Skip to contentSkip to conversation

mtd: spinand: Add #define-s for page-read ops with three-byte addresses

PATCH Superseded Jeff Kletsky 4 participants 11 messages May 14, 2019 – May 20, 2019 1 message not in the archive

Subsystems (2)

v2 of 4 Superseded Latest is v4 →

lore
Share & tools
lore

A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]

#1 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/3 mtd: spinand: Add #define-s for page-read ops with three-byte addresses

From: Jeff Kletsky <[email protected]>

The GigaDevice GD5F1GQ4UFxxG SPI NAND utilizes three-byte addresses for its page-read ops.

http://www.gigadevice.com/datasheet/gd5f1gq4xfxxg/

---
 include/linux/mtd/spinand.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
include/linux/mtd/spinand.h +30 -0
index b92e2aa955b6..05fe98eebe27 100644
@@ -68,30 +68,60 @@
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 1))
 
+#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_OP_3A(fast, addr, ndummy, buf, len) \
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(fast ? 0x0b : 0x03, 1),		\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 1))
+
 #define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X2_OP(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
 	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x3b, 1),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(2, addr, 1),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 2))
 
+#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X2_OP_3A(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x3b, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 2))
+
 #define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X4_OP(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
 	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x6b, 1),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(2, addr, 1),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 4))
 
+#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X4_OP_3A(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x6b, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 4))
+
 #define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_DUALIO_OP(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
 	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0xbb, 1),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(2, addr, 2),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 2),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 2))
 
+#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_DUALIO_OP_3A(addr, ndummy, buf, len) \
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0xbb, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 2),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 2),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 2))
+
 #define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_QUADIO_OP(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
 	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0xeb, 1),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(2, addr, 4),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 4),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 4))
 
+#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_QUADIO_OP_3A(addr, ndummy, buf, len) \
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0xeb, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 4),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 4),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 4))
+
 #define SPINAND_PROG_EXEC_OP(addr)					\
 	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x10, 1),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 1),				\
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
#2 lore raw
Quoted 1 line · Jeff Kletsky

From: Jeff Kletsky <[email protected]>

That #define in $subject is called a macro.

Seems this patch adds a lot of almost duplicate code, can it be somehow de-duplicated ?

Quoted 76 lines

The GigaDevice GD5F1GQ4UFxxG SPI NAND utilizes three-byte addresses for its page-read ops.

http://www.gigadevice.com/datasheet/gd5f1gq4xfxxg/

---
 include/linux/mtd/spinand.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
include/linux/mtd/spinand.h +30 -0
index b92e2aa955b6..05fe98eebe27 100644
@@ -68,30 +68,60 @@
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 1))
 
+#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_OP_3A(fast, addr, ndummy, buf, len) \
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(fast ? 0x0b : 0x03, 1),		\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 1))
+
 #define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X2_OP(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
 	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x3b, 1),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(2, addr, 1),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 2))
 
+#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X2_OP_3A(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x3b, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 2))
+
 #define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X4_OP(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
 	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x6b, 1),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(2, addr, 1),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 4))
 
+#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X4_OP_3A(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x6b, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 4))
+
 #define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_DUALIO_OP(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
 	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0xbb, 1),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(2, addr, 2),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 2),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 2))
 
+#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_DUALIO_OP_3A(addr, ndummy, buf, len) \
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0xbb, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 2),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 2),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 2))
+
 #define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_QUADIO_OP(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
 	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0xeb, 1),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(2, addr, 4),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 4),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 4))
 
+#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_QUADIO_OP_3A(addr, ndummy, buf, len) \
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0xeb, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 4),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 4),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 4))
+
 #define SPINAND_PROG_EXEC_OP(addr)					\
 	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x10, 1),				\
 		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 1),				\
Signature · 2 lines
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
#3 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 1 line · Jeff Kletsky

From: Jeff Kletsky <[email protected]>

That #define in $subject is called a macro.

Seems this patch adds a lot of almost duplicate code, can it be somehow de-duplicated ?

We could add another parameter naddr or addrlen to the SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_XX_OPs and pass the value 2 for all existing chips except for GD5F1GQ4UFxxG which needs 3 bytes address length.

