Skip to contentSkip to conversation

selftests/bpf: Replaces CHECK macros and adds malloc failure checks to bpf_iter

PATCH Applied Yuran Pereira 4 participants 8 messages Oct 28, 2023 – Nov 2, 2023 1 message not in the archive

Subsystems (3)
lore
Share & tools
lore

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#1 lore raw

v3 cover selftests/bpf: Replaces CHECK macros and adds malloc failure checks to bpf_iter

This patch series contains the following updates:
- Replaces the usage of all the CHECK macros in bpf_iter to the appropriate ASSERT_* macro calls
- Adds appropriate malloc failure checks to bpf_iter

Changes in v3:
- Modified and removed unnecessary if statements as suggested by Kui-Feng [1]

Changes in v2:
- Removed unused "duration" variable which caused compilation error as reported by Yonghong Song [2]
- Improved malloc failure handling as suggested by Kui-Feng Lee [3]
- Ensured propper patch formatting (i.e. sending it as a set instead of two distinct patches)

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]

Previous versions:
v2 - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/DB3PR10MB6835598B901975BEAEBA8601E8DDA@DB3PR10MB6835.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
- https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/DB3PR10MB68352B683F26EE9C342B71A9E8DDA@DB3PR10MB6835.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM

v1 - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/DB3PR10MB683589A5F705C6CA5BE0D325E8DFA@DB3PR10MB6835.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
- https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/DB3PR10MB68356D7CDF6005480BE5876CE8DEA@DB3PR10MB6835.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM

Yuran Pereira (2):
selftests/bpf: Convert CHECK macros to ASSERT_* macros in bpf_iter selftests/bpf: Add malloc failure checks in bpf_iter

 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c       | 85 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
#2 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/2 selftests/bpf: Convert CHECK macros to ASSERT_* macros in bpf_iter

In reply to a message not in the archive

As it was pointed out by Yonghong Song [1], in the bpf selftests the use of the ASSERT_* series of macros is preferred over the CHECK macro. This patch replaces all CHECK calls in bpf_iter with the appropriate ASSERT_* macros.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]

---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c       | 79 ++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c +35 -44
index 1f02168103dd..123a3502b8f0 100644
@@ -34,8 +34,6 @@
 #include "bpf_iter_ksym.skel.h"
 #include "bpf_iter_sockmap.skel.h"
 
-static int duration;
-
 static void test_btf_id_or_null(void)
 {
 	struct bpf_iter_test_kern3 *skel;
@@ -64,7 +62,7 @@ static void do_dummy_read_opts(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_iter_attach_
 	/* not check contents, but ensure read() ends without error */
 	while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
 		;
-	CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
+	ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read");
 
 	close(iter_fd);
 
@@ -413,7 +411,7 @@ static int do_btf_read(struct bpf_iter_task_btf *skel)
 		goto free_link;
 	}
 
-	if (CHECK(err < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(err, 0, "read"))
 		goto free_link;
 
 	ASSERT_HAS_SUBSTR(taskbuf, "(struct task_struct)",
@@ -526,11 +524,11 @@ static int do_read_with_fd(int iter_fd, const char *expected,
 	start = 0;
 	while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf + start, read_buf_len)) > 0) {
 		start += len;
-		if (CHECK(start >= 16, "read", "read len %d\n", len))
+		if (!ASSERT_LT(start, 16, "read"))
 			return -1;
 		read_buf_len = read_one_char ? 1 : 16 - start;
 	}
-	if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
 		return -1;
 
 	if (!ASSERT_STREQ(buf, expected, "read"))
@@ -571,8 +569,7 @@ static int do_read(const char *path, const char *expected)
 	int err, iter_fd;
 
 	iter_fd = open(path, O_RDONLY);
-	if (CHECK(iter_fd < 0, "open", "open %s failed: %s\n",
-		  path, strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(iter_fd, 0, "open"))
 		return -1;
 
 	err = do_read_with_fd(iter_fd, expected, false);
@@ -600,7 +597,7 @@ static void test_file_iter(void)
 	unlink(path);
 
 	err = bpf_link__pin(link, path);
-	if (CHECK(err, "pin_iter", "pin_iter to %s failed: %d\n", path, err))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "pin_iter"))
 		goto free_link;
 
 	err = do_read(path, "abcd");
@@ -651,12 +648,10 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
 	 * overflow and needs restart.
 	 */
 	map1_fd = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, NULL, 4, 8, 1, NULL);
-	if (CHECK(map1_fd < 0, "bpf_map_create",
-		  "map_creation failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(map1_fd, 0, "bpf_map_create"))
 		goto out;
 	map2_fd = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, NULL, 4, 8, 1, NULL);
-	if (CHECK(map2_fd < 0, "bpf_map_create",
-		  "map_creation failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(map2_fd, 0, "bpf_map_create"))
 		goto free_map1;
 
