Skip to contentSkip to conversation

[2.6][TRIVIAL][SPELLING] OTHO->OTOH

PATCH In review Bryan Rittmeyer 2 participants 2 messages Jan 7, 2004 – Jan 8, 2004 Memory management

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 [2.6][TRIVIAL][SPELLING] OTHO->OTOH

I spent twenty obscene seconds attempting to expand "OTHO". All of my proposals are unpublishable, so here's a trivial patch.

-Bryan

mm/slab.c 2004-01-07 00:23:17.211879768 -0800 renamed from mm/slab.c.orig 2004-01-07 00:22:47.690367720 -0800 +1 -1
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@
 /* Optimization question: fewer reaps means less 
  * probability for unnessary cpucache drain/refill cycles.
  *
- * OTHO the cpuarrays can contain lots of objects,
+ * OTOH the cpuarrays can contain lots of objects,
  * which could lock up otherwise freeable slabs.
  */
 #define REAPTIMEOUT_CPUC       (2*HZ)
#1 lore raw

In message <[email protected]> you write:

Quoted 2 lines

- * OTHO the cpuarrays can contain lots of objects,
+ * OTOH the cpuarrays can contain lots of objects,

Comes under the "too trivial" rule for the Trivial Patch Monkey.

For clarification:

1) It's not a spelling mistake in documentation, or any message a user will see.

2) It's not likely to cause someone to miss a grep (such as a misspelled function name in a comment would).

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.