su01: do pre-checking to avoid annoying warnings
Ning
PATCH 1/1 su01: do pre-checking to avoid annoying warnings
From: Ning Han <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by Ning Han <[email protected]>
--- testcases/commands/su/su01 | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
testcases/commands/su/su01 +4 -4
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ rm -f $TEST_ENV_FILE > /dev/null 2>&1 #Create 1st test user #erase user if he may exist , so we can have a clean en rm -rf /home/$TEST_USER1 - userdel $TEST_USER1 + getent passwd $TEST_USER1 && userdel $TEST_USER1 sleep 1 useradd -m -g users $TEST_USER1
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ rm -f $TEST_ENV_FILE > /dev/null 2>&1 then { USER_UID=`id -u $TEST_USER1` USER_GID=`id -g $TEST_USER1` - mkdir $TEST_USER1_HOMEDIR + mkdir -p $TEST_USER1_HOMEDIR chown -R $USER_UID.$USER_GID $TEST_USER1_HOMEDIR } fi
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ rm -f $TEST_ENV_FILE > /dev/null 2>&1 #Create 2nd test user #erase user if he may exist , so we can have a clean en rm -rf /home/$TEST_USER2 - userdel $TEST_USER2 + getent passwd $TEST_USER2 && userdel $TEST_USER2 sleep 1 useradd -m -g users $TEST_USER2
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ rm -f $TEST_ENV_FILE > /dev/null 2>&1 then { USER_UID=`id -u $TEST_USER2` USER_GID=`id -g $TEST_USER2` - mkdir $TEST_USER2_HOMEDIR + mkdir -p $TEST_USER2_HOMEDIR chown -R $USER_UID.$USER_GID $TEST_USER2_HOMEDIR } fi
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
PATCH 1/1 su01: do pre-checking to avoid annoying warnings
Hi!
testcases/commands/su/su01 rm -f $TEST_ENV_FILE > /dev/null 2>&1 · line 89
Quoted 2 lines
testcases/commands/su/su01 +1
-1- userdel $TEST_USER1 + getent passwd $TEST_USER1 && userdel $TEST_USER1
Shouldn't we redirect the output from getent to /dev/null here?
Otherwise it looks fine.
Signature · 2 lines
Cyril Hrubis [email protected]
PATCH 1/1 su01: do pre-checking to avoid annoying warnings
Quoted 5 lines · Cyril Hrubis
Hi!
testcases/commands/su/su01 rm -f $TEST_ENV_FILE > /dev/null 2>&1 · line 89
Quoted 2 lines
testcases/commands/su/su01 +1
-1- userdel $TEST_USER1 + getent passwd $TEST_USER1 && userdel $TEST_USER1Shouldn't we redirect the output from getent to
/dev/nullhere?
Yes, we should. I'll send another patch for this.
Quoted 6 lines
Otherwise it looks fine.
Signature · 2 lines
Cyril Hrubis [email protected]