 	/* bpf_seq_printf kernel buffer is 8 pages, so one map
@@ -685,14 +680,12 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
 	/* setup filtering map_id in bpf program */
 	map_info_len = sizeof(map_info);
 	err = bpf_map_get_info_by_fd(map1_fd, &map_info, &map_info_len);
-	if (CHECK(err, "get_map_info", "get map info failed: %s\n",
-		  strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "get_map_info"))
 		goto free_map2;
 	skel->bss->map1_id = map_info.id;
 
 	err = bpf_map_get_info_by_fd(map2_fd, &map_info, &map_info_len);
-	if (CHECK(err, "get_map_info", "get map info failed: %s\n",
-		  strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "get_map_info"))
 		goto free_map2;
 	skel->bss->map2_id = map_info.id;
 
@@ -714,16 +707,14 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
 		while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, expected_read_len)) > 0)
 			total_read_len += len;
 
-		CHECK(len != -1 || errno != E2BIG, "read",
-		      "expected ret -1, errno E2BIG, but get ret %d, error %s\n",
-			  len, strerror(errno));
+		ASSERT_EQ(len, -1, "read");
+		ASSERT_EQ(errno, E2BIG, "read");
 		goto free_buf;
 	} else if (!ret1) {
 		while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, expected_read_len)) > 0)
 			total_read_len += len;
 
-		if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n",
-			  strerror(errno)))
+		if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
 			goto free_buf;
 	} else {
 		do {
@@ -732,8 +723,7 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
 				total_read_len += len;
 		} while (len > 0 || len == -EAGAIN);
 
-		if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n",
-			  strerror(errno)))
+		if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
 			goto free_buf;
 	}
 
@@ -836,7 +826,7 @@ static void test_bpf_hash_map(void)
 	/* do some tests */
 	while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
 		;
-	if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
 		goto close_iter;
 
 	/* test results */
@@ -917,7 +907,7 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_hash_map(void)
 	/* do some tests */
 	while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
 		;
-	if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
 		goto close_iter;
 
 	/* test results */
@@ -983,17 +973,14 @@ static void test_bpf_array_map(void)
 	start = 0;
 	while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf + start, sizeof(buf) - start)) > 0)
 		start += len;
-	if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
 		goto close_iter;
 
 	/* test results */
 	res_first_key = *(__u32 *)buf;
 	res_first_val = *(__u64 *)(buf + sizeof(__u32));
-	if (CHECK(res_first_key != 0 || res_first_val != first_val,
-		  "bpf_seq_write",
-		  "seq_write failure: first key %u vs expected 0, "
-		  " first value %llu vs expected %llu\n",
-		  res_first_key, res_first_val, first_val))
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(res_first_key, 0, "bpf_seq_write") ||
+			!ASSERT_EQ(res_first_val, first_val, "bpf_seq_write"))
 		goto close_iter;
 
 	if (!ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->key_sum, expected_key, "key_sum"))
@@ -1092,7 +1079,7 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_array_map(void)
 	/* do some tests */
 	while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
 		;
-	if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
 		goto close_iter;
 
 	/* test results */
@@ -1131,6 +1118,7 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_delete(void)
 	sock_fd = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
 	if (!ASSERT_GE(sock_fd, 0, "socket"))
 		goto out;
+
 	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &sock_fd, &val, BPF_NOEXIST);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "map_update"))
 		goto out;
@@ -1151,14 +1139,19 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_delete(void)
 	/* do some tests */
 	while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
 		;
-	if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
 		goto close_iter;
 
 	/* test results */
 	err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &sock_fd, &val);
-	if (CHECK(!err || errno != ENOENT, "bpf_map_lookup_elem",
-		  "map value wasn't deleted (err=%d, errno=%d)\n", err, errno))
-		goto close_iter;
+
+	 /* Note: The following assertions serve to ensure
+	  * the value was deleted. It does so by asserting
+	  * that bpf_map_lookup_elem has failed. This might
+	  * seem counterintuitive at first.
+	  */
+	ASSERT_ERR(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem");
+	ASSERT_EQ(errno, ENOENT, "bpf_map_lookup_elem");
 
 close_iter:
 	close(iter_fd);
@@ -1203,17 +1196,15 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_get(void)
 	do_dummy_read(skel->progs.fill_socket_owner);
 
