fsstress,fsx: add io_uring test and do some fix
cover fsstress,fsx: add io_uring test and do some fix
This patchset tries to add new IO_URING test into fsstress [1/4] and fsx [4/4]. And then do some changes and bug fix by the way [2/4 and 3/4].
fsstress and fsx are important tools in xfstests to do filesystem I/Os test, lots of test cases use it. So add IO_URING operation into fsstress and fsx will help to cover IO_URING test from fs side.
I'm not an IO_URING expert, so cc io-uring@ list, please feel free to tell me if you find something wrong or have any suggestions to improve the test.
Thanks,
Zorro
PATCH 1/4 fsstress: add IO_URING read and write operations
IO_URING is a new feature of curent linux kernel, add basic IO_URING read/write into fsstess to cover this kind of IO testing.
--- README | 4 +- configure.ac | 1 + include/builddefs.in | 1 + ltp/Makefile | 5 ++ ltp/fsstress.c | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- m4/Makefile | 1 + m4/package_liburing.m4 | 4 ++ 7 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 m4/package_liburing.m4
README +2 -2
@@ -8,13 +8,13 @@ _______________________ sudo apt-get install xfslibs-dev uuid-dev libtool-bin \ e2fsprogs automake gcc libuuid1 quota attr libattr1-dev make \ libacl1-dev libaio-dev xfsprogs libgdbm-dev gawk fio dbench \ - uuid-runtime python sqlite3 + uuid-runtime python sqlite3 liburing-dev For Fedora, RHEL, or CentOS: yum install acl attr automake bc dbench dump e2fsprogs fio \ gawk gcc indent libtool lvm2 make psmisc quota sed \ xfsdump xfsprogs \ libacl-devel libattr-devel libaio-devel libuuid-devel \ - xfsprogs-devel btrfs-progs-devel python sqlite + xfsprogs-devel btrfs-progs-devel python sqlite liburing-devel (Older distributions may require xfsprogs-qa-devel as well.) (Note that for RHEL and CentOS, you may need the EPEL repo.) - run make
configure.ac +1 -0
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ AC_PACKAGE_NEED_ACLINIT_LIBACL AC_PACKAGE_WANT_GDBM AC_PACKAGE_WANT_AIO +AC_PACKAGE_WANT_URING AC_PACKAGE_WANT_DMAPI AC_PACKAGE_WANT_LINUX_FIEMAP_H AC_PACKAGE_WANT_FALLOCATE
include/builddefs.in +1 -0
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ RPM_VERSION = @rpm_version@ ENABLE_SHARED = @enable_shared@ HAVE_DB = @have_db@ HAVE_AIO = @have_aio@ +HAVE_URING = @have_uring@ HAVE_FALLOCATE = @have_fallocate@ HAVE_OPEN_BY_HANDLE_AT = @have_open_by_handle_at@ HAVE_DMAPI = @have_dmapi@
ltp/Makefile +5 -0
@@ -24,6 +24,11 @@ LCFLAGS += -DAIO LLDLIBS += -laio -lpthread endif +ifeq ($(HAVE_URING), true) +LCFLAGS += -DURING +LLDLIBS += -luring +endif + ifeq ($(HAVE_LIBBTRFSUTIL), true) LLDLIBS += -lbtrfsutil endif
ltp/fsstress.c +138 -1
187 lines not on this page · raw message
m4/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ LSRCFILES = \ package_dmapidev.m4 \ package_globals.m4 \ package_libcdev.m4 \ + package_liburing.m4 \ package_ncurses.m4 \ package_pthread.m4 \ package_ssldev.m4 \
m4/package_liburing.m4 new file +4 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +AC_DEFUN([AC_PACKAGE_WANT_URING], + [ AC_CHECK_HEADERS(liburing.h, [ have_uring=true ], [ have_uring=false ]) + AC_SUBST(have_uring) + ])
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
PATCH 2/4 fsstress: reduce the number of events when io_setup
In reply to Zorro LangThe original number(128) of aio events for io_setup is a little big. When try to run lots of fsstress processes(e.g. -p 1000) always hit io_setup EAGAIN error, due to the nr_events exceeds the limit of available events. So reduce it from 128 to 64, to make more fsstress processes can do AIO test.
