fsstress,fsx: add io_uring test and do some fix
v5 cover fsstress,fsx: add io_uring test and do some fix
This patchset tries to add new IO_URING test into fsstress [1/5] and fsx [4/5 and 5/5]. And then do some changes and bug fix by the way [2/5 and 3/5].
fsstress and fsx are important tools in xfstests to do filesystem I/Os test, lots of test cases use it. So add IO_URING operation into fsstress and fsx will help to cover IO_URING test from fs side.
I'm not an IO_URING expert, so cc io-uring@ list, please feel free to tell me if you find something wrong or have any suggestions to improve the test.
V2 did below changes:
1) 1/4 change the definition of URING_ENTRIES to 1
2) 2/4 change the difinition of AIO_ENTRIES to 1, undo an unrelated changed line
3) 4/4 turn to use io_uring_prep_readv/io_uring_prep_writev, due to old liburing(0.2-2) doesn't support io_uring_prep_read/io_uring_prep_write.
V3 changed io_uring_submit(&ring) to io_uring_submit_and_wait(&ring, 1). I'm not sure if this's the real mean of Jens Axboe's review point, please check.
https://marc.info/?l=fstests&m=159811932808057&w=2
V4 did below changes:
1) 1/5 change the "goto" related code of do_uring_rw()
2) 3/5 similar change as above
3) 4/5 new patch, separated from original 4/4 patch
3) 5/5 change #elif to #else
4) 5/5 change __uring_rw to uring_rw.
5) 5/5 change the loop logic in uring_rw().
V5 did below changes:
1) 1/5 turn to use (fd != -1)
2) 3/5 turn to use (fd != -1)
3) 5/5 change res to ret, change res2 to res.
Thanks,
Zorro
PATCH v5 1/5 fsstress: add IO_URING read and write operations
IO_URING is a new feature of curent linux kernel, add basic IO_URING read/write into fsstess to cover this kind of IO testing.
--- README | 4 +- configure.ac | 1 + include/builddefs.in | 1 + ltp/Makefile | 5 ++ ltp/fsstress.c | 139 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- m4/Makefile | 1 + m4/package_liburing.m4 | 4 ++ 7 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 m4/package_liburing.m4
README +2 -2
@@ -8,13 +8,13 @@ _______________________ sudo apt-get install xfslibs-dev uuid-dev libtool-bin \ e2fsprogs automake gcc libuuid1 quota attr libattr1-dev make \ libacl1-dev libaio-dev xfsprogs libgdbm-dev gawk fio dbench \ - uuid-runtime python sqlite3 + uuid-runtime python sqlite3 liburing-dev For Fedora, RHEL, or CentOS: yum install acl attr automake bc dbench dump e2fsprogs fio \ gawk gcc indent libtool lvm2 make psmisc quota sed \ xfsdump xfsprogs \ libacl-devel libattr-devel libaio-devel libuuid-devel \ - xfsprogs-devel btrfs-progs-devel python sqlite + xfsprogs-devel btrfs-progs-devel python sqlite liburing-devel (Older distributions may require xfsprogs-qa-devel as well.) (Note that for RHEL and CentOS, you may need the EPEL repo.) - run make
configure.ac +1 -0
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ AC_PACKAGE_NEED_ACLINIT_LIBACL AC_PACKAGE_WANT_GDBM AC_PACKAGE_WANT_AIO +AC_PACKAGE_WANT_URING AC_PACKAGE_WANT_DMAPI AC_PACKAGE_WANT_LINUX_FIEMAP_H AC_PACKAGE_WANT_FALLOCATE
include/builddefs.in +1 -0
@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ RPM_VERSION = @rpm_version@ ENABLE_SHARED = @enable_shared@ HAVE_DB = @have_db@ HAVE_AIO = @have_aio@ +HAVE_URING = @have_uring@ HAVE_FALLOCATE = @have_fallocate@ HAVE_OPEN_BY_HANDLE_AT = @have_open_by_handle_at@ HAVE_DMAPI = @have_dmapi@
ltp/Makefile +5 -0
@@ -24,6 +24,11 @@ LCFLAGS += -DAIO LLDLIBS += -laio -lpthread endif +ifeq ($(HAVE_URING), true) +LCFLAGS += -DURING +LLDLIBS += -luring +endif + ifeq ($(HAVE_LIBBTRFSUTIL), true) LLDLIBS += -lbtrfsutil endif
ltp/fsstress.c +138 -1
187 lines not on this page · raw message
m4/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ LSRCFILES = \ package_dmapidev.m4 \ package_globals.m4 \ package_libcdev.m4 \ + package_liburing.m4 \ package_ncurses.m4 \ package_pthread.m4 \ package_ssldev.m4 \
m4/package_liburing.m4 new file +4 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +AC_DEFUN([AC_PACKAGE_WANT_URING], + [ AC_CHECK_HEADERS(liburing.h, [ have_uring=true ], [ have_uring=false ]) + AC_SUBST(have_uring) + ])
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
PATCH v5 2/5 fsstress: reduce the number of events when io_setup
In reply to Zorro LangThe original number(128) of aio events for io_setup too big. When try to run lots of fsstress processes(e.g. -p 1000) always hit io_setup EAGAIN error, due to the nr_events exceeds the limit of available events. Due to each fsstress process only does once libaio read/write operation each time. So reduce the aio events number to 1, to make more fsstress processes can do AIO test.
--- ltp/fsstress.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
ltp/fsstress.c +3 -2
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@#endif #ifdef AIO #include <libaio.h> +#define AIO_ENTRIES 1io_context_t io_ctx;#endif #ifdef URING
@@ -699,8 +700,8 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) } procid = i;#ifdef AIO -if (io_setup (128 , &io_ctx) !=0 ) { -fprintf (stderr,"io_setup failed" ); +if (io_setup (AIO_ENTRIES , &io_ctx) !=0 ) { +fprintf (stderr,"io_setup failed\n" );exit (1 ); }#endif
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
PATCH v5 3/5 fsstress: fix memory leak in do_aio_rw
In reply to Zorro LangIf io_submit or io_getevents fails, the do_aio_rw() won't free the "buf" and cause memory leak.
--- ltp/fsstress.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
ltp/fsstress.c +19 -20
@@ -2078,11 +2078,11 @@ void do_aio_rw(int opno, long r, int flags) { int64_t align; -char *buf; +char *buf =NULL ;struct dioattr diob;int e;pathname_t f; -int fd; +int fd =-1 ;size_t len;int64_t lr;off64_t off;
@@ -2099,8 +2099,7 @@ do_aio_rw(int opno, long r, int flags)if (!get_fname (FT_REGFILE , r, &f,NULL ,NULL , &v)) {if (v)printf ("%d/%d: do_aio_rw - no filename\n" , procid, opno); -free_pathname (&f); -return ; + goto aio_out; } fd =open_path (&f, flags|O_DIRECT ); e = fd <0 ? errno :0 ;
@@ -2109,25 +2108,20 @@ do_aio_rw(int opno, long r, int flags)if (v)printf ("%d/%d: do_aio_rw - open %s failed %d\n" , procid, opno, f.path, e); -free_pathname (&f); -return ; + goto aio_out; }if (fstat64 (fd, &stb) <0 ) {if (v)printf ("%d/%d: do_aio_rw - fstat64 %s failed %d\n" , procid, opno, f.path, errno); -free_pathname (&f); -close (fd); -return ; + goto aio_out; }inode_info (st,sizeof (st), &stb, v);if (!iswrite && stb.st_size ==0 ) {if (v)printf ("%d/%d: do_aio_rw - %s%s zero size\n" , procid, opno, f.path, st); -free_pathname (&f); -close (fd); -return ; + goto aio_out; }if (xfsctl (f.path, fd,XFS_IOC_DIOINFO , &diob) <0 ) {if (v)
@@ -2150,6 +2144,12 @@ do_aio_rw(int opno, long r, int flags)else if (len > diob.d_maxiosz) len = diob.d_maxiosz; buf =memalign (diob.d_mem, len); +if (!buf) { +if (v) +printf ("%d/%d: do_aio_rw - memalign failed\n" , + procid, opno); + goto aio_out; + }if (iswrite) { off = (off64_t)(lr %MIN (stb.st_size + (1024 *1024 ),MAXFSIZE ));
@@ -2166,27 +2166,26 @@ do_aio_rw(int opno, long r, int flags)if (v)printf ("%d/%d: %s - io_submit failed %d\n" , procid, opno, iswrite ?"awrite" :"aread" , e); -free_pathname (&f); -close (fd); - return; + goto aio_out; }if ((e =io_getevents (io_ctx,1 ,1 , &event,NULL )) !=1 ) {if (v)printf ("%d/%d: %s - io_getevents failed %d\n" , procid, opno, iswrite ?"awrite" :"aread" , e); -free_pathname (&f); -close (fd); -return ; + goto aio_out; } e = event.res != len ? event.res2 :0 ; -free (buf);if (v)printf ("%d/%d: %s %s%s [%lld,%d] %d\n" , procid, opno, iswrite ?"awrite" :"aread" , f.path, st, (long long )off, (int )len, e); + aio_out: +if (buf) +free (buf); +if (fd !=-1 ) +close (fd);free_pathname (&f); -close (fd); }#endif
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
PATCH v5 4/5 fsx: introduce fsx_rw to combine aio_rw with general read and write
In reply to Zorro LangThe fsx contains different read and write operations, especially the AIO and general IO read/write. The fsx chooses one kind of read/write from AIO and general IO to run. To make the logic clear, use a common fsx_rw() function to swith between these two kinds of read/write.
