cpufreq: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
Subsystems (4)
PATCH 1/1 cpufreq: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence
It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test for presence of a property and nothing more.
--- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/imx-cpufreq-dt.c | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 4 ++-- drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c | 2 +- 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c +1 -1
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static bool __init cpu0_node_has_opp_v2_prop(void)struct device_node *np =of_cpu_device_node_get (0 );bool ret = false; -if (of_get_property (np,"operating-points-v2" ,NULL )) +if (of_property_present (np,"operating-points-v2" )) ret = true;of_node_put (np);
drivers/cpufreq/imx-cpufreq-dt.c +1 -1
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static int imx_cpufreq_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) cpu_dev =get_cpu_device (0 ); -if (!of_find_property (cpu_dev->of_node,"cpu-supply" ,NULL )) +if (!of_property_present (cpu_dev->of_node,"cpu-supply" ))return -ENODEV ;if (of_machine_is_compatible ("fsl,imx7ulp" )) {
drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c +2 -2
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static int imx6q_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)u32 val;int ret; -if (of_find_property (dev->of_node,"nvmem-cells" ,NULL )) { +if (of_property_present (dev->of_node,"nvmem-cells" )) { ret =nvmem_cell_read_u32 (dev,"speed_grade" , &val);if (ret)return ret;
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static int imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)u32 val;int ret =0 ; -if (of_find_property (dev->of_node,"nvmem-cells" ,NULL )) { +if (of_property_present (dev->of_node,"nvmem-cells" )) { ret =nvmem_cell_read_u32 (dev,"speed_grade" , &val);if (ret)return ret;
drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c +1 -1
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)#ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK /* dummy clock provider as needed by OPP if clocks property is used */ -if (of_find_property (dev->of_node,"#clock-cells" ,NULL )) +if (of_property_present (dev->of_node,"#clock-cells" ))devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider (dev, of_clk_hw_simple_get,NULL );#endif
drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c +1 -1
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ static bool cpu0_node_has_opp_v2_prop(void)struct device_node *np =of_cpu_device_node_get (0 );bool ret = false; -if (of_get_property (np,"operating-points-v2" ,NULL )) +if (of_property_present (np,"operating-points-v2" )) ret = true;of_node_put (np);
Signature · 1 line
2.39.2
Quoted 7 lines · Rob Herring
It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the recently added
of_property_present()helper when we just want to test for presence of a property and nothing more.
Quoted 8 lines
Signed-off-by Rob Herring <[email protected]>--- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/imx-cpufreq-dt.c | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 4 ++-- drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 2 +- drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c | 2 +- 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Applied. Thanks.
Signature · 1 line
viresh