Skip to contentSkip to conversation

untracked-cache: fix subdirectory handling

PATCH In review David Turner 3 participants 10 messages Jun 15, 2016

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/1 untracked-cache: fix subdirectory handling

Previously, some calls lookup_untracked would pass a full path. But lookup_untracked assumes that the portion of the path up to and including to the untracked_cache_dir has been removed. So lookup_untracked would be looking in the untracked_cache for 'foo' for 'foo/bar' (instead of just looking for 'bar'). This would cause untracked cache corruption.

Instead, treat_directory learns to track the base length of the parent directory, so that only the last path component is passed to lookup_untracked.

---

This version incorporates Duy's version of the dir.c code, and his suggested test speedup.

---
 dir.c                             | 14 ++++----
 t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
dir.c +8 -6
index e7b89fe..cd4ac77 100644
@@ -1297,7 +1297,7 @@ static enum exist_status directory_exists_in_index(const char *dirname, int len)
  */
 static enum path_treatment treat_directory(struct dir_struct *dir,
 	struct untracked_cache_dir *untracked,
-	const char *dirname, int len, int exclude,
+	const char *dirname, int len, int baselen, int exclude,
 	const struct path_simplify *simplify)
 {
 	/* The "len-1" is to strip the final '/' */
@@ -1324,7 +1324,8 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_directory(struct dir_struct *dir,
 	if (!(dir->flags & DIR_HIDE_EMPTY_DIRECTORIES))
 		return exclude ? path_excluded : path_untracked;
 
-	untracked = lookup_untracked(dir->untracked, untracked, dirname, len);
+	untracked = lookup_untracked(dir->untracked, untracked,
+				     dirname + baselen, len - baselen);
 	return read_directory_recursive(dir, dirname, len,
 					untracked, 1, simplify);
 }
@@ -1444,6 +1445,7 @@ static int get_dtype(struct dirent *de, const char *path, int len)
 static enum path_treatment treat_one_path(struct dir_struct *dir,
 					  struct untracked_cache_dir *untracked,
 					  struct strbuf *path,
+					  int baselen,
 					  const struct path_simplify *simplify,
 					  int dtype, struct dirent *de)
 {
@@ -1495,8 +1497,8 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_one_path(struct dir_struct *dir,
 		return path_none;
 	case DT_DIR:
 		strbuf_addch(path, '/');
-		return treat_directory(dir, untracked, path->buf, path->len, exclude,
-			simplify);
+		return treat_directory(dir, untracked, path->buf, path->len,
+				       baselen, exclude, simplify);
 	case DT_REG:
 	case DT_LNK:
 		return exclude ? path_excluded : path_untracked;
@@ -1557,7 +1559,7 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_path(struct dir_struct *dir,
 		return path_none;
 
 	dtype = DTYPE(de);
-	return treat_one_path(dir, untracked, path, simplify, dtype, de);
+	return treat_one_path(dir, untracked, path, baselen, simplify, dtype, de);
 }
 
 static void add_untracked(struct untracked_cache_dir *dir, const char *name)
@@ -1827,7 +1829,7 @@ static int treat_leading_path(struct dir_struct *dir,
 			break;
 		if (simplify_away(sb.buf, sb.len, simplify))
 			break;
-		if (treat_one_path(dir, NULL, &sb, simplify,
+		if (treat_one_path(dir, NULL, &sb, baselen, simplify,
 				   DT_DIR, NULL) == path_none)
 			break; /* do not recurse into it */
 		if (len <= baselen) {
t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh +72 -2

101 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
2.4.2.622.gac67c30-twtrsrc
#1 lore raw
Quoted 10 lines · David Turner

Previously, some calls lookup_untracked would pass a full path. But lookup_untracked assumes that the portion of the path up to and including to the untracked_cache_dir has been removed. So lookup_untracked would be looking in the untracked_cache for 'foo' for 'foo/bar' (instead of just looking for 'bar'). This would cause untracked cache corruption.

