v4.15-rc2 on thinkpad x60: ethernet stopped working
Subsystems (2)
Hi!
In v4.15-rc2+, network manager can not see my ethernet card, and manual attempts to ifconfig it up did not really help, either.
Card is:
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573L Gigabit Ethernet Controller
Dmesg says:
dmesg | grep eth
[ 0.648931] e1000e 0000:02:00.0 eth0: (PCI Express:2.5GT/s:Width x1) 00:16:d3:25:19:04 [ 0.648934] e1000e 0000:02:00.0 eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection [ 0.649012] e1000e 0000:02:00.0 eth0: MAC: 2, PHY: 2, PBA No: 005302-003 [ 0.706510] usbcore: registered new interface driver cdc_ether [ 6.557022] e1000e 0000:02:00.0 eth1: renamed from eth0 [ 6.577554] systemd-udevd[2363]: renamed network interface eth0 to
eth1
Any ideas?
Pavel
Signature · 9 lines
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20171210/d9e8d378/attachment.asc>
Quoted 1 line · Pavel Machek
Hi!
Hi,
Quoted 20 lines
In v4.15-rc2+, network manager can not see my ethernet card, and manual attempts to ifconfig it up did not really help, either.
Card is:
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573L Gigabit Ethernet Controller
Dmesg says:
dmesg | grep eth
[ 0.648931] e1000e 0000:02:00.0 eth0: (PCI Express:2.5GT/s:Width x1) 00:16:d3:25:19:04 [ 0.648934] e1000e 0000:02:00.0 eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection [ 0.649012] e1000e 0000:02:00.0 eth0: MAC: 2, PHY: 2, PBA No: 005302-003 [ 0.706510] usbcore: registered new interface driver cdc_ether [ 6.557022] e1000e 0000:02:00.0 eth1: renamed from eth0 [ 6.577554] systemd-udevd[2363]: renamed network interface eth0 to
Quoted 3 lines
eth1
Any ideas ?
Yes , 19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013 broke it.
See:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198047
Fix there :
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151272209903675&w=2
Regards,
Gabriel C
Hi!
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
In v4.15-rc2+, network manager can not see my ethernet card, and manual attempts to ifconfig it up did not really help, either.
Card is:
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573L Gigabit Ethernet Controller
....
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 1 line
Any ideas ?
Yes ,
19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013broke it.See:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198047Fix there :
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151272209903675&w=2
I don't see the patch in latest mainline. Not having ethernet is... somehow annoying. What is going on there?
Pavel
Signature · 9 lines
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20171215/daac13ea/attachment.asc>
David Miller
maintainerFrom: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:28:49 +0100
Quoted 14 lines
Hi!
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
In v4.15-rc2+, network manager can not see my ethernet card, and manual attempts to ifconfig it up did not really help, either.
Card is:
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573L Gigabit Ethernet Controller
....
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
Any ideas ?
Yes ,
19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013broke it.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
See:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198047Fix there :
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151272209903675&w=2I don't see the patch in latest mainline. Not having ethernet is... somehow annoying. What is going on there?
Generally speaking, e1000 maintainence has been handled very poorly over the past few years, I have to say.
Fixes take forever to propagate even when someone other than the maintainer provides a working and tested fix, just like this case.
Jeff, please take e1000 maintainence seriously and get these critical bug fixes propagated.
Thank you.
Hi!
Quoted 21 lines
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
In v4.15-rc2+, network manager can not see my ethernet card, and manual attempts to ifconfig it up did not really help, either.
Card is:
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573L Gigabit Ethernet Controller
....
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line
Any ideas ?
Yes ,
19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013broke it.Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
See:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198047Fix there :
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151272209903675&w=2I don't see the patch in latest mainline. Not having ethernet is... somehow annoying. What is going on there?
Quoted 8 lines
Generally speaking, e1000 maintainence has been handled very poorly over the past few years, I have to say.
Fixes take forever to propagate even when someone other than the maintainer provides a working and tested fix, just like this case.
Jeff, please take e1000 maintainence seriously and get these critical bug fixes propagated.
No response AFAICT. I guess I should test reverting 19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013, then ask you for revert?
Pavel
Signature · 9 lines
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20171218/d4ab524e/attachment.asc>
Neftin
Quoted 31 lines · Pavel Machek
Hi!
