git switch -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Switched to branch 'mytopic' ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
So now to the more exciting part. But there isn't much to comment on, as it stayed the same since a previous iteration where Phillip's excellent "we do not have to waste cycles to dry-run at all" idea.
Quoted 23 lines
t/t7201-co.sh +15
-0@@ -210,6 +210,194 @@ test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>' ' test_cmp expect two ' +test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=zdiff3 <branch>' ' + git checkout -f main && + git reset --hard && + git clean -f && + + fill a b X d e >two && + git checkout --merge --conflict=zdiff3 simple && + + cat <<-EOF >expect && + a + <<<<<<< simple + c + ||||||| main + b + c
t/t7201-co.sh test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>' ' · line 237
Quoted 10 lines
t/t7201-co.sh +10
-0+ d + ======= + b + X + d + >>>>>>> local + e + EOF + test_cmp expect two +'
OK. Do we want to verify with "git stash show -p" or something what we stashed away? I see we later have an explicit test to see that the stash entry can actually be used in "stash pop" after clearing the stage with "checkout -f", so perhaps it is OK to leave it to that test, instead of checking in every step.
t/t7201-co.sh test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>' ' · line 276
Quoted 10 lines
t/t7201-co.sh +10
-0+test_expect_success 'checkout -m skips stash when no conflict' ' + git checkout -f main && + git clean -f && + + fill 0 x y z >same && + git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 && + test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual && + fill 0 x y z >expect && + test_cmp expect same +'
This one may not just check "test_grep !" but also check the output of "git stash list", perhaps take one before and after "checkout -m" and compare them?
t/t7201-co.sh test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>' ' · line 300
Quoted 11 lines
t/t7201-co.sh +11
-0+test_expect_success 'checkout -m stashes and applies on conflicting changes' ' + git checkout -f main && + git clean -f && + + fill 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >one && + git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 && + test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual && + test_grep "Applied autostash" actual && + fill 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >expect && + test_cmp expect one +'
Nice.
Quoted 4 lines
t/t7201-co.sh +4
-0+test_expect_success 'checkout -m stashes on truly conflicting changes' ' + git checkout -f main && + git clean -f && +
t/t7201-co.sh test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>' ' · line 331
Quoted 10 lines
t/t7201-co.sh +10
-0+ fill 1 2 3 4 5 >one && + test_must_fail git checkout side 2>stderr && + test_grep "Your local changes" stderr && + git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 && + test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual && + test_grep "resulted in conflicts" actual && + test_grep "git stash drop" actual && + git stash drop && + git reset --hard +'
OK. This is an emulation of a user who gives up resolving and punts.
t/t7201-co.sh test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>' ' · line 344
Quoted 12 lines
t/t7201-co.sh +12
-0+test_expect_success 'checkout -m produces usable stash on conflict' ' + git checkout -f main && + git clean -f && + + fill 1 2 3 4 5 >one && + git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 && + test_grep "recover your local changes" actual && + git checkout -f main && + git stash pop && + fill 1 2 3 4 5 >expect && + test_cmp expect one +'
Nice.
Quoted 12 lines
t/t7201-co.sh +12
-0+test_expect_success 'checkout -m applies stash cleanly with non-overlapping changes in same file' ' + git checkout -f main && + git reset --hard && + git clean -f && + + git checkout -b nonoverlap_base && + fill a b c d >file && + git add file && + git commit -m "add file" && + + git checkout -b nonoverlap_child && + fill a b c INSERTED d >file &&
t/t7201-co.sh test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>' ' · line 381
Quoted 10 lines
t/t7201-co.sh +10
-0+ git commit -a -m "insert line near end of file" && + + fill DIRTY a b c INSERTED d >file && + + git checkout -m nonoverlap_base 2>stderr && + test_grep "Applied autostash" stderr && + test_grep ! "resulted in conflicts" stderr && + + fill DIRTY a b c d >expect && + test_cmp expect file &&
Should we or should we not see an extra stack entry saved at this point? Don't we want to test it?
t/t7201-co.sh test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>' ' · line 386
Quoted 5 lines
t/t7201-co.sh +5
-0+ + git checkout -f main && + git branch -D nonoverlap_base && + git branch -D nonoverlap_child +'
Overall very nicely done.
Quoted 2 lines
Should we or should we not see an extra stack entry saved at this point? Don't we want to test it?
All of these should be fixed as well. Thanks!
Harald
Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] checkout: 'autostash' for branch switching
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetQuoted 6 lines · Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
Harald Nordgren (4):
stash: add --ours-label, --theirs-label, --base-label for apply
sequencer: allowcreate_autostashto run silently
sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker
labels
checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
Thanks for an update. Above the list of the commits, it would be helpful to give a summary of the overall goal of the topic (which typically stays more or less the same during the life of the topic) and the highlights of the changes since the previous iteration (which authors often accumulate, so that in a cover letter for v7, there will be 6 such summaries), if you are sending a cover letter.
I _think_ the change since v6 is a rebasing onto a more recent 'master', and addition of a new test?
Thanks.
Quoted 81 lines
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 58 +++++----- Documentation/git-stash.adoc | 11 +- Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 27 ++--- builtin/checkout.c | 138 ++++++++++------------- builtin/stash.c | 32 ++++-- sequencer.c | 67 +++++++++--- sequencer.h | 4 + t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh | 24 +++- t/t3903-stash.sh | 18 +++ t/t7201-co.sh | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t7600-merge.sh | 2 +- xdiff-interface.c | 12 ++ xdiff-interface.h | 1 + 13 files changed, 431 insertions(+), 151 deletions(-)base-commit:
b15384c06f77bc2d34d0d3623a8a58218313a561
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-2234%2FHaraldNordgren%2Fcheckout_autostash-v7
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-2234/HaraldNordgren/checkout_autostash-v7
Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/2234Range-diff vs v6:
1:
cd9c64ba60! 1:284075600astash: add --ours-label, --theirs-label, --base-label for apply
@@Documentation/git-stash.adoc: git stash list [<log-options>]
-git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]
+git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--ours-label=<label>] [--theirs-label=<label>] [--base-label=<label>] [<stash>]
git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>]
- git stash [push [-p | --patch] [-S | --staged] [-k | --[no-]keep-index] [-q | --quiet]
+ git stash [push] [-p | --patch] [-S | --staged] [-k | --[no-]keep-index] [-q | --quiet]
[-u | --include-untracked] [-a | --all] [(-m | --message) <message>]
@@Documentation/git-stash.adoc: the index's ones. However, this can fail, when you have conflicts
(which are stored in the index, where you therefore can no longer2: d572c4bb7d = 2: 64261e3cb6 sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently 3: 80a98116fc = 3: c0d6b4b4c0 sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels 4: 7ecb0835b7 ! 4: 1c29e19971 checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches @@ builtin/checkout.c: static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *op - 0, 0); - init_ui_merge_options(&o, the_repository); - o.verbosity = 0; -- work = write_in_core_index_as_tree(the_repository); +- work = write_in_core_index_as_tree(the_repository, +- the_repository->index); - - ret = reset_tree(new_tree, - opts, 1, @@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>' + git reset --hard +' + ++test_expect_success 'checkout -m applies stash cleanly with non-overlapping changes in same file' ' ++ git checkout -f main && ++ git reset --hard && ++ git clean -f && ++ ++ git checkout -b nonoverlap_base && ++ fill a b c d >file && ++ git add file && ++ git commit -m "add file" && ++ ++ git checkout -b nonoverlap_child && ++ fill a b c INSERTED d >file && ++ git commit -a -m "insert line near end of file" && ++ ++ fill DIRTY a b c INSERTED d >file && ++ ++ git checkout -m nonoverlap_base 2>stderr && ++ test_grep "Applied autostash" stderr && ++ test_grep ! "resulted in conflicts" stderr && ++ ++ fill DIRTY a b c d >expect && ++ test_cmp expect file && ++ ++ git checkout -f main && ++ git branch -D nonoverlap_base && ++ git branch -D nonoverlap_child ++' ++ +test_expect_success 'checkout -m -b skips stash with dirty tree' ' + git checkout -f main && + git clean -f &&
Quoted 6 lines
Thanks for an update. Above the list of the commits, it would be helpful to give a summary of the overall goal of the topic (which typically stays more or less the same during the life of the topic) and the highlights of the changes since the previous iteration (which authors often accumulate, so that in a cover letter for v7, there will be 6 such summaries), if you are sending a cover letter.
I'm not exactly sure how to do that with GitGitGadget.
Isn't that what the commit message of the only non-preperatory commit is here?
Harald
v8 cover checkout: 'autostash' for branch switching
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetHarald Nordgren (4):
stash: add --ours-label, --theirs-label, --base-label for apply
sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker
labels
checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 58 +++++----- Documentation/git-stash.adoc | 11 +- Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 33 +++--- builtin/checkout.c | 138 ++++++++++------------ builtin/stash.c | 32 ++++-- sequencer.c | 67 ++++++++--- sequencer.h | 4 + t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh | 24 +++- t/t3903-stash.sh | 37 ++++++ t/t7201-co.sh | 195 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t7600-merge.sh | 2 +- xdiff-interface.c | 12 ++ xdiff-interface.h | 1 + xdiff/xmerge.c | 6 +- 14 files changed, 463 insertions(+), 157 deletions(-)
base-commit: b15384c06f77bc2d34d0d3623a8a58218313a561
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-2234%2FHaraldNordgren%2Fcheckout_autostash-v8
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-2234/HaraldNordgren/checkout_autostash-v8
Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/2234
Range-diff vs v7:
1: 284075600a ! 1: 8fcf377820 stash: add --ours-label, --theirs-label, --base-label for apply
@@ t/t3903-stash.sh: test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit
+ echo upstream >file &&
+ git add file &&
+ git commit -m upstream &&
-+ test_must_fail git stash apply --ours-label=UP --theirs-label=STASH &&
-+ grep "^<<<<<<< UP" file &&
-+ grep "^>>>>>>> STASH" file
++ test_must_fail git -c merge.conflictStyle=diff3 stash apply --ours-label=UP --theirs-label=STASH &&
++ test_grep "^<<<<<<< UP" file &&
++ test_grep "^||||||| Stash base" file &&
++ test_grep "^>>>>>>> STASH" file
++ )
++'
++
++test_expect_success 'apply with empty conflict labels' '
++ git init empty_labels &&
++ (
++ cd empty_labels &&
++ echo base >file &&
++ git add file &&
++ git commit -m base &&
++ echo stashed >file &&
++ git stash push -m "stashed" &&
++ echo upstream >file &&
++ git add file &&
++ git commit -m upstream &&
++ test_must_fail git stash apply --ours-label= --theirs-label= &&
++ test_grep "^<<<<<<<$" file &&
++ test_grep "^>>>>>>>$" file
+ )
+'
+
test_expect_success 'stash create reports a locked index' '
test_when_finished "rm -rf repo" &&
git init repo &&
+
+ ## xdiff/xmerge.c ##
+@@ xdiff/xmerge.c: static int fill_conflict_hunk(xdfenv_t *xe1, const char *name1,
+ int size, int i, int style,
+ xdmerge_t *m, char *dest, int marker_size)
+ {
+- int marker1_size = (name1 ? strlen(name1) + 1 : 0);
+- int marker2_size = (name2 ? strlen(name2) + 1 : 0);
+- int marker3_size = (name3 ? strlen(name3) + 1 : 0);
++ int marker1_size = (name1 && *name1 ? strlen(name1) + 1 : 0);
++ int marker2_size = (name2 && *name2 ? strlen(name2) + 1 : 0);
++ int marker3_size = (name3 && *name3 ? strlen(name3) + 1 : 0);
+ int needs_cr = is_cr_needed(xe1, xe2, m);
+
+ if (marker_size <= 0)
2: 64261e3cb6 = 2: 86cf68d024 sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
3: c0d6b4b4c0 ! 3: 78300e0e9a sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels
@@ sequencer.c: void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *
-static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply)
+static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply,
-+ const char *label1, const char *label2,
-+ const char *label_ancestor)
++ const char *label_ours, const char *label_theirs,
++ const char *label_base)
{
struct child_process child = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
int ret = 0;
@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int atte
child.no_stderr = 1;
strvec_push(&child.args, "stash");
strvec_push(&child.args, "apply");
-+ if (label1)
-+ strvec_pushf(&child.args, "--ours-label=%s", label1);
-+ if (label2)
-+ strvec_pushf(&child.args, "--theirs-label=%s", label2);
-+ if (label_ancestor)
-+ strvec_pushf(&child.args, "--base-label=%s", label_ancestor);
++ if (label_ours)
++ strvec_pushf(&child.args, "--ours-label=%s", label_ours);
++ if (label_theirs)
++ strvec_pushf(&child.args, "--theirs-label=%s", label_theirs);
++ if (label_base)
++ strvec_pushf(&child.args, "--base-label=%s", label_base);
strvec_push(&child.args, stash_oid);
ret = run_command(&child);
}
@@ sequencer.c: int apply_autostash(const char *path)
static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
- int attempt_apply)
+ int attempt_apply,
-+ const char *label1, const char *label2,
-+ const char *label_ancestor)
++ const char *label_ours, const char *label_theirs,
++ const char *label_base)
{
struct object_id stash_oid;
char stash_oid_hex[GIT_MAX_HEXSZ + 1];
@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const cha
oid_to_hex_r(stash_oid_hex, &stash_oid);
- ret = apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply);
+ ret = apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply,
-+ label1, label2, label_ancestor);
++ label_ours, label_theirs, label_base);
refs_delete_ref(get_main_ref_store(r), "", refname,
&stash_oid, REF_NO_DEREF);
@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const cha
+}
+
+int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
-+ const char *label1, const char *label2,
-+ const char *label_ancestor)
++ const char *label_ours, const char *label_theirs,
++ const char *label_base)
+{
+ return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 1,
-+ label1, label2, label_ancestor);
++ label_ours, label_theirs, label_base);
}
static int checkout_onto(struct repository *r, struct replay_opts *opts,
@@ sequencer.h: int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);
int apply_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid);
int apply_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);
+int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
-+ const char *label1, const char *label2,
-+ const char *label_ancestor);
++ const char *label_ours, const char *label_theirs,
++ const char *label_base);
#define SUMMARY_INITIAL_COMMIT (1 << 0)
#define SUMMARY_SHOW_AUTHOR_DATE (1 << 1) 4: 1c29e19971 ! 4: aa18313362 checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
@@ Documentation/git-checkout.adoc: $ git checkout mytopic
+When the --merge (-m) option is in effect and the locally
+modified files overlap with files that need to be updated by the
+branch switch, the changes are stashed and reapplied after the
-+switch. If the stash application results in conflicts, they are not -+resolved and the stash is saved to the stash list:
++switch. If this process results in conflicts, a stash entry is saved ++and made available in git stash list:
------------
$ git checkout -m mytopic
@@ Documentation/git-checkout.adoc: $ git checkout mytopic
## Documentation/git-switch.adoc ##
@@ Documentation/git-switch.adoc: variable.
- If you have local modifications to one or more files that are
- different between the current branch and the branch to which
- you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in
+
+ -m::
+ --merge::
+- If you have local modifications to one or more files that are
+- different between the current branch and the branch to which
+- you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in
- order to preserve your modifications in context. However,
- with this option, a three-way merge between the current
- branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch is
@@ Documentation/git-switch.adoc: variable.
-paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with git add (or git rm if the merge -should result in deletion of the path).
-+ order to preserve your modifications in context. With this
-+ option, the conflicting local changes are automatically
-+ stashed before the switch and reapplied afterwards. If the
-+ local changes do not overlap with the differences between
-+ branches, the switch proceeds without stashing. If
-+ reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the entry is
-+ saved to the stash list. Resolve the conflicts and run
-+ git stash drop when done, or clear the working tree
-+ (e.g. with git reset --hard) before running git stash pop
-+ later to re-apply your changes.
++ If you have local modifications to one or more files that
++ are different between the current branch and the branch to
++ which you are switching, the command normally refuses to
++ switch branches in order to preserve your modifications in
++ context. However, with this option, the conflicting local
++ changes are automatically stashed before the switch and
++ reapplied afterwards. If the local changes do not overlap
++ with the differences between branches, the switch proceeds
++ without stashing. If reapplying the stash results in
++ conflicts, the entry is saved to the stash list. Resolve
++ the conflicts and run git stash drop when done, or clear
++ the working tree (e.g. with git reset --hard) before
++ running git stash pop later to re-apply your changes.
--conflict=<style>::
The same as --merge option above, but changes the way the
@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>'
+ git clean -f &&
+
+ fill 0 x y z >same &&
++ git stash list >stash-before &&
+ git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 &&
+ test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual &&
++ git stash list >stash-after &&
++ test_cmp stash-before stash-after &&
+ fill 0 x y z >expect &&
+ test_cmp expect same
+'
@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>'
+
+ fill DIRTY a b c INSERTED d >file &&
+
++ git stash list >stash-before &&
+ git checkout -m nonoverlap_base 2>stderr &&
+ test_grep "Applied autostash" stderr &&
+ test_grep ! "resulted in conflicts" stderr &&
+
++ git stash list >stash-after &&
++ test_cmp stash-before stash-after &&
++
+ fill DIRTY a b c d >expect &&
+ test_cmp expect file &&
+
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v8 1/4 stash: add --ours-label, --theirs-label, --base-label for apply
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Allow callers of "git stash apply" to pass custom labels for conflict markers instead of the default "Updated upstream" and "Stashed changes". Document the new options and add a test.
--- Documentation/git-stash.adoc | 11 ++++++++++- builtin/stash.c | 2 +- t/t3903-stash.sh | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ xdiff/xmerge.c | 6 +++--- 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-stash.adoc +10 -1
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ git stash list [<log-options>] git stash show [-u | --include-untracked | --only-untracked] [<diff-options>] [<stash>] git stash drop [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] git stash pop [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] -git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] +git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--ours-label=<label>] [--theirs-label=<label>] [--base-label=<label>] [<stash>] git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>] git stash [push] [-p | --patch] [-S | --staged] [-k | --[no-]keep-index] [-q | --quiet] [-u | --include-untracked] [-a | --all] [(-m | --message) <message>]
@@ -195,6 +195,15 @@ the index's ones. However, this can fail, when you have conflicts (which are stored in the index, where you therefore can no longer apply the changes as they were originally). +`--ours-label=<label>`:: +`--theirs-label=<label>`:: +`--base-label=<label>`:: + These options are only valid for the `apply` command. ++ +Use the given labels in conflict markers instead of the default +"Updated upstream", "Stashed changes", and "Stash base". +`--base-label` only has an effect with merge.conflictStyle=diff3. + `-k`:: `--keep-index`:: `--no-keep-index`::
builtin/stash.c +1 -1
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@#define BUILTIN_STASH_POP_USAGE \ N_("git stash pop [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_APPLY_USAGE \ - N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]") + N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--ours-label=<label>] [--theirs-label=<label>] [--base-label=<label>] [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_BRANCH_USAGE \ N_("git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_STORE_USAGE \
t/t3903-stash.sh +37 -0
@@ -1666,6 +1666,43 @@ test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' ' ) ' +test_expect_success 'apply with custom conflict labels' ' + git init conflict_labels && + ( + cd conflict_labels && + echo base >file && + git add file && + git commit -m base && + echo stashed >file && + git stash push -m "stashed" && + echo upstream >file && + git add file && + git commit -m upstream && + test_must_fail git -c merge.conflictStyle=diff3 stash apply --ours-label=UP --theirs-label=STASH && + test_grep "^<<<<<<< UP" file && + test_grep "^||||||| Stash base" file && + test_grep "^>>>>>>> STASH" file + ) +' + +test_expect_success 'apply with empty conflict labels' ' + git init empty_labels && + ( + cd empty_labels && + echo base >file && + git add file && + git commit -m base && + echo stashed >file && + git stash push -m "stashed" && + echo upstream >file && + git add file && + git commit -m upstream && + test_must_fail git stash apply --ours-label= --theirs-label= && + test_grep "^<<<<<<<$" file && + test_grep "^>>>>>>>$" file + ) +' + test_expect_success 'stash create reports a locked index' ' test_when_finished "rm -rf repo" && git init repo &&
xdiff/xmerge.c +3 -3
@@ -199,9 +199,9 @@ static int fill_conflict_hunk(xdfenv_t *xe1, const char *name1, int size, int i, int style, xdmerge_t *m, char *dest, int marker_size) { - int marker1_size = (name1 ? strlen(name1) + 1 : 0); -int marker2_size = (name2 ?strlen (name2) +1 :0 ); -int marker3_size = (name3 ?strlen (name3) +1 :0 ); + int marker1_size = (name1 && *name1 ? strlen(name1) + 1 : 0); +int marker2_size = (name2 && *name2 ?strlen (name2) +1 :0 ); +int marker3_size = (name3 && *name3 ?strlen (name3) +1 :0 );int needs_cr =is_cr_needed (xe1, xe2, m);if (marker_size <=0 )
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] stash: add --ours-label, --theirs-label, --base-label for apply
Hi Harald
Quoted 5 lines · Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Allow callers of "git stash apply" to pass custom labels for conflict markers instead of the default "Updated upstream" and "Stashed changes". Document the new options and add a test.
Sounds sensible and the documentation looks good.
builtin/stash.c line 50
Quoted 13 lines
builtin/stash.c +1
-1@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@#define BUILTIN_STASH_POP_USAGE \ N_("git stash pop [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_APPLY_USAGE \ - N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]") + N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--ours-label=<label>] [--theirs-label=<label>] [--base-label=<label>] [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_BRANCH_USAGE \ N_("git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_STORE_USAGE \
This patch seems to be missing the implementation of these new options. Before submitting a patch series I find it is very helpful to run
git rebase --keep-base -x make -x 'cd t && prove -j6 <tests that I
think might fail>'
to catch any mistakes.
t/t3903-stash.sh test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' ' · line 1670
Quoted 10 lines
t/t3903-stash.sh +2
-0@@ -1666,6 +1666,43 @@ test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' ' ) ' +test_expect_success 'apply with custom conflict labels' ' + git init conflict_labels &&
Why do we need to create a new repository just to stash some changes?
t/t3903-stash.sh test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' ' · line 1675
Quoted 5 lines
t/t3903-stash.sh +5
-0+ ( + cd conflict_labels && + echo base >file && + git add file && + git commit -m base &&
We have a helper test_commit() for creating commits (it is documented in t/test-lib-functions.sh)
t/t3903-stash.sh test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' ' · line 1684
Quoted 9 lines
t/t3903-stash.sh +9
-0+ echo stashed >file && + git stash push -m "stashed" && + echo upstream >file && + git add file && + git commit -m upstream && + test_must_fail git -c merge.conflictStyle=diff3 stash apply --ours-label=UP --theirs-label=STASH && + test_grep "^<<<<<<< UP" file && + test_grep "^||||||| Stash base" file && + test_grep "^>>>>>>> STASH" file
Hurray for the use of test_grep here!
t/t3903-stash.sh test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' ' · line 1688
Quoted 4 lines
t/t3903-stash.sh +4
-0+ ) +' + +test_expect_success 'apply with empty conflict labels' '
Why do we want to support empty labels rather than making them an error?
