UDP GSO Segmentation clean-ups
Subsystems (3)
v2 cover UDP GSO Segmentation clean-ups
This patch set addresses a number of issues I found while sorting out enabling UDP GSO Segmentation support for ixgbe/ixgbevf. Specifically there were a number of issues related to the checksum and such that seemed to cause either minor irregularities or kernel panics in the case of the offload request being allowed to traverse between name spaces.
With this set applied I am was able to get UDP GSO traffic to pass over vxlan tunnels in both offloaded modes and non-offloaded modes for ixgbe and ixgbevf.
I submitted the driver specific patches earlier as an RFC:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=42477&archive=both&state=*
v2: Updated patches based on feedback from Eric Dumazet
Split first patch into several patches based on feedback from Eric
---
Alexander Duyck (8):
udp: Record gso_segs when supporting UDP segmentation offload
udp: Verify that pulling UDP header in GSO segmentation doesn't fail
udp: Do not pass MSS as parameter to GSO segmentation
udp: Do not pass checksum as a parameter to GSO segmentation
udp: Partially unroll handling of first segment and last segment
udp: Add support for software checksum and GSO_PARTIAL with GSO offload
udp: Do not copy destructor if one is not present
net: Add NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4 to list of GSO offloads with fallback
include/linux/netdev_features.h | 3 + include/net/udp.h | 3 - net/ipv4/udp.c | 2 + net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- net/ipv6/udp_offload.c | 16 ------ 5 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
PATCH v2 1/8 udp: Record gso_segs when supporting UDP segmentation offload
From: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
We need to record the number of segments that will be generated when this frame is segmented. The expectation is that if gso_size is set then gso_segs is set as well. Without this some drivers such as ixgbe get confused if they attempt to offload this as they record 0 segments for the entire packet instead of the correct value.
--- net/ipv4/udp.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
net/ipv4/udp.c +2 -0
@@ -793,6 +793,8 @@ static int udp_send_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi4 *fl4,skb_shinfo (skb)->gso_size = cork->gso_size;skb_shinfo (skb)->gso_type =SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 ; +skb_shinfo (skb)->gso_segs =DIV_ROUND_UP (len -sizeof (uh), + cork->gso_size); goto csum_partial; }
Re: [net-next PATCH v2 1/8] udp: Record gso_segs when supporting UDP segmentation offload
Quoted 19 lines · Alexander Duyck
From: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
We need to record the number of segments that will be generated when this frame is segmented. The expectation is that if
gso_sizeis set thengso_segsis set as well. Without this some drivers such as ixgbe get confused if they attempt to offload this as they record 0 segments for the entire packet instead of the correct value.Reviewed-by Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>--- net/ipv4/udp.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)net/ipv4/udp.c +0
-0
net/ipv4/udp.c static int udp_send_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi4 *fl4, · line 799
Quoted 7 lines
net/ipv4/udp.c +2
-0@@ -793,6 +793,8 @@ static int udp_send_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct flowi4 *fl4,skb_shinfo (skb)->gso_size = cork->gso_size;skb_shinfo (skb)->gso_type =SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 ; +skb_shinfo (skb)->gso_segs =DIV_ROUND_UP (len -sizeof (uh), + cork->gso_size); goto csum_partial; }
But we have to be careful that both UDP GSO and UFO packets can traverse qdisc_pkt_len_init. This does seem to fix the UDP GSO case, as it adds the header size to each segment. But that is odd, as the code precedes UDP GSO, so must have been intended to estimate UFO size on the wire. Only external sources can generate UFO. It seems like we need to not add sizeof(struct udphdr) to hdrlen in the SKB_GSO_DODGY branch.
PATCH v2 2/8 udp: Verify that pulling UDP header in GSO segmentation doesn't fail
In reply to Alexander DuyckFrom: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
We should verify that we can pull the UDP header before we attempt to do so. Otherwise if this fails we have no way of knowing and GSO will not work correctly.
---
v2: New break-out patch based on one patch from earlier series
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +6 -3
@@ -191,14 +191,17 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,netdev_features_t features, unsigned int mss, __sum16 check) { + struct sk_buff *seg, *segs = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);struct sock *sk = gso_skb->sk;unsigned int sum_truesize =0 ; -struct sk_buff *segs, *seg;unsigned int hdrlen;struct udphdr *uh;if (gso_skb->len <=sizeof (*uh) + mss) -return ERR_PTR (-EINVAL ); + goto out; + +if (!pskb_may_pull (gso_skb,sizeof (*uh))) + goto out; hdrlen = gso_skb->data -skb_mac_header (gso_skb);skb_pull (gso_skb,sizeof (*uh));
@@ -230,7 +233,7 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb, }refcount_add (sum_truesize - gso_skb->truesize, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc); - +out:return segs; }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (__udp_gso_segment);
Re: [net-next PATCH v2 2/8] udp: Verify that pulling UDP header in GSO segmentation doesn't fail
Quoted 8 lines · Alexander Duyck
From: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
We should verify that we can pull the UDP header before we attempt to do so. Otherwise if this fails we have no way of knowing and GSO will not work correctly.
Signed-off-by Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>---
Willem de Bruijn
maintainerRe: [net-next PATCH v2 2/8] udp: Verify that pulling UDP header in GSO segmentation doesn't fail
In reply to Alexander DuyckQuoted 5 lines · Alexander Duyck
From: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
We should verify that we can pull the UDP header before we attempt to do so. Otherwise if this fails we have no way of knowing and GSO will not work correctly.
This already happened in the callers udp[46]_ufo_fragment
Re: [net-next PATCH v2 2/8] udp: Verify that pulling UDP header in GSO segmentation doesn't fail
Quoted 9 lines · Willem de Bruijn
Quoted 5 lines · Alexander Duyck
From: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
We should verify that we can pull the UDP header before we attempt to do so. Otherwise if this fails we have no way of knowing and GSO will not work correctly.
This already happened in the callers udp[46]_ufo_fragment
Ah. Okay I didn't see that. I may add a comment somewhere indicating that is the case as it is a bit buried with all the calls.
Thanks.
