e1000: multi-buffer packet support
PATCH v2 1/1 e1000: multi-buffer packet support
e1000 supports multi-buffer packets larger than rxbuf_size.
This fixes the following (on linux):
- in guest: ifconfig eth1 mtu 16110
- in host: ifconfig tap0 mtu 16110
ping -s 16082 <guest-ip>
Red Hat bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602205
---
Changes from v1:
removed dead code
hw/e1000.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
hw/e1000.c +19 -10
@@ -642,6 +642,8 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size)uint16_t vlan_special =0 ;uint8_t vlan_status =0 , vlan_offset =0 ;uint8_t min_buf[MIN_BUF_SIZE ]; +size_t desc_offset; +size_t desc_size;if (!(s->mac_reg[RCTL ] &E1000_RCTL_EN ))return -1 ;
@@ -654,12 +656,6 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) size =sizeof (min_buf); } -if (size > s->rxbuf_size) { -DBGOUT (RX ,"packet too large for buffers (%lu > %d)\n" , - (unsigned long )size, s->rxbuf_size); -return -1 ; - } -if (!receive_filter (s, buf, size))return size;
@@ -672,8 +668,15 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) } rdh_start = s->mac_reg[RDH ]; + desc_offset =0 ; do { + desc_size = size - desc_offset; + if (desc_size > s->rxbuf_size) { + desc_size = s->rxbuf_size; + } if (s->mac_reg[RDH] == s->mac_reg[RDT] && s->check_rxov) { + /* Discard all data written so far */ + s->mac_reg[RDH] = rdh_start; set_ics(s, 0, E1000_ICS_RXO); return -1; }
@@ -684,9 +687,15 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) desc.status |= (vlan_status |E1000_RXD_STAT_DD );if (desc.buffer_addr) {cpu_physical_memory_write (le64_to_cpu (desc.buffer_addr), - (void *)(buf + vlan_offset), size); - desc.length =cpu_to_le16 (size +fcs_len (s)); - desc.status |=E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP |E1000_RXD_STAT_IXSM ; + (void *)(buf + desc_offset + vlan_offset), + desc_size); + desc_offset += desc_size; +if (desc_offset >= size) { + desc.length =cpu_to_le16 (desc_size +fcs_len (s)); + desc.status |=E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP |E1000_RXD_STAT_IXSM ; + }else { + desc.length =cpu_to_le16 (desc_size); + } }else {// as per intel docs; skip descriptors with null buf addr DBGOUT (RX ,"Null RX descriptor!!\n" ); }
@@ -702,7 +711,7 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size)set_ics (s,0 ,E1000_ICS_RXO );return -1 ; } - }while (desc.buffer_addr ==0 ); + }while (desc_offset < size); s->mac_reg[GPRC ]++; s->mac_reg[TPR ]++;
Signature · 1 line
1.7.3.2.91.g446ac
Quoted 9 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin
e1000 supports multi-buffer packets larger than
rxbuf_size.This fixes the following (on linux):
- in guest: ifconfig eth1 mtu 16110
- in host: ifconfig tap0 mtu 16110ping -s 16082 <guest-ip>Red Hat bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602205
Quoted 8 lines
Signed-off-by Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>---
Changes from v1:
removed dead codehw/e1000.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Quoted 70 lines
hw/e1000.c +19
-10@@ -642,6 +642,8 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size)uint16_t vlan_special =0 ;uint8_t vlan_status =0 , vlan_offset =0 ;uint8_t min_buf[MIN_BUF_SIZE ]; +size_t desc_offset; +size_t desc_size;if (!(s->mac_reg[RCTL ] &E1000_RCTL_EN ))return -1 ;@@ -654,12 +656,6 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) size =sizeof (min_buf); } -if (size > s->rxbuf_size) { -DBGOUT (RX ,"packet too large for buffers (%lu > %d)\n" , - (unsigned long )size, s->rxbuf_size); -return -1 ; - } -if (!receive_filter (s, buf, size))return size;@@ -672,8 +668,15 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) } rdh_start = s->mac_reg[RDH ]; + desc_offset =0 ; do { + desc_size = size - desc_offset; + if (desc_size > s->rxbuf_size) { + desc_size = s->rxbuf_size; + } if (s->mac_reg[RDH] == s->mac_reg[RDT] && s->check_rxov) { + /* Discard all data written so far */ + s->mac_reg[RDH] = rdh_start; set_ics(s, 0, E1000_ICS_RXO); return -1; }@@ -684,9 +687,15 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) desc.status |= (vlan_status |E1000_RXD_STAT_DD );if (desc.buffer_addr) {cpu_physical_memory_write (le64_to_cpu (desc.buffer_addr), - (void *)(buf + vlan_offset), size); - desc.length =cpu_to_le16 (size +fcs_len (s)); - desc.status |=E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP |E1000_RXD_STAT_IXSM ; + (void *)(buf + desc_offset + vlan_offset), + desc_size); + desc_offset += desc_size; +if (desc_offset >= size) { + desc.length =cpu_to_le16 (desc_size +fcs_len (s)); + desc.status |=E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP |E1000_RXD_STAT_IXSM ; + }else { + desc.length =cpu_to_le16 (desc_size); + } }else {// as per intel docs; skip descriptors with null buf addr DBGOUT (RX ,"Null RX descriptor!!\n" ); }@@ -702,7 +711,7 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size)set_ics (s,0 ,E1000_ICS_RXO );return -1 ; } - }while (desc.buffer_addr ==0 ); + }while (desc_offset < size); s->mac_reg[GPRC ]++; s->mac_reg[TPR ]++;
Quoted 9 lines · Michael S. Tsirkin
e1000 supports multi-buffer packets larger than
rxbuf_size.This fixes the following (on linux):
