Skip to contentSkip to conversation

xinetd: change to snapshot.debian.org and add hash

PATCH New Karoly Kasza 3 participants 7 messages Nov 1, 2014

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 xinetd: change to snapshot.debian.org and add hash

xinetd.org seems down quite some time, so change to snapshot.debian.org. Also add hash.

---
 package/xinetd/xinetd.hash |    4 ++++
 package/xinetd/xinetd.mk   |    3 ++-
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 package/xinetd/xinetd.hash
package/xinetd/xinetd.hash new file +4 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f656422
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+# From snapshot.debian.org dsc file
+sha1	168d54aeb181e271e68f4c53847c3e6b2574dba6				xinetd_2.3.15.orig.tar.gz
+sha256	bf4e060411c75605e4dcbdf2ac57c6bd9e1904470a2f91e01ba31b50a80a5be3	xinetd_2.3.15.orig.tar.gz
+
package/xinetd/xinetd.mk +2 -1
index 1fb91b5..7060f0c 100644
@@ -5,7 +5,8 @@
 ################################################################################
 
 XINETD_VERSION = 2.3.15
-XINETD_SITE = http://www.xinetd.org
+XINETD_SOURCE = xinetd_$(XINETD_VERSION).orig.tar.gz
+XINETD_SITE = http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20141023T043132Z/pool/main/x/xinetd
 XINETD_LICENSE = xinetd license
 XINETD_LICENSE_FILES = COPYRIGHT
 
Signature · 1 line
1.7.10.4
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 xinetd: change to snapshot.debian.org and add hash

Karoly, All,

On 2014-11-01 17:35 +0100, Karoly Kasza spake thusly:

Quoted 1 line

xinetd.org seems down quite some time, so change to snapshot.debian.org.

Indeed, it's down from here, too... :-(

Quoted 1 line

Also add hash.

Manually downloaded and verified the two hashes.

Quoted 1 line

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

Quoted 37 lines
---
 package/xinetd/xinetd.hash |    4 ++++
 package/xinetd/xinetd.mk   |    3 ++-
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 package/xinetd/xinetd.hash
package/xinetd/xinetd.hash new file +4 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f656422
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+# From snapshot.debian.org dsc file
+sha1	168d54aeb181e271e68f4c53847c3e6b2574dba6				xinetd_2.3.15.orig.tar.gz
+sha256	bf4e060411c75605e4dcbdf2ac57c6bd9e1904470a2f91e01ba31b50a80a5be3	xinetd_2.3.15.orig.tar.gz
+
package/xinetd/xinetd.mk +2 -1
index 1fb91b5..7060f0c 100644
@@ -5,7 +5,8 @@
 ################################################################################
 
 XINETD_VERSION = 2.3.15
-XINETD_SITE = http://www.xinetd.org
+XINETD_SOURCE = xinetd_$(XINETD_VERSION).orig.tar.gz
+XINETD_SITE = http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20141023T043132Z/pool/main/x/xinetd
 XINETD_LICENSE = xinetd license
 XINETD_LICENSE_FILES = COPYRIGHT
 
Signature · 6 lines
1.7.10.4

_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot at busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
Signature · 13 lines
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20141101/266b2e49/attachment.asc>
#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 xinetd: change to snapshot.debian.org and add hash

In reply to Karoly Kasza

Dear Karoly Kasza,

package/xinetd/xinetd.mk line 9

Quoted 4 lines · Karoly Kasza

XINETD_VERSION = 2.3.15

package/xinetd/xinetd.mk +2 -1
-XINETD_SITE = http://www.xinetd.org
+XINETD_SOURCE = xinetd_$(XINETD_VERSION).orig.tar.gz
+XINETD_SITE = http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20141023T043132Z/pool/main/x/xinetd

Just wondering, isn't https://github.com/xinetd-org/xinetd the new appropriate upstream site?

There is even a 2.3.15 release at
https://github.com/xinetd-org/xinetd/releases.

Thomas

Signature · 3 lines
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
#3 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 xinetd: change to snapshot.debian.org and add hash

Hi,

I'm not sure, but that seems logical.
The sha256 sum from github.com differs from debian.org. Which one to prefer?

Best regards,
Karoly

Quoted 22 lines · Thomas Petazzoni

Dear Karoly Kasza,

package/xinetd/xinetd.mk

Quoted 4 lines · Karoly Kasza

XINETD_VERSION = 2.3.15

package/xinetd/xinetd.mk +2 -1
-XINETD_SITE = http://www.xinetd.org
+XINETD_SOURCE = xinetd_$(XINETD_VERSION).orig.tar.gz
+XINETD_SITE =

http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20141023T043132Z/pool/main/x/xinetd

Just wondering, isn't https://github.com/xinetd-org/xinetd the new appropriate upstream site?

There is even a 2.3.15 release at
https://github.com/xinetd-org/xinetd/releases.

Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Signature · 5 lines
?dv,
KK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20141101/57fc5e9b/attachment.html>
#4 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 xinetd: change to snapshot.debian.org and add hash

I've compared the 2 files, and they differ indeed, although the same version.
Mostly $Id changes, and the remove of a FREEBSD conditional macro from somewhere.
I'd say it's safe to use either.

Best regards,
Karoly

Quoted 42 lines · K?roly Kasza

Hi,

I'm not sure, but that seems logical.
The sha256 sum from github.com differs from debian.org. Which one to prefer?

Best regards,
Karoly

Quoted 13 lines · Thomas Petazzoni

Dear Karoly Kasza,

package/xinetd/xinetd.mk

Quoted 4 lines · Karoly Kasza

XINETD_VERSION = 2.3.15

package/xinetd/xinetd.mk +2 -1
-XINETD_SITE = http://www.xinetd.org
+XINETD_SOURCE = xinetd_$(XINETD_VERSION).orig.tar.gz
+XINETD_SITE =

http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20141023T043132Z/pool/main/x/xinetd

Just wondering, isn't https://github.com/xinetd-org/xinetd the new appropriate upstream site?

Quoted 9 lines

There is even a 2.3.15 release at
https://github.com/xinetd-org/xinetd/releases.

Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

--

?dv,
KK

Signature · 5 lines
?dv,
KK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20141101/b3cfb2fc/attachment.html>
#5 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 xinetd: change to snapshot.debian.org and add hash

In reply to Károly Kasza

K?roly, All,

On 2014-11-01 18:06 +0100, K?roly Kasza spake thusly:

Quoted 3 lines

I'm not sure, but that seems logical.
The sha256 sum from github.com differs from debian.org. Which one to prefer?

Well, I'd say we should switch to the github one.

However, we can't use a hash for those tarballs, since they will be generated, and thus are not reproducible (the content *is* the same, but not the tarball itself).

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

Quoted 35 lines

Best regards,
Karoly

Quoted 22 lines · Thomas Petazzoni

Dear Karoly Kasza,

package/xinetd/xinetd.mk

Quoted 4 lines · Karoly Kasza

XINETD_VERSION = 2.3.15

package/xinetd/xinetd.mk +2 -1
-XINETD_SITE = http://www.xinetd.org
+XINETD_SOURCE = xinetd_$(XINETD_VERSION).orig.tar.gz
+XINETD_SITE =

http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20141023T043132Z/pool/main/x/xinetd

Just wondering, isn't https://github.com/xinetd-org/xinetd the new appropriate upstream site?

There is even a 2.3.15 release at
https://github.com/xinetd-org/xinetd/releases.

Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Signature · 2 lines
?dv,
KK
Signature · 6 lines
.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.
|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics' conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___               |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v   conspiracy.  |
'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'
#6 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 xinetd: change to snapshot.debian.org and add hash

Hi Yann,

I'll send a v2 in minutes.

Best regards,
Karoly

Quoted 67 lines · Yann E. MORIN

K?roly, All,

On 2014-11-01 18:06 +0100, K?roly Kasza spake thusly:

Quoted 3 lines

I'm not sure, but that seems logical.
The sha256 sum from github.com differs from debian.org. Which one to prefer?

Well, I'd say we should switch to the github one.

However, we can't use a hash for those tarballs, since they will be generated, and thus are not reproducible (the content *is* the same, but not the tarball itself).

Regards,
Yann E. MORIN.

Quoted 15 lines

Best regards,
Karoly

Quoted 9 lines · Thomas Petazzoni

Dear Karoly Kasza,

Quoted 4 lines · Karoly Kasza

XINETD_VERSION = 2.3.15

package/xinetd/xinetd.mk +2 -1
-XINETD_SITE = http://www.xinetd.org
+XINETD_SOURCE = xinetd_$(XINETD_VERSION).orig.tar.gz
+XINETD_SITE =

http://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian/20141023T043132Z/pool/main/x/xinetd

Quoted 16 lines
Quoted 4 lines

Just wondering, isn't https://github.com/xinetd-org/xinetd the new appropriate upstream site?

Quoted 9 lines

There is even a 2.3.15 release at
https://github.com/xinetd-org/xinetd/releases.

Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Quoted 4 lines

--

?dv,
KK

--

.-----------------.--------------------.------------------.--------------------.

|  Yann E. MORIN  | Real-Time Embedded | /"\ ASCII RIBBON | Erics'
conspiracy: |
| +33 662 376 056 | Software  Designer | \ / CAMPAIGN     |  ___
     |
| +33 223 225 172 `------------.-------:  X  AGAINST      |  \e/  There
is no  |
| http://ymorin.is-a-geek.org/ | _/*\_ | / \ HTML MAIL    |   v
 conspiracy.  |

'------------------------------^-------^------------------^--------------------'

Signature · 5 lines
?dv,
KK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20141101/7c89a97d/attachment.html>