--- ltp/fsx.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
ltp/fsx.c +17 -15
@@ -181,16 +181,11 @@ int mark_nr = 0;int page_size;int page_mask;int mmap_mask; -#ifdef AIO -int aio_rw (int rw,int fd,char *buf,unsigned len,unsigned offset); +int fsx_rw (int rw,int fd,char *buf,unsigned len,unsigned offset);#define READ 0#define WRITE 1 -#define fsxread (a,b,c,d) aio_rw(READ, a,b,c,d) -#define fsxwrite (a,b,c,d) aio_rw(WRITE, a,b,c,d) -#else -#define fsxread (a,b,c,d) read(a,b,c) -#define fsxwrite (a,b,c,d) write(a,b,c) -#endif +#define fsxread (a,b,c,d) fsx_rw(READ, a,b,c,d) +#define fsxwrite (a,b,c,d) fsx_rw(WRITE, a,b,c,d)const char *replayops =NULL ;const char *recordops =NULL ;
@@ -2347,7 +2342,8 @@ getnum(char *s, char **e)io_context_t io_ctx;struct iocb iocb; -int aio_setup () +int +aio_setup () {int ret; ret =io_queue_init (QSZ , &io_ctx);
@@ -2360,7 +2356,7 @@ int aio_setup() }int -__aio_rw (int rw,int fd,char *buf,unsigned len,unsigned offset) +aio_rw (int rw,int fd,char *buf,unsigned len,unsigned offset) {struct io_event event;static struct timespec ts;
@@ -2425,13 +2421,21 @@ out_error: errno = -ret;return -1 ; } +#else +aio_rw(int rw, int fd, char *buf, unsigned len, unsigned offset) +{ + fprintf(stderr, "io_rw: need AIO support!\n"); + exit(111); +} +#endif -int aio_rw (int rw,int fd,char *buf,unsigned len,unsigned offset) +int +fsx_rw (int rw,int fd,char *buf,unsigned len,unsigned offset) {int ret;if (aio) { - ret =__aio_rw (rw, fd, buf, len, offset); + ret =aio_rw (rw, fd, buf, len, offset); }else {if (rw ==READ ) ret =read (fd, buf, len);
@@ -2441,8 +2445,6 @@ int aio_rw(int rw, int fd, char *buf, unsigned len, unsigned offset)return ret; } -#endif -#define test_fallocate (mode) __test_fallocate(mode, #mode)int
@@ -2602,7 +2604,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv) do_fsync =1 ;break ;case 'A' : - aio =1 ; + aio =1 ;break ;case 'D' : debugstart =getnum (optarg, &endp);
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
PATCH v5 5/5 fsx: add IO_URING test
In reply to Zorro LangNew IO_URING test for fsx, use -U option to enable IO_URING test.