- in guest: ifconfig eth1 mtu 16110
- in host: ifconfig tap0 mtu 16110
ping -s 16082 <guest-ip>Red Hat bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602205
Quoted 8 lines
Signed-off-by Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>---
Changes from v1:
removed dead codehw/e1000.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Am 03.02.2011 17:49, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
Quoted 62 lines
e1000 supports multi-buffer packets larger than
rxbuf_size.This fixes the following (on linux):
- in guest: ifconfig eth1 mtu 16110
- in host: ifconfig tap0 mtu 16110ping -s 16082 <guest-ip>Red Hat bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602205
Signed-off-by Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>---
Changes from v1:
removed dead codehw/e1000.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)hw/e1000.c +9
-6@@ -642,6 +642,8 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size)uint16_t vlan_special =0 ;uint8_t vlan_status =0 , vlan_offset =0 ;uint8_t min_buf[MIN_BUF_SIZE ]; +size_t desc_offset; +size_t desc_size;if (!(s->mac_reg[RCTL ] &E1000_RCTL_EN ))return -1 ;@@ -654,12 +656,6 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) size =sizeof (min_buf); } -if (size > s->rxbuf_size) { -DBGOUT (RX ,"packet too large for buffers (%lu > %d)\n" , - (unsigned long )size, s->rxbuf_size); -return -1 ; - } -if (!receive_filter (s, buf, size))return size;@@ -672,8 +668,15 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) } rdh_start = s->mac_reg[RDH ]; + desc_offset =0 ; do { + desc_size = size - desc_offset; + if (desc_size > s->rxbuf_size) { + desc_size = s->rxbuf_size; + } if (s->mac_reg[RDH] == s->mac_reg[RDT] && s->check_rxov) { + /* Discard all data written so far */ + s->mac_reg[RDH] = rdh_start; set_ics(s, 0, E1000_ICS_RXO); return -1; }@@ -684,9 +687,15 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) desc.status |= (vlan_status |E1000_RXD_STAT_DD );
hw/e1000.c e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) · line 694
Quoted 10 lines
hw/e1000.c +5
-3if (desc.buffer_addr) {cpu_physical_memory_write (le64_to_cpu (desc.buffer_addr), - (void *)(buf + vlan_offset), size); - desc.length =cpu_to_le16 (size +fcs_len (s)); - desc.status |=E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP |E1000_RXD_STAT_IXSM ; + (void *)(buf + desc_offset + vlan_offset), + desc_size); + desc_offset += desc_size; +if (desc_offset >= size) { + desc.length =cpu_to_le16 (desc_size +fcs_len (s));
I think this is not quite right: What happens if desc_size + fcs_len(s)
Quoted 1 line
s->rxbuf_size? IIUC, we would seemingly overflow the guests buffer (in
reality we leave the extra bytes untouched, but we may confuse the guest).
Kevin
Quoted 75 lines · Kevin Wolf
Am 03.02.2011 17:49, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
Quoted 62 lines
e1000 supports multi-buffer packets larger than
rxbuf_size.This fixes the following (on linux):
- in guest: ifconfig eth1 mtu 16110
- in host: ifconfig tap0 mtu 16110ping -s 16082 <guest-ip>Red Hat bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602205
Signed-off-by Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>---
Changes from v1:
removed dead codehw/e1000.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)hw/e1000.c +9
-6@@ -642,6 +642,8 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size)uint16_t vlan_special =0 ;uint8_t vlan_status =0 , vlan_offset =0 ;uint8_t min_buf[MIN_BUF_SIZE ]; +size_t desc_offset; +size_t desc_size;if (!(s->mac_reg[RCTL ] &E1000_RCTL_EN ))return -1 ;@@ -654,12 +656,6 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) size =sizeof (min_buf); } -if (size > s->rxbuf_size) { -DBGOUT (RX ,"packet too large for buffers (%lu > %d)\n" , - (unsigned long )size, s->rxbuf_size); -return -1 ; - } -if (!receive_filter (s, buf, size))return size;@@ -672,8 +668,15 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) } rdh_start = s->mac_reg[RDH ]; + desc_offset =0 ; do { + desc_size = size - desc_offset; + if (desc_size > s->rxbuf_size) { + desc_size = s->rxbuf_size; + } if (s->mac_reg[RDH] == s->mac_reg[RDT] && s->check_rxov) { + /* Discard all data written so far */ + s->mac_reg[RDH] = rdh_start; set_ics(s, 0, E1000_ICS_RXO); return -1; }@@ -684,9 +687,15 @@ e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) desc.status |= (vlan_status |E1000_RXD_STAT_DD );hw/e1000.c e1000_receive(VLANClientState *nc, const uint8_t *buf, size_t size) · line 694
Quoted 10 lines
hw/e1000.c +5
-3if (desc.buffer_addr) {cpu_physical_memory_write (le64_to_cpu (desc.buffer_addr), - (void *)(buf + vlan_offset), size); - desc.length =cpu_to_le16 (size +fcs_len (s)); - desc.status |=E1000_RXD_STAT_EOP |E1000_RXD_STAT_IXSM ; + (void *)(buf + desc_offset + vlan_offset), + desc_size); + desc_offset += desc_size; +if (desc_offset >= size) { + desc.length =cpu_to_le16 (desc_size +fcs_len (s));I think this is not quite right: What happens if
desc_size+fcs_len(s)
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
s->rxbuf_size? IIUC, we would seemingly overflow the guests buffer (inreality we leave the extra bytes untouched, but we may confuse the guest).
Kevin
Hmm, good point.