Instead, treat_directory learns to track the base length of the parent directory, so that only the last path component is passed to lookup_untracked.

Your v2 also fixes untracked_cache_invalidate_path(), which is not included here. Maybe it's in another patch?

Quoted 185 lines

---

This version incorporates Duy's version of the dir.c code, and his suggested test speedup.

---
 dir.c                             | 14 ++++----
 t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
dir.c +8 -6
index e7b89fe..cd4ac77 100644
@@ -1297,7 +1297,7 @@ static enum exist_status directory_exists_in_index(const char *dirname, int len)
  */
 static enum path_treatment treat_directory(struct dir_struct *dir,
        struct untracked_cache_dir *untracked,
-       const char *dirname, int len, int exclude,
+       const char *dirname, int len, int baselen, int exclude,
        const struct path_simplify *simplify)
 {
        /* The "len-1" is to strip the final '/' */
@@ -1324,7 +1324,8 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_directory(struct dir_struct *dir,
        if (!(dir->flags & DIR_HIDE_EMPTY_DIRECTORIES))
                return exclude ? path_excluded : path_untracked;
 
-       untracked = lookup_untracked(dir->untracked, untracked, dirname, len);
+       untracked = lookup_untracked(dir->untracked, untracked,
+                                    dirname + baselen, len - baselen);
        return read_directory_recursive(dir, dirname, len,
                                        untracked, 1, simplify);
 }
@@ -1444,6 +1445,7 @@ static int get_dtype(struct dirent *de, const char *path, int len)
 static enum path_treatment treat_one_path(struct dir_struct *dir,
                                          struct untracked_cache_dir *untracked,
                                          struct strbuf *path,
+                                         int baselen,
                                          const struct path_simplify *simplify,
                                          int dtype, struct dirent *de)
 {
@@ -1495,8 +1497,8 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_one_path(struct dir_struct *dir,
                return path_none;
        case DT_DIR:
                strbuf_addch(path, '/');
-               return treat_directory(dir, untracked, path->buf, path->len, exclude,
-                       simplify);
+               return treat_directory(dir, untracked, path->buf, path->len,
+                                      baselen, exclude, simplify);
        case DT_REG:
        case DT_LNK:
                return exclude ? path_excluded : path_untracked;
@@ -1557,7 +1559,7 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_path(struct dir_struct *dir,
                return path_none;
 
        dtype = DTYPE(de);
-       return treat_one_path(dir, untracked, path, simplify, dtype, de);
+       return treat_one_path(dir, untracked, path, baselen, simplify, dtype, de);
 }
 
 static void add_untracked(struct untracked_cache_dir *dir, const char *name)
@@ -1827,7 +1829,7 @@ static int treat_leading_path(struct dir_struct *dir,
                        break;
                if (simplify_away(sb.buf, sb.len, simplify))
                        break;
-               if (treat_one_path(dir, NULL, &sb, simplify,
+               if (treat_one_path(dir, NULL, &sb, baselen, simplify,
                                   DT_DIR, NULL) == path_none)
                        break; /* do not recurse into it */
                if (len <= baselen) {
t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh +72 -3
index ff23f4e..6716f69 100755
@@ -402,13 +402,14 @@ test_expect_success 'set up sparse checkout' '
        echo "done/[a-z]*" >.git/info/sparse-checkout &&
        test_config core.sparsecheckout true &&
        git checkout master &&
-       git update-index --untracked-cache &&
+       git update-index --untracked-cache --force-untracked-cache &&
        git status --porcelain >/dev/null && # prime the cache
        test_path_is_missing done/.gitignore &&
        test_path_is_file done/one
 '
 