- Alex
PATCH v2 3/8 udp: Do not pass MSS as parameter to GSO segmentation
In reply to Alexander DuyckFrom: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
There is no point in passing MSS as a parameter for for the GSO segmentation call as it is already available via the shared info for the skb itself.
---
v2: New break-out patch based on one patch from earlier series
include/net/udp.h | 2 +- net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 6 ++++-- net/ipv6/udp_offload.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
include/net/udp.h +1 -1
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ struct sk_buff **udp_gro_receive(struct sk_buff **head, struct sk_buff *skb,struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment (struct sk_buff *gso_skb,netdev_features_t features, -unsigned int mss,__sum16 check); +__sum16 check);static inline struct udphdr *udp_gro_udphdr (struct sk_buff *skb) {
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +4 -2
@@ -189,14 +189,16 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_udp_tunnel_segment(struct sk_buff *skb,struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment (struct sk_buff *gso_skb,netdev_features_t features, -unsigned int mss,__sum16 check) +__sum16 check) {struct sk_buff *seg, *segs =ERR_PTR (-EINVAL );struct sock *sk = gso_skb->sk;unsigned int sum_truesize =0 ;unsigned int hdrlen;struct udphdr *uh; +unsigned int mss; + mss =skb_shinfo (gso_skb)->gso_size;if (gso_skb->len <=sizeof (*uh) + mss) goto out;
@@ -247,7 +249,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *__udp4_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,if (!can_checksum_protocol (features,htons (ETH_P_IP )))return ERR_PTR (-EIO ); -return __udp_gso_segment (gso_skb, features, mss, +return __udp_gso_segment (gso_skb, features,udp_v4_check (sizeof (struct udphdr ) + mss, iph->saddr, iph->daddr,0 )); }
net/ipv6/udp_offload.c +1 -1
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *__udp6_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,if (!can_checksum_protocol (features,htons (ETH_P_IPV6 )))return ERR_PTR (-EIO ); -return __udp_gso_segment (gso_skb, features, mss, +return __udp_gso_segment (gso_skb, features,udp_v6_check (sizeof (struct udphdr ) + mss, &ip6h->saddr, &ip6h->daddr,0 )); }
Re: [net-next PATCH v2 3/8] udp: Do not pass MSS as parameter to GSO segmentation
Quoted 8 lines · Alexander Duyck
From: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
There is no point in passing MSS as a parameter for for the GSO segmentation call as it is already available via the shared info for the skb itself.
Signed-off-by Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>---
Re: [net-next PATCH v2 3/8] udp: Do not pass MSS as parameter to GSO segmentation
Quoted 5 lines · Eric Dumazet
Quoted 2 lines · Alexander Duyck
From: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
There is no point in passing MSS as a parameter for for the GSO segmentation call as it is already available via the shared info for the skb itself.
Signed-off-by Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>---
Reviewed-by Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
PATCH v2 4/8 udp: Do not pass checksum as a parameter to GSO segmentation
In reply to Alexander DuyckFrom: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
This patch is meant to allow us to avoid having to recompute the checksum from scratch and have it passed as a parameter.
Instead of taking that approach we can take advantage of the fact that the length that was used to compute the existing checksum is included in the UDP header. If we cancel that out by adding the value XOR with 0xFFFF we can then just add the new length in and fold that into the new result.
I think this may be fixing a checksum bug in the original code as well since the checksum that was passed included the UDP header in the checksum computation, but then excluded it for the adjustment on the last frame. I believe this may have an effect on things in the cases where the two differ by bits that would result in things crossing the byte boundaries.
---
v2: New break-out patch based on one patch from earlier series
include/net/udp.h | 3 +-- net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------- net/ipv6/udp_offload.c | 7 +------ 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
include/net/udp.h +1 -2
@@ -175,8 +175,7 @@ struct sk_buff **udp_gro_receive(struct sk_buff **head, struct sk_buff *skb,int udp_gro_complete (struct sk_buff *skb,int nhoff,udp_lookup_t lookup);struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment (struct sk_buff *gso_skb, -netdev_features_t features, -__sum16 check); +netdev_features_t features);static inline struct udphdr *udp_gro_udphdr (struct sk_buff *skb) {
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +21 -14
@@ -188,8 +188,7 @@ struct sk_buff *skb_udp_tunnel_segment(struct sk_buff *skb,EXPORT_SYMBOL (skb_udp_tunnel_segment);struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment (struct sk_buff *gso_skb, -netdev_features_t features, -__sum16 check) +netdev_features_t features) {struct sk_buff *seg, *segs =ERR_PTR (-EINVAL );struct sock *sk = gso_skb->sk;
@@ -197,6 +196,8 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,unsigned int hdrlen;struct udphdr *uh;unsigned int mss; +__sum16 check; +__be16 newlen; mss =skb_shinfo (gso_skb)->gso_size;if (gso_skb->len <=sizeof (*uh) + mss)
@@ -218,17 +219,28 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,return segs; } + uh =udp_hdr (segs); + +/* compute checksum adjustment based on old length versus new */ + newlen =htons (sizeof (*uh) + mss); + check = ~csum_fold ((__force __wsum)((__force u32 )uh->check + + ((__force u32 )uh->len ^0xFFFF ) + + (__force u32 )newlen)); +for (seg = segs; seg; seg = seg->next) { uh =udp_hdr (seg); - uh->len =htons (seg->len - hdrlen); - uh->check = check;/* last packet can be partial gso_size */ -if (!seg->next) -csum_replace2 (&uh->check,htons (mss), -htons (seg->len - hdrlen -sizeof (*uh))); +if (!seg->next) { + newlen =htons (seg->len - hdrlen); + check = ~csum_fold ((__force __wsum)((__force u32 )uh->check + + ((__force u32 )uh->len ^0xFFFF ) + + (__force u32 )newlen)); + } + + uh->len = newlen; + uh->check = check; - uh->check = ~uh->check; seg->destructor = sock_wfree; seg->sk = sk; sum_truesize += seg->truesize;
@@ -243,15 +255,10 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,static struct sk_buff *__udp4_gso_segment (struct sk_buff *gso_skb,netdev_features_t features) { -const struct iphdr *iph =ip_hdr (gso_skb); -unsigned int mss =skb_shinfo (gso_skb)->gso_size; -if (!can_checksum_protocol (features,htons (ETH_P_IP )))return ERR_PTR (-EIO ); -return __udp_gso_segment (gso_skb, features, -udp_v4_check (sizeof (struct udphdr ) + mss, - iph->saddr, iph->daddr,0 )); +return __udp_gso_segment (gso_skb, features); } static struct sk_buff *udp4_ufo_fragment(struct sk_buff *skb,
net/ipv6/udp_offload.c +1 -6
@@ -20,15 +20,10 @@static struct sk_buff *__udp6_gso_segment (struct sk_buff *gso_skb,netdev_features_t features) { -const struct ipv6hdr *ip6h =ipv6_hdr (gso_skb); -unsigned int mss =skb_shinfo (gso_skb)->gso_size; -if (!can_checksum_protocol (features,htons (ETH_P_IPV6 )))return ERR_PTR (-EIO ); -return __udp_gso_segment (gso_skb, features, -udp_v6_check (sizeof (struct udphdr ) + mss, - &ip6h->saddr, &ip6h->daddr,0 )); +return __udp_gso_segment (gso_skb, features); } static struct sk_buff *udp6_ufo_fragment(struct sk_buff *skb,
Re: [net-next PATCH v2 4/8] udp: Do not pass checksum as a parameter to GSO segmentation
Quoted 12 lines · Alexander Duyck
From: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
This patch is meant to allow us to avoid having to recompute the checksum from scratch and have it passed as a parameter.
