untracked-cache: fix subdirectory handling
PATCH v3 1/1 untracked-cache: fix subdirectory handling
Previously, some calls lookup_untracked would pass a full path. But lookup_untracked assumes that the portion of the path up to and including to the untracked_cache_dir has been removed. So lookup_untracked would be looking in the untracked_cache for 'foo' for 'foo/bar' (instead of just looking for 'bar'). This would cause untracked cache corruption.
Instead, treat_directory learns to track the base length of the parent directory, so that only the last path component is passed to lookup_untracked.
---
This version incorporates Duy's version of the dir.c code, and his suggested test speedup.
--- dir.c | 14 ++++---- t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
dir.c +8 -6
@@ -1297,7 +1297,7 @@ static enum exist_status directory_exists_in_index(const char *dirname, int len)*/ static enum path_treatment treat_directory (struct dir_struct *dir,struct untracked_cache_dir *untracked, -const char *dirname,int len,int exclude, +const char *dirname,int len,int baselen,int exclude,const struct path_simplify *simplify) {/* The "len-1" is to strip the final '/' */
@@ -1324,7 +1324,8 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_directory(struct dir_struct *dir,if (!(dir->flags &DIR_HIDE_EMPTY_DIRECTORIES ))return exclude ? path_excluded : path_untracked; - untracked =lookup_untracked (dir->untracked, untracked, dirname, len); + untracked =lookup_untracked (dir->untracked, untracked, + dirname + baselen, len - baselen);return read_directory_recursive (dir, dirname, len, untracked,1 , simplify); }
@@ -1444,6 +1445,7 @@ static int get_dtype(struct dirent *de, const char *path, int len)static enum path_treatment treat_one_path (struct dir_struct *dir,struct untracked_cache_dir *untracked,struct strbuf *path, +int baselen,const struct path_simplify *simplify,int dtype,struct dirent *de) {
@@ -1495,8 +1497,8 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_one_path(struct dir_struct *dir,return path_none;case DT_DIR :strbuf_addch (path,'/' ); -return treat_directory (dir, untracked, path->buf, path->len, exclude, - simplify); +return treat_directory (dir, untracked, path->buf, path->len, + baselen, exclude, simplify);case DT_REG :case DT_LNK :return exclude ? path_excluded : path_untracked;
@@ -1557,7 +1559,7 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_path(struct dir_struct *dir,return path_none; dtype =DTYPE (de); -return treat_one_path (dir, untracked, path, simplify, dtype, de); +return treat_one_path (dir, untracked, path, baselen, simplify, dtype, de); }static void add_untracked (struct untracked_cache_dir *dir,const char *name)
@@ -1827,7 +1829,7 @@ static int treat_leading_path(struct dir_struct *dir,break ;if (simplify_away (sb.buf, sb.len, simplify))break ; -if (treat_one_path (dir,NULL , &sb, simplify, +if (treat_one_path (dir,NULL , &sb, baselen, simplify,DT_DIR ,NULL ) == path_none)break ;/* do not recurse into it */ if (len <= baselen) {
t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh +72 -2
101 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.4.2.622.gac67c30-twtrsrc
Quoted 10 lines · David Turner
Previously, some calls
lookup_untrackedwould pass a full path. Butlookup_untrackedassumes that the portion of the path up to and including to theuntracked_cache_dirhas been removed. Solookup_untrackedwould be looking in theuntracked_cachefor 'foo' for 'foo/bar' (instead of just looking for 'bar'). This would cause untracked cache corruption.Instead,
treat_directorylearns to track the base length of the parent directory, so that only the last path component is passed tolookup_untracked.
Your v2 also fixes untracked_cache_invalidate_path(), which is not included here. Maybe it's in another patch?
