Skip to contentSkip to conversation

t7519-status-fsmonitor: improve comments

PATCH In review William Baker via GitGitGadget 3 participants 4 messages Oct 16, 2019 – Oct 30, 2019

lore
Share & tools
lore
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 t7519-status-fsmonitor: improve comments

In reply to William Baker via GitGitGadget

From: William Baker <[email protected]>

The comments for the staging/unstaging test did not accurately describe the scenario being tested. It is not essential that the test files being staged/unstaged appear at the end of the index. All that is required is that the test files are not flagged with CE_FSMONITOR_VALID and have a position in the index greater than the number of entries in the index after unstaging.

The comment for this test has been updated to be more accurate with respect to the scenario that's being tested.

---
 t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh +5 -3
index d8df990972..997d5fb349 100755
@@ -354,9 +354,11 @@ test_expect_success 'discard_index() also discards fsmonitor info' '
 	test_cmp expect actual
 '
 
-# Test staging/unstaging files that appear at the end of the index.  Test
-# file names begin with 'z' so that they are sorted to the end of the index.
-test_expect_success 'status succeeds after staging/unstaging ' '
+# Test unstaging entries that:
+#  - Are not flagged with CE_FSMONITOR_VALID
+#  - Have a position in the index >= the number of entries present in the index
+#    after unstaging.
+test_expect_success 'status succeeds after staging/unstaging' '
 	test_create_repo fsmonitor-stage-unstage &&
 	(
 		cd fsmonitor-stage-unstage &&
Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
#0 lore raw

cover t7519-status-fsmonitor: improve comments

This patch series is based on the 'wb/fsmonitor-bitmap-fix' branch and addresses feedback on the new test that was added there.

I've updated the comments for the new test to more accurately describe the scenario being tested.

Thanks,

William

William Baker (1):
t7519-status-fsmonitor: improve comments

 t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

base-commit: 3444ec2eb2be58c285d2bf04f39e6e9ea5eda9a2
Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tag/pr-404%2Fwilbaker%2Ffsmonitor_test_cleanup-v1
Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-404/wilbaker/fsmonitor_test_cleanup-v1
Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/404

Signature · 1 line
gitgitgadget
#2 lore raw
In reply to William Baker via GitGitGadget
Quoted 28 lines · William Baker via GitGitGadget

From: William Baker <[email protected]>

The comments for the staging/unstaging test did not accurately describe the scenario being tested. It is not essential that the test files being staged/unstaged appear at the end of the index. All that is required is that the test files are not flagged with CE_FSMONITOR_VALID and have a position in the index greater than the number of entries in the index after unstaging.

The comment for this test has been updated to be more accurate with respect to the scenario that's being tested.

---
 t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh +0 -1
index d8df990972..997d5fb349 100755
@@ -354,9 +354,11 @@ test_expect_success 'discard_index() also discards fsmonitor info' '
 	test_cmp expect actual
 '
 
-# Test staging/unstaging files that appear at the end of the index.  Test

t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh test_expect_success 'discard_index() also discards fsmonitor info' ' · line 364

Quoted 10 lines
t/t7519-status-fsmonitor.sh +5 -2
-# file names begin with 'z' so that they are sorted to the end of the index.
-test_expect_success 'status succeeds after staging/unstaging ' '
+# Test unstaging entries that:
+#  - Are not flagged with CE_FSMONITOR_VALID
+#  - Have a position in the index >= the number of entries present in the index
+#    after unstaging.
+test_expect_success 'status succeeds after staging/unstaging' '
 	test_create_repo fsmonitor-stage-unstage &&
 	(
 		cd fsmonitor-stage-unstage &&

Gentle ping on this patch. It's just a small update to the comments for an fsmonitor related test based on feedback I received in the segfault fix patch series [1].

Thanks,
William

[1] https://public-inbox.org/git/[email protected]/

#3 lore raw
Quoted 3 lines · William Baker

Gentle ping on this patch. It's just a small update to the comments for an fsmonitor related test based on feedback I received in the segfault fix patch series [1].

Thanks for a reminder. Queued.