Instead of taking that approach we can take advantage of the fact that the length that was used to compute the existing checksum is included in the UDP header. If we cancel that out by adding the value XOR with
0xFFFFwe can then just add the new length in and fold that into the new result.
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb, · line 229
Quoted 8 lines
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +8
-0+ uh =udp_hdr (segs); + +/* compute checksum adjustment based on old length versus new */ + newlen =htons (sizeof (*uh) + mss); + check = ~csum_fold ((__force __wsum)((__force u32 )uh->check + + ((__force u32 )uh->len ^0xFFFF ) + + (__force u32 )newlen)); +
Can't this use csum_sub() instead of this ^ 0xFFFF trick ?
Re: [net-next PATCH v2 4/8] udp: Do not pass checksum as a parameter to GSO segmentation
Quoted 15 lines · Eric Dumazet
Quoted 12 lines · Alexander Duyck
From: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
This patch is meant to allow us to avoid having to recompute the checksum from scratch and have it passed as a parameter.
Instead of taking that approach we can take advantage of the fact that the length that was used to compute the existing checksum is included in the UDP header. If we cancel that out by adding the value XOR with
0xFFFFwe can then just add the new length in and fold that into the new result.
Quoted 11 lines
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb, · line 229
Quoted 8 lines
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +8
-0+ uh =udp_hdr (segs); + +/* compute checksum adjustment based on old length versus new */ + newlen =htons (sizeof (*uh) + mss); + check = ~csum_fold ((__force __wsum)((__force u32 )uh->check + + ((__force u32 )uh->len ^0xFFFF ) + + (__force u32 )newlen)); +Can't this use
csum_sub()instead of this ^0xFFFFtrick ?
I could but that actually adds more instructions to all this since csum_sub will perform the inversion across a 32b checksum when we only need to bitflip a 16 bit value. I had considered doing (u16)(~uh->len) but thought type casing it more than once would be a pain as well.
What I wanted to avoid is having to do the extra math to account for the rollover. Adding 3 16 bit values will result in at most a 18 bit value which can then be folded. Doing it this way we avoid that extra add w/ carry logic that is needed for csum_add/sub.
Willem de Bruijn
maintainerRe: [net-next PATCH v2 4/8] udp: Do not pass checksum as a parameter to GSO segmentation
In reply to Alexander DuyckQuoted 10 lines · Alexander Duyck
From: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
This patch is meant to allow us to avoid having to recompute the checksum from scratch and have it passed as a parameter.
Instead of taking that approach we can take advantage of the fact that the length that was used to compute the existing checksum is included in the UDP header. If we cancel that out by adding the value XOR with
0xFFFFwe can then just add the new length in and fold that into the new result.
Quoted 5 lines
I think this may be fixing a checksum bug in the original code as well since the checksum that was passed included the UDP header in the checksum computation, but then excluded it for the adjustment on the last frame. I believe this may have an effect on things in the cases where the two differ by bits that would result in things crossing the byte boundaries.
The replacement code, below, subtracts original payload size then adds the new payload size. mss here excludes the udp header size.
Quoted 4 lines
/* last packet can be partial gso_size */net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +0
-3-if (!seg->next) -csum_replace2 (&uh->check,htons (mss), -htons (seg->len - hdrlen -sizeof (*uh)));
Re: [net-next PATCH v2 4/8] udp: Do not pass checksum as a parameter to GSO segmentation
Quoted 12 lines · Willem de Bruijn
Quoted 10 lines · Alexander Duyck
From: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
This patch is meant to allow us to avoid having to recompute the checksum from scratch and have it passed as a parameter.
Instead of taking that approach we can take advantage of the fact that the length that was used to compute the existing checksum is included in the UDP header. If we cancel that out by adding the value XOR with
0xFFFFwe can then just add the new length in and fold that into the new result.
Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 5 lines
I think this may be fixing a checksum bug in the original code as well since the checksum that was passed included the UDP header in the checksum computation, but then excluded it for the adjustment on the last frame. I believe this may have an effect on things in the cases where the two differ by bits that would result in things crossing the byte boundaries.
The replacement code, below, subtracts original payload size then adds the new payload size. mss here excludes the udp header size.
Quoted 4 lines
/* last packet can be partial gso_size */net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +0
-3-if (!seg->next) -csum_replace2 (&uh->check,htons (mss), -htons (seg->len - hdrlen -sizeof (*uh)));
That is my point. When you calculated your checksum you included the UDP header in the calculation.