This would cause one more argument to each of the macro calls in all chip drivers. As long as there are only two flavors (2 and 3 bytes) I'm not sure if this really would make things easier and also this is "only" preprocessor code.

So anyways, I would be fine with both approaches, Jeff's current one or one with another parameter for the address length.

By the way: Jeff, you didn't carry my Reviewed-by tag to v2. So I will just reply again to add the tags.

Quoted 79 lines
Quoted 77 lines

The GigaDevice GD5F1GQ4UFxxG SPI NAND utilizes three-byte addresses for its page-read ops.

http://www.gigadevice.com/datasheet/gd5f1gq4xfxxg/

---
  include/linux/mtd/spinand.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
include/linux/mtd/spinand.h +30 -0
index b92e2aa955b6..05fe98eebe27 100644
@@ -68,30 +68,60 @@
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 1))
 
+#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_OP_3A(fast, addr, ndummy, buf, len) \
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(fast ? 0x0b : 0x03, 1),		\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 1))
+
  #define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X2_OP(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
  	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x3b, 1),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(2, addr, 1),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 2))
 
+#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X2_OP_3A(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x3b, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 2))
+
  #define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X4_OP(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
  	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x6b, 1),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(2, addr, 1),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 4))
 
+#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X4_OP_3A(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x6b, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 4))
+
  #define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_DUALIO_OP(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
  	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0xbb, 1),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(2, addr, 2),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 2),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 2))
 
+#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_DUALIO_OP_3A(addr, ndummy, buf, len) \
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0xbb, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 2),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 2),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 2))
+
  #define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_QUADIO_OP(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
  	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0xeb, 1),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(2, addr, 4),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 4),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 4))
 
+#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_QUADIO_OP_3A(addr, ndummy, buf, len) \
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0xeb, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 4),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 4),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 4))
+
  #define SPINAND_PROG_EXEC_OP(addr)					\
  	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x10, 1),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 1),				\
#4 lore raw
Quoted 52 lines · Schrempf Frieder
Quoted 6 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 1 line · Jeff Kletsky

From: Jeff Kletsky <[email protected]>

That #define in $subject is called a macro.

Seems this patch adds a lot of almost duplicate code, can it be somehow de-duplicated ?

We could add another parameter naddr or addrlen to the SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_XX_OPs and pass the value 2 for all existing chips except for GD5F1GQ4UFxxG which needs 3 bytes address length.

This would cause one more argument to each of the macro calls in all chip drivers. As long as there are only two flavors (2 and 3 bytes) I'm not sure if this really would make things easier and also this is "only" preprocessor code.

So anyways, I would be fine with both approaches, Jeff's current one or one with another parameter for the address length.

By the way: Jeff, you didn't carry my Reviewed-by tag to v2. So I will just reply again to add the tags.

Quoted 30 lines
Quoted 30 lines

The GigaDevice GD5F1GQ4UFxxG SPI NAND utilizes three-byte addresses for its page-read ops.

http://www.gigadevice.com/datasheet/gd5f1gq4xfxxg/

---
   include/linux/mtd/spinand.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
   1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
include/linux/mtd/spinand.h +6 -0
index b92e2aa955b6..05fe98eebe27 100644
@@ -68,30 +68,60 @@
   		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
   		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 1))
 
+#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_OP_3A(fast, addr, ndummy, buf, len) \
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(fast ? 0x0b : 0x03, 1),		\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 1))
+
   #define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X2_OP(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
   	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x3b, 1),				\
   		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(2, addr, 1),				\
   		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
   		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 2))
 
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

[ _3A addition repeated three more times for similar ops ... ]

It's easy enough to change the wording, and will do so on the next revision.

However, it's not clear to me that there is consensus on if the present set of macros is acceptable/preferred over definition of a set of ones that accept an additional parameter.

At least from my perspective and as Schrempf Frieder has hinted at, these macros are syntactic sugar and all result in equivalent C code.

Either should compile to the same run-time size and performance (assuming reasonably that a construct like true ? 0x0b : 0x03 is optimized out).

Adding an additional parameter, at least for me, wouldn't improve readability of the code and is offset by the need to refactor four other files. Even though it should be a simple/trivial refactor, I do not have any examples of the four other manufacturers' chips to be able to confirm proper operation.

