arm64: Add CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
PATCH v3 1/1 arm64: Add CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
arm64 currently lacks support for -fstack-protector. Add similar functionality to arm to detect stack corruption.
---
I realized today that the patch I gave before was not going to work for recent trees because of changes to CC_STACKPROTECTOR that were not in my working tree before. This should be the patch to actually work against recent kernels.
--- arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 + arch/arm64/include/asm/stackprotector.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 6 +++++ 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/stackprotector.h
arch/arm64/Kconfig +1 -0
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ config ARM64 select HARDIRQS_SW_RESEND select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK + select HAVE_CC_STACKPROTECTOR select HAVE_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK select HAVE_DMA_API_DEBUG
arch/arm64/include/asm/stackprotector.h new file +38 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +/* +* GCC stack protector support. +* +* Stack protector works by putting predefined pattern at the start of +* the stack frame and verifying that it hasn't been overwritten when +* returning from the function. The pattern is called stack canary +* and gcc expects it to be defined by a global variable called +* "__stack_chk_guard" on ARM. This unfortunately means that on SMP +* we cannot have a different canary value per task. +*/ + +#ifndef __ASM_STACKPROTECTOR_H +#define __ASM_STACKPROTECTOR_H + +#include <linux/random.h> +#include <linux/version.h> + +extern unsigned long __stack_chk_guard; + +/* +* Initialize the stackprotector canary value. +* +* NOTE: this must only be called from functions that never return, +* and it must always be inlined. +*/ +static __always_inline void boot_init_stack_canary(void) +{ +unsigned long canary; + +/* Try to get a semi random initial value. */ +get_random_bytes (&canary,sizeof (canary)); + canary ^=LINUX_VERSION_CODE ; + + current->stack_canary = canary; + __stack_chk_guard = current->stack_canary; +} + +#endif /* _ASM_STACKPROTECTOR_H */
arch/arm64/kernel/process.c +6 -0
@@ -50,6 +50,12 @@#include <asm/processor.h> #include <asm/stacktrace.h> +#ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR +#include <linux/stackprotector.h> +unsigned long __stack_chk_guard__read_mostly ; +EXPORT_SYMBOL (__stack_chk_guard); +#endif +static void setup_restart (void ) {/*
Signature · 2 lines
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
PATCH v3 1/1 arm64: Add CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
Quoted 6 lines · Laura Abbott
arm64 currently lacks support for -fstack-protector. Add similar functionality to arm to detect stack corruption.
Cc Will Deacon <[email protected]>Cc Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Laura Abbott <[email protected]>
Thanks!
-Kees
Signature · 2 lines
Kees Cook Chrome OS Security
PATCH v3 1/1 arm64: Add CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
Quoted 11 lines · Kees Cook
Quoted 6 lines · Laura Abbott
arm64 currently lacks support for -fstack-protector. Add similar functionality to arm to detect stack corruption.
Cc Will Deacon <[email protected]>Cc Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Laura Abbott <[email protected]>Thanks!
Acked-by Kees Cook <[email protected]>
Hi again,
This patch never got applied any where. Who can take this?
Thanks!
-Kees
Signature · 2 lines
Kees Cook Chrome OS Security
PATCH v3 1/1 arm64: Add CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
Quoted 9 lines · Kees Cook
Quoted 8 lines · Kees Cook
Quoted 6 lines · Laura Abbott
arm64 currently lacks support for -fstack-protector. Add similar functionality to arm to detect stack corruption.
Cc Will Deacon <[email protected]>Cc Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Laura Abbott <[email protected]>
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Thanks!
Acked-by Kees Cook <[email protected]>Hi again,
This patch never got applied any where. Who can take this?
We can take this via the arm64 tree. Laura, is the patch still valid against current mainline?
Will
PATCH v3 1/1 arm64: Add CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
Quoted 12 lines · Will Deacon
Quoted 11 lines · Kees Cook
Quoted 10 lines · Kees Cook
Quoted 6 lines · Laura Abbott
arm64 currently lacks support for -fstack-protector. Add similar functionality to arm to detect stack corruption.
Cc Will Deacon <[email protected]>Cc Catalin Marinas <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Laura Abbott <[email protected]>Thanks!
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
Acked-by Kees Cook <[email protected]>Hi again,
This patch never got applied any where. Who can take this?
We can take this via the arm64 tree. Laura, is the patch still valid against current mainline?
Apparently not. I will send out a rebased version.
Thanks,
Laura
Signature · 2 lines
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation