r8152: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
Subsystems (4)
PATCH 1/1 r8152: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
--- drivers/net/usb/r8152.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/net/usb/r8152.c +3 -3
@@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ struct fw_block {struct fw_header {u8 checksum[32 ];char version[RTL_VER_SIZE ]; -struct fw_block blocks[0 ]; +struct fw_block blocks[]; } __packed;/**
@@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ struct fw_mac {__le32 reserved;__le16 fw_ver_reg;u8 fw_ver_data; -char info[0 ]; +char info[]; } __packed;/**
@@ -982,7 +982,7 @@ struct fw_phy_nc {__le16 bp_start;__le16 bp_num;__le16 bp[4 ]; -char info[0 ]; +char info[]; } __packed;enum rtl_fw_type {
Signature · 1 line
2.25.0
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 06:23:05 -0600
Quoted 22 lines
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99:
struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; };By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
Quoted 7 lines
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit76497732932f("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")Signed-off-by Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Applied.