-test_expect_success 'create files, some of which are gitignored' '
+test_expect_success 'create/modify files, some of which are gitignored' '
+       echo two bis >done/two &&
        echo three >done/three && # three is gitignored
        echo four >done/four && # four is gitignored at a higher level
        echo five >done/five # five is not gitignored
@@ -420,6 +421,7 @@ test_expect_success 'test sparse status with untracked cache' '
        GIT_TRACE_UNTRACKED_STATS="$TRASH_DIRECTORY/trace" \
        git status --porcelain >../status.actual &&
        cat >../status.expect <<EOF &&
+ M done/two
 ?? .gitignore
 ?? done/five
 ?? dtwo/
@@ -459,6 +461,7 @@ test_expect_success 'test sparse status again with untracked cache' '
        GIT_TRACE_UNTRACKED_STATS="$TRASH_DIRECTORY/trace" \
        git status --porcelain >../status.actual &&
        cat >../status.expect <<EOF &&
+ M done/two
 ?? .gitignore
 ?? done/five
 ?? dtwo/
@@ -473,4 +476,71 @@ EOF
        test_cmp ../trace.expect ../trace
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'set up for test of subdir and sparse checkouts' '
+       mkdir done/sub &&
+       mkdir done/sub/sub &&
+       echo "sub" > done/sub/sub/file
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'test sparse status with untracked cache and subdir' '
+       avoid_racy &&
+       : >../trace &&
+       GIT_TRACE_UNTRACKED_STATS="$TRASH_DIRECTORY/trace" \
+       git status --porcelain >../status.actual &&
+       cat >../status.expect <<EOF &&
+ M done/two
+?? .gitignore
+?? done/five
+?? done/sub/
+?? dtwo/
+EOF
+       test_cmp ../status.expect ../status.actual &&
+       cat >../trace.expect <<EOF &&
+node creation: 2
+gitignore invalidation: 0
+directory invalidation: 1
+opendir: 3
+EOF
+       test_cmp ../trace.expect ../trace
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'verify untracked cache dump (sparse/subdirs)' '
+       test-dump-untracked-cache >../actual &&
+       cat >../expect <<EOF &&
+info/exclude 13263c0978fb9fad16b2d580fb800b6d811c3ff0
+core.excludesfile 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
+exclude_per_dir .gitignore
+flags 00000006
+/ e6fcc8f2ee31bae321d66afd183fcb7237afae6e recurse valid
+.gitignore
+dtwo/
+/done/ 1946f0437f90c5005533cbe1736a6451ca301714 recurse valid
+five
+sub/
+/done/sub/ 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 recurse check_only valid
+sub/
+/done/sub/sub/ 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 recurse check_only valid
+file
+/dthree/ 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 recurse check_only valid
+/dtwo/ 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000 recurse check_only valid
+two
+EOF
+       test_cmp ../expect ../actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'test sparse status again with untracked cache and subdir' '
+       avoid_racy &&
+       : >../trace &&
+       GIT_TRACE_UNTRACKED_STATS="$TRASH_DIRECTORY/trace" \
+       git status --porcelain >../status.actual &&
+       test_cmp ../status.expect ../status.actual &&
+       cat >../trace.expect <<EOF &&
+node creation: 0
+gitignore invalidation: 0
+directory invalidation: 0
+opendir: 0
+EOF
+       test_cmp ../trace.expect ../trace
+'
+
 test_done
--

2.4.2.622.gac67c30-twtrsrc

Signature · 1 line
Duy
#2 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · Duy Nguyen
Quoted 7 lines · David Turner

Previously, some calls lookup_untracked would pass a full path. But lookup_untracked assumes that the portion of the path up to and including to the untracked_cache_dir has been removed. So lookup_untracked would be looking in the untracked_cache for 'foo' for 'foo/bar' (instead of just looking for 'bar'). This would cause untracked cache corruption.

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines

Instead, treat_directory learns to track the base length of the parent directory, so that only the last path component is passed to lookup_untracked.

Your v2 also fixes untracked_cache_invalidate_path(), which is not included here. Maybe it's in another patch?

