e1000: multi-buffer packet support
PATCH 1/1 e1000: multi-buffer packet support
e1000 supports multi-buffer packets larger than rxbuf_size.
This fixes the following (on linux):
- in guest: ifconfig eth1 mtu 16110
- in host: ifconfig tap0 mtu 16110
ping -s 16082 <guest-ip>
Red Hat bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602205
--- hw/e1000.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
hw/e1000.c +20 -5
@@ -642,6 +642,8 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size)uint16_t vlan_special =0 ;uint8_t vlan_status =0 , vlan_offset =0 ;uint8_t min_buf[MIN_BUF_SIZE ]; +size_t desc_offset; +size_t desc_size;if (!(s->mac_reg[RCTL ] &E1000_RCTL_EN ))return -1 ;
@@ -654,7 +656,7 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) size =sizeof (min_buf); } -if (size > s->rxbuf_size) { +if (0 && size > s->rxbuf_size) {DBGOUT (RX ,"packet too large for buffers (%lu > %d)\n" , (unsigned long )size, s->rxbuf_size);return -1 ;
@@ -672,8 +674,15 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) } rdh_start = s->mac_reg[RDH ]; + desc_offset =0 ; do { + desc_size = size - desc_offset; + if (desc_size > s->rxbuf_size) { + desc_size = s->rxbuf_size; + } if (s->mac_reg[RDH] == s->mac_reg[RDT] && s->check_rxov) { + /* Discard all data written so far */ + s->mac_reg[RDH] = rdh_start; set_ics(s, 0, E1000_ICS_RXO); return -1; }
@@ -684,9 +693,15 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) desc.status |= (vlan_status |E1000_RXD_STAT_DD );if (desc.buffer_addr) {cpu_physical_memory_write (le64_to_cpu (desc.buffer_addr), - (void *)(buf + vlan_offset), size); - desc.length =cpu_to_le16 (size +fcs_len (s)); - desc.status |=E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP |E1000_RXD_STAT_IXSM ; + (void *)(buf + desc_offset + vlan_offset), + desc_size); + desc_offset += desc_size; +if (desc_offset >= size) { + desc.length =cpu_to_le16 (desc_size +fcs_len (s)); + desc.status |=E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP |E1000_RXD_STAT_IXSM ; + }else { + desc.length =cpu_to_le16 (desc_size); + } }else {// as per intel docs; skip descriptors with null buf addr DBGOUT (RX ,"Null RX descriptor!!\n" ); }
@@ -702,7 +717,7 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size)set_ics (s,0 ,E1000_ICS_RXO );return -1 ; } - }while (desc.buffer_addr ==0 ); + }while (desc_offset < size); s->mac_reg[GPRC ]++; s->mac_reg[TPR ]++;
Signature · 1 line
1.7.3.2.91.g446ac
Quoted 28 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin
e1000 supports multi-buffer packets larger than
rxbuf_size.This fixes the following (on linux):
- in guest: ifconfig eth1 mtu 16110
- in host: ifconfig tap0 mtu 16110ping -s 16082 <guest-ip>Red Hat bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602205
Signed-off-by Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>--- hw/e1000.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)hw/e1000.c +2
-0@@ -642,6 +642,8 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size)uint16_t vlan_special =0 ;uint8_t vlan_status =0 , vlan_offset =0 ;uint8_t min_buf[MIN_BUF_SIZE ]; +size_t desc_offset; +size_t desc_size;if (!(s->mac_reg[RCTL ] &E1000_RCTL_EN ))return -1 ;
hw/e1000.c e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) · line 662
Quoted 8 lines
hw/e1000.c +1
-1@@ -654,7 +656,7 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) size =sizeof (min_buf); } -if (size > s->rxbuf_size) { +if (0 && size > s->rxbuf_size) {DBGOUT (RX ,"packet too large for buffers (%lu > %d)\n" , (unsigned long )size, s->rxbuf_size);return -1 ;
Why are we saving this code if it's unreachable?
