regulator: tps65910: fix BUG_ON() shown with vrtc regulator
Subsystems (2)
PATCH RESEND 1/1 regulator: tps65910: fix BUG_ON() shown with vrtc regulator
Fix BUG_ON() error if tps65910 VRTC regulator is used with out rdev->desc->volt_table data. Recent changes in regulator core driver which add support for "regulator_list_voltage_table" have BUG_ON() if regulator descriptor do not have voltage table information. This patch adds the voltage table information to fix the issue.
--- drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
drivers/regulator/tps65910-regulator.c +7 -0
@@ -38,6 +38,11 @@ static const unsigned int VIO_VSEL_table[] = {/* VSEL tables for TPS65910 specific LDOs and dcdc's */ +/* supported VRTC voltages in microvolts */ +static const unsigned int VRTC_VSEL_table[] = { +1800000 , +}; +/* supported VDD3 voltages in microvolts */ static const unsigned int VDD3_VSEL_table[] = {5000000 ,
@@ -95,6 +100,8 @@ static struct tps_info tps65910_regs[] = { { .name = "vrtc", .vin_name = "vcc7", + .n_voltages = ARRAY_SIZE(VRTC_VSEL_table), + .voltage_table = VRTC_VSEL_table, .enable_time_us = 2200, }, {
Signature · 1 line
1.7.9.5
Quoted 5 lines · AnilKumar Ch
Fix
BUG_ON()error if tps65910 VRTC regulator is used with outrdev->desc->volt_tabledata. Recent changes in regulator core driver which add support for "regulator_list_voltage_table" haveBUG_ON()if regulator descriptor do not have voltage table information. This patch adds the voltage table information to fix the issue.
This is already applied... got dropped from -next for a day for some reason but it's there. When resending please do say why.
Quoted 10 lines · Mark Brown
Quoted 5 lines · AnilKumar Ch
Fix
BUG_ON()error if tps65910 VRTC regulator is used with outrdev->desc->volt_tabledata. Recent changes in regulator core driver which add support for "regulator_list_voltage_table" haveBUG_ON()if regulator descriptor do not have voltage table information. This patch adds the voltage table information to fix the issue.This is already applied... got dropped from -next for a day for some reason but it's there. When resending please do say why.
Hi Mark,
Sorry for the noise (My bad missed the version change details). I have checked in regulator/for-next tree and not found, so resend the patch thanks for you time.
Thanks
AnilKumar
Quoted 8 lines · Chimata
Quoted 2 lines · Mark Brown
This is already applied... got dropped from -next for a day for some reason but it's there. When resending please do say why.
Sorry for the noise (My bad missed the version change details). I have checked in regulator/for-next tree and not found, so resend the patch thanks for you time.
Sure, no problem - the thing about saying why you're reposting is more for future reference, if you follow my advice and repost when you think something got forgotten or lost.