Thanks
Phillip
Quoted 37 lines
t/t3903-stash.sh +17
-0+ git init empty_labels && + ( + cd empty_labels && + echo base >file && + git add file && + git commit -m base && + echo stashed >file && + git stash push -m "stashed" && + echo upstream >file && + git add file && + git commit -m upstream && + test_must_fail git stash apply --ours-label= --theirs-label= && + test_grep "^<<<<<<<$" file && + test_grep "^>>>>>>>$" file + ) +' + test_expect_success 'stash create reports a locked index' ' test_when_finished "rm -rf repo" && git init repo &&xdiff/xmerge.c +3
-3@@ -199,9 +199,9 @@ static int fill_conflict_hunk(xdfenv_t *xe1, const char *name1, int size, int i, int style, xdmerge_t *m, char *dest, int marker_size) { - int marker1_size = (name1 ? strlen(name1) + 1 : 0); -int marker2_size = (name2 ?strlen (name2) +1 :0 ); -int marker3_size = (name3 ?strlen (name3) +1 :0 ); + int marker1_size = (name1 && *name1 ? strlen(name1) + 1 : 0); +int marker2_size = (name2 && *name2 ?strlen (name2) +1 :0 ); +int marker3_size = (name3 && *name3 ?strlen (name3) +1 :0 );int needs_cr =is_cr_needed (xe1, xe2, m);if (marker_size <=0 )
Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] stash: add --ours-label, --theirs-label, --base-label for apply
Quoted 3 lines · Phillip Wood
Quoted 1 line
+test_expect_success 'apply with empty conflict labels' '
Why do we want to support empty labels rather than making them an error?
Why not?
There are applications that do not require, and prefer to have more stable output that will not be affected by UI updates to improve human-user experience. Even though rerere database is not populated with the facility this patch implements, we can see in
$ grep -C2 -e '^\([<=>]\)\1\{6,\}$' .git/rr-cache/*/preimage*how having labels make the output more noisy, and more importantly, will make it misleading given how rerere is designed to work, treating the same merge conflicts in both directions equivalents. It is not a huge stretch of imagination that our users will find similar needs, I would imagine.
Quoted 7 lines
This patch seems to be missing the implementation of these new options. Before submitting a patch series I find it is very helpful to run
git rebase --keep-base -x make -x 'cd t && prove -j6 <tests that Ithink might fail>'
to catch any mistakes.
Wow, that command is so powerful! Thanks for sharing that!
Will shift that definition to an earlier commit in my set.
Quoted 1 line
Why do we need to create a new repository just to stash some changes?
Isn't it good to do it in isolation, for when the test and/or its cleanup fails. I tried to change it now, but it's not trivial, I quickly broke a lot of subsequent tests.
Quoted 2 lines
We have a helper
test_commit()for creating commits (it is documented int/test-lib-functions.sh)
Thanks, will update!
Harald
PATCH v8 2/4 sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add a silent parameter to create_autostash_internal and introduce create_autostash_ref_silent so that callers can create an autostash without printing the "Created autostash" message. Use stderr for the message when not silent.
--- sequencer.c | 15 +++++++++++---- sequencer.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
sequencer.c +11 -4
@@ -4657,7 +4657,8 @@ static enum todo_command peek_command(struct todo_list *todo_list, int offset)static void create_autostash_internal (struct repository *r,const char *path, -const char *refname) +const char *refname, +int silent) {struct strbuf buf =STRBUF_INIT ;struct lock_file lock_file =LOCK_INIT ;
@@ -4702,7 +4703,8 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r, &oid, null_oid(the_hash_algo), 0, UPDATE_REFS_DIE_ON_ERR); } -printf (_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf); +if (!silent) +fprintf (stderr,_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf);if (reset_head (r, &ropts) <0 )die (_ ("could not reset --hard" ));discard_index (r->index);
@@ -4714,12 +4716,17 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path) { -create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL ); +create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL ,0 ); }void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname); +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname,0 ); +} + +void create_autostash_ref_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname) +{ +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname,1 ); }static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply)
sequencer.h +1 -0
@@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ void commit_post_rewrite(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path);void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +void create_autostash_ref_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int save_autostash (const char *path);int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
Hi Harald
Quoted 6 lines · Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add a silent parameter to
create_autostash_internaland introducecreate_autostash_ref_silentso that callers can create an autostash without printing the "Created autostash" message. Use stderr for the message when not silent.
Why do we want to change where the message is printed? It is not necessarily a bad idea but it would be helpful to explain why we want that particular change.
Quoted 11 lines
Signed-off-by Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>--- sequencer.c | 15 +++++++++++---- sequencer.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)sequencer.c +0
-0
sequencer.c static enum todo_command peek_command(struct todo_list *todo_list, int offset) · line 4661
Quoted 6 lines
sequencer.c +2
-1@@ -4657,7 +4657,8 @@ static enum todo_command peek_command(struct todo_list *todo_list, int offset)static void create_autostash_internal (struct repository *r,const char *path, -const char *refname) +const char *refname, +int silent)
This could be a "bool" and the users could pass "true" and "false". Apart from that this looks good.
Thanks
Phillip
Quoted 45 lines
sequencer.c +9
-3{struct strbuf buf =STRBUF_INIT ;struct lock_file lock_file =LOCK_INIT ;@@ -4702,7 +4703,8 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r, &oid, null_oid(the_hash_algo), 0, UPDATE_REFS_DIE_ON_ERR); } -printf (_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf); +if (!silent) +fprintf (stderr,_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf);if (reset_head (r, &ropts) <0 )die (_ ("could not reset --hard" ));discard_index (r->index);@@ -4714,12 +4716,17 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path) { -create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL ); +create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL ,0 ); }void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname); +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname,0 ); +} + +void create_autostash_ref_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname) +{ +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname,1 ); }static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply)sequencer.h +1
-0@@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ void commit_post_rewrite(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path);void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +void create_autostash_ref_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int save_autostash (const char *path);int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);
Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
Quoted 8 lines · Phillip Wood
Quoted 4 lines
Add a silent parameter to
create_autostash_internaland introducecreate_autostash_ref_silentso that callers can create an autostash without printing the "Created autostash" message. Use stderr for the message when not silent.Why do we want to change where the message is printed? It is not necessarily a bad idea but it would be helpful to explain why we want that particular change.
Yes, this is a great point.
Quoted 3 lines
Why do we want to change where the message is printed? It is not necessarily a bad idea but it would be helpful to explain why we want that particular change.
No good reason, and I will revert it.
Quoted 1 line
This could be a "bool" and the users could pass "true" and "false".
Agreed.
Harald
PATCH v8 3/4 sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add label1, label2, and label_ancestor parameters to the autostash apply machinery so callers can pass custom conflict marker labels through to "git stash apply --ours-label/--theirs-label/--base-label". Introduce apply_autostash_ref_with_labels() for callers that want to pass labels.
--- sequencer.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- sequencer.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
sequencer.c +27 -7
@@ -4729,7 +4729,9 @@ void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname)create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname,1 ); } -static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply) +static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base) {struct child_process child =CHILD_PROCESS_INIT ;int ret =0 ;
@@ -4740,6 +4742,12 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply) child.no_stderr =1 ;strvec_push (&child.args,"stash" );strvec_push (&child.args,"apply" ); +if (label_ours) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--ours-label=%s" , label_ours); +if (label_theirs) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--theirs-label=%s" , label_theirs); +if (label_base) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--base-label=%s" , label_base);strvec_push (&child.args, stash_oid); ret =run_command (&child); }
@@ -4784,7 +4792,8 @@ static int apply_save_autostash(const char *path, int attempt_apply) }strbuf_trim (&stash_oid); - ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply); + ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply, +NULL ,NULL ,NULL );unlink (path);strbuf_release (&stash_oid);
@@ -4803,11 +4812,13 @@ int apply_autostash(const char *path)int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid) { -return apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid,1 ); +return apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid,1 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); }static int apply_save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname, -int attempt_apply) +int attempt_apply, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base) {struct object_id stash_oid;char stash_oid_hex[GIT_MAX_HEXSZ +1 ];
@@ -4823,7 +4834,8 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,return error (_ ("autostash reference is a symref" ));oid_to_hex_r (stash_oid_hex, &stash_oid); - ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply); + ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply, + label_ours, label_theirs, label_base);refs_delete_ref (get_main_ref_store (r),"" , refname, &stash_oid,REF_NO_DEREF );
@@ -4833,12 +4845,20 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,0 ); +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,0 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); }int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 ); +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); +} + +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base) +{ +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 , + label_ours, label_theirs, label_base); } static int checkout_onto(struct repository *r, struct replay_opts *opts,
sequencer.h +3 -0
@@ -236,6 +236,9 @@ int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid);int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base);#define SUMMARY_INITIAL_COMMIT (1 << 0)#define SUMMARY_SHOW_AUTHOR_DATE (1 << 1)
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v8 3/4] sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels
Hi Harald
Quoted 7 lines · Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add label1, label2, and
label_ancestorparameters to the autostash apply machinery so callers can pass custom conflict marker labels through to "git stash apply --ours-label/--theirs-label/--base-label". Introduceapply_autostash_ref_with_labels()for callers that want to pass labels.
This looks good. In the future we could use this to set some better labels for "git rebase --autostash" but that does not need to be part of this series.
I'll leave it there for today and take a look at the last patch next week. It would be a good idea to wait a few days to see if anyone else has any comments before sending a new version.
Thanks
Phillip
Quoted 107 lines
Signed-off-by Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>--- sequencer.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- sequencer.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)sequencer.c +27
-7@@ -4729,7 +4729,9 @@ void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname)create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname,1 ); } -static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply) +static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base) {struct child_process child =CHILD_PROCESS_INIT ;int ret =0 ;@@ -4740,6 +4742,12 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply) child.no_stderr =1 ;strvec_push (&child.args,"stash" );strvec_push (&child.args,"apply" ); +if (label_ours) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--ours-label=%s" , label_ours); +if (label_theirs) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--theirs-label=%s" , label_theirs); +if (label_base) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--base-label=%s" , label_base);strvec_push (&child.args, stash_oid); ret =run_command (&child); }@@ -4784,7 +4792,8 @@ static int apply_save_autostash(const char *path, int attempt_apply) }strbuf_trim (&stash_oid); - ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply); + ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply, +NULL ,NULL ,NULL );unlink (path);strbuf_release (&stash_oid);@@ -4803,11 +4812,13 @@ int apply_autostash(const char *path)int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid) { -return apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid,1 ); +return apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid,1 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); }static int apply_save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname, -int attempt_apply) +int attempt_apply, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base) {struct object_id stash_oid;char stash_oid_hex[GIT_MAX_HEXSZ +1 ];@@ -4823,7 +4834,8 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,return error (_ ("autostash reference is a symref" ));oid_to_hex_r (stash_oid_hex, &stash_oid); - ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply); + ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply, + label_ours, label_theirs, label_base);refs_delete_ref (get_main_ref_store (r),"" , refname, &stash_oid,REF_NO_DEREF );@@ -4833,12 +4845,20 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,0 ); +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,0 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); }int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 ); +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); +} + +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base) +{ +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 , + label_ours, label_theirs, label_base); } static int checkout_onto(struct repository *r, struct replay_opts *opts,sequencer.h +3
-0@@ -236,6 +236,9 @@ int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid);int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base);#define SUMMARY_INITIAL_COMMIT (1 << 0)#define SUMMARY_SHOW_AUTHOR_DATE (1 << 1)
Re: [PATCH v8 3/4] sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels
Quoted 6 lines · Phillip Wood
Hi Harald
Quoted 3 lines · Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add label1, label2, and
label_ancestorparameters to the autostash
Sorry, I just noticed that these three should have been updated when the actual parameters were renamed.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
apply machinery so callers can pass custom conflict marker labels through to "git stash apply --ours-label/--theirs-label/--base-label". Introduce
apply_autostash_ref_with_labels()for callers that want to pass labels.This looks good. In the future we could use this to set some better labels for "git rebase --autostash" but that does not need to be part of this series.
Great.
Quoted 2 lines
Sorry, I just noticed that these three should have been updated when the actual parameters were renamed.
Good point!
I also switched it to prefix naming label_*, which makes more sense to me.
Harald
PATCH v8 4/4 checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
When switching branches with "git checkout -m", local modifications can block the switch. Teach the -m flow to create a temporary stash before switching and reapply it after. On success, only "Applied autostash." is shown. If reapplying causes conflicts, the stash is kept and the user is told they can resolve and run "git stash drop", or run "git reset --hard" and later "git stash pop" to recover their changes.
--- Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 58 +++++----- Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 33 +++--- builtin/checkout.c | 138 ++++++++++------------ builtin/stash.c | 30 ++++- sequencer.c | 18 ++- t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh | 24 +++- t/t7201-co.sh | 195 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t7600-merge.sh | 2 +- xdiff-interface.c | 12 ++ xdiff-interface.h | 1 + 10 files changed, 370 insertions(+), 141 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +31 -27
@@ -251,20 +251,19 @@ working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc. are different between the current branch and the branch to which you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in order to preserve your modifications in context. - However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current - branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch - is done, and you will be on the new branch. -+ -When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting -paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge -should result in deletion of the path). + With this option, the conflicting local changes are + automatically stashed before the switch and reapplied + afterwards. If the local changes do not overlap with the + differences between branches, the switch proceeds without + stashing. If reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the + entry is saved to the stash list. Resolve the conflicts + and run `git stash drop` when done, or clear the working + tree (e.g. with `git reset --hard`) before running `git stash + pop` later to re-apply your changes. + When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate the conflicted merge in the specified paths. This option cannot be used when checking out paths from a tree-ish. -+ -When switching branches with `--merge`, staged changes may be lost. `--conflict=<style>`:: The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
@@ -578,39 +577,44 @@ $ git checkout mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a -three-way merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would carry your local +changes to the new branch: ------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Switched to branch 'mytopic' ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch. === 3. Merge conflict -When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with -the `-m` option, you would see something like this: +When the `--merge` (`-m`) option is in effect and the locally +modified files overlap with files that need to be updated by the +branch switch, the changes are stashed and reapplied after the +switch. If this process results in conflicts, a stash entry is saved +and made available in `git stash list`: ------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz -ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz -fatal: merge program failed ------------- +Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry +forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: -At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in -the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted -files. Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with -`git add` as usual: + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. ------------ -$ edit frotz -$ git add frotz ------------- + +You can try resolving the conflicts now. Edit the conflicting files +and mark them resolved with `git add` as usual, then run `git stash +drop` to discard the stash entry. Alternatively, you can clear the +working tree with `git reset --hard` and recover your local changes +later with `git stash pop`. CONFIGURATION -------------
Documentation/git-switch.adoc +17 -16
@@ -123,18 +123,19 @@ variable. `-m`:: `--merge`:: - If you have local modifications to one or more files that are - different between the current branch and the branch to which - you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in - order to preserve your modifications in context. However, - with this option, a three-way merge between the current - branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch is - done, and you will be on the new branch. -+ -When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting -paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge -should result in deletion of the path). + If you have local modifications to one or more files that + are different between the current branch and the branch to + which you are switching, the command normally refuses to + switch branches in order to preserve your modifications in + context. However, with this option, the conflicting local + changes are automatically stashed before the switch and + reapplied afterwards. If the local changes do not overlap + with the differences between branches, the switch proceeds + without stashing. If reapplying the stash results in + conflicts, the entry is saved to the stash list. Resolve + the conflicts and run `git stash drop` when done, or clear + the working tree (e.g. with `git reset --hard`) before + running `git stash pop` later to re-apply your changes. `--conflict=<style>`:: The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
@@ -217,15 +218,15 @@ $ git switch mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a three-way -merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would carry your local +changes to the new branch: ------------ $ git switch -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Switched to branch 'mytopic' ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
builtin/checkout.c +58 -80
205 lines not on this page · raw message
builtin/stash.c +24 -6
@@ -590,8 +590,11 @@ static void unstage_changes_unless_new(struct object_id *orig_tree)die (_ ("could not write index" )); } -static int do_apply_stash (const char *prefix,struct stash_info *info, -int index,int quiet) +static int do_apply_stash_with_labels (const char *prefix, +struct stash_info *info, +int index,int quiet, +const char *label1,const char *label2, +const char *label_ancestor) {int clean, ret;int has_index = index;
@@ -643,9 +646,9 @@ static int do_apply_stash(const char *prefix, struct stash_info *info,init_ui_merge_options (&o, the_repository); - o.branch1 ="Updated upstream" ; - o.branch2 ="Stashed changes" ; - o.ancestor ="Stash base" ; + o.branch1 = label1 ? label1 :"Updated upstream" ; + o.branch2 = label2 ? label2 :"Stashed changes" ; + o.ancestor = label_ancestor ? label_ancestor :"Stash base" ;if (oideq (&info->b_tree, &c_tree)) o.branch1 ="Version stash was based on" ;
@@ -717,17 +720,31 @@ restore_untracked:return ret; } +static int do_apply_stash (const char *prefix,struct stash_info *info, +int index,int quiet) +{ +return do_apply_stash_with_labels (prefix, info, index, quiet, +NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); +} +static int apply_stash (int argc,const char **argv,const char *prefix, struct repository *repo UNUSED) {int ret =-1 ;int quiet =0 ;int index = use_index; +const char *label1 =NULL , *label2 =NULL , *label_ancestor =NULL ;struct stash_info info =STASH_INFO_INIT ;struct option options[] = {OPT__QUIET (&quiet,N_ ("be quiet, only report errors" )),OPT_BOOL (0 ,"index" , &index,N_ ("attempt to recreate the index" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"ours-label" , &label1,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the upstream side in conflict markers" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"theirs-label" , &label2,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the stashed side in conflict markers" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"base-label" , &label_ancestor,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the base in diff3 conflict markers" )),OPT_END () };
@@ -737,7 +754,8 @@ static int apply_stash(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,if (get_stash_info (&info, argc, argv)) goto cleanup; - ret =do_apply_stash (prefix, &info, index, quiet); + ret =do_apply_stash_with_labels (prefix, &info, index, quiet, + label1, label2, label_ancestor); cleanup:free_stash_info (&info);return ret;
sequencer.c +13 -5
@@ -4766,15 +4766,23 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply,strvec_push (&store.args, stash_oid);if (run_command (&store)) ret =error (_ ("cannot store %s" ), stash_oid); +else if (attempt_apply) +fprintf (stderr, +_ ("Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry\n" +"forward your local changes resulted in conflicts:\n" +"\n" +" - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them\n" +" successfully, discard the stash entry with \"git stash drop\".\n" +"\n" +" - Alternatively you can \"git reset --hard\" if you do not want\n" +" to deal with them right now, and later \"git stash pop\" to\n" +" recover your local changes.\n" ));else fprintf (stderr, -_ ("%s\n" +_ ("Autostash exists; creating a new stash entry.\n" "Your changes are safe in the stash.\n" "You can run \"git stash pop\" or" -" \"git stash drop\" at any time.\n" ), - attempt_apply ? -_ ("Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." ) : -_ ("Autostash exists; creating a new stash entry." )); +" \"git stash drop\" at any time.\n" )); }return ret;
t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh +18 -6
@@ -61,18 +61,30 @@ create_expected_failure_apply () { First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... Applying: second commit Applying: third commit - Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. - Your changes are safe in the stash. - You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. + Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry + forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: + + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. EOF } create_expected_failure_merge () { cat >expected <<-EOF $(grep "^Created autostash: [0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*\$" actual) - Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. - Your changes are safe in the stash. - You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. + Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry + forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: + + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/rebased-feature-branch. EOF }
t/t7201-co.sh +195 -0
201 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t7600-merge.sh +1 -1
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ test_expect_success 'merge with conflicted --autostash changes' ' git diff >expect && test_when_finished "test_might_fail git stash drop" && git merge --autostash c3 2>err && - test_grep "Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." err && + test_grep "your local changes resulted in conflicts" err && git show HEAD:file >merge-result && test_cmp result.1-9 merge-result && git stash show -p >actual &&
xdiff-interface.c +12 -0
@@ -325,6 +325,18 @@ int parse_conflict_style_name(const char *value)return -1 ; } +const char *conflict_style_name (int style) +{ +switch (style) { +case XDL_MERGE_DIFF3 : +return "diff3" ; +case XDL_MERGE_ZEALOUS_DIFF3 : +return "zdiff3" ; +default : +return "merge" ; + } +} +int git_xmerge_style =-1 ; int git_xmerge_config(const char *var, const char *value,
xdiff-interface.h +1 -0
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ void xdiff_set_find_func(xdemitconf_t *xecfg, const char *line, int cflags);void xdiff_clear_find_func (xdemitconf_t *xecfg);struct config_context ;int parse_conflict_style_name (const char *value); +const char *conflict_style_name (int style);int git_xmerge_config (const char *var,const char *value,const struct config_context *ctx,void *cb);extern int git_xmerge_style;
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v8 4/4] checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
Quoted 4 lines · Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
... If reapplying causes conflicts, the stash is
kept and the user is told they can resolve and run "git stash drop", or run "git reset --hard" and later "git stash pop" to recover their changes.
I might suggest that this should recommend "git stash pop --index" (either always, or if the stashed index differs from the stash's parent).
Chris
Quoted 2 lines
I might suggest that this should recommend "git stash pop --index" (either always, or if the stashed index differs from the stash's parent).
Interesting! This is a new option that I've never seen before.
Harald
v9 cover checkout: 'autostash' for branch switching
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetHarald Nordgren (4):
stash: add --label-ours, --label-theirs, --label-base for apply
sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker
labels
checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 58 +++++----- Documentation/git-stash.adoc | 11 +- Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 33 +++--- builtin/checkout.c | 138 ++++++++++------------ builtin/stash.c | 32 ++++-- sequencer.c | 67 ++++++++--- sequencer.h | 4 + t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh | 24 +++- t/t3903-stash.sh | 29 +++++ t/t7201-co.sh | 195 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t7600-merge.sh | 2 +- xdiff-interface.c | 12 ++ xdiff-interface.h | 1 + xdiff/xmerge.c | 6 +- 14 files changed, 455 insertions(+), 157 deletions(-)
base-commit: cd412a49627774a14b3e49237109a77bd3ea70c0
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-2234%2FHaraldNordgren%2Fcheckout_autostash-v9
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-2234/HaraldNordgren/checkout_autostash-v9
Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/2234
Range-diff vs v8:
1: 8fcf377820 ! 1: 5d5dc1f60e stash: add --ours-label, --theirs-label, --base-label for apply
@@ Metadata
Author: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
## Commit message ##
- stash: add --ours-label, --theirs-label, --base-label for apply
+ stash: add --label-ours, --label-theirs, --label-base for apply
Allow callers of "git stash apply" to pass custom labels for conflict
markers instead of the default "Updated upstream" and "Stashed changes".
@@ Documentation/git-stash.adoc: git stash list [<log-options>]
git stash drop [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]
git stash pop [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]
-git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]
-+git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--ours-label=<label>] [--theirs-label=<label>] [--base-label=<label>] [<stash>]
++git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--label-ours=<label>] [--label-theirs=<label>] [--label-base=<label>] [<stash>]
git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>]
git stash [push] [-p | --patch] [-S | --staged] [-k | --[no-]keep-index] [-q | --quiet]
[-u | --include-untracked] [-a | --all] [(-m | --message) <message>]
@@ Documentation/git-stash.adoc: the index's ones. However, this can fail, when you
(which are stored in the index, where you therefore can no longer
apply the changes as they were originally).
-+`--ours-label=<label>`::
-+`--theirs-label=<label>`::
-+`--base-label=<label>`::
++`--label-ours=<label>`::
++`--label-theirs=<label>`::
++`--label-base=<label>`::
+ These options are only valid for the `apply` command.
++
+Use the given labels in conflict markers instead of the default
+"Updated upstream", "Stashed changes", and "Stash base".
-+`--base-label` only has an effect with merge.conflictStyle=diff3.
++`--label-base` only has an effect with merge.conflictStyle=diff3.
