selftests/bpf: Replaces CHECK macros and adds malloc failure checks to bpf_iter
Subsystems (3)
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
v3 cover selftests/bpf: Replaces CHECK macros and adds malloc failure checks to bpf_iter
This patch series contains the following updates:
- Replaces the usage of all the CHECK macros in bpf_iter to the appropriate ASSERT_* macro calls
- Adds appropriate malloc failure checks to bpf_iter
Changes in v3:
- Modified and removed unnecessary if statements as suggested by Kui-Feng [1]
Changes in v2:
- Removed unused "duration" variable which caused compilation error as reported by Yonghong Song [2]
- Improved malloc failure handling as suggested by Kui-Feng Lee [3]
- Ensured propper patch formatting (i.e. sending it as a set instead of two distinct patches)
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Previous versions:
v2 - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/DB3PR10MB6835598B901975BEAEBA8601E8DDA@DB3PR10MB6835.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
- https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/DB3PR10MB68352B683F26EE9C342B71A9E8DDA@DB3PR10MB6835.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
v1 - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/DB3PR10MB683589A5F705C6CA5BE0D325E8DFA@DB3PR10MB6835.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
- https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/DB3PR10MB68356D7CDF6005480BE5876CE8DEA@DB3PR10MB6835.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Yuran Pereira (2):
selftests/bpf: Convert CHECK macros to ASSERT_* macros in bpf_iter selftests/bpf: Add malloc failure checks in bpf_iter
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 85 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
PATCH v3 1/2 selftests/bpf: Convert CHECK macros to ASSERT_* macros in bpf_iter
In reply to a message not in the archiveAs it was pointed out by Yonghong Song [1], in the bpf selftests the use of the ASSERT_* series of macros is preferred over the CHECK macro. This patch replaces all CHECK calls in bpf_iter with the appropriate ASSERT_* macros.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
--- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 79 ++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c +35 -44
@@ -34,8 +34,6 @@#include "bpf_iter_ksym.skel.h" #include "bpf_iter_sockmap.skel.h" -static int duration; -static void test_btf_id_or_null (void ) {struct bpf_iter_test_kern3 *skel;
@@ -64,7 +62,7 @@ static void do_dummy_read_opts(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_iter_attach_/* not check contents, but ensure read() ends without error */ while ((len =read (iter_fd, buf,sizeof (buf))) >0 ) ; -CHECK (len <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno)); +ASSERT_GE (len,0 ,"read" );close (iter_fd);
@@ -413,7 +411,7 @@ static int do_btf_read(struct bpf_iter_task_btf *skel) goto free_link; } -if (CHECK (err <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (err,0 ,"read" )) goto free_link; ASSERT_HAS_SUBSTR(taskbuf, "(struct task_struct)",
@@ -526,11 +524,11 @@ static int do_read_with_fd(int iter_fd, const char *expected, start =0 ;while ((len =read (iter_fd, buf + start, read_buf_len)) >0 ) { start += len; -if (CHECK (start >=16 ,"read" ,"read len %d\n" , len)) +if (!ASSERT_LT (start,16 ,"read" ))return -1 ; read_buf_len = read_one_char ?1 :16 - start; } -if (CHECK (len <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (len,0 ,"read" ))return -1 ;if (!ASSERT_STREQ (buf, expected,"read" ))
@@ -571,8 +569,7 @@ static int do_read(const char *path, const char *expected)int err, iter_fd; iter_fd =open (path,O_RDONLY ); -if (CHECK (iter_fd <0 ,"open" ,"open %s failed: %s\n" , - path,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (iter_fd,0 ,"open" ))return -1 ; err =do_read_with_fd (iter_fd, expected, false);
@@ -600,7 +597,7 @@ static void test_file_iter(void)unlink (path); err =bpf_link__pin (link, path); -if (CHECK (err,"pin_iter" ,"pin_iter to %s failed: %d\n" , path, err)) +if (!ASSERT_OK (err,"pin_iter" )) goto free_link; err =do_read (path,"abcd" );
