Fix sparc TIF_USEDFPU flag atomicity
PATCH 1/1 Fix sparc TIF_USEDFPU flag atomicity
Fix sparc TIF_USEDFPU flag atomicity
Non atomic update of TIF can be very dangerous, except at thread structure creation time. Here I standardize the TIF_USEDFPU usage of the sparc arch. This fix addresses the issue with *_ti_thread_flag().
Applies on 2.6.20.
arch/sparc/kernel/process.c +9 -8
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ void exit_thread(void)#ifndef CONFIG_SMP if (last_task_used_math = current) {#else -if (current_thread_info ()->flags & _TIF_USEDFPU) { +if (test_ti_thread_flag (current_thread_info (),TIF_USEDFPU )) {#endif /* Keep process from leaving FPU in a bogon state. */ put_psr (get_psr () |PSR_EF );
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ void exit_thread(void)#ifndef CONFIG_SMP last_task_used_math =NULL ;#else -current_thread_info ()->flags &= ~_TIF_USEDFPU; +clear_ti_thread_flag (current_thread_info (),TIF_USEDFPU );#endif } }
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ void flush_thread(void)#ifndef CONFIG_SMP if (last_task_used_math = current) {#else -if (current_thread_info ()->flags & _TIF_USEDFPU) { +if (test_ti_thread_flag (current_thread_info (),TIF_USEDFPU )) {#endif /* Clean the fpu. */ put_psr (get_psr () |PSR_EF );
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ void flush_thread(void)#ifndef CONFIG_SMP last_task_used_math =NULL ;#else -current_thread_info ()->flags &= ~_TIF_USEDFPU; +clear_ti_thread_flag (current_thread_info (),TIF_USEDFPU );#endif }
@@ -466,13 +466,13 @@ int copy_thread(int nr, unsigned long clone_flags, unsigned long sp,#ifndef CONFIG_SMP if (last_task_used_math = current) {#else -if (current_thread_info ()->flags & _TIF_USEDFPU) { +if (test_ti_thread_flag (current_thread_info (),TIF_USEDFPU )) {#endif put_psr (get_psr () |PSR_EF );fpsave (&p->thread.float_regs[0 ], &p->thread.fsr, &p->thread.fpqueue[0 ], &p->thread.fpqdepth);#ifdef CONFIG_SMP -current_thread_info ()->flags &= ~_TIF_USEDFPU; +clear_ti_thread_flag (current_thread_info (),TIF_USEDFPU );#endif }
@@ -609,13 +609,14 @@ int dump_fpu (struct pt_regs * regs, elf_fpregset_t * fpregs)return 1 ; }#ifdef CONFIG_SMP -if (current_thread_info ()->flags & _TIF_USEDFPU) { +if (test_ti_thread_flag (current_thread_info (),TIF_USEDFPU )) {put_psr (get_psr () |PSR_EF );fpsave (¤t->thread.float_regs[0 ], ¤t->thread.fsr, ¤t->thread.fpqueue[0 ], ¤t->thread.fpqdepth);if (regs !=NULL ) { regs->psr &= ~(PSR_EF ); -current_thread_info ()->flags &= ~(_TIF_USEDFPU); +clear_ti_thread_flag (current_thread_info (), +TIF_USEDFPU ); } }#else
arch/sparc/kernel/traps.c +3 -3
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ void do_fpd_trap(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long pc, unsigned long npc, } else {fpload (¤t->thread.float_regs[0 ], ¤t->thread.fsr); } -current_thread_info ()->flags |= _TIF_USEDFPU; +set_ti_thread_flag (current_thread_info (),TIF_USEDFPU );#endif }
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ void do_fpe_trap(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long pc, unsigned long npc,#ifndef CONFIG_SMP if (!fpt) {#else -if (!(task_thread_info (fpt)->flags & _TIF_USEDFPU)) { +if (!test_ti_thread_flag (task_thread_info (fpt),TIF_USEDFPU )) {#endif fpsave (&fake_regs[0 ], &fake_fsr, &fake_queue[0 ], &fake_depth); regs->psr &= ~PSR_EF ;
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@ void do_fpe_trap(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long pc, unsigned long npc,/* nope, better SIGFPE the offending process... */ #ifdef CONFIG_SMP -task_thread_info (fpt)->flags &= ~_TIF_USEDFPU; +clear_tsk_thread_flag (fpt,TIF_USEDFPU );#endif if (psr &PSR_PS ) {/* The first fsr store/load we tried trapped,
Signature · 3 lines
Mathieu Desnoyers Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
Review void exit_thread(void) · line 354
Quoted 9 lines · Mathieu Desnoyers
(quoted diff) +1
-1@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ void exit_thread(void) #ifndef CONFIG_SMP if(last_task_used_math = current) { #else - if(current_thread_info()->flags & _TIF_USEDFPU) { + if(test_ti_thread_flag(current_thread_info(), TIF_USEDFPU)) { #endif /* Keep process from leaving FPU in a bogon state. */ put_psr(get_psr() | PSR_EF);
Oh dear. Could we bit a bit more idiomatic here? For instance, something like:
Index: linux-2.6/arch/sparc/kernel/process.c
=================================--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/sparc/kernel/process.c 2007-03-09 23:24:12.934472032 -0800
+++ linux-2.6/arch/sparc/kernel/process.c 2007-03-09 23:29:26.592346376 -0800
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
if(last_task_used_math = current) {
#else
- if(current_thread_info()->flags & _TIF_USEDFPU) {
+ if (test_thread_flag(TIF_USEDFPU)) {
#endif
/* Keep process from leaving FPU in a bogon state. */ put_psr(get_psr() | PSR_EF);
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
last_task_used_math = NULL;
#else