I'll prepare a reworded set of patches with the present macro structure.

If there is strong feeling for refactoring the macro set, please let me know.

Jeff

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

maintainer
#5 lore raw

Hi Jeff,

Jeff Kletsky <[email protected]> wrote on Sun, 19 May 2019 13:27:58 -0700:

Quoted 66 lines · Schrempf Frieder
Quoted 44 lines · Marek Vasut
Quoted 6 lines · Jeff Kletsky
Quoted 1 line

From: Jeff Kletsky <[email protected]>

That #define in $subject is called a macro.

Seems this patch adds a lot of almost duplicate code, can it be somehow de-duplicated ?

We could add another parameter naddr or addrlen to the SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_XX_OPs and pass the value 2 for all existing chips except for GD5F1GQ4UFxxG which needs 3 bytes address length.

This would cause one more argument to each of the macro calls in all chip drivers. As long as there are only two flavors (2 and 3 bytes) I'm not sure if this really would make things easier and also this is "only" preprocessor code.

So anyways, I would be fine with both approaches, Jeff's current one or one with another parameter for the address length.

By the way: Jeff, you didn't carry my Reviewed-by tag to v2. So I will just reply again to add the tags.

Quoted 21 lines
Quoted 21 lines

The GigaDevice GD5F1GQ4UFxxG SPI NAND utilizes three-byte addresses for its page-read ops.

http://www.gigadevice.com/datasheet/gd5f1gq4xfxxg/

---
   include/linux/mtd/spinand.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
   1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
include/linux/mtd/spinand.h +3 -0
index b92e2aa955b6..05fe98eebe27 100644
@@ -68,30 +68,60 @@
   		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
   		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 1))  
   >>> +#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_OP_3A(fast, addr, ndummy, buf, len) \  
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(fast ? 0x0b : 0x03, 1),		\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines

include/linux/mtd/spinand.h

Quoted 8 lines
include/linux/mtd/spinand.h +2 -0
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 1))
+
   #define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X2_OP(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
   	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x3b, 1),				\
   		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(2, addr, 1),				\
   		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
   		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 2))  
   >>> [ _3A addition repeated three more times for similar ops ... ]  

It's easy enough to change the wording, and will do so on the next revision.

However, it's not clear to me that there is consensus on if the present set of macros is acceptable/preferred over definition of a set of ones that accept an additional parameter.

At least from my perspective and as Schrempf Frieder has hinted at, these macros are syntactic sugar and all result in equivalent C code.

Either should compile to the same run-time size and performance (assuming reasonably that a construct like true ? 0x0b : 0x03 is optimized out).

Quoted 8 lines

Adding an additional parameter, at least for me, wouldn't improve readability of the code and is offset by the need to refactor four other files. Even though it should be a simple/trivial refactor, I do not have any examples of the four other manufacturers' chips to be able to confirm proper operation.

I'll prepare a reworded set of patches with the present macro structure.

If there is strong feeling for refactoring the macro set, please let me know.

On my side I would rather not add this extra argument, I know it is not very conventional to add so much macros but once you've read one you read all of them and I think it improves the readability of the code using it.

Thanks,
Miquèl

Reviewed-by on v2 1/3
#6 lore raw
In reply to Jeff Kletsky
Quoted 8 lines · Jeff Kletsky

From: Jeff Kletsky <[email protected]>

The GigaDevice GD5F1GQ4UFxxG SPI NAND utilizes three-byte addresses for its page-read ops.

http://www.gigadevice.com/datasheet/gd5f1gq4xfxxg/

Quoted 70 lines
---
  include/linux/mtd/spinand.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
include/linux/mtd/spinand.h +30 -0
index b92e2aa955b6..05fe98eebe27 100644
@@ -68,30 +68,60 @@
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 1))
 
+#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_OP_3A(fast, addr, ndummy, buf, len) \
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(fast ? 0x0b : 0x03, 1),		\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 1))
+
  #define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X2_OP(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
  	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x3b, 1),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(2, addr, 1),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 2))
 