@@ -651,12 +648,10 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)* overflow and needs restart. */ map1_fd =bpf_map_create (BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY ,NULL ,4 ,8 ,1 ,NULL ); -if (CHECK (map1_fd <0 ,"bpf_map_create" , -"map_creation failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (map1_fd,0 ,"bpf_map_create" )) goto out; map2_fd =bpf_map_create (BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY ,NULL ,4 ,8 ,1 ,NULL ); -if (CHECK (map2_fd <0 ,"bpf_map_create" , -"map_creation failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (map2_fd,0 ,"bpf_map_create" )) goto free_map1;/* bpf_seq_printf kernel buffer is 8 pages, so one map
@@ -685,14 +680,12 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)/* setup filtering map_id in bpf program */ map_info_len =sizeof (map_info); err =bpf_map_get_info_by_fd (map1_fd, &map_info, &map_info_len); -if (CHECK (err,"get_map_info" ,"get map info failed: %s\n" , -strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_OK (err,"get_map_info" )) goto free_map2; skel->bss->map1_id = map_info.id; err =bpf_map_get_info_by_fd (map2_fd, &map_info, &map_info_len); -if (CHECK (err,"get_map_info" ,"get map info failed: %s\n" , -strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_OK (err,"get_map_info" )) goto free_map2; skel->bss->map2_id = map_info.id;
@@ -714,16 +707,14 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)while ((len =read (iter_fd, buf, expected_read_len)) >0 ) total_read_len += len; -CHECK (len !=-1 || errno !=E2BIG ,"read" , -"expected ret -1, errno E2BIG, but get ret %d, error %s\n" , - len,strerror (errno)); +ASSERT_EQ (len,-1 ,"read" ); +ASSERT_EQ (errno,E2BIG ,"read" ); goto free_buf; }else if (!ret1) {while ((len =read (iter_fd, buf, expected_read_len)) >0 ) total_read_len += len; -if (CHECK (len <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" , -strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (len,0 ,"read" )) goto free_buf; }else { do {
@@ -732,8 +723,7 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1) total_read_len += len; }while (len >0 || len == -EAGAIN ); -if (CHECK (len <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" , -strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (len,0 ,"read" )) goto free_buf; }
@@ -836,7 +826,7 @@ static void test_bpf_hash_map(void)/* do some tests */ while ((len =read (iter_fd, buf,sizeof (buf))) >0 ) ; -if (CHECK (len <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (len,0 ,"read" )) goto close_iter;/* test results */
@@ -917,7 +907,7 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_hash_map(void)/* do some tests */ while ((len =read (iter_fd, buf,sizeof (buf))) >0 ) ; -if (CHECK (len <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (len,0 ,"read" )) goto close_iter;/* test results */
@@ -983,17 +973,14 @@ static void test_bpf_array_map(void) start =0 ;while ((len =read (iter_fd, buf + start,sizeof (buf) - start)) >0 ) start += len; -if (CHECK (len <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (len,0 ,"read" )) goto close_iter;/* test results */ res_first_key = *(__u32 *)buf; res_first_val = *(__u64 *)(buf +sizeof (__u32)); -if (CHECK (res_first_key !=0 || res_first_val != first_val, -"bpf_seq_write" , -"seq_write failure: first key %u vs expected 0, " -" first value %llu vs expected %llu\n" , - res_first_key, res_first_val, first_val)) +if (!ASSERT_EQ (res_first_key,0 ,"bpf_seq_write" ) || + !ASSERT_EQ (res_first_val, first_val,"bpf_seq_write" )) goto close_iter;if (!ASSERT_EQ (skel->bss->key_sum, expected_key,"key_sum" ))
@@ -1092,7 +1079,7 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_array_map(void)/* do some tests */ while ((len =read (iter_fd, buf,sizeof (buf))) >0 ) ; -if (CHECK (len <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (len,0 ,"read" )) goto close_iter;/* test results */
