[2.6][TRIVIAL][SPELLING] OTHO->OTOH
PATCH 1/1 [2.6][TRIVIAL][SPELLING] OTHO->OTOH
I spent twenty obscene seconds attempting to expand "OTHO". All of my proposals are unpublishable, so here's a trivial patch.
-Bryan
mm/slab.c 2004-01-07 00:23:17.211879768 -0800 renamed from mm/slab.c.orig 2004-01-07 00:22:47.690367720 -0800 +1 -1
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ /* Optimization question: fewer reaps means less * probability for unnessary cpucache drain/refill cycles. * - * OTHO the cpuarrays can contain lots of objects, + * OTOH the cpuarrays can contain lots of objects, * which could lock up otherwise freeable slabs. */ #define REAPTIMEOUT_CPUC (2*HZ)
In message <[email protected]> you write:
Quoted 2 lines
- * OTHO the cpuarrays can contain lots of objects,
+ * OTOH the cpuarrays can contain lots of objects,
Comes under the "too trivial" rule for the Trivial Patch Monkey.
For clarification:
1) It's not a spelling mistake in documentation, or any message a user will see.
2) It's not likely to cause someone to miss a grep (such as a misspelled function name in a comment would).
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.