Patch "pinctrl: baytrail: Add missing spinlock usage in byt_gpio_irq_handler" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Subsystems (3)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
pinctrl: baytrail: Add missing spinlock usage in byt_gpio_irq_handler
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
pinctrl-baytrail-add-missing-spinlock-usage-in-byt_gpio_irq_handler.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <[email protected]> know about it.
Quoted 1 line
From
cdca06e4e85974d8a3503ab15709dbbaf90d3dd1Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexander Stein <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 12:35:28 +0100
Subject: pinctrl: baytrail: Add missing spinlock usage in byt_gpio_irq_handler
From: Alexander Stein <[email protected]>
commit cdca06e4e85974d8a3503ab15709dbbaf90d3dd1 upstream.
According to VLI64 Intel Atom E3800 Specification Update (#329901) concurrent read accesses may result in returning 0xffffffff and write accesses may be dropped silently.
To workaround all accesses must be protected by locks.
--- drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-baytrail.c +2 -0
@@ -1612,7 +1612,9 @@ static void byt_gpio_irq_handler(structcontinue ; } +raw_spin_lock (&vg->lock); pending =readl (reg); +raw_spin_unlock (&vg->lock);for_each_set_bit (pin, &pending,32 ) { virq =irq_find_mapping (vg->chip.irqdomain, base + pin);generic_handle_irq (virq);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from [email protected] are
queue-4.9/pinctrl-baytrail-add-missing-spinlock-usage-in-byt_gpio_irq_handler.patch