No I was wrong. Your changes and the original code are effectively the same (I misread strrchr as strchr). But I think there's a bug somewhere as I'm writing tests to understand that code..

Signature · 1 line
Duy
#3 lore raw

v4 cover dt/untracked-subdir

In reply to David Turner

The first patch is a split from David's v3 patch because it should belong to dt/untracked-sparse. The second is basically David's v3. The third patch fixes untracked_cache_invalidate_path(). David fixed it in v2, but there's another bug in this code.

David Turner (1):
untracked-cache: fix subdirectory handling

Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy (2):
t7063: use --force-untracked-cache to speed up a bit untracked cache: fix entry invalidation

 dir.c                             |  82 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.3.0.rc1.137.g477eb31
#4 lore raw

PATCH v4 1/3 t7063: use --force-untracked-cache to speed up a bit

When in the middle of t7063, we are sure untracked cache is supported, so we can use --force-untracked-cache to skip the support detection phase and save a few seconds. It's also good that --force-untracked-cache is exercised in the test suite.

---
 t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh +1 -1
index ff23f4e..744e922 100755
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ test_expect_success 'set up sparse checkout' '
 	echo "done/[a-z]*" >.git/info/sparse-checkout &&
 	test_config core.sparsecheckout true &&
 	git checkout master &&
-	git update-index --untracked-cache &&
+	git update-index --force-untracked-cache &&
 	git status --porcelain >/dev/null && # prime the cache
 	test_path_is_missing done/.gitignore &&
 	test_path_is_file done/one
Signature · 1 line
2.3.0.rc1.137.g477eb31
#5 lore raw

PATCH v4 2/3 untracked-cache: fix subdirectory handling

In reply to Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy

From: David Turner <[email protected]>

Previously, some calls lookup_untracked would pass a full path. But lookup_untracked assumes that the portion of the path up to and including to the untracked_cache_dir has been removed. So lookup_untracked would be looking in the untracked_cache for 'foo' for 'foo/bar' (instead of just looking for 'bar'). This would cause untracked cache corruption.

Instead, treat_directory learns to track the base length of the parent directory, so that only the last path component is passed to lookup_untracked.

---
 dir.c                             | 14 ++++----
 t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
dir.c +8 -6
index e7b89fe..cd4ac77 100644
@@ -1297,7 +1297,7 @@ static enum exist_status directory_exists_in_index(const char *dirname, int len)
  */
 static enum path_treatment treat_directory(struct dir_struct *dir,
 	struct untracked_cache_dir *untracked,
-	const char *dirname, int len, int exclude,
+	const char *dirname, int len, int baselen, int exclude,
 	const struct path_simplify *simplify)
 {
 	/* The "len-1" is to strip the final '/' */
@@ -1324,7 +1324,8 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_directory(struct dir_struct *dir,
 	if (!(dir->flags & DIR_HIDE_EMPTY_DIRECTORIES))
 		return exclude ? path_excluded : path_untracked;
 
-	untracked = lookup_untracked(dir->untracked, untracked, dirname, len);
+	untracked = lookup_untracked(dir->untracked, untracked,
+				     dirname + baselen, len - baselen);
 	return read_directory_recursive(dir, dirname, len,
 					untracked, 1, simplify);
 }
@@ -1444,6 +1445,7 @@ static int get_dtype(struct dirent *de, const char *path, int len)
 static enum path_treatment treat_one_path(struct dir_struct *dir,
 					  struct untracked_cache_dir *untracked,
 					  struct strbuf *path,
+					  int baselen,
 					  const struct path_simplify *simplify,
 					  int dtype, struct dirent *de)
 {
@@ -1495,8 +1497,8 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_one_path(struct dir_struct *dir,
 		return path_none;
 	case DT_DIR:
 		strbuf_addch(path, '/');
-		return treat_directory(dir, untracked, path->buf, path->len, exclude,
-			simplify);
+		return treat_directory(dir, untracked, path->buf, path->len,
+				       baselen, exclude, simplify);
 	case DT_REG:
 	case DT_LNK:
 		return exclude ? path_excluded : path_untracked;
@@ -1557,7 +1559,7 @@ static enum path_treatment treat_path(struct dir_struct *dir,
 		return path_none;
 
