Skip to contentSkip to conversation

r8152: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

PATCH Applied Gustavo A. R. Silva 2 participants 2 messages Mar 2, 2020

Subsystems (4)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 r8152: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

---
 drivers/net/usb/r8152.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/net/usb/r8152.c +3 -3
index feedc0f964d8..9adfa2bbf593 100644
@@ -891,7 +891,7 @@ struct fw_block {
 struct fw_header {
 	u8 checksum[32];
 	char version[RTL_VER_SIZE];
-	struct fw_block blocks[0];
+	struct fw_block blocks[];
 } __packed;
 
 /**
@@ -930,7 +930,7 @@ struct fw_mac {
 	__le32 reserved;
 	__le16 fw_ver_reg;
 	u8 fw_ver_data;
-	char info[0];
+	char info[];
 } __packed;
 
 /**
@@ -982,7 +982,7 @@ struct fw_phy_nc {
 	__le16 bp_start;
 	__le16 bp_num;
 	__le16 bp[4];
-	char info[0];
+	char info[];
 } __packed;
 
 enum rtl_fw_type {
Signature · 1 line
2.25.0
maintainer Applied
#1 lore raw

From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 06:23:05 -0600

Quoted 22 lines

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

Quoted 7 lines

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Applied.