- return __udp_gso_segment(gso_skb, features,
- udp_v4_check(sizeof(struct udphdr) + mss,
- iph->saddr, iph->daddr, 0));
Basically the problem is in one spot you are adding the sizeof(struct udphdr) + mss and then in another you are cancelling it out as mss and trying to account for it by also dropping the UDP header from the payload length of the value you are adding. That works in the cases where the effect doesn't cause any issues with the byte ordering, however I think when mss + 8 crosses a byte boundary it can lead to issues since the calculation is done on a byte swapped value.
Willem de Bruijn
maintainerRe: [net-next PATCH v2 4/8] udp: Do not pass checksum as a parameter to GSO segmentation
Quoted 35 lines · Alexander Duyck
Quoted 12 lines · Willem de Bruijn
Quoted 10 lines · Alexander Duyck
From: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
This patch is meant to allow us to avoid having to recompute the checksum from scratch and have it passed as a parameter.
Instead of taking that approach we can take advantage of the fact that the length that was used to compute the existing checksum is included in the UDP header. If we cancel that out by adding the value XOR with
0xFFFFwe can then just add the new length in and fold that into the new result.Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 5 lines
I think this may be fixing a checksum bug in the original code as well since the checksum that was passed included the UDP header in the checksum computation, but then excluded it for the adjustment on the last frame. I believe this may have an effect on things in the cases where the two differ by bits that would result in things crossing the byte boundaries.
The replacement code, below, subtracts original payload size then adds the new payload size. mss here excludes the udp header size.
Quoted 4 lines
/* last packet can be partial gso_size */net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +0
-3-if (!seg->next) -csum_replace2 (&uh->check,htons (mss), -htons (seg->len - hdrlen -sizeof (*uh)));That is my point. When you calculated your checksum you included the UDP header in the calculation.
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +0
-3-return __udp_gso_segment (gso_skb, features, -udp_v4_check (sizeof (struct udphdr ) + mss, - iph->saddr, iph->daddr,0 ));
Quoted 7 lines
Basically the problem is in one spot you are adding the sizeof(struct udphdr) + mss and then in another you are cancelling it out as mss and trying to account for it by also dropping the UDP header from the payload length of the value you are adding. That works in the cases where the effect doesn't cause any issues with the byte ordering, however I think when mss + 8 crosses a byte boundary it can lead to issues since the calculation is done on a byte swapped value.
Do you mean that the issue is that the arithmetic operations on a __be16 in csum_replace2 may be incorrect if they exceed the least significant byte?
csum_replace2 is used in many locations in the stack to adjust a network byte order csum when the payload length changes (e.g., iph->tot_len in inet_gro_complete).
Or am I missing something specific about the udphdr calculations?
Re: [net-next PATCH v2 4/8] udp: Do not pass checksum as a parameter to GSO segmentation
Quoted 49 lines · Willem de Bruijn
Quoted 35 lines · Alexander Duyck
Quoted 12 lines · Willem de Bruijn
Quoted 10 lines · Alexander Duyck
From: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
This patch is meant to allow us to avoid having to recompute the checksum from scratch and have it passed as a parameter.
Instead of taking that approach we can take advantage of the fact that the length that was used to compute the existing checksum is included in the UDP header. If we cancel that out by adding the value XOR with
0xFFFFwe can then just add the new length in and fold that into the new result.Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 5 lines
I think this may be fixing a checksum bug in the original code as well since the checksum that was passed included the UDP header in the checksum computation, but then excluded it for the adjustment on the last frame. I believe this may have an effect on things in the cases where the two differ by bits that would result in things crossing the byte boundaries.
The replacement code, below, subtracts original payload size then adds the new payload size. mss here excludes the udp header size.
Quoted 4 lines
/* last packet can be partial gso_size */net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +0
-3-if (!seg->next) -csum_replace2 (&uh->check,htons (mss), -htons (seg->len - hdrlen -sizeof (*uh)));That is my point. When you calculated your checksum you included the UDP header in the calculation.
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +0
-3-return __udp_gso_segment (gso_skb, features, -udp_v4_check (sizeof (struct udphdr ) + mss, - iph->saddr, iph->daddr,0 ));Quoted 7 lines
Basically the problem is in one spot you are adding the sizeof(struct udphdr) + mss and then in another you are cancelling it out as mss and trying to account for it by also dropping the UDP header from the payload length of the value you are adding. That works in the cases where the effect doesn't cause any issues with the byte ordering, however I think when mss + 8 crosses a byte boundary it can lead to issues since the calculation is done on a byte swapped value.
Do you mean that the issue is that the arithmetic operations on a
__be16incsum_replace2may be incorrect if they exceed the least significant byte?
Quoted 5 lines
csum_replace2is used in many locations in the stack to adjust a network byte order csum when the payload length changes (e.g.,iph->tot_lenininet_gro_complete).Or am I missing something specific about the udphdr calculations?
Actually it looks like the math I was applying to test this was off.
Basically the part I wasn't a fan of is the fact that we account for the UDP header in the first calculation but not in the next. I guess in the grand scheme of things though you are just dropping it from both the value being removed and the value being added so it works out do to the fact that the checksum can be associative.
I guess I was just being too literal in my thinking. Still an expensive way of doing this though. I'll update the patch description.
Thanks.
- Alex
PATCH v2 5/8 udp: Partially unroll handling of first segment and last segment
In reply to Alexander DuyckFrom: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
This patch allows us to take care of unrolling the first segment and the last segment of the loop for processing the segmented skb. Part of the motivation for this is that it makes it easier to process the fact that the first fame and all of the frames in between should be mostly identical in terms of header data, and the last frame has differences in the length and partial checksum.
In addition I am dropping the header length calculation since we don't really need it for anything but the last frame and it can be easily obtained by just pulling the data_len and offset of tail from the transport header.