 	err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &sock_fd, &val);
-	if (CHECK(err || val != getpid(), "bpf_map_lookup_elem",
-	    "map value wasn't set correctly (expected %d, got %d, err=%d)\n",
-	    getpid(), val, err))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem") ||
+			!ASSERT_EQ(val, getpid(), "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))
 		goto close_socket;
 
 	do_dummy_read(skel->progs.negate_socket_local_storage);
 
 	err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &sock_fd, &val);
-	CHECK(err || val != -getpid(), "bpf_map_lookup_elem",
-	      "map value wasn't set correctly (expected %d, got %d, err=%d)\n",
-	      -getpid(), val, err);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem");
+	ASSERT_EQ(val, -getpid(), "bpf_map_lookup_elem");
 
 close_socket:
 	close(sock_fd);
@@ -1290,7 +1281,7 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_map(void)
 	/* do some tests */
 	while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
 		;
-	if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
 		goto close_iter;
 
 	/* test results */
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
reviewer Acked-by on v3 1/2
#3 lore raw

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] selftests/bpf: Convert CHECK macros to ASSERT_* macros in bpf_iter

Quoted 9 lines · Yuran Pereira

As it was pointed out by Yonghong Song [1], in the bpf selftests the use of the ASSERT_* series of macros is preferred over the CHECK macro. This patch replaces all CHECK calls in bpf_iter with the appropriate ASSERT_* macros.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]

Acked-by on v3 1/2
#4 lore raw

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] selftests/bpf: Convert CHECK macros to ASSERT_* macros in bpf_iter

In reply to Yuran Pereira
Quoted 250 lines · Yuran Pereira

As it was pointed out by Yonghong Song [1], in the bpf selftests the use of the ASSERT_* series of macros is preferred over the CHECK macro. This patch replaces all CHECK calls in bpf_iter with the appropriate ASSERT_* macros.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]

---
  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c       | 79 ++++++++-----------
  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c +35 -44
index 1f02168103dd..123a3502b8f0 100644
@@ -34,8 +34,6 @@
  #include "bpf_iter_ksym.skel.h"
  #include "bpf_iter_sockmap.skel.h"
 
-static int duration;
-
  static void test_btf_id_or_null(void)
  {
  	struct bpf_iter_test_kern3 *skel;
@@ -64,7 +62,7 @@ static void do_dummy_read_opts(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_iter_attach_
  	/* not check contents, but ensure read() ends without error */
  	while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
  		;
-	CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno));
+	ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read");
 
  	close(iter_fd);
 
@@ -413,7 +411,7 @@ static int do_btf_read(struct bpf_iter_task_btf *skel)
  		goto free_link;
  	}
 
-	if (CHECK(err < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(err, 0, "read"))
  		goto free_link;
 
  	ASSERT_HAS_SUBSTR(taskbuf, "(struct task_struct)",
@@ -526,11 +524,11 @@ static int do_read_with_fd(int iter_fd, const char *expected,
  	start = 0;
  	while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf + start, read_buf_len)) > 0) {
  		start += len;
-		if (CHECK(start >= 16, "read", "read len %d\n", len))
+		if (!ASSERT_LT(start, 16, "read"))
  			return -1;
  		read_buf_len = read_one_char ? 1 : 16 - start;
  	}
-	if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
  		return -1;
 
  	if (!ASSERT_STREQ(buf, expected, "read"))
@@ -571,8 +569,7 @@ static int do_read(const char *path, const char *expected)
  	int err, iter_fd;
 
  	iter_fd = open(path, O_RDONLY);
-	if (CHECK(iter_fd < 0, "open", "open %s failed: %s\n",
-		  path, strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(iter_fd, 0, "open"))
  		return -1;
 
  	err = do_read_with_fd(iter_fd, expected, false);
@@ -600,7 +597,7 @@ static void test_file_iter(void)
  	unlink(path);
 
  	err = bpf_link__pin(link, path);
-	if (CHECK(err, "pin_iter", "pin_iter to %s failed: %d\n", path, err))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "pin_iter"))
  		goto free_link;
 
  	err = do_read(path, "abcd");
@@ -651,12 +648,10 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
  	 * overflow and needs restart.
  	 */
  	map1_fd = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, NULL, 4, 8, 1, NULL);
-	if (CHECK(map1_fd < 0, "bpf_map_create",
-		  "map_creation failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(map1_fd, 0, "bpf_map_create"))
  		goto out;
  	map2_fd = bpf_map_create(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, NULL, 4, 8, 1, NULL);
-	if (CHECK(map2_fd < 0, "bpf_map_create",
-		  "map_creation failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(map2_fd, 0, "bpf_map_create"))
  		goto free_map1;
 