+
`-k`::
`--keep-index`::
@@ builtin/stash.c
N_("git stash pop [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]")
#define BUILTIN_STASH_APPLY_USAGE \
- N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]")
-+ N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--ours-label=<label>] [--theirs-label=<label>] [--base-label=<label>] [<stash>]")
++ N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--label-ours=<label>] [--label-theirs=<label>] [--label-base=<label>] [<stash>]")
#define BUILTIN_STASH_BRANCH_USAGE \
N_("git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>]")
#define BUILTIN_STASH_STORE_USAGE \
+@@ builtin/stash.c: static void unstage_changes_unless_new(struct object_id *orig_tree)
+ die(_("could not write index"));
+ }
+
+-static int do_apply_stash(const char *prefix, struct stash_info *info,
+- int index, int quiet)
++static int do_apply_stash_with_labels(const char *prefix,
++ struct stash_info *info,
++ int index, int quiet,
++ const char *label_ours, const char *label_theirs,
++ const char *label_base)
+ {
+ int clean, ret;
+ int has_index = index;
+@@ builtin/stash.c: static int do_apply_stash(const char *prefix, struct stash_info *info,
+
+ init_ui_merge_options(&o, the_repository);
+
+- o.branch1 = "Updated upstream";
+- o.branch2 = "Stashed changes";
+- o.ancestor = "Stash base";
++ o.branch1 = label_ours ? label_ours : "Updated upstream";
++ o.branch2 = label_theirs ? label_theirs : "Stashed changes";
++ o.ancestor = label_base ? label_base : "Stash base";
+
+ if (oideq(&info->b_tree, &c_tree))
+ o.branch1 = "Version stash was based on";
+@@ builtin/stash.c: restore_untracked:
+ return ret;
+ }
+
++static int do_apply_stash(const char *prefix, struct stash_info *info,
++ int index, int quiet)
++{
++ return do_apply_stash_with_labels(prefix, info, index, quiet,
++ NULL, NULL, NULL);
++}
++
+ static int apply_stash(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,
+ struct repository *repo UNUSED)
+ {
+ int ret = -1;
+ int quiet = 0;
+ int index = use_index;
++ const char *label_ours = NULL, *label_theirs = NULL, *label_base = NULL;
+ struct stash_info info = STASH_INFO_INIT;
+ struct option options[] = {
+ OPT__QUIET(&quiet, N_("be quiet, only report errors")),
+ OPT_BOOL(0, "index", &index,
+ N_("attempt to recreate the index")),
++ OPT_STRING(0, "label-ours", &label_ours, N_("label"),
++ N_("label for the upstream side in conflict markers")),
++ OPT_STRING(0, "label-theirs", &label_theirs, N_("label"),
++ N_("label for the stashed side in conflict markers")),
++ OPT_STRING(0, "label-base", &label_base, N_("label"),
++ N_("label for the base in diff3 conflict markers")),
+ OPT_END()
+ };
+
+@@ builtin/stash.c: static int apply_stash(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,
+ if (get_stash_info(&info, argc, argv))
+ goto cleanup;
+
+- ret = do_apply_stash(prefix, &info, index, quiet);
++ ret = do_apply_stash_with_labels(prefix, &info, index, quiet,
++ label_ours, label_theirs, label_base);
+ cleanup:
+ free_stash_info(&info);
+ return ret;
## t/t3903-stash.sh ##
@@ t/t3903-stash.sh: test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' '
@@ t/t3903-stash.sh: test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit
+ git init conflict_labels &&
+ (
+ cd conflict_labels &&
-+ echo base >file &&
-+ git add file &&
-+ git commit -m base &&
++ test_commit base file &&
+ echo stashed >file &&
+ git stash push -m "stashed" &&
-+ echo upstream >file &&
-+ git add file &&
-+ git commit -m upstream &&
-+ test_must_fail git -c merge.conflictStyle=diff3 stash apply --ours-label=UP --theirs-label=STASH &&
++ test_commit upstream file &&
++ test_must_fail git -c merge.conflictStyle=diff3 stash apply --label-ours=UP --label-theirs=STASH &&
+ test_grep "^<<<<<<< UP" file &&
+ test_grep "^||||||| Stash base" file &&
+ test_grep "^>>>>>>> STASH" file
@@ t/t3903-stash.sh: test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit
+ git init empty_labels &&
+ (
+ cd empty_labels &&
-+ echo base >file &&
-+ git add file &&
-+ git commit -m base &&
++ test_commit base file &&
+ echo stashed >file &&
+ git stash push -m "stashed" &&
-+ echo upstream >file &&
-+ git add file &&
-+ git commit -m upstream &&
-+ test_must_fail git stash apply --ours-label= --theirs-label= &&
++ test_commit upstream file &&
++ test_must_fail git stash apply --label-ours= --label-theirs= &&
+ test_grep "^<<<<<<<$" file &&
+ test_grep "^>>>>>>>$" file
+ )
2: 86cf68d024 ! 2: a1fa04a965 sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
@@ Commit message
Add a silent parameter to create_autostash_internal and introduce
create_autostash_ref_silent so that callers can create an autostash
- without printing the "Created autostash" message. Use stderr for
- the message when not silent.
+ without printing the "Created autostash" message.
Signed-off-by: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
@@ sequencer.c: static enum todo_command peek_command(struct todo_list *todo_list,
const char *path,
- const char *refname)
+ const char *refname,
-+ int silent)
++ bool silent)
{
struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
struct lock_file lock_file = LOCK_INIT;
@@ sequencer.c: static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,
- printf(_("Created autostash: %s\n"), buf.buf);
+ if (!silent)
-+ fprintf(stderr, _("Created autostash: %s\n"), buf.buf);
++ printf(_("Created autostash: %s\n"), buf.buf);
if (reset_head(r, &ropts) < 0)
die(_("could not reset --hard"));
discard_index(r->index);
@@ sequencer.c: static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,
void create_autostash(struct repository *r, const char *path)
{
- create_autostash_internal(r, path, NULL);
-+ create_autostash_internal(r, path, NULL, 0);
++ create_autostash_internal(r, path, NULL, false);
}
void create_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
{
- create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname);
-+ create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, 0);
++ create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, false);
+}
+
+void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
+{
-+ create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, 1);
++ create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, true);
}
static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply)
3: 78300e0e9a ! 3: 87216a633b sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels
@@ Metadata
## Commit message ##
sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels
- Add label1, label2, and label_ancestor parameters to the autostash
+ Add label_ours, label_theirs, and label_base parameters to the autostash
apply machinery so callers can pass custom conflict marker labels
- through to "git stash apply --ours-label/--theirs-label/--base-label".
+ through to "git stash apply --label-ours/--label-theirs/--label-base".
Introduce apply_autostash_ref_with_labels() for callers that want
to pass labels.
@@ Commit message
## sequencer.c ##
@@ sequencer.c: void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
- create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, 1);
+ create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, true);
}
-static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply)
@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int atte
strvec_push(&child.args, "stash");
strvec_push(&child.args, "apply");
+ if (label_ours)
-+ strvec_pushf(&child.args, "--ours-label=%s", label_ours);
++ strvec_pushf(&child.args, "--label-ours=%s", label_ours);
+ if (label_theirs)
-+ strvec_pushf(&child.args, "--theirs-label=%s", label_theirs);
++ strvec_pushf(&child.args, "--label-theirs=%s", label_theirs);
+ if (label_base)
-+ strvec_pushf(&child.args, "--base-label=%s", label_base);
++ strvec_pushf(&child.args, "--label-base=%s", label_base);
strvec_push(&child.args, stash_oid);
ret = run_command(&child);
}
4: aa18313362 ! 4: 00e0b3196c checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
int do_merge = 1;
+ int created_autostash = 0;
+ struct strbuf old_commit_shortname = STRBUF_INIT;
-+ const char *stash_label_ancestor = NULL;
++ const char *stash_label_base = NULL;
trace2_cmd_mode("branch");
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
}
+ if (old_branch_info.name)
-+ stash_label_ancestor = old_branch_info.name;
++ stash_label_base = old_branch_info.name;
+ else if (old_branch_info.commit) {
+ strbuf_add_unique_abbrev(&old_commit_shortname,
+ &old_branch_info.commit->object.oid,
+ DEFAULT_ABBREV);
-+ stash_label_ancestor = old_commit_shortname.buf;
++ stash_label_base = old_commit_shortname.buf;
+ }
+
if (do_merge) {
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
+ "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH",
+ new_branch_info->name,
+ "local",
-+ stash_label_ancestor);
++ stash_label_base);
branch_info_release(&old_branch_info);
+ strbuf_release(&old_commit_shortname);
return ret;
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
+ }
+ apply_autostash_ref_with_labels(the_repository, "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH",
+ new_branch_info->name, "local",
-+ stash_label_ancestor);
++ stash_label_base);
+
+ discard_index(the_repository->index);
+ if (repo_read_index(the_repository) < 0)
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
return ret || writeout_error;
}
- ## builtin/stash.c ##
-@@ builtin/stash.c: static void unstage_changes_unless_new(struct object_id *orig_tree)
- die(_("could not write index"));
- }
-
--static int do_apply_stash(const char *prefix, struct stash_info *info,
-- int index, int quiet)
-+static int do_apply_stash_with_labels(const char *prefix,
-+ struct stash_info *info,
-+ int index, int quiet,
-+ const char *label1, const char *label2,
-+ const char *label_ancestor)
- {
- int clean, ret;
- int has_index = index;
-@@ builtin/stash.c: static int do_apply_stash(const char *prefix, struct stash_info *info,
-
- init_ui_merge_options(&o, the_repository);
-
-- o.branch1 = "Updated upstream";
-- o.branch2 = "Stashed changes";
-- o.ancestor = "Stash base";
-+ o.branch1 = label1 ? label1 : "Updated upstream";
-+ o.branch2 = label2 ? label2 : "Stashed changes";
-+ o.ancestor = label_ancestor ? label_ancestor : "Stash base";
-
- if (oideq(&info->b_tree, &c_tree))
- o.branch1 = "Version stash was based on";
-@@ builtin/stash.c: restore_untracked:
- return ret;
- }
-
-+static int do_apply_stash(const char *prefix, struct stash_info *info,
-+ int index, int quiet)
-+{
-+ return do_apply_stash_with_labels(prefix, info, index, quiet,
-+ NULL, NULL, NULL);
-+}
-+
- static int apply_stash(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,
- struct repository *repo UNUSED)
- {
- int ret = -1;
- int quiet = 0;
- int index = use_index;
-+ const char *label1 = NULL, *label2 = NULL, *label_ancestor = NULL;
- struct stash_info info = STASH_INFO_INIT;
- struct option options[] = {
- OPT__QUIET(&quiet, N_("be quiet, only report errors")),
- OPT_BOOL(0, "index", &index,
- N_("attempt to recreate the index")),
-+ OPT_STRING(0, "ours-label", &label1, N_("label"),
-+ N_("label for the upstream side in conflict markers")),
-+ OPT_STRING(0, "theirs-label", &label2, N_("label"),
-+ N_("label for the stashed side in conflict markers")),
-+ OPT_STRING(0, "base-label", &label_ancestor, N_("label"),
-+ N_("label for the base in diff3 conflict markers")),
- OPT_END()
- };
-
-@@ builtin/stash.c: static int apply_stash(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,
- if (get_stash_info(&info, argc, argv))
- goto cleanup;
-
-- ret = do_apply_stash(prefix, &info, index, quiet);
-+ ret = do_apply_stash_with_labels(prefix, &info, index, quiet,
-+ label1, label2, label_ancestor);
- cleanup:
- free_stash_info(&info);
- return ret;
-
## sequencer.c ##
@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply,
strvec_push(&store.args, stash_oid);Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v9 1/4 stash: add --label-ours, --label-theirs, --label-base for apply
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Allow callers of "git stash apply" to pass custom labels for conflict markers instead of the default "Updated upstream" and "Stashed changes". Document the new options and add a test.
--- Documentation/git-stash.adoc | 11 ++++++++++- builtin/stash.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- t/t3903-stash.sh | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ xdiff/xmerge.c | 6 +++--- 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-stash.adoc +10 -1
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ git stash list [<log-options>] git stash show [-u | --include-untracked | --only-untracked] [<diff-options>] [<stash>] git stash drop [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] git stash pop [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] -git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] +git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--label-ours=<label>] [--label-theirs=<label>] [--label-base=<label>] [<stash>] git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>] git stash [push] [-p | --patch] [-S | --staged] [-k | --[no-]keep-index] [-q | --quiet] [-u | --include-untracked] [-a | --all] [(-m | --message) <message>]
@@ -195,6 +195,15 @@ the index's ones. However, this can fail, when you have conflicts (which are stored in the index, where you therefore can no longer apply the changes as they were originally). +`--label-ours=<label>`:: +`--label-theirs=<label>`:: +`--label-base=<label>`:: + These options are only valid for the `apply` command. ++ +Use the given labels in conflict markers instead of the default +"Updated upstream", "Stashed changes", and "Stash base". +`--label-base` only has an effect with merge.conflictStyle=diff3. + `-k`:: `--keep-index`:: `--no-keep-index`::
builtin/stash.c +25 -7
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@#define BUILTIN_STASH_POP_USAGE \ N_("git stash pop [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_APPLY_USAGE \ - N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]") + N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--label-ours=<label>] [--label-theirs=<label>] [--label-base=<label>] [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_BRANCH_USAGE \ N_("git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_STORE_USAGE \
@@ -590,8 +590,11 @@ static void unstage_changes_unless_new(struct object_id *orig_tree)die (_ ("could not write index" )); } -static int do_apply_stash (const char *prefix,struct stash_info *info, -int index,int quiet) +static int do_apply_stash_with_labels (const char *prefix, +struct stash_info *info, +int index,int quiet, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base) {int clean, ret;int has_index = index;
@@ -643,9 +646,9 @@ static int do_apply_stash(const char *prefix, struct stash_info *info,init_ui_merge_options (&o, the_repository); - o.branch1 ="Updated upstream" ; - o.branch2 ="Stashed changes" ; - o.ancestor ="Stash base" ; + o.branch1 = label_ours ? label_ours :"Updated upstream" ; + o.branch2 = label_theirs ? label_theirs :"Stashed changes" ; + o.ancestor = label_base ? label_base :"Stash base" ;if (oideq (&info->b_tree, &c_tree)) o.branch1 ="Version stash was based on" ;
@@ -717,17 +720,31 @@ restore_untracked:return ret; } +static int do_apply_stash (const char *prefix,struct stash_info *info, +int index,int quiet) +{ +return do_apply_stash_with_labels (prefix, info, index, quiet, +NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); +} +static int apply_stash (int argc,const char **argv,const char *prefix, struct repository *repo UNUSED) {int ret =-1 ;int quiet =0 ;int index = use_index; +const char *label_ours =NULL , *label_theirs =NULL , *label_base =NULL ;struct stash_info info =STASH_INFO_INIT ;struct option options[] = {OPT__QUIET (&quiet,N_ ("be quiet, only report errors" )),OPT_BOOL (0 ,"index" , &index,N_ ("attempt to recreate the index" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"label-ours" , &label_ours,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the upstream side in conflict markers" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"label-theirs" , &label_theirs,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the stashed side in conflict markers" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"label-base" , &label_base,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the base in diff3 conflict markers" )),OPT_END () };
@@ -737,7 +754,8 @@ static int apply_stash(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,if (get_stash_info (&info, argc, argv)) goto cleanup; - ret =do_apply_stash (prefix, &info, index, quiet); + ret =do_apply_stash_with_labels (prefix, &info, index, quiet, + label_ours, label_theirs, label_base); cleanup:free_stash_info (&info);return ret;
t/t3903-stash.sh +29 -0
@@ -1666,6 +1666,35 @@ test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' ' ) ' +test_expect_success 'apply with custom conflict labels' ' + git init conflict_labels && + ( + cd conflict_labels && + test_commit base file && + echo stashed >file && + git stash push -m "stashed" && + test_commit upstream file && + test_must_fail git -c merge.conflictStyle=diff3 stash apply --label-ours=UP --label-theirs=STASH && + test_grep "^<<<<<<< UP" file && + test_grep "^||||||| Stash base" file && + test_grep "^>>>>>>> STASH" file + ) +' + +test_expect_success 'apply with empty conflict labels' ' + git init empty_labels && + ( + cd empty_labels && + test_commit base file && + echo stashed >file && + git stash push -m "stashed" && + test_commit upstream file && + test_must_fail git stash apply --label-ours= --label-theirs= && + test_grep "^<<<<<<<$" file && + test_grep "^>>>>>>>$" file + ) +' + test_expect_success 'stash create reports a locked index' ' test_when_finished "rm -rf repo" && git init repo &&
xdiff/xmerge.c +3 -3
@@ -199,9 +199,9 @@ static int fill_conflict_hunk(xdfenv_t *xe1, const char *name1, int size, int i, int style, xdmerge_t *m, char *dest, int marker_size) { - int marker1_size = (name1 ? strlen(name1) + 1 : 0); -int marker2_size = (name2 ?strlen (name2) +1 :0 ); -int marker3_size = (name3 ?strlen (name3) +1 :0 ); + int marker1_size = (name1 && *name1 ? strlen(name1) + 1 : 0); +int marker2_size = (name2 && *name2 ?strlen (name2) +1 :0 ); +int marker3_size = (name3 && *name3 ?strlen (name3) +1 :0 );int needs_cr =is_cr_needed (xe1, xe2, m);if (marker_size <=0 )
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v9 2/4 sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add a silent parameter to create_autostash_internal and introduce create_autostash_ref_silent so that callers can create an autostash without printing the "Created autostash" message.
--- sequencer.c | 15 +++++++++++---- sequencer.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
sequencer.c +11 -4
@@ -4657,7 +4657,8 @@ static enum todo_command peek_command(struct todo_list *todo_list, int offset)static void create_autostash_internal (struct repository *r,const char *path, -const char *refname) +const char *refname, +bool silent) {struct strbuf buf =STRBUF_INIT ;struct lock_file lock_file =LOCK_INIT ;
@@ -4702,7 +4703,8 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r, &oid, null_oid(the_hash_algo), 0, UPDATE_REFS_DIE_ON_ERR); } -printf (_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf); +if (!silent) +printf (_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf);if (reset_head (r, &ropts) <0 )die (_ ("could not reset --hard" ));discard_index (r->index);
@@ -4714,12 +4716,17 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path) { -create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL ); +create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL , false); }void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname); +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname, false); +} + +void create_autostash_ref_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname) +{ +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname, true); }static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply)
sequencer.h +1 -0
@@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ void commit_post_rewrite(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path);void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +void create_autostash_ref_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int save_autostash (const char *path);int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v9 3/4 sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add label_ours, label_theirs, and label_base parameters to the autostash apply machinery so callers can pass custom conflict marker labels through to "git stash apply --label-ours/--label-theirs/--label-base". Introduce apply_autostash_ref_with_labels() for callers that want to pass labels.
--- sequencer.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- sequencer.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
sequencer.c +27 -7
@@ -4729,7 +4729,9 @@ void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname)create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname, true); } -static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply) +static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base) {struct child_process child =CHILD_PROCESS_INIT ;int ret =0 ;
@@ -4740,6 +4742,12 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply) child.no_stderr =1 ;strvec_push (&child.args,"stash" );strvec_push (&child.args,"apply" ); +if (label_ours) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--label-ours=%s" , label_ours); +if (label_theirs) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--label-theirs=%s" , label_theirs); +if (label_base) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--label-base=%s" , label_base);strvec_push (&child.args, stash_oid); ret =run_command (&child); }
@@ -4784,7 +4792,8 @@ static int apply_save_autostash(const char *path, int attempt_apply) }strbuf_trim (&stash_oid); - ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply); + ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply, +NULL ,NULL ,NULL );unlink (path);strbuf_release (&stash_oid);
@@ -4803,11 +4812,13 @@ int apply_autostash(const char *path)int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid) { -return apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid,1 ); +return apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid,1 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); }static int apply_save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname, -int attempt_apply) +int attempt_apply, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base) {struct object_id stash_oid;char stash_oid_hex[GIT_MAX_HEXSZ +1 ];
@@ -4823,7 +4834,8 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,return error (_ ("autostash reference is a symref" ));oid_to_hex_r (stash_oid_hex, &stash_oid); - ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply); + ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply, + label_ours, label_theirs, label_base);refs_delete_ref (get_main_ref_store (r),"" , refname, &stash_oid,REF_NO_DEREF );
@@ -4833,12 +4845,20 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,0 ); +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,0 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); }int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 ); +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); +} + +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base) +{ +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 , + label_ours, label_theirs, label_base); } static int checkout_onto(struct repository *r, struct replay_opts *opts,
sequencer.h +3 -0
@@ -236,6 +236,9 @@ int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid);int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base);#define SUMMARY_INITIAL_COMMIT (1 << 0)#define SUMMARY_SHOW_AUTHOR_DATE (1 << 1)
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v9 4/4 checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
When switching branches with "git checkout -m", local modifications can block the switch. Teach the -m flow to create a temporary stash before switching and reapply it after. On success, only "Applied autostash." is shown. If reapplying causes conflicts, the stash is kept and the user is told they can resolve and run "git stash drop", or run "git reset --hard" and later "git stash pop" to recover their changes.
--- Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 58 +++++----- Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 33 +++--- builtin/checkout.c | 138 ++++++++++------------ sequencer.c | 18 ++- t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh | 24 +++- t/t7201-co.sh | 195 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t7600-merge.sh | 2 +- xdiff-interface.c | 12 ++ xdiff-interface.h | 1 + 9 files changed, 346 insertions(+), 135 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +31 -27
@@ -251,20 +251,19 @@ working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc. are different between the current branch and the branch to which you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in order to preserve your modifications in context. - However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current - branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch - is done, and you will be on the new branch. -+ -When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting -paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge -should result in deletion of the path). + With this option, the conflicting local changes are + automatically stashed before the switch and reapplied + afterwards. If the local changes do not overlap with the + differences between branches, the switch proceeds without + stashing. If reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the + entry is saved to the stash list. Resolve the conflicts + and run `git stash drop` when done, or clear the working + tree (e.g. with `git reset --hard`) before running `git stash + pop` later to re-apply your changes. + When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate the conflicted merge in the specified paths. This option cannot be used when checking out paths from a tree-ish. -+ -When switching branches with `--merge`, staged changes may be lost. `--conflict=<style>`:: The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
@@ -578,39 +577,44 @@ $ git checkout mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a -three-way merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would carry your local +changes to the new branch: ------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Switched to branch 'mytopic' ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch. === 3. Merge conflict -When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with -the `-m` option, you would see something like this: +When the `--merge` (`-m`) option is in effect and the locally +modified files overlap with files that need to be updated by the +branch switch, the changes are stashed and reapplied after the +switch. If this process results in conflicts, a stash entry is saved +and made available in `git stash list`: ------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz -ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz -fatal: merge program failed ------------- +Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry +forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: -At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in -the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted -files. Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with -`git add` as usual: + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. ------------ -$ edit frotz -$ git add frotz ------------- + +You can try resolving the conflicts now. Edit the conflicting files +and mark them resolved with `git add` as usual, then run `git stash +drop` to discard the stash entry. Alternatively, you can clear the +working tree with `git reset --hard` and recover your local changes +later with `git stash pop`. CONFIGURATION -------------
Documentation/git-switch.adoc +17 -16
@@ -123,18 +123,19 @@ variable. `-m`:: `--merge`:: - If you have local modifications to one or more files that are - different between the current branch and the branch to which - you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in - order to preserve your modifications in context. However, - with this option, a three-way merge between the current - branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch is - done, and you will be on the new branch. -+ -When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting -paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge -should result in deletion of the path). + If you have local modifications to one or more files that + are different between the current branch and the branch to + which you are switching, the command normally refuses to + switch branches in order to preserve your modifications in + context. However, with this option, the conflicting local + changes are automatically stashed before the switch and + reapplied afterwards. If the local changes do not overlap + with the differences between branches, the switch proceeds + without stashing. If reapplying the stash results in + conflicts, the entry is saved to the stash list. Resolve + the conflicts and run `git stash drop` when done, or clear + the working tree (e.g. with `git reset --hard`) before + running `git stash pop` later to re-apply your changes. `--conflict=<style>`:: The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
@@ -217,15 +218,15 @@ $ git switch mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a three-way -merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would carry your local +changes to the new branch: ------------ $ git switch -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Switched to branch 'mytopic' ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
builtin/checkout.c +58 -80
205 lines not on this page · raw message
sequencer.c +13 -5
@@ -4766,15 +4766,23 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply,strvec_push (&store.args, stash_oid);if (run_command (&store)) ret =error (_ ("cannot store %s" ), stash_oid); +else if (attempt_apply) +fprintf (stderr, +_ ("Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry\n" +"forward your local changes resulted in conflicts:\n" +"\n" +" - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them\n" +" successfully, discard the stash entry with \"git stash drop\".\n" +"\n" +" - Alternatively you can \"git reset --hard\" if you do not want\n" +" to deal with them right now, and later \"git stash pop\" to\n" +" recover your local changes.\n" ));else fprintf (stderr, -_ ("%s\n" +_ ("Autostash exists; creating a new stash entry.\n" "Your changes are safe in the stash.\n" "You can run \"git stash pop\" or" -" \"git stash drop\" at any time.\n" ), - attempt_apply ? -_ ("Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." ) : -_ ("Autostash exists; creating a new stash entry." )); +" \"git stash drop\" at any time.\n" )); }return ret;
t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh +18 -6
@@ -61,18 +61,30 @@ create_expected_failure_apply () { First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... Applying: second commit Applying: third commit - Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. - Your changes are safe in the stash. - You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. + Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry + forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: + + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. EOF } create_expected_failure_merge () { cat >expected <<-EOF $(grep "^Created autostash: [0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*\$" actual) - Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. - Your changes are safe in the stash. - You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. + Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry + forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: + + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/rebased-feature-branch. EOF }
t/t7201-co.sh +195 -0
201 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t7600-merge.sh +1 -1
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ test_expect_success 'merge with conflicted --autostash changes' ' git diff >expect && test_when_finished "test_might_fail git stash drop" && git merge --autostash c3 2>err && - test_grep "Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." err && + test_grep "your local changes resulted in conflicts" err && git show HEAD:file >merge-result && test_cmp result.1-9 merge-result && git stash show -p >actual &&
xdiff-interface.c +12 -0
@@ -325,6 +325,18 @@ int parse_conflict_style_name(const char *value)return -1 ; } +const char *conflict_style_name (int style) +{ +switch (style) { +case XDL_MERGE_DIFF3 : +return "diff3" ; +case XDL_MERGE_ZEALOUS_DIFF3 : +return "zdiff3" ; +default : +return "merge" ; + } +} +int git_xmerge_style =-1 ; int git_xmerge_config(const char *var, const char *value,
xdiff-interface.h +1 -0
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ void xdiff_set_find_func(xdemitconf_t *xecfg, const char *line, int cflags);void xdiff_clear_find_func (xdemitconf_t *xecfg);struct config_context ;int parse_conflict_style_name (const char *value); +const char *conflict_style_name (int style);int git_xmerge_config (const char *var,const char *value,const struct config_context *ctx,void *cb);extern int git_xmerge_style;
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
builtin/checkout.c static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts, · line 1155
Quoted 5 lines · Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
builtin/checkout.c +3
-0if (do_merge) { ret =merge_working_tree (opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info, &writeout_error); +if (ret && opts->merge) { +create_autostash_ref_silent (the_repository, +"CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH" );
This tries to create a root-level ref called CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH, which violates the syntax rules given in gitglossary's "ref" entry:
Ref names must either start with refs/ or be located in the root of the hierarchy. For the latter, their name must follow these rules:
• The name consists of only upper-case characters or underscores.
• The name ends with "_HEAD" or is equal to "HEAD".
Our enforcement of these rules has some holes, but I have a local series to fix that (which is how I noticed the problem). The entry continues to list some exceptions:
There are some irregular refs in the root of the hierarchy that do not match these rules. The following list is exhaustive and shall not be extended in the future:
• AUTO_MERGE
• BISECT_EXPECTED_REV
• NOTES_MERGE_PARTIAL
• NOTES_MERGE_REF
• MERGE_AUTOSTASH
We can add CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH to the list of exceptions, but I wonder if there is another name we could use that would conform to the usual rules.
-Peff
Quoted 9 lines
This tries to create a root-level ref called
CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH, which violates the syntax rules given in gitglossary's "ref" entry:Ref names must either start with refs/ or be located in the root of the hierarchy. For the latter, their name must follow these rules:
• The name consists of only upper-case characters or underscores.
• The name ends with "
_HEAD" or is equal to "HEAD".
So maybe easiest is just to rename it to CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH_HEAD?
Harald
Quoted 6 lines · Harald Nordgren
Quoted 6 lines
This tries to create a root-level ref called
CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH, which violates the syntax rules given in gitglossary's "ref" entry:Ref names must either start with refs/ or be located in the root of the hierarchy. For the latter, their name must follow these rules:
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
• The name consists of only upper-case characters or underscores.
• The name ends with "
_HEAD" or is equal to "HEAD".So maybe easiest is just to rename it to
CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH_HEAD?
Yeah, that is syntactically valid, if a mouthful. I can't offhand think of a shorter variant.
-Peff
Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
In reply to Jeff KingQuoted 14 lines · Jeff King
Our enforcement of these rules has some holes, but I have a local series to fix that (which is how I noticed the problem). The entry continues to list some exceptions:
There are some irregular refs in the root of the hierarchy that do not match these rules. The following list is exhaustive and shall not be extended in the future:
•
AUTO_MERGE•
BISECT_EXPECTED_REV•
NOTES_MERGE_PARTIAL
Quoted 7 lines
•
NOTES_MERGE_REF•
MERGE_AUTOSTASHWe can add
CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASHto the list of exceptions, but I wonder if there is another name we could use that would conform to the usual rules.
Actually, I misread the documentation I quoted as "list is not exhaustive". ;) So we would be violating its promise to add CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH to the list.
-Peff
Re: [PATCH v9 0/4] checkout: 'autostash' for branch switching
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetQuoted 9 lines · Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
- stash: add --ours-label, --theirs-label, --base-label for apply
+ stash: add --label-ours, --label-theirs, --label-base for apply
...-+`--ours-label=<label>`:: -+`--theirs-label=<label>`:: -+`--base-label=<label>`:: ++`--label-ours=<label>`:: ++`--label-theirs=<label>`:: ++`--label-base=<label>`::
I guess it is a good change that makes things align better . One potential downside is that "--labels-o<TAB>" is slightly longer than "--ours-l<TAB>", but I do not mind too much either way.
Quoted 6 lines
@@ sequencer.c: static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,
- printf(_("Created autostash: %s\n"), buf.buf);
+ if (!silent)
-+ fprintf(stderr, _("Created autostash: %s\n"), buf.buf);
++ printf(_("Created autostash: %s\n"), buf.buf);Keeping the behaviour of shared code path unchanged would be a safer move, I guess. Sending progress-like messages that are meant for human consumption to the standard error stream may be a good change but should not be part of this topic, I think.
v10 cover checkout: 'autostash' for branch switching
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetHarald Nordgren (4):
stash: add --label-ours, --label-theirs, --label-base for apply
sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker
labels
checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 58 +++++----- Documentation/git-stash.adoc | 11 +- Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 33 +++--- builtin/checkout.c | 138 ++++++++++------------ builtin/stash.c | 32 ++++-- sequencer.c | 67 ++++++++--- sequencer.h | 4 + t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh | 24 +++- t/t3903-stash.sh | 29 +++++ t/t7201-co.sh | 195 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t7600-merge.sh | 2 +- xdiff-interface.c | 12 ++ xdiff-interface.h | 1 + xdiff/xmerge.c | 6 +- 14 files changed, 455 insertions(+), 157 deletions(-)
base-commit: 8c9303b1ffae5b745d1b0a1f98330cf7944d8db0
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-2234%2FHaraldNordgren%2Fcheckout_autostash-v10
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-2234/HaraldNordgren/checkout_autostash-v10
Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/2234
Range-diff vs v9:
1: 5d5dc1f60e = 1: aa519c50be stash: add --label-ours, --label-theirs, --label-base for apply
2: a1fa04a965 = 2: 8173a4eb72 sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
3: 87216a633b = 3: f36fedd8c2 sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels
4: 00e0b3196c ! 4: b6e5546d74 checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
ret = merge_working_tree(opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info, &writeout_error);
+ if (ret && opts->merge) {
+ create_autostash_ref_silent(the_repository,
-+ "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH");
++ "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH_HEAD");
+ created_autostash = 1;
+ ret = merge_working_tree(opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info, &writeout_error);
+ }
if (ret) {
+ apply_autostash_ref_with_labels(the_repository,
-+ "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH",
++ "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH_HEAD",
+ new_branch_info->name,
+ "local",
+ stash_label_base);
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
+ git_config_push_parameter(cfg.buf);
+ strbuf_release(&cfg);
+ }
-+ apply_autostash_ref_with_labels(the_repository, "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH",
++ apply_autostash_ref_with_labels(the_repository, "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH_HEAD",
+ new_branch_info->name, "local",
+ stash_label_base);
+Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v10 1/4 stash: add --label-ours, --label-theirs, --label-base for apply
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Allow callers of "git stash apply" to pass custom labels for conflict markers instead of the default "Updated upstream" and "Stashed changes". Document the new options and add a test.
--- Documentation/git-stash.adoc | 11 ++++++++++- builtin/stash.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- t/t3903-stash.sh | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ xdiff/xmerge.c | 6 +++--- 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-stash.adoc +10 -1
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ git stash list [<log-options>] git stash show [-u | --include-untracked | --only-untracked] [<diff-options>] [<stash>] git stash drop [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] git stash pop [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] -git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] +git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--label-ours=<label>] [--label-theirs=<label>] [--label-base=<label>] [<stash>] git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>] git stash [push] [-p | --patch] [-S | --staged] [-k | --[no-]keep-index] [-q | --quiet] [-u | --include-untracked] [-a | --all] [(-m | --message) <message>]
@@ -195,6 +195,15 @@ the index's ones. However, this can fail, when you have conflicts (which are stored in the index, where you therefore can no longer apply the changes as they were originally). +`--label-ours=<label>`:: +`--label-theirs=<label>`:: +`--label-base=<label>`:: + These options are only valid for the `apply` command. ++ +Use the given labels in conflict markers instead of the default +"Updated upstream", "Stashed changes", and "Stash base". +`--label-base` only has an effect with merge.conflictStyle=diff3. + `-k`:: `--keep-index`:: `--no-keep-index`::
builtin/stash.c +25 -7
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@#define BUILTIN_STASH_POP_USAGE \ N_("git stash pop [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_APPLY_USAGE \ - N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]") + N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--label-ours=<label>] [--label-theirs=<label>] [--label-base=<label>] [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_BRANCH_USAGE \ N_("git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_STORE_USAGE \
@@ -590,8 +590,11 @@ static void unstage_changes_unless_new(struct object_id *orig_tree)die (_ ("could not write index" )); } -static int do_apply_stash (const char *prefix,struct stash_info *info, -int index,int quiet) +static int do_apply_stash_with_labels (const char *prefix, +struct stash_info *info, +int index,int quiet, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base) {int clean, ret;int has_index = index;
@@ -643,9 +646,9 @@ static int do_apply_stash(const char *prefix, struct stash_info *info,init_ui_merge_options (&o, the_repository); - o.branch1 ="Updated upstream" ; - o.branch2 ="Stashed changes" ; - o.ancestor ="Stash base" ; + o.branch1 = label_ours ? label_ours :"Updated upstream" ; + o.branch2 = label_theirs ? label_theirs :"Stashed changes" ; + o.ancestor = label_base ? label_base :"Stash base" ;if (oideq (&info->b_tree, &c_tree)) o.branch1 ="Version stash was based on" ;
@@ -717,17 +720,31 @@ restore_untracked:return ret; } +static int do_apply_stash (const char *prefix,struct stash_info *info, +int index,int quiet) +{ +return do_apply_stash_with_labels (prefix, info, index, quiet, +NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); +} +static int apply_stash (int argc,const char **argv,const char *prefix, struct repository *repo UNUSED) {int ret =-1 ;int quiet =0 ;int index = use_index; +const char *label_ours =NULL , *label_theirs =NULL , *label_base =NULL ;struct stash_info info =STASH_INFO_INIT ;struct option options[] = {OPT__QUIET (&quiet,N_ ("be quiet, only report errors" )),OPT_BOOL (0 ,"index" , &index,N_ ("attempt to recreate the index" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"label-ours" , &label_ours,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the upstream side in conflict markers" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"label-theirs" , &label_theirs,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the stashed side in conflict markers" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"label-base" , &label_base,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the base in diff3 conflict markers" )),OPT_END () };
@@ -737,7 +754,8 @@ static int apply_stash(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,if (get_stash_info (&info, argc, argv)) goto cleanup; - ret =do_apply_stash (prefix, &info, index, quiet); + ret =do_apply_stash_with_labels (prefix, &info, index, quiet, + label_ours, label_theirs, label_base); cleanup:free_stash_info (&info);return ret;
t/t3903-stash.sh +29 -0
@@ -1666,6 +1666,35 @@ test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' ' ) ' +test_expect_success 'apply with custom conflict labels' ' + git init conflict_labels && + ( + cd conflict_labels && + test_commit base file && + echo stashed >file && + git stash push -m "stashed" && + test_commit upstream file && + test_must_fail git -c merge.conflictStyle=diff3 stash apply --label-ours=UP --label-theirs=STASH && + test_grep "^<<<<<<< UP" file && + test_grep "^||||||| Stash base" file && + test_grep "^>>>>>>> STASH" file + ) +' + +test_expect_success 'apply with empty conflict labels' ' + git init empty_labels && + ( + cd empty_labels && + test_commit base file && + echo stashed >file && + git stash push -m "stashed" && + test_commit upstream file && + test_must_fail git stash apply --label-ours= --label-theirs= && + test_grep "^<<<<<<<$" file && + test_grep "^>>>>>>>$" file + ) +' + test_expect_success 'stash create reports a locked index' ' test_when_finished "rm -rf repo" && git init repo &&
xdiff/xmerge.c +3 -3
@@ -199,9 +199,9 @@ static int fill_conflict_hunk(xdfenv_t *xe1, const char *name1, int size, int i, int style, xdmerge_t *m, char *dest, int marker_size) { - int marker1_size = (name1 ? strlen(name1) + 1 : 0); -int marker2_size = (name2 ?strlen (name2) +1 :0 ); -int marker3_size = (name3 ?strlen (name3) +1 :0 ); + int marker1_size = (name1 && *name1 ? strlen(name1) + 1 : 0); +int marker2_size = (name2 && *name2 ?strlen (name2) +1 :0 ); +int marker3_size = (name3 && *name3 ?strlen (name3) +1 :0 );int needs_cr =is_cr_needed (xe1, xe2, m);if (marker_size <=0 )
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v10 2/4 sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add a silent parameter to create_autostash_internal and introduce create_autostash_ref_silent so that callers can create an autostash without printing the "Created autostash" message.
--- sequencer.c | 15 +++++++++++---- sequencer.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
sequencer.c +11 -4
@@ -4657,7 +4657,8 @@ static enum todo_command peek_command(struct todo_list *todo_list, int offset)static void create_autostash_internal (struct repository *r,const char *path, -const char *refname) +const char *refname, +bool silent) {struct strbuf buf =STRBUF_INIT ;struct lock_file lock_file =LOCK_INIT ;
@@ -4702,7 +4703,8 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r, &oid, null_oid(the_hash_algo), 0, UPDATE_REFS_DIE_ON_ERR); } -printf (_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf); +if (!silent) +printf (_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf);if (reset_head (r, &ropts) <0 )die (_ ("could not reset --hard" ));discard_index (r->index);
@@ -4714,12 +4716,17 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path) { -create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL ); +create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL , false); }void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname); +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname, false); +} + +void create_autostash_ref_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname) +{ +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname, true); }static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply)
sequencer.h +1 -0
@@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ void commit_post_rewrite(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path);void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +void create_autostash_ref_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int save_autostash (const char *path);int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v10 3/4 sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add label_ours, label_theirs, and label_base parameters to the autostash apply machinery so callers can pass custom conflict marker labels through to "git stash apply --label-ours/--label-theirs/--label-base". Introduce apply_autostash_ref_with_labels() for callers that want to pass labels.
--- sequencer.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- sequencer.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
sequencer.c +27 -7
@@ -4729,7 +4729,9 @@ void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname)create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname, true); } -static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply) +static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base) {struct child_process child =CHILD_PROCESS_INIT ;int ret =0 ;
@@ -4740,6 +4742,12 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply) child.no_stderr =1 ;strvec_push (&child.args,"stash" );strvec_push (&child.args,"apply" ); +if (label_ours) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--label-ours=%s" , label_ours); +if (label_theirs) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--label-theirs=%s" , label_theirs); +if (label_base) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--label-base=%s" , label_base);strvec_push (&child.args, stash_oid); ret =run_command (&child); }
@@ -4784,7 +4792,8 @@ static int apply_save_autostash(const char *path, int attempt_apply) }strbuf_trim (&stash_oid); - ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply); + ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply, +NULL ,NULL ,NULL );unlink (path);strbuf_release (&stash_oid);
@@ -4803,11 +4812,13 @@ int apply_autostash(const char *path)int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid) { -return apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid,1 ); +return apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid,1 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); }static int apply_save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname, -int attempt_apply) +int attempt_apply, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base) {struct object_id stash_oid;char stash_oid_hex[GIT_MAX_HEXSZ +1 ];
@@ -4823,7 +4834,8 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,return error (_ ("autostash reference is a symref" ));oid_to_hex_r (stash_oid_hex, &stash_oid); - ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply); + ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply, + label_ours, label_theirs, label_base);refs_delete_ref (get_main_ref_store (r),"" , refname, &stash_oid,REF_NO_DEREF );
@@ -4833,12 +4845,20 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,0 ); +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,0 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); }int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 ); +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); +} + +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base) +{ +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 , + label_ours, label_theirs, label_base); } static int checkout_onto(struct repository *r, struct replay_opts *opts,
sequencer.h +3 -0
@@ -236,6 +236,9 @@ int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid);int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base);#define SUMMARY_INITIAL_COMMIT (1 << 0)#define SUMMARY_SHOW_AUTHOR_DATE (1 << 1)
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v10 4/4 checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
When switching branches with "git checkout -m", local modifications can block the switch. Teach the -m flow to create a temporary stash before switching and reapply it after. On success, only "Applied autostash." is shown. If reapplying causes conflicts, the stash is kept and the user is told they can resolve and run "git stash drop", or run "git reset --hard" and later "git stash pop" to recover their changes.
--- Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 58 +++++----- Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 33 +++--- builtin/checkout.c | 138 ++++++++++------------ sequencer.c | 18 ++- t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh | 24 +++- t/t7201-co.sh | 195 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t7600-merge.sh | 2 +- xdiff-interface.c | 12 ++ xdiff-interface.h | 1 + 9 files changed, 346 insertions(+), 135 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +31 -27
@@ -251,20 +251,19 @@ working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc. are different between the current branch and the branch to which you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in order to preserve your modifications in context. - However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current - branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch - is done, and you will be on the new branch. -+ -When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting -paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge -should result in deletion of the path). + With this option, the conflicting local changes are + automatically stashed before the switch and reapplied + afterwards. If the local changes do not overlap with the + differences between branches, the switch proceeds without + stashing. If reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the + entry is saved to the stash list. Resolve the conflicts + and run `git stash drop` when done, or clear the working + tree (e.g. with `git reset --hard`) before running `git stash + pop` later to re-apply your changes. + When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate the conflicted merge in the specified paths. This option cannot be used when checking out paths from a tree-ish. -+ -When switching branches with `--merge`, staged changes may be lost. `--conflict=<style>`:: The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
@@ -578,39 +577,44 @@ $ git checkout mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a -three-way merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would carry your local +changes to the new branch: ------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Switched to branch 'mytopic' ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch. === 3. Merge conflict -When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with -the `-m` option, you would see something like this: +When the `--merge` (`-m`) option is in effect and the locally +modified files overlap with files that need to be updated by the +branch switch, the changes are stashed and reapplied after the +switch. If this process results in conflicts, a stash entry is saved +and made available in `git stash list`: ------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz -ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz -fatal: merge program failed ------------- +Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry +forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: -At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in -the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted -files. Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with -`git add` as usual: + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. ------------ -$ edit frotz -$ git add frotz ------------- + +You can try resolving the conflicts now. Edit the conflicting files +and mark them resolved with `git add` as usual, then run `git stash +drop` to discard the stash entry. Alternatively, you can clear the +working tree with `git reset --hard` and recover your local changes +later with `git stash pop`. CONFIGURATION -------------
Documentation/git-switch.adoc +17 -16
@@ -123,18 +123,19 @@ variable. `-m`:: `--merge`:: - If you have local modifications to one or more files that are - different between the current branch and the branch to which - you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in - order to preserve your modifications in context. However, - with this option, a three-way merge between the current - branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch is - done, and you will be on the new branch. -+ -When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting -paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge -should result in deletion of the path). + If you have local modifications to one or more files that + are different between the current branch and the branch to + which you are switching, the command normally refuses to + switch branches in order to preserve your modifications in + context. However, with this option, the conflicting local + changes are automatically stashed before the switch and + reapplied afterwards. If the local changes do not overlap + with the differences between branches, the switch proceeds + without stashing. If reapplying the stash results in + conflicts, the entry is saved to the stash list. Resolve + the conflicts and run `git stash drop` when done, or clear + the working tree (e.g. with `git reset --hard`) before + running `git stash pop` later to re-apply your changes. `--conflict=<style>`:: The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
@@ -217,15 +218,15 @@ $ git switch mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a three-way -merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would carry your local +changes to the new branch: ------------ $ git switch -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Switched to branch 'mytopic' ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
builtin/checkout.c +58 -80
205 lines not on this page · raw message
sequencer.c +13 -5
@@ -4766,15 +4766,23 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply,strvec_push (&store.args, stash_oid);if (run_command (&store)) ret =error (_ ("cannot store %s" ), stash_oid); +else if (attempt_apply) +fprintf (stderr, +_ ("Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry\n" +"forward your local changes resulted in conflicts:\n" +"\n" +" - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them\n" +" successfully, discard the stash entry with \"git stash drop\".\n" +"\n" +" - Alternatively you can \"git reset --hard\" if you do not want\n" +" to deal with them right now, and later \"git stash pop\" to\n" +" recover your local changes.\n" ));else fprintf (stderr, -_ ("%s\n" +_ ("Autostash exists; creating a new stash entry.\n" "Your changes are safe in the stash.\n" "You can run \"git stash pop\" or" -" \"git stash drop\" at any time.\n" ), - attempt_apply ? -_ ("Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." ) : -_ ("Autostash exists; creating a new stash entry." )); +" \"git stash drop\" at any time.\n" )); }return ret;
t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh +18 -6
@@ -61,18 +61,30 @@ create_expected_failure_apply () { First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... Applying: second commit Applying: third commit - Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. - Your changes are safe in the stash. - You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. + Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry + forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: + + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. EOF } create_expected_failure_merge () { cat >expected <<-EOF $(grep "^Created autostash: [0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*\$" actual) - Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. - Your changes are safe in the stash. - You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. + Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry + forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: + + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/rebased-feature-branch. EOF }
t/t7201-co.sh +195 -0
201 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t7600-merge.sh +1 -1
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ test_expect_success 'merge with conflicted --autostash changes' ' git diff >expect && test_when_finished "test_might_fail git stash drop" && git merge --autostash c3 2>err && - test_grep "Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." err && + test_grep "your local changes resulted in conflicts" err && git show HEAD:file >merge-result && test_cmp result.1-9 merge-result && git stash show -p >actual &&
xdiff-interface.c +12 -0
@@ -325,6 +325,18 @@ int parse_conflict_style_name(const char *value)return -1 ; } +const char *conflict_style_name (int style) +{ +switch (style) { +case XDL_MERGE_DIFF3 : +return "diff3" ; +case XDL_MERGE_ZEALOUS_DIFF3 : +return "zdiff3" ; +default : +return "merge" ; + } +} +int git_xmerge_style =-1 ; int git_xmerge_config(const char *var, const char *value,
xdiff-interface.h +1 -0
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ void xdiff_set_find_func(xdemitconf_t *xecfg, const char *line, int cflags);void xdiff_clear_find_func (xdemitconf_t *xecfg);struct config_context ;int parse_conflict_style_name (const char *value); +const char *conflict_style_name (int style);int git_xmerge_config (const char *var,const char *value,const struct config_context *ctx,void *cb);extern int git_xmerge_style;
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v10 0/4] checkout: 'autostash' for branch switching
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetQuoted 8 lines · Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
4:
00e0b3196c! 4:b6e5546d74checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts, ret = merge_working_tree(opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info, &writeout_error); + if (ret && opts->merge) { + create_autostash_ref_silent(the_repository, -+ "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH"); ++ "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH_HEAD");[...]