---
v2: New break-out patch based on one patch from earlier series
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +20 -15
@@ -193,7 +193,6 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,struct sk_buff *seg, *segs =ERR_PTR (-EINVAL );struct sock *sk = gso_skb->sk;unsigned int sum_truesize =0 ; -unsigned int hdrlen;struct udphdr *uh;unsigned int mss;__sum16 check;
@@ -206,7 +205,6 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,if (!pskb_may_pull (gso_skb,sizeof (*uh))) goto out; - hdrlen = gso_skb->data -skb_mac_header (gso_skb);skb_pull (gso_skb,sizeof (*uh));/* clear destructor to avoid skb_segment assigning it to tail */
@@ -219,7 +217,8 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,return segs; } - uh =udp_hdr (segs); + seg = segs; + uh =udp_hdr (seg);/* compute checksum adjustment based on old length versus new */ newlen =htons (sizeof (*uh) + mss);
@@ -227,25 +226,31 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb, ((__force u32 )uh->len ^0xFFFF ) + (__force u32)newlen)); -for (seg = segs; seg; seg = seg->next) { - uh =udp_hdr (seg); +for (;;) { + seg->destructor = sock_wfree; + seg->sk = sk; + sum_truesize += seg->truesize; -/* last packet can be partial gso_size */ -if (!seg->next) { - newlen =htons (seg->len - hdrlen); - check = ~csum_fold ((__force __wsum)((__force u32 )uh->check + - ((__force u32 )uh->len ^0xFFFF ) + - (__force u32 )newlen)); - } +if (!seg->next) +break ; uh->len = newlen; uh->check = check; - seg->destructor = sock_wfree; - seg->sk = sk; - sum_truesize += seg->truesize; + seg = seg->next; + uh =udp_hdr (seg); } +/* last packet can be partial gso_size, account for that in checksum */ + newlen =htons (skb_tail_pointer (seg) -skb_transport_header (seg) + + seg->data_len); + check = ~csum_fold ((__force __wsum)((__force u32 )uh->check + + ((__force u32 )uh->len ^0xFFFF ) + + (__force u32 )newlen)); + uh->len = newlen; + uh->check = check; + +/* update refcount for the packet */ refcount_add (sum_truesize - gso_skb->truesize, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc); out:return segs;
Willem de Bruijn
maintainerRe: [net-next PATCH v2 5/8] udp: Partially unroll handling of first segment and last segment
Quoted 4 lines · Alexander Duyck
From: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
This patch allows us to take care of unrolling the first segment and the last segment
Only the last segment needs to be unrolled, right?
Quoted 59 lines
of the loop for processing the segmented skb. Part of the motivation for this is that it makes it easier to process the fact that the first fame and all of the frames in between should be mostly identical in terms of header data, and the last frame has differences in the length and partial checksum.
In addition I am dropping the header length calculation since we don't really need it for anything but the last frame and it can be easily obtained by just pulling the
data_lenand offset of tail from the transport header.Signed-off-by Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>---
v2: New break-out patch based on one patch from earlier series
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +6
-5@@ -193,7 +193,6 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,struct sk_buff *seg, *segs =ERR_PTR (-EINVAL );struct sock *sk = gso_skb->sk;unsigned int sum_truesize =0 ; -unsigned int hdrlen;struct udphdr *uh;unsigned int mss;__sum16 check;@@ -206,7 +205,6 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,if (!pskb_may_pull (gso_skb,sizeof (*uh))) goto out; - hdrlen = gso_skb->data -skb_mac_header (gso_skb);skb_pull (gso_skb,sizeof (*uh));/* clear destructor to avoid skb_segment assigning it to tail */ @@ -219,7 +217,8 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,return segs; } - uh =udp_hdr (segs); + seg = segs; + uh =udp_hdr (seg);/* compute checksum adjustment based on old length versus new */ newlen =htons (sizeof (*uh) + mss);@@ -227,25 +226,31 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb, ((__force u32 )uh->len ^0xFFFF ) + (__force u32)newlen)); -for (seg = segs; seg; seg = seg->next) { - uh =udp_hdr (seg); +for (;;) { + seg->destructor = sock_wfree; + seg->sk = sk; + sum_truesize += seg->truesize;
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb, · line 235
Quoted 10 lines
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +2
-7-/* last packet can be partial gso_size */ -if (!seg->next) { - newlen =htons (seg->len - hdrlen); - check = ~csum_fold ((__force __wsum)((__force u32 )uh->check + - ((__force u32 )uh->len ^0xFFFF ) + - (__force u32 )newlen)); - } +if (!seg->next) +break ;
Not critical, but I find replacing
for (seg = segs; seg; seg = seg->next) {
uh = udp_hdr(seg);
...
}with
uh = udp_hdr(seg);
for (;;) {
...
if (!seg->next)
break;uh = udp_hdr(seg);
}
much less easy to parse and it inflates patch size. How about just
- for (seg = segs; seg; seg = seg->next)
+ for( seg = segs; seg->next; seg = seg->next)
Quoted 25 lines
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +12
-3uh->len = newlen; uh->check = check; - seg->destructor = sock_wfree; - seg->sk = sk; - sum_truesize += seg->truesize; + seg = seg->next; + uh =udp_hdr (seg); } +/* last packet can be partial gso_size, account for that in checksum */ + newlen =htons (skb_tail_pointer (seg) -skb_transport_header (seg) + + seg->data_len); + check = ~csum_fold ((__force __wsum)((__force u32 )uh->check + + ((__force u32 )uh->len ^0xFFFF ) + + (__force u32 )newlen)); + uh->len = newlen; + uh->check = check; + +/* update refcount for the packet */ refcount_add (sum_truesize - gso_skb->truesize, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc); out:return segs;
Re: [net-next PATCH v2 5/8] udp: Partially unroll handling of first segment and last segment
Quoted 8 lines · Willem de Bruijn
Quoted 4 lines · Alexander Duyck
From: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
This patch allows us to take care of unrolling the first segment and the last segment
Only the last segment needs to be unrolled, right?
I need the first segment as I have to get access to the UDP header to recompute what the checksum should actually be for the first frame and all the frames in between.
Quoted 85 lines
Quoted 59 lines
of the loop for processing the segmented skb. Part of the motivation for this is that it makes it easier to process the fact that the first fame and all of the frames in between should be mostly identical in terms of header data, and the last frame has differences in the length and partial checksum.