+#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X2_OP_3A(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x3b, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 2))
+
  #define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X4_OP(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
  	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x6b, 1),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(2, addr, 1),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 4))
 
+#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X4_OP_3A(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x6b, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 4))
+
  #define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_DUALIO_OP(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
  	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0xbb, 1),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(2, addr, 2),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 2),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 2))
 
+#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_DUALIO_OP_3A(addr, ndummy, buf, len) \
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0xbb, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 2),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 2),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 2))
+
  #define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_QUADIO_OP(addr, ndummy, buf, len)	\
  	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0xeb, 1),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(2, addr, 4),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 4),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 4))
 
+#define SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_QUADIO_OP_3A(addr, ndummy, buf, len) \
+	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0xeb, 1),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 4),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DUMMY(ndummy, 4),				\
+		   SPI_MEM_OP_DATA_IN(len, buf, 4))
+
  #define SPINAND_PROG_EXEC_OP(addr)					\
  	SPI_MEM_OP(SPI_MEM_OP_CMD(0x10, 1),				\
  		   SPI_MEM_OP_ADDR(3, addr, 1),				\
#7 lore raw

PATCH v2 2/3 mtd: spinand: Add support for two-byte device IDs

In reply to a message not in the archive

From: Jeff Kletsky <[email protected]>

The GigaDevice GD5F1GQ4UFxxG SPI NAND utilizes two-byte device IDs.

http://www.gigadevice.com/datasheet/gd5f1gq4xfxxg/

---
 drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c | 2 +-
 include/linux/mtd/spinand.h | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c +1 -1
index fa87ae28cdfe..a13154785dad 100644
@@ -853,7 +853,7 @@ spinand_select_op_variant(struct spinand_device *spinand,
  */
 int spinand_match_and_init(struct spinand_device *spinand,
 			   const struct spinand_info *table,
-			   unsigned int table_size, u8 devid)
+			   unsigned int table_size, u16 devid)
 {
 	struct nand_device *nand = spinand_to_nand(spinand);
 	unsigned int i;
include/linux/mtd/spinand.h +2 -2
index 05fe98eebe27..8901ba272538 100644
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ struct spinand_ecc_info {
  */
 struct spinand_info {
 	const char *model;
-	u8 devid;
+	u16 devid;
 	u32 flags;
 	struct nand_memory_organization memorg;
 	struct nand_ecc_req eccreq;
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ static inline void spinand_set_of_node(struct spinand_device *spinand,
 
 int spinand_match_and_init(struct spinand_device *dev,
 			   const struct spinand_info *table,
-			   unsigned int table_size, u8 devid);
+			   unsigned int table_size, u16 devid);
 
 int spinand_upd_cfg(struct spinand_device *spinand, u8 mask, u8 val);
 int spinand_select_target(struct spinand_device *spinand, unsigned int target);
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
Reviewed-by on v2 2/3
#8 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mtd: spinand: Add support for two-byte device IDs

Quoted 7 lines · Jeff Kletsky

From: Jeff Kletsky <[email protected]>

The GigaDevice GD5F1GQ4UFxxG SPI NAND utilizes two-byte device IDs.

http://www.gigadevice.com/datasheet/gd5f1gq4xfxxg/

Quoted 41 lines
---
  drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c | 2 +-
  include/linux/mtd/spinand.h | 4 ++--
  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c +1 -1
index fa87ae28cdfe..a13154785dad 100644
@@ -853,7 +853,7 @@ spinand_select_op_variant(struct spinand_device *spinand,
   */
  int spinand_match_and_init(struct spinand_device *spinand,
  			   const struct spinand_info *table,
-			   unsigned int table_size, u8 devid)
+			   unsigned int table_size, u16 devid)
  {
  	struct nand_device *nand = spinand_to_nand(spinand);
  	unsigned int i;
include/linux/mtd/spinand.h +2 -2
index 05fe98eebe27..8901ba272538 100644
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ struct spinand_ecc_info {
   */
  struct spinand_info {
  	const char *model;
-	u8 devid;
+	u16 devid;
  	u32 flags;
  	struct nand_memory_organization memorg;
  	struct nand_ecc_req eccreq;
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ static inline void spinand_set_of_node(struct spinand_device *spinand,
 
  int spinand_match_and_init(struct spinand_device *dev,
  			   const struct spinand_info *table,
-			   unsigned int table_size, u8 devid);
+			   unsigned int table_size, u16 devid);
 
  int spinand_upd_cfg(struct spinand_device *spinand, u8 mask, u8 val);
  int spinand_select_target(struct spinand_device *spinand, unsigned int target);
#9 lore raw