--- ltp/fsstress.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
ltp/fsstress.c +4 -3
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@#endif #ifdef AIO #include <libaio.h> +#define AIO_ENTRIES 64io_context_t io_ctx;#endif #ifdef URING
@@ -699,8 +700,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) } procid = i;#ifdef AIO -if (io_setup (128 , &io_ctx) !=0 ) { -fprintf (stderr,"io_setup failed" ); +if (io_setup (AIO_ENTRIES , &io_ctx) !=0 ) { +fprintf (stderr,"io_setup failed\n" );exit (1 ); }#endif
@@ -714,7 +715,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)doproc ();#ifdef AIO if (io_destroy (io_ctx) !=0 ) { -fprintf (stderr,"io_destroy failed" ); +fprintf (stderr,"io_destroy failed\n" );return 1 ; }#endif
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
Re: [PATCH 2/4] fsstress: reduce the number of events when io_setup
Quoted 5 lines · Zorro Lang
The original number(128) of aio events for
io_setupis a little big. When try to run lots of fsstress processes(e.g. -p 1000) always hitio_setupEAGAIN error, due to thenr_eventsexceeds the limit of available events. So reduce it from 128 to 64, to make more fsstress processes can do AIO test.
It looks to me as though there's only ever one request in flight. I'd just set it to 1.
Also, you've included another change not mentioned in your changelog. Please make sure the changelog matches what's done in the patch.
-Jeff
Quoted 38 lines
Signed-off-by Zorro Lang <[email protected]>--- ltp/fsstress.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)ltp/fsstress.c +4
-3@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@#endif #ifdef AIO #include <libaio.h> +#define AIO_ENTRIES 64io_context_t io_ctx;#endif #ifdef URING @@ -699,8 +700,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) } procid = i;#ifdef AIO -if (io_setup (128 , &io_ctx) !=0 ) { -fprintf (stderr,"io_setup failed" ); +if (io_setup (AIO_ENTRIES , &io_ctx) !=0 ) { +fprintf (stderr,"io_setup failed\n" );exit (1 ); }#endif @@ -714,7 +715,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)doproc ();#ifdef AIO if (io_destroy (io_ctx) !=0 ) { -fprintf (stderr,"io_destroy failed" ); +fprintf (stderr,"io_destroy failed\n" );return 1 ; }#endif
Re: [PATCH 2/4] fsstress: reduce the number of events when io_setup
Quoted 8 lines · Jeff Moyer
Quoted 5 lines · Zorro Lang
The original number(128) of aio events for
io_setupis a little big. When try to run lots of fsstress processes(e.g. -p 1000) always hitio_setupEAGAIN error, due to thenr_eventsexceeds the limit of available events. So reduce it from 128 to 64, to make more fsstress processes can do AIO test.
Quoted 5 lines
It looks to me as though there's only ever one request in flight. I'd just set it to 1.
Also, you've included another change not mentioned in your changelog. Please make sure the changelog matches what's done in the patch.
Thanks Jeff, I'll rewrite this patch:) Do you have any review points about those two IO_URING related patches (1/4 and 4/4), or it looks good to you?
Thanks,
Zorro
Quoted 42 lines
-Jeff
Quoted 38 lines
Signed-off-by Zorro Lang <[email protected]>--- ltp/fsstress.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)ltp/fsstress.c +4
-3@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@#endif #ifdef AIO #include <libaio.h> +#define AIO_ENTRIES 64io_context_t io_ctx;#endif #ifdef URING @@ -699,8 +700,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) } procid = i;#ifdef AIO -if (io_setup (128 , &io_ctx) !=0 ) { -fprintf (stderr,"io_setup failed" ); +if (io_setup (AIO_ENTRIES , &io_ctx) !=0 ) { +fprintf (stderr,"io_setup failed\n" );exit (1 ); }#endif @@ -714,7 +715,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)doproc ();#ifdef AIO if (io_destroy (io_ctx) !=0 ) { -fprintf (stderr,"io_destroy failed" ); +fprintf (stderr,"io_destroy failed\n" );return 1 ; }#endif
PATCH 3/4 fsstress: fix memory leak in do_aio_rw
In reply to Zorro LangIf io_submit or io_getevents fails, the do_aio_rw() won't free the "buf" and cause memory leak.