Quoted 44 lines
hw/e1000.c +17
-4@@ -672,8 +674,15 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) } rdh_start = s->mac_reg[RDH ]; + desc_offset =0 ; do { + desc_size = size - desc_offset; + if (desc_size > s->rxbuf_size) { + desc_size = s->rxbuf_size; + } if (s->mac_reg[RDH] == s->mac_reg[RDT] && s->check_rxov) { + /* Discard all data written so far */ + s->mac_reg[RDH] = rdh_start; set_ics(s, 0, E1000_ICS_RXO); return -1; }@@ -684,9 +693,15 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) desc.status |= (vlan_status |E1000_RXD_STAT_DD );if (desc.buffer_addr) {cpu_physical_memory_write (le64_to_cpu (desc.buffer_addr), - (void *)(buf + vlan_offset), size); - desc.length =cpu_to_le16 (size +fcs_len (s)); - desc.status |=E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP |E1000_RXD_STAT_IXSM ; + (void *)(buf + desc_offset + vlan_offset), + desc_size); + desc_offset += desc_size; +if (desc_offset >= size) { + desc.length =cpu_to_le16 (desc_size +fcs_len (s)); + desc.status |=E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP |E1000_RXD_STAT_IXSM ; + }else { + desc.length =cpu_to_le16 (desc_size); + } }else {// as per intel docs; skip descriptors with null buf addr DBGOUT (RX ,"Null RX descriptor!!\n" ); }@@ -702,7 +717,7 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size)set_ics (s,0 ,E1000_ICS_RXO );return -1 ; } - }while (desc.buffer_addr ==0 ); + }while (desc_offset < size); s->mac_reg[GPRC ]++; s->mac_reg[TPR ]++;
Quoted 32 lines · Alex Williamson
Quoted 31 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin
e1000 supports multi-buffer packets larger than
rxbuf_size.This fixes the following (on linux):
- in guest: ifconfig eth1 mtu 16110
- in host: ifconfig tap0 mtu 16110ping -s 16082 <guest-ip>Red Hat bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602205
Signed-off-by Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>--- hw/e1000.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)hw/e1000.c +2
-0@@ -642,6 +642,8 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size)uint16_t vlan_special =0 ;uint8_t vlan_status =0 , vlan_offset =0 ;uint8_t min_buf[MIN_BUF_SIZE ]; +size_t desc_offset; +size_t desc_size;if (!(s->mac_reg[RCTL ] &E1000_RCTL_EN ))return -1 ;@@ -654,7 +656,7 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) size =sizeof (min_buf); }
Quoted 7 lines
hw/e1000.c e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) · line 662
Quoted 5 lines
hw/e1000.c +1
-1-if (size > s->rxbuf_size) { +if (0 && size > s->rxbuf_size) {DBGOUT (RX ,"packet too large for buffers (%lu > %d)\n" , (unsigned long )size, s->rxbuf_size);return -1 ;Why are we saving this code if it's unreachable?
Just a leftover.
Quoted 46 lines
Quoted 44 lines
hw/e1000.c +17
-4@@ -672,8 +674,15 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) } rdh_start = s->mac_reg[RDH ]; + desc_offset =0 ; do { + desc_size = size - desc_offset; + if (desc_size > s->rxbuf_size) { + desc_size = s->rxbuf_size; + } if (s->mac_reg[RDH] == s->mac_reg[RDT] && s->check_rxov) { + /* Discard all data written so far */ + s->mac_reg[RDH] = rdh_start; set_ics(s, 0, E1000_ICS_RXO); return -1; }@@ -684,9 +693,15 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) desc.status |= (vlan_status |E1000_RXD_STAT_DD );if (desc.buffer_addr) {cpu_physical_memory_write (le64_to_cpu (desc.buffer_addr), - (void *)(buf + vlan_offset), size); - desc.length =cpu_to_le16 (size +fcs_len (s)); - desc.status |=E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP |E1000_RXD_STAT_IXSM ; + (void *)(buf + desc_offset + vlan_offset), + desc_size); + desc_offset += desc_size; +if (desc_offset >= size) { + desc.length =cpu_to_le16 (desc_size +fcs_len (s)); + desc.status |=E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP |E1000_RXD_STAT_IXSM ; + }else { + desc.length =cpu_to_le16 (desc_size); + } }else {// as per intel docs; skip descriptors with null buf addr DBGOUT (RX ,"Null RX descriptor!!\n" ); }@@ -702,7 +717,7 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size)set_ics (s,0 ,E1000_ICS_RXO );return -1 ; } - }while (desc.buffer_addr ==0 ); + }while (desc_offset < size); s->mac_reg[GPRC ]++; s->mac_reg[TPR ]++;
hw/e1000.c e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) · line 662
Quoted 9 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin
hw/e1000.c +1
-1@@ -654,7 +656,7 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) size =sizeof (min_buf); } -if (size > s->rxbuf_size) { +if (0 && size > s->rxbuf_size) {DBGOUT (RX ,"packet too large for buffers (%lu > %d)\n" , (unsigned long )size, s->rxbuf_size);return -1 ;
Please remove completely or enhance this conditional to work in a multi-buffer world.
Stefan