Quoted 185 lines
Helped-by Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <[email protected]>Signed-off-by David Turner <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <[email protected]>---
This version incorporates Duy's version of the
dir.ccode, and his suggested test speedup.--- dir.c | 14 ++++---- t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)dir.c +8
-6@@ -1297,7 +1297,7 @@ static enum exist_status directory_exists_in_index(const char *dirname, int len)*/ static enum path_treatment treat_directory (struct dir_struct *dir,struct untracked_cache_dir *untracked, -const char *dirname,int len,int exclude, +const char *dirname,int len,int baselen,int exclude,const struct path_simplify *simplify) {/* The "len-1" is to strip the final '/' */ @@ -1324,7 +1324,8 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_directory(struct dir_struct *dir,if (!(dir->flags &DIR_HIDE_EMPTY_DIRECTORIES ))return exclude ? path_excluded : path_untracked; - untracked =lookup_untracked (dir->untracked, untracked, dirname, len); + untracked =lookup_untracked (dir->untracked, untracked, + dirname + baselen, len - baselen);return read_directory_recursive (dir, dirname, len, untracked,1 , simplify); }@@ -1444,6 +1445,7 @@ static int get_dtype(struct dirent *de, const char *path, int len)static enum path_treatment treat_one_path (struct dir_struct *dir,struct untracked_cache_dir *untracked,struct strbuf *path, +int baselen,const struct path_simplify *simplify,int dtype,struct dirent *de) {@@ -1495,8 +1497,8 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_one_path(struct dir_struct *dir,return path_none;case DT_DIR :strbuf_addch (path,'/' ); -return treat_directory (dir, untracked, path->buf, path->len, exclude, - simplify); +return treat_directory (dir, untracked, path->buf, path->len, + baselen, exclude, simplify);case DT_REG :case DT_LNK :return exclude ? path_excluded : path_untracked;@@ -1557,7 +1559,7 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_path(struct dir_struct *dir,return path_none; dtype =DTYPE (de); -return treat_one_path (dir, untracked, path, simplify, dtype, de); +return treat_one_path (dir, untracked, path, baselen, simplify, dtype, de); }static void add_untracked (struct untracked_cache_dir *dir,const char *name)@@ -1827,7 +1829,7 @@ static int treat_leading_path(struct dir_struct *dir,break ;if (simplify_away (sb.buf, sb.len, simplify))break ; -if (treat_one_path (dir,NULL , &sb, simplify, +if (treat_one_path (dir,NULL , &sb, baselen, simplify,DT_DIR ,NULL ) == path_none)break ;/* do not recurse into it */ if (len <= baselen) {t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh +72
-3@@ -402,13 +402,14 @@ test_expect_success 'set up sparse checkout' ' echo "done/[a-z]*" >.git/info/sparse-checkout && test_config core.sparsecheckout true && git checkout master && - git update-index --untracked-cache && + git update-index --untracked-cache --force-untracked-cache && git status --porcelain >/dev/null && # prime the cache test_path_is_missing done/.gitignore && test_path_is_file done/one ' -test_expect_success 'create files, some of which are gitignored' ' +test_expect_success 'create/modify files, some of which are gitignored' ' + echo two bis >done/two && echo three >done/three && # three is gitignored echo four >done/four && # four is gitignored at a higher level echo five >done/five # five is not gitignored@@ -420,6 +421,7 @@ test_expect_success 'test sparse status with untracked cache' ' GIT_TRACE_UNTRACKED_STATS="$TRASH_DIRECTORY/trace" \ git status --porcelain >../status.actual && cat >../status.expect <<EOF && + M done/two ?? .gitignore ?? done/five ?? dtwo/@@ -459,6 +461,7 @@ test_expect_success 'test sparse status again with untracked cache' ' GIT_TRACE_UNTRACKED_STATS="$TRASH_DIRECTORY/trace" \ git status --porcelain >../status.actual && cat >../status.expect <<EOF && + M done/two ?? .gitignore ?? done/five ?? dtwo/@@ -473,4 +476,71 @@ EOF test_cmp ../trace.expect ../trace ' +test_expect_success 'set up for test of subdir and sparse checkouts' ' + mkdir done/sub && + mkdir done/sub/sub && + echo "sub" > done/sub/sub/file +' + +test_expect_success 'test sparse status with untracked cache and subdir' ' + avoid_racy && + : >../trace && + GIT_TRACE_UNTRACKED_STATS="$TRASH_DIRECTORY/trace" \ + git status --porcelain >../status.actual && + cat >../status.expect <<EOF && + M done/two +?? .gitignore +?? done/five +?? done/sub/ +?? dtwo/ +EOF + test_cmp ../status.expect ../status.actual && + cat >../trace.expect <<EOF && +node