--- ltp/fsstress.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
ltp/fsstress.c +16 -15
@@ -2099,8 +2099,7 @@ do_aio_rw(int opno, long r, int flags)if (!get_fname (FT_REGFILE , r, &f,NULL ,NULL , &v)) {if (v)printf ("%d/%d: do_aio_rw - no filename\n" , procid, opno); -free_pathname (&f); -return ; + goto aio_out3; } fd =open_path (&f, flags|O_DIRECT ); e = fd <0 ? errno :0 ;
@@ -2109,16 +2108,13 @@ do_aio_rw(int opno, long r, int flags)if (v)printf ("%d/%d: do_aio_rw - open %s failed %d\n" , procid, opno, f.path, e); -free_pathname (&f); -return ; + goto aio_out3; }if (fstat64 (fd, &stb) <0 ) {if (v)printf ("%d/%d: do_aio_rw - fstat64 %s failed %d\n" , procid, opno, f.path, errno); -free_pathname (&f); -close (fd); -return ; + goto aio_out2; }inode_info (st,sizeof (st), &stb, v);if (!iswrite && stb.st_size ==0 ) {
@@ -2150,6 +2146,12 @@ do_aio_rw(int opno, long r, int flags)else if (len > diob.d_maxiosz) len = diob.d_maxiosz; buf =memalign (diob.d_mem, len); +if (!buf) { +if (v) +printf ("%d/%d: do_aio_rw - memalign failed\n" , + procid, opno); + goto aio_out2; + }if (iswrite) { off = (off64_t)(lr %MIN (stb.st_size + (1024 *1024 ),MAXFSIZE ));
@@ -2166,27 +2168,26 @@ do_aio_rw(int opno, long r, int flags)if (v)printf ("%d/%d: %s - io_submit failed %d\n" , procid, opno, iswrite ?"awrite" :"aread" , e); -free_pathname (&f); -close (fd); - return; + goto aio_out1; }if ((e =io_getevents (io_ctx,1 ,1 , &event,NULL )) !=1 ) {if (v)printf ("%d/%d: %s - io_getevents failed %d\n" , procid, opno, iswrite ?"awrite" :"aread" , e); -free_pathname (&f); -close (fd); -return ; + goto aio_out1; } e = event.res != len ? event.res2 :0 ; -free (buf);if (v)printf ("%d/%d: %s %s%s [%lld,%d] %d\n" , procid, opno, iswrite ?"awrite" :"aread" , f.path, st, (long long )off, (int )len, e); -free_pathname (&f); + aio_out1: +free (buf); + aio_out2:close (fd); + aio_out3: +free_pathname (&f); }#endif
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
PATCH 4/4 fsx: add IO_URING test
In reply to Zorro LangNew IO_URING test for fsx, use -U option to enable IO_URING test.
--- ltp/fsx.c | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 140 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
ltp/fsx.c +140 -14
@@ -34,6 +34,9 @@#ifdef AIO #include <libaio.h> #endif +#ifdef URING +#include <liburing.h> +#endif #include <sys/syscall.h> #ifndef MAP_FILE
@@ -176,21 +179,17 @@ int integrity = 0; /* -i flag */int fsxgoodfd =0 ;int o_direct;/* -Z */ int aio =0 ; +int uring =0 ;int mark_nr =0 ;int page_size;int page_mask;int mmap_mask; -#ifdef AIO -int aio_rw (int rw,int fd,char *buf,unsigned len,unsigned offset); +int fsx_rw (int rw,int fd,char *buf,unsigned len,unsigned offset);#define READ 0#define WRITE 1 -#define fsxread (a,b,c,d) aio_rw(READ, a,b,c,d) -#define fsxwrite (a,b,c,d) aio_rw(WRITE, a,b,c,d) -#else -#define fsxread (a,b,c,d) read(a,b,c) -#define fsxwrite (a,b,c,d) write(a,b,c) -#endif +#define fsxread (a,b,c,d) fsx_rw(READ, a,b,c,d) +#define fsxwrite (a,b,c,d) fsx_rw(WRITE, a,b,c,d)const char *replayops =NULL ;const char *recordops =NULL ;
@@ -2242,7 +2241,7 @@ voidusage (void) { fprintf(stdout, "usage: %s", - "fsx [-dknqxABEFJLOWZ] [-b opnum] [-c Prob] [-g filldata] [-i logdev] [-j logid] [-l flen] [-m start:end] [-o oplen] [-p progressinterval] [-r readbdy] [-s style] [-t truncbdy] [-w writebdy] [-D startingop] [-N numops] [-P dirpath] [-S seed] fname\n\ + "fsx [-dknqxBEFJLOWZ][-A|-U] [-b opnum] [-c Prob] [-g filldata] [-i logdev] [-j logid] [-l flen] [-m start:end] [-o oplen] [-p progressinterval] [-r readbdy] [-s style] [-t truncbdy] [-w writebdy] [-D startingop] [-N numops] [-P dirpath] [-S seed] fname\n\ -b opnum: beginning operation number (default 1)\n\ -c P: 1 in P chance of file close+open at each op (default infinity)\n\ -d: debug output for all operations\n\
@@ -2265,7 +2264,10 @@ usage(void) -y synchronize changes to a file\n"#ifdef AIO -" -A: Use the AIO system calls\n" +" -A: Use the AIO system calls, -A excludes -U\n" +#endif +#ifdef URING +" -U: Use the IO_URING system calls, -U excludes -A\n" #endif" -D startingop: debug output starting at specified operation\n" #ifdef HAVE_LINUX_FALLOC_H
@@ -2425,13 +2427,127 @@ out_error: errno = -ret;return -1 ; } +#endif + +#ifdef URING +struct io_uring ring; +#define URING_ENTRIES 1024 +int +uring_setup () +{ +int ret; + + ret =io_uring_queue_init (URING_ENTRIES , &ring,0 ); +if (ret !=0 ) { +fprintf (stderr,"uring_setup: io_uring_queue_init failed: %s\n" , +strerror (ret)); +return -1 ; + } +return 0 ; +} -int aio_rw (int rw,int fd,char *buf,unsigned len,unsigned offset) +int +__uring_rw (int rw,int fd,char *buf,unsigned len,unsigned offset) { +struct io_uring_sqe *sqe; +struct io_uring_cqe *cqe;int ret; +int res, res2 =0 ; +char *p = buf; +unsigned l = len; +unsigned o = offset; + +/* +* Due to io_uring tries non-blocking IOs (especially read), that +* always cause 'normal' short reading. To avoid this short read +* fail, try to loop read/write (escpecilly read) data. +*/ + uring_loop: + sqe =io_uring_get_sqe (&ring); +if (!sqe) { +fprintf (stderr,"uring_rw: io_uring_get_sqe failed: %s\n" , +strerror (errno)); +return -1 ; + } + +if (rw ==READ ) { +io_uring_prep_read (sqe, fd, p, l, o); + }else { +io_uring_prep_write (sqe, fd, p, l, o); + } + + ret =io_uring_submit (&ring); +if (ret !