Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Add Phytec i.MX93 Segin support

PATCH Superseded Mathieu Othacehe 4 participants 9 messages Jan 17, 2024 – Jan 18, 2024

Subsystems (2)

v2 of 5 Superseded Latest is v5 →

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

v2 cover Add Phytec i.MX93 Segin support

Hello,

This adds support for the Phytec i.MX93 Segin board.

Thanks,

---
Changes in v2:
- Remove useless line
- Add missing reserved-memory entries

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/[email protected]/

Mathieu Othacehe (2):
dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX93 PHYTEC with Segin
arm64: dts: imx93-phycore-segin: Add Phytec i.MX93 Segin

 .../devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml          |  6 ++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile        |  1 +
 .../dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-segin.dts     | 93 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-som.dtsi | 64 +++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 164 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-segin.dts
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-som.dtsi
Signature · 1 line
2.41.0
#1 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/2 dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX93 PHYTEC with Segin

Add support for i.MX93 PHYTEC with Segin board.

---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml +6 -0
index 228dcc5c7d6f..196935d3abf0 100644
@@ -1275,6 +1275,12 @@ properties:
           - const: tq,imx93-tqma9352        # TQ-Systems GmbH i.MX93 TQMa93xxCA/LA SOM
           - const: fsl,imx93
 
+      - description: i.MX93 PHYTEC phyBOARD-Segin
+        items:
+          - const: phytec,imx93-phycore-segin
+          - const: phytec,imx93-phycore-som
+          - const: fsl,imx93
+
       - description:
           Freescale Vybrid Platform Device Tree Bindings
 
Signature · 1 line
2.41.0
#2 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX93 PHYTEC with Segin

Quoted 6 lines · Mathieu Othacehe

Add support for i.MX93 PHYTEC with Segin board.

---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the version they apply.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

#3 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add i.MX93 PHYTEC with Segin

In reply to Mathieu Othacehe

Hi Mathieu,

Quoted 12 lines · Mathieu Othacehe

Add support for i.MX93 PHYTEC with Segin board.

---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml +0 -0
index 228dcc5c7d6f..196935d3abf0 100644

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml properties: · line 1283

Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml +6 -0
@@ -1275,6 +1275,12 @@ properties:
           - const: tq,imx93-tqma9352        # TQ-Systems GmbH i.MX93 TQMa93xxCA/LA SOM
           - const: fsl,imx93
 
+      - description: i.MX93 PHYTEC phyBOARD-Segin
+        items:
+          - const: phytec,imx93-phycore-segin
+          - const: phytec,imx93-phycore-som
+          - const: fsl,imx93
+

PHYTEC has the following in their downstream kernel:

Quoted 5 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml +0 -0
      - description: PHYTEC phyCORE-i.MX93 SoM based boards
        items:
          - const: phytec,imx93-phyboard-segin # phyBOARD-Segin with i.MX93

- const: phytec,imx93-phycore-som # phyCORE-i.MX93 SoM
- const: fsl,imx93

so there will be additional boards based on phyCORE-i.MX93 SoMs just like with phyCORE-i.MX8MM.

Please consider fixing this in v3.

Quoted 3 lines

- description:
Freescale Vybrid Platform Device Tree Bindings

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

#4 lore raw

PATCH v2 2/2 arm64: dts: imx93-phycore-segin: Add Phytec i.MX93 Segin

In reply to Mathieu Othacehe

Add DTSI for Phytec i.MX93 System on Module and DTS for Phytec i.MX93 on Segin evaluation board.

This version comes with:
- 1GB LPDDR4 RAM
- external SD
- debug UART
- 1x 100Mbit Ethernet

---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile        |  1 +
 .../dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-segin.dts     | 93 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-som.dtsi | 64 +++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 158 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-segin.dts
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-som.dtsi
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile +1 -0
index 2e027675d7bb..f078d6ef75f7 100644
@@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx8qxp-colibri-iris-v2.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx8qxp-mek.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx8ulp-evk.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx93-11x11-evk.dtb
+dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx93-phycore-segin.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx93-tqma9352-mba93xxca.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx93-tqma9352-mba93xxla.dtb
 
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-segin.dts new file +93 -0

93 lines not on this page · raw message

arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-som.dtsi new file +64 -0

64 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
2.41.0
#5 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: imx93-phycore-segin: Add Phytec i.MX93 Segin

Hi Mathieu,

first of all, nice to see an attempt to upstream the board. A bit fast though as upstreaming was planned after the official PHYTEC release.

However, there is quite a lot of differences in respect to the downstream PHYTEC kernel tree.

I am sure PHYTEC wants to sync here to avoid general confusion.

CC-ing: [email protected]

So lets start:

- the board should be named "imx93-phyboard-segin" instead of "imx93-phycore-segin".

PHYTEC naming convention:
phyCORE -> the SoM
phyBOARD -> the base board (with the SoM)

Quoted 8 lines · Mathieu Othacehe

Add DTSI for Phytec i.MX93 System on Module and DTS for Phytec i.MX93 on Segin evaluation board.

This version comes with:
- 1GB LPDDR4 RAM
- external SD
- debug UART
- 1x 100Mbit Ethernet

Maybe you sync this commit msg + title with downstream commit like so:

Quoted 8 lines

arm64: dts: imx93: Add phyBOARD-Segin-i.MX93 support

Add basic support for phyBOARD-Segin-i.MX93.
Main features are:
* Ethernet
* SD-Card
* UART

plus add eMMC to the list if you decided to enable it?

Quoted 15 lines
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile        |  1 +
 .../dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-segin.dts     | 93 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-som.dtsi | 64 +++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 158 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-segin.dts
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-som.dtsi
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile +0 -0
index 2e027675d7bb..f078d6ef75f7 100644

arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx8qxp-colibri-iris-v2.dtb · line 204

Quoted 4 lines
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx8qxp-colibri-iris-v2.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx8qxp-mek.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx8ulp-evk.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx93-11x11-evk.dtb
+dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx93-phycore-segin.dtb

Like I said, this has to be renamed to imx93-phyboard-segin.dts as the official kit name is "phyBOARD-Segin-i.MX93".

Quoted 27 lines
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile +0 -0
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx93-tqma9352-mba93xxca.dtb
 dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += imx93-tqma9352-mba93xxla.dtb
 
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-segin.dts> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ new file +19 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..748b779a9dc1
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 PHYTEC Messtechnik GmbH
+ * Christoph Stoidner <[email protected]>
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Mathieu Othacehe <[email protected]>
+ *
+ */
+/dts-v1/;
+
+#include "imx93-phycore-som.dtsi"
+
+/{
+	model = "PHYTEC phyBOARD-Segin-i.MX93";
+	compatible = "phytec,imx93-phycore-segin", "phytec,imx93-phycore-som",
+		     "fsl,imx93";
+
+	chosen {
+		stdout-path = &lpuart1;
+	};

arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-segin.dts> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-segin.dts> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ new file +10 -0
+
+	reg_usdhc2_vmmc: regulator-usdhc2 {
+		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_reg_usdhc2_vmmc>;
+		regulator-name = "VSD_3V3";
+		regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
+		regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
+		gpio = <&gpio3 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+		enable-active-high;

Order properties here alphabetically like in the downstream kernel.

Comment applies for the entire patch.

Quoted 14 lines
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-segin.dts> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ new file +14 -0
+	};
+};
+
+/* Console */
+&lpuart1 {
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_uart1>;
+	status = "okay";
+};
+
+/* SD-Card */
+&usdhc2 {
+	pinctrl-names = "default", "state_100mhz", "state_200mhz";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_usdhc2>, <&pinctrl_usdhc2_gpio>;

arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-segin.dts> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-segin.dts> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ new file +10 -0
+	pinctrl-1 = <&pinctrl_usdhc2>, <&pinctrl_usdhc2_gpio>;
+	pinctrl-2 = <&pinctrl_usdhc2>, <&pinctrl_usdhc2_gpio>;
+	cd-gpios = <&gpio3 00 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+	vmmc-supply = <&reg_usdhc2_vmmc>;
+	bus-width = <4>;
+	status = "okay";
+	no-sdio;
+	no-mmc;
+};
+

Please consider adding pinctrl_100mhz and pinctrl_200mhz from the downstream kernel which were determined by HW measurements at those operating frequencies.

arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-segin.dts> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@

Quoted 8 lines
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-segin.dts> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ new file +8 -0
+/* Watchdog */
+&wdog3 {
+	status = "okay";
+};
+
+&iomuxc {
+	pinctrl-names = "default";
+	status = "okay";

Remove this pinctrl + status left-over?

arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-segin.dts> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@

Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-segin.dts> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ new file +5 -0
+
+	pinctrl_uart1: uart1grp {
+		fsl,pins = <
+			MX93_PAD_UART1_RXD__LPUART1_RX			0x31e
+			MX93_PAD_UART1_TXD__LPUART1_TX			0x31e

Please consider pinctrl settings from the down-stream kernel. They differ.