In addition I am dropping the header length calculation since we don't really need it for anything but the last frame and it can be easily obtained by just pulling the
data_lenand offset of tail from the transport header.Signed-off-by Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>---
v2: New break-out patch based on one patch from earlier series
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +6
-5@@ -193,7 +193,6 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,struct sk_buff *seg, *segs =ERR_PTR (-EINVAL );struct sock *sk = gso_skb->sk;unsigned int sum_truesize =0 ; -unsigned int hdrlen;struct udphdr *uh;unsigned int mss;__sum16 check;@@ -206,7 +205,6 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,if (!pskb_may_pull (gso_skb,sizeof (*uh))) goto out; - hdrlen = gso_skb->data -skb_mac_header (gso_skb);skb_pull (gso_skb,sizeof (*uh));/* clear destructor to avoid skb_segment assigning it to tail */ @@ -219,7 +217,8 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,return segs; } - uh =udp_hdr (segs); + seg = segs; + uh =udp_hdr (seg);/* compute checksum adjustment based on old length versus new */ newlen =htons (sizeof (*uh) + mss);@@ -227,25 +226,31 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb, ((__force u32 )uh->len ^0xFFFF ) + (__force u32)newlen)); -for (seg = segs; seg; seg = seg->next) { - uh =udp_hdr (seg); +for (;;) { + seg->destructor = sock_wfree; + seg->sk = sk; + sum_truesize += seg->truesize;net/ipv4/udp_offload.c struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb, · line 235
Quoted 10 lines
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +2
-7-/* last packet can be partial gso_size */ -if (!seg->next) { - newlen =htons (seg->len - hdrlen); - check = ~csum_fold ((__force __wsum)((__force u32 )uh->check + - ((__force u32 )uh->len ^0xFFFF ) + - (__force u32 )newlen)); - } +if (!seg->next) +break ;Not critical, but I find replacing
for (seg = segs; seg; seg = seg->next) { uh = udp_hdr(seg); ... }with
uh = udp_hdr(seg); for (;;) { ... if (!seg->next) break;
Quoted 9 lines
uh = udp_hdr(seg);}
much less easy to parse and it inflates patch size. How about just
- for (seg = segs; seg; seg =
seg->next)
+for( seg = segs; seg->next; seg = seg->next)
The problem is I need access to the UDP header before I start the loop. That was why I pulled seg = segs and the "uh = udp_hdr(seg)" out seperately
Quoted 25 lines
Quoted 25 lines
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +12
-3uh->len = newlen; uh->check = check; - seg->destructor = sock_wfree; - seg->sk = sk; - sum_truesize += seg->truesize; + seg = seg->next; + uh =udp_hdr (seg); } +/* last packet can be partial gso_size, account for that in checksum */ + newlen =htons (skb_tail_pointer (seg) -skb_transport_header (seg) + + seg->data_len); + check = ~csum_fold ((__force __wsum)((__force u32 )uh->check + + ((__force u32 )uh->len ^0xFFFF ) + + (__force u32 )newlen)); + uh->len = newlen; + uh->check = check; + +/* update refcount for the packet */ refcount_add (sum_truesize - gso_skb->truesize, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc); out:return segs;
PATCH v2 6/8 udp: Add support for software checksum and GSO_PARTIAL with GSO offload
In reply to Alexander DuyckFrom: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
This patch adds support for a software provided checksum and GSO_PARTIAL segmentation support. With this we can offload UDP segmentation on devices that only have partial support for tunnels.
Since we are no longer needing the hardware checksum we can drop the checks in the segmentation code that were verifying if it was present.
--- net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++---------- net/ipv6/udp_offload.c | 11 +---------- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +18 -10
@@ -217,6 +217,13 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,return segs; } +/* GSO partial and frag_list segmentation only requires splitting +* the frame into an MSS multiple and possibly a remainder, both +* cases return a GSO skb. So update the mss now. +*/ +if (skb_is_gso (segs)) + mss *=skb_shinfo (segs)->gso_segs; + seg = segs; uh =udp_hdr (seg);
@@ -237,6 +244,11 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb, uh->len = newlen; uh->check = check; +if (seg->ip_summed ==CHECKSUM_PARTIAL ) +gso_reset_checksum (seg, ~check); +else + uh->check =gso_make_checksum (seg, ~check); + seg = seg->next; uh =udp_hdr (seg); }
@@ -250,6 +262,11 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb, uh->len = newlen; uh->check = check; +if (seg->ip_summed ==CHECKSUM_PARTIAL ) +gso_reset_checksum (seg, ~check); +else + uh->check =gso_make_checksum (seg, ~check); +/* update refcount for the packet */ refcount_add (sum_truesize - gso_skb->truesize, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc); out:
@@ -257,15 +274,6 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb, }EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL (__udp_gso_segment); -static struct sk_buff *__udp4_gso_segment (struct sk_buff *gso_skb, -netdev_features_t features) -{ -if (!can_checksum_protocol (features,htons (ETH_P_IP ))) -return ERR_PTR (-EIO ); - -return __udp_gso_segment (gso_skb, features); -} -static struct sk_buff *udp4_ufo_fragment (struct sk_buff *skb,netdev_features_t features) {
@@ -289,7 +297,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *udp4_ufo_fragment(struct sk_buff *skb, goto out;if (skb_shinfo (skb)->gso_type &SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 ) -return __udp4_gso_segment (skb, features); +return __udp_gso_segment (skb, features); mss =skb_shinfo (skb)->gso_size;if (unlikely (skb->len <= mss))
net/ipv6/udp_offload.c +1 -10
@@ -17,15 +17,6 @@#include <net/ip6_checksum.h> #include "ip6_offload.h" -static struct sk_buff *__udp6_gso_segment (struct sk_buff *gso_skb, -netdev_features_t features) -{ -if (!can_checksum_protocol (features,htons (ETH_P_IPV6 ))) -return ERR_PTR (-EIO ); - -return __udp_gso_segment (gso_skb, features); -} -static struct sk_buff *udp6_ufo_fragment (struct sk_buff *skb,netdev_features_t features) {
@@ -58,7 +49,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *udp6_ufo_fragment(struct sk_buff *skb, goto out;if (skb_shinfo (skb)->gso_type &SKB_GSO_UDP_L4 ) -return __udp6_gso_segment (skb, features); +return __udp_gso_segment (skb, features);/* Do software UFO. Complete and fill in the UDP checksum as HW cannot * do checksum of UDP packets sent as multiple IP fragments.
