mxser: spin_lock() => spin_lock_irq()
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 mxser: spin_lock() => spin_lock_irq()
This should be spin_lock_irq() to match the spin_unlock_irq(). Originally it was a lock_kernel() but we switched everything to spin_lock_irq() last November.
Signed-off-by Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
drivers/char/mxser.c +1 -1
@@ -1768,7 +1768,7 @@ static int mxser_ioctl(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *file,int len, lsr; len =mxser_chars_in_buffer (tty); -spin_lock (&info->slock); +spin_lock_irq (&info->slock); lsr =inb (info->ioaddr +UART_LSR ) &UART_LSR_THRE ;spin_unlock_irq (&info->slock); len += (lsr ?0 :1 );
Quoted 11 lines · Dan Carpenter
This should be
spin_lock_irq()to match thespin_unlock_irq(). Originally it was alock_kernel()but we switched everything tospin_lock_irq()last November.Signed-off-by Dan Carpenter<[email protected]>drivers/char/mxser.c +0
-0
drivers/char/mxser.c static int mxser_ioctl(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *file, · line 1771
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/char/mxser.c +1
-1@@ -1768,7 +1768,7 @@ static int mxser_ioctl(struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *file,int len, lsr; len =mxser_chars_in_buffer (tty); -spin_lock (&info->slock); +spin_lock_irq (&info->slock);
Hmm, and there is one more error in the MOXA_ASPP_MON case. Interrupts are not disabled at all there. Could you fix that too?
Thanks.