Quoted 56 lines
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-segin.dts> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ new file +27 -0
+		>;
+	};
+
+	pinctrl_reg_usdhc2_vmmc: regusdhc2vmmcgrp {
+		fsl,pins = <
+			MX93_PAD_SD2_RESET_B__GPIO3_IO07		0x31e
+		>;
+	};
+
+	pinctrl_usdhc2_gpio: usdhc2gpiogrp {
+		fsl,pins = <
+			MX93_PAD_SD2_CD_B__GPIO3_IO00			0x31e
+		>;
+	};
+
+	pinctrl_usdhc2: usdhc2grp {
+		fsl,pins = <
+			MX93_PAD_SD2_CLK__USDHC2_CLK			0x178e
+			MX93_PAD_SD2_CMD__USDHC2_CMD			0x139e
+			MX93_PAD_SD2_DATA0__USDHC2_DATA0		0x138e
+			MX93_PAD_SD2_DATA1__USDHC2_DATA1		0x138e
+			MX93_PAD_SD2_DATA2__USDHC2_DATA2		0x138e
+			MX93_PAD_SD2_DATA3__USDHC2_DATA3		0x139e
+			MX93_PAD_SD2_VSELECT__USDHC2_VSELECT		0x51e
+		>;
+	};
+};
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-som.dtsi new file +23 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4edff4a50b2b
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2023 PHYTEC Messtechnik GmbH
+ * Christoph Stoidner <[email protected]>
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Mathieu Othacehe <[email protected]>
+ *
+ */
+/dts-v1/;
+
+#include "imx93.dtsi"
+
+/{
+	model = "PHYTEC phyCORE-i.MX93";
+	compatible = "phytec,imx93-phycore-som", "fsl,imx93";
+
+	reserved-memory {
+		ranges;
+		#address-cells = <2>;
+		#size-cells = <2>;
+
+		linux,cma {
+			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+			reusable;

arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-som.dtsi line 33

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-som.dtsi new file +10 -0
+			alloc-ranges = <0 0x80000000 0 0x40000000>;
+			size = <0 0x10000000>;
+			linux,cma-default;
+		};
+
+		ele_reserved: ele-reserved@a4120000 {
+			compatible = "shared-dma-pool";
+			reg = <0 0xa4120000 0 0x100000>;
+			no-map;
+		};

Remove ele_reserved if you are not using it anywhere. This only applies to vendor kernel at the moment.

arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-som.dtsi line 45

Quoted 12 lines
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-som.dtsi new file +12 -0
+	};
+};
+
+/* eMMC */
+&usdhc1 {
+	pinctrl-names = "default", "state_100mhz", "state_200mhz";
+	pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_usdhc1>;
+	pinctrl-1 = <&pinctrl_usdhc1>;
+	pinctrl-2 = <&pinctrl_usdhc1>;
+	bus-width = <8>;
+	non-removable;
+	status = "okay";

Currently only default DDR50 is supported.

So no need for 100mhz + 200mhz pinctrls.

Quoted 9 lines
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-som.dtsi new file +9 -0
+};
+
+&iomuxc {
+	pinctrl_usdhc1: usdhc1grp {
+		fsl,pins = <
+			MX93_PAD_SD1_CLK__USDHC1_CLK		0x15fe
+			MX93_PAD_SD1_CMD__USDHC1_CMD		0x13fe
+			MX93_PAD_SD1_DATA0__USDHC1_DATA0	0x13fe
+			MX93_PAD_SD1_DATA1__USDHC1_DATA1	0x13fe

arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-som.dtsi line 64

Quoted 10 lines
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-som.dtsi new file +10 -0
+			MX93_PAD_SD1_DATA2__USDHC1_DATA2	0x13fe
+			MX93_PAD_SD1_DATA3__USDHC1_DATA3	0x13fe
+			MX93_PAD_SD1_DATA4__USDHC1_DATA4	0x13fe
+			MX93_PAD_SD1_DATA5__USDHC1_DATA5	0x13fe
+			MX93_PAD_SD1_DATA6__USDHC1_DATA6	0x13fe
+			MX93_PAD_SD1_DATA7__USDHC1_DATA7	0x13fe
+			MX93_PAD_SD1_STROBE__USDHC1_STROBE	0x15fe
+		>;
+	};
+};

BR,
Primoz

#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: imx93-phycore-segin: Add Phytec i.MX93 Segin

Quoted 12 lines · Primoz Fiser

arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-segin.dts line 29

Quoted 9 lines
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-phycore-segin.dts new file +9 -0
+	reg_usdhc2_vmmc: regulator-usdhc2 {
+		compatible = "regulator-fixed";
+		pinctrl-names = "default";
+		pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_reg_usdhc2_vmmc>;
+		regulator-name = "VSD_3V3";
+		regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
+		regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
+		gpio = <&gpio3 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
+		enable-active-high;

Order properties here alphabetically like in the downstream kernel.