Willem de Bruijn
maintainerRe: [net-next PATCH v2 6/8] udp: Add support for software checksum and GSO_PARTIAL with GSO offload
Quoted 34 lines · Alexander Duyck
From: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
This patch adds support for a software provided checksum and
GSO_PARTIALsegmentation support. With this we can offload UDP segmentation on devices that only have partial support for tunnels.Since we are no longer needing the hardware checksum we can drop the checks in the segmentation code that were verifying if it was present.
Signed-off-by Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>--- net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++---------- net/ipv6/udp_offload.c | 11 +---------- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +7
-0@@ -217,6 +217,13 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,return segs; } +/* GSO partial and frag_list segmentation only requires splitting +* the frame into an MSS multiple and possibly a remainder, both +* cases return a GSO skb. So update the mss now. +*/ +if (skb_is_gso (segs)) + mss *=skb_shinfo (segs)->gso_segs; + seg = segs; uh =udp_hdr (seg);
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb, · line 250
Quoted 7 lines
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +4
-0@@ -237,6 +244,11 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb, uh->len = newlen; uh->check = check; +if (seg->ip_summed ==CHECKSUM_PARTIAL ) +gso_reset_checksum (seg, ~check); +else + uh->check =gso_make_checksum (seg, ~check);
Here and below, this needs
if (uh->check == 0)
uh->check = CSUM_MANGLED_0;similar to __skb_udp_tunnel_segment?
Re: [net-next PATCH v2 6/8] udp: Add support for software checksum and GSO_PARTIAL with GSO offload
Quoted 46 lines · Willem de Bruijn
Quoted 34 lines · Alexander Duyck
From: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
This patch adds support for a software provided checksum and
GSO_PARTIALsegmentation support. With this we can offload UDP segmentation on devices that only have partial support for tunnels.Since we are no longer needing the hardware checksum we can drop the checks in the segmentation code that were verifying if it was present.
Signed-off-by Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>--- net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++---------- net/ipv6/udp_offload.c | 11 +---------- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +7
-0@@ -217,6 +217,13 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,return segs; } +/* GSO partial and frag_list segmentation only requires splitting +* the frame into an MSS multiple and possibly a remainder, both +* cases return a GSO skb. So update the mss now. +*/ +if (skb_is_gso (segs)) + mss *=skb_shinfo (segs)->gso_segs; + seg = segs; uh =udp_hdr (seg);net/ipv4/udp_offload.c struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb, · line 250
Quoted 7 lines
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +4
-0@@ -237,6 +244,11 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb, uh->len = newlen; uh->check = check; +if (seg->ip_summed ==CHECKSUM_PARTIAL ) +gso_reset_checksum (seg, ~check); +else + uh->check =gso_make_checksum (seg, ~check);Here and below, this needs
Quoted 4 lines
if (uh->check == 0) uh->check = CSUM_MANGLED_0;similar to
__skb_udp_tunnel_segment?
Good call, though I think I might change this up a bit and do something like:uh->check = gso_make_checksum(seg, ~check) ? : CSUM_MANGLED_0;
That way I can avoid the extra read.
Thanks.
- Alex
PATCH v2 7/8 udp: Do not copy destructor if one is not present
In reply to Alexander DuyckFrom: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
This patch makes it so that if a destructor is not present we avoid trying to update the skb socket or any reference counting that would be associated with the NULL socket and/or descriptor. By doing this we can support traffic coming from another namespace without any issues.
---
v2: Do not overwrite destructor if not sock_wfree as per Eric
Drop WARN_ON as per Eric
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 21 ++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c +14 -7
@@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,unsigned int sum_truesize =0 ;struct udphdr *uh;unsigned int mss; +bool copy_dtor;__sum16 check;__be16 newlen;
@@ -208,12 +209,14 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb,skb_pull (gso_skb,sizeof (*uh));/* clear destructor to avoid skb_segment assigning it to tail */ -WARN_ON_ONCE (gso_skb->destructor != sock_wfree); - gso_skb->destructor =NULL ; + copy_dtor = gso_skb->destructor == sock_wfree; +if (copy_dtor) + gso_skb->destructor =NULL ; segs =skb_segment (gso_skb, features);if (unlikely (IS_ERR_OR_NULL (segs))) { - gso_skb->destructor = sock_wfree; +if (copy_dtor) + gso_skb->destructor = sock_wfree;return segs; }
@@ -234,9 +237,11 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb, (__force u32)newlen));for (;;) { - seg->destructor = sock_wfree; - seg->sk = sk; - sum_truesize += seg->truesize; +if (copy_dtor) { + seg->destructor = sock_wfree; + seg->sk = sk; + sum_truesize += seg->truesize; + }if (!seg->next)break ;
@@ -268,7 +273,9 @@ struct sk_buff *__udp_gso_segment(struct sk_buff *gso_skb, uh->check =gso_make_checksum (seg, ~check);/* update refcount for the packet */ -refcount_add (sum_truesize - gso_skb->truesize, &sk->sk_wmem_alloc); +if (copy_dtor) +refcount_add (sum_truesize - gso_skb->truesize, + &sk->sk_wmem_alloc); out:return segs; }
Re: [net-next PATCH v2 7/8] udp: Do not copy destructor if one is not present
Quoted 8 lines · Alexander Duyck
From: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
This patch makes it so that if a destructor is not present we avoid trying to update the skb socket or any reference counting that would be associated with the NULL socket and/or descriptor. By doing this we can support traffic coming from another namespace without any issues.
Signed-off-by Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
PATCH v2 8/8 net: Add NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4 to list of GSO offloads with fallback
In reply to Alexander DuyckFrom: Alexander Duyck <[email protected]>
Enable UDP offload as a generic software offload since we can now handle it for multiple cases including if the checksum isn't present and via gso_partial in the case of tunnels.