 	dtype = DTYPE(de);
-	return treat_one_path(dir, untracked, path, simplify, dtype, de);
+	return treat_one_path(dir, untracked, path, baselen, simplify, dtype, de);
 }
 
 static void add_untracked(struct untracked_cache_dir *dir, const char *name)
@@ -1827,7 +1829,7 @@ static int treat_leading_path(struct dir_struct *dir,
 			break;
 		if (simplify_away(sb.buf, sb.len, simplify))
 			break;
-		if (treat_one_path(dir, NULL, &sb, simplify,
+		if (treat_one_path(dir, NULL, &sb, baselen, simplify,
 				   DT_DIR, NULL) == path_none)
 			break; /* do not recurse into it */
 		if (len <= baselen) {
t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh +71 -1

94 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
2.3.0.rc1.137.g477eb31
#6 lore raw

PATCH v4 3/3 untracked cache: fix entry invalidation

In reply to Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy

First, the current code in untracked_cache_invalidate_path() is wrong because it can only handle paths "a" or "a/b", not "a/b/c" because lookup_untracked() only looks for entries directly under the given directory. In the last case, it will look for the entry "b/c" in directory "a" instead. This means if you delete or add an entry in a subdirectory, untracked cache may become out of date because it does not invalidate properly. This is noticed by David Turner.

The second problem is about invalidation inside a fully untracked/excluded directory. In this case we may have to invalidate back to root. See the comment block for detail.

---
 dir.c                             | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh | 28 +++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
dir.c +56 -12
index cd4ac77..c1edabf 100644
@@ -2616,23 +2616,67 @@ done2:
 	return uc;
 }
 
+static void invalidate_one_directory(struct untracked_cache *uc,
+				     struct untracked_cache_dir *ucd)
+{
+	uc->dir_invalidated++;
+	ucd->valid = 0;
+	ucd->untracked_nr = 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Normally when an entry is added or removed from a directory,
+ * invalidating that directory is enough. No need to touch its
+ * ancestors. When a directory is shown as "foo/bar/" in git-status
+ * however, deleting or adding an entry may have cascading effect.
+ *
+ * Say the "foo/bar/file" has become untracked, we need to tell the
+ * untracked_cache_dir of "foo" that "bar/" is not an untracked
+ * directory any more (because "bar" is managed by foo as an untracked
+ * "file").
+ *
+ * Similarly, if "foo/bar/file" moves from untracked to tracked and it
+ * was the last untracked entry in the entire "foo", we should show
+ * "foo/" instead. Which means we have to invalidate past "bar" up to
+ * "foo".
+ *
+ * This function traverses all directories from root to leaf. If there
+ * is a chance of one of the above cases happening, we invalidate back
+ * to root. Otherwise we just invalidate the leaf. There may be a more
+ * sophisticated way than checking for SHOW_OTHER_DIRECTORIES to
+ * detect these cases and avoid unnecessary invalidation, for example,
+ * checking for the untracked entry named "bar/" in "foo", but for now
+ * stick to something safe and simple.
+ */
+static int invalidate_one_component(struct untracked_cache *uc,
+				    struct untracked_cache_dir *dir,
+				    const char *path, int len)
+{
+	const char *rest = strchr(path, '/');
+
+	if (rest) {
+		int component_len = rest - path;
+		struct untracked_cache_dir *d =
+			lookup_untracked(uc, dir, path, component_len);
+		int ret =
+			invalidate_one_component(uc, d, rest + 1,
+						 len - (component_len + 1));
+		if (ret)
+			invalidate_one_directory(uc, dir);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	invalidate_one_directory(uc, dir);
+	return uc->dir_flags & DIR_SHOW_OTHER_DIRECTORIES;
+}
+
 void untracked_cache_invalidate_path(struct index_state *istate,
 				     const char *path)
 {
-	const char *sep;
-	struct untracked_cache_dir *d;
 	if (!istate->untracked || !istate->untracked->root)
 		return;
-	sep = strrchr(path, '/');
-	if (sep)
-		d = lookup_untracked(istate->untracked,
-				     istate->untracked->root,
-				     path, sep - path);
-	else
-		d = istate->untracked->root;
-	istate->untracked->dir_invalidated++;
-	d->valid = 0;
-	d->untracked_nr = 0;
+	invalidate_one_component(istate->untracked, istate->untracked->root,
+				 path, strlen(path));
 }
 
