xinetd: change to snapshot.debian.org and add hash
PATCH 1/1 xinetd: change to snapshot.debian.org and add hash
xinetd.org seems down quite some time, so change to snapshot.debian.org. Also add hash.
--- package/xinetd/xinetd.hash | 4 ++++ package/xinetd/xinetd.mk | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 package/xinetd/xinetd.hash
package/xinetd/xinetd.hash new file +4 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +# From snapshot.debian.org dsc file +sha1 168d54aeb181e271e68f4c53847c3e6b2574dba6 xinetd_2.3.15.orig.tar.gz +sha256 bf4e060411c75605e4dcbdf2ac57c6bd9e1904470a2f91e01ba31b50a80a5be3 xinetd_2.3.15.orig.tar.gz +
package/xinetd/xinetd.mk +2 -1
@@ -5,7 +5,8 @@ ################################################################################ XINETD_VERSION = 2.3.15 -XINETD_SITE = http://www.xinetd.org +XINETD_SOURCE = xinetd_$(XINETD_VERSION).orig.tar.gz +XINETD_SITE = http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20141023T043132Z/pool/main/x/xinetd XINETD_LICENSE = xinetd license XINETD_LICENSE_FILES = COPYRIGHT
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
PATCH 1/1 xinetd: change to snapshot.debian.org and add hash
Karoly, All,
On 2014-11-01 17:35 +0100, Karoly Kasza spake thusly:
Quoted 1 line
xinetd.org seems down quite some time, so change to snapshot.debian.org.
Indeed, it's down from here, too... :-(
Quoted 1 line
Also add hash.
Manually downloaded and verified the two hashes.
Quoted 1 line
Signed-off-by Karoly Kasza <[email protected]>
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
Quoted 37 lines
--- package/xinetd/xinetd.hash | 4 ++++ package/xinetd/xinetd.mk | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 package/xinetd/xinetd.hashpackage/xinetd/xinetd.hash new file +4
-0@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +# From snapshot.debian.org dsc file +sha1 168d54aeb181e271e68f4c53847c3e6b2574dba6 xinetd_2.3.15.orig.tar.gz +sha256 bf4e060411c75605e4dcbdf2ac57c6bd9e1904470a2f91e01ba31b50a80a5be3 xinetd_2.3.15.orig.tar.gz +package/xinetd/xinetd.mk +2
-1@@ -5,7 +5,8 @@ ################################################################################ XINETD_VERSION = 2.3.15 -XINETD_SITE = http://www.xinetd.org +XINETD_SOURCE = xinetd_$(XINETD_VERSION).orig.tar.gz +XINETD_SITE = http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20141023T043132Z/pool/main/x/xinetd XINETD_LICENSE = xinetd license XINETD_LICENSE_FILES = COPYRIGHTSignature · 6 lines
1.7.10.4 _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot at busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
Signature · 13 lines
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------' -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20141101/266b2e49/attachment.asc>
PATCH 1/1 xinetd: change to snapshot.debian.org and add hash
In reply to Karoly KaszaDear Karoly Kasza,
package/xinetd/xinetd.mk line 9
Quoted 4 lines · Karoly Kasza
XINETD_VERSION= 2.3.15package/xinetd/xinetd.mk +2
-1-XINETD_SITE = http://www.xinetd.org +XINETD_SOURCE = xinetd_$(XINETD_VERSION).orig.tar.gz +XINETD_SITE = http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20141023T043132Z/pool/main/x/xinetd
Just wondering, isn't https://github.com/xinetd-org/xinetd the new appropriate upstream site?
There is even a 2.3.15 release at
https://github.com/xinetd-org/xinetd/releases.
Thomas
Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
PATCH 1/1 xinetd: change to snapshot.debian.org and add hash
Hi,
I'm not sure, but that seems logical.
The sha256 sum from github.com differs from debian.org. Which one to prefer?
Best regards,
Karoly
Quoted 22 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
Dear Karoly Kasza,
package/xinetd/xinetd.mk
Quoted 4 lines · Karoly Kasza
XINETD_VERSION= 2.3.15package/xinetd/xinetd.mk +2
-1-XINETD_SITE = http://www.xinetd.org +XINETD_SOURCE = xinetd_$(XINETD_VERSION).orig.tar.gz +XINETD_SITE =http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20141023T043132Z/pool/main/x/xinetd
Just wondering, isn't https://github.com/xinetd-org/xinetd the new appropriate upstream site?
