ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the reset framework
Subsystems (7)
v5 cover ARM: davinci: complete the conversion to using the reset framework
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
This series converts the only user of the handcoded, mach-specific reset routines in the davinci platform to using the reset framework.
Patches 1-3 add necessary lookups/DT-properties.
Patches 4-6 fix issues found in the remoteproc davinci driver.
Patch 7 converts the davinci-rproc driver to the reset framework.
Patch 8 removes now dead code.
Tested both in DT and legacy modes by booting the examples from ti-ipc-rtos recipe in meta-ti.
This series applies on top of David Lechner's common-clk-v9 branch[1] with Philipp Zabel's reset/next branch[2] pulled in.
It can be found in my github tree as well[3].
[1] git://github.com/dlech/ev3dev-kernel.git common-clk-v9
[2] git://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux reset/next
[3] git at github.com:brgl/linux.git topic/davinci-reset
v1 -> v2:
- fixed the device tree patches the descriptions of which were mixed up
- return -EPROBE_DEFER from davinci-rproc's probe() if we can't get the reset provider, since it's possible that the lookup table was not yet registered
- made the local variable naming consistent in the davinci-rproc driver
- fixed a typo in PATCH 5/8
v2 -> v3:
- modify PATCH 1/8: drop the provider argument from the function adding lookup entries and instead pass the provider name to the RESET_LOOKUP macro, return -EPROBE_DEFER if we locate a correct lookup entry but cannot get the corresponding reset controller
- modify the reset lookup entry in psc-da850
- don't manually return -EPROBE_DEFER from davinci-rproc, instead don't emit an error message if devm_reset_control_get_exclusive() returns this error code
v3 -> v4:
- make index the second parameter in RESET_LOOKUP() (right after the provider name)
v4 -> v5:
- fix a bug where the dsp_reset object correctly stored in drproc struct
Bartosz Golaszewski (8):
ARM: davinci: dts: make psc0 a reset provider
ARM: davinci: dts: add a reset control to the dsp node
clk: davinci: add a reset lookup table for psc0 remoteproc/davinci: add the missing retval check for clk_enable() remoteproc/davinci: prepare and unprepare the clock where needed remoteproc/davinci: use octal permissions for module_param() remoteproc/davinci: use the reset framework
clk: davinci: kill davinci_clk_reset_assert/deassert()
arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 2 ++ arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/clock.h | 21 -------------- drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da850.c | 7 +++++ drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c | 19 +----------- drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 5 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/clock.h
Signature · 1 line
2.16.3
PATCH v5 1/8 ARM: davinci: dts: make psc0 a reset provider
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
The psc driver registers with the reset framework as a provider. Add the #reset-cells property to the psc0 node.
--- arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi +1 -0
@@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ compatible = "ti,da850-psc0"; reg = <0x10000 0x1000>; #clock-cells = <1>; + #reset-cells = <1>; #power-domain-cells = <1>; clocks = <&pll0_sysclk 1>, <&pll0_sysclk 2>, <&pll0_sysclk 4>, <&pll0_sysclk 6>,
Signature · 1 line
2.16.3
Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] ARM: davinci: dts: make psc0 a reset provider
Quoted 16 lines · Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
The psc driver registers with the reset framework as a provider. Add the #reset-cells property to the psc0 node.
Signed-off-by Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>--- arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi +0
-0
arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi line 129
Quoted 7 lines
arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi +1
-0@@ -123,6 +123,7 @@ compatible = "ti,da850-psc0"; reg = <0x10000 0x1000>; #clock-cells = <1>; + #reset-cells = <1>; #power-domain-cells = <1>; clocks = <&pll0_sysclk 1>, <&pll0_sysclk 2>, <&pll0_sysclk 4>, <&pll0_sysclk 6>,
PATCH v5 2/8 ARM: davinci: dts: add a reset control to the dsp node
In reply to Bartosz GolaszewskiFrom: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
The davinci-rproc driver will soon use the reset framework. Add the resets property to the dsp node in da850.dtsi.
--- arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi +1 -0
@@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ interrupt-parent = <&intc>; interrupts = <28>; clocks = <&psc0 15>; + resets = <&psc0 15>; status = "disabled"; }; soc at 1c00000 {
Signature · 1 line
2.16.3
Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] ARM: davinci: dts: add a reset control to the dsp node
Quoted 16 lines · Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
The davinci-rproc driver will soon use the reset framework. Add the resets property to the dsp node in
da850.dtsi.Signed-off-by Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>--- arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi +0
-0
arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi line 115
Quoted 7 lines
arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi +1
-0@@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ interrupt-parent = <&intc>; interrupts = <28>; clocks = <&psc0 15>; + resets = <&psc0 15>; status = "disabled"; }; soc at 1c00000 {
PATCH v5 3/8 clk: davinci: add a reset lookup table for psc0
In reply to Bartosz GolaszewskiFrom: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
In order to be able to use the reset framework in legacy boot mode as well, add the reset lookup table to the psc driver for da850 variant.
--- drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da850.c | 7 +++++++ drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
drivers/clk/davinci/psc-da850.c +7 -0
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@*/ #include <linux/clk-provider.h> +#include <linux/reset-controller.h> #include <linux/clk.h> #include <linux/clkdev.h> #include <linux/init.h>
@@ -66,8 +67,14 @@ LPSC_CLKDEV3(ecap_clkdev, "fck", "ecap.0","fck" ,"ecap.1" , "fck", "ecap.2"); +static struct reset_control_lookup da850_psc0_reset_lookup_table[] = { +RESET_LOOKUP ("da850-psc0" ,15 ,"davinci-rproc.0" ,NULL ), +}; +static int da850_psc0_init (struct device *dev,void __iomem *base) { +reset_controller_add_lookup (da850_psc0_reset_lookup_table, +ARRAY_SIZE (da850_psc0_reset_lookup_table));return davinci_psc_register_clocks (dev, da850_psc0_info,16 , base); }
drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c +1 -0
@@ -425,6 +425,7 @@ __davinci_psc_register_clocks(struct device *dev, psc->rcdev.ops = &davinci_psc_reset_ops; psc->rcdev.owner =THIS_MODULE ; + psc->rcdev.dev = dev; psc->rcdev.of_node = dev->of_node; psc->rcdev.of_reset_n_cells =1 ; psc->rcdev.of_xlate = davinci_psc_reset_of_xlate;
Signature · 1 line
2.16.3
Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] clk: davinci: add a reset lookup table for psc0
Quoted 7 lines · Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
In order to be able to use the reset framework in legacy boot mode as well, add the reset lookup table to the psc driver for da850 variant.
Signed-off-by Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>---
Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] clk: davinci: add a reset lookup table for psc0
In reply to Bartosz GolaszewskiQuoting Bartosz Golaszewski (2018-03-30 08:28:51)
Quoted 7 lines
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
In order to be able to use the reset framework in legacy boot mode as well, add the reset lookup table to the psc driver for da850 variant.
Signed-off-by Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>---
Applied to clk-next
PATCH v5 4/8 remoteproc/davinci: add the missing retval check for clk_enable()
In reply to Bartosz GolaszewskiFrom: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
The davinci platform is being switched to using the common clock framework, where clk_enable() can fail. Add the return value check.
--- drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c +7 -1
@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;struct da8xx_rproc *drproc = (struct da8xx_rproc *)rproc->priv;struct clk *dsp_clk = drproc->dsp_clk; +int ret;/* hw requires the start (boot) address be on 1KB boundary */ if (rproc->bootaddr &0x3ff ) {
@@ -148,7 +149,12 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)writel (rproc->bootaddr, drproc->bootreg); -clk_enable (dsp_clk); + ret =clk_enable (dsp_clk); +if (ret) { +dev_err (dev,"clk_enable() failed: %d\n" , ret); +return ret; + } +davinci_clk_reset_deassert (dsp_clk);return 0 ;
Signature · 1 line
2.16.3
Re: [PATCH v5 4/8] remoteproc/davinci: add the missing retval check for clk_enable()
Quoted 8 lines · Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
The davinci platform is being switched to using the common clock framework, where
clk_enable()can fail. Add the return value check.Signed-off-by Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>Acked-by Suman Anna <[email protected]>---
PATCH v5 5/8 remoteproc/davinci: prepare and unprepare the clock where needed
In reply to Bartosz GolaszewskiFrom: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
We're currently switching the platform to using the common clock framework. We need to explicitly prepare and unprepare the rproc clock.
--- drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c +3 -3
@@ -149,9 +149,9 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)writel (rproc->bootaddr, drproc->bootreg); - ret =clk_enable (dsp_clk); + ret =clk_prepare_enable (dsp_clk);if (ret) { -dev_err (dev,"clk_enable() failed: %d\n" , ret); +dev_err (dev,"clk_prepare_enable() failed: %d\n" , ret);return ret; }
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)struct da8xx_rproc *drproc = rproc->priv;davinci_clk_reset_assert (drproc->dsp_clk); -clk_disable (drproc->dsp_clk); +clk_disable_unprepare (drproc->dsp_clk);return 0 ; }
Signature · 1 line
2.16.3
Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] remoteproc/davinci: prepare and unprepare the clock where needed
Quoted 9 lines · Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
We're currently switching the platform to using the common clock framework. We need to explicitly prepare and unprepare the rproc clock.
Signed-off-by Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>Acked-by Suman Anna <[email protected]>---
PATCH v5 6/8 remoteproc/davinci: use octal permissions for module_param()
In reply to Bartosz GolaszewskiFrom: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
Checkpatch recommends to use octal perms instead of S_IRUGO.
--- drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c +1 -1
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@#include "remoteproc_internal.h" static char *da8xx_fw_name; -module_param (da8xx_fw_name, charp,S_IRUGO ); +module_param (da8xx_fw_name, charp,0444 );MODULE_PARM_DESC (da8xx_fw_name,"Name of DSP firmware file in /lib/firmware (if not specified defaults to 'rproc-dsp-fw')" );
Signature · 1 line
2.16.3
PATCH v5 7/8 remoteproc/davinci: use the reset framework
In reply to Bartosz GolaszewskiFrom: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
Switch to using the reset framework instead of handcoded reset routines we used so far.
--- drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
drivers/remoteproc/da8xx_remoteproc.c +29 -5
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@#include <linux/bitops.h> #include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/reset.h> #include <linux/err.h> #include <linux/interrupt.h> #include <linux/io.h>
@@ -20,8 +21,6 @@#include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/remoteproc.h> -#include <mach/clock.h> /* for davinci_clk_reset_assert/deassert() */ -#include "remoteproc_internal.h" static char *da8xx_fw_name;
@@ -72,6 +71,7 @@ struct da8xx_rproc {struct da8xx_rproc_mem *mem;int num_mems;struct clk *dsp_clk; +struct reset_control *dsp_reset;void (*ack_fxn)(struct irq_data *data);struct irq_data *irq_data;void __iomem *chipsig;
@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;struct da8xx_rproc *drproc = (struct da8xx_rproc *)rproc->priv;struct clk *dsp_clk = drproc->dsp_clk; +struct reset_control *dsp_reset = drproc->dsp_reset;int ret;/* hw requires the start (boot) address be on 1KB boundary */
@@ -155,7 +156,12 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)return ret; } -davinci_clk_reset_deassert (dsp_clk); + ret =reset_control_deassert (dsp_reset); +if (ret) { +dev_err (dev,"reset_control_deassert() failed: %d\n" , ret); +clk_disable_unprepare (dsp_clk); +return ret; + }return 0 ; }
@@ -163,8 +169,15 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)static int da8xx_rproc_stop (struct rproc *rproc) {struct da8xx_rproc *drproc = rproc->priv; +struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent; +int ret; + + ret =reset_control_assert (drproc->dsp_reset); +if (ret) { +dev_err (dev,"reset_control_assert() failed: %d\n" , ret); +return ret; + } -davinci_clk_reset_assert (drproc->dsp_clk);clk_disable_unprepare (drproc->dsp_clk);return 0 ;
