of: device: fix repeated words in comments
PATCH 1/1 of: device: fix repeated words in comments
Delete the redundant word 'of'.
--- drivers/of/device.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/of/device.c +1 -1
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@/** * of_match_device - Tell if a struct device matches an of_device_id list -* @matches: array of of device match structures to search in +* @matches: array of device match structures to search in * @dev: the of device structure to match against * * Used by a driver to check whether an platform_device present in the
Signature · 1 line
2.36.1
Rob Herring
maintainerQuoted 1 line · Jilin Yuan
Delete the redundant word 'of'.
Again? Sigh.
Please read:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_JsqL4GvgFYzGUfhW5pvm4wYGrFaj6gHOYZjnOMuk2zCz67w@mail.gmail.com/
Quoted 2 lines
Signed-off-by Jilin Yuan <[email protected]>
Are you sure you are the author?
Quoted 21 lines
--- drivers/of/device.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/of/device.c +1
-1@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@/** * of_match_device - Tell if a struct device matches an of_device_id list -* @matches: array of of device match structures to search in +* @matches: array of device match structures to search in * @dev: the of device structure to match against * * Used by a driver to check whether an platform_device present in the Signature · 1 line
2.36.1
Quoted 5 lines · Rob Herring
Quoted 1 line · Jilin Yuan
Delete the redundant word 'of'.
Again? Sigh.
Quoted 9 lines
Please read:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_JsqL4GvgFYzGUfhW5pvm4wYGrFaj6gHOYZjnOMuk2zCz67w@mail.gmail.com/
Quoted 2 lines
Signed-off-by Jilin Yuan <[email protected]>Are you sure you are the author?
Hi Rob,
Some reviewers sent comments for similar patches from @cdjrlc.com people (including myself at [1]), with some of them requesting changes. However, there are never any responses to these reviews from @cdjrlc.com people, just like ZTE developers sending through cgel.zte ignored review comments [2] (try searching f:"cdjrlc.com" AND s:"Re:", it returns nothing for now).
Thanks.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
Signature · 1 line
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Rob Herring
maintainerQuoted 17 lines · Bagas Sanjaya
Quoted 5 lines · Rob Herring
Quoted 1 line · Jilin Yuan
Delete the redundant word 'of'.
Again? Sigh.
Quoted 9 lines
Please read:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAL_JsqL4GvgFYzGUfhW5pvm4wYGrFaj6gHOYZjnOMuk2zCz67w@mail.gmail.com/
Quoted 2 lines
Signed-off-by Jilin Yuan <[email protected]>Are you sure you are the author?
Quoted 8 lines
Hi Rob,
Some reviewers sent comments for similar patches from @cdjrlc.com people (including myself at [1]), with some of them requesting changes. However, there are never any responses to these reviews from @cdjrlc.com people, just like ZTE developers sending through cgel.zte ignored review comments [2] (try searching
f:"cdjrlc.com" AND s:"Re:", it returns nothing for now).
I can't decide whether to fix it correctly myself or leave it to see how many times I can get the same patch. :)
Rob
Quoted 9 lines · Rob Herring
Quoted 8 lines
Hi Rob,
Some reviewers sent comments for similar patches from @cdjrlc.com people (including myself at [1]), with some of them requesting changes. However, there are never any responses to these reviews from @cdjrlc.com people, just like ZTE developers sending through cgel.zte ignored review comments [2] (try searching
f:"cdjrlc.com" AND s:"Re:", it returns nothing for now).
Quoted 3 lines
I can't decide whether to fix it correctly myself or leave it to see how many times I can get the same patch. :)
Hi Rob,
I'm not talking about whether this patch should be picked up or not, but rather I'm pointing out the ignoring review behavior of @cdjrlc.com people.
Thanks.
Signature · 1 line
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Rob Herring
maintainerQuoted 11 lines · Bagas Sanjaya
Quoted 9 lines · Rob Herring
Quoted 8 lines
Hi Rob,
Some reviewers sent comments for similar patches from @cdjrlc.com people (including myself at [1]), with some of them requesting changes. However, there are never any responses to these reviews from @cdjrlc.com people, just like ZTE developers sending through cgel.zte ignored review comments [2] (try searching
f:"cdjrlc.com" AND s:"Re:", it returns nothing for now).
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I can't decide whether to fix it correctly myself or leave it to see how many times I can get the same patch. :)
Hi Rob,
I'm not talking about whether this patch should be picked up or not, but rather I'm pointing out the ignoring review behavior of @cdjrlc.com people.
Yes, I get that. Not responding seems to be a growing behavior not just on these trivial type patches. (Though replying with 'ok' to every review comment is equally annoying.) I suppose there could be some filtering happening such that replies are never received.
Rob