There is even a 2.3.15 release at
https://github.com/xinetd-org/xinetd/releases.Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Signature · 5 lines
?dv, KK -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20141101/57fc5e9b/attachment.html>
PATCH 1/1 xinetd: change to snapshot.debian.org and add hash
I've compared the 2 files, and they differ indeed, although the same version.
Mostly $Id changes, and the remove of a FREEBSD conditional macro from somewhere.
I'd say it's safe to use either.
Best regards,
Karoly
Quoted 42 lines · K?roly Kasza
Hi,
I'm not sure, but that seems logical.
The sha256 sum from github.com differs from debian.org. Which one to prefer?Best regards,
KarolyQuoted 13 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
Dear Karoly Kasza,
package/xinetd/xinetd.mk
Quoted 4 lines · Karoly Kasza
XINETD_VERSION= 2.3.15package/xinetd/xinetd.mk +2
-1-XINETD_SITE = http://www.xinetd.org +XINETD_SOURCE = xinetd_$(XINETD_VERSION).orig.tar.gz +XINETD_SITE =http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20141023T043132Z/pool/main/x/xinetd
Just wondering, isn't https://github.com/xinetd-org/xinetd the new appropriate upstream site?
Quoted 9 lines
There is even a 2.3.15 release at
https://github.com/xinetd-org/xinetd/releases.Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com--
?dv,
KK
Signature · 5 lines
?dv, KK -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20141101/b3cfb2fc/attachment.html>
PATCH 1/1 xinetd: change to snapshot.debian.org and add hash
In reply to Károly KaszaK?roly, All,
On 2014-11-01 18:06 +0100, K?roly Kasza spake thusly:
Quoted 3 lines
I'm not sure, but that seems logical.
The sha256 sum from github.com differs from debian.org. Which one to prefer?
Well, I'd say we should switch to the github one.
However, we can't use a hash for those tarballs, since they will be generated, and thus are not reproducible (the content *is* the same, but not the tarball itself).
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.
Quoted 35 lines
Best regards,
KarolyQuoted 22 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
Dear Karoly Kasza,
package/xinetd/xinetd.mk
Quoted 4 lines · Karoly Kasza
XINETD_VERSION= 2.3.15package/xinetd/xinetd.mk +2
-1-XINETD_SITE = http://www.xinetd.org +XINETD_SOURCE = xinetd_$(XINETD_VERSION).orig.tar.gz +XINETD_SITE =http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20141023T043132Z/pool/main/x/xinetd
Just wondering, isn't https://github.com/xinetd-org/xinetd the new appropriate upstream site?
There is even a 2.3.15 release at
https://github.com/xinetd-org/xinetd/releases.Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.comSignature · 2 lines
?dv, KK
Signature · 6 lines
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------. | Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. | '------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
PATCH 1/1 xinetd: change to snapshot.debian.org and add hash
Hi Yann,
I'll send a v2 in minutes.
Best regards,
Karoly
Quoted 67 lines · Yann E. MORIN
K?roly, All,
On 2014-11-01 18:06 +0100, K?roly Kasza spake thusly:
Quoted 3 lines
I'm not sure, but that seems logical.
The sha256 sum from github.com differs from debian.org. Which one to prefer?Well, I'd say we should switch to the github one.
However, we can't use a hash for those tarballs, since they will be generated, and thus are not reproducible (the content *is* the same, but not the tarball itself).
Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.Quoted 15 lines
Best regards,
KarolyQuoted 9 lines · Thomas Petazzoni
Dear Karoly Kasza,
Quoted 4 lines · Karoly Kasza
XINETD_VERSION= 2.3.15package/xinetd/xinetd.mk +2
-1-XINETD_SITE = http://www.xinetd.org +XINETD_SOURCE = xinetd_$(XINETD_VERSION).orig.tar.gz +XINETD_SITE =http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20141023T043132Z/pool/main/x/xinetd
Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Just wondering, isn't https://github.com/xinetd-org/xinetd the new appropriate upstream site?
Quoted 9 lines
There is even a 2.3.15 release at
https://github.com/xinetd-org/xinetd/releases.Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.comQuoted 4 lines
--
?dv,
KK--
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
| Yann E. MORIN | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: | | +33 662 376 056 | Software Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN | ___ | | +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------: X AGAINST | \e/ There is no | | http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL | v conspiracy. |'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
Signature · 5 lines
?dv, KK -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20141101/7c89a97d/attachment.html>