Quoted 18 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
In v4.15-rc2+, network manager can not see my ethernet card, and manual attempts to ifconfig it up did not really help, either.
Card is:
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573L Gigabit Ethernet Controller
....
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
Any ideas ?
Yes ,
19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013broke it.Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
See:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198047Fix there :
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151272209903675&w=2I don't see the patch in latest mainline. Not having ethernet is... somehow annoying. What is going on there?
Quoted 8 lines
Generally speaking, e1000 maintainence has been handled very poorly over the past few years, I have to say.
Fixes take forever to propagate even when someone other than the maintainer provides a working and tested fix, just like this case.
Jeff, please take e1000 maintainence seriously and get these critical bug fixes propagated.
No response AFAICT. I guess I should test reverting
19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013, then ask you for revert?
Quoted 7 lines
Pavel
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan at osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
Hello Pavel,
Before ask for reverting 19110cfbb..., please, check if follow patch of Benjamin work for you http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/846825/
Thanks,
Sasha
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20171218/9c3eb9f7/attachment.html>
Quoted 29 lines · Sasha
Quoted 28 lines · Pavel Machek
Hi!
Quoted 26 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
In v4.15-rc2+, network manager can not see my ethernet card, and manual attempts to ifconfig it up did not really help, either.
Card is:
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573L Gigabit Ethernet Controller
....
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
Any ideas ?
Yes ,
19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013broke it.Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
See:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198047Fix there :
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151272209903675&w=2I don't see the patch in latest mainline. Not having ethernet is... somehow annoying. What is going on there?
Generally speaking, e1000 maintainence has been handled very poorly over the past few years, I have to say.
Fixes take forever to propagate even when someone other than the maintainer provides a working and tested fix, just like this case.
Jeff, please take e1000 maintainence seriously and get these critical bug fixes propagated.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 2 lines
No response AFAICT. I guess I should test reverting
19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013, then ask you for revert?Hello Pavel,
Before ask for reverting
19110cfbb..., please, check if follow patch of Benjamin work for you http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/846825/
Jacob said, in another email:
# Digging into this, the problem is complicated. The original bug
# assumed behavior of the .check_for_link call, which is universally not
# implemented.
#
# I think the correct fix is to revert 19110cfbb34d ("e1000e: Separate
# signaling for link check/link up", 2017-10-10) and find a more proper solution....which makes me think that revert is preffered?
Pavel
Signature · 9 lines
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20171218/fbeb0aaa/attachment.asc>
Quoted 45 lines · Pavel Machek
Quoted 27 lines · Sasha
Quoted 26 lines · Pavel Machek
Hi!
Quoted 24 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
In v4.15-rc2+, network manager can not see my ethernet card, and manual attempts to ifconfig it up did not really help, either.
Card is:
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573L Gigabit Ethernet Controller
....
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
Any ideas ?
Yes ,
19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013broke it.Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
See:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198047Fix there :
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151272209903675&w=2I don't see the patch in latest mainline. Not having ethernet is... somehow annoying. What is going on there?
Generally speaking, e1000 maintainence has been handled very poorly over the past few years, I have to say.
Fixes take forever to propagate even when someone other than the maintainer provides a working and tested fix, just like this case.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Jeff, please take e1000 maintainence seriously and get these critical bug fixes propagated.
No response AFAICT. I guess I should test reverting
19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013, then ask you for revert?Hello Pavel,
Before ask for reverting
19110cfbb..., please, check if follow patch of Benjamin work for you http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/846825/Jacob said, in another email:
# Digging into this, the problem is complicated. The original bug
# assumed behavior of the .check_for_link call, which is universally not # implemented. # # I think the correct fix is to revert 19110cfbb34d ("e1000e: Separate # signaling for link check/link up", 2017-10-10) and find a more proper solution.
Quoted 4 lines
...which makes me think that revert is preffered?
Pavel
Pavel, before ask for revert - let's check Benjamin's patch following to his previous patch. Previous patch was not competed and latest one come to complete changes.
Jeff was out sick last week. It might take him a bit to catch up.
I'll remind him when I see him next (which I hope is soon).