Thanks, I can confirm that this version is fine with the stricter ref-syntax checks.
-Peff
Re: [PATCH v10 0/4] checkout: 'autostash' for branch switching
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetQuoted 6 lines · Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
Harald Nordgren (4):
stash: add --label-ours, --label-theirs, --label-base for apply
sequencer: allowcreate_autostashto run silently
sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker
labels
checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
I have been trying this in my real workflow and noticed only one minor annoyance, which is that the stash entry only says "autostash", which is not very illuminating.
Because I almost always have either 'master' or 'next' checked out, when I start outlining a "how about this" kind of change, they are made on top of these branches, but when I say "checkout -m topic" after that, I _know_ that the rough draft change that becomes a stash entry is meant to be part of the "topic", either to extend it or refine it. Because the code that creates the stash entry knows that we were in the process of moving to 'topic', it would be nice to see the name of the branch we are moving to (i.e., 'topic') on the title, e.g., "autostash while switching to 'topic'".
Other than that, it is a very pleasant usability enhancement.
Thanks.
Quoted 9 lines
Because I almost always have either 'master' or 'next' checked out, when I start outlining a "how about this" kind of change, they are made on top of these branches, but when I say "checkout -m topic" after that, I _know_ that the rough draft change that becomes a stash entry is meant to be part of the "topic", either to extend it or refine it. Because the code that creates the stash entry knows that we were in the process of moving to 'topic', it would be nice to see the name of the branch we are moving to (i.e., 'topic') on the title, e.g., "autostash while switching to 'topic'".
Sounds reasonable, but wouldn't it make more sense to call it "autostash from master". We should still be able to abort the merge and merge it to some other branch. I feel like the source is more relevant than the destination, no?
Harald
Quoted 4 lines · Harald Nordgren
Sounds reasonable, but wouldn't it make more sense to call it "autostash from master". We should still be able to abort the merge and merge it to some other branch. I feel like the source is more relevant than the destination, no?
The new comment is for reminder, so "I made this while switching from 'master' to this new 'topic'" theoretically has more reminding value than "I made this while switching to this new 'topic'". As I outlined my workflow, I usually am on 'master' or 'next' when I end up needing "co -m" option, so "I was on 'master' when I stashed this" has a much weaker reminding value. Just like a series of "autostash" without any context comment irritated me, I'll see many "autostash on master" that I cannot quite distinguish.
But that may be just me.
Quoted 16 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 4 lines · Harald Nordgren
Sounds reasonable, but wouldn't it make more sense to call it "autostash from master". We should still be able to abort the merge and merge it to some other branch. I feel like the source is more relevant than the destination, no?
The new comment is for reminder, so "I made this while switching from 'master' to this new 'topic'" theoretically has more reminding value than "I made this while switching to this new 'topic'". As I outlined my workflow, I usually am on 'master' or 'next' when I end up needing "co -m" option, so "I was on 'master' when I stashed this" has a much weaker reminding value. Just like a series of "autostash" without any context comment irritated me, I'll see many "autostash on master" that I cannot quite distinguish.
Quoted 1 line
But that may be just me.
In any case, the topic is already in 'next' and this kind of minor tweaks are best done as a separate topic once the basic framework that works reasonably well is established on top. We may end up wanting some mechanism to customize the message in the end but that is something we will find out and become able to decide on the best design only after we let users use it for a while.
Thanks.
Quoted 16 lines · Junio C Hamano
Quoted 4 lines · Harald Nordgren
Sounds reasonable, but wouldn't it make more sense to call it "autostash from master". We should still be able to abort the merge and merge it to some other branch. I feel like the source is more relevant than the destination, no?
The new comment is for reminder, so "I made this while switching from 'master' to this new 'topic'" theoretically has more reminding value than "I made this while switching to this new 'topic'". As I outlined my workflow, I usually am on 'master' or 'next' when I end up needing "co -m" option, so "I was on 'master' when I stashed this" has a much weaker reminding value. Just like a series of "autostash" without any context comment irritated me, I'll see many "autostash on master" that I cannot quite distinguish.
Quoted 1 line
But that may be just me.
Thinking about it a bit more, I doubt it would be just me.
The whole point of "git checkout -m other-branch" is "oops, I started working on this thing while I am on <this> branch, but all of this changes are irrelevant in the context of this branch and I realize that they are better done in the context of that other branch". So as a name that reminds readers of "git stash list" what this particular stash entry is about, the name of that other branch you were switching to is much more relevant than the branch you were on when you started working on.
v11 cover checkout: 'autostash' for branch switching
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetHarald Nordgren (4):
stash: add --label-ours, --label-theirs, --label-base for apply
sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker
labels
checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 58 ++++----- Documentation/git-stash.adoc | 11 +- Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 33 ++--- builtin/checkout.c | 147 ++++++++++------------ builtin/stash.c | 32 +++-- sequencer.c | 87 ++++++++++--- sequencer.h | 8 ++ t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh | 24 +++- t/t3903-stash.sh | 29 +++++ t/t7201-co.sh | 208 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t7600-merge.sh | 2 +- xdiff-interface.c | 12 ++ xdiff-interface.h | 1 + xdiff/xmerge.c | 6 +- 14 files changed, 499 insertions(+), 159 deletions(-)
base-commit: 9e8f4e9c04e3efa494e78b710e0c5f6cc77a0a5e
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-2234%2FHaraldNordgren%2Fcheckout_autostash-v11
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-2234/HaraldNordgren/checkout_autostash-v11
Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/2234
Range-diff vs v10:
1: aa519c50be = 1: 9ab5431b47 stash: add --label-ours, --label-theirs, --label-base for apply
2: 8173a4eb72 = 2: e7f8328e3c sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
3: f36fedd8c2 = 3: 3242fd3261 sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels
4: b6e5546d74 ! 4: 97a5d87c81 checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
int do_merge = 1;
+ int created_autostash = 0;
+ struct strbuf old_commit_shortname = STRBUF_INIT;
++ struct strbuf autostash_msg = STRBUF_INIT;
+ const char *stash_label_base = NULL;
trace2_cmd_mode("branch");
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
if (do_merge) {
ret = merge_working_tree(opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info, &writeout_error);
+ if (ret && opts->merge) {
-+ create_autostash_ref_silent(the_repository,
-+ "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH_HEAD");
++ strbuf_addf(&autostash_msg,
++ "autostash while switching to '%s'",
++ new_branch_info->name);
++ create_autostash_ref_silent_with_msg(the_repository,
++ "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH_HEAD",
++ autostash_msg.buf);
+ created_autostash = 1;
+ ret = merge_working_tree(opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info, &writeout_error);
+ }
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
+ "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH_HEAD",
+ new_branch_info->name,
+ "local",
-+ stash_label_base);
++ stash_label_base,
++ autostash_msg.len ? autostash_msg.buf : NULL);
branch_info_release(&old_branch_info);
+ strbuf_release(&old_commit_shortname);
++ strbuf_release(&autostash_msg);
return ret;
}
}
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
+ }
+ apply_autostash_ref_with_labels(the_repository, "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH_HEAD",
+ new_branch_info->name, "local",
-+ stash_label_base);
++ stash_label_base,
++ autostash_msg.len ? autostash_msg.buf : NULL);
+
+ discard_index(the_repository->index);
+ if (repo_read_index(the_repository) < 0)
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
ret = post_checkout_hook(old_branch_info.commit, new_branch_info->commit, 1);
branch_info_release(&old_branch_info);
+ strbuf_release(&old_commit_shortname);
++ strbuf_release(&autostash_msg);
return ret || writeout_error;
}
## sequencer.c ##
+@@ sequencer.c: static enum todo_command peek_command(struct todo_list *todo_list, int offset)
+ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,
+ const char *path,
+ const char *refname,
++ const char *message,
+ bool silent)
+ {
+ struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
+@@ sequencer.c: static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,
+ struct object_id oid;
+
+ strvec_pushl(&stash.args,
+- "stash", "create", "autostash", NULL);
++ "stash", "create",
++ message ? message : "autostash", NULL);
+ stash.git_cmd = 1;
+ stash.no_stdin = 1;
+ strbuf_reset(&buf);
+@@ sequencer.c: static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,
+
+ void create_autostash(struct repository *r, const char *path)
+ {
+- create_autostash_internal(r, path, NULL, false);
++ create_autostash_internal(r, path, NULL, NULL, false);
+ }
+
+ void create_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
+ {
+- create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, false);
++ create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, NULL, false);
+ }
+
+ void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
+ {
+- create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, true);
++ create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, NULL, true);
++}
++
++void create_autostash_ref_silent_with_msg(struct repository *r,
++ const char *refname,
++ const char *message)
++{
++ create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, message, true);
+ }
+
+ static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply,
+ const char *label_ours, const char *label_theirs,
+- const char *label_base)
++ const char *label_base,
++ const char *stash_msg)
+ {
+ struct child_process child = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
+ int ret = 0;
@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply,
+ strvec_push(&store.args, "stash");
+ strvec_push(&store.args, "store");
+ strvec_push(&store.args, "-m");
+- strvec_push(&store.args, "autostash");
++ strvec_push(&store.args, stash_msg ? stash_msg : "autostash");
+ strvec_push(&store.args, "-q");
strvec_push(&store.args, stash_oid);
if (run_command(&store))
ret = error(_("cannot store %s"), stash_oid);
@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int atte
}
return ret;
+@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash(const char *path, int attempt_apply)
+ strbuf_trim(&stash_oid);
+
+ ret = apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply,
+- NULL, NULL, NULL);
++ NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+
+ unlink(path);
+ strbuf_release(&stash_oid);
+@@ sequencer.c: int apply_autostash(const char *path)
+
+ int apply_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid)
+ {
+- return apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL);
++ return apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+ }
+
+ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
+ int attempt_apply,
+ const char *label_ours, const char *label_theirs,
+- const char *label_base)
++ const char *label_base,
++ const char *stash_msg)
+ {
+ struct object_id stash_oid;
+ char stash_oid_hex[GIT_MAX_HEXSZ + 1];
+@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
+
+ oid_to_hex_r(stash_oid_hex, &stash_oid);
+ ret = apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply,
+- label_ours, label_theirs, label_base);
++ label_ours, label_theirs, label_base,
++ stash_msg);
+
+ refs_delete_ref(get_main_ref_store(r), "", refname,
+ &stash_oid, REF_NO_DEREF);
+@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
+
+ int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
+ {
+- return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL);
++ return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 0,
++ NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+ }
+
+ int apply_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
+ {
+- return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL);
++ return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 1,
++ NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+ }
+
+ int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
+ const char *label_ours, const char *label_theirs,
+- const char *label_base)
++ const char *label_base,
++ const char *stash_msg)
+ {
+ return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 1,
+- label_ours, label_theirs, label_base);
++ label_ours, label_theirs, label_base,
++ stash_msg);
+ }
+
+ static int checkout_onto(struct repository *r, struct replay_opts *opts,
+
+ ## sequencer.h ##
+@@ sequencer.h: void commit_post_rewrite(struct repository *r,
+ void create_autostash(struct repository *r, const char *path);
+ void create_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);
+ void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname);
++void create_autostash_ref_silent_with_msg(struct repository *r,
++ const char *refname,
++ const char *message);
+ int save_autostash(const char *path);
+ int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);
+ int apply_autostash(const char *path);
+@@ sequencer.h: int apply_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid);
+ int apply_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);
+ int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
+ const char *label_ours, const char *label_theirs,
+- const char *label_base);
++ const char *label_base,
++ const char *stash_msg);
+
+ #define SUMMARY_INITIAL_COMMIT (1 << 0)
+ #define SUMMARY_SHOW_AUTHOR_DATE (1 << 1)
## t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh ##
@@ t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh: create_expected_failure_apply () {
@@ t/t7201-co.sh: test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>'
+ test_cmp expect one
+'
+
++test_expect_success 'checkout -m autostash message includes target branch' '
++ git checkout -f main &&
++ git clean -f &&
++
++ fill 1 2 3 4 5 >one &&
++ git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 &&
++ git stash list >stash-list &&
++ test_grep "autostash while switching to .side." stash-list &&
++ git stash drop &&
++ git checkout -f main &&
++ git reset --hard
++'
++
+test_expect_success 'checkout -m stashes on staged conflicting changes' '
+ git checkout -f main &&
+ git clean -f &&Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v11 1/4 stash: add --label-ours, --label-theirs, --label-base for apply
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Allow callers of "git stash apply" to pass custom labels for conflict markers instead of the default "Updated upstream" and "Stashed changes". Document the new options and add a test.
--- Documentation/git-stash.adoc | 11 ++++++++++- builtin/stash.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- t/t3903-stash.sh | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ xdiff/xmerge.c | 6 +++--- 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-stash.adoc +10 -1
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ git stash list [<log-options>] git stash show [-u | --include-untracked | --only-untracked] [<diff-options>] [<stash>] git stash drop [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] git stash pop [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] -git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] +git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--label-ours=<label>] [--label-theirs=<label>] [--label-base=<label>] [<stash>] git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>] git stash [push] [-p | --patch] [-S | --staged] [-k | --[no-]keep-index] [-q | --quiet] [-u | --include-untracked] [-a | --all] [(-m | --message) <message>]
@@ -195,6 +195,15 @@ the index's ones. However, this can fail, when you have conflicts (which are stored in the index, where you therefore can no longer apply the changes as they were originally). +`--label-ours=<label>`:: +`--label-theirs=<label>`:: +`--label-base=<label>`:: + These options are only valid for the `apply` command. ++ +Use the given labels in conflict markers instead of the default +"Updated upstream", "Stashed changes", and "Stash base". +`--label-base` only has an effect with merge.conflictStyle=diff3. + `-k`:: `--keep-index`:: `--no-keep-index`::
builtin/stash.c +25 -7
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@#define BUILTIN_STASH_POP_USAGE \ N_("git stash pop [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_APPLY_USAGE \ - N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]") + N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--label-ours=<label>] [--label-theirs=<label>] [--label-base=<label>] [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_BRANCH_USAGE \ N_("git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_STORE_USAGE \
@@ -590,8 +590,11 @@ static void unstage_changes_unless_new(struct object_id *orig_tree)die (_ ("could not write index" )); } -static int do_apply_stash (const char *prefix,struct stash_info *info, -int index,int quiet) +static int do_apply_stash_with_labels (const char *prefix, +struct stash_info *info, +int index,int quiet, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base) {int clean, ret;int has_index = index;
@@ -643,9 +646,9 @@ static int do_apply_stash(const char *prefix, struct stash_info *info,init_ui_merge_options (&o, the_repository); - o.branch1 ="Updated upstream" ; - o.branch2 ="Stashed changes" ; - o.ancestor ="Stash base" ; + o.branch1 = label_ours ? label_ours :"Updated upstream" ; + o.branch2 = label_theirs ? label_theirs :"Stashed changes" ; + o.ancestor = label_base ? label_base :"Stash base" ;if (oideq (&info->b_tree, &c_tree)) o.branch1 ="Version stash was based on" ;
@@ -717,17 +720,31 @@ restore_untracked:return ret; } +static int do_apply_stash (const char *prefix,struct stash_info *info, +int index,int quiet) +{ +return do_apply_stash_with_labels (prefix, info, index, quiet, +NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); +} +static int apply_stash (int argc,const char **argv,const char *prefix, struct repository *repo UNUSED) {int ret =-1 ;int quiet =0 ;int index = use_index; +const char *label_ours =NULL , *label_theirs =NULL , *label_base =NULL ;struct stash_info info =STASH_INFO_INIT ;struct option options[] = {OPT__QUIET (&quiet,N_ ("be quiet, only report errors" )),OPT_BOOL (0 ,"index" , &index,N_ ("attempt to recreate the index" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"label-ours" , &label_ours,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the upstream side in conflict markers" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"label-theirs" , &label_theirs,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the stashed side in conflict markers" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"label-base" , &label_base,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the base in diff3 conflict markers" )),OPT_END () };
@@ -737,7 +754,8 @@ static int apply_stash(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,if (get_stash_info (&info, argc, argv)) goto cleanup; - ret =do_apply_stash (prefix, &info, index, quiet); + ret =do_apply_stash_with_labels (prefix, &info, index, quiet, + label_ours, label_theirs, label_base); cleanup:free_stash_info (&info);return ret;
t/t3903-stash.sh +29 -0
@@ -1666,6 +1666,35 @@ test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' ' ) ' +test_expect_success 'apply with custom conflict labels' ' + git init conflict_labels && + ( + cd conflict_labels && + test_commit base file && + echo stashed >file && + git stash push -m "stashed" && + test_commit upstream file && + test_must_fail git -c merge.conflictStyle=diff3 stash apply --label-ours=UP --label-theirs=STASH && + test_grep "^<<<<<<< UP" file && + test_grep "^||||||| Stash base" file && + test_grep "^>>>>>>> STASH" file + ) +' + +test_expect_success 'apply with empty conflict labels' ' + git init empty_labels && + ( + cd empty_labels && + test_commit base file && + echo stashed >file && + git stash push -m "stashed" && + test_commit upstream file && + test_must_fail git stash apply --label-ours= --label-theirs= && + test_grep "^<<<<<<<$" file && + test_grep "^>>>>>>>$" file + ) +' + test_expect_success 'stash create reports a locked index' ' test_when_finished "rm -rf repo" && git init repo &&
xdiff/xmerge.c +3 -3
@@ -199,9 +199,9 @@ static int fill_conflict_hunk(xdfenv_t *xe1, const char *name1, int size, int i, int style, xdmerge_t *m, char *dest, int marker_size) { - int marker1_size = (name1 ? strlen(name1) + 1 : 0); -int marker2_size = (name2 ?strlen (name2) +1 :0 ); -int marker3_size = (name3 ?strlen (name3) +1 :0 ); + int marker1_size = (name1 && *name1 ? strlen(name1) + 1 : 0); +int marker2_size = (name2 && *name2 ?strlen (name2) +1 :0 ); +int marker3_size = (name3 && *name3 ?strlen (name3) +1 :0 );int needs_cr =is_cr_needed (xe1, xe2, m);if (marker_size <=0 )
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v11 2/4 sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add a silent parameter to create_autostash_internal and introduce create_autostash_ref_silent so that callers can create an autostash without printing the "Created autostash" message.
--- sequencer.c | 15 +++++++++++---- sequencer.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
sequencer.c +11 -4
@@ -4657,7 +4657,8 @@ static enum todo_command peek_command(struct todo_list *todo_list, int offset)static void create_autostash_internal (struct repository *r,const char *path, -const char *refname) +const char *refname, +bool silent) {struct strbuf buf =STRBUF_INIT ;struct lock_file lock_file =LOCK_INIT ;
@@ -4702,7 +4703,8 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r, &oid, null_oid(the_hash_algo), 0, UPDATE_REFS_DIE_ON_ERR); } -printf (_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf); +if (!silent) +printf (_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf);if (reset_head (r, &ropts) <0 )die (_ ("could not reset --hard" ));discard_index (r->index);
@@ -4714,12 +4716,17 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path) { -create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL ); +create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL , false); }void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname); +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname, false); +} + +void create_autostash_ref_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname) +{ +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname, true); }static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply)
sequencer.h +1 -0
@@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ void commit_post_rewrite(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path);void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +void create_autostash_ref_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int save_autostash (const char *path);int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v11 3/4 sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add label_ours, label_theirs, and label_base parameters to the autostash apply machinery so callers can pass custom conflict marker labels through to "git stash apply --label-ours/--label-theirs/--label-base". Introduce apply_autostash_ref_with_labels() for callers that want to pass labels.
--- sequencer.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- sequencer.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
sequencer.c +27 -7
@@ -4729,7 +4729,9 @@ void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname)create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname, true); } -static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply) +static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base) {struct child_process child =CHILD_PROCESS_INIT ;int ret =0 ;
@@ -4740,6 +4742,12 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply) child.no_stderr =1 ;strvec_push (&child.args,"stash" );strvec_push (&child.args,"apply" ); +if (label_ours) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--label-ours=%s" , label_ours); +if (label_theirs) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--label-theirs=%s" , label_theirs); +if (label_base) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--label-base=%s" , label_base);strvec_push (&child.args, stash_oid); ret =run_command (&child); }
@@ -4784,7 +4792,8 @@ static int apply_save_autostash(const char *path, int attempt_apply) }strbuf_trim (&stash_oid); - ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply); + ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply, +NULL ,NULL ,NULL );unlink (path);strbuf_release (&stash_oid);
@@ -4803,11 +4812,13 @@ int apply_autostash(const char *path)int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid) { -return apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid,1 ); +return apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid,1 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); }static int apply_save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname, -int attempt_apply) +int attempt_apply, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base) {struct object_id stash_oid;char stash_oid_hex[GIT_MAX_HEXSZ +1 ];
@@ -4823,7 +4834,8 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,return error (_ ("autostash reference is a symref" ));oid_to_hex_r (stash_oid_hex, &stash_oid); - ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply); + ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply, + label_ours, label_theirs, label_base);refs_delete_ref (get_main_ref_store (r),"" , refname, &stash_oid,REF_NO_DEREF );
@@ -4833,12 +4845,20 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,0 ); +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,0 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); }int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 ); +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); +} + +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base) +{ +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 , + label_ours, label_theirs, label_base); } static int checkout_onto(struct repository *r, struct replay_opts *opts,
sequencer.h +3 -0
@@ -236,6 +236,9 @@ int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid);int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base);#define SUMMARY_INITIAL_COMMIT (1 << 0)#define SUMMARY_SHOW_AUTHOR_DATE (1 << 1)
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v11 4/4 checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
When switching branches with "git checkout -m", local modifications can block the switch. Teach the -m flow to create a temporary stash before switching and reapply it after. On success, only "Applied autostash." is shown. If reapplying causes conflicts, the stash is kept and the user is told they can resolve and run "git stash drop", or run "git reset --hard" and later "git stash pop" to recover their changes.
--- Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 58 ++++----- Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 33 ++--- builtin/checkout.c | 147 ++++++++++------------ sequencer.c | 62 +++++++--- sequencer.h | 6 +- t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh | 24 +++- t/t7201-co.sh | 208 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t7600-merge.sh | 2 +- xdiff-interface.c | 12 ++ xdiff-interface.h | 1 + 10 files changed, 403 insertions(+), 150 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +31 -27
@@ -251,20 +251,19 @@ working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc. are different between the current branch and the branch to which you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in order to preserve your modifications in context. - However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current - branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch - is done, and you will be on the new branch. -+ -When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting -paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge -should result in deletion of the path). + With this option, the conflicting local changes are + automatically stashed before the switch and reapplied + afterwards. If the local changes do not overlap with the + differences between branches, the switch proceeds without + stashing. If reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the + entry is saved to the stash list. Resolve the conflicts + and run `git stash drop` when done, or clear the working + tree (e.g. with `git reset --hard`) before running `git stash + pop` later to re-apply your changes. + When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate the conflicted merge in the specified paths. This option cannot be used when checking out paths from a tree-ish. -+ -When switching branches with `--merge`, staged changes may be lost. `--conflict=<style>`:: The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
@@ -578,39 +577,44 @@ $ git checkout mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a -three-way merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would carry your local +changes to the new branch: ------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Switched to branch 'mytopic' ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch. === 3. Merge conflict -When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with -the `-m` option, you would see something like this: +When the `--merge` (`-m`) option is in effect and the locally +modified files overlap with files that need to be updated by the +branch switch, the changes are stashed and reapplied after the +switch. If this process results in conflicts, a stash entry is saved +and made available in `git stash list`: ------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz -ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz -fatal: merge program failed ------------- +Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry +forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: -At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in -the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted -files. Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with -`git add` as usual: + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. ------------ -$ edit frotz -$ git add frotz ------------- + +You can try resolving the conflicts now. Edit the conflicting files +and mark them resolved with `git add` as usual, then run `git stash +drop` to discard the stash entry. Alternatively, you can clear the +working tree with `git reset --hard` and recover your local changes +later with `git stash pop`. CONFIGURATION -------------
Documentation/git-switch.adoc +17 -16
@@ -123,18 +123,19 @@ variable. `-m`:: `--merge`:: - If you have local modifications to one or more files that are - different between the current branch and the branch to which - you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in - order to preserve your modifications in context. However, - with this option, a three-way merge between the current - branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch is - done, and you will be on the new branch. -+ -When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting -paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge -should result in deletion of the path). + If you have local modifications to one or more files that + are different between the current branch and the branch to + which you are switching, the command normally refuses to + switch branches in order to preserve your modifications in + context. However, with this option, the conflicting local + changes are automatically stashed before the switch and + reapplied afterwards. If the local changes do not overlap + with the differences between branches, the switch proceeds + without stashing. If reapplying the stash results in + conflicts, the entry is saved to the stash list. Resolve + the conflicts and run `git stash drop` when done, or clear + the working tree (e.g. with `git reset --hard`) before + running `git stash pop` later to re-apply your changes. `--conflict=<style>`:: The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
@@ -217,15 +218,15 @@ $ git switch mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a three-way -merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would carry your local +changes to the new branch: ------------ $ git switch -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Switched to branch 'mytopic' ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
builtin/checkout.c +67 -80
214 lines not on this page · raw message
sequencer.c +43 -19
145 lines not on this page · raw message
sequencer.h +5 -1
@@ -231,6 +231,9 @@ void commit_post_rewrite(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path);void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname);void create_autostash_ref_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +void create_autostash_ref_silent_with_msg (struct repository *r, +const char *refname, +const char *message);int save_autostash (const char *path);int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);
@@ -238,7 +241,8 @@ int apply_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid);int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname,const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, -const char *label_base); +const char *label_base, +const char *stash_msg);#define SUMMARY_INITIAL_COMMIT (1 << 0)#define SUMMARY_SHOW_AUTHOR_DATE (1 << 1)
t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh +18 -6
@@ -61,18 +61,30 @@ create_expected_failure_apply () { First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... Applying: second commit Applying: third commit - Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. - Your changes are safe in the stash. - You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. + Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry + forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: + + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. EOF } create_expected_failure_merge () { cat >expected <<-EOF $(grep "^Created autostash: [0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*\$" actual) - Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. - Your changes are safe in the stash. - You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. + Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry + forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: + + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/rebased-feature-branch. EOF }
t/t7201-co.sh +208 -0
214 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t7600-merge.sh +1 -1
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ test_expect_success 'merge with conflicted --autostash changes' ' git diff >expect && test_when_finished "test_might_fail git stash drop" && git merge --autostash c3 2>err && - test_grep "Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." err && + test_grep "your local changes resulted in conflicts" err && git show HEAD:file >merge-result && test_cmp result.1-9 merge-result && git stash show -p >actual &&
xdiff-interface.c +12 -0
@@ -325,6 +325,18 @@ int parse_conflict_style_name(const char *value)return -1 ; } +const char *conflict_style_name (int style) +{ +switch (style) { +case XDL_MERGE_DIFF3 : +return "diff3" ; +case XDL_MERGE_ZEALOUS_DIFF3 : +return "zdiff3" ; +default : +return "merge" ; + } +} +int git_xmerge_style =-1 ; int git_xmerge_config(const char *var, const char *value,
xdiff-interface.h +1 -0
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ void xdiff_set_find_func(xdemitconf_t *xecfg, const char *line, int cflags);void xdiff_clear_find_func (xdemitconf_t *xecfg);struct config_context ;int parse_conflict_style_name (const char *value); +const char *conflict_style_name (int style);int git_xmerge_config (const char *var,const char *value,const struct config_context *ctx,void *cb);extern int git_xmerge_style;
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
v12 cover checkout: 'autostash' for branch switching
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetHarald Nordgren (4):
stash: add --label-ours, --label-theirs, --label-base for apply
sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker
labels
checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 58 ++++----- Documentation/git-stash.adoc | 11 +- Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 33 ++--- builtin/checkout.c | 147 ++++++++++------------ builtin/stash.c | 32 +++-- sequencer.c | 81 ++++++++++--- sequencer.h | 6 + t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh | 24 +++- t/t3903-stash.sh | 29 +++++ t/t7201-co.sh | 208 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t7600-merge.sh | 2 +- xdiff-interface.c | 12 ++ xdiff-interface.h | 1 + xdiff/xmerge.c | 6 +- 14 files changed, 491 insertions(+), 159 deletions(-)
base-commit: 9e8f4e9c04e3efa494e78b710e0c5f6cc77a0a5e
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-git-2234%2FHaraldNordgren%2Fcheckout_autostash-v12
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-git-2234/HaraldNordgren/checkout_autostash-v12
Pull-Request: https://github.com/git/git/pull/2234
Range-diff vs v11:
1: 9ab5431b47 = 1: 9ab5431b47 stash: add --label-ours, --label-theirs, --label-base for apply
2: e7f8328e3c ! 2: e11a622bdf sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
@@ sequencer.c: static enum todo_command peek_command(struct todo_list *todo_list,
const char *path,
- const char *refname)
+ const char *refname,
++ const char *message,
+ bool silent)
{
struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
struct lock_file lock_file = LOCK_INIT;
+@@ sequencer.c: static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,
+ struct object_id oid;
+
+ strvec_pushl(&stash.args,
+- "stash", "create", "autostash", NULL);
++ "stash", "create",
++ message ? message : "autostash", NULL);
+ stash.git_cmd = 1;
+ stash.no_stdin = 1;
+ strbuf_reset(&buf);
@@ sequencer.c: static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,
&oid, null_oid(the_hash_algo), 0, UPDATE_REFS_DIE_ON_ERR);
}
@@ sequencer.c: static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,
void create_autostash(struct repository *r, const char *path)
{
- create_autostash_internal(r, path, NULL);
-+ create_autostash_internal(r, path, NULL, false);
++ create_autostash_internal(r, path, NULL, NULL, false);
}
void create_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
{
- create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname);
-+ create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, false);
++ create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, NULL, false);
+}
+
-+void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
++void create_autostash_ref_with_msg_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
++ const char *message)
+{
-+ create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, true);
++ create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, message, true);
}
static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply)
@@ sequencer.h: void commit_post_rewrite(struct repository *r,
void create_autostash(struct repository *r, const char *path);
void create_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);
-+void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname);
++void create_autostash_ref_with_msg_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
++ const char *message);
int save_autostash(const char *path);
int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);
int apply_autostash(const char *path);
3: 3242fd3261 ! 3: 4593745e90 sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels
@@ Commit message
Signed-off-by: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
## sequencer.c ##
-@@ sequencer.c: void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
- create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, true);
+@@ sequencer.c: void create_autostash_ref_with_msg_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refn
+ create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, message, true);
}
-static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply)
+static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply,
+ const char *label_ours, const char *label_theirs,
-+ const char *label_base)
++ const char *label_base,
++ const char *stash_msg)
{
struct child_process child = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
int ret = 0;
@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int atte
strvec_push(&child.args, stash_oid);
ret = run_command(&child);
}
+@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply)
+ strvec_push(&store.args, "stash");
+ strvec_push(&store.args, "store");
+ strvec_push(&store.args, "-m");
+- strvec_push(&store.args, "autostash");
++ strvec_push(&store.args, stash_msg ? stash_msg : "autostash");
+ strvec_push(&store.args, "-q");
+ strvec_push(&store.args, stash_oid);
+ if (run_command(&store))
@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash(const char *path, int attempt_apply)
}
strbuf_trim(&stash_oid);
- ret = apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply);
+ ret = apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply,
-+ NULL, NULL, NULL);
++ NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
unlink(path);
strbuf_release(&stash_oid);
@@ sequencer.c: int apply_autostash(const char *path)
int apply_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid)
{
- return apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid, 1);
-+ return apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL);
++ return apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
}
static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
- int attempt_apply)
+ int attempt_apply,
+ const char *label_ours, const char *label_theirs,
-+ const char *label_base)
++ const char *label_base,
++ const char *stash_msg)
{
struct object_id stash_oid;
char stash_oid_hex[GIT_MAX_HEXSZ + 1];
@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const cha
oid_to_hex_r(stash_oid_hex, &stash_oid);
- ret = apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply);
+ ret = apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply,
-+ label_ours, label_theirs, label_base);
++ label_ours, label_theirs, label_base,
++ stash_msg);
refs_delete_ref(get_main_ref_store(r), "", refname,
&stash_oid, REF_NO_DEREF);
@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const cha
int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
{
- return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 0);
-+ return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL);
++ return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 0,
++ NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
}
int apply_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
{
- return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 1);
-+ return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL);
++ return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 1,
++ NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
+}
+
+int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
+ const char *label_ours, const char *label_theirs,
-+ const char *label_base)
++ const char *label_base,
++ const char *stash_msg)
+{
+ return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 1,
-+ label_ours, label_theirs, label_base);
++ label_ours, label_theirs, label_base,
++ stash_msg);
}
static int checkout_onto(struct repository *r, struct replay_opts *opts,
@@ sequencer.h: int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);
int apply_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);
+int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
+ const char *label_ours, const char *label_theirs,
-+ const char *label_base);
++ const char *label_base,
++ const char *stash_msg);
#define SUMMARY_INITIAL_COMMIT (1 << 0)
#define SUMMARY_SHOW_AUTHOR_DATE (1 << 1) 4: 97a5d87c81 ! 4: 911e520431 checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
+ strbuf_addf(&autostash_msg,
+ "autostash while switching to '%s'",
+ new_branch_info->name);
-+ create_autostash_ref_silent_with_msg(the_repository,
-+ "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH_HEAD",
-+ autostash_msg.buf);
++ create_autostash_ref_with_msg_silent(the_repository,
++ "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH_HEAD",
++ autostash_msg.buf);
+ created_autostash = 1;
+ ret = merge_working_tree(opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info, &writeout_error);
+ }
@@ builtin/checkout.c: static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,
}
## sequencer.c ##
-@@ sequencer.c: static enum todo_command peek_command(struct todo_list *todo_list, int offset)
- static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,
- const char *path,
- const char *refname,
-+ const char *message,
- bool silent)
- {
- struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
-@@ sequencer.c: static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,
- struct object_id oid;
-
- strvec_pushl(&stash.args,
-- "stash", "create", "autostash", NULL);
-+ "stash", "create",
-+ message ? message : "autostash", NULL);
- stash.git_cmd = 1;
- stash.no_stdin = 1;
- strbuf_reset(&buf);
-@@ sequencer.c: static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,
-
- void create_autostash(struct repository *r, const char *path)
- {
-- create_autostash_internal(r, path, NULL, false);
-+ create_autostash_internal(r, path, NULL, NULL, false);
- }
-
- void create_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
- {
-- create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, false);
-+ create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, NULL, false);
- }
-
- void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
- {
-- create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, true);
-+ create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, NULL, true);
-+}
-+
-+void create_autostash_ref_silent_with_msg(struct repository *r,
-+ const char *refname,
-+ const char *message)
-+{
-+ create_autostash_internal(r, NULL, refname, message, true);
- }
-
- static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply,
- const char *label_ours, const char *label_theirs,
-- const char *label_base)
-+ const char *label_base,
-+ const char *stash_msg)
- {
- struct child_process child = CHILD_PROCESS_INIT;
- int ret = 0;
@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply,
- strvec_push(&store.args, "stash");
- strvec_push(&store.args, "store");
- strvec_push(&store.args, "-m");
-- strvec_push(&store.args, "autostash");
-+ strvec_push(&store.args, stash_msg ? stash_msg : "autostash");
- strvec_push(&store.args, "-q");
strvec_push(&store.args, stash_oid);
if (run_command(&store))
ret = error(_("cannot store %s"), stash_oid);
@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int atte
}
return ret;
-@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash(const char *path, int attempt_apply)
- strbuf_trim(&stash_oid);
-
- ret = apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply,
-- NULL, NULL, NULL);
-+ NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
-
- unlink(path);
- strbuf_release(&stash_oid);
-@@ sequencer.c: int apply_autostash(const char *path)
-
- int apply_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid)
- {
-- return apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL);
-+ return apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
- }
-
- static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
- int attempt_apply,
- const char *label_ours, const char *label_theirs,
-- const char *label_base)
-+ const char *label_base,
-+ const char *stash_msg)
- {
- struct object_id stash_oid;
- char stash_oid_hex[GIT_MAX_HEXSZ + 1];
-@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname, -
- oid_to_hex_r(stash_oid_hex, &stash_oid);
- ret = apply_save_autostash_oid(stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply,
-- label_ours, label_theirs, label_base);
-+ label_ours, label_theirs, label_base,
-+ stash_msg);
-
- refs_delete_ref(get_main_ref_store(r), "", refname,
- &stash_oid, REF_NO_DEREF);
-@@ sequencer.c: static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname, -
- int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
- {
-- return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 0, NULL, NULL, NULL);
-+ return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 0,
-+ NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
- }
-
- int apply_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname)
- {
-- return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 1, NULL, NULL, NULL);
-+ return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 1,
-+ NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
- }
-
- int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
- const char *label_ours, const char *label_theirs,
-- const char *label_base)
-+ const char *label_base,
-+ const char *stash_msg)
- {
- return apply_save_autostash_ref(r, refname, 1,
-- label_ours, label_theirs, label_base);
-+ label_ours, label_theirs, label_base,
-+ stash_msg);
- }
-
- static int checkout_onto(struct repository *r, struct replay_opts *opts,
-
- ## sequencer.h ##
-@@ sequencer.h: void commit_post_rewrite(struct repository *r,
- void create_autostash(struct repository *r, const char *path);
- void create_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);
- void create_autostash_ref_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refname); -+void create_autostash_ref_silent_with_msg(struct repository *r,
-+ const char *refname,
-+ const char *message);
- int save_autostash(const char *path);
- int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);
- int apply_autostash(const char *path);
-@@ sequencer.h: int apply_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid);
- int apply_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);
- int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels(struct repository *r, const char *refname,
- const char *label_ours, const char *label_theirs,
-- const char *label_base);
-+ const char *label_base,
-+ const char *stash_msg);
-
- #define SUMMARY_INITIAL_COMMIT (1 << 0)
- #define SUMMARY_SHOW_AUTHOR_DATE (1 << 1)
## t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh ##
@@ t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh: create_expected_failure_apply () {
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
PATCH v12 1/4 stash: add --label-ours, --label-theirs, --label-base for apply
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Allow callers of "git stash apply" to pass custom labels for conflict markers instead of the default "Updated upstream" and "Stashed changes". Document the new options and add a test.
--- Documentation/git-stash.adoc | 11 ++++++++++- builtin/stash.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------- t/t3903-stash.sh | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ xdiff/xmerge.c | 6 +++--- 4 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-stash.adoc +10 -1
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ git stash list [<log-options>] git stash show [-u | --include-untracked | --only-untracked] [<diff-options>] [<stash>] git stash drop [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] git stash pop [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] -git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>] +git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--label-ours=<label>] [--label-theirs=<label>] [--label-base=<label>] [<stash>] git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>] git stash [push] [-p | --patch] [-S | --staged] [-k | --[no-]keep-index] [-q | --quiet] [-u | --include-untracked] [-a | --all] [(-m | --message) <message>]
@@ -195,6 +195,15 @@ the index's ones. However, this can fail, when you have conflicts (which are stored in the index, where you therefore can no longer apply the changes as they were originally). +`--label-ours=<label>`:: +`--label-theirs=<label>`:: +`--label-base=<label>`:: + These options are only valid for the `apply` command. ++ +Use the given labels in conflict markers instead of the default +"Updated upstream", "Stashed changes", and "Stash base". +`--label-base` only has an effect with merge.conflictStyle=diff3. + `-k`:: `--keep-index`:: `--no-keep-index`::
builtin/stash.c +25 -7
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@#define BUILTIN_STASH_POP_USAGE \ N_("git stash pop [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_APPLY_USAGE \ - N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [<stash>]") + N_("git stash apply [--index] [-q | --quiet] [--label-ours=<label>] [--label-theirs=<label>] [--label-base=<label>] [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_BRANCH_USAGE \ N_("git stash branch <branchname> [<stash>]")#define BUILTIN_STASH_STORE_USAGE \
@@ -590,8 +590,11 @@ static void unstage_changes_unless_new(struct object_id *orig_tree)die (_ ("could not write index" )); } -static int do_apply_stash (const char *prefix,struct stash_info *info, -int index,int quiet) +static int do_apply_stash_with_labels (const char *prefix, +struct stash_info *info, +int index,int quiet, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base) {int clean, ret;int has_index = index;
@@ -643,9 +646,9 @@ static int do_apply_stash(const char *prefix, struct stash_info *info,init_ui_merge_options (&o, the_repository); - o.branch1 ="Updated upstream" ; - o.branch2 ="Stashed changes" ; - o.ancestor ="Stash base" ; + o.branch1 = label_ours ? label_ours :"Updated upstream" ; + o.branch2 = label_theirs ? label_theirs :"Stashed changes" ; + o.ancestor = label_base ? label_base :"Stash base" ;if (oideq (&info->b_tree, &c_tree)) o.branch1 ="Version stash was based on" ;
@@ -717,17 +720,31 @@ restore_untracked:return ret; } +static int do_apply_stash (const char *prefix,struct stash_info *info, +int index,int quiet) +{ +return do_apply_stash_with_labels (prefix, info, index, quiet, +NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); +} +static int apply_stash (int argc,const char **argv,const char *prefix, struct repository *repo UNUSED) {int ret =-1 ;int quiet =0 ;int index = use_index; +const char *label_ours =NULL , *label_theirs =NULL , *label_base =NULL ;struct stash_info info =STASH_INFO_INIT ;struct option options[] = {OPT__QUIET (&quiet,N_ ("be quiet, only report errors" )),OPT_BOOL (0 ,"index" , &index,N_ ("attempt to recreate the index" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"label-ours" , &label_ours,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the upstream side in conflict markers" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"label-theirs" , &label_theirs,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the stashed side in conflict markers" )), +OPT_STRING (0 ,"label-base" , &label_base,N_ ("label" ), +N_ ("label for the base in diff3 conflict markers" )),OPT_END () };
@@ -737,7 +754,8 @@ static int apply_stash(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,if (get_stash_info (&info, argc, argv)) goto cleanup; - ret =do_apply_stash (prefix, &info, index, quiet); + ret =do_apply_stash_with_labels (prefix, &info, index, quiet, + label_ours, label_theirs, label_base); cleanup:free_stash_info (&info);return ret;
t/t3903-stash.sh +29 -0
@@ -1666,6 +1666,35 @@ test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' ' ) ' +test_expect_success 'apply with custom conflict labels' ' + git init conflict_labels && + ( + cd conflict_labels && + test_commit base file && + echo stashed >file && + git stash push -m "stashed" && + test_commit upstream file && + test_must_fail git -c merge.conflictStyle=diff3 stash apply --label-ours=UP --label-theirs=STASH && + test_grep "^<<<<<<< UP" file && + test_grep "^||||||| Stash base" file && + test_grep "^>>>>>>> STASH" file + ) +' + +test_expect_success 'apply with empty conflict labels' ' + git init empty_labels && + ( + cd empty_labels && + test_commit base file && + echo stashed >file && + git stash push -m "stashed" && + test_commit upstream file && + test_must_fail git stash apply --label-ours= --label-theirs= && + test_grep "^<<<<<<<$" file && + test_grep "^>>>>>>>$" file + ) +' + test_expect_success 'stash create reports a locked index' ' test_when_finished "rm -rf repo" && git init repo &&
xdiff/xmerge.c +3 -3
@@ -199,9 +199,9 @@ static int fill_conflict_hunk(xdfenv_t *xe1, const char *name1, int size, int i, int style, xdmerge_t *m, char *dest, int marker_size) { - int marker1_size = (name1 ? strlen(name1) + 1 : 0); -int marker2_size = (name2 ?strlen (name2) +1 :0 ); -int marker3_size = (name3 ?strlen (name3) +1 :0 ); + int marker1_size = (name1 && *name1 ? strlen(name1) + 1 : 0); +int marker2_size = (name2 && *name2 ?strlen (name2) +1 :0 ); +int marker3_size = (name3 && *name3 ?strlen (name3) +1 :0 );int needs_cr =is_cr_needed (xe1, xe2, m);if (marker_size <=0 )
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v12 1/4] stash: add --label-ours, --label-theirs, --label-base for apply
Hi Harald
Quoted 13 lines · Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Allow callers of "git stash apply" to pass custom labels for conflict markers instead of the default "Updated upstream" and "Stashed changes". Document the new options and add a test.
Signed-off-by Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>[...]builtin/stash.c +0
-0
builtin/stash.c static void unstage_changes_unless_new(struct object_id *orig_tree) · line 597
Quoted 8 lines
builtin/stash.c +5
-2@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ -static int do_apply_stash (const char *prefix,struct stash_info *info, -int index,int quiet) +static int do_apply_stash_with_labels (const char *prefix, +struct stash_info *info, +int index,int quiet, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base)
There are only four callers of do_apply_stash so it might be better just to change the function signature and update the existing callers rather than adding another function.
t/t3903-stash.sh test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' ' · line 1671
Quoted 11 lines
t/t3903-stash.sh +3
-0@@ -1666,6 +1666,35 @@ test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' ' ) ' +test_expect_success 'apply with custom conflict labels' ' + git init conflict_labels && + (
I'm still unclear why we're creating a new repository here. Our test suite is slow enough already without each test spending time creating its own repository. There doesn't seem to be anything here that requires isolating the test in this way.
