Skip to contentSkip to conversation

dt-bindings: spi: Add sc7280 support

PATCH RESEND In review Rajesh Patil 2 participants 2 messages Sep 27, 2021

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH RESEND v10 1/1 dt-bindings: spi: Add sc7280 support

Add compatible for sc7280 SoC.

---
Change in V10:
- As per Stephen's comments,
sorted compatible names in alphabet order

Changes in V9:
- No changes

Changes in V8:
- As per Doug's comments, added "qcom,sc7280-qspi" compatible

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/qcom,spi-qcom-qspi.yaml | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/qcom,spi-qcom-qspi.yaml +4 -1
index ef5698f..09aa955 100644
@@ -21,7 +21,10 @@ allOf:
 properties:
   compatible:
     items:
-      - const: qcom,sdm845-qspi
+      - enum:
+          - qcom,sc7280-qspi
+          - qcom,sdm845-qspi
+
       - const: qcom,qspi-v1
 
   reg:
Signature · 2 lines
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member 
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
maintainer
#1 lore raw
Quoted 3 lines · Rajesh Patil

Add compatible for sc7280 SoC.

Applied to

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] dt-bindings: spi: Add sc7280 support

      commit: eca17cbabd0cd52d32949b5ae27a4b3344e87781

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark