pwm: kconfig: enable kona pwm to be built for cygnus arch
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/2 pwm: kconfig: enable kona pwm to be built for cygnus arch
The Cygnus architecture use a Kona PWM. This is already present in the device tree but can't be built actually. Hence, allow the Kona PWM to be built for Cygnus arch.
--- drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/pwm/Kconfig +2 -1
@@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ config PWM_BCM_IPROC config PWM_BCM_KONA tristate "Kona PWM support" - depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE + depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE || ARCH_BCM_CYGNUS + default ARCH_BCM_CYGNUS help Generic PWM framework driver for Broadcom Kona PWM block.
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
PATCH 2/2 pwm: bcm-kona: apply pwm settings on enable
From: Suji Velupillai <[email protected]>
When pwm_bl framework calls enable, a call to pwm_is_enabled(pwm) still return false, this prevents the backlight being turn on at boot time.
--- drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c +11 -5
@@ -108,8 +108,8 @@ static void kona_pwmc_apply_settings(struct kona_pwmc *kp, unsigned int chan)ndelay (400 ); } -static int kona_pwmc_config (struct pwm_chip *chip,struct pwm_device *pwm, -int duty_ns,int period_ns) +static int __pwmc_config (struct pwm_chip *chip,struct pwm_device *pwm, +int duty_ns,int period_ns,bool pwmc_enabled) {struct kona_pwmc *kp =to_kona_pwmc (chip);u64 val, div, rate;
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static int kona_pwmc_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,* always calculated above to ensure the new values are * validated immediately instead of on enable. */ -if (pwm_is_enabled (pwm)) { +if (pwm_is_enabled (pwm) || pwmc_enabled) {kona_pwmc_prepare_for_settings (kp, chan); value =readl (kp->base +PRESCALE_OFFSET );
@@ -173,6 +173,12 @@ static int kona_pwmc_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,return 0 ; } +static int kona_pwmc_config (struct pwm_chip *chip,struct pwm_device *pwm, +int duty_ns,int period_ns) +{ +return __pwmc_config (chip, pwm, duty_ns, period_ns, false); +} +static int kona_pwmc_set_polarity (struct pwm_chip *chip,struct pwm_device *pwm,enum pwm_polarity polarity) {
@@ -216,8 +222,8 @@ static int kona_pwmc_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)return ret; } - ret =kona_pwmc_config (chip, pwm,pwm_get_duty_cycle (pwm), -pwm_get_period (pwm)); + ret =__pwmc_config (chip, pwm,pwm_get_duty_cycle (pwm), +pwm_get_period (pwm), true);if (ret <0 ) {clk_disable_unprepare (kp->clk);return ret;
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: bcm-kona: apply pwm settings on enable
Hello,
Quoted 27 lines · Clément Péron
From: Suji Velupillai <[email protected]>
When
pwm_blframework calls enable, a call topwm_is_enabled(pwm)still return false, this prevents the backlight being turn on at boot time.Signed-off-by Suji Velupillai <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Clément Péron <[email protected]>--- drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c +2
-2@@ -108,8 +108,8 @@ static void kona_pwmc_apply_settings(struct kona_pwmc *kp, unsigned int chan)ndelay (400 ); } -static int kona_pwmc_config (struct pwm_chip *chip,struct pwm_device *pwm, -int duty_ns,int period_ns) +static int __pwmc_config (struct pwm_chip *chip,struct pwm_device *pwm, +int duty_ns,int period_ns,bool pwmc_enabled) {struct kona_pwmc *kp =to_kona_pwmc (chip);u64 val, div, rate;
drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c static int kona_pwmc_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, · line 158
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c +1
-1@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static int kona_pwmc_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,* always calculated above to ensure the new values are * validated immediately instead of on enable. */ -if (pwm_is_enabled (pwm)) { +if (pwm_is_enabled (pwm) || pwmc_enabled) {
Having pwm-API-calls in hw-drivers is ugly. Apart from not giving the intended return code this function should IMHO be reserved to pwm consumers. The underlaying problem is that pwm-bl does:
pwm_config(pwm, duty_cycle, period); pwm_enable(pwm);
and expects that the duty_cycle and period is used then. Doesn't everything works just fine if the if-block is always executed?
The better fix here would be to convert the driver to the atomic API (i.e. implement .apply instead of .config, .set_polarity, .enable and .disable).
Alternatively in .enable ensure that the hardware is programmed with the parameters from pwm->state. (But converting to the atomic API is the better approach.)
Best regards
Uwe
Signature · 2 lines
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: bcm-kona: apply pwm settings on enable
Hi Uwe,
Quoted 41 lines · Uwe Kleine-König
Hello,
Quoted 27 lines · Clément Péron
From: Suji Velupillai <[email protected]>
When
pwm_blframework calls enable, a call topwm_is_enabled(pwm)still return false, this prevents the backlight being turn on at boot time.Signed-off-by Suji Velupillai <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Clément Péron <[email protected]>--- drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c +2
-2@@ -108,8 +108,8 @@ static void kona_pwmc_apply_settings(struct kona_pwmc *kp, unsigned int chan)ndelay (400 ); } -static int kona_pwmc_config (struct pwm_chip *chip,struct pwm_device *pwm, -int duty_ns,int period_ns) +static int __pwmc_config (struct pwm_chip *chip,struct pwm_device *pwm, +int duty_ns,int period_ns,bool pwmc_enabled) {struct kona_pwmc *kp =to_kona_pwmc (chip);u64 val, div, rate;drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c static int kona_pwmc_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, · line 158
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c +1
-1@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static int kona_pwmc_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,* always calculated above to ensure the new values are * validated immediately instead of on enable. */ -if (pwm_is_enabled (pwm)) { +if (pwm_is_enabled (pwm) || pwmc_enabled) {Having pwm-API-calls in hw-drivers is ugly. Apart from not giving the intended return code this function should IMHO be reserved to pwm consumers. The underlaying problem is that pwm-bl does:
Quoted 5 lines
pwm_config(pwm, duty_cycle, period); pwm_enable(pwm);and expects that the
duty_cycleand period is used then. Doesn't everything works just fine if the if-block is always executed?
Tested and works fine for me. But I only have a Cygnus proc. Maybe there is some issue with Kona as explained by the comment (even if I don't understand it well).
* Don't apply settings if disabled. The period and duty cycle are
* always calculated above to ensure the new values are
* validated immediately instead of on enable.
Regards,
Clement
Quoted 15 lines
The better fix here would be to convert the driver to the atomic API (i.e. implement .apply instead of .config, .set_polarity, .enable and .disable).
Alternatively in .enable ensure that the hardware is programmed with the parameters from
pwm->state. (But converting to the atomic API is the better approach.)Best regards
Uwe--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: bcm-kona: apply pwm settings on enable
Hello,
adding Tim Kryger as the initial author of the bcm-kona driver to Cc:. Maybe he can shed some light to the questions below?
Quoted 46 lines · Clément Péron
Quoted 38 lines · Uwe Kleine-König
Quoted 27 lines · Clément Péron
From: Suji Velupillai <[email protected]>
When
pwm_blframework calls enable, a call topwm_is_enabled(pwm)still return false, this prevents the backlight being turn on at boot time.Signed-off-by Suji Velupillai <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Clément Péron <[email protected]>--- drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c +2
-2@@ -108,8 +108,8 @@ static void kona_pwmc_apply_settings(struct kona_pwmc *kp, unsigned int chan)ndelay (400 ); } -static int kona_pwmc_config (struct pwm_chip *chip,struct pwm_device *pwm, -int duty_ns,int period_ns) +static int __pwmc_config (struct pwm_chip *chip,struct pwm_device *pwm, +int duty_ns,int period_ns,bool pwmc_enabled) {struct kona_pwmc *kp =to_kona_pwmc (chip);u64 val, div, rate;drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c static int kona_pwmc_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, · line 158
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c +1
-1@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static int kona_pwmc_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,* always calculated above to ensure the new values are * validated immediately instead of on enable. */ -if (pwm_is_enabled (pwm)) { +if (pwm_is_enabled (pwm) || pwmc_enabled) {Having pwm-API-calls in hw-drivers is ugly. Apart from not giving the intended return code this function should IMHO be reserved to pwm consumers. The underlaying problem is that pwm-bl does:
Quoted 5 lines
pwm_config(pwm, duty_cycle, period); pwm_enable(pwm);and expects that the
duty_cycleand period is used then. Doesn't everything works just fine if the if-block is always executed?
Quoted 7 lines
Tested and works fine for me. But I only have a Cygnus proc. Maybe there is some issue with Kona as explained by the comment (even if I don't understand it well).
* Don't apply settings if disabled. The period and duty cycle are
* always calculated above to ensure the new values are
* validated immediately instead of on enable.
I wouldn't understand that as "If you apply settings on a disabled PWM a kitten dies". I think it only means: At the current point in time duty_cycle and period are not important as the hardware is off. So don't bother to write these values to the hardware.
@Tim: Do you think (or can test if) there is a problem when doing
- if (pwm_is_enabled(pwm)) {
+ if (1) {
in kona_pwmc_config? (For sure the comment needs adaption and the if (1) shouldn't make it into the driver, just used that as shorthand for the change I want to suggest.)
But still better than dropping the check is to convert the driver to the atomic API. With that this problem would simply not occur.
Best regards
Uwe
Signature · 2 lines
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: bcm-kona: apply pwm settings on enable
Quoted 78 lines · Uwe Kleine-König
Hello,
adding Tim Kryger as the initial author of the bcm-kona driver to Cc:. Maybe he can shed some light to the questions below?
Quoted 46 lines · Clément Péron
Quoted 38 lines · Uwe Kleine-König
Quoted 27 lines · Clément Péron
From: Suji Velupillai <[email protected]>
When
pwm_blframework calls enable, a call topwm_is_enabled(pwm)still return false, this prevents the backlight being turn on at boot time.Signed-off-by Suji Velupillai <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Clément Péron <[email protected]>--- drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c +2
-2@@ -108,8 +108,8 @@ static void kona_pwmc_apply_settings(struct kona_pwmc *kp, unsigned int chan)ndelay (400 ); } -static int kona_pwmc_config (struct pwm_chip *chip,struct pwm_device *pwm, -int duty_ns,int period_ns) +static int __pwmc_config (struct pwm_chip *chip,struct pwm_device *pwm, +int duty_ns,int period_ns,bool pwmc_enabled) {struct kona_pwmc *kp =to_kona_pwmc (chip);u64 val, div, rate;drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c static int kona_pwmc_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, · line 158
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c +1
-1@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static int kona_pwmc_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,* always calculated above to ensure the new values are * validated immediately instead of on enable. */ -if (pwm_is_enabled (pwm)) { +if (pwm_is_enabled (pwm) || pwmc_enabled) {Having pwm-API-calls in hw-drivers is ugly. Apart from not giving the intended return code this function should IMHO be reserved to pwm consumers. The underlaying problem is that pwm-bl does:
Quoted 5 lines
pwm_config(pwm, duty_cycle, period); pwm_enable(pwm);and expects that the
duty_cycleand period is used then. Doesn't everything works just fine if the if-block is always executed?Quoted 7 lines
Tested and works fine for me. But I only have a Cygnus proc. Maybe there is some issue with Kona as explained by the comment (even if I don't understand it well).
* Don't apply settings if disabled. The period and duty cycle are
* always calculated above to ensure the new values are
* validated immediately instead of on enable.I wouldn't understand that as "If you apply settings on a disabled PWM a kitten dies". I think it only means: At the current point in time
duty_cycleand period are not important as the hardware is off. So don't bother to write these values to the hardware.@Tim: Do you think (or can test if) there is a problem when doing
(quoted diff) +1
-1- if (pwm_is_enabled(pwm)) { + if (1) {in
kona_pwmc_config? (For sure the comment needs adaption and the if (1) shouldn't make it into the driver, just used that as shorthand for the change I want to suggest.)But still better than dropping the check is to convert the driver to the atomic API. With that this problem would simply not occur.
Quoted 6 lines
Best regards
Uwe--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
There is no per channel disable in the hardware so to simulate a disable, duty is set to zero.
The check is there to prevent new config values from applying until the channel is enabled.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: bcm-kona: apply pwm settings on enable
In reply to Clément PéronQuoted 10 lines · Clément Péron
From: Suji Velupillai <[email protected]>
When
pwm_blframework calls enable, a call topwm_is_enabled(pwm)still return false, this prevents the backlight being turn on at boot time.Signed-off-by Suji Velupillai <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Clément Péron <[email protected]>--- drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
I see v2 and v3 of patch 1 of the series. Did you work on v2 of this patch (2/2) as well? I don't see it on the list and it didn't seem like everyone was happy with this version.
Thierry
Re: [PATCH 2/2] pwm: bcm-kona: apply pwm settings on enable
Hi Thierry,
Quoted 13 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 10 lines · Clément Péron
From: Suji Velupillai <[email protected]>
When
pwm_blframework calls enable, a call topwm_is_enabled(pwm)still return false, this prevents the backlight being turn on at boot time.Signed-off-by Suji Velupillai <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Clément Péron <[email protected]>--- drivers/pwm/pwm-bcm-kona.c | 16 +++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Quoted 3 lines
I see v2 and v3 of patch 1 of the series. Did you work on v2 of this patch (2/2) as well? I don't see it on the list and it didn't seem like everyone was happy with this version.
No, I dropped it.
Was working on an atomic convert of the driver but I don't have access to my cygnus board anymore.
Regards,
Clement
Quoted 2 lines
Thierry
Quoted 14 lines · Clément Péron
The Cygnus architecture use a Kona PWM. This is already present in the device tree but can't be built actually. Hence, allow the Kona PWM to be built for Cygnus arch.
Signed-off-by Clément Péron <[email protected]>--- drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/pwm/Kconfig +0
-0
drivers/pwm/Kconfig config PWM_BCM_IPROC · line 92
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/pwm/Kconfig +2
-1@@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ config PWM_BCM_IPROC config PWM_BCM_KONA tristate "Kona PWM support" - depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE + depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE || ARCH_BCM_CYGNUS + default ARCH_BCM_CYGNUS
Is it possible to build this driver also on other arches? Then you might want to consider
depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE || ARCH_BCM_CYGNUS || COMPILE_TEST
Best regards
Uwe
Signature · 2 lines
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Quoted 24 lines · Uwe Kleine-König
Quoted 14 lines · Clément Péron
The Cygnus architecture use a Kona PWM. This is already present in the device tree but can't be built actually. Hence, allow the Kona PWM to be built for Cygnus arch.
Signed-off-by Clément Péron <[email protected]>--- drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/pwm/Kconfig +0
-0drivers/pwm/Kconfig config PWM_BCM_IPROC · line 92
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/pwm/Kconfig +2
-1@@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ config PWM_BCM_IPROC config PWM_BCM_KONA tristate "Kona PWM support" - depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE + depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE || ARCH_BCM_CYGNUS + default ARCH_BCM_CYGNUSIs it possible to build this driver also on other arches? Then you might want to consider
Quoted 1 line
depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE || ARCH_BCM_CYGNUS || COMPILE_TEST
good idea to add the COMPILE_TEST just to increase compile coverage
Quoted 4 lines
Best regards
Uwe
Hi Uwe, Scott,
Quoted 27 lines · Scott Branden
Quoted 24 lines · Uwe Kleine-König
Quoted 14 lines · Clément Péron
The Cygnus architecture use a Kona PWM. This is already present in the device tree but can't be built actually. Hence, allow the Kona PWM to be built for Cygnus arch.
Signed-off-by Clément Péron <[email protected]>--- drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/pwm/Kconfig +0
-0drivers/pwm/Kconfig config PWM_BCM_IPROC · line 92
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/pwm/Kconfig +2
-1@@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ config PWM_BCM_IPROC config PWM_BCM_KONA tristate "Kona PWM support" - depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE + depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE || ARCH_BCM_CYGNUS + default ARCH_BCM_CYGNUSIs it possible to build this driver also on other arches? Then you might want to consider
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line
depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE || ARCH_BCM_CYGNUS || COMPILE_TESTgood idea to add the
COMPILE_TESTjust to increase compile coverage
Will Do.
Thanks,
Clement
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Best regards
Uwe
Quoted 30 lines · Clément Péron
Hi Uwe, Scott,
Quoted 27 lines · Scott Branden
Quoted 24 lines · Uwe Kleine-König
Quoted 14 lines · Clément Péron
The Cygnus architecture use a Kona PWM. This is already present in the device tree but can't be built actually. Hence, allow the Kona PWM to be built for Cygnus arch.
Signed-off-by Clément Péron <[email protected]>--- drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/pwm/Kconfig +0
-0drivers/pwm/Kconfig config PWM_BCM_IPROC · line 92
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/pwm/Kconfig +2
-1@@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ config PWM_BCM_IPROC config PWM_BCM_KONA tristate "Kona PWM support" - depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE + depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE || ARCH_BCM_CYGNUS + default ARCH_BCM_CYGNUSIs it possible to build this driver also on other arches? Then you might want to consider
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line
depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE || ARCH_BCM_CYGNUS || COMPILE_TESTgood idea to add the
COMPILE_TESTjust to increase compile coverageWill Do.
This is known to potentially break builds on things like UM where we have !HAS_IOMEM. Please make sure you thoroughly build-test before you switch on COMPILE_TEST.
Thierry
Hi Thierry,
Quoted 32 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 30 lines · Clément Péron
Hi Uwe, Scott,
Quoted 27 lines · Scott Branden
Quoted 24 lines · Uwe Kleine-König
Quoted 14 lines · Clément Péron
The Cygnus architecture use a Kona PWM. This is already present in the device tree but can't be built actually. Hence, allow the Kona PWM to be built for Cygnus arch.
Signed-off-by Clément Péron <[email protected]>--- drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/pwm/Kconfig +0
-0drivers/pwm/Kconfig config PWM_BCM_IPROC · line 92
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/pwm/Kconfig +2
-1@@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ config PWM_BCM_IPROC config PWM_BCM_KONA tristate "Kona PWM support" - depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE + depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE || ARCH_BCM_CYGNUS + default ARCH_BCM_CYGNUSIs it possible to build this driver also on other arches? Then you might want to consider
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line
depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE || ARCH_BCM_CYGNUS || COMPILE_TESTgood idea to add the
COMPILE_TESTjust to increase compile coverageWill Do.
This is known to potentially break builds on things like UM where we have !HAS_IOMEM. Please make sure you thoroughly build-test before you switch on
COMPILE_TEST.
Thanks for the point, so something like this (but maybe it's too protective no ?) :
config PWM_BCM_KONA
tristate "Kona PWM support"
depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE || ARCH_BCM_CYGNUS || COMPILE_TEST
depends on COMMON_CLK && HAS_IOMEM && OF
default ARCH_BCM_CYGNUSRegards,
Clement
Quoted 2 lines
Thierry
Quoted 44 lines · Clément Péron
Hi Thierry,
Quoted 32 lines · Thierry Reding
Quoted 30 lines · Clément Péron
Hi Uwe, Scott,
Quoted 27 lines · Scott Branden
Quoted 24 lines · Uwe Kleine-König
Quoted 14 lines · Clément Péron
The Cygnus architecture use a Kona PWM. This is already present in the device tree but can't be built actually. Hence, allow the Kona PWM to be built for Cygnus arch.
Signed-off-by Clément Péron <[email protected]>--- drivers/pwm/Kconfig | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/pwm/Kconfig +0
-0drivers/pwm/Kconfig config PWM_BCM_IPROC · line 92
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/pwm/Kconfig +2
-1@@ -88,7 +88,8 @@ config PWM_BCM_IPROC config PWM_BCM_KONA tristate "Kona PWM support" - depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE + depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE || ARCH_BCM_CYGNUS + default ARCH_BCM_CYGNUSIs it possible to build this driver also on other arches? Then you might want to consider
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line
depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE || ARCH_BCM_CYGNUS || COMPILE_TESTgood idea to add the
COMPILE_TESTjust to increase compile coverageWill Do.
This is known to potentially break builds on things like UM where we have !HAS_IOMEM. Please make sure you thoroughly build-test before you switch on
COMPILE_TEST.
Quoted 7 lines
Thanks for the point, so something like this (but maybe it's too protective no ?) :
config
PWM_BCM_KONAtristate "Kona PWM support" depends on ARCH_BCM_MOBILE || ARCH_BCM_CYGNUS || COMPILE_TEST depends on COMMON_CLK && HAS_IOMEM && OF
Instead of COMMON_CLK HAVE_CLK should be good enough. Just for compile testing the default implementations provided in include/linux/clk.h should even be good enough in the !HAVE_CLK case.
Also OF might not be necessary, at least the driver compiles fine on amd64 without OF.
Best regards
Uwe
Signature · 2 lines
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |