Skip to contentSkip to conversation

arm64: Add CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR

PATCH Superseded Laura Abbott 3 participants 5 messages Jan 30, 2014 – Jun 25, 2014 arm64

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/1 arm64: Add CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR

arm64 currently lacks support for -fstack-protector. Add similar functionality to arm to detect stack corruption.

Cc Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>

---
I realized today that the patch I gave before was not going to work for recent trees because of changes to CC_STACKPROTECTOR that were not in my working tree before. This should be the patch to actually work against recent kernels.

---
 arch/arm64/Kconfig                      |    1 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/stackprotector.h |   38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/process.c             |    6 +++++
 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/stackprotector.h
arch/arm64/Kconfig +1 -0
index dd4327f..2ebf522 100644
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ config ARM64
 	select HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND
 	select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
 	select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
+	select HAVE_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
 	select HAVE_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
 	select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK
 	select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG
arch/arm64/include/asm/stackprotector.h new file +38 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..fe5e287
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+/*
+ * GCC stack protector support.
+ *
+ * Stack protector works by putting predefined pattern at the start of
+ * the stack frame and verifying that it hasn't been overwritten when
+ * returning from the function.  The pattern is called stack canary
+ * and gcc expects it to be defined by a global variable called
+ * "__stack_chk_guard" on ARM.  This unfortunately means that on SMP
+ * we cannot have a different canary value per task.
+ */
+
+#ifndef __ASM_STACKPROTECTOR_H
+#define __ASM_STACKPROTECTOR_H
+
+#include <linux/random.h>
+#include <linux/version.h>
+
+extern unsigned long __stack_chk_guard;
+
+/*
+ * Initialize the stackprotector canary value.
+ *
+ * NOTE: this must only be called from functions that never return,
+ * and it must always be inlined.
+ */
+static __always_inline void boot_init_stack_canary(void)
+{
+	unsigned long canary;
+
+	/* Try to get a semi random initial value. */
+	get_random_bytes(&canary, sizeof(canary));
+	canary ^= LINUX_VERSION_CODE;
+
+	current->stack_canary = canary;
+	__stack_chk_guard = current->stack_canary;
+}
+
+#endif	/* _ASM_STACKPROTECTOR_H */
arch/arm64/kernel/process.c +6 -0
index 1e5a178..89c301d 100644
@@ -50,6 +50,12 @@
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 #include <asm/stacktrace.h>
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
+#include <linux/stackprotector.h>
+unsigned long __stack_chk_guard __read_mostly;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__stack_chk_guard);
+#endif
+
 static void setup_restart(void)
 {
 	/*
Signature · 2 lines
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
#2 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/1 arm64: Add CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR

Quoted 11 lines · Kees Cook
Quoted 6 lines · Laura Abbott

arm64 currently lacks support for -fstack-protector. Add similar functionality to arm to detect stack corruption.

Cc Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>

Thanks!

Hi again,

This patch never got applied any where. Who can take this?

Thanks!

-Kees

Signature · 2 lines
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
#3 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/1 arm64: Add CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR

Quoted 9 lines · Kees Cook
Quoted 8 lines · Kees Cook
Quoted 6 lines · Laura Abbott

arm64 currently lacks support for -fstack-protector. Add similar functionality to arm to detect stack corruption.

Cc Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Thanks!

Hi again,

This patch never got applied any where. Who can take this?

We can take this via the arm64 tree. Laura, is the patch still valid against current mainline?

Will

#4 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/1 arm64: Add CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR

Quoted 12 lines · Will Deacon
Quoted 11 lines · Kees Cook
Quoted 10 lines · Kees Cook
Quoted 6 lines · Laura Abbott

arm64 currently lacks support for -fstack-protector. Add similar functionality to arm to detect stack corruption.

Cc Will Deacon <[email protected]>
Cc Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>

Thanks!

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line

Hi again,

This patch never got applied any where. Who can take this?

We can take this via the arm64 tree. Laura, is the patch still valid against current mainline?

Apparently not. I will send out a rebased version.

Thanks,
Laura

Signature · 2 lines
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation