Kunit to check the longest symbol length
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 Kunit to check the longest symbol length
The longest length of a symbol (KSYM_NAME_LEN) was increased to 512 in the reference [1]. This patch adds a kunit test to check the longest symbol length.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
--- lib/Kconfig.debug | 9 +++ lib/Makefile | 1 + lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 130 insertions(+) create mode 100644 lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c
lib/Kconfig.debug +9 -0
@@ -2760,6 +2760,15 @@ config FORTIFY_KUNIT_TEST by the str*() and mem*() family of functions. For testing runtime traps of FORTIFY_SOURCE, see LKDTM's "FORTIFY_*" tests. +config LONGEST_SYM_KUNIT_TEST + tristate "Test the longest symbol possible" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + depends on KUNIT && KPROBES + default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS + help + Tests the longest symbol possible + + If unsure, say N. + config HW_BREAKPOINT_KUNIT_TEST bool "Test hw_breakpoint constraints accounting" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS depends on HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
lib/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_FORTIFY_KUNIT_TEST) += fortify_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_STRCAT_KUNIT_TEST) += strcat_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_STRSCPY_KUNIT_TEST) += strscpy_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_SIPHASH_KUNIT_TEST) += siphash_kunit.o +obj-$(CONFIG_LONGEST_SYM_KUNIT_TEST) += longest_symbol_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED) += devmem_is_allowed.o
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c new file +120 -0
120 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.39.2
Quoted 9 lines · Sergio González Collado
The longest length of a symbol (
KSYM_NAME_LEN) was increased to 512 in the reference [1]. This patch adds a kunit test to check the longest symbol length.[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
Signed-off-by Sergio González Collado <[email protected]>---
[...]
Alles gut!
Quoted 6 lines · Sergio González Collado
The longest length of a symbol (
KSYM_NAME_LEN) was increased to 512 in the reference [1]. This patch adds a kunit test to check the longest symbol length.
Quoted 7 lines
Signed-off-by Sergio González Collado <[email protected]>--- lib/Kconfig.debug | 9 +++ lib/Makefile | 1 + lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 130 insertions(+)create mode 100644
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c
I am a bit confused why this is *only* sent to the rust-for-linux list. Especially since there is no rust code and the changes do not change anything that Rust code uses.
Shouldn't this go to linux-kernel list and the maintainers of lib/Makefile instead?
Signature · 2 lines
Cheers, Benno
Quoted 15 lines · Benno Lossin
Quoted 6 lines · Sergio González Collado
The longest length of a symbol (
KSYM_NAME_LEN) was increased to 512 in the reference [1]. This patch adds a kunit test to check the longest symbol length.Quoted 7 lines
Signed-off-by Sergio González Collado <[email protected]>--- lib/Kconfig.debug | 9 +++ lib/Makefile | 1 + lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c | 120 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 130 insertions(+)create mode 100644
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c
Quoted 6 lines
I am a bit confused why this is *only* sent to the rust-for-linux list. Especially since there is no rust code and the changes do not change anything that Rust code uses.
Shouldn't this go to linux-kernel list and the maintainers of lib/Makefile instead?
Seems I missed the "To: linux-kself" and others, sorry for the noise.
Signature · 2 lines
Cheers, Benno
kernel test robot
build botkernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
Hi Sergio,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v6.6 next-20231106]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sergio-Gonz-lez-Collado/Kunit-to-check-the-longest-symbol-length/20231106-024653 base: linus/master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231105184010.49194-1-sergio.collado%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH] Kunit to check the longest symbol length config: i386-randconfig-014-20231106 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231107/[email protected]/config) compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231107/[email protected]/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test: error: malformed line 1810458:
7nnnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m
Signature · 2 lines
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
kernel test robot
build botkernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
Hi Sergio,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on linus/master]
[also build test WARNING on v6.6 next-20231107]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sergio-Gonz-lez-Collado/Kunit-to-check-the-longest-symbol-length/20231106-024653 base: linus/master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231105184010.49194-1-sergio.collado%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH] Kunit to check the longest symbol length config: sparc-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231108/[email protected]/config) compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231108/[email protected]/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:16:18: warning: no previous prototype for 'snnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7n' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