PATCH v2 3/3 mtd: spinand: Add support for GigaDevice GD5F1GQ4UFxxG

In reply to a message not in the archive

From: Jeff Kletsky <[email protected]>

The GigaDevice GD5F1GQ4UFxxG SPI NAND is in current production devices and, while it has the same logical layout as the E-series devices, it differs in the SPI interfacing in significant ways.

This support is contingent on previous commits to:

* Add support for two-byte device IDs
* Add #define-s for page-read ops with three-byte addresses

http://www.gigadevice.com/datasheet/gd5f1gq4xfxxg/

---
 drivers/mtd/nand/spi/gigadevice.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
drivers/mtd/nand/spi/gigadevice.c +64 -15
index 0b49d8264bef..d6497ac4c5d8 100644
@@ -9,11 +9,17 @@
 #include <linux/mtd/spinand.h>
 
 #define SPINAND_MFR_GIGADEVICE			0xC8
+
 #define GD5FXGQ4XA_STATUS_ECC_1_7_BITFLIPS	(1 << 4)
 #define GD5FXGQ4XA_STATUS_ECC_8_BITFLIPS	(3 << 4)
 
 #define GD5FXGQ4UEXXG_REG_STATUS2		0xf0
 
+#define GD5FXGQ4UXFXXG_STATUS_ECC_MASK		(7 << 4)
+#define GD5FXGQ4UXFXXG_STATUS_ECC_NO_BITFLIPS	(0 << 4)
+#define GD5FXGQ4UXFXXG_STATUS_ECC_1_3_BITFLIPS	(1 << 4)
+#define GD5FXGQ4UXFXXG_STATUS_ECC_UNCOR_ERROR	(7 << 4)
+
 static SPINAND_OP_VARIANTS(read_cache_variants,
 		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_QUADIO_OP(0, 2, NULL, 0),
 		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X4_OP(0, 1, NULL, 0),
@@ -22,6 +28,14 @@ static SPINAND_OP_VARIANTS(read_cache_variants,
 		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_OP(true, 0, 1, NULL, 0),
 		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_OP(false, 0, 1, NULL, 0));
 
+static SPINAND_OP_VARIANTS(read_cache_variants_f,
+		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_QUADIO_OP(0, 2, NULL, 0),
+		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X4_OP_3A(0, 1, NULL, 0),
+		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_DUALIO_OP(0, 1, NULL, 0),
+		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X2_OP_3A(0, 1, NULL, 0),
+		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_OP_3A(true, 0, 1, NULL, 0),
+		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_OP_3A(false, 0, 0, NULL, 0));
+
 static SPINAND_OP_VARIANTS(write_cache_variants,
 		SPINAND_PROG_LOAD_X4(true, 0, NULL, 0),
 		SPINAND_PROG_LOAD(true, 0, NULL, 0));
@@ -59,6 +73,11 @@ static int gd5fxgq4xa_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops gd5fxgq4xa_ooblayout = {
+	.ecc = gd5fxgq4xa_ooblayout_ecc,
+	.free = gd5fxgq4xa_ooblayout_free,
+};
+
 static int gd5fxgq4xa_ecc_get_status(struct spinand_device *spinand,
 					 u8 status)
 {
@@ -83,7 +102,7 @@ static int gd5fxgq4xa_ecc_get_status(struct spinand_device *spinand,
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
-static int gd5fxgq4uexxg_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
+static int gd5fxgq4_variant2_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
 				       struct mtd_oob_region *region)
 {
 	if (section)
@@ -95,7 +114,7 @@ static int gd5fxgq4uexxg_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int gd5fxgq4uexxg_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
+static int gd5fxgq4_variant2_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
 					struct mtd_oob_region *region)
 {
 	if (section)
@@ -108,6 +127,11 @@ static int gd5fxgq4uexxg_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops gd5fxgq4_variant2_ooblayout = {
+	.ecc = gd5fxgq4_variant2_ooblayout_ecc,
+	.free = gd5fxgq4_variant2_ooblayout_free,
+};
+
 static int gd5fxgq4uexxg_ecc_get_status(struct spinand_device *spinand,
 					u8 status)
 {
@@ -150,15 +174,25 @@ static int gd5fxgq4uexxg_ecc_get_status(struct spinand_device *spinand,
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
-static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops gd5fxgq4xa_ooblayout = {
-	.ecc = gd5fxgq4xa_ooblayout_ecc,
-	.free = gd5fxgq4xa_ooblayout_free,
-};
+static int gd5fxgq4ufxxg_ecc_get_status(struct spinand_device *spinand,
+					u8 status)
+{
+	switch (status & GD5FXGQ4UXFXXG_STATUS_ECC_MASK) {
+	case GD5FXGQ4UXFXXG_STATUS_ECC_NO_BITFLIPS:
+		return 0;
 
