extcon: Set platform drvdata in gpio_extcon_probe() and fix irq leak

Quoted 7 lines

Quoted 6 lines

Add missing platform_set_drvdata() in gpio_extcon_probe(), otherwise calling platform_get_drvdata in gpio_extcon_remove() returns NULL.

Also add missing free_irq call in gpio_extcon_remove().

Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>

Quoted 7 lines

Thanks!

Acked-by MyungJoo Ham <[email protected]>

I'll apply this patch to the extcon-for-next.
I would appear in http://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung/shortlog/refs/heads/extcon-for-next soon after syncing servers.

Does this mean you are going to have a separate extcon git tree somewhere, feeding into linux-next, and sending stuff directly to Linus?

I don't see an entry in the MAINTAINERS file saying this, which is why I was picking up extcon patches, should I not be doing this?

confused,

greg k-h

Quoted 22 lines · 함명주

Quoted 7 lines

Quoted 6 lines

Add missing platform_set_drvdata() in gpio_extcon_probe(), otherwise calling platform_get_drvdata in gpio_extcon_remove() returns NULL.

Also add missing free_irq call in gpio_extcon_remove().

Signed-off-by Axel Lin <[email protected]>

Quoted 7 lines

Thanks!

Acked-by MyungJoo Ham <[email protected]>

I'll apply this patch to the extcon-for-next.
I would appear in http://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung/shortlog/refs/heads/extcon-for-next soon after syncing servers.

Does this mean you are going to have a separate extcon git tree somewhere, feeding into linux-next, and sending stuff directly to Linus?

I don't see an entry in the MAINTAINERS file saying this, which is why I was picking up extcon patches, should I not be doing this?

Quoted 4 lines

confused,

greg k-h

You are right. We do not have MAINTAINERS entry for extcon.

I can wait until we have MAINTAINERS entry registered for extcon, which we have not request or submit, yet. Until then, I think you may pick up the extcon patches and I will simply follow your repositories (keep rebasing from yours)