@@ -1131,6 +1118,7 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_delete(void) sock_fd =socket (AF_INET6 ,SOCK_STREAM ,0 );if (!ASSERT_GE (sock_fd,0 ,"socket" )) goto out; + err =bpf_map_update_elem (map_fd, &sock_fd, &val,BPF_NOEXIST );if (!ASSERT_OK (err,"map_update" )) goto out;
@@ -1151,14 +1139,19 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_delete(void)/* do some tests */ while ((len =read (iter_fd, buf,sizeof (buf))) >0 ) ; -if (CHECK (len <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (len,0 ,"read" )) goto close_iter;/* test results */ err =bpf_map_lookup_elem (map_fd, &sock_fd, &val); -if (CHECK (!err || errno !=ENOENT ,"bpf_map_lookup_elem" , -"map value wasn't deleted (err=%d, errno=%d)\n" , err, errno)) - goto close_iter; + +/* Note: The following assertions serve to ensure +* the value was deleted. It does so by asserting +* that bpf_map_lookup_elem has failed. This might +* seem counterintuitive at first. +*/ +ASSERT_ERR (err,"bpf_map_lookup_elem" ); +ASSERT_EQ (errno,ENOENT ,"bpf_map_lookup_elem" ); close_iter:close (iter_fd);
@@ -1203,17 +1196,15 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_get(void)do_dummy_read (skel->progs.fill_socket_owner); err =bpf_map_lookup_elem (map_fd, &sock_fd, &val); -if (CHECK (err || val !=getpid (),"bpf_map_lookup_elem" , -"map value wasn't set correctly (expected %d, got %d, err=%d)\n" , -getpid (), val, err)) +if (!ASSERT_OK (err,"bpf_map_lookup_elem" ) || + !ASSERT_EQ (val,getpid (),"bpf_map_lookup_elem" )) goto close_socket;do_dummy_read (skel->progs.negate_socket_local_storage); err =bpf_map_lookup_elem (map_fd, &sock_fd, &val); -CHECK (err || val != -getpid (),"bpf_map_lookup_elem" , -"map value wasn't set correctly (expected %d, got %d, err=%d)\n" , - -getpid (), val, err); +ASSERT_OK (err,"bpf_map_lookup_elem" ); +ASSERT_EQ (val, -getpid (),"bpf_map_lookup_elem" ); close_socket:close (sock_fd);
@@ -1290,7 +1281,7 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_map(void)/* do some tests */ while ((len =read (iter_fd, buf,sizeof (buf))) >0 ) ; -if (CHECK (len <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (len,0 ,"read" )) goto close_iter;/* test results */
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] selftests/bpf: Convert CHECK macros to ASSERT_* macros in bpf_iter
Quoted 9 lines · Yuran Pereira
As it was pointed out by Yonghong Song [1], in the bpf selftests the use of the ASSERT_* series of macros is preferred over the CHECK macro. This patch replaces all CHECK calls in
bpf_iterwith the appropriate ASSERT_* macros.[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Suggested-by Yonghong Song <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Yuran Pereira <[email protected]>
Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] selftests/bpf: Convert CHECK macros to ASSERT_* macros in bpf_iter
In reply to Yuran PereiraQuoted 250 lines · Yuran Pereira
As it was pointed out by Yonghong Song [1], in the bpf selftests the use of the ASSERT_* series of macros is preferred over the CHECK macro. This patch replaces all CHECK calls in
bpf_iterwith the appropriate ASSERT_* macros.[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
Suggested-by Yonghong Song <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Yuran Pereira <[email protected]>--- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 79 ++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c +35
-44@@ -34,8 +34,6 @@#include "bpf_iter_ksym.skel.h" #include "bpf_iter_sockmap.skel.h" -static int duration; -static void test_btf_id_or_null (void ) {struct bpf_iter_test_kern3 *skel;@@ -64,7 +62,7 @@ static void do_dummy_read_opts(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_iter_attach_/* not check contents, but ensure read() ends without error */ while ((len =read (iter_fd, buf,sizeof (buf))) >0 ) ; -CHECK (len <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno)); +ASSERT_GE (len,0 ,"read" );close (iter_fd);@@ -413,7 +411,7 @@ static int do_btf_read(struct bpf_iter_task_btf *skel) goto free_link; } -if (CHECK (err <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (err,0 ,"read" )) goto free_link; ASSERT_HAS_SUBSTR(taskbuf, "(struct task_struct)",@@ -526,11 +524,11 @@ static int do_read_with_fd(int iter_fd, const char *expected, start =0 ;while ((len =read (iter_fd, buf + start, read_buf_len)) >0 ) { start += len; -if (CHECK (start >=16 ,"read" ,"read len %d\n" , len)) +if (!ASSERT_LT (start,16 ,"read" ))return -1 ; read_buf_len = read_one_char ?1 :16 - start; } -if (CHECK (len <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (len,0 ,"read" ))return -1 ;if (!ASSERT_STREQ (buf, expected,"read" ))@@ -571,8 +569,7 @@ static int do_read(const char *path, const char *expected)int err, iter_fd; iter_fd =open (path,O_RDONLY ); -if (CHECK (iter_fd <0 ,"open" ,"open %s failed: %s\n" , - path,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (iter_fd,0 ,"open" ))return -1 ; err =do_read_with_fd (iter_fd, expected, false);@@ -600,7 +597,7 @@ static void test_file_iter(void)unlink (path); err =bpf_link__pin (link, path); -if (CHECK (err,"pin_iter" ,"pin_iter to %s failed: %d\n" , path, err)) +if (!ASSERT_OK (err,"pin_iter" )) goto free_link; err =do_read (path,"abcd" );@@ -651,12 +648,10 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)* overflow and needs restart. */ map1_fd =bpf_map_create (BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY ,NULL ,4 ,8 ,1 ,NULL ); -if (CHECK (map1_fd <0 ,"bpf_map_create" , -"map_creation failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (map1_fd,0 ,"bpf_map_create" )) goto out; map2_fd =bpf_map_create (BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY ,NULL ,4 ,8 ,1 ,NULL ); -if (CHECK (map2_fd <0 ,"bpf_map_create" , -"map_creation failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (map2_fd,0 ,"bpf_map_create" )) goto free_map1;/* bpf_seq_printf kernel buffer is 8 pages, so one map @@ -685,14 +680,12 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)/* setup filtering map_id in bpf program */ map_info_len =sizeof (map_info); err =bpf_map_get_info_by_fd (map1_fd, &map_info, &map_info_len); -if (CHECK (err,"get_map_info" ,"get map info failed: %s\n" , -strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_OK (err,"get_map_info" )) goto free_map2; skel->bss->map1_id = map_info.id; err =bpf_map_get_info_by_fd (map2_fd, &map_info, &map_info_len); -if (CHECK (err,"get_map_info" ,"get map info failed: %s\n" , -strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_OK (err,"get_map_info" )) goto free_map2; skel->bss->map2_id = map_info.id;@@ -714,16 +707,14 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)while ((len =read (iter_fd, buf, expected_read_len)) >0 ) total_read_len += len; -CHECK (len !=-1 || errno !=E2BIG ,"read" , -"expected ret -1, errno E2BIG, but get ret %d, error %s\n" , - len,strerror (errno)); +ASSERT_EQ (len,-1 ,"read" ); +ASSERT_EQ (errno,E2BIG ,"read" ); goto free_buf; }else if (!ret1) {while ((len =read (iter_fd, buf, expected_read_len)) >0 ) total_read_len += len; -if (CHECK (len <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" , -strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (len,0 ,"read" )) goto free_buf; }else { do {@@ -732,8 +723,7 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1) total_read_len += len; }while (len >0 || len == -EAGAIN ); -if (CHECK (len <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" , -strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (len,0 ,"read" )) goto free_buf; }@@ -836,7 +826,7 @@ static void test_bpf_hash_map(void)/* do some tests */ while ((len =read (iter_fd, buf,sizeof (buf))) >0 ) ; -if (CHECK (len <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (len,0 ,"read" )) goto close_iter;/* test results */ @@ -917,7 +907,7 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_hash_map(void)/* do some tests */ while ((len =read (iter_fd, buf,sizeof (buf))) >0 ) ; -if (CHECK (len <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (len,0 ,"read" )) goto close_iter;/* test results */ @@ -983,17 +973,14 @@ static void test_bpf_array_map(void) start =0 ;while ((len =read (iter_fd, buf + start,sizeof (buf) - start)) >0 ) start += len; -if (CHECK (len <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (len,0 ,"read" )) goto close_iter;/* test results */ res_first_key = *(__u32 *)buf; res_first_val = *(__u64 *)(buf +sizeof (__u32)); -if (CHECK (res_first_key !