-static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops gd5fxgq4uexxg_ooblayout = {
-	.ecc = gd5fxgq4uexxg_ooblayout_ecc,
-	.free = gd5fxgq4uexxg_ooblayout_free,
-};
+	case GD5FXGQ4UXFXXG_STATUS_ECC_1_3_BITFLIPS:
+		return 3;
+
+	case GD5FXGQ4UXFXXG_STATUS_ECC_UNCOR_ERROR:
+		return -EBADMSG;
+
+	default: /* (2 << 4) through (6 << 4) are 4-8 corrected errors */
+		return ((status & GD5FXGQ4UXFXXG_STATUS_ECC_MASK) >> 4) + 2;
+	}
+
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
 
 static const struct spinand_info gigadevice_spinand_table[] = {
 	SPINAND_INFO("GD5F1GQ4xA", 0xF1,
@@ -195,25 +229,40 @@ static const struct spinand_info gigadevice_spinand_table[] = {
 					      &write_cache_variants,
 					      &update_cache_variants),
 		     0,
-		     SPINAND_ECCINFO(&gd5fxgq4uexxg_ooblayout,
+		     SPINAND_ECCINFO(&gd5fxgq4_variant2_ooblayout,
 				     gd5fxgq4uexxg_ecc_get_status)),
+	SPINAND_INFO("GD5F1GQ4UFxxG", 0xb148,
+		     NAND_MEMORG(1, 2048, 128, 64, 1024, 1, 1, 1),
+		     NAND_ECCREQ(8, 512),
+		     SPINAND_INFO_OP_VARIANTS(&read_cache_variants_f,
+					      &write_cache_variants,
+					      &update_cache_variants),
+		     0,
+		     SPINAND_ECCINFO(&gd5fxgq4_variant2_ooblayout,
+				     gd5fxgq4ufxxg_ecc_get_status)),
 };
 
 static int gigadevice_spinand_detect(struct spinand_device *spinand)
 {
 	u8 *id = spinand->id.data;
+	u16 did;
 	int ret;
 
 	/*
-	 * For GD NANDs, There is an address byte needed to shift in before IDs
-	 * are read out, so the first byte in raw_id is dummy.
+	 * Earlier GDF5-series devices (A,E) return [0][MID][DID]
+	 * Later (F) devices return [MID][DID1][DID2]
 	 */
-	if (id[1] != SPINAND_MFR_GIGADEVICE)
+
+	if (id[0] == SPINAND_MFR_GIGADEVICE)
+		did = (id[1] << 8) + id[2];
+	else if (id[0] == 0 && id[1] == SPINAND_MFR_GIGADEVICE)
+		did = id[2];
+	else
 		return 0;
 
 	ret = spinand_match_and_init(spinand, gigadevice_spinand_table,
 				     ARRAY_SIZE(gigadevice_spinand_table),
-				     id[2]);
+				     did);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
Reviewed-by on v2 3/3
#10 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mtd: spinand: Add support for GigaDevice GD5F1GQ4UFxxG

Quoted 6 lines · Jeff Kletsky

From: Jeff Kletsky <[email protected]>

The GigaDevice GD5F1GQ4UFxxG SPI NAND is in current production devices and, while it has the same logical layout as the E-series devices, it differs in the SPI interfacing in significant ways.