Todd Fujinaka
Software Application Engineer
Datacenter Engineering Group
Intel Corporation
todd.fujinaka at intel.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces at osuosl.org] On Behalf Of Neftin, Sasha
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 7:50 AM
To: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>; Keller, Jacob E <[email protected]>
Cc: bpoirier at suse.com; nix.or.die at gmail.com; netdev at vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; intel-wired-lan at lists.osuosl.org; lsorense at csclub.uwaterloo.ca; David Miller <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] v4.15-rc2 on thinkpad x60: ethernet stopped working
Quoted 40 lines · Pavel Machek
Quoted 27 lines · Sasha
Quoted 26 lines · Pavel Machek
Hi!
Quoted 24 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
In v4.15-rc2+, network manager can not see my ethernet card, and manual attempts to ifconfig it up did not really help, either.
Card is:
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573L Gigabit Ethernet Controller
....
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
Any ideas ?
Yes ,
19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013broke it.Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
See:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198047Fix there :
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151272209903675&w=2I don't see the patch in latest mainline. Not having ethernet is... somehow annoying. What is going on there?
Generally speaking, e1000 maintainence has been handled very poorly over the past few years, I have to say.
Fixes take forever to propagate even when someone other than the maintainer provides a working and tested fix, just like this case.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Jeff, please take e1000 maintainence seriously and get these critical bug fixes propagated.
No response AFAICT. I guess I should test reverting
19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013, then ask you for revert?Hello Pavel,
Before ask for reverting
19110cfbb..., please, check if follow patch of Benjamin work for you http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/846825/Jacob said, in another email:
# Digging into this, the problem is complicated. The original bug # assumed behavior of the .check_for_link call, which is universally not
Quoted 9 lines
# implemented. # # I think the correct fix is to revert 19110cfbb34d ("e1000e: Separate # signaling for link check/link up", 2017-10-10) and find a more proper solution....which makes me think that revert is preffered?
Pavel
Pavel, before ask for revert - let's check Benjamin's patch following to his previous patch. Previous patch was not competed and latest one come to complete changes.
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan at osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
Hi!
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Before ask for reverting
19110cfbb..., please, check if follow patch of Benjamin work for you http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/846825/Pavel, before ask for revert - let's check Benjamin's patch following to his previous patch. Previous patch was not competed and latest one come to complete changes.
v4.15-rc4+:
Ethernet works with 19110cfbb reverted.
Ethernet works With patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/846825/ applied.
Pavel
Signature · 9 lines
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20171220/eccc321a/attachment.asc>
Quoted 6 lines · Pavel Machek
Hi!
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Before ask for reverting
19110cfbb..., please, check if follow patch of Benjamin work for you http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/846825/
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Pavel, before ask for revert - let's check Benjamin's patch following to his previous patch. Previous patch was not competed and latest one come to complete changes.
v4.15-rc4+:
Ethernet works with
19110cfbbreverted.Ethernet works With patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/846825/ applied.
Hmm. So... ethernet originally did not work with patch/846825/ applied or 19110cfbb reverted, so I re-plugged ethernet cables. Now it works even with plain v4.15-rc4+.
So it looks like the bug was fixed in the mainline in the meantime...?
Sorry for the noise,
Pavel
Signature · 9 lines
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20171220/4cd6c7ff/attachment.asc>
Quoted 12 lines · Pavel Machek
Quoted 11 lines · Pavel Machek
Hi!
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Before ask for reverting
19110cfbb..., please, check if follow patch of Benjamin work for you http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/846825/Pavel, before ask for revert - let's check Benjamin's patch following to his previous patch. Previous patch was not competed and latest one come to complete changes.
v4.15-rc4+:
Ethernet works with
19110cfbbreverted.Ethernet works With patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/846825/ applied.
Quoted 8 lines
Hmm. So... ethernet originally did not work with patch/846825/ applied or
19110cfbbreverted, so I re-plugged ethernet cables. Now it works even with plain v4.15-rc4+.So it looks like the bug was fixed in the mainline in the meantime...?
Sorry for the noise,
Pavel
Good Pavel, thanks for update us, let's keep both patch applied and see ethernet adapter behavior.
Quoted 53 lines · Sasha
Quoted 48 lines · Pavel Machek
Quoted 29 lines · Sasha
Quoted 28 lines · Pavel Machek
Hi!
Quoted 26 lines
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
In v4.15-rc2+, network manager can not see my ethernet card, and manual attempts to ifconfig it up did not really help, either.
Card is:
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573L Gigabit Ethernet
Controller....
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 1 line
Any ideas ?
Yes ,
19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013broke it.Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
See:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198047Fix there :
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151272209903675&w=2I don't see the patch in latest mainline. Not having ethernet is... somehow annoying. What is going on there?
Generally speaking, e1000 maintainence has been handled very poorly over
the past few years, I have to say.Fixes take forever to propagate even when someone other than the maintainer provides a working and tested fix, just like this case.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Jeff, please take e1000 maintainence seriously and get these critical bug fixes propagated.
No response AFAICT. I guess I should test reverting
19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013, then ask you for revert?Hello Pavel,
Before ask for reverting
19110cfbb..., please, check if follow patch of Benjamin work for you http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/846825/Jacob said, in another email:
# Digging into this, the problem is complicated. The original bug
# assumed behavior of the .check_for_link call, which is universally not # implemented. # # I think the correct fix is to revert 19110cfbb34d ("e1000e: Separate # signaling for link check/link up", 2017-10-10) and find a more proper solution.Quoted 4 lines
...which makes me think that revert is preffered?
??????????????????????????????????? Pavel
Quoted 8 lines
Pavel, before ask for revert - let's check Benjamin's patch following to his previous patch. Previous patch was not competed and latest one come to complete changes.
_______________________________________________
Intel-wired-lan mailing list
Intel-wired-lan at osuosl.org
https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
Pavel, any update? Is Benjamin's last patch solved your network problem?
Quoted 43 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: netdev-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner at vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Gabriel C
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2017 4:44 AM
To: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>; kernel list <[email protected]>
Cc: Kirsher, Jeffrey T <[email protected]>; intel-wired- lan at lists.osuosl.org; netdev at vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: v4.15-rc2 on thinkpad x60: ethernet stopped workingQuoted 1 line · Pavel Machek
Hi!
Hi,
Quoted 20 lines
In v4.15-rc2+, network manager can not see my ethernet card, and manual attempts to ifconfig it up did not really help, either.
Card is:
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573L Gigabit Ethernet Controller
Dmesg says:
dmesg | grep eth
[ 0.648931] e1000e 0000:02:00.0 eth0: (PCI Express:2.5GT/s:Width x1) 00:16:d3:25:19:04 [ 0.648934] e1000e 0000:02:00.0 eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection [ 0.649012] e1000e 0000:02:00.0 eth0: MAC: 2, PHY: 2, PBA No: 005302-003 [ 0.706510] usbcore: registered new interface driver cdc_ether [ 6.557022] e1000e 0000:02:00.0 eth1: renamed from eth0 [ 6.577554] systemd-udevd[2363]: renamed network interface eth0 toQuoted 3 lines
eth1
Any ideas ?
Yes ,
19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013broke it.
Quoted 6 lines
Fix there :
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151272209903675&w=2Regards,
Gabriel C
Hi,
Digging into this, the problem is complicated. The original bug assumed behavior of the .check_for_link call, which is universally not implemented.
I think the correct fix is to revert 19110cfbb34d ("e1000e: Separate signaling for link check/link up", 2017-10-10) and find a more proper solution.
I don't think any other code which uses check_for_link expects the interface to return in the way this patch attempted.
Thanks,
Jake
Quoted 66 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: Intel-wired-lan [mailto:intel-wired-lan-bounces at osuosl.org] On Behalf Of Keller, Jacob E
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 9:29 AM
To: Gabriel C <[email protected]>; Pavel Machek <[email protected]>; kernel list <[email protected]>
Cc: netdev at vger.kernel.org; intel-wired-lan at lists.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] v4.15-rc2 on thinkpad x60: ethernet stopped workingQuoted 2 lines
-----Original Message-----
From: netdev-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner at vger.kernel.org]
Quoted 41 lines
On Behalf Of Gabriel C
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2017 4:44 AM
To: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>; kernel list <[email protected]>
Cc: Kirsher, Jeffrey T <[email protected]>; intel-wired- lan at lists.osuosl.org; netdev at vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: v4.15-rc2 on thinkpad x60: ethernet stopped workingQuoted 1 line · Pavel Machek
Hi!
Hi,
Quoted 20 lines
In v4.15-rc2+, network manager can not see my ethernet card, and manual attempts to ifconfig it up did not really help, either.