--- include/linux/netdev_features.h | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
include/linux/netdev_features.h +2 -1
@@ -184,7 +184,8 @@ enum {/* List of features with software fallbacks. */ #define NETIF_F_GSO_SOFTWARE (NETIF_F_ALL_TSO | \ - NETIF_F_GSO_SCTP) + NETIF_F_GSO_SCTP| \ + NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4)/* * If one device supports one of these features, then enable them
Willem de Bruijn
maintainerQuoted 5 lines · Alexander Duyck
This patch set addresses a number of issues I found while sorting out enabling UDP GSO Segmentation support for ixgbe/ixgbevf. Specifically there were a number of issues related to the checksum and such that seemed to cause either minor irregularities or kernel panics in the case of the offload request being allowed to traverse between name spaces.
Were you able to traverse GSO packets between network namespace before adding to NETIF_F_GSO_SOFTWARE? It does appear that veth includes NETIF_F_GSO_ENCAP_ALL, which also allows GSO.
In either case, it should not be possible for GSO packets to arrive on a veth device, as that can result in queuing the GSO packet to a recipient socket. In this regard veth is like loopback and must exclude GSO support.
I'll take a look.
Quoted 11 lines · Willem de Bruijn
Quoted 5 lines · Alexander Duyck
This patch set addresses a number of issues I found while sorting out enabling UDP GSO Segmentation support for ixgbe/ixgbevf. Specifically there were a number of issues related to the checksum and such that seemed to cause either minor irregularities or kernel panics in the case of the offload request being allowed to traverse between name spaces.
Were you able to traverse GSO packets between network namespace before adding to
NETIF_F_GSO_SOFTWARE? It does appear that veth includesNETIF_F_GSO_ENCAP_ALL, which also allows GSO.
Without that change the tunnel wouldn't pass the requests between namespaces. However with it I was able to easily test the software checksum code as otherwise the socket was returning EIO when the hardware checksum was disabled.
Quoted 5 lines
In either case, it should not be possible for GSO packets to arrive on a veth device, as that can result in queuing the GSO packet to a recipient socket. In this regard veth is like loopback and must exclude GSO support.
I'll take a look.
I suspect it was probably sending veth UDP segmentation offload requests. For now I can probably drop he patch that was adding it and it can be added later to individual drivers if needed.
Thanks.
- Alex
Willem de Bruijn
maintainerQuoted 23 lines · Alexander Duyck
Quoted 11 lines · Willem de Bruijn
Quoted 5 lines · Alexander Duyck
This patch set addresses a number of issues I found while sorting out enabling UDP GSO Segmentation support for ixgbe/ixgbevf. Specifically there were a number of issues related to the checksum and such that seemed to cause either minor irregularities or kernel panics in the case of the offload request being allowed to traverse between name spaces.
Were you able to traverse GSO packets between network namespace before adding to
NETIF_F_GSO_SOFTWARE? It does appear that veth includesNETIF_F_GSO_ENCAP_ALL, which also allows GSO.Without that change the tunnel wouldn't pass the requests between namespaces. However with it I was able to easily test the software checksum code as otherwise the socket was returning EIO when the hardware checksum was disabled.
Quoted 4 lines
In either case, it should not be possible for GSO packets to arrive on a veth device, as that can result in queuing the GSO packet to a recipient socket. In this regard veth is like loopback and must exclude GSO support.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
I'll take a look.
I suspect it was probably sending veth UDP segmentation offload requests. For now I can probably drop he patch that was adding it and it can be added later to individual drivers if needed.
I just tested udpgso_bench_tx over veth (on a commit without your patchset).
Having NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4 in NETIF_F_GSO_ENCAP_ALL and NETIF_F_GSO_ENCAP_ALL in VETH_FEATURES is sufficient to receive large packets on the veth peer.
This is clearly a bug, as is for any device that may loop packets onto a local socket. Such as macvlan in bridge mode.
I will have to revise commit 83aa025f535f ("udp: add gso support to virtual devices")
It remains useful to have this capability on the bonding device. I might remove the flag from NETIF_F_GSO_ENCAP_ALL and add it specifically to that device.
This is also all relevant to future work of NETIF_F_GSO_SOFTWARE.
Quoted 41 lines · Willem de Bruijn
Quoted 23 lines · Alexander Duyck
Quoted 11 lines · Willem de Bruijn
Quoted 5 lines · Alexander Duyck
This patch set addresses a number of issues I found while sorting out enabling UDP GSO Segmentation support for ixgbe/ixgbevf. Specifically there were a number of issues related to the checksum and such that seemed to cause either minor irregularities or kernel panics in the case of the offload request being allowed to traverse between name spaces.
Were you able to traverse GSO packets between network namespace before adding to
NETIF_F_GSO_SOFTWARE? It does appear that veth includesNETIF_F_GSO_ENCAP_ALL, which also allows GSO.Without that change the tunnel wouldn't pass the requests between namespaces. However with it I was able to easily test the software checksum code as otherwise the socket was returning EIO when the hardware checksum was disabled.
Quoted 4 lines
In either case, it should not be possible for GSO packets to arrive on a veth device, as that can result in queuing the GSO packet to a recipient socket. In this regard veth is like loopback and must exclude GSO support.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
I'll take a look.
I suspect it was probably sending veth UDP segmentation offload requests. For now I can probably drop he patch that was adding it and it can be added later to individual drivers if needed.
I just tested
udpgso_bench_txover veth (on a commit without your patchset).Having
NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4inNETIF_F_GSO_ENCAP_ALLandNETIF_F_GSO_ENCAP_ALLinVETH_FEATURESis sufficient to receive large packets on the veth peer.This is clearly a bug, as is for any device that may loop packets onto a local socket. Such as macvlan in bridge mode.
Quoted 8 lines
I will have to revise commit
83aa025f535f("udp: add gso support to virtual devices")It remains useful to have this capability on the bonding device. I might remove the flag from
NETIF_F_GSO_ENCAP_ALLand add it specifically to that device.This is also all relevant to future work of
NETIF_F_GSO_SOFTWARE.
Sounds like a plan. In the meantime I am going to see about getting some internal paperwork taken care of to get UDP GSO added to ixgbe/ixgbevf as an official feature.
I need to finish up some work I am doing on macvlan over the next couple of weeks so I won't be focusing on this code for the next month or so.
Thanks.
- Alex