t5301: use test_path_is_file instead of test -f
PATCH 1/1 t5301: use test_path_is_file instead of test -f
From: Roger Koranteng <[email protected]>
Replace raw 'test -f' assertions with the 'test_path_is_file' helper, which gives diagnostic output when the assertion fails.
---
t5301: use test_path_is_file instead of test -f
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-2269%2Frogerkorantenng%2Ft5301-modernize-path-checks-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-2269/rogerkorantenng/t5301-modernize-path-checks-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/2269
t/t5301-sliding-window.sh | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
t/t5301-sliding-window.sh +2 -2
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup' ' git repack -a -d && test "$(git count-objects)" = "0 objects, 0 kilobytes" && pack1=$(ls .git/objects/pack/*.pack) && - test -f "$pack1" + test_path_is_file "$pack1" ' test_expect_success 'verify-pack -v, defaults' '
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ test_expect_success 'repack -a -d, packedGit{WindowSize,Limit} == 1 page' ' git repack -a -d && test "$(git count-objects)" = "0 objects, 0 kilobytes" && pack2=$(ls .git/objects/pack/*.pack) && - test -f "$pack2" && + test_path_is_file "$pack2" && test "$pack1" \!= "$pack2" '
base-commit: c51408889c3b372814bc20b9431c3b74d0d268eb
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
Quoted 21 lines · Roger Koranteng via GitGitGadget
From: Roger Koranteng <[email protected]>
Replace raw 'test -f' assertions with the '
test_path_is_file' helper, which gives diagnostic output when the assertion fails.Signed-off-by Roger Koranteng <[email protected]>---
t5301: usetest_path_is_fileinstead of test -fPublished-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-2269%2Frogerkorantenng%2Ft5301-modernize-path-checks-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-2269/rogerkorantenng/t5301-modernize-path-checks-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/2269t/t5301-sliding-window.sh | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)t/t5301-sliding-window.sh +0
-0
t/t5301-sliding-window.sh test_expect_success 'setup' ' · line 26
Quoted 6 lines
t/t5301-sliding-window.sh +1
-1@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ test_expect_success 'setup' ' git repack -a -d && test "$(git count-objects)" = "0 objects, 0 kilobytes" && pack1=$(ls .git/objects/pack/*.pack) && - test -f "$pack1" + test_path_is_file "$pack1" '
OK.
t/t5301-sliding-window.sh test_expect_success 'repack -a -d, packedGit{WindowSize,Limit} == 1 page' ' · line 51
Quoted 7 lines
t/t5301-sliding-window.sh +1
-1test_expect_success 'verify-pack -v, defaults' '@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ test_expect_success 'repack -a -d, packedGit{WindowSize,Limit} == 1 page' ' git repack -a -d && test "$(git count-objects)" = "0 objects, 0 kilobytes" && pack2=$(ls .git/objects/pack/*.pack) && - test -f "$pack2" && + test_path_is_file "$pack2" &&
OK.
t/t5301-sliding-window.sh test_expect_success 'repack -a -d, packedGit{WindowSize,Limit} == 1 page' ' · line 53
Quoted 2 lines
t/t5301-sliding-window.sh +0
-0test "$pack1" \!= "$pack2" '
This is an existing wart but we shouldn't quote letters that we do not have to quote like this. It gives a wrong hint to readers that something fishy might be going on and distracts them. We may want to have a separate job to find warts in tests similar to this one and eradicate them all, but that is totally outside the scope of this patch.
Looking good to me.