=1 ) { +fprintf (stderr,"errcode=%d\n" , -ret); +fprintf (stderr,"uring %s: io_uring_submit failed: %s\n" , + rw ==READ ?"read" :"write" ,strerror (-ret)); + goto uring_error; + } + + ret =io_uring_wait_cqe (&ring, &cqe); +if (ret <0 ) { +if (ret ==0 ) +fprintf (stderr,"uring %s: no events available\n" , + rw ==READ ?"read" :"write" ); +else { +fprintf (stderr,"errcode=%d\n" , -ret); +fprintf (stderr,"uring %s: io_uring_wait_cqe failed: %s\n" , + rw ==READ ?"read" :"write" ,strerror (-ret)); + } + goto uring_error; + } + res = cqe->res; +io_uring_cqe_seen (&ring, cqe); + + res2 += res; +if (len != res2) { +if (res >0 ) { + o += res; + l -= res; + p += res; +if (l >0 ) + goto uring_loop; + }else if (res <0 ) { + ret = res; +fprintf (stderr,"errcode=%d\n" , -ret); +fprintf (stderr,"uring %s: io_uring failed: %s\n" , + rw ==READ ?"read" :"write" ,strerror (-ret)); + goto uring_error; + }else { +fprintf (stderr,"uring %s bad io length: %d instead of %u\n" , + rw ==READ ?"read" :"write" , res2, len); + } + } +return res2; + + uring_error: +/* +* The caller expects error return in traditional libc +* convention, i.e. -1 and the errno set to error. +*/ + errno = -ret; +return -1 ; +} +#endif + +int fsx_rw (int rw,int fd,char *buf,unsigned len,unsigned offset) +{ +int ret =-1 ;if (aio) { +#ifdef AIO ret =__aio_rw (rw, fd, buf, len, offset); +#elif + fprintf(stderr, "io_rw: need AIO support!\n"); +exit (111 ); +#endif + }else if (uring) { +#ifdef URING + ret =__uring_rw (rw, fd, buf, len, offset); +#elif + fprintf(stderr, "io_rw: need IO_URING support!\n"); +exit (111 ); +#endif }else {if (rw ==READ ) ret =read (fd, buf, len);
@@ -2441,8 +2557,6 @@ int aio_rw(int rw, int fd, char *buf, unsigned len, unsigned offset)return ret; } -#endif -#define test_fallocate (mode) __test_fallocate(mode, #mode)int
@@ -2496,7 +2610,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)setvbuf (stdout, (char *)0 , _IOLBF,0 );/* line buffered stdout */ while ((ch =getopt_long (argc, argv, -"b:c:dfg:i:j:kl:m:no:p:qr:s:t:w:xyABD:EFJKHzCILN:OP:RS:WXZ" , +"b:c:dfg:i:j:kl:m:no:p:qr:s:t:w:xyABD:EFJKHzCILN:OP:RS:UWXZ" , longopts,NULL )) !=EOF )switch (ch) {case 'b' :
@@ -2604,6 +2718,9 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)case 'A' : aio =1 ;break ; +case 'U' : + uring =1 ; +break ;case 'D' : debugstart =getnum (optarg, &endp);if (debugstart <1 )
@@ -2694,6 +2811,11 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)if (argc !=1 )usage (); +if (aio && uring) { +fprintf (stderr,"-A and -U shouldn't be used together\n" ); +usage (); + } +if (integrity && !dirpath) {fprintf (stderr,"option -i <logdev> requires -P <dirpath>\n" );usage ();
@@ -2784,6 +2906,10 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)if (aio)aio_setup ();#endif +#ifdef URING +if (uring) +uring_setup (); +#endif if (!(o_flags &O_TRUNC )) {off_t ret;
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
Re: [PATCH 4/4] fsx: add IO_URING test
Quoted 110 lines · Zorro Lang
New
IO_URINGtest for fsx, use -U option to enableIO_URINGtest.Signed-off-by Zorro Lang <[email protected]>--- ltp/fsx.c | 154 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 140 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)ltp/fsx.c +46