Apart from that everything else looks good to me
Thanks
Phillip
Quoted 46 lines
t/t3903-stash.sh +26
-0+ cd conflict_labels && + test_commit base file && + echo stashed >file && + git stash push -m "stashed" && + test_commit upstream file && + test_must_fail git -c merge.conflictStyle=diff3 stash apply --label-ours=UP --label-theirs=STASH && + test_grep "^<<<<<<< UP" file && + test_grep "^||||||| Stash base" file && + test_grep "^>>>>>>> STASH" file + ) +' + +test_expect_success 'apply with empty conflict labels' ' + git init empty_labels && + ( + cd empty_labels && + test_commit base file && + echo stashed >file && + git stash push -m "stashed" && + test_commit upstream file && + test_must_fail git stash apply --label-ours= --label-theirs= && + test_grep "^<<<<<<<$" file && + test_grep "^>>>>>>>$" file + ) +' + test_expect_success 'stash create reports a locked index' ' test_when_finished "rm -rf repo" && git init repo &&xdiff/xmerge.c +3
-3@@ -199,9 +199,9 @@ static int fill_conflict_hunk(xdfenv_t *xe1, const char *name1, int size, int i, int style, xdmerge_t *m, char *dest, int marker_size) { - int marker1_size = (name1 ? strlen(name1) + 1 : 0); -int marker2_size = (name2 ?strlen (name2) +1 :0 ); -int marker3_size = (name3 ?strlen (name3) +1 :0 ); + int marker1_size = (name1 && *name1 ? strlen(name1) + 1 : 0); +int marker2_size = (name2 && *name2 ?strlen (name2) +1 :0 ); +int marker3_size = (name3 && *name3 ?strlen (name3) +1 :0 );int needs_cr =is_cr_needed (xe1, xe2, m);if (marker_size <=0 )
Re: [PATCH v12 1/4] stash: add --label-ours, --label-theirs, --label-base for apply
Quoted 18 lines · Phillip Wood
builtin/stash.c static void unstage_changes_unless_new(struct object_id *orig_tree) · line 597
Quoted 5 lines
builtin/stash.c +5
-0+static int do_apply_stash_with_labels (const char *prefix, +struct stash_info *info, +int index,int quiet, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base)There are only four callers of
do_apply_stashso it might be better just to change the function signature and update the existing callers rather than adding another function.Quoted 8 lines
t/t3903-stash.sh +0
-0@@ -1666,6 +1666,35 @@ test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' ' ) '
Quoted 8 lines
t/t3903-stash.sh test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' ' · line 1671
Quoted 3 lines
t/t3903-stash.sh +3
-0+test_expect_success 'apply with custom conflict labels' ' + git init conflict_labels && + (I'm still unclear why we're creating a new repository here. Our test suite is slow enough already without each test spending time creating its own repository. There doesn't seem to be anything here that requires isolating the test in this way.
Both are exellent points.
I also agree with your comments on create_autostash_ref() in [2/4], extending apply_autostash_ref() with optional three or four extra parameters and updating existing callers in [3/4].
I have v10 already merged to 'next', but I think it is better to revert the merge and give these finishing touches, as we are not in a rush to add more topics to 'next' before 2.54 final anyway.
Thanks.
Quoted 3 lines
There are only four callers of
do_apply_stashso it might be better just to change the function signature and update the existing callers rather than adding another function.
Also a good point, and I will update it.
Harald
Quoted 8 lines
t/t3903-stash.sh test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' ' · line 1671
Quoted 3 lines
t/t3903-stash.sh +3
-0+test_expect_success 'apply with custom conflict labels' ' + git init conflict_labels && + (I'm still unclear why we're creating a new repository here. Our test suite is slow enough already without each test spending time creating its own repository. There doesn't seem to be anything here that requires isolating the test in this way.
Yes, I want this too, but I had some problems to get it to work. Found a way now I think, but the cleanup is not 100% trivial (this is the only reason to run anything inside a new repo).
Harald
Quoted 9 lines · Harald Nordgren
Quoted 8 lines
t/t3903-stash.sh test_expect_success 'restore untracked files even when we hit conflicts' ' · line 1671
Quoted 3 lines
t/t3903-stash.sh +3
-0+test_expect_success 'apply with custom conflict labels' ' + git init conflict_labels && + (I'm still unclear why we're creating a new repository here. Our test suite is slow enough already without each test spending time creating its own repository. There doesn't seem to be anything here that requires isolating the test in this way.
Quoted 3 lines
Yes, I want this too, but I had some problems to get it to work. Found a way now I think, but the cleanup is not 100% trivial (this is the only reason to run anything inside a new repo).
Normally the first test would setup some commits with test_commit() that creates a tag so you can just use "git reset --hard <tag>" to start your test from a known state. Unfortunately setup_stash() does not use test_commit() so there are no tags. It would be useful to fix that by adding a line that creates a tag so that future test authors do not face the same problem.
Thanks
Phillip
Quoted 6 lines
Normally the first test would setup some commits with
test_commit()that creates a tag so you can just use "git reset --hard <tag>" to start your test from a known state. Unfortunatelysetup_stash()does not usetest_commit()so there are no tags. It would be useful to fix that by adding a line that creates a tag so that future test authors do not face the same problem.
Sounds reasonable, but it's surprisingly easy to break the subsequent tests.
My solution now will be to move these tests to last in the test file.
Harald
PATCH v12 2/4 sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add a silent parameter to create_autostash_internal and introduce create_autostash_ref_silent so that callers can create an autostash without printing the "Created autostash" message.
--- sequencer.c | 20 +++++++++++++++----- sequencer.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
sequencer.c +15 -5
@@ -4657,7 +4657,9 @@ static enum todo_command peek_command(struct todo_list *todo_list, int offset)static void create_autostash_internal (struct repository *r,const char *path, -const char *refname) +const char *refname, +const char *message, +bool silent) {struct strbuf buf =STRBUF_INIT ;struct lock_file lock_file =LOCK_INIT ;
@@ -4679,7 +4681,8 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,struct object_id oid;strvec_pushl (&stash.args, -"stash" ,"create" ,"autostash" ,NULL ); +"stash" ,"create" , + message ? message :"autostash" ,NULL ); stash.git_cmd =1 ; stash.no_stdin =1 ;strbuf_reset (&buf);
@@ -4702,7 +4705,8 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r, &oid, null_oid(the_hash_algo), 0, UPDATE_REFS_DIE_ON_ERR); } -printf (_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf); +if (!silent) +printf (_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf);if (reset_head (r, &ropts) <0 )die (_ ("could not reset --hard" ));discard_index (r->index);
@@ -4714,12 +4718,18 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path) { -create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL ); +create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL ,NULL , false); }void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname); +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname,NULL , false); +} + +void create_autostash_ref_with_msg_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *message) +{ +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname, message, true); }static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply)
sequencer.h +2 -0
@@ -230,6 +230,8 @@ void commit_post_rewrite(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path);void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +void create_autostash_ref_with_msg_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *message);int save_autostash (const char *path);int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v12 2/4] sequencer: allow create_autostash to run silently
Hi Harald
Quoted 7 lines · Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add a silent parameter to
create_autostash_internaland introducecreate_autostash_ref_silentso that callers can create an autostash without printing the "Created autostash" message.Signed-off-by Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
I wonder if we should just update the two callers of create_autostash_ref() instead of adding a new function but the implementation looks sensible
Thanks
Phillip
Quoted 73 lines
sequencer.c | 20 +++++++++++++++----- sequencer.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)sequencer.c +15
-5@@ -4657,7 +4657,9 @@ static enum todo_command peek_command(struct todo_list *todo_list, int offset)static void create_autostash_internal (struct repository *r,const char *path, -const char *refname) +const char *refname, +const char *message, +bool silent) {struct strbuf buf =STRBUF_INIT ;struct lock_file lock_file =LOCK_INIT ;@@ -4679,7 +4681,8 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,struct object_id oid;strvec_pushl (&stash.args, -"stash" ,"create" ,"autostash" ,NULL ); +"stash" ,"create" , + message ? message :"autostash" ,NULL ); stash.git_cmd =1 ; stash.no_stdin =1 ;strbuf_reset (&buf);@@ -4702,7 +4705,8 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r, &oid, null_oid(the_hash_algo), 0, UPDATE_REFS_DIE_ON_ERR); } -printf (_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf); +if (!silent) +printf (_ ("Created autostash: %s\n" ), buf.buf);if (reset_head (r, &ropts) <0 )die (_ ("could not reset --hard" ));discard_index (r->index);@@ -4714,12 +4718,18 @@ static void create_autostash_internal(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path) { -create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL ); +create_autostash_internal (r, path,NULL ,NULL , false); }void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname); +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname,NULL , false); +} + +void create_autostash_ref_with_msg_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *message) +{ +create_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname, message, true); }static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply)sequencer.h +2
-0@@ -230,6 +230,8 @@ void commit_post_rewrite(struct repository *r,void create_autostash (struct repository *r,const char *path);void create_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +void create_autostash_ref_with_msg_silent (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *message);int save_autostash (const char *path);int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 7 lines
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add a silent parameter to
create_autostash_internaland introducecreate_autostash_ref_silentso that callers can create an autostash without printing the "Created autostash" message.Signed-off-by Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>I wonder if we should just update the two callers of
create_autostash_ref()instead of adding a new function but the implementation looks sensible
Good point, I will update it!
Harald
PATCH v12 3/4 sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add label_ours, label_theirs, and label_base parameters to the autostash apply machinery so callers can pass custom conflict marker labels through to "git stash apply --label-ours/--label-theirs/--label-base". Introduce apply_autostash_ref_with_labels() for callers that want to pass labels.
--- sequencer.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- sequencer.h | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
sequencer.c +35 -8
@@ -4732,7 +4732,10 @@ void create_autostash_ref_with_msg_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refncreate_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname, message, true); } -static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply) +static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base, +const char *stash_msg) {struct child_process child =CHILD_PROCESS_INIT ;int ret =0 ;
@@ -4743,6 +4746,12 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply) child.no_stderr =1 ;strvec_push (&child.args,"stash" );strvec_push (&child.args,"apply" ); +if (label_ours) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--label-ours=%s" , label_ours); +if (label_theirs) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--label-theirs=%s" , label_theirs); +if (label_base) +strvec_pushf (&child.args,"--label-base=%s" , label_base);strvec_push (&child.args, stash_oid); ret =run_command (&child); }
@@ -4756,7 +4765,7 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply)strvec_push (&store.args,"stash" );strvec_push (&store.args,"store" );strvec_push (&store.args,"-m" ); -strvec_push (&store.args,"autostash" ); +strvec_push (&store.args, stash_msg ? stash_msg :"autostash" );strvec_push (&store.args,"-q" );strvec_push (&store.args, stash_oid);if (run_command (&store))
@@ -4787,7 +4796,8 @@ static int apply_save_autostash(const char *path, int attempt_apply) }strbuf_trim (&stash_oid); - ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply); + ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid.buf, attempt_apply, +NULL ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL );unlink (path);strbuf_release (&stash_oid);
@@ -4806,11 +4816,14 @@ int apply_autostash(const char *path)int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid) { -return apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid,1 ); +return apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid,1 ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); }static int apply_save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname, -int attempt_apply) +int attempt_apply, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base, +const char *stash_msg) {struct object_id stash_oid;char stash_oid_hex[GIT_MAX_HEXSZ +1 ];
@@ -4826,7 +4839,9 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,return error (_ ("autostash reference is a symref" ));oid_to_hex_r (stash_oid_hex, &stash_oid); - ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply); + ret =apply_save_autostash_oid (stash_oid_hex, attempt_apply, + label_ours, label_theirs, label_base, + stash_msg);refs_delete_ref (get_main_ref_store (r),"" , refname, &stash_oid,REF_NO_DEREF );
@@ -4836,12 +4851,24 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname,int save_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,0 ); +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,0 , +NULL ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); }int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname) { -return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 ); +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 , +NULL ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL ); +} + +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base, +const char *stash_msg) +{ +return apply_save_autostash_ref (r, refname,1 , + label_ours, label_theirs, label_base, + stash_msg); } static int checkout_onto(struct repository *r, struct replay_opts *opts,
sequencer.h +4 -0
@@ -237,6 +237,10 @@ int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid);int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base, +const char *stash_msg);#define SUMMARY_INITIAL_COMMIT (1 << 0)#define SUMMARY_SHOW_AUTHOR_DATE (1 << 1)
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v12 3/4] sequencer: teach autostash apply to take optional conflict marker labels
Hi Harald
Quoted 15 lines · Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
Add
label_ours,label_theirs, andlabel_baseparameters to the autostash apply machinery so callers can pass custom conflict marker labels through to "git stash apply --label-ours/--label-theirs/--label-base". Introduceapply_autostash_ref_with_labels()for callers that want to pass labels.Signed-off-by Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>[...]sequencer.c +0
-0
sequencer.c void create_autostash_ref_with_msg_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refn · line 4738
Quoted 8 lines
sequencer.c +4
-1@@ -4732,7 +4732,10 @@ void create_autostash_ref_with_msg_silent(struct repository *r, const char *refncreate_autostash_internal (r,NULL , refname, message, true); } -static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply) +static int apply_save_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid,int attempt_apply, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base, +const char *stash_msg)
I'm confused why to need to provide a message when we're storing an existing stash that already has the message that we want to use.
sequencer.h int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname); · line 243
Quoted 12 lines
sequencer.h +4
-0@@ -237,6 +237,10 @@ int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid);int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base, +const char *stash_msg);
Do we need a new function, or can we just update the existing callers to pass NULL? In the future I think we'll want to pass better conflict labels and updating them now to pass NULL makes that easier.
Thanks
Phillip
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
sequencer.h +0
-0
Quoted 8 lines
sequencer.h int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname); · line 243
Quoted 8 lines
sequencer.h +4
-0@@ -237,6 +237,10 @@ int save_autostash_ref(struct repository *r, const char *refname);int apply_autostash (const char *path);int apply_autostash_oid (const char *stash_oid);int apply_autostash_ref (struct repository *r,const char *refname); +int apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (struct repository *r,const char *refname, +const char *label_ours,const char *label_theirs, +const char *label_base, +const char *stash_msg);
Fair enough, will update in the next patch!
Harald
PATCH v12 4/4 checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
In reply to Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadgetFrom: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
When switching branches with "git checkout -m", local modifications can block the switch. Teach the -m flow to create a temporary stash before switching and reapply it after. On success, only "Applied autostash." is shown. If reapplying causes conflicts, the stash is kept and the user is told they can resolve and run "git stash drop", or run "git reset --hard" and later "git stash pop" to recover their changes.
--- Documentation/git-checkout.adoc | 58 ++++----- Documentation/git-switch.adoc | 33 ++--- builtin/checkout.c | 147 ++++++++++------------ sequencer.c | 18 ++- t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh | 24 +++- t/t7201-co.sh | 208 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ t/t7600-merge.sh | 2 +- xdiff-interface.c | 12 ++ xdiff-interface.h | 1 + 9 files changed, 368 insertions(+), 135 deletions(-)
Documentation/git-checkout.adoc +31 -27
@@ -251,20 +251,19 @@ working tree, by copying them from elsewhere, extracting a tarball, etc. are different between the current branch and the branch to which you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in order to preserve your modifications in context. - However, with this option, a three-way merge between the current - branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch - is done, and you will be on the new branch. -+ -When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting -paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge -should result in deletion of the path). + With this option, the conflicting local changes are + automatically stashed before the switch and reapplied + afterwards. If the local changes do not overlap with the + differences between branches, the switch proceeds without + stashing. If reapplying the stash results in conflicts, the + entry is saved to the stash list. Resolve the conflicts + and run `git stash drop` when done, or clear the working + tree (e.g. with `git reset --hard`) before running `git stash + pop` later to re-apply your changes. + When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate the conflicted merge in the specified paths. This option cannot be used when checking out paths from a tree-ish. -+ -When switching branches with `--merge`, staged changes may be lost. `--conflict=<style>`:: The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
@@ -578,39 +577,44 @@ $ git checkout mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a -three-way merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would carry your local +changes to the new branch: ------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Switched to branch 'mytopic' ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch. === 3. Merge conflict -When a merge conflict happens during switching branches with -the `-m` option, you would see something like this: +When the `--merge` (`-m`) option is in effect and the locally +modified files overlap with files that need to be updated by the +branch switch, the changes are stashed and reapplied after the +switch. If this process results in conflicts, a stash entry is saved +and made available in `git stash list`: ------------ $ git checkout -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz -ERROR: Merge conflict in frotz -fatal: merge program failed ------------- +Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry +forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: -At this point, `git diff` shows the changes cleanly merged as in -the previous example, as well as the changes in the conflicted -files. Edit and resolve the conflict and mark it resolved with -`git add` as usual: + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. ------------ -$ edit frotz -$ git add frotz ------------- + +You can try resolving the conflicts now. Edit the conflicting files +and mark them resolved with `git add` as usual, then run `git stash +drop` to discard the stash entry. Alternatively, you can clear the +working tree with `git reset --hard` and recover your local changes +later with `git stash pop`. CONFIGURATION -------------
Documentation/git-switch.adoc +17 -16
@@ -123,18 +123,19 @@ variable. `-m`:: `--merge`:: - If you have local modifications to one or more files that are - different between the current branch and the branch to which - you are switching, the command refuses to switch branches in - order to preserve your modifications in context. However, - with this option, a three-way merge between the current - branch, your working tree contents, and the new branch is - done, and you will be on the new branch. -+ -When a merge conflict happens, the index entries for conflicting -paths are left unmerged, and you need to resolve the conflicts -and mark the resolved paths with `git add` (or `git rm` if the merge -should result in deletion of the path). + If you have local modifications to one or more files that + are different between the current branch and the branch to + which you are switching, the command normally refuses to + switch branches in order to preserve your modifications in + context. However, with this option, the conflicting local + changes are automatically stashed before the switch and + reapplied afterwards. If the local changes do not overlap + with the differences between branches, the switch proceeds + without stashing. If reapplying the stash results in + conflicts, the entry is saved to the stash list. Resolve + the conflicts and run `git stash drop` when done, or clear + the working tree (e.g. with `git reset --hard`) before + running `git stash pop` later to re-apply your changes. `--conflict=<style>`:: The same as `--merge` option above, but changes the way the
@@ -217,15 +218,15 @@ $ git switch mytopic error: You have local changes to 'frotz'; not switching branches. ------------ -You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would try a three-way -merge: +You can give the `-m` flag to the command, which would carry your local +changes to the new branch: ------------ $ git switch -m mytopic -Auto-merging frotz +Switched to branch 'mytopic' ------------ -After this three-way merge, the local modifications are _not_ +After the switch, the local modifications are reapplied and are _not_ registered in your index file, so `git diff` would show you what changes you made since the tip of the new branch.
builtin/checkout.c +67 -80
214 lines not on this page · raw message
sequencer.c +13 -5
@@ -4770,15 +4770,23 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply,strvec_push (&store.args, stash_oid);if (run_command (&store)) ret =error (_ ("cannot store %s" ), stash_oid); +else if (attempt_apply) +fprintf (stderr, +_ ("Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry\n" +"forward your local changes resulted in conflicts:\n" +"\n" +" - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them\n" +" successfully, discard the stash entry with \"git stash drop\".\n" +"\n" +" - Alternatively you can \"git reset --hard\" if you do not want\n" +" to deal with them right now, and later \"git stash pop\" to\n" +" recover your local changes.\n" ));else fprintf (stderr, -_ ("%s\n" +_ ("Autostash exists; creating a new stash entry.\n" "Your changes are safe in the stash.\n" "You can run \"git stash pop\" or" -" \"git stash drop\" at any time.\n" ), - attempt_apply ? -_ ("Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." ) : -_ ("Autostash exists; creating a new stash entry." )); +" \"git stash drop\" at any time.\n" )); }return ret;
t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh +18 -6
@@ -61,18 +61,30 @@ create_expected_failure_apply () { First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... Applying: second commit Applying: third commit - Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. - Your changes are safe in the stash. - You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. + Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry + forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: + + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. EOF } create_expected_failure_merge () { cat >expected <<-EOF $(grep "^Created autostash: [0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*\$" actual) - Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. - Your changes are safe in the stash. - You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. + Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry + forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: + + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/rebased-feature-branch. EOF }
t/t7201-co.sh +208 -0
214 lines not on this page · raw message
t/t7600-merge.sh +1 -1
@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ test_expect_success 'merge with conflicted --autostash changes' ' git diff >expect && test_when_finished "test_might_fail git stash drop" && git merge --autostash c3 2>err && - test_grep "Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." err && + test_grep "your local changes resulted in conflicts" err && git show HEAD:file >merge-result && test_cmp result.1-9 merge-result && git stash show -p >actual &&
xdiff-interface.c +12 -0
@@ -325,6 +325,18 @@ int parse_conflict_style_name(const char *value)return -1 ; } +const char *conflict_style_name (int style) +{ +switch (style) { +case XDL_MERGE_DIFF3 : +return "diff3" ; +case XDL_MERGE_ZEALOUS_DIFF3 : +return "zdiff3" ; +default : +return "merge" ; + } +} +int git_xmerge_style =-1 ; int git_xmerge_config(const char *var, const char *value,
xdiff-interface.h +1 -0
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ void xdiff_set_find_func(xdemitconf_t *xecfg, const char *line, int cflags);void xdiff_clear_find_func (xdemitconf_t *xecfg);struct config_context ;int parse_conflict_style_name (const char *value); +const char *conflict_style_name (int style);int git_xmerge_config (const char *var,const char *value,const struct config_context *ctx,void *cb);extern int git_xmerge_style;
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Re: [PATCH v12 4/4] checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
Hi Harald
For the subject line I think
checkout -m: autostash when switching branches
would be more in keeping with our usual style.
Quoted 4 lines · Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget
From: Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
When switching branches with "git checkout -m", local modifications can block the switch.
Really? Isn't the point of "checkout -m" to merge the local modifications into the branch that's being checked out?
Quoted 3 lines
Teach the -m flow to create a temporary stash
before switching and reapply it after. On success, only "Applied autostash." is shown.
and a diff of the local changes?
Quoted 6 lines
If reapplying causes conflicts, the stash is
kept and the user is told they can resolve and run "git stash drop", or run "git reset --hard" and later "git stash pop" to recover their changes.Signed-off-by Harald Nordgren <[email protected]>
I've skipped the docs as I'm short on time
Quoted 34 lines
builtin/checkout.c +9
-3@@ -783,8 +783,10 @@ static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *opts,struct tree *new_tree;repo_hold_locked_index (the_repository, &lock_file,LOCK_DIE_ON_ERROR ); -if (repo_read_index_preload (the_repository,NULL ,0 ) <0 ) +if (repo_read_index_preload (the_repository,NULL ,0 ) <0 ) { +rollback_lock_file (&lock_file);return error (_ ("index file corrupt" )); + }resolve_undo_clear_index (the_repository->index);if (opts->new_orphan_branch && opts->orphan_from_empty_tree) {@@ -797,14 +799,18 @@ static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *opts, }else { new_tree =repo_get_commit_tree (the_repository, new_branch_info->commit); -if (!new_tree) +if (!new_tree) { +rollback_lock_file (&lock_file);return error (_ ("unable to read tree (%s)" ),oid_to_hex (&new_branch_info->commit->object.oid)); + } }if (opts->discard_changes) { ret =reset_tree (new_tree, opts,1 , writeout_error, new_branch_info); -if (ret) +if (ret) { +rollback_lock_file (&lock_file);return ret; + } }else {struct tree_desc trees[2 ];struct tree *tree;
builtin/checkout.c static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *opts, · line 825
Quoted 6 lines
builtin/checkout.c +1
-0@@ -814,6 +820,7 @@ static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *opts,refresh_index (the_repository->index,REFRESH_QUIET ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL );if (unmerged_index (the_repository->index)) { +rollback_lock_file (&lock_file);error (_ ("you need to resolve your current index first" ));return 1 ;
The changes up to here look like fixes for an existing bug and so would be better in a separate patch.