=0 || res_first_val != first_val, -"bpf_seq_write" , -"seq_write failure: first key %u vs expected 0, " -" first value %llu vs expected %llu\n" , - res_first_key, res_first_val, first_val)) +if (!ASSERT_EQ (res_first_key,0 ,"bpf_seq_write" ) || + !ASSERT_EQ (res_first_val, first_val,"bpf_seq_write" )) goto close_iter;if (!ASSERT_EQ (skel->bss->key_sum, expected_key,"key_sum" ))@@ -1092,7 +1079,7 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_array_map(void)/* do some tests */ while ((len =read (iter_fd, buf,sizeof (buf))) >0 ) ; -if (CHECK (len <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (len,0 ,"read" )) goto close_iter;/* test results */ @@ -1131,6 +1118,7 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_delete(void) sock_fd =socket (AF_INET6 ,SOCK_STREAM ,0 );if (!ASSERT_GE (sock_fd,0 ,"socket" )) goto out; + err =bpf_map_update_elem (map_fd, &sock_fd, &val,BPF_NOEXIST );if (!ASSERT_OK (err,"map_update" )) goto out;@@ -1151,14 +1139,19 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_delete(void)/* do some tests */ while ((len =read (iter_fd, buf,sizeof (buf))) >0 ) ; -if (CHECK (len <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (len,0 ,"read" )) goto close_iter;/* test results */ err =bpf_map_lookup_elem (map_fd, &sock_fd, &val); -if (CHECK (!err || errno !=ENOENT ,"bpf_map_lookup_elem" , -"map value wasn't deleted (err=%d, errno=%d)\n" , err, errno)) - goto close_iter; + +/* Note: The following assertions serve to ensure +* the value was deleted. It does so by asserting +* that bpf_map_lookup_elem has failed. This might +* seem counterintuitive at first. +*/ +ASSERT_ERR (err,"bpf_map_lookup_elem" ); +ASSERT_EQ (errno,ENOENT ,"bpf_map_lookup_elem" ); close_iter:close (iter_fd);@@ -1203,17 +1196,15 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_get(void)do_dummy_read (skel->progs.fill_socket_owner); err =bpf_map_lookup_elem (map_fd, &sock_fd, &val); -if (CHECK (err || val !=getpid (),"bpf_map_lookup_elem" , -"map value wasn't set correctly (expected %d, got %d, err=%d)\n" , -getpid (), val, err)) +if (!ASSERT_OK (err,"bpf_map_lookup_elem" ) || + !ASSERT_EQ (val,getpid (),"bpf_map_lookup_elem" )) goto close_socket;do_dummy_read (skel->progs.negate_socket_local_storage); err =bpf_map_lookup_elem (map_fd, &sock_fd, &val); -CHECK (err || val != -getpid (),"bpf_map_lookup_elem" , -"map value wasn't set correctly (expected %d, got %d, err=%d)\n" , - -getpid (), val, err); +ASSERT_OK (err,"bpf_map_lookup_elem" ); +ASSERT_EQ (val, -getpid (),"bpf_map_lookup_elem" ); close_socket:close (sock_fd);@@ -1290,7 +1281,7 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_map(void)/* do some tests */ while ((len =read (iter_fd, buf,sizeof (buf))) >0 ) ; -if (CHECK (len <0 ,"read" ,"read failed: %s\n" ,strerror (errno))) +if (!ASSERT_GE (len,0 ,"read" )) goto close_iter;/* test results */
Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] selftests/bpf: Convert CHECK macros to ASSERT_* macros in bpf_iter
In reply to Yuran PereiraThis series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>:
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>:
Quoted 8 lines · On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 10:54:13 +0530 you wrote:
As it was pointed out by Yonghong Song [1], in the bpf selftests the use of the ASSERT_* series of macros is preferred over the CHECK macro. This patch replaces all CHECK calls in
bpf_iterwith the appropriate ASSERT_* macros.[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]
[...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v3,1/2] selftests/bpf: Convert CHECK macros to ASSERT_* macros in bpf_iter