-11@@ -34,6 +34,9 @@#ifdef AIO #include <libaio.h> #endif +#ifdef URING +#include <liburing.h> +#endif #include <sys/syscall.h> #ifndef MAP_FILE @@ -176,21 +179,17 @@ int integrity = 0; /* -i flag */int fsxgoodfd =0 ;int o_direct;/* -Z */ int aio =0 ; +int uring =0 ;int mark_nr =0 ;int page_size;int page_mask;int mmap_mask; -#ifdef AIO -int aio_rw (int rw,int fd,char *buf,unsigned len,unsigned offset); +int fsx_rw (int rw,int fd,char *buf,unsigned len,unsigned offset);#define READ 0#define WRITE 1 -#define fsxread (a,b,c,d) aio_rw(READ, a,b,c,d) -#define fsxwrite (a,b,c,d) aio_rw(WRITE, a,b,c,d) -#else -#define fsxread (a,b,c,d) read(a,b,c) -#define fsxwrite (a,b,c,d) write(a,b,c) -#endif +#define fsxread (a,b,c,d) fsx_rw(READ, a,b,c,d) +#define fsxwrite (a,b,c,d) fsx_rw(WRITE, a,b,c,d)const char *replayops =NULL ;const char *recordops =NULL ;@@ -2242,7 +2241,7 @@ voidusage (void) { fprintf(stdout, "usage: %s", - "fsx [-dknqxABEFJLOWZ] [-b opnum] [-c Prob] [-g filldata] [-i logdev] [-j logid] [-l flen] [-m start:end] [-o oplen] [-p progressinterval] [-r readbdy] [-s style] [-t truncbdy] [-w writebdy] [-D startingop] [-N numops] [-P dirpath] [-S seed] fname\n\ + "fsx [-dknqxBEFJLOWZ][-A|-U] [-b opnum] [-c Prob] [-g filldata] [-i logdev] [-j logid] [-l flen] [-m start:end] [-o oplen] [-p progressinterval] [-r readbdy] [-s style] [-t truncbdy] [-w writebdy] [-D startingop] [-N numops] [-P dirpath] [-S seed] fname\n\ -b opnum: beginning operation number (default 1)\n\ -c P: 1 in P chance of file close+open at each op (default infinity)\n\ -d: debug output for all operations\n\@@ -2265,7 +2264,10 @@ usage(void) -y synchronize changes to a file\n"#ifdef AIO -" -A: Use the AIO system calls\n" +" -A: Use the AIO system calls, -A excludes -U\n" +#endif +#ifdef URING +" -U: Use the IO_URING system calls, -U excludes -A\n" #endif" -D startingop: debug output starting at specified operation\n" #ifdef HAVE_LINUX_FALLOC_H@@ -2425,13 +2427,127 @@ out_error: errno = -ret;return -1 ; } +#endif + +#ifdef URING +struct io_uring ring; +#define URING_ENTRIES 1024 +int +uring_setup () +{ +int ret; + + ret =io_uring_queue_init (URING_ENTRIES , &ring,0 ); +if (ret !=0 ) { +fprintf (stderr,"uring_setup: io_uring_queue_init failed: %s\n" , +strerror (ret)); +return -1 ; + } +return 0 ; +} -int aio_rw (int rw,int fd,char *buf,unsigned len,unsigned offset) +int +__uring_rw (int rw,int fd,char *buf,unsigned len,unsigned offset) { +struct io_uring_sqe *sqe; +struct io_uring_cqe *cqe;int ret; +int res, res2 =0 ; +char *p = buf; +unsigned l = len; +unsigned o = offset; + +/* +* Due to io_uring tries non-blocking IOs (especially read), that +* always cause 'normal' short reading. To avoid this short read +* fail, try to loop read/write (escpecilly read) data. +*/ + uring_loop: + sqe =io_uring_get_sqe (&ring);
ltp/fsx.c out_error: · line 2476
Quoted 10 lines
ltp/fsx.c +10
-0+if (!sqe) { +fprintf (stderr,"uring_rw: io_uring_get_sqe failed: %s\n" , +strerror (errno)); +return -1 ; + } + +if (rw ==READ ) { +io_uring_prep_read (sqe, fd, p, l, o); + }else { +io_uring_prep_write (sqe, fd, p, l, o);
I just found some old version liburing doesn't support io_uring_prep_read() and io_uring_prep_write() functions:
# make ... /tmp/ccmrsUN8.o: In function `__uring_rw': /home/xfstests-zlang/ltp/fsx.c:2474: undefined reference to `io_uring_prep_read' /home/xfstests-zlang/ltp/fsx.c:2476: undefined reference to `io_uring_prep_write' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status ...
# grep -rsn io_uring_prep_read /usr/include/liburing.h 189:static inline void io_uring_prep_readv(struct io_uring_sqe *sqe, int fd, 196:static inline void io_uring_prep_read_fixed(struct io_uring_sqe *sqe, int fd,
# rpm -q liburing liburing-0.2-2.xxx.xxxx
I'll turn to use io_uring_prep_readv() and io_uring_prep_writev() to get better compatibility.