  	/* bpf_seq_printf kernel buffer is 8 pages, so one map
@@ -685,14 +680,12 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
  	/* setup filtering map_id in bpf program */
  	map_info_len = sizeof(map_info);
  	err = bpf_map_get_info_by_fd(map1_fd, &map_info, &map_info_len);
-	if (CHECK(err, "get_map_info", "get map info failed: %s\n",
-		  strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "get_map_info"))
  		goto free_map2;
  	skel->bss->map1_id = map_info.id;
 
  	err = bpf_map_get_info_by_fd(map2_fd, &map_info, &map_info_len);
-	if (CHECK(err, "get_map_info", "get map info failed: %s\n",
-		  strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "get_map_info"))
  		goto free_map2;
  	skel->bss->map2_id = map_info.id;
 
@@ -714,16 +707,14 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
  		while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, expected_read_len)) > 0)
  			total_read_len += len;
 
-		CHECK(len != -1 || errno != E2BIG, "read",
-		      "expected ret -1, errno E2BIG, but get ret %d, error %s\n",
-			  len, strerror(errno));
+		ASSERT_EQ(len, -1, "read");
+		ASSERT_EQ(errno, E2BIG, "read");
  		goto free_buf;
  	} else if (!ret1) {
  		while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, expected_read_len)) > 0)
  			total_read_len += len;
 
-		if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n",
-			  strerror(errno)))
+		if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
  			goto free_buf;
  	} else {
  		do {
@@ -732,8 +723,7 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
  				total_read_len += len;
  		} while (len > 0 || len == -EAGAIN);
 
-		if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n",
-			  strerror(errno)))
+		if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
  			goto free_buf;
  	}
 
@@ -836,7 +826,7 @@ static void test_bpf_hash_map(void)
  	/* do some tests */
  	while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
  		;
-	if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
  		goto close_iter;
 
  	/* test results */
@@ -917,7 +907,7 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_hash_map(void)
  	/* do some tests */
  	while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
  		;
-	if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
  		goto close_iter;
 
  	/* test results */
@@ -983,17 +973,14 @@ static void test_bpf_array_map(void)
  	start = 0;
  	while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf + start, sizeof(buf) - start)) > 0)
  		start += len;
-	if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
  		goto close_iter;
 
  	/* test results */
  	res_first_key = *(__u32 *)buf;
  	res_first_val = *(__u64 *)(buf + sizeof(__u32));
-	if (CHECK(res_first_key != 0 || res_first_val != first_val,
-		  "bpf_seq_write",
-		  "seq_write failure: first key %u vs expected 0, "
-		  " first value %llu vs expected %llu\n",
-		  res_first_key, res_first_val, first_val))
+	if (!ASSERT_EQ(res_first_key, 0, "bpf_seq_write") ||
+			!ASSERT_EQ(res_first_val, first_val, "bpf_seq_write"))
  		goto close_iter;
 
  	if (!ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->key_sum, expected_key, "key_sum"))
@@ -1092,7 +1079,7 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_array_map(void)
  	/* do some tests */
  	while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
  		;
-	if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
  		goto close_iter;
 
  	/* test results */
@@ -1131,6 +1118,7 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_delete(void)
  	sock_fd = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
  	if (!ASSERT_GE(sock_fd, 0, "socket"))
  		goto out;
+
  	err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &sock_fd, &val, BPF_NOEXIST);
  	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "map_update"))
  		goto out;
@@ -1151,14 +1139,19 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_delete(void)
  	/* do some tests */
  	while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
  		;
-	if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
  		goto close_iter;
 
  	/* test results */
  	err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &sock_fd, &val);
-	if (CHECK(!err || errno != ENOENT, "bpf_map_lookup_elem",
-		  "map value wasn't deleted (err=%d, errno=%d)\n", err, errno))
-		goto close_iter;
+
+	 /* Note: The following assertions serve to ensure
+	  * the value was deleted. It does so by asserting
+	  * that bpf_map_lookup_elem has failed. This might
+	  * seem counterintuitive at first.
+	  */
+	ASSERT_ERR(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem");
+	ASSERT_EQ(errno, ENOENT, "bpf_map_lookup_elem");
 
  close_iter:
  	close(iter_fd);
@@ -1203,17 +1196,15 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_get(void)
  	do_dummy_read(skel->progs.fill_socket_owner);
 