 void untracked_cache_remove_from_index(struct index_state *istate,
t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh +27 -1
index 22393b9..37a24c1 100755
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ EOF
 node creation: 0
 gitignore invalidation: 0
 directory invalidation: 0
-opendir: 1
+opendir: 2
 EOF
 	test_cmp ../trace.expect ../trace
 '
@@ -543,4 +543,30 @@ EOF
 	test_cmp ../trace.expect ../trace
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'move entry in subdir from untracked to cached' '
+	git add dtwo/two &&
+	git status --porcelain >../status.actual &&
+	cat >../status.expect <<EOF &&
+ M done/two
+A  dtwo/two
+?? .gitignore
+?? done/five
+?? done/sub/
+EOF
+	test_cmp ../status.expect ../status.actual
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'move entry in subdir from cached to untracked' '
+	git rm --cached dtwo/two &&
+	git status --porcelain >../status.actual &&
+	cat >../status.expect <<EOF &&
+ M done/two
+?? .gitignore
+?? done/five
+?? done/sub/
+?? dtwo/
+EOF
+	test_cmp ../status.expect ../status.actual
+'
+
 test_done
Signature · 1 line
2.3.0.rc1.137.g477eb31
#7 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] untracked cache: fix entry invalidation

Quoted 11 lines · Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy

First, the current code in untracked_cache_invalidate_path() is wrong because it can only handle paths "a" or "a/b", not "a/b/c" because lookup_untracked() only looks for entries directly under the given directory. In the last case, it will look for the entry "b/c" in directory "a" instead. This means if you delete or add an entry in a subdirectory, untracked cache may become out of date because it does not invalidate properly. This is noticed by David Turner.

The second problem is about invalidation inside a fully untracked/excluded directory. In this case we may have to invalidate back to root. See the comment block for detail.

LGTM.

#8 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] untracked cache: fix entry invalidation

Quoted 9 lines · David Turner
Quoted 8 lines · Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy

First, the current code in untracked_cache_invalidate_path() is wrong because it can only handle paths "a" or "a/b", not "a/b/c" because lookup_untracked() only looks for entries directly under the given directory. In the last case, it will look for the entry "b/c" in directory "a" instead. This means if you delete or add an entry in a subdirectory, untracked cache may become out of date because it does not invalidate properly. This is noticed by David Turner.

Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

The second problem is about invalidation inside a fully untracked/excluded directory. In this case we may have to invalidate back to root. See the comment block for detail.

LGTM.

Thanks, both. Let's move this forward.

#9 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] dt/untracked-subdir

In reply to Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
Quoted 8 lines · Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy

The first patch is a split from David's v3 patch because it should belong to dt/untracked-sparse. The second is basically David's v3. The third patch fixes untracked_cache_invalidate_path(). David fixed it in v2, but there's another bug in this code.

David Turner (1):
untracked-cache: fix subdirectory handling

Quoted 7 lines

Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy (2):
t7063: use --force-untracked-cache to speed up a bit untracked cache: fix entry invalidation

 dir.c                             |  82 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 t/t7063-status-untracked-cache.sh | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

They all look reasonable. Will replace v3 with these and wait a bit to give chance to David and others to comment.

Thanks.