Sometimes we return "1" and sometimes "-1" what does that signal to the caller?
Quoted 14 lines
builtin/checkout.c +0
-0}@@ -846,82 +853,8 @@ static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *opts, ret =unpack_trees (2 , trees, &topts);clear_unpack_trees_porcelain (&topts);if (ret ==-1 ) {[lots of deletions]
builtin/checkout.c +2
-2-if (ret) -return ret; +rollback_lock_file (&lock_file); +return 1 ; } }
builtin/checkout.c static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts, · line 1102
Quoted 4 lines
builtin/checkout.c +1
-0@@ -1166,6 +1099,10 @@ static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,struct object_id rev;int flag, writeout_error =0 ;int do_merge =1 ; +int created_autostash =0 ;
This can be a bool
Quoted 12 lines
builtin/checkout.c +5
-0+struct strbuf old_commit_shortname =STRBUF_INIT ; +struct strbuf autostash_msg =STRBUF_INIT ; +const char *stash_label_base =NULL ;trace2_cmd_mode ("branch" );@@ -1203,10 +1140,37 @@ static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts, do_merge =0 ; } +if (old_branch_info.name) + stash_label_base = old_branch_info.name;
builtin/checkout.c static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts, · line 1154
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/checkout.c +8
-0+else if (old_branch_info.commit) { +strbuf_add_unique_abbrev (&old_commit_shortname, + &old_branch_info.commit->object.oid, +DEFAULT_ABBREV ); + stash_label_base = old_commit_shortname.buf; + } +if (do_merge) { ret =merge_working_tree (opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info, &writeout_error); +if (ret && opts->merge) {
As we saw above merge_working_tree() can return non-zero for a variety of reasons. We only want to try stashing if the call to unpack_trees() failed. Even then if you look at the list of errors in unpack-trees.h you'll see that only a few of them relate to problems that can be solved by stashing. The old code just tried merging whenever unpack_trees() failed so it probably not so bad to do the same here but we should not be stashing if merge_working_tree() returns before calling unpack_trees().
builtin/checkout.c static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts, · line 1159
Quoted 5 lines
builtin/checkout.c +5
-0+strbuf_addf (&autostash_msg, +"autostash while switching to '%s'" , + new_branch_info->name); + create_autostash_ref_with_msg_silent(the_repository, + "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH_HEAD",
It's a shame we have to create a ref here. MERGE_AUTOSTASH exists so that "git merge --continue" can apply the stash once the user has resolved any merge conflicts. We don't have that problem here because there is no user interaction and we could just hold onto the stash oid in a variable.
builtin/checkout.c static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts, · line 1164
Quoted 5 lines
builtin/checkout.c +4
-0+ autostash_msg.buf); + created_autostash =1 ; + ret =merge_working_tree (opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info, &writeout_error); + }if (ret) {
I'm confused by this - if we stash then don't we expect the call to unpack_trees() in merge_working_tree() to succeed and therefore return 0? If opts->merge is false then we should not be trying to apply the stash when merge_working_tree() fails.
builtin/checkout.c static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts, · line 1170
Quoted 6 lines
builtin/checkout.c +6
-0+apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (the_repository, +"CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH_HEAD" , + new_branch_info->name, +"local" , + stash_label_base, + autostash_msg.len ? autostash_msg.buf :NULL );
Can we create an autostash without setting a message in autostash_msg?
Quoted 7 lines
builtin/checkout.c +2
-0branch_info_release (&old_branch_info); +strbuf_release (&old_commit_shortname); +strbuf_release (&autostash_msg);return ret; } }
builtin/checkout.c static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts, · line 1187
Quoted 8 lines
builtin/checkout.c +5
-0@@ -1216,8 +1180,31 @@ static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,update_refs_for_switch (opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info); +if (opts->conflict_style >=0 ) { +struct strbuf cfg =STRBUF_INIT ; +strbuf_addf (&cfg,"merge.conflictStyle=%s" , +conflict_style_name (opts->conflict_style)); +git_config_push_parameter (cfg.buf);
This is rather unfortunate - it might be nicer for create_autostash_internal() to set the conflict style.
builtin/checkout.c static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts, · line 1199
Quoted 12 lines
builtin/checkout.c +12
-0+strbuf_release (&cfg); + } +apply_autostash_ref_with_labels (the_repository,"CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH_HEAD" , + new_branch_info->name,"local" , + stash_label_base, + autostash_msg.len ? autostash_msg.buf :NULL ); + +discard_index (the_repository->index); +if (repo_read_index (the_repository) <0 ) +die (_ ("index file corrupt" )); + + if (created_autostash && !opts->discard_changes && !opts->quiet &&
Wouldn't it be a bug if we've created and autostash when opts->discard_changes is set? Why do we need to check it?
builtin/checkout.c static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts, · line 1202
Quoted 3 lines
builtin/checkout.c +3
-0+ new_branch_info->commit) +show_local_changes (&new_branch_info->commit->object, + &opts->diff_options);
So this is a change to the output when using "checkout -m"? If so it might be better as a separate change.
I'll have to leave it there for now, I'll try and look at the rest of the changes later in the week.
Thanks
Phillip
Quoted 349 lines
builtin/checkout.c +3
-0+ ret =post_checkout_hook (old_branch_info.commit, new_branch_info->commit,1 );branch_info_release (&old_branch_info); +strbuf_release (&old_commit_shortname); +strbuf_release (&autostash_msg);return ret || writeout_error; }sequencer.c +13
-5@@ -4770,15 +4770,23 @@ static int apply_save_autostash_oid(const char *stash_oid, int attempt_apply,strvec_push (&store.args, stash_oid);if (run_command (&store)) ret =error (_ ("cannot store %s" ), stash_oid); +else if (attempt_apply) +fprintf (stderr, +_ ("Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry\n" +"forward your local changes resulted in conflicts:\n" +"\n" +" - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them\n" +" successfully, discard the stash entry with \"git stash drop\".\n" +"\n" +" - Alternatively you can \"git reset --hard\" if you do not want\n" +" to deal with them right now, and later \"git stash pop\" to\n" +" recover your local changes.\n" ));else fprintf (stderr, -_ ("%s\n" +_ ("Autostash exists; creating a new stash entry.\n" "Your changes are safe in the stash.\n" "You can run \"git stash pop\" or" -" \"git stash drop\" at any time.\n" ), - attempt_apply ? -_ ("Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." ) : -_ ("Autostash exists; creating a new stash entry." )); +" \"git stash drop\" at any time.\n" )); }return ret;t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh +18
-6@@ -61,18 +61,30 @@ create_expected_failure_apply () { First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... Applying: second commit Applying: third commit - Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. - Your changes are safe in the stash. - You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. + Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry + forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: + + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. EOF } create_expected_failure_merge () { cat >expected <<-EOF $(grep "^Created autostash: [0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*\$" actual) - Applying autostash resulted in conflicts. - Your changes are safe in the stash. - You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time. + Your local changes are stashed, however, applying it to carry + forward your local changes resulted in conflicts: + + - You can try resolving them now. If you resolved them + successfully, discard the stash entry with "git stash drop". + + - Alternatively you can "git reset --hard" if you do not want + to deal with them right now, and later "git stash pop" to + recover your local changes. Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/rebased-feature-branch. EOF }t/t7201-co.sh +208
-0@@ -210,6 +210,214 @@ test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=diff3 <branch>' ' test_cmp expect two ' +test_expect_success 'checkout --merge --conflict=zdiff3 <branch>' ' + git checkout -f main && + git reset --hard && + git clean -f && + + fill a b X d e >two && + git checkout --merge --conflict=zdiff3 simple && + + cat <<-EOF >expect && + a + <<<<<<< simple + c + ||||||| main + b + c + d + ======= + b + X + d + >>>>>>> local + e + EOF + test_cmp expect two +' + +test_expect_success 'checkout -m respects merge.conflictStyle config' ' + git checkout -f main && + git reset --hard && + git clean -f && + + test_config merge.conflictStyle diff3 && + fill b d >two && + git checkout -m simple && + + cat <<-EOF >expect && + <<<<<<< simple + a + c + e + ||||||| main + a + b + c + d + e + ======= + b + d + >>>>>>> local + EOF + test_cmp expect two +' + +test_expect_success 'checkout -m skips stash when no conflict' ' + git checkout -f main && + git clean -f && + + fill 0 x y z >same && + git stash list >stash-before && + git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 && + test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual && + git stash list >stash-after && + test_cmp stash-before stash-after && + fill 0 x y z >expect && + test_cmp expect same +' + +test_expect_success 'checkout -m skips stash with non-conflicting dirty index' ' + git checkout -f main && + git clean -f && + + fill 0 x y z >same && + git add same && + git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 && + test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual && + fill 0 x y z >expect && + test_cmp expect same +' + +test_expect_success 'checkout -m stashes and applies on conflicting changes' ' + git checkout -f main && + git clean -f && + + fill 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >one && + git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 && + test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual && + test_grep "Applied autostash" actual && + fill 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >expect && + test_cmp expect one +' + +test_expect_success 'checkout -m with mixed staged and unstaged changes' ' + git checkout -f main && + git clean -f && + + fill 0 x y z >same && + git add same && + fill 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >one && + git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 && + test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual && + test_grep "Applied autostash" actual && + fill 0 x y z >expect && + test_cmp expect same && + fill 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >expect && + test_cmp expect one +' + +test_expect_success 'checkout -m stashes on truly conflicting changes' ' + git checkout -f main && + git clean -f && + + fill 1 2 3 4 5 >one && + test_must_fail git checkout side 2>stderr && + test_grep "Your local changes" stderr && + git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 && + test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual && + test_grep "resulted in conflicts" actual && + test_grep "git stash drop" actual && + git stash drop && + git reset --hard +' + +test_expect_success 'checkout -m produces usable stash on conflict' ' + git checkout -f main && + git clean -f && + + fill 1 2 3 4 5 >one && + git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 && + test_grep "recover your local changes" actual && + git checkout -f main && + git stash pop && + fill 1 2 3 4 5 >expect && + test_cmp expect one +' + +test_expect_success 'checkout -m autostash message includes target branch' ' + git checkout -f main && + git clean -f && + + fill 1 2 3 4 5 >one && + git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 && + git stash list >stash-list && + test_grep "autostash while switching to .side." stash-list && + git stash drop && + git checkout -f main && + git reset --hard +' + +test_expect_success 'checkout -m stashes on staged conflicting changes' ' + git checkout -f main && + git clean -f && + + fill 1 2 3 4 5 >one && + git add one && + git checkout -m side >actual 2>&1 && + test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual && + test_grep "resulted in conflicts" actual && + test_grep "git stash drop" actual && + git stash drop && + git reset --hard +' + +test_expect_success 'checkout -m applies stash cleanly with non-overlapping changes in same file' ' + git checkout -f main && + git reset --hard && + git clean -f && + + git checkout -b nonoverlap_base && + fill a b c d >file && + git add file && + git commit -m "add file" && + + git checkout -b nonoverlap_child && + fill a b c INSERTED d >file && + git commit -a -m "insert line near end of file" && + + fill DIRTY a b c INSERTED d >file && + + git stash list >stash-before && + git checkout -m nonoverlap_base 2>stderr && + test_grep "Applied autostash" stderr && + test_grep ! "resulted in conflicts" stderr && + + git stash list >stash-after && + test_cmp stash-before stash-after && + + fill DIRTY a b c d >expect && + test_cmp expect file && + + git checkout -f main && + git branch -D nonoverlap_base && + git branch -D nonoverlap_child +' + +test_expect_success 'checkout -m -b skips stash with dirty tree' ' + git checkout -f main && + git clean -f && + + fill 0 x y z >same && + git checkout -m -b newbranch >actual 2>&1 && + test_grep ! "Created autostash" actual && + fill 0 x y z >expect && + test_cmp expect same && + git checkout main && + git branch -D newbranch +' + test_expect_success 'switch to another branch while carrying a deletion' ' git checkout -f main && git reset --hard &&t/t7600-merge.sh +1
-1@@ -914,7 +914,7 @@ test_expect_success 'merge with conflicted --autostash changes' ' git diff >expect && test_when_finished "test_might_fail git stash drop" && git merge --autostash c3 2>err && - test_grep "Applying autostash resulted in conflicts." err && + test_grep "your local changes resulted in conflicts" err && git show HEAD:file >merge-result && test_cmp result.1-9 merge-result && git stash show -p >actual &&xdiff-interface.c +12
-0@@ -325,6 +325,18 @@ int parse_conflict_style_name(const char *value)return -1 ; } +const char *conflict_style_name (int style) +{ +switch (style) { +case XDL_MERGE_DIFF3 : +return "diff3" ; +case XDL_MERGE_ZEALOUS_DIFF3 : +return "zdiff3" ; +default : +return "merge" ; + } +} +int git_xmerge_style =-1 ; int git_xmerge_config(const char *var, const char *value,xdiff-interface.h +1
-0@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ void xdiff_set_find_func(xdemitconf_t *xecfg, const char *line, int cflags);void xdiff_clear_find_func (xdemitconf_t *xecfg);struct config_context ;int parse_conflict_style_name (const char *value); +const char *conflict_style_name (int style);int git_xmerge_config (const char *var,const char *value,const struct config_context *ctx,void *cb);extern int git_xmerge_style;
Re: [PATCH v12 4/4] checkout: -m (--merge) uses autostash when switching branches
Quoted 7 lines · Phillip Wood
Hi Harald
For the subject line I think
checkout -m: autostash when switching branches
would be more in keeping with our usual style.
Thanks. I agree. Alternatively,
checkout: autostash when switching branches with -m
would also work.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
When switching branches with "git checkout -m", local modifications can block the switch.
Really? Isn't the point of "checkout -m" to merge the local modifications into the branch that's being checked out?
Yeah, either "git checkout -m" -> "git checkout" (without "-m") or "can block" -> "can cause conflict during". Also, I think a bit more description of what happens in the current system without this patch series would clarify the motivation. Perhaps something like...
When switching branches with "git checkout -m", the attempted merge of local modifications may cause conflicts with the changes made on the other branch, which the user may not want to (or may not be able to) resolve right now. Because there is no easy way to recover from this situation, we discouraged users from using "checkout -m" unless they are certain their changes are trivial and within their ability to resolve conflicts.
... would contrast well with "the user can resolve or reset and postpone 'stash pop' to some later time" we will give at the end of the message.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Teach the -m flow to create a temporary stash
before switching and reapply it after. On success, only "Applied autostash." is shown.and a diff of the local changes?
I noticed that we show the same output as a successful "git checkout other-branch" without "-m" shows, i.e., short list of modified paths. I am not sure what it is officially called but calling it "diff" is probably misleading.
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
If reapplying causes conflicts, the stash is
kept and the user is told they can resolve and run "git stash drop", or run "git reset --hard" and later "git stash pop" to recover their changes.
Good.
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/checkout.c static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *opts, · line 825
Quoted 7 lines
builtin/checkout.c +1
-0@@ -814,6 +820,7 @@ static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *opts,refresh_index (the_repository->index,REFRESH_QUIET ,NULL ,NULL ,NULL );if (unmerged_index (the_repository->index)) { +rollback_lock_file (&lock_file);error (_ ("you need to resolve your current index first" ));return 1 ;The changes up to here look like fixes for an existing bug and so would be better in a separate patch.
Good point.
Quoted 2 lines
Sometimes we return "1" and sometimes "-1" what does that signal to the caller?
This too.
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
builtin/checkout.c +0
-0@@ -846,82 +853,8 @@ static int merge_working_tree(const struct checkout_opts *opts, ret =unpack_trees (2 , trees, &topts);clear_unpack_trees_porcelain (&topts);if (ret ==-1 ) {[lots of deletions]
builtin/checkout.c +2
-2-if (ret) -return ret; +rollback_lock_file (&lock_file); +return 1 ; } }
Quoted 7 lines
builtin/checkout.c static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts, · line 1102
Quoted 5 lines
builtin/checkout.c +1
-0@@ -1166,6 +1099,10 @@ static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts,struct object_id rev;int flag, writeout_error =0 ;int do_merge =1 ; +int created_autostash =0 ;This can be a bool
So are many things (like do_merge, writeout_error). I wouldn't worry too much about the difference between int and bool unless it is a function parameter.
Quoted 11 lines
builtin/checkout.c static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts, · line 1159
Quoted 5 lines
builtin/checkout.c +5
-0+strbuf_addf (&autostash_msg, +"autostash while switching to '%s'" , + new_branch_info->name); + create_autostash_ref_with_msg_silent(the_repository, + "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH_HEAD",It's a shame we have to create a ref here.
MERGE_AUTOSTASHexists so that "git merge --continue" can apply the stash once the user has resolved any merge conflicts. We don't have that problem here because there is no user interaction and we could just hold onto the stash oid in a variable.
Hmph, so it is not a shame and we can do without it?
Quoted 2 lines
The changes up to here look like fixes for an existing bug and so would be better in a separate patch.
👍
Quoted 2 lines
Sometimes we return "1" and sometimes "-1" what does that signal to the caller?
I just tried to follow a pattern, I'm not knowlegable of how this return code will be used. Futher down in the file we check 'ret == -1' and turn it into 1, so maybe 1 is correct?
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
+ autostash_msg.len ? autostash_msg.buf : NULL);
Can we create an autostash without setting a message in
autostash_msg?
No, seems not. I'll simplify it!
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
+ if (
created_autostash&& !opts->discard_changes && !opts->quiet &&Wouldn't it be a bug if we've created and autostash when
opts->discard_changesis set? Why do we need to check it?
I'll simplify it!
Quoted 6 lines
builtin/checkout.c static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts, · line 1202
Quoted 3 lines
builtin/checkout.c +3
-0+ new_branch_info->commit) +show_local_changes (&new_branch_info->commit->object, + &opts->diff_options);So this is a change to the output when using "checkout -m"? If so it might be better as a separate change.
Do you mean to drop if from my patchset, or just make it a separate commit within this series?
Harald
Quoted 11 lines · Harald Nordgren
Quoted 2 lines
The changes up to here look like fixes for an existing bug and so would be better in a separate patch.
👍
Quoted 2 lines
Sometimes we return "1" and sometimes "-1" what does that signal to the caller?
I just tried to follow a pattern, I'm not knowlegable of how this return code will be used. Futher down in the file we check 'ret == -1' and turn it into 1, so maybe 1 is correct?
But you can read the code to see how it is used. Tracing the return path of merge_working_tree(), the return value get propagated back up to the top of the call stack i.e. cmd_checkout() or cmd_switch() and used as the return value there. I had wondered if we were using the value on the way back up the stack and doing something different based on the whether it was "1" or "-1" but we don't so it only affects the exit code of "git checkout". That means returning "1" is sensible I think.
Quoted 2 lines
Do you mean to drop if from my patchset, or just make it a separate commit within this series?
A separate commit in this series. As "git checkout" without "-m" can also carry local changes across we probably should do the same there as well.
Thanks
Phillip
Quoted 11 lines
builtin/checkout.c static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts, · line 1159
Quoted 5 lines
builtin/checkout.c +5
-0+strbuf_addf (&autostash_msg, +"autostash while switching to '%s'" , + new_branch_info->name); + create_autostash_ref_with_msg_silent(the_repository, + "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH_HEAD",It's a shame we have to create a ref here.
MERGE_AUTOSTASHexists so that "git merge --continue" can apply the stash once the user has resolved any merge conflicts. We don't have that problem here because there is no user interaction and we could just hold onto the stash oid in a variable.
I don't know how to actually do that. Maybe better to do later?
Quoted 10 lines
builtin/checkout.c static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts, · line 1164
Quoted 5 lines
builtin/checkout.c +4
-0+ autostash_msg.buf); + created_autostash =1 ; + ret =merge_working_tree (opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info, &writeout_error); + }if (ret) {I'm confused by this - if we stash then don't we expect the call to
unpack_trees()inmerge_working_tree()to succeed and therefore return 0? Ifopts->mergeis false then we should not be trying to apply the stash whenmerge_working_tree()fails.
Same here, I'm not sure how to get this to work. Maybe better to do later?
Harald
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 5 lines
builtin/checkout.c +5
-0+strbuf_addf (&autostash_msg, +"autostash while switching to '%s'" , + new_branch_info->name); + create_autostash_ref_with_msg_silent(the_repository, + "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH_HEAD",
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
It's a shame we have to create a ref here.
MERGE_AUTOSTASHexists so that "git merge --continue" can apply the stash once the user has resolved any merge conflicts. We don't have that problem here because there is no user interaction and we could just hold onto the stash oid in a variable.I don't know how to actually do that. Maybe better to do later?
A gave this a try, but it becomes a very big change. Or maybe I'm missing some key knowledge here.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 5 lines
builtin/checkout.c +4
-0+ autostash_msg.buf); + created_autostash =1 ; + ret =merge_working_tree (opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info, &writeout_error); + }if (ret) {
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
I'm confused by this - if we stash then don't we expect the call to
unpack_trees()inmerge_working_tree()to succeed and therefore return 0? Ifopts->mergeis false then we should not be trying to apply the stash whenmerge_working_tree()fails.Same here, I'm not sure how to get this to work. Maybe better to do later?
I think I succeeded with this one.
Harald
Quoted 12 lines · Harald Nordgren
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 11 lines
builtin/checkout.c static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts, · line 1159
Quoted 5 lines
builtin/checkout.c +5
-0+strbuf_addf (&autostash_msg, +"autostash while switching to '%s'" , + new_branch_info->name); + create_autostash_ref_with_msg_silent(the_repository, + "CHECKOUT_AUTOSTASH_HEAD",It's a shame we have to create a ref here.
MERGE_AUTOSTASHexists so that "git merge --continue" can apply the stash once the user has resolved any merge conflicts. We don't have that problem here because there is no user interaction and we could just hold onto the stash oid in a variable.
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
I don't know how to actually do that. Maybe better to do later?
A gave this a try, but it becomes a very big change. Or maybe I'm missing some key knowledge here.
Maybe leave that for now then
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines
builtin/checkout.c static int switch_branches(const struct checkout_opts *opts, · line 1164
Quoted 5 lines
builtin/checkout.c +4
-0+ autostash_msg.buf); + created_autostash =1 ; + ret =merge_working_tree (opts, &old_branch_info, new_branch_info, &writeout_error); + }if (ret) {I'm confused by this - if we stash then don't we expect the call to
unpack_trees()inmerge_working_tree()to succeed and therefore return 0?
In that case we apply the stash lower down so that's fine.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
If
opts->mergeis false then we should not be trying to apply the stash whenmerge_working_tree()fails.Same here, I'm not sure how to get this to work. Maybe better to do later?
I think I succeeded with this one.
This one definitely needs fixing but it should be simple to do as I think it is just a logic error. We should not be trying to re-apply the stash unless we created it and we can check "created_autostash" to do that.
Thanks
Phillip
Quoted 3 lines
Harald