- current_thread_info()->flags &= ~_TIF_USEDFPU;
+ clear_thread_flag(TIF_USEDFPU);
#endif
}
}
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
if(last_task_used_math = current) {
#else
- if(current_thread_info()->flags & _TIF_USEDFPU) {
+ if (test_thread_flag(TIF_USEDFPU)) {
#endif
/* Clean the fpu. */
put_psr(get_psr() | PSR_EF);
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
last_task_used_math = NULL;
#else
- current_thread_info()->flags &= ~_TIF_USEDFPU;
+ clear_thread_flag(TIF_USEDFPU);
#endif
}
@@ -466,13 +466,13 @@
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
if(last_task_used_math = current) {
#else
- if(current_thread_info()->flags & _TIF_USEDFPU) {
+ if (test_thread_flag(TIF_USEDFPU)) {
#endif
put_psr(get_psr() | PSR_EF); fpsave(&p->thread.float_regs[0], &p->thread.fsr,
&p->thread.fpqueue[0], &p->thread.fpqdepth);
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- current_thread_info()->flags &= ~_TIF_USEDFPU;
+ clear_thread_flag(TIF_USEDFPU);
#endif
}
@@ -609,13 +609,13 @@
return 1;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- if (current_thread_info()->flags & _TIF_USEDFPU) {
+ if (test_thread_flag(TIF_USEDFPU)) {
put_psr(get_psr() | PSR_EF); fpsave(¤t->thread.float_regs[0], ¤t->thread.fsr,
¤t->thread.fpqueue[0], ¤t->thread.fpqdepth);
if (regs != NULL) {
regs->psr &= ~(PSR_EF);
- current_thread_info()->flags &= ~(_TIF_USEDFPU);
+ clear_thread_flag(TIF_USEDFPU);
}
}
#else
Index: linux-2.6/arch/sparc/kernel/traps.c
=================================--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/sparc/kernel/traps.c 2007-03-09 23:40:33.994379450 -0800
+++ linux-2.6/arch/sparc/kernel/traps.c 2007-03-09 23:44:07.910569839 -0800
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@
} else {
fpload(¤t->thread.float_regs[0], ¤t->thread.fsr);
}
- current_thread_info()->flags |= _TIF_USEDFPU;
+ set_thread_flag(TIF_USEDFPU);
#endif
}
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
if(!fpt) {
#else
- if(!(task_thread_info(fpt)->flags & _TIF_USEDFPU)) {
+ if (!test_tsk_thread_flag(fpt, TIF_USEDFPU)) {
#endif
fpsave(&fake_regs[0], &fake_fsr, &fake_queue[0], &fake_depth); regs->psr &= ~PSR_EF;
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@
/* nope, better SIGFPE the offending process... */
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
- task_thread_info(fpt)->flags &= ~_TIF_USEDFPU;
+ clear_tsk_thread_flag(fpt, TIF_USEDFPU);
#endif
if(psr & PSR_PS) {
/* The first fsr store/load we tried trapped,
David Miller
maintainerFrom: William Lee Irwin III <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:26:46 -0800
Quoted 5 lines · Mathieu Desnoyers
Quoted 4 lines
(quoted diff) +0
-0@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ void exit_thread(void) #ifndef CONFIG_SMP if(last_task_used_math = current) { #else
Quoted 8 lines
Review void exit_thread(void) · line 354
Quoted 5 lines
(quoted diff) +1
-1- if(current_thread_info()->flags & _TIF_USEDFPU) { + if(test_ti_thread_flag(current_thread_info(), TIF_USEDFPU)) { #endif /* Keep process from leaving FPU in a bogon state. */ put_psr(get_psr() | PSR_EF);Oh dear. Could we bit a bit more idiomatic here? For instance, something like:
Ok I pulled the sparc32 patch back out until there is some consensus here :)
Quoted 2 lines · William Lee Irwin III
Quoted 2 lines
Oh dear. Could we bit a bit more idiomatic here? For instance, something like:
Quoted 2 lines · David Miller
Ok I pulled the sparc32 patch back out until there is some consensus here :)
It's just a minor touch-up. If Mathieu is okay with it, I'd rather leave him as the author and just send along an Acked-by: with it. I'm not terribly attached to it, either. I just choked on my soda when I saw set_ti_thread_flag(task_thread_info(fpt), TI_USEDFPU) etc. go by. (Which reminds me, I really need to figure out how to consolidate the UP and SMP cases for all this.)
-- wli
Quoted 16 lines · * William Lee Irwin III ([email protected]) wrote:
Quoted 2 lines · William Lee Irwin III
Quoted 2 lines
Oh dear. Could we bit a bit more idiomatic here? For instance, something like:
Quoted 2 lines · David Miller
Ok I pulled the sparc32 patch back out until there is some consensus here :)
It's just a minor touch-up. If Mathieu is okay with it, I'd rather leave him as the author and just send along an Acked-by: with it. I'm not terribly attached to it, either. I just choked on my soda when I saw
set_ti_thread_flag(task_thread_info(fpt), TI_USEDFPU)etc. go by. (Which reminds me, I really need to figure out how to consolidate the UP and SMP cases for all this.)
Quoted 1 line
-- wli
Hello,
William's implementation is indeed neater than mine. So the consensus goes to his patch as far as I'm concerned.
Mathieu
Signature · 3 lines
Mathieu Desnoyers Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
David Miller
maintainerFrom: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 03:17:43 -0500
Quoted 1 line
Fix sparc
TIF_USEDFPUflag atomicity
Also applied, thanks again.