Card is:
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573L Gigabit Ethernet Controller
Dmesg says:
dmesg | grep eth
[ 0.648931] e1000e 0000:02:00.0 eth0: (PCI Express:2.5GT/s:Width x1) 00:16:d3:25:19:04 [ 0.648934] e1000e 0000:02:00.0 eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection [ 0.649012] e1000e 0000:02:00.0 eth0: MAC: 2, PHY: 2, PBA No: 005302-003 [ 0.706510] usbcore: registered new interface driver cdc_ether [ 6.557022] e1000e 0000:02:00.0 eth1: renamed from eth0 [ 6.577554] systemd-udevd[2363]: renamed network interface eth0 toQuoted 3 lines
eth1
Any ideas ?
Yes ,
19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013broke it.Quoted 6 lines
Fix there :
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151272209903675&w=2Regards,
Gabriel C
Hi,
Digging into this, the problem is complicated. The original bug assumed behavior of the .check_for_link call, which is universally not implemented.
Quoted 9 lines
I think the correct fix is to revert
19110cfbb34d("e1000e: Separate signaling for link check/link up", 2017-10-10) and find a more proper solution.I don't think any other code which uses
check_for_linkexpects the interface to return in the way this patch attempted.Thanks,
Jake
Alternatively, we can go a step farther and make sure every implementation of .check_for_link follows the modified interface.
Thanks,
Jake
Hi!
Quoted 19 lines
Quoted 19 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 1 line
Any ideas ?
Yes ,
19110cfbb34d4af0cdfe14cd243f3b09dc95b013broke it.Quoted 6 lines
Fix there :
https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=151272209903675&w=2Regards,
Gabriel C
Hi,
Digging into this, the problem is complicated. The original bug assumed behavior of the .check_for_link call, which is universally not implemented.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
I think the correct fix is to revert
19110cfbb34d("e1000e: Separate signaling for link check/link up", 2017-10-10) and find a more proper solution.I don't think any other code which uses
check_for_linkexpects the interface to return in the way this patch attempted.Alternatively, we can go a step farther and make sure every implementation of .check_for_link follows the modified interface.
We are at -rc3 now. Reverting 19110cfbb34d seems like good solution at the moment.
Pavel
Signature · 9 lines
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 181 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20171215/19cf7295/attachment.asc>
Dear Pavel,
Quoted 11 lines · Pavel Machek
In v4.15-rc2+, network manager can not see my ethernet card, and manual attempts to ifconfig it up did not really help, either.
Card is:
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573L Gigabit Ethernet Controller
Dmesg says:
dmesg | grep eth
Quoted 8 lines
[ 0.648931] e1000e 0000:02:00.0 eth0: (PCI Express:2.5GT/s:Width x1) 00:16:d3:25:19:04 [ 0.648934] e1000e 0000:02:00.0 eth0: Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection [ 0.649012] e1000e 0000:02:00.0 eth0: MAC: 2, PHY: 2, PBA No: 005302-003 [ 0.706510] usbcore: registered new interface driver cdc_ether [ 6.557022] e1000e 0000:02:00.0 eth1: renamed from eth0 [ 6.577554] systemd-udevd[2363]: renamed network interface eth0 to eth1Any ideas?
I am sorry for jumping in on this so late.
Since using a Lenovo X60t more ofter since a year or so, I experience the issue, that the link doesn?t come up during that period occasionally [1]. I haven?t tried the latest patches yet, but it might be unrelated.
Did you test, that removing and loading the e1000e module fixes the issue?
Additionally, I was asked privately to test the out of tree driver, but haven?t had time yet.
Quoted 3 lines
You might give the out-of-tree driver a try, you can download it here
https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/26549/Intel-Network-Adapter-Driver-for-PCIe-Intel-Gigabit-Ethernet-Network-Connections-Under-Linux-?product=19297
It's version is 3.3.5, dated 8/2016
Kind regards,
Paul
[1]
https://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/Week-of-Mon-20170410/008590.html
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: Paul Menzel <[email protected]>
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] e1000e: Link down after startup on Lenovo X60
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 16:31:45 +0200
Size: 6867
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20171221/0804f19a/attachment-0001.mht>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5174 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20171221/0804f19a/attachment-0001.p7s>