--- ltp/fsx.c | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 130 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
ltp/fsx.c +130 -3
@@ -34,6 +34,9 @@#ifdef AIO #include <libaio.h> #endif +#ifdef URING +#include <liburing.h> +#endif #include <sys/syscall.h> #ifndef MAP_FILE
@@ -176,6 +179,7 @@ int integrity = 0; /* -i flag */int fsxgoodfd =0 ;int o_direct;/* -Z */ int aio =0 ; +int uring =0 ;int mark_nr =0 ;int page_size;
@@ -2237,7 +2241,7 @@ voidusage (void) { fprintf(stdout, "usage: %s", - "fsx [-dknqxABEFJLOWZ] [-b opnum] [-c Prob] [-g filldata] [-i logdev] [-j logid] [-l flen] [-m start:end] [-o oplen] [-p progressinterval] [-r readbdy] [-s style] [-t truncbdy] [-w writebdy] [-D startingop] [-N numops] [-P dirpath] [-S seed] fname\n\ + "fsx [-dknqxBEFJLOWZ][-A|-U] [-b opnum] [-c Prob] [-g filldata] [-i logdev] [-j logid] [-l flen] [-m start:end] [-o oplen] [-p progressinterval] [-r readbdy] [-s style] [-t truncbdy] [-w writebdy] [-D startingop] [-N numops] [-P dirpath] [-S seed] fname\n\ -b opnum: beginning operation number (default 1)\n\ -c P: 1 in P chance of file close+open at each op (default infinity)\n\ -d: debug output for all operations\n\
@@ -2260,8 +2264,11 @@ usage(void) -y synchronize changes to a file\n"#ifdef AIO -" -A: Use the AIO system calls\n" +" -A: Use the AIO system calls, -A excludes -U\n"#endif +#ifdef URING +" -U: Use the IO_URING system calls, -U excludes -A\n" + #endif" -D startingop: debug output starting at specified operation\n" #ifdef HAVE_LINUX_FALLOC_H" -F: Do not use fallocate (preallocation) calls\n"
@@ -2429,6 +2436,112 @@ aio_rw(int rw, int fd, char *buf, unsigned len, unsigned offset) }#endif +#ifdef URING + +struct io_uring ring; +#define URING_ENTRIES 1024 + +int +uring_setup () +{ +int ret; + + ret =io_uring_queue_init (URING_ENTRIES , &ring,0 ); +if (ret !=0 ) { +fprintf (stderr,"uring_setup: io_uring_queue_init failed: %s\n" , +strerror (ret)); +return -1 ; + } +return 0 ; +} + +int +uring_rw (int rw,int fd,char *buf,unsigned len,unsigned offset) +{ +struct io_uring_sqe *sqe; +struct io_uring_cqe *cqe; +struct iovec iovec; +int ret; +int res =0 ; +char *p = buf; +unsigned l = len; +unsigned o = offset; + +/* +* Due to io_uring tries non-blocking IOs (especially read), that +* always cause 'normal' short reading. To avoid this short read +* fail, try to loop read/write (escpecilly read) data. +*/ +while (l >0 ) { + sqe =io_uring_get_sqe (&ring); +if (!sqe) { +fprintf (stderr,"uring_rw: io_uring_get_sqe failed: %s\n" , +strerror (errno)); +return -1 ; + } + + iovec.iov_base = p; + iovec.iov_len = l; +if (rw ==READ ) { +io_uring_prep_readv (sqe, fd, &iovec,1 , o); + }else { +io_uring_prep_writev (sqe, fd, &iovec,1 , o); + } + + ret =io_uring_submit_and_wait (&ring,1 ); +if (ret !=1 ) { +fprintf (stderr,"errcode=%d\n" , -ret); +fprintf (stderr,"uring %s: io_uring_submit failed: %s\n" , + rw ==READ ?"read" :"write" ,strerror (-ret)); + goto uring_error; + } + + ret =io_uring_wait_cqe (&ring, &cqe); +if (ret !