Quoted 1 line

Comment applies for the entire patch.

Please do not order properties alphabetically. Instead, please read the new documentation on property ordering that makes explicit what has just been convention until now:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.rst?h=for-next&id=83a368a3fc8ae8538bccb713dc0cae9eacc04790#n112

Cheers,
Conor.

#7 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: imx93-phycore-segin: Add Phytec i.MX93 Segin

Hey,

Quoted 4 lines

Please do not order properties alphabetically. Instead, please read the new documentation on property ordering that makes explicit what has just been convention until now:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.rst?h=for-next&id=83a368a3fc8ae8538bccb713dc0cae9eacc04790#n112

Thanks for the link.

I have a question though. Regarding that section:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- /* SD-Card */

&usdhc2 {
	pinctrl-names = "default", "state_100mhz", "state_200mhz";
	pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_usdhc2_default>, <&pinctrl_usdhc2_cd>;
	pinctrl-1 = <&pinctrl_usdhc2_100mhz>, <&pinctrl_usdhc2_cd>;
	pinctrl-2 = <&pinctrl_usdhc2_200mhz>, <&pinctrl_usdhc2_cd>;
	bus-width = <4>;
	cd-gpios = <&gpio3 00 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
	no-sdio;
	no-mmc;
	vmmc-supply = <&reg_usdhc2_vmmc>;
	status = "okay";
};

--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

The documentation states:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Order of Properties in Device Node
----------------------------------

The following order of properties in device nodes is preferred:

1. "compatible"
2. "reg"
3. "ranges"
4. Standard/common properties (defined by common bindings, e.g. without vendor-prefixes)
5. Vendor-specific properties
6. "status" (if applicable)
7. Child nodes, where each node is preceded with a blank line --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

All of the properties in my example are falling into the "4" category I guess, except for "status" that should come last. Now, how am I supposed to order those properties? I had a look to other IMX device trees and it is hard to establish a pattern. Pinctrl first, then alphabetical order? Anything else?

Thanks for the guidance,

Mathieu

#8 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: dts: imx93-phycore-segin: Add Phytec i.MX93 Segin

Quoted 46 lines · Mathieu Othacehe

Hey,

Quoted 4 lines

Please do not order properties alphabetically. Instead, please read the new documentation on property ordering that makes explicit what has just been convention until now:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dts-coding-style.rst?h=for-next&id=83a368a3fc8ae8538bccb713dc0cae9eacc04790#n112

Thanks for the link.

I have a question though. Regarding that section:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- /* SD-Card */

&usdhc2 {
	pinctrl-names = "default", "state_100mhz", "state_200mhz";
	pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_usdhc2_default>, <&pinctrl_usdhc2_cd>;
	pinctrl-1 = <&pinctrl_usdhc2_100mhz>, <&pinctrl_usdhc2_cd>;
	pinctrl-2 = <&pinctrl_usdhc2_200mhz>, <&pinctrl_usdhc2_cd>;
	bus-width = <4>;
	cd-gpios = <&gpio3 00 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
	no-sdio;
	no-mmc;
	vmmc-supply = <&reg_usdhc2_vmmc>;
	status = "okay";
};

--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

The documentation states:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Order of Properties in Device Node
----------------------------------

The following order of properties in device nodes is preferred:

1. "compatible"
2. "reg"
3. "ranges"
4. Standard/common properties (defined by common bindings, e.g. without vendor-prefixes)
5. Vendor-specific properties
6. "status" (if applicable)
7. Child nodes, where each node is preceded with a blank line --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Quoted 5 lines

All of the properties in my example are falling into the "4" category I guess, except for "status" that should come last. Now, how am I supposed to order those properties? I had a look to other IMX device trees and it is hard to establish a pattern. Pinctrl first, then alphabetical order? Anything else?

If that is the established order for imx devicetrees, then yeah, I would follow that ordering. From my own quick check of recently added boards, that is the way things seem to be.

Cheers,
Conor.