asdf
Hey Konstantin,
Can't be said enough: thanks for b4!
I have two inquiries about b4 send:
(1) Currently the message id that is generated for each patch sent by b4 has the format:
[date] - [branch name] - [version] - [patch number] - [random] @ kernel.org
where [date] is fixed and is taken from the change-id of the series as you mentioned in a fediverse thread.
It would be nice if we could - potentially opt-in via a config opt - set [date] to the date when the patch series was sent.
(2) I couldn't find an option to tell b4 send to set In-Reply-To: to one or more messages. That comes in handy when e.g., generating a patch in reply to syzbot report.
Maybe that's something worth adding.
Thanks!
Christian
Quoted 1 line · Christian Brauner
Can't be said enough: thanks for b4!
Glad to see so many people start to use it.
Quoted 5 lines
I have two inquiries about b4 send:
(1) Currently the message id that is generated for each patch sent by b4 has the format:
Quoted 7 lines
[date] - [branch name] - [version] - [patch number] - [random] @ kernel.org
where [date] is fixed and is taken from the change-id of the series as you mentioned in a fediverse thread.
It would be nice if we could - potentially opt-in via a config opt - set [date] to the date when the patch series was sent.
Sounds reasonable.
bugbot on
Quoted 5 lines
(2) I couldn't find an option to tell b4 send to set In-Reply-To: to one or more messages. That comes in handy when e.g., generating a patch in reply to syzbot report.
Maybe that's something worth adding.
I worry that this can create really weird thread interactions. E.g. if you have a bot report and it results in two different series being proposed:
original bot report
\
-- [PATCH] fixes one issue from the report
\
| -- [PATCH v2] fixes one issue from the report |
-- [PATCH] fixes a different issue from the report \
-- [PATCH v2] fixes a different issue from the report
This will confuse absolutely everyone, not just b4. :) It's best to just use Link:, I think.
-K
Hello:
This conversation is now tracked by Kernel.org Bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217359
There is no need to do anything else, just keep talking.
Signature · 2 lines
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. Kernel.org Bugzilla (peebz 0.1)
Re: b4: individual patch series should have the latest timestamp in the message-id
In reply to Christian BraunerKonstantin Ryabitsev writes in commit 377e02fe2bcd16946b821d3ec2c384192523ee75:
ez: make message-ids use today's date
When creating the message-id of the series to be sent, we're reusing the change-id, which includes the origin date when that change-id was first created. Change this to today's date in order to be more conforming to how git-send-email does it.
(via https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/b4/b4.git/commit/?id=377e02fe2bcd)
Signature · 2 lines
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. Kernel.org Bugzilla (peebz 0.1)