Skip to contentSkip to conversation

arm64: Use pr_* instead of printk

PATCH In review Jungseok Lee 1 participant 1 message May 12, 2014

Subsystems (2)
Arm Samsung Exynos arm64
lore
Share & tools
lore

Jungseok Lee

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH v6 1/7 arm64: Use pr_* instead of printk

This patch fixed the following checkpatch complaint as using pr_* instead of printk.

WARNING: printk() should include KERN_ facility level

Cc Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by Jungseok Lee <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by Sungjinn Chung <[email protected]>
Acked-by Kukjin Kim <[email protected]>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c +4 -4
index c43cfa9..506f781 100644
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static void dump_backtrace(struct pt_regs *regs, struct task_struct *tsk)
 		frame.pc = thread_saved_pc(tsk);
 	}
 
-	printk("Call trace:\n");
+	pr_emerg("Call trace:\n");
 	while (1) {
 		unsigned long where = frame.pc;
 		int ret;

@@ -331,17 +331,17 @@ asmlinkage void bad_mode(struct pt_regs *regs, int reason, unsigned int esr)
 
 void __pte_error(const char *file, int line, unsigned long val)
 {
-	printk("%s:%d: bad pte %016lx.\n", file, line, val);
+	pr_crit("%s:%d: bad pte %016lx.\n", file, line, val);
 }
 
 void __pmd_error(const char *file, int line, unsigned long val)
 {
-	printk("%s:%d: bad pmd %016lx.\n", file, line, val);
+	pr_crit("%s:%d: bad pmd %016lx.\n", file, line, val);
 }
 
 void __pgd_error(const char *file, int line, unsigned long val)
 {
-	printk("%s:%d: bad pgd %016lx.\n", file, line, val);
+	pr_crit("%s:%d: bad pgd %016lx.\n", file, line, val);
 }
 
 void __init trap_init(void)
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4