creation: 2 +gitignore invalidation: 0 +directory invalidation: 1 +opendir: 3 +EOF + test_cmp ../trace.expect ../trace +' + +test_expect_success 'verify untracked cache dump (sparse/subdirs)' ' + test-dump-untracked-cache >../actual && + cat >../expect <<EOF && +info/exclude 13263c0978fb9fad16b2d580fb800b6d811c3ff0 +core.excludesfile 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 +exclude_per_dir .gitignore +flags 00000006 +/ e6fcc8f2ee31bae321d66afd183fcb7237afae6e recurse valid +.gitignore +dtwo/ +/done/ 1946f0437f90c5005533cbe1736a6451ca301714 recurse valid +five +sub/ +/done/sub/ 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 recurse check_only valid +sub/ +/done/sub/sub/ 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 recurse check_only valid +file +/dthree/ 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 recurse check_only valid +/dtwo/ 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 recurse check_only valid +two +EOF + test_cmp ../expect ../actual +' + +test_expect_success 'test sparse status again with untracked cache and subdir' ' + avoid_racy && + : >../trace && + GIT_TRACE_UNTRACKED_STATS="$TRASH_DIRECTORY/trace" \ + git status --porcelain >../status.actual && + test_cmp ../status.expect ../status.actual && + cat >../trace.expect <<EOF && +node creation: 0 +gitignore invalidation: 0 +directory invalidation: 0 +opendir: 0 +EOF + test_cmp ../trace.expect ../trace +' + test_done --2.4.2.622.gac67c30-twtrsrc
Signature · 1 line
Duy
Quoted 8 lines · Duy Nguyen
Quoted 7 lines · David Turner
Previously, some calls
lookup_untrackedwould pass a full path. Butlookup_untrackedassumes that the portion of the path up to and including to theuntracked_cache_dirhas been removed. Solookup_untrackedwould be looking in theuntracked_cachefor 'foo' for 'foo/bar' (instead of just looking for 'bar'). This would cause untracked cache corruption.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Instead,
treat_directorylearns to track the base length of the parent directory, so that only the last path component is passed tolookup_untracked.Your v2 also fixes
untracked_cache_invalidate_path(), which is not included here. Maybe it's in another patch?
No I was wrong. Your changes and the original code are effectively the same (I misread strrchr as strchr). But I think there's a bug somewhere as I'm writing tests to understand that code..
Signature · 1 line
Duy
v4 cover dt/untracked-subdir
In reply to David TurnerThe first patch is a split from David's v3 patch because it should belong to dt/untracked-sparse. The second is basically David's v3. The third patch fixes untracked_cache_invalidate_path(). David fixed it in v2, but there's another bug in this code.
David Turner (1):
untracked-cache: fix subdirectory handling
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy (2):
t7063: use --force-untracked-cache to speed up a bit untracked cache: fix entry invalidation
dir.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++------- t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.3.0.rc1.137.g477eb31
PATCH v4 1/3 t7063: use --force-untracked-cache to speed up a bit
When in the middle of t7063, we are sure untracked cache is supported, so we can use --force-untracked-cache to skip the support detection phase and save a few seconds. It's also good that --force-untracked-cache is exercised in the test suite.
--- t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh +1 -1
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ test_expect_success 'set up sparse checkout' ' echo "done/[a-z]*" >.git/info/sparse-checkout && test_config core.sparsecheckout true && git checkout master && - git update-index --untracked-cache && + git update-index --force-untracked-cache && git status --porcelain >/dev/null && # prime the cache test_path_is_missing done/.gitignore && test_path_is_file done/one
Signature · 1 line
2.3.0.rc1.137.g477eb31
PATCH v4 2/3 untracked-cache: fix subdirectory handling
In reply to Nguyễn Thái Ngọc DuyFrom: David Turner <[email protected]>
Previously, some calls lookup_untracked would pass a full path. But lookup_untracked assumes that the portion of the path up to and including to the untracked_cache_dir has been removed. So lookup_untracked would be looking in the untracked_cache for 'foo' for 'foo/bar' (instead of just looking for 'bar'). This would cause untracked cache corruption.
Instead, treat_directory learns to track the base length of the parent directory, so that only the last path component is passed to lookup_untracked.
