Skip to contentSkip to conversation

kunit: fix longest symbol length test

PATCH Superseded Sergio González Collado 2 participants 3 messages May 14, 2025 – Jul 4, 2025

Subsystems (4)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/1 kunit: fix longest symbol length test

The kunit test that checks the longests symbol length [1], has triggered warnings in some pilelines when symbol prefixes are used [2][3]. The test will to depend on !PREFIX_SYMBOLS and !CFI_CLANG as sujested in [4] and on !GCOV_KERNEL.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/CABVgOSm=5Q0fM6neBhxSbOUHBgNzmwf2V22vsYC10YRBT=kN1g@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/T/#u
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/T/#t
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20250427200916.GA1661412@ax162/T/#t

---
v2 -> v3: added dependency on !GCOV_KERNEL (to avoid __gcov_ prefix)
---
v1 -> v2: added dependency on !CFI_CLANG as suggested in [3], removed
CONFIG_ prefix

---
 lib/Kconfig.debug                | 1 +
 lib/tests/longest_symbol_kunit.c | 3 +--
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
lib/Kconfig.debug +1 -0
index f9051ab610d5..e55c761eae20 100644
@@ -2886,6 +2886,7 @@ config FORTIFY_KUNIT_TEST
 config LONGEST_SYM_KUNIT_TEST
 	tristate "Test the longest symbol possible" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
 	depends on KUNIT && KPROBES
+	depends on !PREFIX_SYMBOLS && !CFI_CLANG && !GCOV_KERNEL
 	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
 	help
 	  Tests the longest symbol possible
lib/tests/longest_symbol_kunit.c +1 -2
index e3c28ff1807f..9b4de3050ba7 100644
@@ -3,8 +3,7 @@
  * Test the longest symbol length. Execute with:
  *  ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run longest-symbol
  *  --arch=x86_64 --kconfig_add CONFIG_KPROBES=y --kconfig_add CONFIG_MODULES=y
- *  --kconfig_add CONFIG_RETPOLINE=n --kconfig_add CONFIG_CFI_CLANG=n
- *  --kconfig_add CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE=n
+ *  --kconfig_add CONFIG_CPU_MITIGATIONS=n --kconfig_add CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL=n
  */
 
 #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt

base-commit: 1a80a098c606b285fb0a13aa992af4f86da1ff06

Signature · 1 line
2.39.2
Acked-by Tested-by on v3 1/1
#1 lore raw
Quoted 5 lines · Sergio González Collado

The kunit test that checks the longests symbol length [1], has triggered warnings in some pilelines when symbol prefixes are used [2][3]. The test will to depend on !PREFIX_SYMBOLS and !CFI_CLANG as sujested in [4] and on !GCOV_KERNEL.

Quoted 7 lines

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/CABVgOSm=5Q0fM6neBhxSbOUHBgNzmwf2V22vsYC10YRBT=kN1g@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/T/#u
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/T/#t
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20250427200916.GA1661412@ax162/T/#t

Works for me. Thanks.

Quoted 38 lines

---
v2 -> v3: added dependency on !GCOV_KERNEL (to avoid __gcov_ prefix)
---
v1 -> v2: added dependency on !CFI_CLANG as suggested in [3], removed
CONFIG_ prefix

---
 lib/Kconfig.debug                | 1 +
 lib/tests/longest_symbol_kunit.c | 3 +--
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
lib/Kconfig.debug +1 -0
index f9051ab610d5..e55c761eae20 100644
@@ -2886,6 +2886,7 @@ config FORTIFY_KUNIT_TEST
 config LONGEST_SYM_KUNIT_TEST
 	tristate "Test the longest symbol possible" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
 	depends on KUNIT && KPROBES
+	depends on !PREFIX_SYMBOLS && !CFI_CLANG && !GCOV_KERNEL
 	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
 	help
 	  Tests the longest symbol possible
lib/tests/longest_symbol_kunit.c +1 -2
index e3c28ff1807f..9b4de3050ba7 100644
@@ -3,8 +3,7 @@
  * Test the longest symbol length. Execute with:
  *  ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run longest-symbol
  *  --arch=x86_64 --kconfig_add CONFIG_KPROBES=y --kconfig_add CONFIG_MODULES=y
- *  --kconfig_add CONFIG_RETPOLINE=n --kconfig_add CONFIG_CFI_CLANG=n
- *  --kconfig_add CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE=n
+ *  --kconfig_add CONFIG_CPU_MITIGATIONS=n --kconfig_add CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL=n
  */
 
 #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt

base-commit: 1a80a098c606b285fb0a13aa992af4f86da1ff06

Signature · 1 line
~Randy
#2 lore raw
Quoted 58 lines · Randy Dunlap
Quoted 5 lines · Sergio González Collado

The kunit test that checks the longests symbol length [1], has triggered warnings in some pilelines when symbol prefixes are used [2][3]. The test will to depend on !PREFIX_SYMBOLS and !CFI_CLANG as sujested in [4] and on !GCOV_KERNEL.

Quoted 7 lines

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/CABVgOSm=5Q0fM6neBhxSbOUHBgNzmwf2V22vsYC10YRBT=kN1g@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/T/#u
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/T/#t
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20250427200916.GA1661412@ax162/T/#t

Works for me. Thanks.

Quoted 35 lines

---
v2 -> v3: added dependency on !GCOV_KERNEL (to avoid __gcov_ prefix)
---
v1 -> v2: added dependency on !CFI_CLANG as suggested in [3], removed
CONFIG_ prefix

---
 lib/Kconfig.debug                | 1 +
 lib/tests/longest_symbol_kunit.c | 3 +--
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
lib/Kconfig.debug +1 -0
index f9051ab610d5..e55c761eae20 100644
@@ -2886,6 +2886,7 @@ config FORTIFY_KUNIT_TEST
 config LONGEST_SYM_KUNIT_TEST
 	tristate "Test the longest symbol possible" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
 	depends on KUNIT && KPROBES
+	depends on !PREFIX_SYMBOLS && !CFI_CLANG && !GCOV_KERNEL
 	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
 	help
 	  Tests the longest symbol possible
lib/tests/longest_symbol_kunit.c +1 -2
index e3c28ff1807f..9b4de3050ba7 100644
@@ -3,8 +3,7 @@
  * Test the longest symbol length. Execute with:
  *  ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run longest-symbol
  *  --arch=x86_64 --kconfig_add CONFIG_KPROBES=y --kconfig_add CONFIG_MODULES=y
- *  --kconfig_add CONFIG_RETPOLINE=n --kconfig_add CONFIG_CFI_CLANG=n
- *  --kconfig_add CONFIG_MITIGATION_RETPOLINE=n
+ *  --kconfig_add CONFIG_CPU_MITIGATIONS=n --kconfig_add CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL=n
  */
 
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 3 lines
lib/tests/longest_symbol_kunit.c +0 -0
 #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt

base-commit: 1a80a098c606b285fb0a13aa992af4f86da1ff06

Hi,

I'm still seeing this issue in linux-next 20250703.

Any merge plans for this patch?

Thanks.

Signature · 1 line
~Randy