16 | #define DI(name) s##name##name
| ^
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:17:19: note: in expansion of macro 'DI'
17 | #define DDI(name) DI(n##name##name)
| ^~
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:18:20: note: in expansion of macro 'DDI'
18 | #define DDDI(name) DDI(n##name##name)
| ^~~
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:19:21: note: in expansion of macro 'DDDI'
19 | #define DDDDI(name) DDDI(n##name##name)
| ^~~~
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:20:22: note: in expansion of macro 'DDDDI'
20 | #define DDDDDI(name) DDDDI(n##name##name)
| ^~~~~
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:25:27: note: in expansion of macro 'DDDDDI'
25 | #define LONGEST_SYM_NAME DDDDDI(g1h2i3j4k5l6m7n)
| ^~~~~~
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:33:14: note: in expansion of macro 'LONGEST_SYM_NAME'
33 | noinline int LONGEST_SYM_NAME(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from <command-line>:
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:16:18: warning: no previous prototype for 'snnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ne' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
16 | #define DI(name) s##name##name
| ^
include/linux/compiler_types.h:83:23: note: in definition of macro '___PASTE'
83 | #define ___PASTE(a,b) a##b
| ^
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:22:21: note: in expansion of macro '__PASTE'
22 | #define PLUS1(name) __PASTE(name, e)
| ^~~~~~~
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:28:32: note: in expansion of macro 'PLUS1'
28 | #define LONGEST_SYM_NAME_PLUS1 PLUS1(LONGEST_SYM_NAME)
| ^~~~~
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:17:19: note: in expansion of macro 'DI'
17 | #define DDI(name) DI(n##name##name)
| ^~
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:18:20: note: in expansion of macro 'DDI'
18 | #define DDDI(name) DDI(n##name##name)
| ^~~
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:19:21: note: in expansion of macro 'DDDI'
19 | #define DDDDI(name) DDDI(n##name##name)
| ^~~~
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:20:22: note: in expansion of macro 'DDDDI'
20 | #define DDDDDI(name) DDDDI(n##name##name)
| ^~~~~
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:25:27: note: in expansion of macro 'DDDDDI'
25 | #define LONGEST_SYM_NAME DDDDDI(g1h2i3j4k5l6m7n)
| ^~~~~~ lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:28:38: note: in expansion of macro 'LONGEST_SYM_NAME'
28 | #define LONGEST_SYM_NAME_PLUS1 PLUS1(LONGEST_SYM_NAME)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c:38:14: note: in expansion of macro 'LONGEST_SYM_NAME_PLUS1'
38 | noinline int LONGEST_SYM_NAME_PLUS1(void)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/snnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nnng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7nng1h2i3j4k5l6m7ng1h2i3j4k5l6m7n +16 lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c
15
> 16 #define DI(name) s##name##name
17 #define DDI(name) DI(n##name##name)
18 #define DDDI(name) DDI(n##name##name)
19 #define DDDDI(name) DDDI(n##name##name)
20 #define DDDDDI(name) DDDDI(n##name##name)
21 Signature · 2 lines
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
lib/Makefile obj-$(CONFIG_FORTIFY_KUNIT_TEST) += fortify_kunit.o · line 408
Quoted 13 lines · Sergio González Collado
[...]
lib/Makefile +1
-0@@ -402,6 +402,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_FORTIFY_KUNIT_TEST) += fortify_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_STRCAT_KUNIT_TEST) += strcat_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_STRSCPY_KUNIT_TEST) += strscpy_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_SIPHASH_KUNIT_TEST) += siphash_kunit.o +obj-$(CONFIG_LONGEST_SYM_KUNIT_TEST) += longest_symbol_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED) += devmem_is_allowed.o
This test is triggering -Wmissing-prototypes, so you might have to either add the prototypes or change the hunk to this.
lib/Makefile +2 -0
@@ -402,6 +402,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_FORTIFY_KUNIT_TEST) += fortify_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_STRCAT_KUNIT_TEST) += strcat_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_STRSCPY_KUNIT_TEST) += strscpy_kunit.o obj-$(CONFIG_SIPHASH_KUNIT_TEST) += siphash_kunit.o +obj-$(CONFIG_LONGEST_SYM_KUNIT_TEST) += longest_symbol_kunit.o +CFLAGS_longest_symbol_kunit.o += $(call cc-disable-warning, missing-prototypes) obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_LIB_DEVMEM_IS_ALLOWED) += devmem_is_allowed.o
Quoted 6 lines
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c new file +0
-0
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c
Quoted 10 lines
lib/longest_symbol_kunit.c new file +10
-0+ +noinline int LONGEST_SYM_NAME(void) +{ +return RETURN_LONGEST_SYM ; +} + +noinline int LONGEST_SYM_NAME_PLUS1(void) +{ +return RETURN_LONGEST_SYM_PLUS1 ; +}
arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test.c has a buffer size of 256 that might be too short for these symbols, you might have to increase it for it to work.
Quoted 1 line
[...]