Skip to contentSkip to conversation

cpufreq: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence

PATCH Applied Rob Herring 2 participants 2 messages Mar 10, 2023 – Mar 13, 2023

Subsystems (4)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 cpufreq: Use of_property_present() for testing DT property presence

It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test for presence of a property and nothing more.

---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/imx-cpufreq-dt.c     | 2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c      | 4 ++--
 drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c       | 2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c    | 2 +-
 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c +1 -1
index e85703651098..5ac6b9e5270e 100644
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@ static bool __init cpu0_node_has_opp_v2_prop(void)
 	struct device_node *np = of_cpu_device_node_get(0);
 	bool ret = false;
 
-	if (of_get_property(np, "operating-points-v2", NULL))
+	if (of_property_present(np, "operating-points-v2"))
 		ret = true;
 
 	of_node_put(np);
drivers/cpufreq/imx-cpufreq-dt.c +1 -1
index 76e553af2071..535867a7dfdd 100644
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static int imx_cpufreq_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	cpu_dev = get_cpu_device(0);
 
-	if (!of_find_property(cpu_dev->of_node, "cpu-supply", NULL))
+	if (!of_property_present(cpu_dev->of_node, "cpu-supply"))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	if (of_machine_is_compatible("fsl,imx7ulp")) {
drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c +2 -2
index ad4ce8493144..48e1772e98fd 100644
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static int imx6q_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)
 	u32 val;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "nvmem-cells", NULL)) {
+	if (of_property_present(dev->of_node, "nvmem-cells")) {
 		ret = nvmem_cell_read_u32(dev, "speed_grade", &val);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static int imx6ul_opp_check_speed_grading(struct device *dev)
 	u32 val;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "nvmem-cells", NULL)) {
+	if (of_property_present(dev->of_node, "nvmem-cells")) {
 		ret = nvmem_cell_read_u32(dev, "speed_grade", &val);
 		if (ret)
 			return ret;
drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c +1 -1
index 513a071845c2..f34e6382a4c5 100644
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static int scmi_cpufreq_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK
 	/* dummy clock provider as needed by OPP if clocks property is used */
-	if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "#clock-cells", NULL))
+	if (of_property_present(dev->of_node, "#clock-cells"))
 		devm_of_clk_add_hw_provider(dev, of_clk_hw_simple_get, NULL);
 #endif
 
drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c +1 -1
index ab7ac7df9e62..dfd2de4f8e07 100644
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ static bool cpu0_node_has_opp_v2_prop(void)
 	struct device_node *np = of_cpu_device_node_get(0);
 	bool ret = false;
 
-	if (of_get_property(np, "operating-points-v2", NULL))
+	if (of_property_present(np, "operating-points-v2"))
 		ret = true;
 
 	of_node_put(np);
Signature · 1 line
2.39.2
maintainer Applied
#1 lore raw
Quoted 7 lines · Rob Herring

It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e. of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties. As part of this, convert of_get_property/of_find_property calls to the recently added of_property_present() helper when we just want to test for presence of a property and nothing more.

Quoted 8 lines
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c | 2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/imx-cpufreq-dt.c     | 2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c      | 4 ++--
 drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c       | 2 +-
 drivers/cpufreq/tegra20-cpufreq.c    | 2 +-
 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Applied. Thanks.

Signature · 1 line
viresh