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/ed47cb27586d - [bpf-next,v3,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add malloc failure checks in bpf_iter https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/cb3c6a58be50
You are awesome, thank you!
Signature · 2 lines
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
PATCH v3 2/2 selftests/bpf: Add malloc failure checks in bpf_iter
In reply to a message not in the archiveSince some malloc calls in bpf_iter may at times fail, this patch adds the appropriate fail checks, and ensures that any previously allocated resource is appropriately destroyed before returning the function.
--- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c +5 -1
@@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1) goto free_link; buf =malloc (expected_read_len); -if (!buf) +if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR (buf,"malloc" )) goto close_iter;/* do read */
@@ -868,6 +868,8 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_hash_map(void) skel->rodata->num_cpus =bpf_num_possible_cpus (); val =malloc (8 *bpf_num_possible_cpus ()); +if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR (val,"malloc" )) + goto out; err =bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_hash_map__load (skel);if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR (skel,"bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_hash_map__load" ))
@@ -1044,6 +1046,8 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_array_map(void) skel->rodata->num_cpus =bpf_num_possible_cpus (); val =malloc (8 *bpf_num_possible_cpus ()); +if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR (val,"malloc" )) + goto out; err =bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_array_map__load (skel);if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR (skel,"bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_array_map__load" ))
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add malloc failure checks in bpf_iter
Quoted 6 lines · Yuran Pereira
Since some malloc calls in
bpf_itermay at times fail, this patch adds the appropriate fail checks, and ensures that any previously allocated resource is appropriately destroyed before returning the function.Signed-off-by Yuran Pereira <[email protected]>
Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add malloc failure checks in bpf_iter
In reply to Yuran PereiraQuoted 41 lines · Yuran Pereira
Since some malloc calls in
bpf_itermay at times fail, this patch adds the appropriate fail checks, and ensures that any previously allocated resource is appropriately destroyed before returning the function.Signed-off-by Yuran Pereira <[email protected]>--- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c +5
-1@@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1) goto free_link; buf =malloc (expected_read_len); -if (!buf) +if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR (buf,"malloc" )) goto close_iter;/* do read */ @@ -868,6 +868,8 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_hash_map(void) skel->rodata->num_cpus =bpf_num_possible_cpus (); val =malloc (8 *bpf_num_possible_cpus ()); +if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR (val,"malloc" )) + goto out; err =bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_hash_map__load (skel);if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR (skel,"bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_hash_map__load" ))@@ -1044,6 +1046,8 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_array_map(void) skel->rodata->num_cpus =bpf_num_possible_cpus (); val =malloc (8 *bpf_num_possible_cpus ()); +if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR (val,"malloc" )) + goto out; err =bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_array_map__load (skel);if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR (skel,"bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_array_map__load" ))