  	err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &sock_fd, &val);
-	if (CHECK(err || val != getpid(), "bpf_map_lookup_elem",
-	    "map value wasn't set correctly (expected %d, got %d, err=%d)\n",
-	    getpid(), val, err))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem") ||
+			!ASSERT_EQ(val, getpid(), "bpf_map_lookup_elem"))
  		goto close_socket;
 
  	do_dummy_read(skel->progs.negate_socket_local_storage);
 
  	err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(map_fd, &sock_fd, &val);
-	CHECK(err || val != -getpid(), "bpf_map_lookup_elem",
-	      "map value wasn't set correctly (expected %d, got %d, err=%d)\n",
-	      -getpid(), val, err);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_map_lookup_elem");
+	ASSERT_EQ(val, -getpid(), "bpf_map_lookup_elem");
 
  close_socket:
  	close(sock_fd);
@@ -1290,7 +1281,7 @@ static void test_bpf_sk_storage_map(void)
  	/* do some tests */
  	while ((len = read(iter_fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
  		;
-	if (CHECK(len < 0, "read", "read failed: %s\n", strerror(errno)))
+	if (!ASSERT_GE(len, 0, "read"))
  		goto close_iter;
 
  	/* test results */
#5 lore raw

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] selftests/bpf: Convert CHECK macros to ASSERT_* macros in bpf_iter

In reply to Yuran Pereira
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>:

Hello:

This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>:

Quoted 8 lines · On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 10:54:13 +0530 you wrote:

As it was pointed out by Yonghong Song [1], in the bpf selftests the use of the ASSERT_* series of macros is preferred over the CHECK macro. This patch replaces all CHECK calls in bpf_iter with the appropriate ASSERT_* macros.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]

[...]

Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,v3,1/2] selftests/bpf: Convert CHECK macros to ASSERT_* macros in bpf_iter

    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/ed47cb27586d
  - [bpf-next,v3,2/2] selftests/bpf: Add malloc failure checks in bpf_iter
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/cb3c6a58be50

You are awesome, thank you!

Signature · 2 lines
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
#6 lore raw

PATCH v3 2/2 selftests/bpf: Add malloc failure checks in bpf_iter

In reply to a message not in the archive

Since some malloc calls in bpf_iter may at times fail, this patch adds the appropriate fail checks, and ensures that any previously allocated resource is appropriately destroyed before returning the function.

---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c +5 -1
index 123a3502b8f0..1e02d1ba1c18 100644
@@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
 		goto free_link;
 
 	buf = malloc(expected_read_len);
-	if (!buf)
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(buf, "malloc"))
 		goto close_iter;
 
 	/* do read */
@@ -868,6 +868,8 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_hash_map(void)
 
 	skel->rodata->num_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus();
 	val = malloc(8 * bpf_num_possible_cpus());
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(val, "malloc"))
+		goto out;
 
 	err = bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_hash_map__load(skel);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_hash_map__load"))
@@ -1044,6 +1046,8 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_array_map(void)
 
 	skel->rodata->num_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus();
 	val = malloc(8 * bpf_num_possible_cpus());
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(val, "malloc"))
+		goto out;
 
 	err = bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_array_map__load(skel);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_array_map__load"))
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
reviewer Acked-by on v3 2/2
#7 lore raw

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add malloc failure checks in bpf_iter

Quoted 6 lines · Yuran Pereira

Since some malloc calls in bpf_iter may at times fail, this patch adds the appropriate fail checks, and ensures that any previously allocated resource is appropriately destroyed before returning the function.

Acked-by on v3 2/2
#8 lore raw

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add malloc failure checks in bpf_iter

In reply to Yuran Pereira
Quoted 41 lines · Yuran Pereira

Since some malloc calls in bpf_iter may at times fail, this patch adds the appropriate fail checks, and ensures that any previously allocated resource is appropriately destroyed before returning the function.

---
  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 6 +++++-
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c +5 -1
index 123a3502b8f0..1e02d1ba1c18 100644
@@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
  		goto free_link;
 
  	buf = malloc(expected_read_len);
-	if (!buf)
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(buf, "malloc"))
  		goto close_iter;
 
  	/* do read */
@@ -868,6 +868,8 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_hash_map(void)
 
  	skel->rodata->num_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus();
  	val = malloc(8 * bpf_num_possible_cpus());
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(val, "malloc"))
+		goto out;
 
  	err = bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_hash_map__load(skel);
  	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_hash_map__load"))
@@ -1044,6 +1046,8 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_array_map(void)
 
  	skel->rodata->num_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus();
  	val = malloc(8 * bpf_num_possible_cpus());
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(val, "malloc"))
+		goto out;
 
  	err = bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_array_map__load(skel);
  	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_array_map__load"))