Thanks,
Zorro
Quoted 131 lines
ltp/fsx.c +84
-3+ } + + ret =io_uring_submit (&ring); +if (ret !=1 ) { +fprintf (stderr,"errcode=%d\n" , -ret); +fprintf (stderr,"uring %s: io_uring_submit failed: %s\n" , + rw ==READ ?"read" :"write" ,strerror (-ret)); + goto uring_error; + } + + ret =io_uring_wait_cqe (&ring, &cqe); +if (ret <0 ) { +if (ret ==0 ) +fprintf (stderr,"uring %s: no events available\n" , + rw ==READ ?"read" :"write" ); +else { +fprintf (stderr,"errcode=%d\n" , -ret); +fprintf (stderr,"uring %s: io_uring_wait_cqe failed: %s\n" , + rw ==READ ?"read" :"write" ,strerror (-ret)); + } + goto uring_error; + } + res = cqe->res; +io_uring_cqe_seen (&ring, cqe); + + res2 += res; +if (len != res2) { +if (res >0 ) { + o += res; + l -= res; + p += res; +if (l >0 ) + goto uring_loop; + }else if (res <0 ) { + ret = res; +fprintf (stderr,"errcode=%d\n" , -ret); +fprintf (stderr,"uring %s: io_uring failed: %s\n" , + rw ==READ ?"read" :"write" ,strerror (-ret)); + goto uring_error; + }else { +fprintf (stderr,"uring %s bad io length: %d instead of %u\n" , + rw ==READ ?"read" :"write" , res2, len); + } + } +return res2; + + uring_error: +/* +* The caller expects error return in traditional libc +* convention, i.e. -1 and the errno set to error. +*/ + errno = -ret; +return -1 ; +} +#endif + +int fsx_rw (int rw,int fd,char *buf,unsigned len,unsigned offset) +{ +int ret =-1 ;if (aio) { +#ifdef AIO ret =__aio_rw (rw, fd, buf, len, offset); +#elif + fprintf(stderr, "io_rw: need AIO support!\n"); +exit (111 ); +#endif + }else if (uring) { +#ifdef URING + ret =__uring_rw (rw, fd, buf, len, offset); +#elif + fprintf(stderr, "io_rw: need IO_URING support!\n"); +exit (111 ); +#endif }else {if (rw ==READ ) ret =read (fd, buf, len);@@ -2441,8 +2557,6 @@ int aio_rw(int rw, int fd, char *buf, unsigned len, unsigned offset)return ret; } -#endif -#define test_fallocate (mode) __test_fallocate(mode, #mode)int @@ -2496,7 +2610,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)setvbuf (stdout, (char *)0 , _IOLBF,0 );/* line buffered stdout */ while ((ch =getopt_long (argc, argv, -"b:c:dfg:i:j:kl:m:no:p:qr:s:t:w:xyABD:EFJKHzCILN:OP:RS:WXZ" , +"b:c:dfg:i:j:kl:m:no:p:qr:s:t:w:xyABD:EFJKHzCILN:OP:RS:UWXZ" , longopts,NULL )) !=EOF )switch (ch) {case 'b' :@@ -2604,6 +2718,9 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)case 'A' : aio =1 ;break ; +case 'U' : + uring =1 ; +break ;case 'D' : debugstart =getnum (optarg, &endp);if (debugstart <1 )@@ -2694,6 +2811,11 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)if (argc !=1 )usage (); +if (aio && uring) { +fprintf (stderr,"-A and -U shouldn't be used together\n" ); +usage (); + } +if (integrity && !dirpath) {fprintf (stderr,"option -i <logdev> requires -P <dirpath>\n" );usage ();@@ -2784,6 +2906,10 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)if (aio)aio_setup ();#endif +#ifdef URING +if (uring) +uring_setup (); +#endif if (!(o_flags &O_TRUNC )) {off_t ret;Signature · 1 line
2.20.1