@@ -232,6 +245,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)struct resource *bootreg_res;struct resource *chipsig_res;struct clk *dsp_clk; +struct reset_control *dsp_reset;void __iomem *chipsig;void __iomem *bootreg;int irq;
@@ -268,6 +282,15 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)return PTR_ERR (dsp_clk); } + dsp_reset =devm_reset_control_get_exclusive (dev,NULL ); +if (IS_ERR (dsp_reset)) { +if (PTR_ERR (dsp_reset) != -EPROBE_DEFER ) +dev_err (dev,"unable to get reset control: %ld\n" , +PTR_ERR (dsp_reset)); + +return PTR_ERR (dsp_reset); + } +if (dev->of_node) { ret =of_reserved_mem_device_init (dev);if (ret) {
@@ -287,6 +310,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) drproc = rproc->priv; drproc->rproc = rproc; drproc->dsp_clk = dsp_clk; + drproc->dsp_reset = dsp_reset; rproc->has_iommu = false; ret =da8xx_rproc_get_internal_memories (pdev, drproc);
@@ -309,7 +333,7 @@ static int da8xx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)* *not* in reset, but da8xx_rproc_start() needs the DSP to be * held in reset at the time it is called. */ - ret =davinci_clk_reset_assert (drproc->dsp_clk); + ret =reset_control_assert (dsp_reset);if (ret) goto free_rproc;
Signature · 1 line
2.16.3
PATCH v5 8/8 clk: davinci: kill davinci_clk_reset_assert/deassert()
In reply to Bartosz GolaszewskiFrom: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
This code is no longer used. Remove it.
--- arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/clock.h | 21 --------------------- drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c | 18 ------------------ 2 files changed, 39 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/clock.h
arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/clock.h deleted +0 -21
@@ -1,21 +0,0 @@ -/* -* arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/clock.h -* -* Clock control driver for DaVinci - header file -* -* Authors: Vladimir Barinov <[email protected]> -* -* 2007 (c) MontaVista Software, Inc. This file is licensed under -* the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2. This program -* is licensed "as is" without any warranty of any kind, whether express -* or implied. -*/ -#ifndef __ASM_ARCH_DAVINCI_CLOCK_H -#define __ASM_ARCH_DAVINCI_CLOCK_H - -struct clk ; - -int davinci_clk_reset_assert (struct clk *c); -int davinci_clk_reset_deassert (struct clk *c); - -#endif
drivers/clk/davinci/psc.c +0 -18
@@ -295,24 +295,6 @@ static int davinci_lpsc_clk_reset(struct clk *clk, bool reset)return 0 ; } -/* -* REVISIT: These exported functions can be removed after a non-DT lookup is -* added to the reset controller framework and the davinci-rproc driver is -* updated to use the generic reset controller framework. -*/ - -int davinci_clk_reset_assert (struct clk *clk) -{ -return davinci_lpsc_clk_reset (clk, true); -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL (davinci_clk_reset_assert); - -int davinci_clk_reset_deassert (struct clk *clk) -{ -return davinci_lpsc_clk_reset (clk, false); -} -EXPORT_SYMBOL (davinci_clk_reset_deassert); -static int davinci_psc_reset_assert (struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,unsigned long id) {
Signature · 1 line
2.16.3
Re: [PATCH v5 8/8] clk: davinci: kill davinci_clk_reset_assert/deassert()
Quoting Bartosz Golaszewski (2018-03-30 08:28:56)
Quoted 7 lines
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
This code is no longer used. Remove it.
Signed-off-by Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>Reviewed-by David Lechner <[email protected]>---
I'll try to remember, but please send this again if we need to apply it to the clk tree for 4.18.