Quoted 8 lines

This support is contingent on previous commits to:

* Add support for two-byte device IDs
* Add #define-s for page-read ops with three-byte addresses

http://www.gigadevice.com/datasheet/gd5f1gq4xfxxg/

Quoted 164 lines
---
  drivers/mtd/nand/spi/gigadevice.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
  1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
drivers/mtd/nand/spi/gigadevice.c +64 -15
index 0b49d8264bef..d6497ac4c5d8 100644
@@ -9,11 +9,17 @@
  #include <linux/mtd/spinand.h>
 
  #define SPINAND_MFR_GIGADEVICE			0xC8
+
  #define GD5FXGQ4XA_STATUS_ECC_1_7_BITFLIPS	(1 << 4)
  #define GD5FXGQ4XA_STATUS_ECC_8_BITFLIPS	(3 << 4)
 
  #define GD5FXGQ4UEXXG_REG_STATUS2		0xf0
 
+#define GD5FXGQ4UXFXXG_STATUS_ECC_MASK		(7 << 4)
+#define GD5FXGQ4UXFXXG_STATUS_ECC_NO_BITFLIPS	(0 << 4)
+#define GD5FXGQ4UXFXXG_STATUS_ECC_1_3_BITFLIPS	(1 << 4)
+#define GD5FXGQ4UXFXXG_STATUS_ECC_UNCOR_ERROR	(7 << 4)
+
  static SPINAND_OP_VARIANTS(read_cache_variants,
  		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_QUADIO_OP(0, 2, NULL, 0),
  		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X4_OP(0, 1, NULL, 0),
@@ -22,6 +28,14 @@ static SPINAND_OP_VARIANTS(read_cache_variants,
  		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_OP(true, 0, 1, NULL, 0),
  		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_OP(false, 0, 1, NULL, 0));
 
+static SPINAND_OP_VARIANTS(read_cache_variants_f,
+		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_QUADIO_OP(0, 2, NULL, 0),
+		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X4_OP_3A(0, 1, NULL, 0),
+		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_DUALIO_OP(0, 1, NULL, 0),
+		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_X2_OP_3A(0, 1, NULL, 0),
+		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_OP_3A(true, 0, 1, NULL, 0),
+		SPINAND_PAGE_READ_FROM_CACHE_OP_3A(false, 0, 0, NULL, 0));
+
  static SPINAND_OP_VARIANTS(write_cache_variants,
  		SPINAND_PROG_LOAD_X4(true, 0, NULL, 0),
  		SPINAND_PROG_LOAD(true, 0, NULL, 0));
@@ -59,6 +73,11 @@ static int gd5fxgq4xa_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
  	return 0;
  }
 
+static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops gd5fxgq4xa_ooblayout = {
+	.ecc = gd5fxgq4xa_ooblayout_ecc,
+	.free = gd5fxgq4xa_ooblayout_free,
+};
+
  static int gd5fxgq4xa_ecc_get_status(struct spinand_device *spinand,
  					 u8 status)
  {
@@ -83,7 +102,7 @@ static int gd5fxgq4xa_ecc_get_status(struct spinand_device *spinand,
  	return -EINVAL;
  }
 
-static int gd5fxgq4uexxg_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
+static int gd5fxgq4_variant2_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
  				       struct mtd_oob_region *region)
  {
  	if (section)
@@ -95,7 +114,7 @@ static int gd5fxgq4uexxg_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
  	return 0;
  }
 
-static int gd5fxgq4uexxg_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
+static int gd5fxgq4_variant2_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
  					struct mtd_oob_region *region)
  {
  	if (section)
@@ -108,6 +127,11 @@ static int gd5fxgq4uexxg_ooblayout_free(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
  	return 0;
  }
 
+static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops gd5fxgq4_variant2_ooblayout = {
+	.ecc = gd5fxgq4_variant2_ooblayout_ecc,
+	.free = gd5fxgq4_variant2_ooblayout_free,
+};
+
  static int gd5fxgq4uexxg_ecc_get_status(struct spinand_device *spinand,
  					u8 status)
  {
@@ -150,15 +174,25 @@ static int gd5fxgq4uexxg_ecc_get_status(struct spinand_device *spinand,
  	return -EINVAL;
  }
 
-static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops gd5fxgq4xa_ooblayout = {
-	.ecc = gd5fxgq4xa_ooblayout_ecc,
-	.free = gd5fxgq4xa_ooblayout_free,
-};
+static int gd5fxgq4ufxxg_ecc_get_status(struct spinand_device *spinand,
+					u8 status)
+{
+	switch (status & GD5FXGQ4UXFXXG_STATUS_ECC_MASK) {
+	case GD5FXGQ4UXFXXG_STATUS_ECC_NO_BITFLIPS:
+		return 0;
 
-static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops gd5fxgq4uexxg_ooblayout = {
-	.ecc = gd5fxgq4uexxg_ooblayout_ecc,
-	.free = gd5fxgq4uexxg_ooblayout_free,
-};
+	case GD5FXGQ4UXFXXG_STATUS_ECC_1_3_BITFLIPS:
+		return 3;
+
+	case GD5FXGQ4UXFXXG_STATUS_ECC_UNCOR_ERROR:
+		return -EBADMSG;
+
+	default: /* (2 << 4) through (6 << 4) are 4-8 corrected errors */
+		return ((status & GD5FXGQ4UXFXXG_STATUS_ECC_MASK) >> 4) + 2;
+	}
+
+	return -EINVAL;
+}
 
  static const struct spinand_info gigadevice_spinand_table[] = {
  	SPINAND_INFO("GD5F1GQ4xA", 0xF1,
@@ -195,25 +229,40 @@ static const struct spinand_info gigadevice_spinand_table[] = {
  					      &write_cache_variants,
  					      &update_cache_variants),
  		     0,
-		     SPINAND_ECCINFO(&gd5fxgq4uexxg_ooblayout,
+		     SPINAND_ECCINFO(&gd5fxgq4_variant2_ooblayout,
  				     gd5fxgq4uexxg_ecc_get_status)),
+	SPINAND_INFO("GD5F1GQ4UFxxG", 0xb148,
+		     NAND_MEMORG(1, 2048, 128, 64, 1024, 1, 1, 1),
+		     NAND_ECCREQ(8, 512),
+		     SPINAND_INFO_OP_VARIANTS(&read_cache_variants_f,
+					      &write_cache_variants,
+					      &update_cache_variants),
+		     0,
+		     SPINAND_ECCINFO(&gd5fxgq4_variant2_ooblayout,
+				     gd5fxgq4ufxxg_ecc_get_status)),
  };
 
  static int gigadevice_spinand_detect(struct spinand_device *spinand)
  {
  	u8 *id = spinand->id.data;
+	u16 did;
  	int ret;
 
  	/*
-	 * For GD NANDs, There is an address byte needed to shift in before IDs
-	 * are read out, so the first byte in raw_id is dummy.
+	 * Earlier GDF5-series devices (A,E) return [0][MID][DID]
+	 * Later (F) devices return [MID][DID1][DID2]
  	 */
-	if (id[1] != SPINAND_MFR_GIGADEVICE)
+
+	if (id[0] == SPINAND_MFR_GIGADEVICE)
+		did = (id[1] << 8) + id[2];
+	else if (id[0] == 0 && id[1] == SPINAND_MFR_GIGADEVICE)
+		did = id[2];
+	else
  		return 0;
 
  	ret = spinand_match_and_init(spinand, gigadevice_spinand_table,
  				     ARRAY_SIZE(gigadevice_spinand_table),
-				     id[2]);
+				     did);
  	if (ret)
  		return ret;
 
#11 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mtd: spinand: Add support for GigaDevice GD5F1GQ4UFxxG

In reply to Jeff Kletsky

This series, https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-mtd/list/?series=107874

superseded by https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-mtd/list/?series=108868

mtd: spinand: Add support for GigaDevice GD5F1GQ4UFxxG <https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-mtd/list/?series=108868>

and marked as "superseded" in Patchwork

Jeff

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/