--- dir.c | 14 ++++---- t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
dir.c +8 -6
@@ -1297,7 +1297,7 @@ static enum exist_status directory_exists_in_index(const char *dirname, int len)*/ static enum path_treatment treat_directory (struct dir_struct *dir,struct untracked_cache_dir *untracked, -const char *dirname,int len,int exclude, +const char *dirname,int len,int baselen,int exclude,const struct path_simplify *simplify) {/* The "len-1" is to strip the final '/' */
@@ -1324,7 +1324,8 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_directory(struct dir_struct *dir,if (!(dir->flags &DIR_HIDE_EMPTY_DIRECTORIES ))return exclude ? path_excluded : path_untracked; - untracked =lookup_untracked (dir->untracked, untracked, dirname, len); + untracked =lookup_untracked (dir->untracked, untracked, + dirname + baselen, len - baselen);return read_directory_recursive (dir, dirname, len, untracked,1 , simplify); }
@@ -1444,6 +1445,7 @@ static int get_dtype(struct dirent *de, const char *path, int len)static enum path_treatment treat_one_path (struct dir_struct *dir,struct untracked_cache_dir *untracked,struct strbuf *path, +int baselen,const struct path_simplify *simplify,int dtype,struct dirent *de) {
@@ -1495,8 +1497,8 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_one_path(struct dir_struct *dir,return path_none;case DT_DIR :strbuf_addch (path,'/' ); -return treat_directory (dir, untracked, path->buf, path->len, exclude, - simplify); +return treat_directory (dir, untracked, path->buf, path->len, + baselen, exclude, simplify);case DT_REG :case DT_LNK :return exclude ? path_excluded : path_untracked;
@@ -1557,7 +1559,7 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_path(struct dir_struct *dir,return path_none; dtype =DTYPE (de); -return treat_one_path (dir, untracked, path, simplify, dtype, de); +return treat_one_path (dir, untracked, path, baselen, simplify, dtype, de); }static void add_untracked (struct untracked_cache_dir *dir,const char *name)
@@ -1827,7 +1829,7 @@ static int treat_leading_path(struct dir_struct *dir,break ;if (simplify_away (sb.buf, sb.len, simplify))break ; -if (treat_one_path (dir,NULL , &sb, simplify, +if (treat_one_path (dir,NULL , &sb, baselen, simplify,DT_DIR ,NULL ) == path_none)break ;/* do not recurse into it */ if (len <= baselen) {
t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh +71 -1
94 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.3.0.rc1.137.g477eb31
PATCH v4 3/3 untracked cache: fix entry invalidation
In reply to Nguyễn Thái Ngọc DuyFirst, the current code in untracked_cache_invalidate_path() is wrong because it can only handle paths "a" or "a/b", not "a/b/c" because lookup_untracked() only looks for entries directly under the given directory. In the last case, it will look for the entry "b/c" in directory "a" instead. This means if you delete or add an entry in a subdirectory, untracked cache may become out of date because it does not invalidate properly. This is noticed by David Turner.
The second problem is about invalidation inside a fully untracked/excluded directory. In this case we may have to invalidate back to root. See the comment block for detail.
--- dir.c | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh | 28 +++++++++++++++- 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
dir.c +56 -12
@@ -2616,23 +2616,67 @@ done2:return uc; } +static void invalidate_one_directory (struct untracked_cache *uc, +struct untracked_cache_dir *ucd) +{ + uc->dir_invalidated++; + ucd->valid =0 ; + ucd->untracked_nr =0 ; +} + +/* +* Normally when an entry is added or removed from a directory, +* invalidating that directory is enough. No need to touch its +* ancestors. When a directory is shown as "foo/bar/" in git-status +* however, deleting or adding an entry may have cascading effect. +* +* Say the "foo/bar/file" has become untracked, we need to tell the +* untracked_cache_dir of "foo" that "bar/" is not an untracked +* directory any more (because "bar" is managed by foo as an untracked +* "file"). +* +* Similarly, if "foo/bar/file" moves from untracked to tracked and it +* was the last untracked entry in the entire "foo", we should show +* "foo/" instead. Which means we have to invalidate past "bar" up to +* "foo". +* +* This function traverses all directories from root to leaf. If there +* is a chance of one of the above cases happening, we invalidate back +* to root. Otherwise we just invalidate the leaf. There may be a more +* sophisticated way than checking for SHOW_OTHER_DIRECTORIES to +* detect these cases and avoid unnecessary invalidation, for example, +* checking for the untracked entry named "bar/" in "foo", but for now +* stick to something safe and simple. +*/ +static int invalidate_one_component (struct untracked_cache *uc, +struct untracked_cache_dir *dir, +const char *path,int len) +{ +const char *rest =strchr (path,'/' ); + +if (rest) { +int component_len = rest - path; +struct untracked_cache_dir *d = +lookup_untracked (uc, dir, path, component_len); +int ret = +invalidate_one_component (uc, d, rest +1 , + len - (component_len +1 )); +if (ret) +invalidate_one_directory (uc, dir); +return ret; + } + +invalidate_one_directory (uc, dir); +return uc->dir_flags &DIR_SHOW_OTHER_DIRECTORIES ; +} +void untracked_cache_invalidate_path (struct index_state *istate,const char *path) { -const char *sep; -struct untracked_cache_dir *d;if (!istate->untracked || !istate->untracked->root)return ; - sep =strrchr (path,'/' ); -if (sep) - d =lookup_untracked (istate->untracked, - istate->untracked->root, - path, sep - path); -else - d = istate->untracked->root; - istate->untracked->dir_invalidated++; - d->valid =0 ; - d->untracked_nr =0 ; +invalidate_one_component (istate->untracked, istate->untracked->root, + path,strlen (path)); } void untracked_cache_remove_from_index(struct index_state *istate,
t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh +27 -1
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ EOF node creation: 0 gitignore invalidation: 0 directory invalidation: 0 -opendir: 1 +opendir: 2 EOF test_cmp ../trace.expect ../trace '
@@ -543,4 +543,30 @@ EOF test_cmp ../trace.expect ../trace ' +test_expect_success 'move entry in subdir from untracked to cached' ' + git add dtwo/two && + git status --porcelain >../status.actual && + cat >../status.expect <<EOF && + M done/two +A dtwo/two +?? .gitignore +?? done/five +?? done/sub/ +EOF + test_cmp ../status.expect ../status.actual +' + +test_expect_success 'move entry in subdir from cached to untracked' ' + git rm --cached dtwo/two && + git status --porcelain >../status.actual && + cat >../status.expect <<EOF && + M done/two +?? .gitignore +?? done/five +?? done/sub/ +?? dtwo/ +EOF + test_cmp ../status.expect ../status.actual +' + test_done
Signature · 1 line
2.3.0.rc1.137.g477eb31
Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] untracked cache: fix entry invalidation
Quoted 11 lines · Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
First, the current code in
untracked_cache_invalidate_path()is wrong because it can only handle paths "a" or "a/b", not "a/b/c" becauselookup_untracked()only looks for entries directly under the given directory. In the last case, it will look for the entry "b/c" in directory "a" instead. This means if you delete or add an entry in a subdirectory, untracked cache may become out of date because it does not invalidate properly. This is noticed by David Turner.The second problem is about invalidation inside a fully untracked/excluded directory. In this case we may have to invalidate back to root. See the comment block for detail.
LGTM.
Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] untracked cache: fix entry invalidation
Quoted 9 lines · David Turner
Quoted 8 lines · Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
First, the current code in
untracked_cache_invalidate_path()is wrong because it can only handle paths "a" or "a/b", not "a/b/c" becauselookup_untracked()only looks for entries directly under the given directory. In the last case, it will look for the entry "b/c" in directory "a" instead. This means if you delete or add an entry in a subdirectory, untracked cache may become out of date because it does not invalidate properly. This is noticed by David Turner.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
The second problem is about invalidation inside a fully untracked/excluded directory. In this case we may have to invalidate back to root. See the comment block for detail.
LGTM.
Thanks, both. Let's move this forward.
Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] dt/untracked-subdir
In reply to Nguyễn Thái Ngọc DuyQuoted 8 lines · Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
The first patch is a split from David's v3 patch because it should belong to dt/untracked-sparse. The second is basically David's v3. The third patch fixes
untracked_cache_invalidate_path(). David fixed it in v2, but there's another bug in this code.David Turner (1):
untracked-cache: fix subdirectory handling
Quoted 7 lines
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy (2):
t7063: use --force-untracked-cache to speed up a bit untracked cache: fix entry invalidationdir.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++------- t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
They all look reasonable. Will replace v3 with these and wait a bit to give chance to David and others to comment.
Thanks.