ebpf: BPF_ALU32 | BPF_ARSH on BE arches
Hi!
Looks like the code:
ALU_ARSH_X:
DST = (u64) (u32) ((*(s32 *) &DST) >> SRC);
CONT;
ALU_ARSH_K:
DST = (u64) (u32) ((*(s32 *) &DST) >> IMM);
CONT;works incorrectly on BE arches since it must operate on lower parts of 64bit registers.
See failure of test_verifier test 'arsh32 on imm 2' (#23 on 5.2-rc6).
Signature · 2 lines
WBR, Yauheni Kaliuta
Quoted 11 lines · Yauheni Kaliuta
Hi!
Looks like the code:
ALU_ARSH_X: DST = (u64) (u32) ((*(s32 *) &DST) >> SRC); CONT; ALU_ARSH_K: DST = (u64) (u32) ((*(s32 *) &DST) >> IMM); CONT;
Quoted 5 lines
works incorrectly on BE arches since it must operate on lower parts of 64bit registers.
See failure of
test_verifiertest 'arsh32 on imm 2' (#23 on 5.2-rc6).
Ah, thanks for reporting this.
Should not taken the address directly, does the following fix resolved the failure?
ALU_ARSH_X:
DST = (u64) (u32) ((s32) DST) >> SRC);
CONT;
ALU_ARSH_K:
DST = (u64) (u32) ((s32) DST) >> IMM);
CONT;Regards,
Jiong
Hi, Jiong!
Quoted 26 lines
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line · Jiong Wang
Quoted 11 lines · Yauheni Kaliuta
Hi!
Looks like the code:
ALU_ARSH_X:
DST = (u64) (u32) ((*(s32 *) &DST) >> SRC);
CONT;ALU_ARSH_K:
DST = (u64) (u32) ((*(s32 *) &DST) >> IMM);
CONT;Quoted 5 lines
works incorrectly on BE arches since it must operate on lower parts of 64bit registers.
See failure of
test_verifiertest 'arsh32 on imm 2' (#23 on 5.2-rc6).Ah, thanks for reporting this.
Should not taken the address directly, does the following fix resolved the failure?
Quoted 6 lines
ALU_ARSH_X:
DST = (u64) (u32) ((s32) DST) >> SRC);
CONT;
ALU_ARSH_K:
DST = (u64) (u32) ((s32) DST) >> IMM);
CONT;Yes, thanks (just add the missing braces).
Signature · 2 lines
WBR, Yauheni Kaliuta