irqchip: vt8500: Properly mask the interrupt in irq_mask()
PATCH RESEND 1/1 irqchip: vt8500: Properly mask the interrupt in irq_mask()
Current code sets both irq_ack and irq_mask callbacks to vt8500_irq_mask(). However, vt8500_irq_mask does not clear interrupt enable bit when the interrupt trigger mode is edge trigger.
This patch moves the code clearing Interrupt Status Register bit to irq_ack(). Make irq_mask() always clear interrupt enable bit for all interrupt trigger mode.
According to the datasheet, the Interrupt Status Register is written one to clear(Write 0 has no effect). So we don't need a read-modify-write operation for clearing a bit in interrupt status register.
---
Resend and also CC: [email protected]. I appreciate if someone can test this patch.
Thanks,
Axel
drivers/irqchip/irq-vt8500.c | 31 +++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
drivers/irqchip/irq-vt8500.c +15 -16
@@ -81,25 +81,24 @@ struct vt8500_irq_data {static struct vt8500_irq_data intc[VT8500_INTC_MAX ];static u32 active_cnt =0 ; -static void vt8500_irq_mask (struct irq_data *d) +static void vt8500_irq_ack (struct irq_data *d) {struct vt8500_irq_data *priv = d->domain->host_data;void __iomem *base = priv->base;void __iomem *stat_reg = base +VT8500_ICIS + (d->hwirq <32 ?0 :4 ); -u8 edge, dctr; -u32 status; - - edge =readb (base +VT8500_ICDC + d->hwirq) &VT8500_EDGE ; -if (edge) { - status =readl (stat_reg); - - status |= (1 << (d->hwirq &0x1f )); -writel (status, stat_reg); - }else { - dctr =readb (base +VT8500_ICDC + d->hwirq); - dctr &= ~VT8500_INT_ENABLE ; -writeb (dctr, base +VT8500_ICDC + d->hwirq); - } + +writel (1 << (d->hwirq &0x1f ), stat_reg); +} + +static void vt8500_irq_mask (struct irq_data *d) +{ +struct vt8500_irq_data *priv = d->domain->host_data; +void __iomem *base = priv->base; +u8 dctr; + + dctr =readb (base +VT8500_ICDC + d->hwirq); + dctr &= ~VT8500_INT_ENABLE ; +writeb (dctr, base +VT8500_ICDC + d->hwirq); }static void vt8500_irq_unmask (struct irq_data *d)
@@ -145,7 +144,7 @@ static int vt8500_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int flow_type)static struct irq_chip vt8500_irq_chip = { .name ="vt8500" , - .irq_ack = vt8500_irq_mask, + .irq_ack = vt8500_irq_ack, .irq_mask = vt8500_irq_mask, .irq_unmask = vt8500_irq_unmask, .irq_set_type = vt8500_irq_set_type,
Signature · 1 line
1.8.1.2
2014-05-04 7:14 GMT+04:00 Axel Lin <[email protected]>:
Quoted 7 lines
Current code sets both
irq_ackandirq_maskcallbacks tovt8500_irq_mask(). However,vt8500_irq_maskdoes not clear interrupt enable bit when the interrupt trigger mode is edge trigger.This patch moves the code clearing Interrupt Status Register bit to
irq_ack(). Makeirq_mask()always clear interrupt enable bit for all interrupt trigger mode.
Quoted 8 lines
According to the datasheet, the Interrupt Status Register is written one to clear(Write 0 has no effect). So we don't need a read-modify-write operation for clearing a bit in interrupt status register.
Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>---
Resend and also CC: [email protected]. I appreciate if someone can test this patch.
Axel, I believe the change makes perfect sense. Current code seems to be based on my original code that was in turn based on very limited understanding of the hardware, and furthermore I don't think that any of the existing drivers use edge-triggered interrupts anyway.
The way you've structured it seems more logical, so I would be happy for this to be merged.
Just booted a kernel with this patch on my WM8850, and everything seems to work fine. Can't really say 'Tested-by', though, given the above (no existing uses of edge-triggered interrupts that I'm aware of).
Thanks a lot,
Alexey
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
2014-05-11 23:29 GMT+04:00 lautriv <[email protected]>:
Quoted 3 lines
Alexey, i wonder how you can tell "all works fine" since 8850 is still vomiting a bunch when it comes to I2C or GPIO. Maybe i missed some changes there ?
I've never noticed anything like that on my machine... Note though that I don't use I2C actively (or at all), and I'm currently on mainline 3.15-rc2 with just Rhine patches on top (upstream for 3.16) and some changes in dts to suit my netbook. GPIO works fine for me - I've only applied another one-liner to make 'echo high > direction' work (also upstream now).
I've got a fully functioning Fedora 20 on my WM8850 (except sound and other known-missing parts, of course). It's updating KDE4 as I type :-)
Best,
Alexey