=0 ) { +fprintf (stderr,"errcode=%d\n" , -ret); +fprintf (stderr,"uring %s: io_uring_wait_cqe failed: %s\n" , + rw ==READ ?"read" :"write" ,strerror (-ret)); + goto uring_error; + } + + ret = cqe->res; +io_uring_cqe_seen (&ring, cqe); + +if (ret >0 ) { + o += ret; + l -= ret; + p += ret; + res += ret; + }else if (ret <0 ) { +fprintf (stderr,"errcode=%d\n" , -ret); +fprintf (stderr,"uring %s: io_uring failed: %s\n" , + rw ==READ ?"read" :"write" ,strerror (-ret)); + goto uring_error; + }else { +fprintf (stderr,"uring %s bad io length: %d instead of %u\n" , + rw ==READ ?"read" :"write" , res, len); +break ; + } + } +return res; + + uring_error: +/* +* The caller expects error return in traditional libc +* convention, i.e. -1 and the errno set to error. +*/ + errno = -ret; +return -1 ; +} +#else +int +uring_rw (int rw,int fd,char *buf,unsigned len,unsigned offset) +{ +fprintf (stderr,"io_rw: need IO_URING support!\n" ); +exit (111 ); +} +#endif +int fsx_rw (int rw,int fd,char *buf,unsigned len,unsigned offset) {
@@ -2436,6 +2549,8 @@ fsx_rw(int rw, int fd, char *buf, unsigned len, unsigned offset)if (aio) { ret =aio_rw (rw, fd, buf, len, offset); + }else if (uring) { + ret =uring_rw (rw, fd, buf, len, offset); }else {if (rw ==READ ) ret =read (fd, buf, len);
@@ -2498,7 +2613,7 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)setvbuf (stdout, (char *)0 , _IOLBF,0 );/* line buffered stdout */ while ((ch =getopt_long (argc, argv, -"b:c:dfg:i:j:kl:m:no:p:qr:s:t:w:xyABD:EFJKHzCILN:OP:RS:WXZ" , +"b:c:dfg:i:j:kl:m:no:p:qr:s:t:w:xyABD:EFJKHzCILN:OP:RS:UWXZ" , longopts,NULL )) !=EOF )switch (ch) {case 'b' :
@@ -2606,6 +2721,9 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)case 'A' : aio =1 ;break ; +case 'U' : + uring =1 ; +break ;case 'D' : debugstart =getnum (optarg, &endp);if (debugstart <1 )
@@ -2696,6 +2814,11 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)if (argc !=1 )usage (); +if (aio && uring) { +fprintf (stderr,"-A and -U shouldn't be used together\n" ); +usage (); + } +if (integrity && !dirpath) {fprintf (stderr,"option -i <logdev> requires -P <dirpath>\n" );usage ();
@@ -2786,6 +2909,10 @@ main(int argc, char **argv)if (aio)aio_setup ();#endif +#ifdef URING +if (uring) +uring_setup (); +#endif if (!(o_flags &O_TRUNC )) {off_t ret;
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
Quoted 10 lines · Zorro Lang
This patchset tries to add new
IO_URINGtest into fsstress [1/5] and fsx [4/5 and 5/5]. And then do some changes and bug fix by the way [2/5 and 3/5].fsstress and fsx are important tools in xfstests to do filesystem I/Os test, lots of test cases use it. So add
IO_URINGoperation into fsstress and fsx will help to coverIO_URINGtest from fs side.I'm not an
IO_URINGexpert, so cc io-uring@ list, please feel free to tell me if you find something wrong or have any suggestions to improve the test.
Hi Eryu,
We're waiting for this patchset get merged. It's been reviewed-by Brian, do you still need more ACK?
Thanks,
Zorro
Quoted 29 lines
V2 did below changes:
1) 1/4 change the definition ofURING_ENTRIESto 1
2) 2/4 change the difinition ofAIO_ENTRIESto 1, undo an unrelated changed line
3) 4/4 turn to use io_uring_prep_readv/io_uring_prep_writev, due to old liburing(0.2-2) doesn't support io_uring_prep_read/io_uring_prep_write.V3 changed
io_uring_submit(&ring)toio_uring_submit_and_wait(&ring, 1). I'm not sure if this's the real mean of Jens Axboe's review point, please check.
https://marc.info/?l=fstests&m=159811932808057&w=2V4 did below changes:
1) 1/5 change the "goto" related code ofdo_uring_rw()
2) 3/5 similar change as above
3) 4/5 new patch, separated from original 4/4 patch
3) 5/5 change #elif to #else
4) 5/5 change__uring_rwtouring_rw.
5) 5/5 change the loop logic inuring_rw().V5 did below changes:
1) 1/5 turn to use (fd != -1)
2) 3/5 turn to use (fd != -1)
3) 5/5 change res to ret, change res2 to res.Thanks,
Zorro